Bible Version Links

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Bible Version Links Articles about Bible versions and about problems with modern Bible translations Large Directory Of English Bible Versions, Translations, and Paraphrases Comprehensive List Of English Bible Versions Dial-The-Truth-Ministries – Information defending/supporting the KJV Bible Does the Authorized Version contain archaic words? English Bible History – a timeline English Bible Versions – extensive listing at bible-researcher.com Fighting Back – A Handy Reference For King James Bible Believers Historical Timelines of Bible Translations & Biblical Texts Introductory Dedication To King James In the 1611 KJV Bible James White’s Bible Blunders Book – audio message at YouTube by Will Kinney Jame’s White’s Shell Game – article pointing about problems with James White’s analysis of the KJB KJV Today – Information about the accuracy, reliability and relevance of the King James Bible Modern Bible Versions – A Trojan Horse The Bible For Today (A website for KJV lovers) The History Of The English Bible at bibletopics.com Newadvent.org’s “Versions Of The Bible” page – Please note: New Advent is a Catholic organization The New Eye-Opener – 200 English Bible changes examined The Translators’ Preface To The Reader In the 1611 KJV Bible Young’s Literal Translation Of The Bible – Introductory Text The English Standard Version Exposed By Ken Matto 448 Reasons Why I Cannot Trust Any Modern Bible Version! (PDF format) The Ever Changing ESVs: 2001, 2007, 2011 And 2016 Editions = Just Another Vatican Version Two New Testament Text Lines Lineage Of Modern Corrupt Versions Of The Bible The Revised Standard Version Exposed The King James Bible Compared To The Geneva Bible Geneva Bible vs. King James Bible – Which is Better? – Part 1 Geneva Bible vs. King James Bible – Which is Better? – Part 2 Comparison of the King James and Geneva Bibles (PDF format) Bible Translation Effects: Geneva vs. King James KING JAMES BIBLE VERSUS GENEVA BIBLE.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Geneva Bible and Jauss' "Horizon of Expectations"
1994 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 175 TRANSLATION AND THEORY- THE GENEVA BIBLE AND JAUSS' "HORIZON OF EXPECTATIONS" Michael Jensen The Geneva Bible was the Bible that became the Bible of its generation, favoured by an impressive array of writers from Shakespeare and Spenser to Milton. Read on its own terms, however, it demanded devotion rather than mere exegesis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the achievement of the Geneva Bible from the point of view of reading by examining what the translation asked of its original readers and how it changed their "horizon of expectations". This method, adapted from the reception-theory of Hans Robert Jauss, provides a means by which to assess the readers' responses to the Geneva Bible. Central to the Geneva Bible's achievement was the model of reading it prescribed -"simple reading": the readers of the Geneva Bible were called to become "simple readers". The historical situation First published in 1560, the Geneva Bible was produced and read at a time of crisis in English history. Following Mary's accession in 1553, almost 1,000 English Protestants fled to the Continent, mainly to Germany and Switzerland. The group represented the most radical faction of English Protestantism. Calvin's Geneva in the 1550s was a centre for biblical textual scholarship which resulted in new editions of the Greek and Hebrew texts, a factor which attracted many of the exiles. It was here, in a scholarly and spiritually favourable environment that a team of translators, lead by William Whittingham, began work on a new English Bible. The result of their labours was a Bible for an England still under the threat of Catholic rule and for a church still in need of reform (in their view).
[Show full text]
What About Young's 'Literal' Translation?
What about Young's 'literal' translation? Young’s “literal” (Hah!) translation I recently had another conversation at one of the Christian Forums about whether or not there exists such a thing as a complete, inspired and 100% true Bible in any language, and I ran into another guy who was trying to push Young’s ‘literal’ translation as being better than the King James Bible. So, I addressed the points he raised and then finally decided to write something more about this bogus bible version so that everyone can see it for what it is - just another shabbily dressed impostor. Here is our initial conversation, followed by some more examples of just how pathetic this so called ‘literal” translation really is. Will (that’s me) said: "Young's has some very serious problems. Do you have eternal life or just "age during life"? Is God from everlasting to everlasting, or just "age during"? The man recommending Young’s then responds: [quote]” I believe that many people make the mistake of equating eternal to everlasting and the phrase age-during. Eternal is uncreated and not bound by time. Everlasting, Forever, or Age-During is a created state, but may go on without end. A Hebrew age is a reference to a thousand year lifespan such as Adam and Methuselah experienced. If you accept the holy-day prophecy of 6 thousand years of work and 1 thousand year reign of God, age-during makes sense in a dispensational way. The understanding of the Hebrew 'owlam' is persistent endurance which can render as everlasting, forever, or the during part of -age-during.
[Show full text]
The History of the English Language Bible
DISCOVER TheThe HistoryHistory ofof thethe EnglishEnglish LanguageLanguage BibleBible Presbyterian Heritage Center John 1:36 Illuminated Page — Call of the Disciples, Donald Jackson, Copyright 2002, Presbyterian Heritage Center PO Box 207 The Saint John’s Bible, Saint John’s University, Collegeville, Presbyterian Heritage Center Minnesota USA. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Montreat, NC 28757 Booklet copyright, 2016, January. Presbyterian Heritage Center. Learning Initiatives Educational Skills Used In This Booklet Booklets, Presentations, DVDs Analyze Cause and Effect 5, 9, 15 Conceptualize 19 Discussions 5, 9, 12, 15, 18, 19 Learning Initiatives Series Draw Conclusions 12. 19 The Presbyterian Heritage Center (PHC) creates new exhibits each year from its archives and Evaluate 12, 17 artifact collections, as well as from loans of materials from individuals and institutions. Onsite, we Explain 9, 15 utilize many different techniques to educate, including the displays, videos, touch screen kiosks and Make Inferences 5 more. To reach young people, we conduct Confirmation Classes (history), Collegiate Studies & Pose and Answer Questions 5. 18. 19 Visitations, Supplemental Club Programs, Youth Conference Research 5, 9, 12, 15, 18, 19 Related Exhibits, Online & Hands On Activities and Youth Summarize 18 Sunday School Lessons for all Presbyterian denominations. Write 18 Back cover photo shows an illuminated In addition to these limited-time exhibits, the PHC seeks to page from John 1:36 from The Saint provide accompanying educational materials, such as learning John’s Bible. The illumination is entitled booklets, online downloadable materials and DVD resource Call of the Disciples, by Donald Jackson, disks for adults and young people. Copyright 2002, The Saint John’s Bible, The Presbyterian Heritage Center (PHC) believes that Saint John’s University, Collegeville, learning can be exciting, inspiring and transformational.
[Show full text]
A Brief History of the English Bible
A Brief History of the English Bible by Daniel J. Lewis © copyright 2012 by Diakonos, Inc. Troy, Michigan United States of America 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Brief History of the English Bible .............................................................. 1 The Earliest English Translations ................................................................... 3 The Wyclif Version ........................................................................................ 4 Reformation Bibles ......................................................................................... 6 William Tyndale ............................................................................................. 8 Tyndale’s Immediate Heritage ..................................................................... 10 The Great Bible ............................................................................................. 11 The Geneva Bible ......................................................................................... 12 The Bishops’ Bible ....................................................................................... 12 The King James Version ............................................................................... 13 The Legacy of the King James Version ........................................................ 15 Revising a Landmark .................................................................................... 17 Modern English Versions ............................................................................. 19 3 The year 2011 is
[Show full text]
FOUR EARLY BIBLES in PILGRIM HALL by Rev
FOUR EARLY BIBLES IN PILGRIM HALL by Rev. Dr. Charles C. Forman Pilgrim Society Note, Series One, Number Nine, April 1959 Among the books in Pilgrim Hall are four Bibles of unusual interest. One belonged to Governor William Bradford, the Pilgrim Governor, and one to John Alden. These are among the very few objects existing today which we feel reasonably sure "came over in the Mayflower." Of the history of the two others we know little, but they are Geneva Bibles, the version most commonly used by the Pilgrims. John Alden’s Bible, rather surprisingly, is the "King James" version authorized by the Church of England, but he also owned a Geneva Bible, which is now in the Dartmouth College Library. The four Bibles belonging to the Pilgrim Society have been carefully examined by the Rev. Dr. Charles C. Forman, pastor of the First Parish [Plymouth], who has contributed the following notes on the evolution of the Geneva Bible, its characteristics and historical importance. Miss Briggs is responsible for the notes on decorative details. THE GENEVA BIBLE : THE BIBLE USED BY THE PILGRIMS Nearly every Pilgrim household possessed a copy of the Bible, usually in the Geneva translation, which is sometimes called the "breeches" Bible because of the quaint translation of Genesis III:7, where it is said that Adam and Eve, realizing their nakedness, "sewed fig leaves together and made themselves breeches." The Geneva Bible occupies a proud place in the history of translations. In order to understand something of its character and significance we must recall earlier attempts at "englishing" the Scriptures.
[Show full text]
KJV 400 Years Contents the Thank God for the King James Bible 1 Founders Tom Ascol
FOUNDERS JOURNAL FROM FOUNDERS MINISTRIES | FALL 2011 | ISSUE 86 KJV 400 Years Contents The Thank God for the King James Bible 1 Founders Tom Ascol “Zeal to Promote the Common Good” The Story of the King James Bible 2 Journal Michael A. G. Haykin Committed to historic Baptist principles The Geneva Bible and Its Influence on the King James Bible 16 Matthew Barrett Issue 86 Fall 2011 Excerpts to the Translator’s Preface to the KJV 1611 29 News 15 Review of The Pilgrim’s Progress: A Docudrama 32 Ken Puls KJV 400 Years CONTRIBUTORS: Dr Tom Ascol is Senior Pastor of Grace Baptist Church in Cape Coral, FL and author of the Founders Ministries Blog: http://blog.founders.org/ Matthew Barrett is a PhD candidate at Te Southern Baptist Teological Seminary, Louisville, KY. Dr Michael Haykin is Professor of Church History and Biblical Spirituality at Te Southern Baptist Teological Seminary in Louisville, KY. Cover photo by Ken Puls TheFounders Journal Editor: Thomas K. Ascol Associate Editor: Tom J. Nettles Design Editor: Kenneth A. Puls Contributing Editors: Bill Ascol, Timothy George, Fred Malone, Joe Nesom, Phil Newton, Don Whitney, Hal Wynn. The Founders Journal is a quarterly publication which takes as its theological framework the first recognized confession of faith which Southern Baptists produced, The Abstract of Principles. See page 1 for important subscription information. Please send all inquiries and correspondence to: [email protected] Or you may write to: )/(,-5 )/,(&5R5885)25gkfoig5R5*5),&65 5iiogk Or contact us by phone at (239) 772-1400 or fax at (239) 772-1140.
[Show full text]
The Influence of William Tyndale's Translations
THE AUTHORISED VERSION: The Influence of William Tyndale’s Translations Dr. Jonathan D. Moore 21st May at Magdelan College, Oxford Introduction In this 400th anniversary year of the Authorised Version, it is most fitting that much is said in praise of that climactic English Bible version, and I therefore count it a pleasure as well as an honour that the Trinitarian Bible Society should have invited me to make my own small contribution to this series of commemorative lectures. Yet as great as the Authorised Version may be, even the AV translators themselves indicate in their preface Translators to the Reader that their contribution was not to forge any new path in their production of a new Bible version, but simply, as they put it, ‘to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principal good one’.1 If you have a copy of the Authorised Version in front of you, you will see from the title page that the translators, typical of all Renaissance Bible translators, were all the while ‘diligently comparing and revising the former translations’ so that the resulting product was, in their own words not ‘a new Translation’ at all. Overshadowing all these preceding versions was the revolutionary translation work of William Tyndale. It is hard to overstate the deep influence of Tyndale upon all subsequent English Bible translations even up until the 21st century, and this is not simply because he had the first bite at the cherry, but rather that, in the remarkable providence of God, the man raised up to translate the Scriptures from the original Greek and Hebrew into the English tongue for the first time was an eminently godly scholar who was nothing short of a genius and a master of the English language.
[Show full text]
The Holy Gospel of Jesus Christ, According to Matthew
The Holy Gospel Of Jesus Christ, According To Matthew The Argument In this History written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, the Spirit of God so governed their hearts, that although they were four in number, yet in effect and purpose they so consent, as though the whole had been composed by any one of them. And albeit in style and manner of writing they be divers, and sometime one writeth more largely that which the other doth abridge; nevertheless in matter and argument, they all tend to one end; which is to publish to the world the favor of God toward mankind through Christ Jesus, whom the father hath given as a pledge of his mercy and love. And for this cause they entitle their story Gospel, which signifieth good tidings, for as such as God hath performed indeed that which the fathers hoped for. So that hereby we are admonished to forsake the world, and the vanities thereof, and with most affectioned hearts embrace this incomparable treasure freely offered unto us, for there is no joy nor consolation, no peace nor quietness, no felicity nor salvation, but in Jesus Christ, who is the very substance of this Gospel, and in whom all the promises are Yea, and Amen. And therefore under this word is contained the whole New Testament; but commonly we use this name for the history, which the four Evangelists write, containing Christ’s coming in the flesh, his death, and resurrection, which is the perfect sum of our salvation. Matthew, Mark, and Luke are more copious in describing his life and death; but John more laboreth to set forth his doctrine, wherein both Christ’s office, and also the virtue of his death and resurrection more fully appear; for without this, to know that Christ was born, dead, and risen again, should nothing profit us.
[Show full text]
Chart of the English Bible
CHART OF THE ENGLISH BIBLE Elliott #1 02 evised 24 Oct 91 HEBREW OLD TESTAMENT ORIGNALTEXTS -;) TRANSLATIONS MADE DIRECTLY FROM fsi) THE GREEK AND HEBREW TEXTS GREEK TRANSLATIONS FROM LATIN SEPTUAGINT Delitzsch's 3rd Century B.C. HT in Hebrew (1875) REVISIONS OF EARLIER TRANSLATIONS R.Lindsey's A B. C. In all Revisions tbe Greek and Hebrew Texts are jj_p_gli TRANSLATION OF consulted THE GOSPEL A. D. OF Mark (1969) GREEK NEW TESTAMENT — A.D. 100 As you might guess, THE BIBLE is the world's N JEROME'S only everywhere & all-languages book LATIN VULGATE (in about 1,400 tongues, covering about 98% of humanity). 382-405 Running day & night, the presses can't keep up with the Bible-hunger in formerly communist countries. The United Bible Societies of the world supply =mow the Scriptures at cost, & there are hosts of commercial publishers. 735 FREE CATALOGS: American Bible Society 1865 B'wax, NY, NY 10023 International Bible bociety Box 62970, Colo.Springs, CO 80962-2970 ON ENGLISH-BIBLE VERSIONS & TRANSLATIONS: K.Sakae & W.Specht, SO MANY VERSIONS? (20th-c.) Zonderdan/75 J.P.Lewish, THE ENGLISH BIBLE FROM KJV TO NIV: A HISTORY & EVALUATION (Cambridge/91) R.A.Henshaw, WHICH BIBLE? (assessment of 12, in 44pp., 900 (Foreward Movement/90) INVENTION 07NTING - 1456 1384, 1395 LUTHER'S GERMAN BIBLE - 1522, 1534 TYNDALE'S 1530-1531 Part of 0. New Testament 1525 COVERDALE S EIBLE - 1535 MATTHEW'S BIBLE - 1537 GREAT BIBLE - 1539 GENEVA BIBLE - 1557, 1560 BISHOPS' BIBLE RHE' -IBLEF— - 1568 A- tWA004 1582, 1609-10 KING JAMES BIBLE - 1611 Additional posi -WWII Bibles: THE AMPLIFIED IBLE (1965) THE PLAIN ENGL SH NT, 1952-- rather similar to THE BASIC BIBL (1949) THE READER'S D GEST BIBLE (Bruce Metzger's condensation c f the RSV; probable: NRSV) CHALLONER'S REVISION CHILDRENS' BIBL 3, 1990 I BIBLE FOR TODAY S FAMILY: NT, 1991 1749, 1750 --- The Internatio gal Q Project of The Jesus Sem nar, 1991 & continuing (eg, JBL Fa 1/91, pp.494-8) --- THE LIVING BIB E, 1971 (Nath.
[Show full text]
The 1537 Matthew Bible: More Anglican Than Not Ruth Magnusson Davis, Founder and Editor, New Matthew Bible Project
The 1537 Matthew Bible: More Anglican than Not Ruth Magnusson Davis, founder and editor, New Matthew Bible Project “Like any good Anglican, the Matthew Bible found itself caught between the Roman Catholics and the Puritans .” hen the sixteenth century dawned in England, there were laws prohibiting the translation of the Bible into W English. It was illegal even to own or to read English Scriptures.1 These laws had been passed by Roman Catholic authorities in response to the Bible translations of John Wycliffe in the late fourteenth century, and were zealously enforced. The poor souls who dared to defy them were imprisoned, tortured, and burned at the stake. In the face of this danger and persecution, God moved three A Lollard Prison friends to give us a little-known English Bible, the Matthew Bible (‘MB’), first published in 1537. William Tyndale translated the New Testament and the first half of the Old, while Myles Coverdale contributed the other Scriptures and the Apocryphal books. The third man, John Rogers, compiled their work, added com- mentaries and other features that we will see, and oversaw production. The Matthew Bible is important because, among other things, it is the “real primary version of our English Bible.”2 It formed the base of the Great Bible, which was a minor revision that Coverdale himself performed. From there, it went also into the Geneva, Bishops’, and King James Versions, where it underwent further revisions. But a com- puter study has revealed just how much of Tyndale remains in the KJV: New Testament scholars Jon Nielson and Royal Skousen observed that previous estimates of Tyndale’s contribution to the KJV “have run from a high of up to 90% (Westcott) to a low of 18% (Butterworth)”.
[Show full text]
Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET Etc. Are the New "Catholic" Bibles
Undeniable Proof the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET etc. are the new "Catholic" bibles “Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins” Revelation 18:4 Bible critics (none of whom believes that any Bible in any language IS the complete, inspired and 100% historically true words of God) often attack King James Bible believers for using a Bible with "Roman Catholic" roots. For example Doug Kutilek's “Is the King James Version a Roman Catholic Bible?” Recently I was at a Christian Forum on Facebook and I got more than a couple of remarks like: “Well, we can thank the Catholic church for the King James Bible” or “you wouldn't have the KJV without the RCC. They sponsored Erasmus (RC scholar) who rushed the manuscripts which are the basis for the the KJV.” Their argument goes something like this: the Textus Receptus Greek text was edited by Erasmus, the King James New Testament was based upon the Textus Receptus. Erasmus was a loyal Roman Catholic so the King James Bible has strong Catholic roots. As usual, the KJB critics’ argument is misinformed, deeply biased and misapplied. Learn more about the man Erasmus and his theology here: http://www.wayoflife.org/database/erasmus.html The most important point to note is that what is called the Textus Receptus was NOT the basis for the Catholic Bibles, but rather for the Reformation Bibles like Luther’s German Bible, the French Olivetan, the Italian Diodati, the Spanish Reina Valera, the English Geneva Bible and of course the King James Holy Bible.
[Show full text]
The Story of the Bible
Lecture Eighteen The King James Version Scope: Just as Jerome’s translation of the Vulgate brought some order to the chaotic world of ancient Latin translations, so did the Authorized Version of the Bible ordered by King James I of England in 1604 have a similar effect in stabilizing the English Bible. The process by which this revision (not really a fresh translation) was carried out set a pattern for future efforts. It involved teams of scholars who were experts in the original languages, seeking a mediating path among existing translations, among which that of Tyndale exercised the greatest influence. The translation appeared in 1611 (including the Apocrypha) and immediately won widespread approval because of its outstanding literary merit. Outline I. The Authorized Version, or the King James Version (KJV), of the Bible came about as an attempt to standardize a chaotic state of affairs. A. Several English translations vied for primacy in the late 16th and early 17th centuries. 1. The Geneva Bible appeared in 1560, translated by William Whittingham. It was the first English version to have numbered chapters and verses. It had an introduction by John Calvin, and its many notes reflected a pro-reform and anti- Catholic bias (see the translation of congregation and elder). The Geneva Bible went through 140 printings before 1640 and was used by James I and the Puritans; it was the Bible of Bunyan and Shakespeare. 2. The Bishops’ Bible was authorized by Elizabeth I precisely to counter the Geneva Bible. Published in 1568, it retained traditional ecclesiastical terms, but it was less literarily impressive and popular (20 reprints before 1606).
[Show full text]