DOCSLIB.ORG

Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (FEMA)  Community Wildfire Protection Plan (DRED)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (FEMA)  Community Wildfire Protection Plan (DRED) This Plan integrates the following: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update (FEMA) Community Wildfire Protection Plan (DRED) April 3, 2017 Final (for Town Adoption) Prepared for the Town of Lyme and NH Homeland Security & Emergency Management By The Lyme Planning Team With assistance from Mapping and Planning Solutions Lyme Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2017 “Plans are worthless, but planning is everything. There is a very great distinction because when you are planning for an emergency you must start with this one thing: The very definition of "emergency" is that it is unexpected, therefore it is not going to happen the way you are planning.” -Dwight D. Eisenhower HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN DEFINITIONS ”A natural hazard is a source of harm or difficulty created by a meteorological, environmental, or geological event.” “Hazard mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from hazards (44CFR 201.2). Hazard mitigation activities may be implemented prior to, during, or after an event. However, it has been demonstrated that hazard mitigation is most effective when based on an inclusive, comprehensive, long-term plan that is developed before a disaster occurs.” (Source: Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide, FEMA, October 1, 2011) Plan Prepared and Authored By June E. Garneau, Owner/Planner Mapping and Planning Solutions 105 Union Street, Suite 1 Whitefield, NH 03598 [email protected] Cover: Downtown-Lyme, NH Photo Credit: http://www.upstatenh.com/LymeNH.htmi Page 2 Lyme Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2017 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 1: HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................................ 9 A. AUTHORITY & FUNDING ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 B. PURPOSE & HISTORY OF THE FEMA MITIGATION PLANNING PROCESS .................................................................................................. 9 C. JURISDICTION............................................................................................................................................................................ 10 D. SCOPE OF THE PLAN & FEDERAL & STATE PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................................. 10 E. PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ......................................................................................................................................... 11 F. INCORPORATION OF EXISTING PLANS, STUDIES, REPORTS AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION .......................................................................... 13 G. HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING PROCESS & METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 14 H. HAZARD MITIGATION BUILDING BLOCKS & TABLES.......................................................................................................................... 15 I. HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 J. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS ...................................................................................................................................... 17 CHAPTER 2: COMMUNITY PROFILE ...................................................................................................................................... 25 A. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................................... 25 B. EMERGENCY SERVICES ................................................................................................................................................................ 26 C. LYME’S CURRENT & FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS ....................................................................................................................... 27 Table 2.1: Town Statistics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 28 CHAPTER 3: HAZARD IDENTIFICATION................................................................................................................................. 31 A. DESCRIPTION OF THE HAZARDS .................................................................................................................................................... 31 Table 3.1: Hazard Threat Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 32 B. RISK ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................................................................................................... 33 C. LYME NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP) STATUS ......................................................................................................... 33 D. PROFILE OF PAST, PRESENT & POTENTIAL WILDFIRE EVENTS IN LYME ................................................................................................. 36 E. PROBABILITY OF FUTURE POTENTIAL DISASTERS .............................................................................................................................. 36 Table 3.2: Historic Hazard Identification................................................................................................................................................... 38 CHAPTER 4: CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE & KEY RESOURCES (CIKR) ..................................................................................... 45 Table 4.1 - Emergency Response Facilities (ERF) & Evacuation ................................................................................................................. 45 Table 4.2 – Non- Emergency Response Facilities (NERF) ........................................................................................................................... 46 Table 4.3 – Facilities & Populations to Protect (FPP) ................................................................................................................................. 47 Table 4.4 – Potential Resources (PR) ......................................................................................................................................................... 47 CHAPTER 5: HAZARD EFFECTS IN LYME ............................................................................................................................... 49 A. IDENTIFYING VULNERABLE STRUCTURES ......................................................................................................................................... 49 B. CALCULATING THE POTENTIAL LOSS .............................................................................................................................................. 49 C. NATURAL HAZARDS ................................................................................................................................................................... 50 D. HUMAN-CAUSED HAZARDS ......................................................................................................................................................... 56 Page 3 Lyme Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2017 CHAPTER 6: CURRENT POLICIES, PLANS & MUTUAL AID ...................................................................................................... 59 Table 6.1: Current Policies, Plans & Mutual Aid ........................................................................................................................................ 59 CHAPTER 7: PRIOR MITIGATION PLAN................................................................................................................................. 69 A. DATE OF PRIOR PLAN ................................................................................................................................................................. 69 Table 7.1: Accomplishments since the Prior Plan Approval ...................................................................................................................... 70 CHAPTER 8: NEW MITIGATION STRATEGIES & STAPLEE ...................................................................................................... 71 A. MITIGATION STRATEGIES BY TYPE ................................................................................................................................................. 71 B. POTENTIAL MITIGATION STRATEGIES BY HAZARD ............................................................................................................................. 72 C. STAPLEE METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................................... 74 D. TEAM’S UNDERSTANDING OF HAZARD
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • GRANIT 7.5' Quad Tile Index 1 2 3
    GRANIT 7.5' Quad Tile Index 1 2 3 1 GREELEY BROOK 108 DANBURY 4 5 6 7 2 PROSPECT HILL 109 BRISTOL PITTSBURG 3 MOOSE BOG 110 WINNISQUAM LAKE 4 METALLAK MOUNTAIN 111 LACONIA 5 COWEN HILL 112 WEST ALTON 6 SECOND CONNECTICUT LAKE 113 WOLFEBORO 8 9 10 11 7 RUMP MTN 114 SANBORNVILLE 8 PITTSBURG 115 GREAT EAST LAKE CLARKSVILLE ATKINSON & 9 LAKE FRANCIS 116 WINDSOR GILMANTON 10 MAGALLOWAY MOUNTAIN 117 CLAREMONT NORTH 11 BOSEBUCK MTN 118 GRANTHAM STEWARTSTOWN 12 13 14 15T SECOND 16 12 MONADNOCK MTN, VT-NH 119 SUNAPEE LAKE NORTH N A COLLEGE R G GRANT 13 LOVERING MOUNTAIN 120 NEW LONDON COLEBROOK S ' X DIXVILLE I 14 DIAMOND POND 121 ANDOVER D 15 MOUNT PISGAH 122 FRANKLIN 16 WILSONS MILLS 123 NORTHFIELD WENTWORTHS COLUMBIA LOCATION 17 BLOOMFIELD 124 BELMONT 17 18 1ER9VINGS 20 21 22 18 TINKERVILLE 125 GILMANTON IRON WORKS LOCATION 19 BLUE MOUNTAIN 126 ALTON MILLSFIELD ERROL 20 DIXVILLE NOTCH 127 FARMINGTON 21 ERROL 128 MILTON ODELL 22 UMBAGOG LAKE NORTH 129 SPRINGFIELD STRATFORD 23 MAIDSTONE LAKE 130 CLAREMONT SOUTH 23 24 25 26 27 28 DUMMER 24 STRATFORD 131 NEWPORT CAMBRIDGE 25 PERCY PEAKS 132 SUNAPEE LAKES D N A 26 DUMMER PONDS 133 BRADFORD L R E B 27 TEAKETTLE RIDGE 134 WARNER M STARK U H 28 UMBAGOG LAKE SOUTH 135 WEBSTER T MILAN R 29 O 30 31 32 33 29 GROVETON 136 PENACOOK N 30 STARK 137 LOUDON Y 31 WEST MILAN 138 PITTSFIELD N N E K BERLIN SUCCESS L 32 MILAN 139 PARKER MOUNTAIN I LANCASTER K 33 SUCCESS POND 140 BAXTER LAKE 34 MILES POND 141 ROCHESTER 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 35 LANCASTER W 142 SOMERSWORTH GORHAM RANDOLPH D A L T O N JEFFERSON 36 LANCASTER E 143 BELLOWS FALLS SHELBURNE 37 PLINY RANGE W 144 ALSTEAD WHITEFIELD 38 PLINY RANGE E 145 EAST LEMPSTER MARTINS 39 BERLIN 146 WASHINGTON LITTLETON CARROLL LOW & LOCATION & .
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 FS Legacy.Qxd4.0
    United States Department of Agriculture Forestry Legacy Program Forest Service Forestry Legacy Program National Report Legacy Program Forestry 2004 for Fiscal Year National Report for FS-816 December 2004 Fiscal Year 2004 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Legacy Program Forest Service National Report for FS-816 December 2004 Fiscal Year 2004 For more information, contact the following: Director, Cooperative Forestry 202–205–1389 Forest Legacy Program Manager 202–205–1469 Web site: http://www.fs.fed.us/spf/coop/programs/loa/flp.shtml Photo Credits Cover and page 7: Nicatous Lake in Hancock County, Maine, courtesy of Alan Hutchinson. Back cover and page 2: Wooden Fence in Bar J, Utah, courtesy of Ann Price. Page i: View from Homestead, Colorado, courtesy of Susan Gray. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activi- ties on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To f ile a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720- 5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Message From Larry Payne, Director, Cooperative Forestry Forests provide communities with a variety of benefits, including jobs, timber and other forest products, healthy water supplies, recreational opportunities, cultural and historic resources, habitat, carbon sequestration, and aesthetics and scenic views, just to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • FFLA 2015 New Hampshire Chapter Report
    FFLA 2015 New Hampshire Chapter Report The New Hampshire Chapter regained one former member in June. At the end of the year there were six FFLA Plus members and twelve Regular members for a total of 18 paid members and two complimentary memberships (White Mountain National Forest and NH Forest Protection Bureau.) There were no chapter activities during the year. The State continued staffing its towers only during Class 3 (high) and higher fire danger weather. The State hired contractors who did extensive rehabilitation work at Green Mountain where a new cab was installed on the tower and at Mt. Prospect where renovations will finish up in 2016. New tower cabs are planned for Warner Hill and Pitcher Mountain. In September Historicorps experts visited Smarts Mountain tower in Lyme, NH on the Appalachian Trail. Plans are underway to replace the tower cab roof and make repairs to the watchman’s cabin during 2016. Fire activity was high during April and May as reported in the Lookout Network. 98 Fires burned 595 acres during the year with most occurring in the spring. The largest fire was 275 acres which was more acres than burned during the past two years combined! Both the State of New Hampshire and the White Mountain National Forest sent several crews and many single resources out of state to help suppress fires in the western states. A few folks were lucky enough to be on two fire crews. The White Mountain National Forest took delivery of a second Type 6 Wildland Fire engine during the summer. This engine replaces one purchased in 2003 which had become outdated.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy, Geochronology, and Accretionary Terrane Settings of Two Bronson Hill Arc Sequences, Northern New England
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2003 Stratigraphy, geochronology, and accretionary terrane settings of two Bronson Hill arc sequences, northern New England Robert H. Moench U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] John N. Aleinikoff U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Moench, Robert H. and Aleinikoff, John N., "Stratigraphy, geochronology, and accretionary terrane settings of two Bronson Hill arc sequences, northern New England" (2003). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 436. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/436 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28 (2003) 113–160 www.elsevier.com/locate/pce Stratigraphy, geochronology, and accretionary terrane settings of two Bronson Hill arc sequences, northern New England q,qq Robert H. Moench a,*, John N. Aleinikoff b a US Geological Survey, MS 905, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA b US Geological Survey, MS 963, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA Abstract The Ammonoosuc Volcanics, Partridge Formation, and the Oliverian and Highlandcroft Plutonic Suites of the Bronson Hill anticlinorium (BHA) in axial New England are widely accepted as a single Middle to Late Ordovician magmatic arc that was active during closure of Iapetus.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Trail Vital Signs
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Region Boston, Massachusetts Appalachian Trail Vital Signs Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2005/026 ON THE COVER Androscoggin River, ME Blood Mountain Sunset, GA Laurel Falls, TN Mt Katahdin, ME © Photos by Joe Cook Appalachian Trail Vital Signs Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2005/026 Greg Shriver1, Tonnie Maniero2, Kent Schwarzkopf3, Dan Lambert4, Fred Dieffenbach1, Don Owen3, Y. Q. Wang5, Joy Nugranad- Marzilli5, Geri Tierney6, Casey Reese3, Theresa T. Moore1 1National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program 54 Elm Street Woodstock, Vermont 05091 2National Park Service Northeast Region 15 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 3National Park Service Appalachian National Scenic Trail Harpers Ferry Center Harpers Ferry, West Virginia 25425 4Vermont Institute of Natural Science Conservation Biology Department 2723 Church Hill Road Woodstock, Vermont 05091 5University of Rhode Island Department of Natural Resource Science Kingston, Rhode Island 02881 6State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, New York 13210 November 2005 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region Boston, Massachusetts The Northeast Region of the National Park Service (NPS) comprises national parks and related areas in 13 New England and Mid- Atlantic states. The diversity of parks and their resources are reflected in their designations as national parks, seashores, historic sites, recreation areas, military parks, memorials, and rivers and trails. Biological, physical, and social science research results, natural resource inventory and monitoring data, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences related to these park units are disseminated through the NPS/NER Technical Report (NRTR) and Natural Resources Report (NRR) series.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Trail Companion
    Appalachian Trail Thru-Hikers’ Companion Robert Sylvester Editor Harpers Ferry State iii Cover photograph: On Katahdin. © Valerie Long. Maps © 2009–2010 David Miller; revised in 2012 by Robert Sylvester © 2013 Appalachian Long Distance Hikers Association, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States on recycled paper Twentieth edition Published by the Appalachian Trail Conservancy 799 Washington Street (P.O. Box 807) Harpers Ferry, West Virginia 25425-0807 <www.appalachiantrail.org> Except for the individual personal uses suggested on page vii, no part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording or by any information storage-and-retrieval system, without the written permission of the Appalachian Long Distance Hikers Association, 10 Benning Street, PMB 224, West Lebanon, NH 03784. World Wide Web site: <www.aldha.org>. ISBN 978-1-889386-84-3 Th e sunrise logo on the previous page and the back cover is a registered trademark of the Appalachian Trail Conservancy. Th e hiker logo on the cover and the previous page is a registered trademark of the Appalachian Long Distance Hikers Association. iv Appalachian Trail Th ru-Hikers’ Companion–201 Foreword ............................................................................................................................. iv About the Companion ....................................................................................................... v Using the Companion......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Commission
    Stat� of New Hampshire BIENNIAL REPORT OF THE Forestry Commission FOR THE YEARS 1915 - 1916 Concord November, 1916 MANCHESTER, N. H. PBINTED BY JOHN D. CLARKE COMl'.l.NY 1916 1.'rint.ccl b.Y JouN n. CLARICE Co., Manchester Bound by G1w1mE G. NEAL, Do,·cr CONTENTS Page Introductory .................................. 5 Statement to the Governor and Council........... 5 Synopsis of growth and present status of state for- estry ................................... 6 Recommendations for improvement............ 10 The Forest Fire Se1·vice......................... 14 Forest fire damage and costs................... 14 Fire seasons of 1915 and 1916 ............... 14 Cost of fighting forest fires................... 15 Damage by forest fires..... .................. 16 Mountain lookout stations..................... 17 New stations constructed.................... 17 Operation of stations ........................ 18 Use of lookout watchmen for other work....... 19 Improvements in fire location maps............ 20 The panoramic relief alidade............... 21 The perfected lookout maps................ 22 Patrol service ............................... 23 New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association.. 23 Other patrol agencies-state road patrolmen, rm·al mail carriers, section foremen, town wardens .. 24 Prevention of railroad fires.................... 26 A change in policy......................... 26 Special prevention measures................. 28 Engine inspection .......................... 28 Patrolling right of way...................... 28 Fire, lines-the
    [Show full text]
  • Dartmouth/Lake Sunapee
    !"b$ Aà Aà ?¬ ?{ ?¬ V# V# A B C D E FAê G Lake Tarleton l i 5 a 2 Mount Cushman r T H .1 Lake Armington 3 8 . .1 N 1 30 c V# )" 8 e 1 Legend 5 1 R . H W O O D S T O C K 0 N W O O D S T O C K P I E R M O N T n DARTMOUTH P I E R M O N T 1 Bike Routes e r W r Mirror Lake W H a Recommended Bicycle Routes (Paved) H I W I T Recommended Bicycle Routes (Unpaved) LAKE SUNAPEE REGION 5 E WWAA RRRREE NN !"a$ . 1 4 Indian Pond M 1 M BAKER RIVER Advanced bicycle skills recommended (Paved) O N I H U N 2 N 5 BICYCLE ROUTES T A Advanced bicycle skills recommended (Unpaved) ?Ã A I 8 Improved Rail Trail (Paved or Stone Dust) r N . ch N Foxglove Pond TTHHOO RRNNTTOO NN er .6 3 0 to 4 NH R 1 w 6 E5 0 2.5 5 10 . 25 2E Unimproved Rail Trail rough surface H n 9 A G N R H G Ij d Three Ponds N I EELLLLSS WW OORRTT HH Pemigewasset River Miles 4 C° O PassPeenagkeerd S Heirllv Picoen Advailable . N 8 OORRFF OORRDD WHITE MOUNTAIN NATIONAL FOREST Aj Lower Baker Pond ?¬ Features 1 U Heath Pond S 0 5 . 1 Exit Numbers 3 0 4 Aê d d R Airports R 1 r Ellsworth Pond e 0 e iv .
    [Show full text]
  • RESULTS Rivers, Streams and Ponds
    Natural Resource Inventory for Lyme, NH RESULTS Rivers, Streams and Ponds Lyme contains about 1,033.8 acres of inland waters, including 8.3 miles bordering the Connecticut River. The Town’s largest waterbody, (with the exception of the Connecticut River), is Post Pond, which is just over 114 acres and can be seen from Route 10. Reservoir Pond, most of which is in Dorchester, is nearly 162 acres. The ponds offer excellent open water wildlife habitat as well as good recreation potential. Many are stocked with fish by New Hampshire Fish and Game Department. Pout Pond lies between Demmick Hill to its north and Flint Hill to the south. It is nearly 40 acres and its outlet feeds into Grant Brook. The Connecticut River is the largest river or stream in Lyme, flowing for 43,800 feet (8.3 miles) along the western boundary of Lyme. Being the largest river in New England, it was designated into the NH Rivers Management and Protection Program. It has also been designated an American Heritage River by President Clinton. Protecting its biological diversity and scenic value has been a priority for the states of NH and VT since the 1980’s. Town of Lyme 11 Natural Resource Inventory for Lyme, NH Edgell Covered Bridge on Clay Brook at the confluence with the Connecticut River. Built in 1885, it is 132 feet long. There are three main named stream systems. The first main complex consists of Trout Brook which originates on the west slope of Smarts Mountain and flows into Post Pond. The outflow of Post Pond is Clay Brook which flows north until its confluence with the Connecticut River.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or Country -- America -- North America -- United States -- Northe
    G3701.S UNITED STATES. HISTORY G3701.S .S1 General .S12 Discovery and exploration Including exploration of the West .S2 Colonial period .S26 French and Indian War, 1755-1763 .S3 Revolution, 1775-1783 .S4 1783-1865 .S42 War of 1812 .S44 Mexican War, 1845-1848 .S5 Civil War, 1861-1865 .S55 1865-1900 .S57 Spanish American War, 1898 .S6 1900-1945 .S65 World War I .S7 World War II .S73 1945- 88 G3702 UNITED STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, G3702 ETC. .C6 Coasts .G7 Great River Road .L5 Lincoln Highway .M6 Mormon Pioneer National Historic Trail. Mormon Trail .N6 North Country National Scenic Trail .U5 United States Highway 30 .U53 United States Highway 50 .U55 United States Highway 66 89 G3707 EASTERN UNITED STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3707 FEATURES, ETC. .A5 Appalachian Basin .A6 Appalachian Mountains .I4 Interstate 64 .I5 Interstate 75 .I7 Interstate 77 .I8 Interstate 81 .J6 John Hunt Morgan Heritage Trail .N4 New Madrid Seismic Zone .O5 Ohio River .U5 United States Highway 150 .W3 Warrior Trail 90 G3709.32 ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3709.32 FEATURES, ETC. .A6 Appalachian Trail .A8 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway .C6 Coasts .I5 Interstate 95 .O2 Ocean Hiway .P5 Piedmont Region .U5 United States Highway 1 .U6 United States Highway 13 91 G3712 NORTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3712 FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Coasts .C8 Cumberland Road .U5 United States Highway 22 92 G3717 NORTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3717 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .C6 Coasts .T3 Taconic Range .U5 United States Highway 202 93 G3722 NEW ENGLAND. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, G3722 ETC. .C6 Coasts .C62 Connecticut River 94 G3732 MAINE.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook for Field Trips in Central New Hampshire and Contiguous Areas
    DISCLAIMER Before visiting any of the sites described in the New England Intercollegiate Geological Conference guidebooks, you must obtain permission from the current landowners. Landowners only granted permission to visit these sites to the organizers of the original trips for the designated dates of the conference. It is your responsibility to obtain permission for your visit. Be aware that this permission may not be granted. Especially when using older guidebooks in this collection, note that locations may have changed drastically. Likewise, geological interpretations may differ from current understandings. Please respect any trip stops designated as “no hammers”, “no collecting” or the like. Consider possible hazards and use appropriate caution and safety equipment. NEIGC and the hosts of these online guidebooks are not responsible for the use or misuse of the guidebooks. ilnL(jszutu of JLiiPiaxij Ell, 3 4bOO 0Q^7^ 3D3M NEW ENGLAND INTERCOLLEGIATE GEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE GUIDEBOOK for field trips in Central New Hampshire and Contiguous Areas John B. Lyons Glenn W. Stewart Editors 63rd Annual Meeting October 2 and 3, 1971 Concord, New Hampshire o > Conference Organization Herbert Tischler Glenn W. Stewart John B. Lyons Dabney M. Caldwell, Secretary, New England Intercollegiate Geological Conference Field Trip Leaders Franz E. Anderson, University of New Hampshire, Durham, N.H. Wallace A. Bothner , University of New Hampshire, Durham, N.H. Russell G. Clark, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H. Evan Englund, Dartmouth College, Hanover, N. H. Henri E. Gaudette, University of New Hampshire, Durham, N.H. Richard P. Goldthwait, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Robert C. Greene, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
    [Show full text]