Stratigraphy, Geochronology, and Accretionary Terrane Settings of Two Bronson Hill Arc Sequences, Northern New England

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Stratigraphy, Geochronology, and Accretionary Terrane Settings of Two Bronson Hill Arc Sequences, Northern New England View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2003 Stratigraphy, geochronology, and accretionary terrane settings of two Bronson Hill arc sequences, northern New England Robert H. Moench U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] John N. Aleinikoff U.S. Geological Survey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Moench, Robert H. and Aleinikoff, John N., "Stratigraphy, geochronology, and accretionary terrane settings of two Bronson Hill arc sequences, northern New England" (2003). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 436. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/436 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28 (2003) 113–160 www.elsevier.com/locate/pce Stratigraphy, geochronology, and accretionary terrane settings of two Bronson Hill arc sequences, northern New England q,qq Robert H. Moench a,*, John N. Aleinikoff b a US Geological Survey, MS 905, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA b US Geological Survey, MS 963, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225, USA Abstract The Ammonoosuc Volcanics, Partridge Formation, and the Oliverian and Highlandcroft Plutonic Suites of the Bronson Hill anticlinorium (BHA) in axial New England are widely accepted as a single Middle to Late Ordovician magmatic arc that was active during closure of Iapetus. Mapping and U–Pb dating indicate, however, that the BHAcontains two volcano-sedimentary-intrusive sequences of probable opposite subduction polarity, here termed the Ammonoosuc and Quimby sequences. The Ammonoosuc sequence is defined by the Middle Ordovician Ammonoosuc Volcanics near Littleton, NH, the type area, northeast to Milan, NH, and Oquossoc, ME; it also includes black slate of the Partridge Formation (C.bicornis ––zone graptolites, 457 Ma). Related metamorphosed intrusives are the tonalitic Joslin Turn pluton (469 Æ 2 Ma), the Cambridge Black granitic pluton (468 Æ 3 Ma), and gabbro, tonalite (467 Æ 4 Ma), and sheeted diabase of the Chickwolnepy intrusions. These intrusives cut lowermost Ammonoosuc (therefore >469 Ma). Probable uppermost Ammonoosuc is dated at 465 Æ 6 and 461 Æ 8 Ma. Successively below the Ammonoosuc are the Dead River and Hurricane Mountain Formations (flysch and melange), and the Jim Pond Formation (484 Æ 5 Ma) and Boil Mountain Complex (both ophiolite), which are structurally underlain by the Neoproterozoic(?) Chain Lakes massif. The Quimby sequence is defined by the Lower Silurian(?) to Upper Ordovician Quimby Formation, composed of bimodal vol- canics (443 Æ 4 Ma) and sulfidic shale and graywacke that lie conformably to unconformably above the Ammmonoosuc Volcanics and Partridge Formation. Also in the Quimby sequence are several granitic to sparsely gabbroic plutons of the Highlandcroft (441– 452 Ma) and Oliverian (435–456 Ma) Plutonic Suites, which intrude the Dead River, Ammonoouc and Partridge, but not the Quimby Formation. Based on faunal, paleolatitude, and isotopic data, the Ammonoosuc sequence and its correlatives and underlying sequences formed off the southern Laurentian margin, but northwest of the principal Iapetan suture, or Red Indian line. The Boil Mountain- Jim Pond-Hurricane Mountain sequence was ramped northwestward over the Chain Lakes massif at 475 Ma, on the basal Boil Mountain surface. This obduction probably occurred slightly before obduction on the Baie Vert-Brompton surface (BBL), farther NW, over the Laurentian margin, and was followed by Dead River flysch sedimentation, which ended with the abrupt onset of Ammonoosuc-sequence arc magmatism at 470 Ma. Ammonoosuc eruptions probably ended at 460 Ma, when Iapetus closed along the Red Indian line. During a following magmatic hiatus of 3–5 m.y., now represented by portions of the Partridge Formation that overlie the Ammonoosuc Volcanics, subduction polarity reversed, and subduction resumed below the northwest-dipping Brunswick subduction complex (BSC) of New Brunswick, Canada. Quimby-sequence magmatism (456–435 Ma) on the newly accreted Laurentian margin occurred above the BSC, whose footwall is now buried to the southeast by mainly Silurian clastic sediments of the Merrimack- Fredericton trough, deposited in the ‘‘Fredericton Sea’’. In Silurian to Early Devonian time, the NW-dipping BSC footwall was paired with a SE-dipping subduction zone that produced arc magmas of the Coastal Volcanic belt, built on the composite Avalon and adjacent peri-Avalonian terranes. Orogen-normal extension produced by rapid rollback of both subduction zones narrowed the Fredericton Sea, produced the Central Maine and Connecticut Valley-Gaspeebasins, and culminated in the Acadian orogeny when the sea completely closed in Early Devonian time. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. q PII of original article S1474-7065(01)00003-1; doi of erratum article 10.1016/S1474-7065(03)00013-5. qq Publication authorized by the Director, US Geological Survey. * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-303-236-5651; fax: +1-303-236-7884. E-mail address: [email protected] (R.H. Moench). 1474-7065/03/$ - see front matter Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. doi:10.1016/S1474-7065(03)00012-3 114 R.H. Moench, J.N. Aleinikoff / Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28 (2003) 113–160 1. Introduction during accretion to another terrane. Accordingly, post- accretionary deposits cannot enter into the definition of This paper attempts to relate our understanding of an accreted terrane; they may (and do) cross terrane Early Paleozoic stratigraphy and geochronology in boundaries. northern New Hampshire and western central Maine The detailed focus of this paper is on the stratigraphy (Figs. 1 and 2) to the Late Cambrian(?) to Early Dev- and plutonic geology exposed in the northern portion of onian plate-tectonic evolution of a larger part of the the Bronson Hill belt (Figs. 2–4), which includes parts of northern Appalachians. In order to accomplish this task the Bronson Hill anticlinorium mainly north of the 44th it was necessary to investigate earlier depictions of ac- parallel, and contiguous parts of the Boundary Moun- creted terrane structure (e.g. Zen, 1989; Stewart et al., tains and Lobster Mountain anticlinoriums. Based on 1993) and to derive a terrane delineation that accom- mapping and U–Pb geochronology, we propose that the modates the evidence as we see it. Fig. 1 shows the re- Bronson Hill arc of other researchers (e.g. Stanley and sults; supporting evidence and arguments are given Ratcliffe, 1985; Tucker and Robinson, 1990; Robinson below in the ‘‘Proposed delineation of accreted terr- et al., 1998) is actually composed of two, probably un- anes’’ section. Our compilation of terrane structure was related volcano-sedimentary-intrusive sequences, here guided by the principle that an accreted terrane consists informally referred to as the Ammonoosuc sequence of continental and/or oceanic basement and covering (Middle Ordovician, composed of the Ammonoosuc deposits and intrusives that were emplaced before or Volcanics and the Joslin Turn and Cambridge Black Fig. 1. Proposed basement terranes, sutures, and superimposed tectonic features of northern New England and mainland Canada. See ‘‘Proposed delineation of accreted terranes’’ in text. States of USA––MA, Massachusetts; NH, New Hampshire; VT, Vermont. Explanation righthand map: Proposed accreted terranes, magmatic arcs, and plate sutures. Terranes: LA, Laurentia (Humber zone). T1, terrane 1 (NW part of Notre Dame zone); Chain Lakes massif (CLM), and correlatives at Riviere des Plante (RP), Mont Serpentine (MS), and Nadeau (N), Quebec. T2, terrane 2 (SE part of Notre Dame zone). T3, terrane 3 (Exploits and Gander zones, undivided), showing locations of Casco Bay belt, CB, Massabesic Gneiss Complex, MG, and Dry Hill and related gneisses of Pelham dome, DHG. AV, composite Avalon ‘‘proper’’ and adjacent peri-Avalonian belts; tentatively includes Meguma terrane, MEG, and Putnam–Nashoba belt, NS. Arcs and subduction complexes: SFA, Shelburne Falls arc; BH, superposed arcs (Ammonoosuc + Quimby) of Bronson Hill belt; CVA, coastal volcanic arc; BSC, Brunswick subduction complex; PSC, Penobscot suduction complex. Sutures: BBL, Baie Verte-Brompton line. BML, Boil Mountain line. RIL, proposed buried Red Indian line. RILa, alternative placement of RIL. NBL, New Brunswick line; proposed occluded divergent subduction boundaries buried under FT and MT. Lefthand map: includes BBL from righthand map, Anticlinoria: approximate crestline––SMA, Stoke Mountain; BHA, Bronson Hill; BMA, Boundary Mountains; LMA, Lobster Mountain; MWA, Munsungun-Winterville; LSA, Lunksoos; MA, Miramichi. Sedimentary troughs: approximate troughline––CVGT, Connecticut Valley-Gaspee; CMMT, Central Maine-Matapedia; FT MT, Fredericton and Merrimack. Silurian tectonic hinge: STH, arrows point to thicker Silurian deposits of CMMT. Faults: NFS, Norumbega fault system; CN, Clinton-Newbury; BB, Bloody Bluff, Sp, Sennebec Pond. ! 1 Southeast edge of Grenville basement: 1, Stewart et al. (1993); 2, Hughes and Luetgert (1991); 3, Ando et al. (1984). X h Vms deposits having strongly radiogenic lead: Xh,
Recommended publications
  • The Bedrock Geology and Fracture Characterization of the Maynard Quadrangle of Eastern Massachusetts
    The Bedrock Geology and Fracture Characterization of the Maynard Quadrangle of Eastern Massachusetts Author: Tracey A. Arvin Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/1731 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2010 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Department of Geology and Geophysics THE BEDROCK GEOLOGY AND FRACTURE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAYNARD QUADRANGLE OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS a thesis by TRACEY ANNE ARVIN submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science December 2010 © copywrite by TRACEY ANNE ARVIN 2010 ABSTRACT The bedrock geology of the Maynard quadrangle of east-central Massachusetts was examined through field and petrographic studies and mapped at a scale of 1:24,000. The quadrangle spans much of the Nashoba terrane and a small area of the Avalon terrane. Two stratigraphic units were defined in the Nashoba terrane: the Cambrian to Ordovician Marlboro Formation and the Ordovician Nashoba Formation. In addition, four igneous units were defined in the Nashoba terrane: the Silurian to Ordovician phases of the Andover Granite, the Silurian to Devonian Assabet Quartz Diorite, the Silurian to Devonian White Pond Diorites (new name), and the Mississippian Indian Head Hill Igneous Complex. In the Avalon terrane, one stratigraphic unit was defined as the Proterozoic Z Westboro Formation Mylonites, and one igneous unit was defined as the Proterozoic Z to Devonian Sudbury Valley Igneous Complex. Two major faults were identified: the intra-terrane Assabet River fault zone in the central part of the quadrangle, and the south-east Nashoba terrane bounding Bloody Bluff fault zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Industries and Geology of Certain Areas
    REPORT -->/ OF TFIE STATE GEOLOGIST ON THE S 7 (9 Mineral Industries and Geology 12 of Certain Areas OF -o VERMONT. 'I 6 '4 4 7 THIRD OF THIS SERIES, 1901-1902. 4 0 4 S GEORGE H. PERKINS, Ph. D., 2 5 State Geologist and Professor of Geology, University of Vermont 7 8 9 0 2 4 9 1 T. B. LYON C0MI'ANV, I'RINTERS, ALILiNY, New VORK. 1902. CONTENTS. PG K 1NTRODFCTION 5 SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF ZADOCK THOMPSON, G. H. Perkins ----------------- 7 LIST OF OFFICIAL REPORTS ON VERMONT GEOLOGY ----------------- -- -- ----- 14 LIST OF OTHER PUBLICATIONS ON VERMONT GEOLOGY ------- - ---------- ----- 19 SKETCH OF THE LIFE OF AUGUSTUS WING, H. M. Seely -------------------- -- 22 REPORT ON MINERAL INDUSTRIES, G. H. Perkins ............................ 35 Metallic Products ------------------------------------------------------ 32 U seful Minerals ------------------------------------------------------- 35 Building and Ornamental Stone ----------------------------------------- 40 THE GRANITE AREA OF BAItRE, G. I. Finlay------------------------------ --- 46 Topography and Surface Geology ------------------------------------ - -- 46 General Geology, Petrography of the Schists -------------------------- - -- 48 Description and Petrography of Granite Areas ----------------------------51 THE TERRANES OF ORANGE COUNTY, VERMONT, C. H. Richardson ------------ 6i Topography---------------------------- -............................. 6z Chemistry ------------------------------------------------------------66 Geology --------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • New Hampshire River Protection and Energy Development Project Final
    ..... ~ • ••. "'-" .... - , ... =-· : ·: .• .,,./.. ,.• •.... · .. ~=·: ·~ ·:·r:. · · :_ J · :- .. · .... - • N:·E·. ·w··. .· H: ·AM·.-·. "p• . ·s;. ~:H·1· ··RE.;·.· . ·,;<::)::_) •, ·~•.'.'."'~._;...... · ..., ' ...· . , ·....... ' · .. , -. ' .., .- .. ·.~ ···•: ':.,.." ·~,.· 1:·:,//:,:: ,::, ·: :;,:. .:. /~-':. ·,_. •-': }·; >: .. :. ' ::,· ;(:·:· '5: ,:: ·>"·.:'. :- .·.. :.. ·.·.···.•. '.1.. ·.•·.·. ·.··.:.:._.._ ·..:· _, .... · -RIVER~-PR.OT-E,CT.10-N--AND . ·,,:·_.. ·•.,·• -~-.-.. :. ·. .. :: :·: .. _.. .· ·<··~-,: :-:··•:;·: ::··· ._ _;· , . ·ENER(3Y~EVELOP~.ENT.PROJ~~T. 1 .. .. .. .. i 1·· . ·. _:_. ~- FINAL REPORT··. .. : .. \j . :.> ·;' .'·' ··.·.· ·/··,. /-. '.'_\:: ..:· ..:"i•;. ·.. :-·: :···0:. ·;, - ·:··•,. ·/\·· :" ::;:·.-:'. J .. ;, . · · .. · · . ·: . Prepared by ~ . · . .-~- '·· )/i<·.(:'. '.·}, •.. --··.<. :{ .--. :o_:··.:"' .\.• .-:;: ,· :;:· ·_.:; ·< ·.<. (i'·. ;.: \ i:) ·::' .::··::i.:•.>\ I ··· ·. ··: · ..:_ · · New England ·Rtvers Center · ·. ··· r "., .f.·. ~ ..... .. ' . ~ "' .. ,:·1· ,; : ._.i ..... ... ; . .. ~- .. ·· .. -,• ~- • . .. r·· . , . : . L L 'I L t. ': ... r ........ ·.· . ---- - ,, ·· ·.·NE New England Rivers Center · !RC 3Jo,Shet ·Boston.Massachusetts 02108 - 117. 742-4134 NEW HAMPSHIRE RIVER PRO'l'ECTION J\ND ENERGY !)EVELOPMENT PBOJECT . -· . .. .. .. .. ., ,· . ' ··- .. ... : . •• ••• \ ·* ... ' ,· FINAL. REPORT February 22, 1983 New·England.Rivers Center Staff: 'l'bomas B. Arnold Drew o·. Parkin f . ..... - - . • I -1- . TABLE OF CONTENTS. ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEMBERS . ~ . • • . .. • .ii EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • PROVENANCE and TECTONIC HISTORY of METAMORPHIC ROCKS of CENTRAL PARK and NEW YORK CITY Steven J
    PROVENANCE AND TECTONIC HISTORY OF METAMORPHIC ROCKS OF CENTRAL PARK AND NEW YORK CITY Steven J. Jaret1,2, Nicholas D. Tailby1, Keiji Hammond1, E. Troy Rasbury2, Kathleen Wooton2, E. DiPadova1,3, Lisa Smith1,3, Riley Smith1,3, Victoria Yuan1,3, and Noa Jaffe1,3 1Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY. 2Department of Geosciences, Stony Brook University. 3Department of Education, New York City. The rocks underlying much of New York City, frequently referred to as the “Manhattan Prong”, predominately consist of a series of metasedimentary units, which were originally deposited into the Iapetus Ocean and subsequently deformed and metamorphosed during the Taconic, Acadian, and Alleghenian Orogenies (Merguerian and Merguerian , 2014, 2016; van Staal and Barr, 2012). Despite extensive field mapping in parks around Manhattan and subsurface mapping in major infrastructure sites (i.e., building foundations and tunnels), these rocks have not been studied geochemically and isotopically and interpretation within the larger tectonic framework has largely been based on correlation with presumed equivalent units in Connecticut and New England. Here we present new detrital zircon and Nd isotope provenance analyses in the broader geologic context of Northern Appalachia. General Background The Manhattan Schist was originally defined by Hall, 1976 and has been the subject of great debate for nearly 50 years. Merguerian 2004; 2016 has subdivided the original “Manhattan Schist” of Hall into 3 subunits of schistose rocks. He correlated the third unit with the Hartland Schist in Connecticut and thus interpreted these to be fault-bounded schists which were juxtaposed during a middle Ordovician collision between the eastern margin of Laurentia and volcanic arcs (the so-called “Taconic Arc”).
    [Show full text]
  • See the Wildlife Action Plan Habitat Profile
    Appendix B: Habitats Floodplain Habitats Photo by Ben Kimball Acres in NH: 23,201 Percent of NH Area: >1 Acres Protected: 7656 Percent Protected: 33 Habitat Distribution Map Habitat Description Floodplains occur in river valleys adjacent to river channels and are prone to periodic flooding. Floodplains are often comprised of forests, oxbows, meadows, and thickets. The habitats, vegetation, and hydrologic regime of floodplains are strongly influenced by watershed size, gradient, and channel morphometry. Most open or partially wooded floodplain communities occur on low floodplains. Sloughs, oxbows, vernal pools, and other depressions in the floodplain tend to be inundated for longer periods than low floodplains (Sperduto 2011). Floodplain soils range from well‐drained coarse sand on levees to poorly drained silts and mucks in depressions, and tend to be moderately to strongly minerotrophic (Sperduto 2011). Montane/near‐boreal floodplains are found primarily along rivers in the White Mountains or northern New Hampshire, and have relatively high gradients and flashy flood regimes compared to other floodplain systems. Sugar maple (Acer saccharum) and balsam fir (Abies balsamea) are dominant trees, and riparian wetlands such as oxbows and sloughs are uncommon in these high‐ gradient floodplains. Major river silver maple floodplains occur primarily along the Connecticut and Merrimack Rivers, and occasionally on lower reaches of major tributaries. These floodplains are often interspersed with oxbow marshes and shrub communities. The forested areas are characterized by a canopy of silver maple (Acer saccharinum) over a lush herbaceous layer, with a sparse shrub layer. Temperate minor river floodplains are found along large streams and small rivers in central and New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan Appendix B-101 Appendix B: Habitats southern New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Geology of the Dobbin Summit-Clear Creek Area, Monitor
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF DIANE CAROL WISE for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology presented on August 13, 1976 Title: PALEOZOIC GEOLOGY OF THE DOBBIN SUMMIT- CLEAR CREEK AREA, MONITOR RANGE, NYiE COUNTY, NEVADA Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy son Paleozoic limestones, dolomites, quartz arenites, and other clastic rocks were mapped in the vicinity of Dobbin Summit and Clear Creek in the central Monitor Range. Sedimentary rock units present in this area represent the shallow-shelf eastern assemblage and basin and also the basin-slope facies of the traditional limestone- clastic assemblage. The four oldest, Ordovician, units were deposited in shallow shelf environments. The Lower Ordovician Goodwin Formation is composed of about 1200 feet of calcareous shales and thin-bedded limestones. The overlying Antelope Valley Limestone is about 500 feet thick and consists of wackestones, packstones, and rare algal grainstones.The Copenhagen Formation (135 feet thick) is the highest regressive deposit of sandstone, siltstone, and limestone below the transgressive Eureka Quartzite.The Eureka is a quartz arenite 181 feet thick, with an intercalated shallow marine dolomite member. The transition from shallow to deep water conditions can be seen in the change from algal boundstones to laminated lime mud- stones in the Hanson Creek Formation (190 feet thick).The super- jacent Roberts Mountains Formation (285 feet thick) is composed of lime mudstones and allodapic beds deposited in basinal, deep water conditions.During earliest Devonian
    [Show full text]
  • GRANIT 7.5' Quad Tile Index 1 2 3
    GRANIT 7.5' Quad Tile Index 1 2 3 1 GREELEY BROOK 108 DANBURY 4 5 6 7 2 PROSPECT HILL 109 BRISTOL PITTSBURG 3 MOOSE BOG 110 WINNISQUAM LAKE 4 METALLAK MOUNTAIN 111 LACONIA 5 COWEN HILL 112 WEST ALTON 6 SECOND CONNECTICUT LAKE 113 WOLFEBORO 8 9 10 11 7 RUMP MTN 114 SANBORNVILLE 8 PITTSBURG 115 GREAT EAST LAKE CLARKSVILLE ATKINSON & 9 LAKE FRANCIS 116 WINDSOR GILMANTON 10 MAGALLOWAY MOUNTAIN 117 CLAREMONT NORTH 11 BOSEBUCK MTN 118 GRANTHAM STEWARTSTOWN 12 13 14 15T SECOND 16 12 MONADNOCK MTN, VT-NH 119 SUNAPEE LAKE NORTH N A COLLEGE R G GRANT 13 LOVERING MOUNTAIN 120 NEW LONDON COLEBROOK S ' X DIXVILLE I 14 DIAMOND POND 121 ANDOVER D 15 MOUNT PISGAH 122 FRANKLIN 16 WILSONS MILLS 123 NORTHFIELD WENTWORTHS COLUMBIA LOCATION 17 BLOOMFIELD 124 BELMONT 17 18 1ER9VINGS 20 21 22 18 TINKERVILLE 125 GILMANTON IRON WORKS LOCATION 19 BLUE MOUNTAIN 126 ALTON MILLSFIELD ERROL 20 DIXVILLE NOTCH 127 FARMINGTON 21 ERROL 128 MILTON ODELL 22 UMBAGOG LAKE NORTH 129 SPRINGFIELD STRATFORD 23 MAIDSTONE LAKE 130 CLAREMONT SOUTH 23 24 25 26 27 28 DUMMER 24 STRATFORD 131 NEWPORT CAMBRIDGE 25 PERCY PEAKS 132 SUNAPEE LAKES D N A 26 DUMMER PONDS 133 BRADFORD L R E B 27 TEAKETTLE RIDGE 134 WARNER M STARK U H 28 UMBAGOG LAKE SOUTH 135 WEBSTER T MILAN R 29 O 30 31 32 33 29 GROVETON 136 PENACOOK N 30 STARK 137 LOUDON Y 31 WEST MILAN 138 PITTSFIELD N N E K BERLIN SUCCESS L 32 MILAN 139 PARKER MOUNTAIN I LANCASTER K 33 SUCCESS POND 140 BAXTER LAKE 34 MILES POND 141 ROCHESTER 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 35 LANCASTER W 142 SOMERSWORTH GORHAM RANDOLPH D A L T O N JEFFERSON 36 LANCASTER E 143 BELLOWS FALLS SHELBURNE 37 PLINY RANGE W 144 ALSTEAD WHITEFIELD 38 PLINY RANGE E 145 EAST LEMPSTER MARTINS 39 BERLIN 146 WASHINGTON LITTLETON CARROLL LOW & LOCATION & .
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Planimetric Bedrock Geologic Map of the Prescott Peninsula Equivalents
    arc- or back-arc-related tholeiitic basalts and rare andesites and metamorphosed hydrothermally altered Omo Oaf Preliminary Planimetric Bedrock Geologic Map of the Prescott Peninsula equivalents. Locally pillows, graded tuffs, agglomerates and other features are preserved even at Oaa Omos sillimanite grade. They are older than the overlying felsic member dated at 453 ±2 Ma, but the exact age Sf Omo Oaa is presently unknown. Similar rocks in northern New Hampshire (Moench and Aleinikoff, 2002; Rankin and Surroundings, Quabbin Reservoir Area, Massachusetts et al., 2007) are cut by the Joslin Turn pluton with an age of 469 ±2 Ma (late Arenig). More recent U–Pb Kempfield Oaa dating of felsic volcanics in the same area (Aleinikoff et al., 2015) suggests ages in the ranges 480–462 Omog and 458–445 Ma. U–Pb ages from 7 intrusions and 1 volcanic rock in west-central New Hampshire Anticline Geology by Peter Robinson (1959-2016) and his students, (Valley et al., 2015) were the following. The Plainfield and Lebanon tonalites, both cutting 202 Ammonoosuc Volcanics, gave 475 ±5 Ma and 466 ±8 respectively. The Sugar River granodiorite including the M.S. Thesis of Jordan Makower (1964), and intruded the Ammonoosuc at 460 ±3 Ma at the same time as extrusion of a felsic lapilli tuff at 460 ±2 Omos Ma. Wendell Bears results from his Advanced Mapping Classes, 1980-1985. Oaau: Uppermost part of the mafic lower member. Hornblende amphibolite and former coarse Syncline anthophyllite amphibolite extensively retrograded to chlorite. Some of these rocks, especially near the Den top of the unit, contain significant magnetite, and these were followed through a series of folds across Dea Oamc Dated samples (Tucker and Robinson, 1990) the channel west of Little Quabbin Island, based on a ground-magnetic survey on the ice in February Faults 1965.
    [Show full text]
  • Record Hill Responses to Comments
    Appendix B – Comment Response Record Hill Responses to Comments DOE received 35 individual comment submissions totaling 167 individual comments. DOE reviewed each comment received on the Record Hill EA and has grouped the comments into the following comment categories as noted in Table 1. The individual commenters are identified in Table 2. Table 1 – Comment Response Matrix Section Topic Commenter Numbers Comments 1. NEPA Process 3, 15, 16, 18, 24, 26, 30 3a, 15a, 15m, 16b, 18e, 24a, 24m, 26a, 26l, 30f Purpose and 1, 2, 12, 14, 18, 25, 27, 28, 1a, 2a, 2c, 12a, 14c, 18b, 18d, 18l, 25a, 25i, 27a, 28b, 28c, 2. Need 29, 33 28d, 28f, 29a, 29b, 29c, 33h, 33i Proposed 1a, 3b, 16d, 18c, 18f, 18g, 18h,18i, 18m, 18n, 18o, 18q, 18r, 3. Action and 1, 3, 16, 18, 25, 29, 33 25b, 25c, 25h, 29d, 33h Alternatives Water 5, 15, 18, 20, 23, 24, 25, 5a, 15c, 15e, 15g, 18t, 18u, 18v, 20f, 23a, 24c, 24e, 24f, 4. Resources 26, 30, 32 25e, 25g, 26c, 26e, 26f, 30d, 30e, 32a 5. Noise 11, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 35 11a, 11b, 14a, 14d, 17c, 18w, 19a, 20g, 35a Historic, Archaeological, 6. 20, 22 20b, 22b and Cultural Resources Aesthetic and Visual 12b, 15i, 18k, 18s, 18x, 18z, 18ab, 18ac, 20d, 20e, 24h, 7. 12, 15, 18, 20, 24, 26, 33 Resources and 26h, 33e Topography 8. Shadow Flicker 14 14b, 14d Occupational 9. Health and 11, 14, 15, 21, 24, 26 11a, 11b, 14d, 15h, 21a, 24g, 26g, Public Safety 3c, 5a, 5b, 13a, 13b, 15b, 15c, 15d, 16c, 17a, 17b, 17d, 17e, Biological 3, 5, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 24, 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Upton Open Space and Recreation Plan
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MAY 2011 TOWN OF UPTON D OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN a f North t Prepared by: Upton Open Space Committee (A Subcommittee of the Upton Conservation Commission) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Town of Upton D OPEN SPACE rAND RECREATION PLAN a f t May 2011 Prepared by: The Upton Open Space Committee (A Subcommittee of the Upton Conservation Commission) Town of Upton Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan – May 2011 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DEDICATION The members of the Open Space Committee wish to dedicate this Plan to the memory of our late fellow member, Francis Walleston who graciously served on the Milford and Upton Conservation Commissions for many years. __________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Upton Open Space Committee Members Tom Dodd Scott Heim Rick Holmes Mike Penko Marcella Stasa Bill Taylor Assistance was provided by: Stephen Wallace (Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission) Peter Flinker and Hillary King (Dodson Associates) Dave Adams (Chair, Upton Recreation Commission) Chris Scott (Chair, Upton Conservation Commission) Ken Picard (as a Member of the Upton Planning Board) Upton Board of Selectmen. Trish Settles (Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission) __________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]