And Green Sandpiper <I>Tringa Ochropus</I> in Bulgaria

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And Green Sandpiper <I>Tringa Ochropus</I> in Bulgaria Internatwnal Wader Studies 10: 370-374 Wood SandpiperTringa glareola and Green Sandpiper Tringaochropus in Bulgaria D.N. Nankinov Nankinov,D.N. 1998.Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola and Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropus in Bulgaria.International Wader Studies 10: 370-374. Thecurrent and historical status of WoodSandpiper Tringa glareola and Green Sandpiper Tringa ochropusin Bulgariais reviewed.Both species occur during the breeding season, but although WoodSandpipers have bred in thepast, they do not do soat present.In contrastsome tens of pairs of GreenSandpiper breed annually. Until 1992,only nine Wood Sandpipers and two Green Sandpiperswith foreignrings had been recorded in Bulgariaand neighbouring countries. Four morelocally-ringed Wood Sandpipers and two moreGreen Sandpipers were recaptured at the Atanasovskoyelake ornithological station. Green Sandpipers migrating through Bulgaria originate fromthe Balticstates, whilst Wood Sandpipers move from Scandinavia as well asfrom central Europe.The main threats to thesesandpipers are currently from wetland degradation, especially asa consequenceof pollution. D.N. Nankinov,Institute of Zoology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Boul. Rouski, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria. HauKuuon,]•. H. t998.•1• Trlngaglareola u qepmamTr•nga ochropus n Boarapuu. International Wader Studies 10: 370-374. Introduction Distribution of both speciesduring WoodSandpiper Tringa glareola and Green the year SandpiperTringa ochropus have not previouslybeen Winter the objectsof detailedstudy in Bulgaria.In The WoodSandpiper only occasionallyoverwinters in Bulgarianornithological literature little is found Bulgaria. Indeed,in the lasttwo decadesit hasbeen aboutthe occurrenceof thesespecies in the country recordedonly twice. (Radakoff 1878;Alleon 1886;Khristovich 1890; Reiser 1894; Collections du Musee, Sofia 1907; GreenSandpiper is a commonspecies which winters Petrov& Zlatanov1955; Boyev 1962; Boyev et al. 1964; Prostov 1964; Robel et al. 1978; Roberts 1980; throughoutthe wholecountry, near ice-free waters. Birdsconcentrate mainly at the Upper Frakialowland Petrov 1981; Nankinov 1982, 1985, 1989;Nankinov (theMaritsa river, reservoirs, ponds, ricefields), at the et al. 1997). lakesand marshesof Prichernomoryenear the Black Sea,in the valleysof the Strumaand Mestarivers and Data analysesin thispaper were collectedin the near Sofia. Winter concentrationsrarely exceedten 1970sand 1980s,including both observations and birds,most frequently as singles. resultsof ringingat two ornithologicalstations: the Atanasovskoyelake in easternBulgaria and at Rupitein south-westernBulgaria. Spring migration In the first daysof MarchWood Sandpipers start to 37O Nankinov'Wood Sandpiper Tringa glareola and Green Sandpiper Trmga ochropus m Bulgaria appearin largernumbers in thevalleys of the Sandpiperare recorded every year from the end of Struma, Marista and other rivers of southern April up to Julyin differentparts of the country, Bulgariaas well asat coastalareas (Prostov 1964). particularlyin theriver valleys. It is thoughtthat In north-easternBulgaria spring migration is visible sometens of pairsbreed each year (Nankinov 1985; in Marchand April at a varietyof wetlands(Petrov Hagemeijer& Blair 1997). & Zlatanov1955). During spring migration Wood Sandpiperis commonin thewhole country, often Autumn migration with conceritrationsof over 100 birds (up to 200on 1 During autumnmigration the WoodSandpiper May 1975at Atanasovskoyelake). Suchlarge occursat fewersites than the Green Sandpiper but concentrations have been recorded on the lakes in largernumbers. At the lakesnear Burgas(e.g. at Atanasovskoye,Burgaskoye, Mandrenskoye, and at theAtanasovskoye lake) up to 700individuals were thefishery ponds near Sokolitsa and Trud countedon 13August 1983; concentrations of 200 settlements,Plovdiv region; smaller concentrations birdscan be foundin Septemberat the were observednear Sofia, Plovdiv, Yambol, Mandrenskoye,Burgaskoye, Pomorijskoye lakes Pomorje,and Shabla. andat thefishery ponds near Trud settlement. Postbreedingmigration starts after heavy rains in GreenSandpipers are less numerous than Wood July,and birds are common near pools in Sandpipers.They occur in smallgroups, in pairs,or Dobrudzha (Petrov & Zlatanov 1955). singly.However, up to 120individuals were observedon 28April 1990at theAtanasovskoye GreenSandpipers appear alone or in smallflocks Lake. Concentrations of less than 100 birds were whichrarely exceed some tens of birds. It hasbeen recordedon otherlakes in thevicinity of the Black seenoccasionally at the Frakialowland feeding Sea,at the fisheryponds and water reservoirs of the togetherwith LapwingsVanellus vanellus and UpperFrakia lowland, in theRose Valley and in the YellowWagtails Motacillafiava on damp agricultural surroundingsof Sofia. lands. Between4 Marchand 27 May 1990waders were censusedat 14 sitesof the country(Nankinov et al. Changesin abundanceduring 1997).During thisstudy 40,802 waders of 32 the year specieswere counted, and the proportion of Wood Changesin abundanceof the two speciesshow Sandpiperand Green Sandpiper in thisnumber was somedifferences. Wood Sandpiper is presentin 1.9%and 1.6% respectively. The proportion of these Bulgariafrom the beginning of Marchto the end of speciesat lakesof theBlack Sea area was less, at November,and migrationinfluxes can be easily 0.8%and 0.35%respectively among 6,881 waders of recognisedboth in springand afterbreeding. It 19 species. doesnot seemto breedin Bulgarianowadays. Peak springmigration takes place in April when23.3% of Breedingperiod thetotal records of the specieswere recorded. In Bothspecies occur in Bulgariaduring the breeding May migrationis lessapparent (14.2% of records), season.Although these are mostly non and over- andonly 2.6% and 5.3%of speciesrecords occurred summeringbirds, some data aboutthe breeding of respectivelyin Juneand July. The heaviest bothspecies in Bulgariaare also available. migrationof WoodSandpipers takes place in In the 19thcentury the southernlimit of the August(31.5% of the total records),when most breedingrange in WoodSandpiper was situated birds can be found at the Black Sea coast. The furthersouth than at present,and the speciesbred numberdecreases in September(16.8%) and in Bulgaria(Radakoff 1879; Alleon 1886). Near Sofia especiallyin October(1.5%) and November (0.2%). on 9 June1897 two WoodSandpiper eggs were GreenSandpiper occurs in Bulgariayear-round. collected(Collection du Musee,Sophia 1907). Some Numbersdo not vary betweenthe seasonsso authorsbeheve that it is stillpossible that Wood markedlyas in WoodSandpiper; with tensor Sandpipercurrently breed in Bulgaria,in Dobrudza hundredsof birdsbeing recorded each month. or somewherenearby (Petrov & Zlatanov1955), but Birds,observed in Januaryon winteringgrounds thisis thoughtunlikely (Hagemeijer & Blair1997). comprised5.7% of the totalnumber of records. Springmigration becomes noticeable in March GreenSandpiper was formerly considered to be a (17.3%of records),and reaches the peak in April very commonbreeding species in Bulgaria (26.4%).The proportion of GreenSandpipers (Radakoff1879; Khristovich 1890), although there stayingin June(3.4% of records)is almostsimilar to weresome doubts about the reliabilityof thesedata thatin WoodSandpiper. (Reiser1894). Thereis very little information, however,about the breeding of thisspecies in In autumnWood Sandpipers are less abundant than Bulgariaduring the 20thcentury. It was found in spring:a slightincrease in number,observed in incubatingin north-easternBulgaria in the Batovoy August(12.5%) in comparisonwith July(6.8%) and river valleyin 1951(Petrov & Zlatanov1955), and September(7.9%), indicates the time of the most tenyears later - on 25June 1961 - Boyev(1962) intensemigration. found a nestwith four eggsnear Mirovo, Starozagorskyregion. Nowadays pairs of Green 371 Internattonal Wader Studies 10: 370-374 Habitat preferences appearedlater in winter in northernBulgaria. WoodSandpipers with Germanrings were recorded WoodSandpipers occur at fisheryponds, the banks alsoin Fennoscandia,Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, of smalland largerivers, at lakes,marshes, scattered Moroccoand Upper Volta (Schlenke11974).Wood riparianwoodlands, and otherkinds of wetlands Sandpipersringed on migrationin CentralEurope includingcoastal lagoons. During migration they occur also at montane water bodies. fly mostlyto the south-west(Glutz von Blotzheimet al. 1977). GreenSandpipers prefer damp woodlandsand afforested areas near water bodies such as lakes, It is probablethat someindividuals do not always marshesand canals,river floodplains;sometimes followthe same migratory route. This is suggested they canalso be foundon the openmarshes and by a recoveryof WoodSandpiper which migrated in ponds. Khristovich(1890) wrote that "it was August1963 through France, although the commonalong the Maritsa,Struma, Topolnitsa, Iskr, followingautumn it wasfound in easternEurope. Tundzha,Vcha, Yeli-Dyerye, Slivnishka and other Moreover,spring and autumnmigration routes may rivers,in winter - mostlyat the riversand unfrozen water bodies". In the mountains it reaches altitudes alsodiffer. Thus,one individual caught in spring (24April) in Italy was flying in autumn(the same of 2,400 m (Flossner1972). year)to the winteringgrounds via north-eastern Bulgaria.It canbe supposed(Nankinov 1989) that Food birdswhich cross Bulgaria in autumnreturn to their Data on diet in Bulgariaare very scarce.Near breedinggrounds through western Europe or vice Burgastown Prostov(1964) recorded that the versa.Myhrberg
Recommended publications
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Sandpiper
    Maine 2015 Wildlife Action Plan Revision Report Date: January 13, 2016 Calidris maritima (Purple Sandpiper) Priority 1 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) Class: Aves (Birds) Order: Charadriiformes (Plovers, Sandpipers, And Allies) Family: Scolopacidae (Curlews, Dowitchers, Godwits, Knots, Phalaropes, Sandpipers, Snipe, Yellowlegs, And Woodcock) General comments: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering population, regional surveys suggest Maine may support over 1/3 of the Western Atlantic wintering population. USFWS Region 5 and Canadian Maritimes winter at least 90% of the Western Atlantic population. Species Conservation Range Maps for Purple Sandpiper: Town Map: Calidris maritima_Towns.pdf Subwatershed Map: Calidris maritima_HUC12.pdf SGCN Priority Ranking - Designation Criteria: Risk of Extirpation: NA State Special Concern or NMFS Species of Concern: NA Recent Significant Declines: Purple Sandpiper is currently undergoing steep population declines, which has already led to, or if unchecked is likely to lead to, local extinction and/or range contraction. Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data). Maine has high responsibility for wintering populat Regional Endemic: Calidris maritima's global geographic range is at least 90% contained within the area defined by USFWS Region 5, the Canadian Maritime Provinces, and southeastern Quebec (south of the St. Lawrence River). Notes: Recent surveys suggest population undergoing steep population decline within 10 years. IFW surveys conducted in 2014 suggest population declined by 49% since 2004 (IFW unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Green Sandpiper Uttering Call of Wood Sandpiper.—With Reference to J
    NOTES Gannets robbing gulls.—On 5th August 1957, I spent the day at sea in Dingle Bay, Co. Kerry, in the trawler "Ros Brin". As soon as trawling operations began, we were accompanied by a few Storm Petrels (Hydrobates pelagicus), Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis), Great Black-backed Gulls (Larus marinus), Lesser Black-backed Gulls (L. fuscus), and large numbers of Herring Gulls (L. argentatus). During the gutting periods, and especially when any small waste fish were thrown over-board, six to eight Gannets (Sula bassana), would join in the feast. Any fish that sank too deep for the gulls were immediately taken by the Gannets by the normal manner of diving, but on numerous occasions when a gull sitting on the surface had a fish it could not swallow quickly—i.e. small plaice, dabs and other flat fish—one or other of the Gannets would plunge in a shallow-angled frontal dive at the gull, entering the water about two yards away and snatching the fish from the gull's bill on breaking the surface. The fish was swallowed on the surface. This was repeated many times, and the Gannets also frequently fluttered along the water and snatched fish from the bills of other gulls which they passed. On several occasions, too, a Gannet was seen to lunge into the air after a retreating gull that was attempting to rise from the water with a fish; the Gannet "treading water" with wings half-open and neck fully extended upwards in its endeavour to snap the fish from the slowly rising and heavily gorged' gull.
    [Show full text]
  • Tringarefs V1.3.Pdf
    Introduction I have endeavoured to keep typos, errors, omissions etc in this list to a minimum, however when you find more I would be grateful if you could mail the details during 2016 & 2017 to: [email protected]. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and best employed in conjunction with other reference sources. Grateful thanks to Graham Clarke (http://grahamsphoto.blogspot.com/) and Tom Shevlin (www.wildlifesnaps.com) for the cover images. All images © the photographers. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds). 2016. IOC World Bird List. Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 6.1 accessed February 2016]). Version Version 1.3 (March 2016). Cover Main image: Spotted Redshank. Albufera, Mallorca. 13th April 2011. Picture by Graham Clarke. Vignette: Solitary Sandpiper. Central Bog, Cape Clear Island, Co. Cork, Ireland. 29th August 2008. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Species Page No. Greater Yellowlegs [Tringa melanoleuca] 14 Green Sandpiper [Tringa ochropus] 16 Greenshank [Tringa nebularia] 11 Grey-tailed Tattler [Tringa brevipes] 20 Lesser Yellowlegs [Tringa flavipes] 15 Marsh Sandpiper [Tringa stagnatilis] 10 Nordmann's Greenshank [Tringa guttifer] 13 Redshank [Tringa totanus] 7 Solitary Sandpiper [Tringa solitaria] 17 Spotted Redshank [Tringa erythropus] 5 Wandering Tattler [Tringa incana] 21 Willet [Tringa semipalmata] 22 Wood Sandpiper [Tringa glareola] 18 1 Relevant Publications Bahr, N. 2011. The Bird Species / Die Vogelarten: systematics of the bird species and subspecies of the world. Volume 1: Charadriiformes. Media Nutur, Minden. Balmer, D. et al 2013. Bird Atlas 2001-11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing and Sexing the Common Sandpiper Actitis Hypoleucos
    ageing & sexing series Wader Study 122(1): 54 –59. 10.18194/ws.00009 This series summarizing current knowledge on ageing and sexing waders is co-ordinated by Włodzimier Meissner (Avian Ecophysiology Unit, Department of Vertebrate Ecology & Zoology, University of Gdansk, ul. Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdansk, Poland, [email protected]). See Wader Study Group Bulletin vol. 113 p. 28 for the Introduction to the series. Part 11: Ageing and sexing the Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos Włodzimierz Meissner 1, Philip K. Holland 2 & Tomasz Cofta 3 1Avian Ecophysiology Unit, Department of Vertebrate Ecology & Zoology, University of Gdańsk, ul.Wita Stwosza 59, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland. [email protected] 232 Southlands, East Grinstead, RH19 4BZ, UK. [email protected] 3Hoene 5A/5, 80-041 Gdańsk, Poland. [email protected] Meissner, W., P.K. Holland & T. Coa. 2015. Ageing and sexing series 11: Ageing and sexing the Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos . Wader Study 122(1): 54 –59. Keywords: Common Sandpiper, Actitis hypoleucos , ageing, sexing, moult, plumages The Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos is treated as were validated using about 500 photographs available on monotypic through a breeding range that extends from the Internet and about 50 from WRG KULING ringing Ireland eastwards to Japan. Its main non-breeding area is sites in northern Poland. also vast, reaching from the Canary Islands to Australia with a few also in the British Isles, France, Spain, Portugal MOULT SCHEDULE and the Mediterranean (Cramp & Simmons 1983, del Juveniles and adults leave the breeding grounds as soon Hoyo et al. 1996, Glutz von Blotzheim et al.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Terek Sandpiper in California
    FIRST RECORD OF THE TEREK SANDPIPER IN CALIFORNIA ERIKA M. WILSON, 1400 S. BartonSt. #421, Arlington,Virginia 22204 BETTIE R. HARRIMAN, 5188 BittersweetLane, Oshkosh,Wisconsin 54901 On 28 August 1988, while birding at Carmel River State Beach, MontereyCounty, California(36032 ' N, 121057' W), we discoveredan adult Terek Sandpiper (Xenus cinereus). We watched this Eurasian vagrantbetween 1110 and 1135 PDT; we saw it again,along with local birders, between 1215 and 1240 as it foraged on the open beach. Wilson observedthe bird a third time on 5 September 1988 between 1000 and 1130; otherssaw it regularlyuntil 23 September1988. During our first observationa light overcastsky resultedin good viewingconditions, without glare or strongshadows. The weather was mild with a slightbreeze and some offshorefog. We found the Terek Sandpiperfeeding in the Carmel River'sshallow lagoon, separated from the Pacific Ocean by sand dunes. Its long, upturnedbill, quite out of keepingwith any smallwader with whichwe were familiar,immediately attracted our attention. We moved closer and tried unsuccessfullyto photographit. Shortlythereafter all the birdspresent took to the air. The sandpiperflew out over the dunesbut curvedback and landedout of sighton the open beach. We telephonedRobin Roberson,and half an hour later she, Brian Weed, Jan Scott, Bob Tinfie, and Ron Branson arrived,the lattertwo armedwith telephotolenses. We quicklyrelocated the TerekSandpiper on the beach,foraging at the surfline. The followingdescription is basedon our field notes,with color names takenfrom Smithe(197.5). Our bird was a medium-sizedsandpiper resemblinga winter-plumagedSpotted Sandpiper (Actitis rnacularia)but distinguishedby bright yellow-orangelegs and an upturnedbill (Figure1). The evenlycurved, dark horn bill, 1.5 timesthe lengthof the bird'shead, had a fleshyorange base.
    [Show full text]
  • Hatching Dates for Common Sandpiper <I>Actitis Hypoleucos</I
    Hatching dates for Common Sandpiper Actitis hypoleucos chicks - variation with place and time T.W. Dougall, P.K. Holland& D.W. Yalden Dougall,T.W., Holland,P.K. & Yalden, D.W. 1995. Hatchingdates for CommonSandpiper Actitishypoleucos chicks - variationwith place and time. WaderStudy Group Bull. 76: 53-55. CommonSandpiper chicks hatched in 1990-94between 24 May (year-day146) and 13 July (year-day196), butthe averagehatch-date was variablebetween years, up to 10 days earlier in 1990 than in 1991. There are indicationsthat on average CommonSandpipers hatch a few days earlierin the Borders,the more northerlysite, butthis may reflecta changein the age structureof the Peak Districtpopulation between the 1970sand the 1980s- 1990s,perhaps the indirectconsequence of the bad weatherof April 1981. Dougall,T. W., 29 LaudstonGardens, Edinburgh EH3 9HJ, UK. Holland,P. K., 2 Rennie Court,Brettargh Drive, LancasterLA 1 5BN, UK. Yalden,D. W., Schoolof BiologicalSciences, University, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. INTRODUCTION Yalden(1991a) in calculatingthe originalregression, and comingfrom the years 1977-1989 (mostlythe 1980s). CommonSandpipers Actitis hypoleucos have a short We also have, for comparison,the knownhatch dates for breedingseason, like mostwaders; arriving back from 49 nestsreported by Hollandet al. (1982), comingfrom West Africa in late April, most have laid eggs by mid-May, various sites in the Peak District in the 1970s. which hatch around mid-June. Chicksfledge by early July, and by mid-Julymost breedingterritories are Ringingactivities continue through the breedingseason at deserted(Holland et al. 1982). The timingof the breeding both sites, and chickscan be at any age from 0 to 19 days season seems constantfrom year to year, but there are old when caught (thoughyoung chicks are generally few data to quantifythis impression.It is difficultto locate easier to find).
    [Show full text]
  • Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
    UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Spoon-Billed Sandpiper (Eurynorhynchus Pygmeus)
    CMS Technical Report Series No. 23 International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper (Eurynorhynchus pygmeus) Authors: Christoph Zöckler (ArcCona Ecological Consulting), Evgeny E. Syroechkovskiy Jr.(Russian Bird Conservation Union & Russian Academy of Sciences) , Gillian Bunting (ArcCona Ecological Consulting) Published by BirdLife International and the Secretariat of the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) Citation: C. Zöckler, E.E. Syroechkovskiy, Jr. and G. Bunting. International Single Species Action Plan for the Conservation of the Spoon-billed Sandpiper (Eurynorhynchus pygmeus) 2010 BirdLife International Asia Division, Tokyo, Japan; CMS Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.52pages. Technical Report Series 23 © 2010 BirdLife International and CMS. This publication, except the cover photograph, may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational and other non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. BirdLife International and CMS would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purposes whatsoever without prior permission from the copyright holders. Disclaimer The contents of this volume do not necessary reflect the views of BirdLife International and CMS. The designations employed and the presentation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of BirdLife International or CMS concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area in its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Copies of this publication are available from the following websites BirdLife International: www.birdlife.org BirdLife International Asia Division: www.birdlife-asia.org/eng/about/index.html CMS Secretariat: www.cms.int BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland
    Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland ANDREW N. HOODLESS,1 Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK CHRISTOPHER J. HEWARD, Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK ABSTRACT Migration represents a critical time in the annual cycle of Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), with poten- tial consequences for individual fitness and survival. In October–December, Eurasian woodcock migrate from breeding grounds in northern Eurasia over thousands of kilometres to western Europe, returning in March–May. The species is widely hunted in Europe, with 2.3–3.5 million individuals shot per year; hence, an understanding of the timing of migra- tion and routes taken is an essential part of developing sustainable flyway management. Our aims were to determine the timing and migration routes of Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland, and to assess the degree of connec- tivity between breeding and wintering sites. We present data from 52 Eurasian woodcock fitted with satellite tags in late winter 2012–2016, which indicate that the timing of spring departure varied annually and was positively correlated with temperature, with a mean departure date of 26 March (± 1.4 days SE). Spring migration distances averaged 2,851 ± 165 km (SE), with individuals typically making 5 stopovers. The majority of our sample of tagged Eurasian woodcock migrated to breeding sites in northwestern Russia (54%), with smaller proportions breeding in Denmark, Scandinavia, and Finland (29%); Poland, Latvia, and Belarus (9.5%); and central Russia (7.5%). The accumulated migration routes of tagged individ- uals suggest a main flyway for Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland through Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, and then dividing to pass through the countries immediately north and south of the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • 202 Common Redshank Put Your Logo Here
    Javier Blasco-Zumeta & Gerd-Michael Heinze Sponsor is needed. Write your name here Put your logo here 202 Common Redshank Ruff Redshank. Spring. Adult (02-V) COMMON REDSHANK (Tringa totanus ) SEXING IDENTIFICATION Plumage of both sexes alike. 27-28 cm. In spring with brownish upperparts barred dark; white rump; white tail with dark bars; wings with a broad white band on the ed- AGEING ge; white underparts with dark streaks on head, This species is a scarce breeder in Aragon, so neck and breast; red bill with dark tip; orange- only 3 age classes can be recognized: red legs. In autumn with darker colours on up- 1st year autumn with fresh plumage; median perparts: grey tinge on breast. coverts spotted pale on edge; tertials brown with buff and dark marks; pointed tail feathers; breast slightly streaked; dull reddish base of bill; yellowish legs. 2nd year spring similar to adult ; this age can be recognized only in birds with some unmoul- ted median wing coverts and/or tertials; flight feathers moderately worn. Adult with median coverts with whitish edge and dark subterminal band; tertials grey brown with variable markings: either plain or with dark sepia bars, sometimes with extensive dark markings; rounded tail feathers; underparts with variable amount of dark barring and spot- ting; reddish legs and base of bill. Redshank . Pattern of wing, tail and bill. SIMILAR SPECIES Recalls a Spotted Redhsank in autumn , without a white patch on wings and has a longer bill; Redshank. Ruff has a narrower wing band and two whi- Ageing. te bands on sides of uppertail Pattern of bill: top adult; bot- Spotted tom 1st Redshank.
    [Show full text]