DOCSLIB.ORG

Millennium D Ev E Lopment G Oals Reports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Millennium D Ev E Lopment G Oals Reports Eval u a tion Off i c e Uni t ed Nations Devel o p m e n t Progra m m e ERA D I C ATE EXTREME POVERTY AND HUNGER ERAD I C ATE EXTREME POVERTY AND HUNGER ERAD ACH I E VE UNIVERSAL PRIMARY EDUCATION ACH I E VE UNIVERSAL PRIMARY EDUCATION ACH I E VE U PRO M O TE GENDER EQUAL I T Y AND EMPOWER WOMEN PROM O TE GENDER EQUAL I T Y AND EMPO REDUCE CHILD MORTAL I T Y REDUCE CHILD MORTAL I T Y REDUCE CHILD MORTAL I T Y REDUCE CHIL IM P R OVE MATERNAL HEALTH IMPROVE MATERNAL HEALTH IMPROVE MATERNAL HEALTH IMPROV COM B AT HIV/AIDS,MA L ARIA AND OTHER DISEASES COM B AT HIV/AIDS, MA L ARIA AND OTHER DIS ENSURE ENVIRON M E N T AL STAB I L I T Y ENSURE ENVIRON M E N T AL STAB I L I T Y ENSURE ENVIRON M E N T DEV E L OP A GLOB AL PAR TNERSHIP FOR DEVE L OPMENT DEVE L OP A GLOB AL PAR TNERSHIP FOR DE MILLENNIUM DEV E L OPMENT GO ALS REPORTS: AN ASSESSMENT VO LUME I: MAIN REPORT Evaluation Team Team Leader: A. K. Shiva Kumar Team Members: Mário Alberto Adauta de Sousa David Clapp Francis Hansford Kalyani Menon-Sen Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh National Consultants: Albania Anesti Kashta Bolivia Flavio Escobar Cambodia Beng Hong Socheat Khemro Lesotho Dikokole Mathembiso Maqutu Mongolia Namraisdorj Batchimeg Poland Wociechtek Marchlewski Senegal Diossy Santos Yemen Taha Al-Fusail UNDP Evaluation Office Task Manager: Fadzai Gwaradzimba Evaluation Advisor 1 MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS REPORTS: AN ASSESSMENT Contents Foreword Acronyms Executive Summary iv-vii 1. Background 1 1.1 Purpose of the Assessment 1.2 Approach and Methodology 2. Main findings 5 2.1 Key findings from the Country Studies 2.2 Value addition of the MDG Reports 2.3 Content and quality of the MDG Reports 2.4 Ownership 2.5 Capacity issues 2.6 Advocacy and dissemination 2.7 Linkages and alignment of MDG Reports with national development frameworks and reporting instruments 2.8 Conclusions 3. Implications and Recommendations 23 Annexes: I. List of MDG Goals, Targets and Indicators II. Terms of Reference for the Evaluation III. Countries that have produced MDG Reports: 2001 to April 2003 IV. List of persons met and consulted V. MDG Reports: A look through a gender lens – Executive Summary VI. Statistical capacities of a sample of countries producing MDG Reports 2 Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank BDP Bureau for Development Policy BoS Bureau of Statistics, Lesotho BWI Bretton Woods Institutions CCA Common Country Assessment CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CO Country Offices CRC Convention on the Rights of the Child CSD Council for Social Development, Cambodia CSO Civil Society Organisations DPMP Department of Population and Manpower Development, Lesotho EO Evaluation Office EU European Union GSCSD General Secretariat - Council for Social Development, Cambodia HDR Human Development Report HDRO Human Development Report Office HIPC Highly Indebted Poor Countries ICPD International Conference on Population and Development IFI International Financial Institution IMF International Monetary Fund INE National Institute of Statistics, Bolivia MD Millennium Declaration MDGs Millennium Development Goals MDGRs Millennium Development Goal Reports NGO Non-governmental Organisation NHDR National Human Development Report ODA Overseas Development Assistance OSG Operations Support Group PMATU Poverty Monitoring and Analysis Technical Unit, Cambodia PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper RBAP Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific RBEC Regional Bureau for Europe and Countries in Transition RBLAC Regional Bureau for Latin America RBx Regional Bureaux RC Resident Coordinator RR Resident Representative SADC Southern Africa Development Committee UDAPE Unit for Analysis of Social and Economic Policies, Bolivia UN United Nations UNCT United Nations Country Team UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDG United Nations Development Group UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNDP EO UNDP Evaluation Office UNESCAP United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific UNFPA United Nations Fund for Population Activities UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNRC United Nations Resident Coordinator UNSG United Nations Secretary General UNTG United Nations Theme Group WB World Bank 3 WHO World Health Organisation 4 Foreword The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are central to the mission of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and indeed the United Nations (UN) system as a whole. The MDG Reports, which track progress towards the Goals have the potential to become the centre piece of effective public campaigns to build momentum to achieve the MDGs. This evaluation report presents the findings of a forward-looking assessment of the Millennium Development Goals Reports that was conducted by the UNDP Evaluation Office between February and May 2003. The assessment originated with the request of UNDP central units and the Regional Bureaux who were concerned about improving the quality and use of the MDGRs. The evaluation has assessed the value addition of the MDGRs and their content and quality, issues of ownership and capacity, and the alignment and linkage with other country level reporting processes. The evaluation raises pertinent issues and concerns for improving reporting at the country level. The findings and lessons of this evaluation are important contributions to the ongoing debates on how the UN and development partners’ efforts towards the attainment of MDGs can be substantially strengthened. Significantly, the report underlines the need for better convergence and stronger links between the monitoring and reporting processes of MDGs, Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs), other national comprehensive development frameworks and reporting instruments such as the National Human Development Report (NHDR), Common Country Assessment (CCA) and the United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF). UNDP Country Offices (COs) in particular will need to focus on better coordination and harmonisation of UN wide efforts in support of MDGs and PRSPs and their alignment with national development frameworks. A number of people have contributed to the success of this evaluation. We are grateful to the evaluation team which comprised the core team: Shiva Kumar (Bolivia and Mongolia) team leader, David Clapp (Albania & Poland ), Mario Alberto Adauta de Sousa (Lesotho), Francis Hansford (Bolivia), Kalyani Menon-Sen (Mongolia) and Shrarbanou Tadjibakhsh (Senegal). This core group teamed up with eight national consultants for the eight case studies as indicated in brackets: Anesti Kashta (Albania), Flavio Escobar (Bolivia), Beng Hong Socheat Khemro (Cambodia), Dikokole Mathembiso Maqutu (Lesotho), Namaraisdorj Batchimeg (Mongolia), Wociechtek Marchlewski (Poland), Diossy Santos (Senegal) and Taha Al-Fusail (Yemen). We owe a debt of gratitude to the governments of the eight countries studied , the United Nations County Teams (UNCTs), donor partners and national stakeolders for their valuable insights. I would also like to extend special thanks to all the UNDP Resident Representatives and the MDG focal points in the eight countries which were studied and the 24 country offices which provided inputs to the questionnares. Their cooperation and facilitation of the studies was invaluable. Colleagues in all the UNDP Regional Bureaux and central units provided valuable feedback thoughout the process. In the EO, special thanks are due to Fadzai Gwaradzimba, Evaluation Advisor and task manager, who guided and managed the entire exercise including the finalisation of this report; Anish Pradhan, Hajera Abdullahi, Elvira Larrain and Flora Jimenez, for providing technical, administrative and logistical support throughout. Saraswathi Menon Director UNDP Evaluation Office 5 Executive Summary CONTEXT In September 2000, the member states of the United Nations (UN) adopted the Millennium Declaration, which set out, among other things, a series of clear commitments, goals and targets for the achievement of human development. These goals were subsequently transformed into the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs, which include a call to halve the proportion of people living under extreme poverty, halt and reverse the spread of HIV/AIDS and achieve universal primary education for both boys and girls by the year 2015, reflect growing international consensus on what constitutes human development1 (http://www.undp.org/mdg/). In this respect, the MDGs are very much at the core of United Nations Development Programmes’s (UNDP) mission and that of the entire UN system. A number of initiatives have been set in motion to generate sustained commitment and support country level efforts, and among these are the MDG Reports (MDGRs). MDG reporting is important to the UNDP because the United Nations Secretary General (UNSG) has assigned the Administrator, in his capacity as chair of the United Nations Development Group (UNDG), with the role of coordinating the UN system’s work on the MDGs. The initiative for reporting on the MDGs started in 2001 with Cambodia, Chad, Tanzania and Vietnam producing the first MDGRs. By April 2003, 23 countries had produced MDGRs. Of these, seven were produced in 2001, 16 in 2002 and by April 2003, another three had been released. Two countries, Cameroon and Vietnam, have already produced two MDGRs in the course of 2001 and 2002. At present another 50 countries are in the process of preparing MDGRs due for release by the end of 2003.2 This report presents the findings of the rapid assessment of the MDGRs that was conducted by the Evaluation Office (EO) of the UNDP between February and May 2003. The assessment was undertaken at the request of UNDP central units and Regional Bureaux (RBx) to examine the reporting processes in place and assess the quality, relevance and the value added of the MDGRs in order to assist UNDP and the United Nations Country Teams (UNCTs) to improve reporting on the progress being made towards the attainment of MDGs. It focuses on the following aspects of the MDGRs: (a) value added; (b) content and quality of the MDGRs; (c) country ownership; (d) capacity; (e) advocacy and dissemination; and (f) alignment and linkages with other country level reporting processes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards a Human Security Approach to Peacebuilding 1
    www.isp.unu.edu Number 2, 2010 Overview In recent decades, international Towards a Human Security peacebuilding and reconstruction after civil wars have managed to promote stability and contain conflict in many Approach to Peacebuilding regions around the world, ending violence and enabling communities to rebuild their lives and societies. HAT IS THE RECORD, EFFECTIVENESS AND LEGACY However, the peacebuilding record of liberal approaches to peacebuilding in conflict-prone and post-conflict indicates that there are problems W societies? Aside from promoting stability and containing conflict, why does related to the effectiveness and international peacebuilding have a mixed—or even poor—record in promoting legitimacy of peacebuilding, especially welfare, equitable human development and inclusive democratic politics? Have these related to the promotion of liberal shortcomings jeopardized overall peacebuilding objectives and contributed to democracy, market reform and state questions about its legitimacy? How might alternative approaches to peacebuilding, institutions. This brief considers these based upon welfare and public service delivery, promote a more sustainable and limitations and argues that a new human security-based approach may inclusive form of peace? These questions allude to a core concern regarding offer insights for a more sustainable international peacebuilding: the limitations of existing approaches and the need form of peacebuilding. for greater emphasis upon welfare economics, human development and local engagement. Peacebuilding
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Eastern Women on the Move Middle Eastern Women on the Move
    Middle East Project MIDDLE EASTERN WOMEN ON THE MOVE MIDDLE EASTERN WOMEN ON THE MOVE Middle East Project MIDDLE EASTERN WOMEN ON THE MOVE Openings for and the Constraints on Women’s Political Participation in the Middle East ©2003 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. www.wilsoncenter.org WOODROW WILSON INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR SCHOLARS LEE H. HAMILTON, DIRECTOR BOARD OF TRUSTEES Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chair; David A. Metzner, Vice Chair. Public Members: James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress; John W. Carlin, Archivist of the United States; Bruce Cole, Chair, National Endowment for the Humanities; Roderick R. Paige, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education; Colin L. Powell, Secretary, U.S. Department of State; Lawrence M. Small, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution; Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Private Citizen Members: Joseph A. Cari, Jr., Carol Cartwright, Donald E. Garcia, Bruce S. Gelb, Daniel L. Lamaute, Tamala L. Longaberger, Thomas R. Reedy WILSON COUNCIL Bruce S. Gelb, President. Diane Aboulafia-D'Jaen, Elias F. Aburdene, Charles S. Ackerman, B.B. Andersen, Cyrus A. Ansary, Lawrence E. Bathgate II, John Beinecke, Joseph C. Bell, Steven Alan Bennett, Rudy Boschwitz, A. Oakley Brooks, Melva Bucksbaum, Charles W. Burson, Conrad Cafritz, Nicola L. Caiola, Raoul L. Carroll, Scott Carter, Albert V. Casey, Mark Chandler, Peter B. Clark, Melvin Cohen, William T. Coleman, Jr., Michael D. DiGiacomo, Sheldon Drobny, F. Samuel Eberts III, J. David Eller, Mark Epstein, Melvyn J. Estrin, Sim Farar, Susan Farber, Joseph H. Flom, John H. Foster, Charles Fox, Barbara Hackman Franklin, Norman Freidkin, Morton Funger, Gregory M.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security Twenty Years On
    Expert Analysis June 2014 Human security twenty years on By Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh Executive summary The concept of human security, which made its international debut in the 1994 UNDP Human Development Report, adds a people-centred dimension to the traditional security, development and human rights frameworks while locating itself in the area where they converge. Ever since, a number of countries have used the concept for their foreign and aid policies. Although it became the subject of a 2012 General Assembly Resolution, the concept still courts controversy and rejection twenty years after its introduction. Politically, its close association with the notion of the Responsibility to Protect in debates about international interventions has alienated Southern countries that are sceptical about violations of state sovereignty and new conditionali- ties for receiving aid. No country has adopted it as a goal at the national level, raising scepticism about its utility for domestic policymaking. Yet the concept represents a malleable tool for ana- lysing the root causes of threats and their multidimensional consequences for different types of insecurities. It can be operationalised through applying specific principles to policymaking and can be used as an evaluative tool for gauging the impact of interventions on the dynamics of other fields. The article suggests that Norway not only pursues the goal of human security at the global level, but that it also leads in adopting it as a national goal by scrutinising the country’s domestic policies using this approach. Still shaky after twenty years1 – have negated its value as an analytical framework, Often, in the space where the policy, political and academic rejected its utility as a policy agenda, and even opposed its arenas converge, much ink is spilled in defence of a very very existence as a concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security Handbook
    HUMAN SECURITY HANDBOOK An integrated approach for the realization of the Sustainable Development Goals and the priority areas of the international community and the United Nations system Human Security Unit · United Nations · January 2016 1 CONTENTS Acronyms . 3 Introduction . 4 The Human Security Approach and Its Added Value . 5 Towards a Stronger Response by the United Nations System . 11 Application of the Human Security Approach to Programmes and National Plans . 17 Annex 1 - Designing a Human Security Programme: A Case Study from Kenya . 30 Annex 2 - Examples of Programmes Funded by the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security . 40 2 ACRONYMS FAO Food and Agriculture Organization ILO International Labour Organization MDGs Millennium Development Goals NGO Non-governmental organization SDGs Sustainable Development Goals UNESCO United Nations Economic, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNFPA United Nations Population Fund UN Habitat United Nations Human Settlements Programme UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNIDO United Industrial Development Organization UNTFHS United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security UNV United Nations Volunteers UN Women United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women WHO World Health Organization 3 INTRODUCTION Prepared as a guide for practitioners and policymakers who plan to integrate the human security approach into their work, this handbook provides an overview of the principles that embody the approach and its added value. It introduces a step-by-step analytical process for the design and im- plementation of human security initiatives, and provides guidance for assessing the added value of the approach.
    [Show full text]
  • India's and Pakistan's Strategies in Afghanistan : Implications for the United States and the Region / Larry Hanauer, Peter Chalk
    CENTER FOR ASIA PACIFIC POLICY International Programs at RAND CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation occasional paper series. RAND occa- sional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, a conference summary, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor: Shahrbanou TADJBAKHSH Session: July 2021 Language of Instruction: English Number of Hours of Class: 36
    Professor: Shahrbanou TADJBAKHSH Session: July 2021 Language of instruction: English Number of hours of class: 36 Objective of the Course The course on Human Security introduces students to a broader conception of “security,” one which concerns itself not just with the stability of the state, but also with risks to people in their everyday lives. The course looks at the intersection between the academic fields and policy practices of development, security studies and human rights. Students will learn how to define, critique and measure human security both subjectively and objectively. They will also learn how to design policies and programs aimed at responding to and preventing multi-dimensional threats to people’s security. They will use the human security framework to evaluate various policies and practices through case studies. Summary While hundreds of thousands of people died from COVID-19 worldwide and a number of heads of states declared ‘war’ and a state of public health emergency, there had not been any attacks by an enemy state using armed forces against any nation. Traditional security thinking and the tools of national security, i.e. relying on military force, had not proven adequate to protect the lives and well-being of citizens threatened by a virus. The Coronavirus Pandemic was also not just a health emergency: it had devastating impacts on economic, food, personal, environmental and political security of states and people everywhere in different ways and different degrees. The pandemic showed how threats are linked in a domino effect across nations and across sectors. A shock in one area can ripple in other areas, snowballing into a multidimensional crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Strategy in Central Asia
    Implementing the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in Central Asia 2nd Expert Meeting Addressing Pillar II of the Strategy co-organized by the CTITF, UNRCCA and the EU co-financed by the Government of Norway With the support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Tajikistan March 29-30th, 2011, Dushanbe, Tajikistan FINAL REPORT 1 The Second Expert Meeting of the CTITF and EU (EEAS) project on the implementation of the UN Global Counter-terrorism Strategy in Central Asia took place in Dushanbe on 29-30 March 2011. The meeting was co-organized by the CTITF, EU (EEAS) and UNRCCA with the support of the host government of Tajikistan and financial support from the EU (EEAS) and the Government of Norway. The goal of the second of three Expert Meetings was to provide a platform for sharing experiences, to explore mutual cooperation among Central Asian countries, to identify best practices and gaps in their efforts towards countering terrorism, and to gather concrete recommendations on Pillar II of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy for the Joint Action Plan for the Implementation of the Strategy in Central Asia. It brought together 61 representatives of: Ø Governments of four Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan) represented through four representatives of their Ministries of Foreign Affairs, National Security Committees, Prosecutor General’s Offices and Ministries of Interior; Ø Representatives of states of the region and other countries (Afghanistan, China, Germany, Iran, Norway, Pakistan, Russian Federation and the US); Ø Representatives of regional and international organizations (CICA, CIS, CSTO, INTERPOL, NATO, OSCE, RATS SCO and SCO); Ø Representatives of EU (EU and EEAS and EU CTC); Ø Representatives of UN organizations and CTITF entities (OHCHR, CTED, DPA, UNDP, UNHCR, UNICRI, UNODC, UNRCCA, UN SC 1267 Sanction Committee on Al-Qaeda and the Taliban and UN SC 1540 Committee expert).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Regionalism in Tajikistan
    TITLE : ECONOMIC REGIONALISM IN TAJIKISTAN AUTHOR: SHAHRBANOU TADJBAKHSH, Colombia University THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEA N RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION : ' CONTRACTOR : Columbia Universit y PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Shahrbanou Tadjbakhs h COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 809-08 DATE : January 25, 199 6 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U .S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials fo r their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law . The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made ayailable by the U. S. Department of State under Titl e VIII (the Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended). The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author(s) . Executive Summar y Despite the introduction of the national currency, known as the Tajik Rubl in May 1995 , economic relations between different regions of Tajikistan is increasingly falling apart .
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF 157KB
    Select Committee on International Relations and Defence Corrected oral evidence: The UK and Afghanistan Wednesday 28 October 2020 11 am Watch the meeting Members present: Baroness Anelay of St Johns (The Chair); Lord Alton of Liverpool; Baroness Blackstone; Baroness Fall; Lord Grocott; Lord Hannay of Chiswick; Lord Mendelsohn; Lord Purvis of Tweed; Baroness Rawlings; Lord Reid of Cardowan; Baroness Smith of Newnham. Evidence Session No. 12 Virtual Proceeding Questions 100 - 107 Witnesses I: Dr Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, Adjunct Associate Professor, Security Studies Program, Georgetown University, and Professor, Institute for Political Studies, (Sciences Po Paris); Dr Avinash Paliwal, Associate Professor and Deputy Director, South Asia Institute, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is a corrected transcript of evidence taken in public and webcast on www.parliamentlive.tv. 1 Examination of witnesses Dr Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh and Dr Avinash Paliwal. Q100 The Chair: Good morning and welcome to the second evidence-taking session today in our inquiry, The UK and Afghanistan. Our witnesses are Dr Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, Adjunct Associate Professor at the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University, and Professor at the Institute for Political Studies (Sciences Po Paris), and Dr Avinash Paliwal, Associate Professor and Deputy Director of the South Asia Institute, School of Oriental and African Studies. Welcome to you and thank you very much indeed for agreeing to give your expert evidence to us in our inquiry. I advise Members and witnesses that the session is broadcast. It is on the record and it will be transcribed. I again remind members of the Committee that when they put questions to our witnesses, if they have a relevant interest to declare they should do so as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Shahrbanou TADJBAKHSH Interdependency Trends in a Multi-Polar World .............................. 3 Martha OLCOTT Regional Cooperation in Central Asia: Improving the Western Track Record ......................................................................................................... 21 Miroslav JENČA Developments in Central Asia and the role of the UNRCCA .... 30 Elnara BAINAZAROVA Central Asia Faces New Security Challenge: Illegal Migration Flows ......................................................................................................................... 41 Sayfiddin JURAEV The Uzbekistan’s Role in Central Asia ................................................... 55 Radoslav JUSKO Coalitions of Countries in the GATT/WTO Negotiations ........... 70 REVIEW The Geopolitics of Emotion: How cultures of Fear, Humiliation, and Hope are Reshaping the World By Dominique Moïsi. New York et al: Doubleday, 2009. Michal ONDERČO .................................................................................................. 92 3 Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh Interdependency Trends in a Multi-Polar World Summary: The article discusses the issues of unitary and multiple polarities in relation to state inter-dependency in the Central Asian region. The author makes the case that regionalism among nation states will be the determining factor in implementing long term policies for human security and cooperation. The article proposes that regional associations, such as the UNRCCA, can act as a structural arbitrator setting
    [Show full text]
  • Pve Ct Mapping 4-1 1.Pdf
    Towards a comprehensive implementation of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in Central Asia Mapping of PVE and CT Initiatives in Central Asia Draft in progress, periodically updated1 13 April 2018 As part of the activities for Phase III of the Project on “Towards a comprehensive implementation of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in Central Asia” the UN Office for Counter-Terrorism-UN Counter-Terrorism Center (UNOCT-UNCCT) and the UN Regional Center for Preventive Diplomacy in Central Asia (UNRCCA) have envisaged a series of coordination meetings bringing together UN agencies and regional and international organizations working on issues related to preventing violent extremism (PVE) and counter-terrorism (CT) in Central Asia. At the first meeting held on February 23, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey, a decision was made to map out the activities of organizations and share them in order to have a better picture of what is being done and by whom. Such a mapping, compiled based on information received as of March 2018, is a living document that will be updated periodically. It is expected to be a useful tool for coordination, information sharing, identification of gaps and potential identification of synergies and cooperation between organizations. Ultimately it will be useful for governments of the region, donors and agencies. The mapping charts out activities of UN agencies and other regional and international organizations operating in Central Asia. related to measures identified from the Joint Plan of Action for the Implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in Central Asia (JPoA) or from the UN Secretary General’s Plan of Action to Prevent Violent Extremism (PVE) (A/70/674).
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security Framework and National Human Development Reports
    United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office National Human Development Report Series NHDR Occasional Paper 5 The Human Security Framework and National Human Development Reports 5 By Richard Jolly and Deepayan Basu Ray © United Nations Development Programme This paper is an independent publication commissioned by the United Nations Development Programme. It does not necessarily reflect the views of UNDP, its Executive Board or UN Member States. The Human Security Framework and National Human Development Reports: A Review of Experiences and Current Debates By Richard Jolly and Deepayan Basu Ray (Institute of Development Studies, Sussex) United Nations Development Programme National Human Development Report Unit May 2006 Foreword It is with great pleasure that the National Human Development Report (NHDR) Unit of the Human Development Report Office presents this NHDR Occasional Paper on Human Security. This study is part of a series that came about in response to the suggestion of national human development report teams from around the world who were seeking to apply a human development vision to policy-making in various sectors or themes, but found a paucity of concrete written guidance to sup- port them in this task. The purpose of the series is to provide theoretical background and practical support for development practitioners to address certain themes within a human development conceptual framework. Studies do not offer ‘blueprints’ or prescrip- tive recipes, as the work of making the human development approach operational in a local context must be rooted in the development challenges faced there. The following paper draws upon a thorough review of a number of NHDRs address- ing human security as well as cutting-edge literature in this field.
    [Show full text]