Scomber Japonicus Houttuyn, 1782

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scomber Japonicus Houttuyn, 1782 ISSN 0014-5602 FtRS(S 157 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No 157 SAST- Scomberjaponicus 1,75(O1OO1,O1 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE CHU3 MACKEREL (Scomberjaponicus Houttuyn, 1782) * Food and A Agriculture Organization i'o of the / x+ United .qr Nations ÊAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 157 FIR/Si 57 SAST - Scomberjaponicus 1,75(01)001 01 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE CHUB MACKEREL (Scomberjaponicus Houttuyn, 1782) Prepared by José J. Castro Hernández and Ana T. Santana Ortega Departamento de Biología Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Apdo. 550, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2000 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN 92-5-1 04404-X All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechani- cal, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 2000 FIR/S 157Scomber/aponicus iii PREPARATION OF THIS SYNOPSIS The chub mackerel Scomberjaponicus is a very important species in commercial andartisanal fisheries throughout the world. Although it is heavily fished and detailed fishery information is available,this is the first time biological data and fishery information is brought together by the authors ina single edition. As quantita- tive and qualitative information of various aspects of the biology, ecology, stocks and utilization of thechub mackerel is widely scattered in the literature, this synopsis was undertaken to fill the need forcomprised and de- tailed information on this important scombrid to help to improve the knowledge about this species and to maintain it as an important food resource for human consumption. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank Professor Carlos Bas for the scientific support that he gave us during his stance in the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Thanks are also given to Dr Beatriz Morales-Nm, Consejo Su- perior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Mallorca, Dr Enric Massutí, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Mallorca and Dr Pere Oliver of FAO, Rome, Italy for their valuable suggestions. We would like to emphasize the important collaboration and comments of the staff of the FAO Fisheries Department during the edition of this synopsis. Project Manager: P. Oliver (FAO, Rome). Technical Editors: R. Bonfil (University of British Columbia, Canada), J. Minow (FAO, Rome). Illustrators:P. Lastrico, E. D'Antoni (FAO, Rome) and J. Varela. Page Composition: M. Kautenberger (FAO, Rome). Maps: F. Carocci (FAO, Rome). Contact Address: Tel: 34 928454549; Fax: 34 928452922; E-mail: [email protected] Castro Hernández, J.J.; Santana Ortega, A.T. Synopsis of biological data on the chub mackerel (Scomberjaponicus Houttuyn, 1782). FAO Fisheries Synorsis. No. 157. Rome, FAO. 2000. 77p. ABSTRACT Chub mackerel (Scomberjaponicus) is a pelagic species that inhabits warm and temperate coastal waters of the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans. Chub mackerel undertakes consider- able seasonal migrations between feeding and spawning areas. This species reaches its fastest growth in length (between 35.4 and 62.6% of the maximum length of the species in each area) during the first year of life. The maximum reported age is 18 years. Spawning is normally limited to the first half of the year in the northern hemisphere, and to the second half in the south- ern hemisphere, but spawning takes place all year round around the equator. Chub mackerel feed on zooplankton, although cephalopods and small pelagic fishes, especially anchovies and sardines, are also frequent in the diet. There is also evidence of cannibalism in this spe- cies. Chub mackerel are frequently preyed bytunas, marlins, sailfish, dolphin-fish, sharks, sea lions and sea birds. This species is of great importance for fisheries worldwide. In 1978, the chub mackerel ranked third in importance in catches by species (3.4 million tons), while in 1979 and 1980 it ranked fourth and fifth, with 2.8 and 2.6 million tons, respectively. In 1966 this spe- cies ranked fifth with a worldwide catch of 2.1 million tons. lt is mainly caughtwith purse seines, sometimes using light, and also by trolling, lines, gilinets, traps, beach seines and midwater trawls. Distribution: Authors FAO Fisheries Officers Regional Fisheries Councils and Commissions Selector SC FIR/S 157Scomberjaponicus y TABLE OF CONTENTS Page IDENTITY ... i 1.1 Nomenclature i 1.1.1Valid name i 1.1.2 FAO code 1 1.1.3 Synonyms 1 1.2 Taxonomy 1 1.2.1Affinities 1 1.2.1.1 Suprageneric 1 1.2.1.2 Generic 2 1.2.1.3 Specific 2 1 .2.2Taxonomical status 3 1.2.3 Subspecies 3 1.2.3.1 Standard common names, vernacular names 3 1 .3Morphology 4 1.3.1External morphology 5 1.3.2Internal morphology 6 1 .3.3Cytomorphology 6 1 .3.4Protein specificity 8 DISTRIBUTION 8 2.1Total area 8 2.2Determinant of distribution changes 9 2.3Hybridization 9 BIONOMIC AND LIFE HISTORY 9 3.1Reproduction 9 3.1.1Sexuality 9 3.1.2Maturity 9 3.1.3Mating 10 3.1.4Fertilization 10 3.1.5 Gonads 10 3.1.5.1Description of maturity stages 10 3.1.5.2 Fecundity and egg size 11 3.1.6 Spawning 12 3.1.6.1 Spawning season and location 12 3.1.6.2 Induction of spawning 15 3.2Preadult phase 15 3.2.1Embryonic phase 15 3.2.2Larvalphase 15 3.2.3Adolescent phase 17 3.3Adult phase 17 3.3.1Longevity 17 3.3.2Hardiness 17 3.3.3Competitors 17 3.3.4Predators 18 3.3.5Parasites, diseases, injuries, and abnormalities 18 vi FIR/S 157Scomberjaponicus Page 3.4Nutrition and growth 20 3.4.1Feeding 20 3.4.1.1 Food intake 20 3.4.1.2 Intestinal rnicroflora 20 3.4.2Food 20 3.4.2.1 Diet of larvae 20 3.4.2.2 Diet of juveniles 20 3.4.2.3 Diet of adults 21 3.4.3 Growth rate 26 3.4.4 Metabolism 29 3.5Behaviour 30 3.5.1Migrations and local movements 30 3.5.2Schooling 32 3.5.3 Swimming behaviour 33 3.5.4 Responses to stimuli 33 3.5.5 Temperature range 34 POPULATION 34 4.1 Structure 34 4.1.1Sex ratio 34 4.1.2 Age composition 34 4.1.3Size composition 35 4.2 Abundance and density 36 4.2.1Average abundance 36 4.2.2 Changes in abundance 36 4.3Natality and recruitment 37 4.3.1Reproduction rates 37 4.3.2Recruitment 37 4.4Mortality and morbidity 38 4.4.1Mortality rates 38 4.4.2Factors causing or affecting mortality 39 4.5Dynamics of the population 39 EXPLOITATION 40 5.1 Fishing equipment 40 5.1.1Gears 40 5.1.2Boats 41 5.2Fishing areas 42 5.2.1Geographic range 42 5.2.2Depth ranges 43 5.3Fishing seasons 43 5.4Fishing operation and results 43 5.5Climatic influences 51 PROTECTION AND MANAGEMENT 52 CULTURE 53 REFERENCES FIR/S 157Scomber/aponicus 1 1. IDENTITY S.diegoAyres, 1857 1.1 Nomenclature Pneumatophorus diego(Ayres, 1858) 1.1.1Valid name S.janesaba:Günther, 1860 The scientific name for the chub mackerel is P.japonicusStarks, 1922 Scomberjaponicus(Houttuyn, 1782) (Fig. 1). P.coliasStarks, 1922 1.1.2 FAO Code P. grex Jordan & Hubbs, 1925 1.75(01)001.01 P. diego Jordan & Hubbs, 1925 1.1.3 Synonyms P. peruanus Jordan & Hubbs, 1925 ScomberjaponicusjaponicusHouttuyn, 1782 S.japonicusperuanusJordan & Hubbs, 1925 PneumatophorusjaponicusjaponicusHo uttuyn, 1782 S.gigasFowler, 1935 S.japonicus:Bonnaterre, 1788 P.japonicus marplatensisLópez, 1955 S.coliasGmelin, 1789 S.japonicus eoliasPadoa, 1956 S.japonicus eolias(Gmelin, 1789) S.japonicus marplatensis(Sánchez, 1959) S.pneumatophorusDelaroche, 1809 P.peruanus:Kramer, 1960 S.eolias:Rafinesque, 1810 S.peruanusFitch & Craig, 1964 S.macrophthalmusRafinesque, 1810 S. diego: Fitch & Craig, 1964 S.grexMitchill, 1815 S.(Pneumatophorus)japonicus:LIons, 1986. S.grex:Cuvier, 1 829 S.pneumathophorus:Cuvier, 1829 S.capensisCuvier, 1831 1.2Taxonomy S.maculatusCouch, 1832 1.2.1Affinities S.undulatusSwainson, 1839 1.2.1.1 Suprageneric S.gracilisSwainson, 1839 Kingdom: Animalia S.macrophthalmus:Bonaparte, 1845 Phylum: Chordata S.sabaBleeker, 1854 Subphylum: Vertebrata S.janesabaBleeker, 1854 Superclass: Pisces S.dekayiStorer, 1855 Class: Osteichthyes Figure 1. Chub mackerel (Scomberjaponicus Houttuyn, 1782) (from Collette & Nauen, 1983) 2 FIR/S 157Scomber/aponicus Subclass: Neopterygii -Specific diagnosis Order: Perciformes la. Space between end of first dorsal fin Suborder: Scombroidei groove and origin of second dorsal fin (x) greater than length of groove (y), Family: Scombridae about 1.5 times as long (Fig. 2a); Subfamily: Scombrinae swimbladderabsent; belly unmarked; 13 precaudal plus 18 caudal verte- Tribe: Scombrini brae; 21 to 28 interneural bones un- Genus: Scomber der first dorsal fin Scomber scombrus lb. Space between end of first dorsal-fin groove and origin of second dorsal fin (x) about equal to or less than length of groove (y) (Fig. 2b); swimbladder present; belly unmarked or marked 1.2.1.2 Generic by spots or wavy broken lines; 14 In 1847, the Count of Buffon reported that the precaudal plus 17 caudal vertebrae; 12 to 20 interneural bones under first "escombro of Japan" (the chub mackerel) was possi- bly a variety of the "mackerel escombro" (Scomber dorsal fin scombrus), as professor Gmelin suspected.
Recommended publications
  • LEVELS in INDIAN MACKEREL Rastrelliger Kanagurta (SCOMBRIDAE) from KARACHI FISH HARBOUR and ITS RISK ASSESSMENT Quratulan Ahmed1,*, Levent Bat2
    9(3): 012-016 (2015) Journal of FisheriesSciences.com E-ISSN 1307-234X © 2015 www.fisheriessciences.com ORIGINAL ARTICLE Research Article MERCURY (Hg) LEVELS IN INDIAN MACKEREL Rastrelliger kanagurta (SCOMBRIDAE) FROM KARACHI FISH HARBOUR AND ITS RISK ASSESSMENT Quratulan Ahmed1,*, Levent Bat2 1The Marine Reference Collection and Resources Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270 Pakistan 2University of Sinop, Fisheries Faculty, Department of Hydrobiology, TR57000 Sinop, Turkey Received: 03.04.2015 / Accepted: 24.04.2015 / Published online: 28.04.2015 Abstract: The present study was conducted to determine Hg levels in edible tissues of the Indian mackerel Rastrelliger kanagurta collected at Karachi Harbour of Pakistan between March 2013 and February 2014. Hg levels ranged from 0.01 to 0.09 with mean ± SD 0.042 ± 0.023 mg/kg dry wt. The Hg level in R. kanagurta is relatively low when compared to those studied in other parts of the world and is able to meet the legal standards by EU Commission Regulation and other international food standards. The findings obtained were also compared with established allowable weekly intake values. It is concluded that the Hg levels in the Indian mackerel from Karachi coasts did not exceed the permission limits (0.5 mg/kg). The results show that the Indian mackerel appears to be useful bio-indicator due to their accumulation of Hg, however, continued sampling is required for further researches. Keywords: Mercury, Rastrelliger kanagurta, Bio-indicator, Karachi fish harbour, Pakistan *Correspondence to: Quratulan Ahmed, The Marine Reference Collection and Resources Centre, University of Karachi, Karachi, 75270 Pakistan E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +92 (345) 2983586 12 Journal of FisheriesSciences.com Ahmed Q and Bat L 9(3): 012-016 (2015) Journal abbreviation: J FisheriesSciences.com Introduction exposure route possibly allowing metal biomagnification up trophic levels in the Indian mackerel R.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Prospects of Mackerel and Tuna Fishery in Bangladesh
    Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh Item Type article Authors Rahman, M.J.; Zaher, M. Download date 27/09/2021 01:00:11 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34189 Bangladesh]. Fish. Res.) 10(1), 2006: 85-92 Status and prospects of mackerel and tuna fishery in Bangladesh M. J. Rahman* and M. Zaher1 Marine Fisheries & Technology Station, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute Cox's Bazar 4700, Bangladesh 1Present address: BFRI, Freshwater Station, Mvmensingh 2201, Bangladesh *Corresponding author Abstract Present status and future prospects of mackerel and tuna fisheries in Bangladesh were assessed during July 2003-June 2004. The work concentrated on the fishing gears, length of fishes, total landings and market price of the catch and highlighted the prospects of the fishery in Bangladesh. Four commercially important species of mackerels and tuna viz. Scomberomorus guttatus, Scomberomorus commerson, Rastrelliger kanagurta, and Euthynnus affinis were included in the study. About 95% of mackerels and tuna were caught by drift gill nets and the rest were caught by long lines ( 4%) and marine set-bag-net (1 %). Average monthly total landing of mackerels and tunas was about 264 t, of which 147 t landed in Cox's Bazar and 117 tin Chittagong sites. Total catches of the four species in Cox's Bazar and Chittagong sites were found to be 956 and 762 t, respectively. The poor landing was observed during January-February and the peak landing was in November and July. Gross market value of the annual landing of mackerels and tunas (1,718 t) was found to be 1,392 lakh taka.
    [Show full text]
  • Nocturnal Feeding of Pacific Hake and Jack Mackerel Off the Mouth of the Columbia River, 1998-2004: Implications for Juvenile Salmon Predation Robert L
    This article was downloaded by: [Oregon State University] On: 16 August 2011, At: 13:01 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Transactions of the American Fisheries Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/utaf20 Nocturnal Feeding of Pacific Hake and Jack Mackerel off the Mouth of the Columbia River, 1998-2004: Implications for Juvenile Salmon Predation Robert L. Emmett a & Gregory K. Krutzikowsky b a Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, 2030 South Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon, 97365, USA b Cooperative Institute of Marine Resource Studies, Oregon State University, 2030 South Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon, 97365, USA Available online: 09 Jan 2011 To cite this article: Robert L. Emmett & Gregory K. Krutzikowsky (2008): Nocturnal Feeding of Pacific Hake and Jack Mackerel off the Mouth of the Columbia River, 1998-2004: Implications for Juvenile Salmon Predation, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 137:3, 657-676 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/T06-058.1 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Ration of Japanese Spanish Mackerel Scomberomorus Niphonius Larvae
    FISHERIES SCIENCE 2001; 67: 238–245 Original Article Daily ration of Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius larvae J SHOJI,1,* T MAEHARA,2,a M AOYAMA,1 H FUJIMOTO,3 A IWAMOTO3 AND M TANAKA1 1Laboratory of Marine Stock-enhancement Biology, Division of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8502, 2Toyo Branch, Ehime Prefecture Chuyo Fisheries Experimental Station, Toyo, Ehime 799-1303, and 3Yashima Station, Japan Sea-farming Association, Takamatsu, Kagawa 761-0111, Japan SUMMARY: Diel successive samplings of Japanese Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius larvae were conducted throughout 24 h both in the sea and in captivity in order to estimate their daily ration. Using the Elliott and Persson model, the instantaneous gastric evacuation rate was estimated from the depletion of stomach contents (% dry bodyweight) with time during the night for wild fish (3.0–11.5 mm standard length) and from starvation experiments for reared fish (8, 10, and 15 days after hatching (DAH)). Japanese Spanish mackerel is a daylight feeder and exhibited piscivorous habits from first feeding both in the sea and in captivity. Feeding activity peaked at dusk. The esti- mated daily ration for wild larvae were 111.1 and 127.2% in 1996 and 1997, respectively; and those for reared larvae ranged from 90.6 to 111.7% of dry bodyweight. Based on the estimated value of daily rations for reared fish, the total number of newly hatched red sea bream Pagrus major larvae preyed by a Japanese Spanish mackerel from first feeding (5 DAH) to beginning of juvenile stage (20 DAH) in captivity was calculated to be 1139–1404.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Fishing Effects on the Southern Benguela Fish Community Using an Individual-Based Model: Learning from a Comparison with Ecosim
    Ecosystem Approaches to Fisheries in the Southern Benguela Afr. J. mar. Sci. 26: 95–114 2004 95 SIMULATIONS OF FISHING EFFECTS ON THE SOUTHERN BENGUELA FISH COMMUNITY USING AN INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL: LEARNING FROM A COMPARISON WITH ECOSIM Y-J. SHIN*, L. J. SHANNON† and P. M. CURY* By applying an individual-based model (OSMOSE) to the southern Benguela ecosystem, a multispecies analysis is proposed, complementary to that provided by the application of ECOPATH/ECOSIM models. To reconstruct marine foodwebs, OSMOSE is based on the hypothesis that predation is a size-structured process. In all, 12 fish species, chosen for their importance in terms of biomass and catches, are explicitly modelled. Growth, repro- duction and mortality parameters are required to model their dynamics and trophic interactions. Maps of mean spatial distribution of the species are compiled from published literature. Taking into account the spatial component is necessary because spatial co-occurrence determines potential interactions between predatory fish and prey fish of suitable size. To explore ecosystem effects of fishing, different fishing scenarios, previously examined using ECOSIM, are simulated using the OSMOSE model. They explore the effects of targeting fish species in the southern Benguela considered to be predators (Cape hake Merluccius capensis and M. paradoxus) or prey (anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus, sardine Sardinops sagax, round herring Etrumeus whiteheadi). Simulation results are compared and are generally consistent with those obtained using an ECOSIM model. This cross-validation appears to be a promising means of evaluating the robustness of model outputs, when separate validation of marine ecosystem models are still difficult to perform.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee Fish Species
    The Angler’s Guide To TennesseeIncluding Aquatic Nuisance SpeciesFish Published by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Cover photograph Paul Shaw Graphics Designer Raleigh Holtam Thanks to the TWRA Fisheries Staff for their review and contributions to this publication. Special thanks to those that provided pictures for use in this publication. Partial funding of this publication was provided by a grant from the United States Fish & Wildlife Service through the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency Authorization No. 328898, 58,500 copies, January, 2012. This public document was promulgated at a cost of $.42 per copy. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency is available to all persons without regard to their race, color, national origin, sex, age, dis- ability, or military service. TWRA is also an equal opportunity/equal access employer. Questions should be directed to TWRA, Human Resources Office, P.O. Box 40747, Nashville, TN 37204, (615) 781-6594 (TDD 781-6691), or to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Human Resources, 4401 N. Fairfax Dr., Arlington, VA 22203. Contents Introduction ...............................................................................1 About Fish ..................................................................................2 Black Bass ...................................................................................3 Crappie ........................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries of the Northeast
    FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEAST AMERICAN BLUE LOBSTER BILLFISHES ATLANTIC COD MUSSEL (Blue marlin, Sailfish, BLACK SEA BASS Swordfish, White marlin) CLAMS DRUMS BUTTERFISH (Arc blood clam, Arctic surf clam, COBIA Atlantic razor clam, Atlantic surf clam, (Atlantic croaker, Black drum, BLUEFISH (Gulf butterfish, Northern Northern kingfish, Red drum, Northern quahog, Ocean quahog, harvestfish) CRABS Silver sea trout, Southern kingfish, Soft-shelled clam, Stout razor clam) (Atlantic rock crab, Blue crab, Spot, Spotted seatrout, Weakfish) Deep-sea red crab, Green crab, Horseshoe crab, Jonah crab, Lady crab, Northern stone crab) GREEN SEA FLATFISH URCHIN EELS (Atlantic halibut, American plaice, GRAY TRIGGERFISH HADDOCK (American eel, Fourspot flounder, Greenland halibut, Conger eel) Hogchoker, Southern flounder, Summer GROUPERS flounder, Winter flounder, Witch flounder, (Black grouper, Yellowtail flounder) Snowy grouper) MACKERELS (Atlantic chub mackerel, MONKFISH HAKES JACKS Atlantic mackerel, Bullet mackerel, King mackerel, (Offshore hake, Red hake, (Almaco jack, Amberjack, Bar Silver hake, Spotted hake, HERRINGS jack, Blue runner, Crevalle jack, Spanish mackerel) White hake) (Alewife, Atlantic menhaden, Atlantic Florida pompano) MAHI MAHI herring, Atlantic thread herring, Blueback herring, Gizzard shad, Hickory shad, Round herring) MULLETS PORGIES SCALLOPS (Striped mullet, White mullet) POLLOCK (Jolthead porgy, Red porgy, (Atlantic sea Scup, Sheepshead porgy) REDFISH scallop, Bay (Acadian redfish, scallop) Blackbelly rosefish) OPAH SEAWEEDS (Bladder
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Billfish Resources and the Billfish Fisheries in the Western
    SLC/FIAF/C1127 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular ISSN 2070-6065 STATUS OF BILLFISH RESOURCES AND BILLFISH FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC Source: ICCAT (2015) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1127 SLC/FIAF/C1127 (En) STATUS OF BILLFISH RESOURCES AND BILLFISH FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN CENTRAL ATLANTIC by Nelson Ehrhardt and Mark Fitchett School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami Miami, United States of America FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bridgetown, Barbados, 2016 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109436-5 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate DFNQRZOHGJHPHQWRI)$2DVWKHVRXUFHDQGFRS\ULJKWKROGHULVJLYHQDQGWKDW)$2¶VHQGRUVHPHQWRI XVHUV¶YLHZVSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVLVQRWLPSOLHGLQDQ\ZD\ All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Snakeheadsnepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN a Biologicalmyanmar Synopsis Vietnam
    Mongolia North Korea Afghan- China South Japan istan Korea Iran SnakeheadsNepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN A BiologicalMyanmar Synopsis Vietnam and Risk Assessment Philippines Thailand Malaysia INDIAN OCEAN Indonesia Indonesia U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 SNAKEHEADS (Pisces, Channidae)— A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment By Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. Copyrighted material reprinted with permission. 2004 For additional information write to: Walter R. Courtenay, Jr. Florida Integrated Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 7920 N.W. 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 For additional copies please contact: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams Snakeheads (Pisces, Channidae)—A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment / by Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams p. cm. — (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1251) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN.0-607-93720 (alk. paper) 1. Snakeheads — Pisces, Channidae— Invasive Species 2. Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment. Title. II. Series. QL653.N8D64 2004 597.8’09768’89—dc22 CONTENTS Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Literature Review and Background Information . 4 Taxonomy and Synonymy .
    [Show full text]
  • Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗
    Does Climate Change Bolster the Case for Fishery Reform in Asia? Christopher Costello∗ I examine the estimated economic, ecological, and food security effects of future fishery management reform in Asia. Without climate change, most Asian fisheries stand to gain substantially from reforms. Optimizing fishery management could increase catch by 24% and profit by 34% over business- as-usual management. These benefits arise from fishing some stocks more conservatively and others more aggressively. Although climate change is expected to reduce carrying capacity in 55% of Asian fisheries, I find that under climate change large benefits from fishery management reform are maintained, though these benefits are heterogeneous. The case for reform remains strong for both catch and profit, though these numbers are slightly lower than in the no-climate change case. These results suggest that, to maximize economic output and food security, Asian fisheries will benefit substantially from the transition to catch shares or other economically rational fishery management institutions, despite the looming effects of climate change. Keywords: Asia, climate change, fisheries, rights-based management JEL codes: Q22, Q28 I. Introduction Global fisheries have diverged sharply over recent decades. High governance, wealthy economies have largely adopted output controls or various forms of catch shares, which has helped fisheries in these economies overcome inefficiencies arising from overfishing (Worm et al. 2009) and capital stuffing (Homans and Wilen 1997), and allowed them to turn the corner toward sustainability (Costello, Gaines, and Lynham 2008) and profitability (Costello et al. 2016). But the world’s largest fishing region, Asia, has instead largely pursued open access and input controls, achieving less long-run fishery management success (World Bank 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fish Management Plan
    Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • © Iccat, 2007
    A5 By-catch Species APPENDIX 5: BY-CATCH SPECIES A.5 By-catch species By-catch is the unintentional/incidental capture of non-target species during fishing operations. Different types of fisheries have different types and levels of by-catch, depending on the gear used, the time, area and depth fished, etc. Article IV of the Convention states: "the Commission shall be responsible for the study of the population of tuna and tuna-like fishes (the Scombriformes with the exception of Trichiuridae and Gempylidae and the genus Scomber) and such other species of fishes exploited in tuna fishing in the Convention area as are not under investigation by another international fishery organization". The following is a list of by-catch species recorded as being ever caught by any major tuna fishery in the Atlantic/Mediterranean. Note that the lists are qualitative and are not indicative of quantity or mortality. Thus, the presence of a species in the lists does not imply that it is caught in significant quantities, or that individuals that are caught necessarily die. Skates and rays Scientific names Common name Code LL GILL PS BB HARP TRAP OTHER Dasyatis centroura Roughtail stingray RDC X Dasyatis violacea Pelagic stingray PLS X X X X Manta birostris Manta ray RMB X X X Mobula hypostoma RMH X Mobula lucasana X Mobula mobular Devil ray RMM X X X X X Myliobatis aquila Common eagle ray MYL X X Pteuromylaeus bovinus Bull ray MPO X X Raja fullonica Shagreen ray RJF X Raja straeleni Spotted skate RFL X Rhinoptera spp Cownose ray X Torpedo nobiliana Torpedo
    [Show full text]