DOCSLIB.ORG

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.12.2015 SWD(2015)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.12.2015 SWD(2015) EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 7.12.2015 SWD(2015) 261 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions An Aviation Strategy for Europe {COM(2015) 598 final} EN EN Table of Content CHAPTER I 'THE SUCCESS STORY OF EU AVIATION' ...................................................................7 1. A history of EU Aviation Policy ......................................................................................................7 2. The impact of EU Aviation Policy .................................................................................................15 3. The competitiveness of the different parts of the aviation value network ......................................20 3.1 Competitiveness of EU airlines in the global context ..............................................................20 3.2 Competitiveness of EU airports in the global context .............................................................24 3.3 Competitiveness of Air Navigation Services Providers (ANSPs), auxiliary industry, manufacturing .........................................................................................................................28 4. The future of the EU aviation sector in the world ..........................................................................32 CHAPTER II 'A COMPETITIVE EU AVIATION SECTOR TO IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY, GROWTH AND JOBS' ......................................................................................35 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................35 2. Enhancing the competitiveness of the EU air transport sector .......................................................36 2.1 A competitive assessment ........................................................................................................36 2.2 Competitiveness in the public opinion .....................................................................................36 3. Connectivity matters .......................................................................................................................37 3.1 Definitions, sources of analysis ...............................................................................................38 3.2 Connectivity within Europe .....................................................................................................39 3.3 Connectivity vis-à-vis other world regions ..............................................................................41 3.4 Connectivity gaps ....................................................................................................................43 3.5 Facilitating Member States' action for regional connectivity ..................................................43 3.6 Promoting international connectivity to the benefit of European consumers and businesses ...............................................................................................................................44 4. The profitability of the EU aviation value chain ............................................................................46 4.1 Promoting market access for EU airlines ................................................................................47 4.2 Insolvency laws in Europe .......................................................................................................48 5. The capacity and performance challenges ......................................................................................50 5.1 Completion of the Single European Sky (SES) .......................................................................51 5.2 Airport capacity: revision of the Slot Regulation and role of the Airport Observatory ..........53 5.3 The quality, efficiency and cost challenge at EU airports. The role of the Thessaloniki Forum of Airport Charges Regulators ....................................................................................56 CHAPTER III 'HIGH STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC CONFIDENCE, GROWTH AND JOBS' ..........61 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................61 2. Revising the EU aviation safety system .........................................................................................61 2.1 The safety picture of the EU aviation sector. Regulation 216/2008: lessons learned .............61 2.2 The way forward ......................................................................................................................62 2.3 The international dimension of the EU aviation safety system ...............................................65 3. Addressing security threats and vulnerabilities to civil aviation ....................................................67 3.1 The cost of aviation security. Investment in security: the One-Stop-Security concept ...........68 2 3.2 Aviation security equipment ....................................................................................................69 3.3 Air cargo security .....................................................................................................................69 3.4 The cybersecurity challenge ....................................................................................................69 4. Addressing decarbonisation, environmental protection and human health ....................................71 4.1 Environment in the public consultation ...................................................................................71 4.2 CO2 emissions: the climate change challenge .........................................................................71 4.3 Air traffic noise. Emissions and noise at airports ....................................................................72 4.4 Inter-modality ..........................................................................................................................73 4.5 Environmental sustainability of air transport ...........................................................................75 5. Addressing social, employment and change managements issues in civil aviation .......................75 5.1 A state of play ..........................................................................................................................75 5.2 Change management in civil aviation. .....................................................................................78 5.3 Highly mobile workers (contracts, social security and taxation) .............................................80 5.4 Airlines' rule shopping for air licences ....................................................................................81 5.5 Atypical forms of employment in civil aviation ......................................................................81 5.6 The international dimension ....................................................................................................82 6. Addressing social issues in air traffic management .......................................................................82 6.1. Problems for air traffic resulting from industrial action .........................................................82 6.2 Air traffic controller (ATCO) mobility ....................................................................................83 7. Passenger rights and consumer protection: Revision of the passenger rights' regulation. Application of the existing rules ....................................................................................................83 7.1 Revision of the passenger rights' regulation ............................................................................84 8. Consumer protection in civil aviation ............................................................................................84 9. High standards in business conduct & unfair practices in the global aviation market ...................86 CHAPTER IV 'HIGH STANDARDS FOR INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE IN EUROPE' .........88 1. Setting the foundation for a high standard Single European Sky institutional governance ...........88 2. High standards in cooperation and coordination between European aviation organizations .........88 CHAPTER V 'STRENGTHENING EUROPEAN AVIATION THROUGH RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND INVESTMENT' ..............................................................................................90 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................90 2. Flightpath 2050 and strategic research and innovation agenda (SRIA) recommendations ............91 3. Modernization of ATM through SESAR Research and Deployment ............................................94 4. Development of new types of aircraft and air vehicles ..................................................................96 4.1 Safe development of drone operations .....................................................................................97 4.2 Improving certification as gate from research to innovation. ..................................................99 5. Digitalising European aviation to the benefit of both cargo and passenger transport ..................100 5.1 Improving infrastructure and service provision by deploying and optimising the use of ICT ....................................................................................................................................100
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Magisterarbeit / Master's Thesis
    MAGISTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Magisterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Krisenkommunikation Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Flugzeugunglücks der Lufthansa-Tochter Germanwings am 24. März 2015 verfasst von / submitted by Raffaela ECKEL, Bakk. phil. angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. phil.) Wien, 2016 / Vienna, 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: A 066 841 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sabine Einwiller Eidesstattliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit an Eides statt, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne Benutzung anderer als der angegebenen Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Die aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommenen Gedanken sind als solche kenntlich ge- macht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen Prü- fungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Wien, August 2016 Raffaela Eckel Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Einführung und Problemstellung ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Theoretische Hinführung: Beitrag der Wissenschaft zu einer gelungenen Krisenkommunikation.................................................................................................... 2 1.2
    [Show full text]
  • Key Data on Sustainability Within the Lufthansa Group Issue 2012 Www
    Issue 2012 Balance Key data on sustainability within the Lufthansa Group www.lufthansa.com/responsibility You will fi nd further information on sustainability within the Lufthansa Group at: www.lufthansa.com/responsibility Order your copy of our Annual Report 2011 at: www.lufthansa.com/investor-relations The new Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental The new Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental is the advanced version of one of the world’s most successful commercial aircraft. In close cooperation with Lufthansa, Boeing has developed an aircraft that is optimized not only in terms of com- fort but also in all dimensions of climate and environmental responsibility. The fully redesigned wings, extensive use of weight-reducing materials and innova- tive engine technology ensure that this aircraft’s eco-effi ciency has again been improved signifi cantly in comparison with its predecessor: greater fuel effi - ciency, lower emissions and signifi cant noise reductions (also see page 27). The “Queen of the Skies,” as many Jumbo enthusiasts call the “Dash Eight,” offers an exceptional travel experience in all classes of service, especially in the exclusive First Class and the entirely new Business Class. In this way, environmental effi ciency and the highest levels of travel comfort are brought into harmony. Lufthansa has ordered 20 aircraft of this type. Editorial information Published by Deutsche Lufthansa AG Lufthansa Group Communications, FRA CI Senior Vice President: Klaus Walther Concept, text and editors Media Relations Lufthansa Group, FRA CI/G Director: Christoph Meier Bernhard Jung Claudia Walther in cooperation with various departments and Petra Menke Redaktionsbüro Design and production organic Marken-Kommunikation GmbH Copy deadline 18 May 2012 Photo credits Jens Görlich/MO CGI (cover, page 5, 7, 35, 85) SWISS (page 12) Brussels Airlines (page 13) Reto Hoffmann (page 24) AeroLogic (page 29) Fraport AG/Stefan Rebscher (page 43) Werner Hennies (page 44) Ulf Büschleb (page 68 top) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    Consistently safeguarding the future Annual Report 2015 Lufthansa Group The Lufthansa Group is the world’s leading aviation group. Its portfolio of companies consists of hub airlines, point-to-point airlines and aviation service companies. Its combination of business segments makes the Lufthansa Group a globally unique aviation group whose integrated value chain not only offers financial synergies but also puts it in a superior position over its competitors in terms of know-how. Key figures Lufthansa Group 2015 2014 Change in % Revenue and result Total revenue €m 32,056 30,011 6.8 of which traffic revenue €m 25,322 24,388 3.8 EBIT1) €m 1,676 1,000 67.6 Adjusted EBIT €m 1,817 1,171 55.2 EBITDA1) €m 3,395 2,530 34.2 Net profit / loss €m 1,698 55 2,987.3 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 32,462 30,474 6.5 Equity ratio % 18.0 13.2 4.8 pts Net indebtedness €m 3,347 3,418 – 2.1 Cash flow from operating activities €m 3,393 1,977 71.6 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 2,569 2,777 – 7.5 Key profitability and value creation figures EBIT margin % 5.2 3.3 1.9 pts Adjusted EBIT margin % 5.7 3.9 1.8 pts EBITDA margin 1) % 10.6 8.4 2.2 pts EACC €m 323 – 223 ROCE % 7.7 4.6 3.1 pts Lufthansa share Share price at year-end € 14.57 13.83 5.3 Earnings per share € 3.67 0.12 2,958.3 Proposed dividend per share € 0.50 – Traffic figures 2) Passengers thousands 107,679 105,991 1.6 Freight and mail thousand tonnes 1,864 1,924 – 3.1 Passenger load factor % 80.4 80.1 0.3 pts Cargo load factor % 66.3 69.9 – 3.6 pts Flights number 1,003,660 1,001,961 0.2 Employees Average number of employees number 119,559 118,973 0.5 Employees as of 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Communication
    Crisis communication The case of the airline industry during the COVID-19 pandemic Marlies Nittmann Supervisor: Robert Ciuchita Department of Marketing Hanken School of Economics Helsinki 2021 i HANKEN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Department of: Type of work: Marketing Master’s Thesis Author: Date: 31.3.2021 Marlies Nittmann Title of thesis: Crisis Communication: The case of the airline industry during the COVID-19 pandemic Abstract: Due to the increasing frequency of crises and the diversification of their causes, a wide range of research has been completed in this field. However, the crisis communication literature has not yet thoroughly covered the topic of public health crises and the corporate communication during such a global event. Further, examples of crisis communication used by companies in particular industries are limited. Therefore, this thesis studies the crisis communication literature to receive a better understanding of the theory before looking at the corporate communications from four European airline companies. A comparative case study approach is used in order to receive an insight into the communication strategies applied by the aviation industry during a pandemic. A quantitative study is conducted, and the web pages, newsletters and press releases are analysed. Based on the conducted research, six main topics of communication are established and compared to the previous findings of the literature. Even though the four case companies share similar information with their stakeholders, they differ in the way they approach the messages, how they communicate and when they engage with their stakeholders. This study adds to the crisis communication literature focusing on public health crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to the literature covering crisis communication in the aviation industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport Industry Analysis Report
    Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2016 Final Report March 2017 European Commission Annual Analyses related to the EU Air Transport Market 2016 328131 ITD ITA 1 F Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 Final Report March 2015 Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 MarchFinal Report 201 7 European Commission European Commission Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate General for Mobility and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract MOVE/E1/5-2010/SI2.579402. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Mobility and Transport DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: European Commission - DG MOVE - Library (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 Brussels e-mail (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/contact/index_en.htm) Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 W www.mottmac.com Issue and revision record StandardSta Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description ndard A 28.03.17 Various K.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair Introduces Direct Flights from Larnaka to Brussels
    2016 REVIEW SPONSORED BY: 1 www.atn.aero 2015 REVIEW • Ryanair introduces direct flights from Larnaka to Brussels JANUARY 4/1/2016 14/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today launched fresh legal action in a bid to overturn a German court’s decision to revoke the approval for 29 of its • Genève Aéroport welcomed a total of nearly 15.8 million passengers codeshare flights with airberlin in 2015 • ALTA welcomes Enrique Cueto as new President of its Executive 5/1/2016 Committee • Spirit Airlines, Inc. today announced Robert L. Fornaro has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer, effective immediately 6/1/2016 • FAA releases B4UFLY Smartphone App 7/1/2016 • The International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced it is expanding its activities to prevent payment fraud in the air travel industry • Boeing delivered 762 commercial airplanes in 2015, 39 more than the previous year and most ever for the company as it enters its centennial year • Rynair become the first airline to carry over 100m international Source: LATAM customers in one year • American Airlines and LATAM Airlines Group are applying for • BOC Aviation orders 30 A320 Family regulatory approval to enter into a joint business (JB) to better serve their customers • Bordeaux Airport 2015 review: Nearly 5,300,000 passengers in 2015: growth of +7.6% 15/1/2016 • Etihad Airways today welcomed the ruling by the higher administrative 8/1/2016 court in Luneburg reversing an earlier judgment and allowing it to • The European Commission has approved under the EU Merger continue operating
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Unfair Commercial Practices on Competition in the EU Passenger Transport Sector, in Particular Air Transport
    STUDY Requested by the ECON committee The Impact of Unfair Commercial Practices on Competition in the EU Passenger Transport Sector, in particular Air Transport Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies Authors: F. SCIAUDONE, K. NOTI, H. SCHEBESTA, F. MORETTI, M. PIANTONI, R. ARANCIO EN PE 642.381 - April 2020 The Impact of Unfair Commercial Practices on Competition in the EU Passenger Transport Sector, in particular Air Transport Abstract The study aims at identifying and analysing the unfair commercial and trading practices in passenger air transport that not only are detrimental to consumers, but which can also distort competition in the Single Market. The study analyses the main air carrier business models and price patterns, as well as the decisions adopted by the national competent authorities with regard to unfair commercial practices and predatory pricing. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Francesco SCIAUDONE, Grimaldi Studio Legale; Kletia NOTI, Grimaldi Studio Legale; Hanna SCHEBESTA, Blue & Stars Legal Research; Francesca MORETTI, Grimaldi Studio Legale; Martina PIANTONI, Grimaldi Studio Legale; Rosaria ARANCIO, Grimaldi Studio Legale ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Radostina PARENTI EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Janetta CUJKOVA LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house
    [Show full text]
  • Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health
    Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37945632 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health Alexander Chu Wu A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Science in the Department of Environmental Health Harvard University Boston, Massachusetts May, 2018 Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Marc G. Weisskopf Alexander Chu Wu Occupation, Environment, and Mental Health ABSTRACT Despite a decades-old call for better understanding of the role of environmental pollutant influences on mental health, a comprehensive review of the literature on non-occupational exposures to environmental pollutants and adult mental health has not been performed. Second, the Germanwings Flight 9525 crash has brought the sensitive subject of airline pilot mental health to the forefront in aviation. Third, scientists use biomarkers to evaluate metal exposures. One biomarker, toenails, is easily obtained and minimally invasive, but less commonly used as a biomarker of exposure. Their utility will depend on understanding characteristics of their variation in a population over time. Fourth, toenails are less commonly used as a biomarker of exposure and has not been evaluated on its relationship with psychiatric outcomes; particularly depression and anxiety.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019
    Ref. Ares(2021)636251 - 26/01/2021 Flight Standards Directorate Air Operations Department EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019) Air Operations Department TE.GEN.00400-006 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Page 1 of 119 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Aggregated Information Report (01 January 2018 to 31 December 2019) Document ref. Status Date Contact name and address for enquiries: European Union Aviation Safety Agency Flight Standards Directorate Postfach 10 12 53 50452 Köln Germany [email protected] Information on EASA is available at: www.easa.europa.eu Report Distribution List: 1 European Commission, DG MOVE, E.4 2 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Participating States 3 EASA website Air Operations Department TE.GEN.00400-006 © European Union Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Page 2 of 119 EU Ramp Inspection Programme Annual Report 2018 - 2019 Table of Contents Executive summary ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 Lufthansa Group
    Annual Report 2016 Lufthansa Group The Lufthansa Group is the world’s leading aviation group. Its portfolio of companies consists of network airlines, point-to-point airlines and aviation service companies. Its combination of business segments makes the Lufthansa Group a globally unique aviation group. T001 Key figures Lufthansa Group 2016 2015 Change in % Revenue and result Total revenue €m 31,660 32,056 – 1.2 of which traffic revenue 1) €m 24,661 25,506 – 3.3 EBIT €m 2,275 1,676 35.7 Adjusted EBIT €m 1,752 1,817 – 3.6 EBITDA €m 4,065 3,395 19.7 Net profit / loss €m 1,776 1,698 4.6 Key balance sheet and cash flow statement figures Total assets €m 34,697 32,462 6.9 Equity ratio % 20.6 18.0 2.6 pts Net indebtedness €m 2,701 3,347 – 19.3 Cash flow from operating activities €m 3,246 3,393 – 4.3 Capital expenditure (gross) €m 2,236 2,569 – 13.0 Key profitability and value creation figures EBIT margin % 7.2 5.2 2.0 pts Adjusted EBIT margin % 5.5 5.7 – 0.2 pts EBITDA margin % 12.8 10.6 2.2 pts EACC €m 817 323 152.9 ROCE % 9.0 7.7 1.3 pts Lufthansa share Share price at year-end € 12.27 14.57 – 15.8 Earnings per share € 3.81 3.67 3.8 Proposed dividend per share € 0.50 0.50 0.0 Traffic figures 2) Passengers thousands 109,670 107,679 1.8 Available seat-kilometres millions 286,555 273,975 4.6 Revenue seat-kilometres millions 226,633 220,396 2.8 Passenger load factor % 79.1 80.4 – 1.4 pts Available cargo tonne-kilometres millions 15,117 14,971 1.0 Revenue cargo tonne-kilometres millions 10,071 9,930 1.4 Cargo load factor % 66.6 66.3 0.3 pts Total available tonne-kilometres millions 43,607 40,421 7.9 Total revenue tonne-kilometres millions 32,300 29,928 7.9 Overall load factor % 74.1 74.0 0.1 pts Flights number 1,021,919 1,003,660 1.8 Employees Average number of employees number 123,287 119,559 3.1 Employees as of 31.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Task Force on Measures Following the Accident of Germanwings Flight 9525 Final Report
    Task Force on Measures Following the Accident of Germanwings Flight 9525 Final Report Page 1 of 19 © European Aviation Safety Agency. All rights reserved. ISO9001 Certified. Proprietary document. Copies are not controlled. Confirm revision status through the EASA-Internet/Intranet. An agency of the European Union Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Cockpit Doors – Safety and Security .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 2-persons-in-the cockpit recommendation ....................................................................................... 6 3.2 Cockpit door manual lock .................................................................................................................. 8 4 Aeromedical Checks .................................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 The initial and continuous assessment of pilots ............................................................................... 8 4.2 Drugs and alcohol testing ................................................................................................................ 11 4.3 The aero-medical examiner framework .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Can Lufthansa Successfully Limit Its Liability to the Families of the Victims of Germanwings Flight 9525 Under the Montreal Convention?
    航空宇宙政策․法學會誌 第 30 卷 第 2 號 논문접수일 2015. 12. 6 2015년 12월 30일 발행, pp. 279~310 논문심사일 2015. 12. 20 게재확정일 2015. 12. 26 Can Lufthansa Successfully Limit its Liability to the Families of the Victims of Germanwings flight 9525 Under the Montreal Convention? 71) Ronnie R. Gipson Jr.* Contents Ⅰ. Introduction Ⅱ. Background Ⅲ. The Montreal Convention Applies to the Germanwings Accident Ⅳ. The United States Cannot Serve as a General Forum for Claims Under the Montreal Convention Ⅴ. Montreal Convention Article 17 Ⅵ. Conclusion * Ronnie R. Gipson Jr. is an Assistant Professor of Law in the Global Law Department of Soongsil University in Seoul where he teaches comparative US law courses for Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Constitutional Law, and Aviation & Aerospace Law. Professor Gipson received his B.A. from Texas A & M University and his J.D. from the University of San Francisco- School of Law. While in law school, Professor Gipson externed for the Honorable Maria-Elena James, Chief Magistrate Judge for the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California. After law school, Professor Gipson represented clients in multi-party complex and class action litigation as well as a variety of clients at different levels in the aviation industry. He has written law review articles focusing on progressive changes in aviation law. The focus of his first law review article is closely connected to pending legislation that is presently working its way through the U.S. Congress. Professor Gipson contributed to creating the legislation that seeks to create statutory immunity for federal appointee examiners. 280 航空宇宙政策·法學會誌 第 30 卷 第 2 號 Ⅰ.
    [Show full text]