This is a repository copy of Neighbouring and mixta in thirteenth-century Ashkenaz. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/92336/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Frojmovic, E (2017) Neighbouring and mixta in thirteenth-century Ashkenaz. In: Frojmovic, E and Karkov, C, (eds.) Postcolonising the Medieval Image. Routledge , pp. 241-260. ISBN 978-1-4724-8166-5 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315232164 © 2017, Taylor & Francis. This is an author produced version of a book chapter published in Postcolonising the Medieval Image. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing
[email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
[email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 Neighbouring and mixta in thirteenth-century Ashkenaz Eva Frojmovic In a 2009 lecture, Jeffrey Cohen asked: ‘What happens between Christian and Jew, in that interspace where temporal, cultural, geographic, theological partitions break down?’ He showed that it is possible to glimpse, even in seemingly recalcitrant texts, ‘narratives of coinhabitance more vivacious and complex than the reductive, hostile, and historically frozen representations at their surfaces’.1 The value of attending to coinhabitance or neighbouring/proximity, he suggested, is that ‘Jewish-Christian coinhabitation can open a dialogic and reciprocal space (or network) where all identities are susceptible to change … a heterodox space born of proximity…’.