DOCSLIB.ORG

Pennsylvania's Criminal Justice System:

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pennsylvania's Criminal Justice System: If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. C/l-Si./l I- 5"--1-1'1 This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on Pennsylvania's this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality. Criminal Justice System: 5 1.0 1111/3. AN OVERVIEW 1.1 I 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 MICROCOPY R~SOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS·1963·" Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. :,-~ Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official' position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. National Institute of Justice' United States Deparimertt of Justice I\1arch, 1984 ... Washington, D. C. ,20!;31, PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY , IJl2?l~4' I , cl' ~''i'"'' ·<>.;:'-='~~~'t:..-::::::'_' __ ' ..... ... ~-~--~----.- r 93!57 !l\( \~ l! ~ I I ! PENNSYLVANIA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: .. AN OVERVIEW 1 I l MARCH, 1984 t " PENNSYLVANIA COMMISSION ON CRIME AND DELINQUENCY P. o. Box 1167, Federal Square Station Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-1167 ! 93857 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice Alfred Blumstein James Thomas This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the Chairman Executive Director person or organization orlglnaling iI. Points of view or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or pOlicies of the Nalional Institute of Justice. Permission 10 reproduce this copyrighted material has been Proj ect Staff !j[!Inted by.··. • •• pennsylvan~a Commiss~on on crJ..Ire & Delinquency John Kunkle Stephen Spangenberg to the National Criminal Just/ce Reference Service (NCJRS). Richarq. Trynoski Further reproduct/on outside of the NCJRS system requires permls· slon of the copyright owner. --1 PREFACE The governmental response to street crime in Pennsylvania is a multi-faceted approach involving primarily state and local agencies. The purpose of this document is to provide basic information about Pennsylvania's Criminal Justice System. This report describes how the system is designed to work by functional component citing the agencies which are responsible for maintenance of the system. i During the spring of 1983, the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and I Delinquency, in response to a request from the legislative leadership, I prepared a briefing paper on the criminal justice system for presentation I to freshman legislators. Based upon the favorable reaction to this initial document, the Commission surveyed state criminal justice agencies to determine the need for a primer describing the operation of the criminal justice system. With input from these agencies, the document was expanded to its present form. It is hoped that this report will fill the need of state agencies responsible for the training of criminal justice personnel for a basic text ( and resource document. This report should also be useful to criminal justice personnel desiring to review the operation of portions of the system other than their own and to educating individuals unfamiliar with the system and its operation. I The information contained herein was gleaned principally from the annual reports published by the respective agencies. Due to the complexities inherent in the system and a desire to provide a concise document, the material presented should be regarded as a highlight of the system rather than an exhaustive review. In addition, this report is based upon the information available as of I December 1983. The reader must keep in mind that the criminal justice system and its components are not static. Administrative, legislative and judicial actions and the concerns of the public continually bring change to the system. " Caution should be exercised in using this document as a source of legislative mandates or judicial procedural rules since these are subject to constant change. Where appropriate, citations are provided as a guide to reference material that may be used to obtain the most current information. Some of the terms used in describing the sY,etem may not be familiar to the reader. A glossary of terms has been offered as Appendix A to facilitate an understanding of the material pr~sented. The following information will hopefully provide a practical base of knowledge about our criminal justice system as well as a handy reference to pertinent facts concerning the dimensions of Pennsylvania's resJ?onse to crime. and the criminal offender. i \ 1.I .... I 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS IX. The State Budget and Criminal Justice Budget Program Summary ...................................... 58 I. Crime in Pennsylvania ................................................................................ .. 1 x. Appendix A II. The Criminal Justice System ~ Process and }fanpower •••••••••.••• 5 Glossary of Terms - Alphabetic listing of criminal III. Law Enforcement ............. ~ ........................ CI ............................ L ...................... .. 10 justice terminologJT ......................................... 63 XI. Office of Attorney General ••••••••••••••••• 12 Appendix B Pennsylvania State Police •••••••••••••••••• 13 A list of the state associations affiliated ~7ith the IV. Courts ................ 0 ......................................... Il ............................. .. 15 various criminal justice components •.•.•••..•••••••••• ....... 73 Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts ••••••••••••••••••• 22 Prosecution ••••••••••••• 23 Public Defense •••••••••. .. ................... 23 Support Personnel •••••••••• .. .. .. • 0 ................................................. 24 V. Institutional Corrections ......•....•.•.•..•.......••........•. 25 Bureau of Correction.................................................. .. .......... .. 25 County Prisons and Jails ••••••••••••••••••••••••• 28 Division of Forensic Services ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 29 VI. Non-Institutional Corrections •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 31 Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole .•••••••••••••• 31 County Probation and Parole •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 32 VII. The Juvenile Justice System.................................... 34 r ! Juvenile Ac t .................................................................................................... .. 34 I Contact ~ith Juvenile Justice Agencies ••••• 35 Juvenile Court ........................................................ .. 36 ! Detention ............................ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. • • • • • • • • • • • II •••••••••• 37 j Adjudication ••••••••••••• .. .. .. .. .. .. 40 t Disposition •••••••••••• 40 ( Juvenile Probation •••• 42 1 Insti tutions .................................................. 43 Juvenile Court Judges' Commission.......... • ••• 44 Office of Children, Youth and Families ••••.•••••••••••••••••••• 46 I I VIII. Other S ta te Agencies ...................... ., ................... 48 ri Commission on Crime and Delinquency •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 48 .1 Commission on Sentencing............ ••••••• •• 52 Crime Victim's Compensation Board........ • •••••• 53 1 Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence ••••••••••••• 54 Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape................... •• 54 Board of Pardons ....................................... 55 f.. Crime Commission ......................... ~ .......•............. 57 • ! \ I ii II 0 iii d~ CRIME IN PENNSYLVANIA -1 I There are two methods currently employed to measure the incidence of I 1 crime. The method most widely recognized observes crimes reported to ,j police as reflected in the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR). A second method ~ relies upon what are referred to as victimization data, which are gathered by the Bureau of the Census as part of the National Crime Survey and reflect both reported and unreported crimes. There are advantages and disadvantages inherent in both systems of reporting. I The UCR is compiled on an annual basis, is usually available in May I following the calendar year reported, and is reported by local I jurisdiction. Its limitation is that only crimes reported to the police , '1 are reflected. This is a major drawback since the victimization surveys suggest that collectively less than half of all crime is reported to police. The. following table offers the relationship of reported and If, unreported crime for 1980. I PERCENT OF VICTIMIZATIONS REPORTED TO THE POLICE.19Se I PERSONAL CRIMES RAPE :1 ROBBERY S6.9" 'Il ASSAULT PERSONAL LARCENY CRIMES BURGLARY 61.3" HOUSEHOLD LARCENY HOTOR HICLE "9.3" se lee The extent of the underreporting problem points to a need for greater citizen involvement in and reliance upon the criminal justice system. Functioning of the system is primarily in reaction to its knowledge of criminal acts. Since the system is dependent upon the general citizenry for the vast majority of such knowledge, it is critical that citizens come fOI""N'ard and take an active role in preventing and reporting crimes and assisting in the prosecution of cri:n:l.nals. 1 ~------------ r-------- q flj I j -1 The drawbacks attendant to the use of victimization data for I, The juvenile population is following the downward trend. According to analytical purposes lie in the manner of disseminating results of the Bureau
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOTICES DEPARTMENT of BANKING Actions on Applications
    4211 NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF BANKING Actions on Applications The Department of Banking, under the authority contained in the act of November 30, 1965 (P. L. 847, No. 356), known as the Banking Code of 1965; the act of December 14, 1967 (P. L. 746, No. 345), known as the Savings Association Code of 1967; the act of May 15, 1933 (P. L. 565, No. 111), known as the Department of Banking Code; and the act of December 9, 2002 (P. L. 1572, No. 207), known as the Credit Union Code, has taken the following action on applications received for the week ending July 24, 2007. BANKING INSTITUTIONS Section 112 Applications Date Name of Individual Location Action 7-19-07 J. Donald Steele, Jr., and Northumberland Approved Joanne K. Steele, to acquire up to 35.0% of the shares of common stock of Northumberland Bancorp, Northumberland Interim Charter Applications Date Name of Bank Location Action 7-18-07 Elderton Interim Bank Elderton Approved Elderton and Armstrong County Effective Incorporation of an interim bank in conjunction with the reorganization of Elderton State Bank to create a bank holding company structure. Elderton State Bank will become the wholly-owned subsidiary of Keystrong Financial, Inc., a new holding company in formation. Branch Applications Date Name of Bank Location Action 5-14-07 CommunityBanks 749 East Main Street Opened Millersburg Mount Joy Dauphin County Lancaster County 6-25-07 Beneficial Mutual 1520 Cecil B. Authorization Savings Bank Moore Avenue Surrendered Philadelphia Philadelphia Philadelphia County Philadelphia County 7-12-07 Northwest Savings Bank 605 East Dubois Avenue Authorization Warren Dubois Surrendered Warren County Clearfield County SAVINGS INSTITUTIONS No activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Crime and Criminal Administration in Pennsylvania, 1763-1790
    Women's Crime and Criminal Administration in Pennsylvania, 1763-1790 NN WINTER appeared in court first in the December, 1764, term of Philadelphia County's court of quarter sessions charged Awith felonious theft; she suffered corporal punishment when a jury found against her. In 1770 and again in 1773, she appeared before Lancaster County's general sessions, in the first instance having a count of assault against her dismissed, in the second being convicted of stealing. Back in Philadelphia in September, 1777, she pleaded guilty to a third charge of theft and was sentenced to jail. In April 1779, before the mayor's court in Philadelphia and this time using the alias Mary Flood, Ann Winter was convicted of three counts of larceny and received thirty-nine lashes on her bare back for each conviction. She was by this time known as "a Notorious Thief." Records reveal she was also in "a forlorn condition," the mother of "two fatherless children," and again "big with child." Should she be released and her fine remitted, she promised authorities in November, 1779, they "should never after this time hear of the least blemish against her character As she intended retiring into the country to endeavour for an honest livelihood." Promises aside, Winter was again convicted of larceny in March, 1780, this time in oyer and terminer proceedings, and once more suffered corporal punishment and confinement. She was also judged guilty of larceny in the mayor's court in July, 1782, and in July, 1785, and pleaded guilty to still another charge of theft in April, 1784.
    [Show full text]
  • Epilogue on the Lack of African-American (And Other)
    EPILOGUE ON THE LACK OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN (AND OTHER) ORGANIZED CRIME RESEARCH THE RELATIVE DEARTH OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN ORGANIZED CRIME RESEARCH I began this research in 1992 when a colleague asked me if I could investigate the activities and networks of an African-American gangster named Jack Brown.1 My associate was particularly interested in Brown’s operations in the Philadelphia region in the 1970s. Local and federal law enforcement officials in the area did not have – or at least did not offer – much information on Jack Brown, though they did maintain extensive files on a relatively large and significant organized crime group named the “Black Mafia”. When I was first introduced to the topic, and more importantly shown the voluminous files within several agencies, my reaction was one of amazement. The files were substantial. Many of the group’s activities, as has been demonstrated in the pages above, were notorious – the DuBrow Furniture robbery/arson/murder, the Hanafi murders, the misappropriation of community “seed” money, the murder of Major Coxson, and the complex role of Philadelphia’s Black Muslim Mosque #12 – including the relationships of boxing legend Muhammad Ali to Major Coxson and to Jeremiah Shabazz. In addition to other noteworthy aspects of the group, there were the astronomical number of internecine murders, and the facts that two of the Black Mafia founding members spent time on the FBI’s Most Wanted list (which has only listed 458 people since its inception), and that for a time the group accounted for 80% of the city’s heroin market. Then there were the significant activities of Black Mafia members as they rotated in and out of the prison system over the course of approximately 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania Juvenile Justice Task Force
    THE PENNSYLVANIA JUVENILE JUSTICE TASK FORCE REPORT & RECOMMENDATIONS June 2021 Table of Contents Members of the Pennsylvania Juvenile Justice Task Force ............................................ 3 Executive Summary of Findings .................................................................................... 4 Overview of Task Force Recommendations................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 Key Findings ............................................................................................................... 12 Policy Recommendations ............................................................................................ 30 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 43 Appendices ................................................................................................................. 44 Appendix I: Glossary of Terms ................................................................................. 45 Appendix II: County Data Maps ............................................................................... 46 Appendix III: Financial Obligations by County ......................................................... 50 Appendix IV: Data Sources and Methods ................................................................ 56 Appendix V: System Flowchart ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crime, Justice, and Order in the North Carolina Piedmont, 1760-1806
    STROUD, JASON MICHAEL, Ph.D. Crime, Justice, and Order in the North Carolina Piedmont, 1760-1806. (2019) Directed by Dr. Greg O’Brien. 345 pp. This dissertation examines crime and disorder in the North Carolina Piedmont between 1760 and 1806, exploring the ways that criminal justice and the law were enforced in the region. It is rooted in an analysis of the colonial and state Superior Court records from Salisbury and Hillsborough and traces the process by which authorities— first the colonial government and then the revolutionary state—attempted to establish and maintain order in the region. This most basic function of criminal justice necessarily involved the identification of individuals and groups of people as criminals by the state. I argue that understanding this legal and juridical process, which marked many of the people of the region as unfit subjects and citizens, helps provide a framework for understanding the turmoil and disorder that characterized the Revolutionary era in the region. As the North Carolina government sought to assert its legitimacy through imposing order, it marked presumptively disorderly men and women including horse thieves, land squatters, “Regulators,” Loyalists, and, significantly, the enslaved, as outlaws. Faced with alienation from legal and political legitimacy, these people resisted, articulating in the process a different conception of justice, one rooted in the social, political, and cultural realities of the region. This dissertation, then, traces a pattern of conflict and turmoil that reveals very different, and at times diametrically opposed, understandings of justice between governing elites and local men and women in the Piedmont. Moreover, by focusing on the interrelated issues of criminality, justice, and order, this work attempts to deepen scholarly understanding of the Revolution in the North Carolina backcountry, in particular the ways it affected the relationship between individuals and the state.
    [Show full text]
  • 1990 Crime Commission Report
    1 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA JOINT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY In re: 1990 Crime Commission Report ***** Stenographic report of hearing held in Room 461, Main Capitol Building, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Wednesday, April 25, 1990 1:00 p.m. HON. THOMAS CALTAGIRONE, JOINT CHAIRMAN SEN. MICHAEL FISHER, JOINT CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF JOINT COMMITTEES ON JUDICIARY Sen. John Hopper Hon. Jeffrey E. Piccola Hon. Paul McHale Hon. John Pressmann Hon. Terrence McVerry Hon. Robert D. Reber Hon. Nicholas B. Moehlmann Hon. Karen A. Ritter Also Present: David Krantz, Executive Director Katherine Manucci, Staff Mary Woolley, Republican Counsel Paul Dunkleberger, Republican Research Analyst Mary Beth Marschik, Republican Research Analyst Reported by: Ann-Marie P. Sweeney, Reporter ANN-MARIE P. SWEENEY 536 Orrs Bridge Road Camp Hill, PA 17011 2 INDEX PAGE Michael J. Reilly, Esquire, Chairman, Pennsylvania Crime Commission 3 3 SENATOR FISHER: We'd like to call the joint meeting of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees to order. I'm Senator Mike Fisher, Vice Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. I'm sitting in for the Chairman, Stewart Greenleaf. And to my right is— REPRESENTATIVE CALTAGIRONE: Representative Tom Caltagirone, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. SENATOR FISHER: We'd invite the other members who are here to identify themselves. SENATOR HOPPER: I'm Senator John Hopper, member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. REPRESENTATIVE REBER: Representative Reber, member of the House Judiciary Committee. REPRESENTATIVE MOEHLMANN: Representative Nick Moehlmann, Minority Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. REPRESENTATIVE PICCOLA: Representative Jeff Piccola, House Judiciary Committee. SENATOR FISHER: With that, we welcome the Chairman of the Pennsylvania Crime Commission, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Locking out Auto Theft 2012 Annual Report 2012 Pa Auto Theft Prevention Authority Annual Report | 1 Contents
    LOCKING OUT AUTO THEFT 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 2012 PA AUTO THEFT PREVENTION AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORT | 1 CONTENTS Letter to the Governor TO THE HONORABLE GOVERNOR TOM CORBETT AND 01 MEMBERS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY: Auto theft remains a costly crime in Pennsylvania, with 15,578 vehicles stolen Who is the Authority? last year* – it is an evolving and complicated crime, often involving violence. The Grantees Pennsylvania Auto Theft Prevention Authority (ATPA) gives grantees the tools to stay current and bust both the major international crime ring and the smaller neighborhood 02 menace. Thieves used to operate solo to hot-wire cars and take them on joyrides. Now, networks of criminals also orchestrate complex schemes to round up cars for sale overseas. Grantees: Juvenile Prevention Training, Legislative Reform ATPA provides the communication network, resources, and training to combat today’s auto theft. We are making a difference. The Commonwealth has once again seen a 04 drop in auto theft. I am pleased to report: • A 10% decrease in auto theft statewide in 2012 • A 19% decrease in auto theft in the greater Philadelphia area Success Stories • ATPA grantees and partners recovered $29M worth of stolen parts and vehicles 06 • ATPA prosecutors obtained orders for perpetrators to pay $1.2M in restitution Restitution is important -- it’s money repaid to victims, money saved by insurance companies, and therefore, savings to our citizens. Prevention and Public Education Insurers that do business in Pennsylvania fund ATPA. It is a smart investment. For every dollar collected from insurance companies since inception, the Authority has realized a return on investment of seven dollars (in vehicles and parts recovered and 08 reduced auto thefts).
    [Show full text]
  • CRIME in PENNSYLVANIA ANNUAL UNIFORM CRIME REPORT During 2017, the Pennsylvania Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Received Data for 1,908 Jurisdictions
    CRIME IN PENNSYLVANIA ANNUAL UNIFORM CRIME REPORT During 2017, the Pennsylvania Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program received data for 1,908 jurisdictions. Contributions to the Program may range from the submission of data for one month to the submission of data for the entire year. Individual agencies may have submitted data for multiple jurisdictions. Contributing jurisdictions and the corresponding number of submissions are identified in the contributing Jurisdictions table. Prior to June 1, 2005, reporting of UCR data by Pennsylvania law enforcement agencies was not mandatory. However, on that date, Act 180 of 2004 became law, mandating UCR for all state, county, and local law enforcement agencies within the Commonwealth. Information contained in this complete report is based on actual data submitted as of the date of compilation. Analysis is based on data that may have been updated after release of preceding years' reports. Contributing Jurisdictions by County # of Submissions Contributing Jurisdiction in 2017 ADAMS ADAMS CO DET 12 ADAMS CO SHERIFF 12 BENDERSVILLE BORO 12 BIGLERVILLE BORO 12 BONNEAUVILLE BORO 12 BUREAU OF FORESTRY 12 CARROLL VALLEY BORO 12 CONEWAGO TWP 12 CUMBERLAND TWP 12 EAST BERLIN BORO 12 EASTERN ADAMS REG - OXFORD TWP 12 FAIRFIELD BORO 12 GETTYSBURG BORO 12 LATIMORE TWP 12 LIBERTY TWP 12 LITTLESTOWN BORO 12 MCSHERRYSTOWN BORO 12 READING TWP 12 ALLEGHENY ALEPPO TWP 12 ALLEGHENY CO D A INVEST BRANCH 12 ALLEGHENY CO POLICE 12 ALLEGHENY CO SHERIFF 12 ALLEGHENY HOUSING AUTHORITY 12 ASPINWALL BORO 12 AVALON BORO 12 BALDWIN BORO 12 BALDWIN TWP 12 BELL ACRES BORO 12 BELLEVUE BORO 12 BEN AVON BORO 12 BEN AVON HEIGHTS 12 BETHEL PARK BORO 12 BLAWNOX BORO 12 BRACKENRIDGE BORO 12 BRADDOCK BORO 12 BRADDOCK HILLS BORO 12 BRENTWOOD BORO 12 BRIDGEVILLE BORO 12 BUREAU OF FORESTRY 12 CARNEGIE BORO 12 CASTLE SHANNON BORO 12 CHESWICK BORO 12 CHURCHILL BORO 12 CLAIRTON CITY 12 Note: Only contributing jurisdictions are listed.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORICAL MEMORIAL CENTER Pennsylvania State Police Oral History Interview Of: Sergeant Pete Buchan
    HISTORICAL MEMORIAL CENTER Pennsylvania State Police Oral History Interview of: Sergeant Pete Buchan Diaz Data Services ~ 331 Schuylkill Street, Harrisburg, PA, 17110 ~ 717-233-6664 PSP-HEMC Buchan 2 INTERVIEWER: This is Amy Baldanari [ph] interviewing Sergeant Pete Buchan on November 16, 2004. Tape one. Tell me a little bit about your background. MR. BUCHAN: Well, I was born in Latrobe September 11, 1936. I was the ninth child. I have four older brothers and four older sisters. My father was a blacksmith and worked at the Latrobe Steel Company. He had also worked in the coalmines as a blacksmith, prior to that. And my mother was a housewife. I lived in Latrobe, attended Latrobe schools, and I graduated Latrobe High School in 1954. INTERVIEWER: How about a little bit about your professional background, your civilian employment. MR. BUCHAN: When I graduated high school in 1954, I enlisted in the United States Air Force in -- July 13 of 1954, and I spent four years in the Air Force. Part of the time was in the United States, Massachusetts, New Jersey, then I went to Europe, and I was in Paris for several years and it was in Paris that I took a competitive examination for the United States Air Force Academy. I passed. I was selected. I was sent back to the Naval Academy Prep School at Bainbridge, Maryland, being that the Air Force Academy was new and did not have a prep school of its own. I stayed there from October to February, at which time I resigned. And when I was doing an exit interview, they wanted to know why I resigned, and I said I wanted to go back to Pennsylvania and become a Pennsylvania State Trooper.
    [Show full text]
  • 1987 0107T.Pdf
    COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME AND CORRECTIONS * * * * In re: House Bill 1565, 1566, 1567, 1569, 1669 * * * * Stenographic report of hearing taken at 22-A, Capitol Annex, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Thursday May 19", 1988 9:30 a.m. HON. KEVIN BLAUM, CHAIRMAN MEMBERS OF JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME AND CORRECTIONS Hon. Michael E. Bortner Hon. Lois Sherman Hagarty Hon. Richard Hayden Hon. Gerad A. Kosinski Hon. Allen Kukovich Hon. Paul nc&ftllft Hon. Jeffrey E. Picoola Also Present; Michael P. Edmiston, Esquire, Chief Counsel House Majority Judiciary Committee Mary Wooley, Esquire, Counsel House Minority Judiciary Committee Sue Germanio Reported by: Dorothy M. Malone, RPR Dorotk4 M Malone Reg uteres! Professional Reporter 135 S L=md.s Street |—lummelstown, Pennsijlvaniei 17036 INDEX TO WITNESSES PAGE Honorable LeRoy Zimmerman, Attorney General 3 Joseph Loftus-Vergari, Director, Luzerne County 42 Children & Youth Services Daniel Mihalko, Director, Prohibited Mailings 67 Postal Inspection Service John Driscoll, President, District Attorney's Assn. 78 Honorable Lois Hagarty 84 Ms. Joanne DeHart, Ms. Josephine Parks, Ms. Anne 92 Vaughan, Parents1 Rights Organization Rev. Thomas Doyle, Dominican House of Studies 111 Betty Miller, Migrant Child Development Program 127 Julia'Danzy, Deputy Secretary, Dept. of Public Welfare 138 Toni Siedl, Social Work Dept., Children's Hospital, 157 Philadelphia Capt. Roger Peacock, and Trp. Jacob Ruth, Missing 169 Persons Unit, PA State Police Robert Schwartz, Esq., Juvenile Law Center 184 Barbara Tremitiere, VOCAL 204 CHAIRMAN BLAUM. Good morning everyone. Welcome to the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Corrections on Child Abuse. Right now I would like to introduce the members who are here today.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Town Mafia: Organized Crime in New Kensington, Pennsylvania Jeanine Mazak-Kahne Indiana University of Pennsylvania N a Co
    small-Town mafia: organized Crime in new KensingTon, Pennsylvania Jeanine Mazak-Kahne Indiana University of Pennsylvania n a cool November day in 1957 New York State troopers sent several well-dressed men scurrying into the countryside Osurrounding the Apalachin home of alleged mob boss Joseph “the Barber” Barbara. While many of the men who traveled there claimed to have come to visit their friend Barbara, it was alleged to be more of a meeting of leading national Mafiosi and their representatives. Among those darting into the woods was Gabriel “Kelly” Mannarino from the small western Pennsylvania town of New Kensington. The actions of the New York State police that day called into question the investigative priorities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation which, under Director J. Edgar Hoover, had long denied the Mafia’s existence, despite Senate investigations pointing to the contrary.1 The Apalachin incident forced Hoover to act, and in doing so he created the Top Hoodlum Program, which required all FBI field offices to maintain surveillance on their region’s “top ten hoodlums.”2 pennsylvania history: a journal of mid-atlantic studies, vol. 78, no. 4, 2011. Copyright © 2011 The Pennsylvania Historical Association This content downloaded from 128.118.152.206 on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:29:43 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PAH 78.4_02_JM_KAHNE.indd 355 11/5/11 11:29:21 AM pennsylvania history figure 1 The Pittsburgh field office, which covers twenty-five counties in Pennsylvania and all of West Virginia, included Gabriel Mannarino and his older brother Samuel among their top ten.3 New Kensington, Pennsylvania, is a small city located twenty miles northeast of Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • American · Colonial and Revolutionary History COLLEGE OUTLINE SERIES
    COLLEGE OUTLINE SERIES NO. 71 In Canada $1.65 "1 American · Colonial and Revolutionary History COLLEGE OUTLINE SERIES Each College Outline (;::1-200) summarizes the essentials of a college subject. The majority of these books sell for $1.00 to $1.95. Many are available in cloth binding at a higher price. ANTHROPOLOGY, SOCIOLOGY ENGLISH, SPEECH (Continued) GENERALANTHROPOLOGY,20 SPEECH: A Handbook of Voice MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 7 Training, Diction and Public PRINCIPLES OF SOCIOLOGY, 26 Speaking, 89 ART, DRAMA, MUSIC TECHNICAL WRITING, 43 WRITING TERM PAPERS AND HISTORY OF ART, 95 REPORTS, 37 HISTORY OF MUSIC, 55 INTRODUCTION TO MUSIC, 109 HISTORY, POLITICAL SCIENCE OUTLINES OF SHAKESPEARE'S PLAYS,25 AMERICAN COLONIAL AND PLAY PRODUCTION, 73 REVOLUTIONARY HISTORY, 71 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, 14 ECONOMICS, BUSINESS, LAW AMERICAN HISTORICAL ACCOUNTING PROBLEMS and How DOCUMENTS, 100 to Solve Them, 85 ANCIENT HISTORY, 1 BUSINESS LAW, 40 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 92 STATES, 77 BUSINESS WRITING, 96 HISTORY OF ENGLAND, 10 CORPORATION FINANCE, 7 HISTORY OF EUROPE 1500·1 . ,8, 11 ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE HISTORY OF EUROPE since 1815, 12 UNITED STATES, 84 HISTORY OF RUSSIA, 66 ELEMENTARY ACCOUNTING 39 LATIN AMERICAN HISTORY, 16 HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT, OUTLINE HISTORY OF THE MIDDLE 62 AGES, 19 MARKETING: An Introduction, 83 POLITICAL SCIENCE, 22 MONEY AND BANKING, 69 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS, 8 112 STATISTICAL METHODS, 27 SURVEY OF ANCIENT, MEDIEVAL TABLES FOR STATISTICIANS, 75 AND MODERN HISTORY,
    [Show full text]