Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta Caretta)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta Caretta) Recovery Plan for the Northwest Atlantic Population of the Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta) Second Revision U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of the Interior National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PREFACE The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.) (ESA), establishes policies and procedures for identifying, listing, and protecting species of wildlife that are endangered or threatened with extinction. The purposes of the ESA are “to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved, [and] to provide a program for the conservation of such endangered species and threatened species...” The ESA defines an “endangered species” as “any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” A “threatened species” is defined as “any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” The Secretaries of the Department of the Interior and the Department of Commerce are responsible for administering the ESA’s provisions as they apply to the loggerhead turtle. Day- to-day management authority for endangered and threatened species under the Departments’ jurisdictions has been delegated to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), respectively. FWS and NMFS (collectively referred to as the Services) share Federal jurisdiction for sea turtles, with FWS having lead responsibility on nesting beaches and NMFS having lead responsibility in the marine environment. To help identify and guide species recovery needs, section 4(f) of the ESA directs the Secretaries to develop and implement recovery plans for listed species. Such plans are to include: (1) a description of site-specific management actions necessary to conserve the species or populations; (2) objective, measurable criteria which, when met, will allow the species or populations to be removed from the endangered and threatened species list; and (3) estimates of the time and funding required to achieve the plan’s goals. Section 4 of the ESA and regulations (50 CFR Part 424) promulgated to implement its listing provisions also set forth the procedures for reclassifying and delisting species on the Federal lists. A species can be delisted if the Secretary of the Interior and/or the Secretary of Commerce determines that the species no longer meets the endangered or threatened status based upon the following five factors listed in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA: (1) the present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range; (2) overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes; (3) disease or predation; (4) the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; and (5) other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence. Further, a species may be delisted, according to 50 CFR Part 424.11(d), if the best scientific and commercial data available substantiate that the species or population is neither endangered nor threatened for one of the following reasons: (1) extinction, (2) recovery, or (3) original data for classification of the species were in error. NMFS approved the initial recovery plan for the loggerhead on September 19, 1984. This initial plan was a multi-species plan for all six species of sea turtles occurring in the U.S. On December 26, 1991, NMFS and FWS approved a separate recovery plan for the U.S. population ii of the loggerhead, focusing on the Atlantic. A separate plan for U.S. Pacific populations of the loggerhead was approved in 1998. In 2001, NMFS and FWS initiated the process to revise the 1991 plan for the loggerhead. An Atlantic Loggerhead Recovery Team, consisting of species experts, was established to draft this revision. Since approval of the first revised plan in 1991, significant research has been accomplished and important recovery activities have been undertaken. As a result, we have a greater knowledge of the species and its status. This second revision of the recovery plan for the Atlantic loggerhead addresses current threats and needs, highlights conservation accomplishments that have been undertaken since the species was listed, and specifically addresses the planning requirements of the ESA. iii DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate such reasonable actions as may be necessary, based upon the best scientific and commercial data available, for the conservation and survival of listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views, official positions, or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Services. They represent the official position of the Services only after they have been signed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Regional Director and/or National Marine Fisheries Service Assistant Administrator. Recovery plans are guidance and planning documents only; identification of an action to be implemented by any public or private party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in any one fiscal year in excess of appropriations made by Congress for that fiscal year in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1341, or any other law or regulation. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Recovery Plan for the Northwest Atlantic Population of the Loggerhead Sea Turtle (Caretta caretta), Second Revision. National Marine Fisheries Service, Silver Spring, MD. ADDITIONAL COPIES MAY BE OBTAINED FROM: National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources 1315 East-West Highway, 13th Floor Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 This recovery plan can be downloaded from: National Marine Fisheries Service’s Office of Protected Resources website: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/recovery/plans.htm#turtles U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Jacksonville Field Office's website: http://www.fws.gov/northflorida Cover photos by Blair E. Witherington. iv RECOVERY TEAM The Services gratefully acknowledge the commitment and efforts of the members of the Recovery Team for the Northwest Atlantic population of the loggerhead sea turtle in the development of this revised recovery plan. Alan B. Bolten, Ph.D. John A. Musick, Ph.D. (Team Leader) The Virginia Institute of Marine Science Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research College of William and Mary University of Florida Barbara A. Schroeder Larry B. Crowder, Ph.D. National Marine Fisheries Service Duke University Marine Laboratory Blair E. Witherington, Ph.D. Mark G. Dodd Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Georgia Department of Natural Resources Kristy J. Long Sandra L. MacPherson (Assistant to the Team) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Marine Fisheries Service ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Recovery Team and the Services gratefully acknowledge the key input and assistance of the following individuals during the revision of the recovery plan: Selina Heppell (Oregon State University) and Melissa Snover (National Marine Fisheries Service). Additional thanks go to the following individuals for their technical assistance during the preparation of the recovery plan: Gloria Bell (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), Kelly Bibb (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), Karen Bjorndal (Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research, University of Florida), Benjamin Bolker (Department of Zoology, University of Florida), Michael Bresette (Quantum Resources, Inc.), Therese Conant (National Marine Fisheries Service), Debby Crouse (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), Peter Eliazar (Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research, University of Florida), Allen Foley (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Matthew Godfrey (North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission), DuBose Griffin (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources), Paul Kubilis (IFAS Statistics Department, University of Florida), Ann Marie Lauritsen (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), Kate Mansfield (The Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary), Anne Meylan (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Sally Murphy (South Carolina Department of Natural Resources), Susan Pultz (National Marine Fisheries Service), Jeffrey Seminoff (National Marine Fisheries Service), James Spotila (Drexel University), Wendy Teas (National Marine Fisheries Service), and Chuck Underwood (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) was listed as threatened throughout its range on July 28, 1978, under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA), and has received Federal protection since that time. Therefore, the entire species is the listed entity. However, in this recovery plan, we have identified recovery units for the Northwest Atlantic loggerhead population. Establishing recovery units is a useful tool for species occurring across wide ranges
Recommended publications
  • United Through Reading Helps Service Members Stay Connected to the Children in Their Lives Through All of the Separations of Military Life
    United Through Reading helps Service Members stay connected to the children in their lives through all of the separations of military life. Whether separated due to duty, training, classes, work-shifts, or deployments, UTR is there to foster bonds, promote resiliency, and build literacy. Following is the list of units and locations participating in the United Through Reading program. CURRENT PROGRAM LOCATIONS: The following list represents the current locations for United Through Reading as of January 31, 2020. This list is updated monthly on our website. For specific information regarding the sites, please email the designated Program Manager, or contact us at [email protected], or 858-481-7323. * The acronym (PRS) denotes Permanent Recording Sites that are available for all Service Members to use. Please note: If live email link does not work for you, copy and paste designated email address into the address of a new email from your email account. U.S. Based Commands State City Base/Installation Command Site Info Branch Program Manager AK Fairbanks Fort Wainwright, Alaska Fort Wainwright Library PRS Army [email protected] AL Fort Rucker Djibouti 1-58th AOB Army [email protected] AL Mobile AL NG Armory AL NG Mobile National Guard [email protected] AZ Mesa AZ NG Armory 2-636rd TSBN National Guard [email protected] AZ Prescott Northern AZ VA Health Care System Northern AZ VA Health Care System PRS Medical [email protected] CA Camp Pendleton Camp Pendleton USS BOXER (VMM-163) Marines [email protected] CA Coronado NAS North
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Mayport Lights Up
    UNITASUNITAS InvadesTakes Over NS Mayport,Mayport, PagesPages 4-54-5 2008 CHINFO Award Winner Vol. 52 • Issue 17 www.nsmayport.navy.mil www.mayportmirror.com THURSDAY, April 30, 2009 NS Mayport Lights Up .,*0$$ Naval Station Mayport Commanding Officer, Capt. Aaron Bowman joined represen- Cinco de Mayo tatives from the base’s Bachelor All Khaki Event Quarters (BQ) and Public Works in lighting up Earth Day with At Foc’sle Club energy-efficient light bulbs. Foc’sle CPO Club wel- On April 22, BQ changed comes all Khaki’s (Chief out approximately 3,000 incan- Petty Officers and Officers) descent light bulbs to Compact and their guests for a Cinco Flourescent Lamps (CFLs) de Mayo celebration start- bulbs in the rooms throughout ing at 4 p.m. on May 5. Free the six BQ buildings. hors d’oeuvres will be served The change out from the from 4-7 p.m. with beverage old incadescent light bulbs specials available all eve- was a part of ENERGY STAR ning. For more information, Operation Change Out (OCO) call 270-5431. held each year. By changing out the incadescent bulbs with the CFLs, NS Mayport can save approximately $200,592. The CFLs have 10,000 hours NEX Rewards For of usage. It will also reduce air pollution by over two million Good Grades pounds of CO2 emissions, the The Navy Exchange wants equivalent of taking 172 cars to help its customers pay off the road for a year. “This is just the first step in for their children’s college -Photo by Paige Gnann education through its A-OK improving our conservation of our resources at Mayport,” !-B-8&@-@5;: -E<;>@;99-:05:3"225/1>-<@->;:;C9-:6;5:?>1<>1?1:@-@5B1?2>;9-/418;>$A->@1>?$?-:0#A.85/ Student Reward Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2013 DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements GAO-13-501 May 2013 DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Highlights of GAO-13-501, a report to congressional committees Requirements Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Over the next couple of years, The Navy’s analysis of the costs and benefits of stationing additional DDG-51 maintenance work available to the ship class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, demonstrated some repair industrial base supporting Naval applicable best practices for analyzing costs and benefits. GAO identified eight Station Mayport is expected to applicable best practices and applied them to the Navy’s discussion of the costs decrease. Section 1017 of the National and benefits of stationing DDG-51 class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport. Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal GAO found that the Navy demonstrated the best practices of clearly defining a Year 2012 required the Navy to problem statement and objectives, and including key facts and assumptions. The analyze the costs and benefits of Navy partially demonstrated the best practices of estimating costs and benefits, stationing additional DDG-51 class and identifying and discussing uncertainty. However, the Navy’s analysis did not destroyers at Naval Station Mayport demonstrate the best practice of describing alternatives, and therefore, it did not and to include other considerations. It compare alternatives or contain recommendations about them.
    [Show full text]
  • 260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103Rd St. Near Cecil Field
    FOR SALE > LAND 260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103rd St. near Cecil Field BRANAN FIELD CHAFFEE RD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32221 23 F i rs t C o a s t E PROPOSED x p SITE WALMART re s sw SUPERCENTER a y / C d Oil & e ar ci v Gas l C JOHN J. SNYDER le o ou m B HIGH SCHOOL dy m an e m rc or e N P a r k 103rd Street w a y 23 OAKLEAF TOWN CENTER FLORIDA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Property Features First Coast Expressway > 260± Acres - Zoned for Industrial Business Park (IBP & IL) > Adjacent to new Amazon Fulfilment Center and Cecil Commerce Center (BTS Lease-back Industrial Park) SITE PROPOSED > Excellent multimodal location offering superior access to the Southeastern U.S. WALMART > Immediate access to the interstate I-10, I-75, I-95 and I-295 highways SUPERCENTER > 12-13 miles to the CSX and Norfolk Southern intermodal facility and 18 miles to FEC’s intermodal hub > 25 miles to JAXPORT Dames Point terminal, 22 miles to Jacksonville International Airport and adjacent to Cecil Field and existing 12,500 foot runway > Pricing: $45,000/Acre Douglas Blair, MSW Robert Selton III COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Managing Director CEO | NORTHEAST FLORIDA NORTHEAST FLORIDA +1 904 861 1101 +1 904 861 1111 76 S. Laura Street, Suite 1500 [email protected] [email protected] Jacksonville, FL 32202 www.colliers.com/jacksonville 7272 JOHN J. SNYDER HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED WALMART SUPERCENTER SITE 103rd Street First Coast Expressway / Cecil Commer ce 23 Ce nt er P a rk OAKLEAF w a y TOWN CENTER OilGas &
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Units in FLORIDA
    U.S. Coast Guard Units in the State of Florida Seventh Coast Guard District Headquarters Office Tel: (305) 415-6670 909 S.E. First Avenue, Suite 944 Miami, FL Coast Guard Air Station Miami Tel: (305) 953-2100 14750 N.W. 44th Court Opa Locka Airport Opa Locka, FL 33054 Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater Tel: (727) 535-1437 15100 Rescue Way Clearwater, FL 33762-1437 Coast Guard Marine Safety Office / Marine Safety Unit Tampa Tel: (813) 228-2191 155 Columbia Drive Tampa, FL 33606-3598 Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit Miami Tel: (305) 278-6700 15608 S.W. 117th Avenue Miami, FL 33177-1630 Coast Guard Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron (HITRON) Jacksonville Tel: (904) 594-6800 6213 Aviation Avenue, Bldg. 1846 Jacksonville, FL 32221-8120 Coast Guard Station St. Petersburg Tel: (727) 824-7670 600 8th Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5099 Coast Guard Station Ft. Myers Beach Tel: (941) 463-5754 719 San Carlos Drive Fort Myers Beach, FL 33931-2221 1 S Coast Guard tation Ft. Pierce Tel: (561) 464-6100 900 Seaway Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34949-3039 Coast Guard Station Islamorada Tel: (305) 664-4404 183 Palermo Drive Islamorada, FL 33036-3317 Coast Guard Station Lake Worth Inlet Tel: (561) 840-8503 3300 Lakeshore Drive Riviera Beach, FL 33404-2406 Coast Guard Station Marathon Tel: (305) 743-1945 1800 Overseas Highway Marathon, FL 33050-2199 Coast Guard Station Ft. Lauderdale Tel: (954) 927-1611 P.O. BOX 537 Broward County Park 7000 N. Ocean Drive Dania, FL 33004-3079 Coast Guard Station Ponce De Leon Inlet Tel: (386) 428-9085 2999 North Peninsula Avenue New Smyrna Beach, FL 32169-2041 Coast Guard Station Port Canaveral Tel: (321) 853-7601 9235 Grouper Road Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-4402 Coast Guard Station Sand Key Tel: (727) 596-8540 1375 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767-2899 Coast Guard Station Key West Tel: (305) 292-8862 Building 101, Trumbo Point Key West, FL 33040-6695 2 Coast Guard Station Yankeetown Tel: (352) 447-6900 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • State Detail Analysis
    United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-01-011 Environmental Protection Emergency Response PB2001-106315 Agency (5305W) June 2001 STATE DETAIL ANALYSIS THE NATIONAL BIENNIAL RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT (BASED ON 1999 DATA) Printed on paper that contains at least 50 percent postconsumer fiber. This page intentionally left blank. National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Based on 1999 Data CONTENTS EXECUTIVE . .SUMMARY . .ES . -1. ALABAMA . 1. ALASKA . 9. ARIZONA . .17 . ARKANSAS . .25 . CALIFORNIA . .33 . COLORADO . .41 . CONNECTICUT . .49 . DELAWARE . .57 . DISTRICT . .OF . .COLUMBIA . .65 . FLORIDA . .73 . GEORGIA . .81 . GUAM . .89 . HAWAII . .97 . IDAHO . .105 . ILLINOIS . .113 . INDIANA . .121 . IOWA . .129 . KANSAS . .137 . KENTUCKY . .145 . LOUISIANA . .153 . MAINE . .161 . MARYLAND . .169 . MASSACHUSETTS . .177 . MICHIGAN . .185 . MINNESOTA . .193 . MISSISSIPPI . .201 . MISSOURI . .209 . MONTANA . .217 . NAVAJO . .NATION . .225 . NEBRASKA . .233 . i National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Based on 1999 Data NEVADA . .241 . NEW . .HAMPSHIRE . .249 . NEW . .JERSEY . .257 . NEW . .MEXICO . .265 . NEW . .YORK . .273 . NORTH . .CAROLINA . .281 . NORTH . .DAKOTA . ..
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update
    FLORIDA Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update TECHNICAL REPORT AUGUST 2014 FLORIDA STATEWIDE AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY UPDATE August 2014 Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceports Office This report was prepared as an effort of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Planning Process under the sponsorship of the Florida Department of Transportation. A full technical report containing information on data collection, methodologies, and approaches for estimating statewide and airport specific economic impacts is available at www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation/economicimpact.shtm. More information on the Florida’s Aviation Economic Impact Study can be obtained from the Aviation and Spaceports Office by calling 850-414-4500. Florida Department of Transportation – Aviation & Spaceports Office Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update August 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1-1 OVERVIEW OF AVIATION’S ECONOMIC IMPACT IN FLORIDA ............................................1-1 TYPES OF AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT MEASURED ......................................................1-2 APPROACH TO MEASURING AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT IN FLORIDA ........................1-2 AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACTS ............................................................................................1-2 VISITOR ECONOMIC IMPACTS .............................................................................................1-3
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE AVIATION Economic Impact Study 3 2 5 7 1 4 6 Technical Report 2019 Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Communicating Results ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Florida’s Airports ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Study Conventions ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.1 Study Terminology .............................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 12 2. Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 FDOT District Results ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Assessment Tool (IAT)
    D. Infrastructure Assessment Tool (IAT) The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) created the Infrastructure Assessment Tool (IAT) to categorize Florida’s airports and assess their abilities to meet specific mission areas. Data was originally obtained for commercial service and general aviation (GA) airports to determine their performance in supporting aviation services when the tool was created in 2012. Data used to evaluate the airports in the IAT has not been updated since it was originally created and many airports have experienced changes to their facilities, activities, carriers, etc. None of these changes are reflected in the IAT data maintained in the Florida Aviation Database (FAD). IAT data is separated by airport classification, then further delineated by airport service categories. The IAT evaluates airport performance based on the data collected within each service category. The IAT was incorporated into the FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office’s (ASO) FAD, the central repository for all data for all of Florida’s aviation facilities. The following three categories were assessed by the IAT for 19 of Florida’s commercial service airports:1 • Tourism (commercial service [CS])/business2 • Air cargo • Intercontinental service Each airport was scored by comparing the “airport service quotient” to the “optimal service quotient” which determines the “airport performance by role,” given as a percentage of the “optimal service quotient.” Table D-1 presents an example from the IAT analysis for a commercial service airport. As shown in the table, performance percentages ranged from 72 to 78 percent, indicating that this sample airport supports tourism and business more than air cargo or intercontinental service.
    [Show full text]
  • Duval County Freight & Logistics Overview
    DUVAL COUNTY FREIGHT & LOGISTICS OVERVIEW FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FDOT MISSION: THE DEPARTMENT WILL PROVIDE A SAFE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT ENSURES THE MOBILITY OF PEOPLE AND GOODS, ENHANCES ECONOMIC PROSPERITY AND PRESERVES THE QUALITY OF OUR ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITIES. January 2013 Duval County FREIGHT & LOGISTICS OVERVIEW COUNTY SEAT LARGEST CITY AREA POPULATION POPULATION GROWTH RATE Jacksonville, FL Jacksonville, FL 918 square miles 864,263 11% (2000-2010) Primary Economic Development Contact: http://www.coj.net • The county seat, Jacksonville, FL is the largest city in land area in the continental United States, and continues to set itself apart with a strong economy, diverse culture, and abundant recreational opportunities. • Mayport Naval Station was commissioned in 1942 and has since grown to be the third largest fleet concentration in the United States. • Joint management agreement with national and state park services gives Jacksonville the largest urban park system in the United States. Top 5 Growing Industries INDUSTRY NET JOB CREATION 1. Finance and Insurance 8,470 2. Retail Trade 5,555 3. Health Care and Social Assistance 2,942 4. Accommodation and Food Services 2,475 5. Administrative, Support, Waste Management 1,739 and Remediation Services Source: Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Labor Market Statistics Center. LEHD State of Florida County Reports-Quarterly Workforce Indicators 2010-2011 Largest Industry Sectors by Employment INDUSTRY SECTORS % OF WORKFORCE 1. Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 15.2% 2. Professional and Business Services 11.6% 3. Education and Health Services 9.9% Source: Enterprise Florida Major Private Sector Employers EMPLOYER BUSINESS LINE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 1. Baptist Health Hospital 8,100 2.
    [Show full text]