DOCSLIB.ORG

Florida Defense Factbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Florida Defense Factbook JANUARY 2020 Contents Florida Military Facts Study Overview ..................................... 2 Total Statewide Economic Impact $94.9 B How Florida Ranks in FY 2018 ........................ 4 Statewide Defense Economic Impacts ................ 6 Percent of Florida Economy 8.9% Northwest Florida Region ............................ 8 Statewide Direct and Indirect Jobs 914,787 Bay County ....................................... 10 Buildings Owned by Military 1 5,922 Escambia County ................................. 11 Total Acreage (all installations) 1 522,734 Okaloosa County ................................. 12 Santa Rosa County ................................ 13 Plant Replacement Value 1 $32.5 Billion North Central Florida Region ........................14 Military Personnel 2 65,267 Bradford County .................................. 17 Civilian Personnel 2 31,367 Northeast Florida Region ...........................18 Clay County ...................................... 20 Military Reserve 2 24,779 Duval County ..................................... 21 National Guard Full-time 3 2,470 East Central Florida Region .........................22 National Guard Traditional Guardsmen 3 10,667 Brevard County ................................... 24 Orange County ................................... 25 Total Veterans Living in Florida 4 1,491,072 Tampa Bay Region ..................................26 Total Military Retirees Living in Florida 5 203,177 Hillsborough County .............................. 28 Pinellas County ................................... 29 1. Department of Defense, Base Structures Report – FY 2018 Baseline 2. Defense Manpower Data Center – Military and Civilian Personnel By Service/ Polk County ...................................... 31 Agency by State/Country (2018) 3. Adjutant General’s Report FY 2018, Committed to Readiness, Florida’s Force – We Southeast Florida Region ...........................32 Work for You 4. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Miami-Dade County .............................. 34 5. Department of Defense, Office of the Actuary Monroe County ................................... 35 South Central Region ............................... 36 Highlands County ................................ 39 Southwest Region ..................................40 Military & Defense Support .........................42 Partnerships .......................................43 Issues Facing the Florida Defense Economy ..........44 1 Contents Florida Military Facts Study Overview ..................................... 2 Total Statewide Economic Impact $94.9 B How Florida Ranks in FY 2018 ........................ 4 Statewide Defense Economic Impacts ................ 6 Percent of Florida Economy 8.9% Northwest Florida Region ............................ 8 Statewide Direct and Indirect Jobs 914,787 Bay County ....................................... 10 Buildings Owned by Military 1 5,922 Escambia County ................................. 11 Total Acreage (all installations) 1 522,734 Okaloosa County ................................. 12 Santa Rosa County ................................ 13 Plant Replacement Value 1 $32.5 Billion North Central Florida Region ........................14 Military Personnel 2 65,267 Bradford County .................................. 17 Civilian Personnel 2 31,367 Northeast Florida Region ...........................18 Clay County ...................................... 20 Military Reserve 2 24,779 Duval County ..................................... 21 National Guard Full-time 3 2,470 East Central Florida Region .........................22 National Guard Traditional Guardsmen 3 10,667 Brevard County ................................... 24 Orange County ................................... 25 Total Veterans Living in Florida 4 1,491,072 Tampa Bay Region ..................................26 Total Military Retirees Living in Florida 5 203,177 Hillsborough County .............................. 28 Pinellas County ................................... 29 1. Department of Defense, Base Structures Report – FY 2018 Baseline 2. Defense Manpower Data Center – Military and Civilian Personnel By Service/ Polk County ...................................... 31 Agency by State/Country (2018) 3. Adjutant General’s Report FY 2018, Committed to Readiness, Florida’s Force – We Southeast Florida Region ...........................32 Work for You 4. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Miami-Dade County .............................. 34 5. Department of Defense, Office of the Actuary Monroe County ................................... 35 South Central Region ............................... 36 Highlands County ................................ 39 Southwest Region ..................................40 Military & Defense Support .........................42 Partnerships .......................................43 Issues Facing the Florida Defense Economy ..........44 1 Study Overview Impacts by the Numbers In its continuing effort to preserve and protect Defense as a Percent of Florida’s military missions and installations, the Total Economy for Each Region Florida Defense Support Task Force commissioned 33.4% Northwest this update to the Florida Defense Industry 15.2% Northeast Economic Impact Analysis in 2019. The update 9.7% East Central utilizes the same econometric forecasting models Defense Contracts and defense-related spending flows as previous studies. This 8.6% Tampa Bay by Industry includes using the REMI PI+ model to estimate total economic 5.6% North Central impacts at the state and county levels. As in previous years, 4.1% Southwest the study relies primarily on data from the REMI model, U.S. 4.0% Southeast Department of Treasury, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Homeland 4.2% South Central Security (DHS), Florida National Guard, DoD Base Structures 2% 52% Report, DoD Green Book, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of 4% Personnel Economic Analysis, and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. by Service The figure below outlines the major differences in direct inputs 22% ¢ Manufacturing between 2014, 2016, and 2018 defense spending. Since the 2016 ¢ Professional and Business Services study, DoD and DHS procurement (contracts) flows to the state 33% ¢ Trade, Transportation, have increased by over 24.5%; salaries to military personnel and Utilities remained relatively stable, increasing by 3.8%; and, transfer ¢ Construction 4th Estate* payments through military retirement payments and Veterans 39% ¢ Other Affairs benefits increased by 4.4%. In all, direct defense-related Coast Guard Army spending in the state of Florida increased by 11.4%, equating to $44 billion in FY 2018. This direct spending rippled through the Air Force Navy / Marines Florida economy generating nearly $95 billion in value-added economic impacts and supported just under 915,000 direct, indirect, and induced jobs. Contracts by Awarding Oce 30% 25% 22% DEPT. OF THE DEPT. OF THE DEPT. OF THE Difference in Direct Spending ($billions) ARMY NAVY AIR FORCE $20 4.4% 9% 5% 3% 7% $15 24.5% $10 DEFENSE U.S. SPECIAL U.S. COAST ALL OTHERS LOGISTICS OPERATIONS GUARD $5 3.8% AGENCY COMMAND (USSOCOM) 2014 2016 2018 2014 2016 2018 2014 2016 2018 Procurement Salaries Transfer * Refers to personnel working in DoD agencies not directly tied to a military branch, such Payments as the Office of the Secretary of Defense, Defense Commissary Agency, DARPA, etc. 2 3 Study Overview Impacts by the Numbers In its continuing effort to preserve and protect Defense as a Percent of Florida’s military missions and installations, the Total Economy for Each Region Florida Defense Support Task Force commissioned 33.4% Northwest this update to the Florida Defense Industry 15.2% Northeast Economic Impact Analysis in 2019. The update 9.7% East Central utilizes the same econometric forecasting models Defense Contracts and defense-related spending flows as previous studies. This 8.6% Tampa Bay by Industry includes using the REMI PI+ model to estimate total economic 5.6% North Central impacts at the state and county levels. As in previous years, 4.1% Southwest the study relies primarily on data from the REMI model, U.S. 4.0% Southeast Department of Treasury, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Department of Homeland 4.2% South Central Security (DHS), Florida National Guard, DoD Base Structures 2% 52% Report, DoD Green Book, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Bureau of 4% Personnel Economic Analysis, and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. by Service The figure below outlines the major differences in direct inputs 22% ¢ Manufacturing between 2014, 2016, and 2018 defense spending. Since the 2016 ¢ Professional and Business Services study, DoD and DHS procurement (contracts) flows to the state 33% ¢ Trade, Transportation, have increased by over 24.5%; salaries to military personnel and Utilities remained relatively stable, increasing by 3.8%; and, transfer ¢ Construction 4th Estate* payments through military retirement payments and Veterans 39% ¢ Other Affairs benefits increased by 4.4%. In all, direct defense-related Coast Guard Army spending in the state of Florida increased by 11.4%, equating to $44 billion in FY 2018. This direct spending rippled through the Air Force Navy / Marines Florida economy generating nearly $95 billion in value-added economic impacts and supported just under 915,000 direct, indirect, and induced jobs. Contracts by Awarding Oce 30% 25% 22% DEPT. OF THE DEPT. OF THE DEPT.
Recommended publications
  • Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R

    Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R

    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “Defense - Military Base Realignments and Closures (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 11 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 31, 197 5 MEMORANDUM TO: JACK MARSH FROM: RUSS ROURKE I discussed the Ft. Dix situation with Rep. Ed Forsythe again. As you may know, I reviewed the matter with Marty Hoffman at noon yesterday, and with Col. Kenneth Bailey several days ago. Actually, I exchanged intelligence information with him. Hoffman and Bailey advised me that no firm decision has as yet been made with regard to the retention of the training function at Dix. On Novem­ ber 5, Marty Hotfman will receive a briefing by Army staff on pos­ sible "back fill'' organizations that may be available to go to Dix in the event the training function moves out.
  • Linkages Study 2015

    Linkages Study 2015

    Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study conducted by The Principi Group and The SPECTRUM Group Team for the Florida Defense Support Task Force February 10, 2015 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………4 Introduction……………….…………………………………………10 Scope of Study………….…………………………………………..10 Methodology……….………………………………………………..11 Analysis…………………………………………………….………..13 Intrastate Linkages…..………………………………………….…14 Interstate Linkages…………………………………………….…..31 Conclusions………….………….…………………………………..54 Recommendations………………………..………………….…….56 Navy Installation Linkages…………………………………...…..58 Air Force Installation Linkages……..………………………...…67 Team Orlando/National Simulation Center Linkages………..83 Coast Guard Linkages…………………………………………….88 National Guard Linkages…………………………………..……102 2 Florida’s Military Installations Linkages Study List of Figures Figure 1. Florida’s Major Military Installations and Ranges………………………….14 Figure 2. Key Command and Control Linkages in Florida……………………………15 Figure 3. Key Command and Control Linkages in South Florida…...………………16 Figure 4. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northeast Florida………………16 Figure 5. Key Command and Control Linkages in Northwest Florida……………...17 Figure 6. Key Communication Support Linkages in Florida…………………………18 Figure 7. Key Communications Support Linkages in Northwest Florida………….18 Figure 8. Key Training Linkages in Florida……………………………………………...20 Figure 9. Key Training Linkages in South Florida……………………………………...20 Figure 10. Key Training Linkages
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
  • United Through Reading Helps Service Members Stay Connected to the Children in Their Lives Through All of the Separations of Military Life

    United Through Reading Helps Service Members Stay Connected to the Children in Their Lives Through All of the Separations of Military Life

    United Through Reading helps Service Members stay connected to the children in their lives through all of the separations of military life. Whether separated due to duty, training, classes, work-shifts, or deployments, UTR is there to foster bonds, promote resiliency, and build literacy. Following is the list of units and locations participating in the United Through Reading program. CURRENT PROGRAM LOCATIONS: The following list represents the current locations for United Through Reading as of January 31, 2020. This list is updated monthly on our website. For specific information regarding the sites, please email the designated Program Manager, or contact us at [email protected], or 858-481-7323. * The acronym (PRS) denotes Permanent Recording Sites that are available for all Service Members to use. Please note: If live email link does not work for you, copy and paste designated email address into the address of a new email from your email account. U.S. Based Commands State City Base/Installation Command Site Info Branch Program Manager AK Fairbanks Fort Wainwright, Alaska Fort Wainwright Library PRS Army [email protected] AL Fort Rucker Djibouti 1-58th AOB Army [email protected] AL Mobile AL NG Armory AL NG Mobile National Guard [email protected] AZ Mesa AZ NG Armory 2-636rd TSBN National Guard [email protected] AZ Prescott Northern AZ VA Health Care System Northern AZ VA Health Care System PRS Medical [email protected] CA Camp Pendleton Camp Pendleton USS BOXER (VMM-163) Marines [email protected] CA Coronado NAS North
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793

    79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793

    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
  • NS Mayport Lights Up

    NS Mayport Lights Up

    UNITASUNITAS InvadesTakes Over NS Mayport,Mayport, PagesPages 4-54-5 2008 CHINFO Award Winner Vol. 52 • Issue 17 www.nsmayport.navy.mil www.mayportmirror.com THURSDAY, April 30, 2009 NS Mayport Lights Up .,*0$$ Naval Station Mayport Commanding Officer, Capt. Aaron Bowman joined represen- Cinco de Mayo tatives from the base’s Bachelor All Khaki Event Quarters (BQ) and Public Works in lighting up Earth Day with At Foc’sle Club energy-efficient light bulbs. Foc’sle CPO Club wel- On April 22, BQ changed comes all Khaki’s (Chief out approximately 3,000 incan- Petty Officers and Officers) descent light bulbs to Compact and their guests for a Cinco Flourescent Lamps (CFLs) de Mayo celebration start- bulbs in the rooms throughout ing at 4 p.m. on May 5. Free the six BQ buildings. hors d’oeuvres will be served The change out from the from 4-7 p.m. with beverage old incadescent light bulbs specials available all eve- was a part of ENERGY STAR ning. For more information, Operation Change Out (OCO) call 270-5431. held each year. By changing out the incadescent bulbs with the CFLs, NS Mayport can save approximately $200,592. The CFLs have 10,000 hours NEX Rewards For of usage. It will also reduce air pollution by over two million Good Grades pounds of CO2 emissions, the The Navy Exchange wants equivalent of taking 172 cars to help its customers pay off the road for a year. “This is just the first step in for their children’s college -Photo by Paige Gnann education through its A-OK improving our conservation of our resources at Mayport,” !-B-8&@-@5;: -E<;>@;99-:05:3"225/1>-<@->;:;C9-:6;5:?>1<>1?1:@-@5B1?2>;9-/418;>$A->@1>?$?-:0#A.85/ Student Reward Program.
  • United States Air Force

    United States Air Force

    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE LIEUTENANT COLONEL DUC L. HO Lieutenant Colonel Duc L. Ho is the Commander of the Air Force Element, Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), Monterey, California. He leads a unit of 130 Air Force Officer and Enlisted students selected to attend NPS in-residence programs. He also conducts professional, personal, and academic mentoring for officers and enlisted personnel destined for future senior leadership positions world-wide. Lt Col Ho received his commission in 2004 from the U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado. As a mobility pilot, he has flown the KC-135R/T and MC-12W aircraft supporting contingency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan providing aerial refueling, intelligence, and reconnaissance. In 2014, Lt Col Ho was selected for the Foreign Area Officer developmental program. He later served at Headquarters Pacific Air Forces as the Southeast Asia Branch Chief, as well as Country Director for Singapore and Vietnam. Prior to assuming his current position, Lieutenant Colonel Ho was the Chief of Flight Safety, 6th Air Refueling Wing, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. Lt Col Ho is a command pilot with more than 3800 flight hours and over 2,100 combat hours in the KC-135R/T and MC-12W, serving in OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM. EDUCATION 2004 Bachelor of Science in Operations Research, United States Air Force Academy, CO 2006 Undergraduate Pilot Training, Vance AFB, OK 2009 Master of Business Administration, Touro University International (TUI), CA 2011 Squadron Officer School, Maxwell AFB, AL 2015 Air Command and Staff College by Correspondence 2016 Master of Arts in National Security Affairs, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA 2020 Aircraft Mishaps Investigation Course, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements

    Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2013 DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements GAO-13-501 May 2013 DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Highlights of GAO-13-501, a report to congressional committees Requirements Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Over the next couple of years, The Navy’s analysis of the costs and benefits of stationing additional DDG-51 maintenance work available to the ship class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, demonstrated some repair industrial base supporting Naval applicable best practices for analyzing costs and benefits. GAO identified eight Station Mayport is expected to applicable best practices and applied them to the Navy’s discussion of the costs decrease. Section 1017 of the National and benefits of stationing DDG-51 class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport. Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal GAO found that the Navy demonstrated the best practices of clearly defining a Year 2012 required the Navy to problem statement and objectives, and including key facts and assumptions. The analyze the costs and benefits of Navy partially demonstrated the best practices of estimating costs and benefits, stationing additional DDG-51 class and identifying and discussing uncertainty. However, the Navy’s analysis did not destroyers at Naval Station Mayport demonstrate the best practice of describing alternatives, and therefore, it did not and to include other considerations. It compare alternatives or contain recommendations about them.
  • 260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103Rd St. Near Cecil Field

    260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103Rd St. Near Cecil Field

    FOR SALE > LAND 260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103rd St. near Cecil Field BRANAN FIELD CHAFFEE RD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32221 23 F i rs t C o a s t E PROPOSED x p SITE WALMART re s sw SUPERCENTER a y / C d Oil & e ar ci v Gas l C JOHN J. SNYDER le o ou m B HIGH SCHOOL dy m an e m rc or e N P a r k 103rd Street w a y 23 OAKLEAF TOWN CENTER FLORIDA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Property Features First Coast Expressway > 260± Acres - Zoned for Industrial Business Park (IBP & IL) > Adjacent to new Amazon Fulfilment Center and Cecil Commerce Center (BTS Lease-back Industrial Park) SITE PROPOSED > Excellent multimodal location offering superior access to the Southeastern U.S. WALMART > Immediate access to the interstate I-10, I-75, I-95 and I-295 highways SUPERCENTER > 12-13 miles to the CSX and Norfolk Southern intermodal facility and 18 miles to FEC’s intermodal hub > 25 miles to JAXPORT Dames Point terminal, 22 miles to Jacksonville International Airport and adjacent to Cecil Field and existing 12,500 foot runway > Pricing: $45,000/Acre Douglas Blair, MSW Robert Selton III COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Managing Director CEO | NORTHEAST FLORIDA NORTHEAST FLORIDA +1 904 861 1101 +1 904 861 1111 76 S. Laura Street, Suite 1500 [email protected] [email protected] Jacksonville, FL 32202 www.colliers.com/jacksonville 7272 JOHN J. SNYDER HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED WALMART SUPERCENTER SITE 103rd Street First Coast Expressway / Cecil Commer ce 23 Ce nt er P a rk OAKLEAF w a y TOWN CENTER OilGas &
  • A Brief History of Air Mobility Command's Air Mobility Rodeo, 1989-2011

    A Brief History of Air Mobility Command's Air Mobility Rodeo, 1989-2011

    Cover Design and Layout by Ms. Ginger Hickey 375th Air Mobility Wing Public Affairs Base Multimedia Center Scott Air Force Base, Illinois Front Cover: A rider carries the American flag for the opening ceremonies for Air Mobility Command’s Rodeo 2009 at McChord AFB, Washington. (US Air Force photo/TSgt Scott T. Sturkol) The Best of the Best: A Brief History of Air Mobility Command’s Air Mobility Rodeo, 1989-2011 Aungelic L. Nelson with Kathryn A. Wilcoxson Office of History Air Mobility Command Scott Air Force Base, Illinois April 2012 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: To Gather Around ................................................................................................1 SECTION I: An Overview of the Early Years ...........................................................................3 Air Refueling Component in the Strategic Air Command Bombing and Navigation Competition: 1948-1986 ...................................................................4 A Signature Event ............................................................................................................5 The Last Military Airlift Command Rodeo, 1990 ...........................................................5 Roundup ................................................................................................................8 SECTION II: Rodeo Goes Air Mobility Command ..................................................................11 Rodeo 1992 ......................................................................................................................13
  • GEN Richard D. Clarke Commander U.S

    GEN Richard D. Clarke Commander U.S

    SOF ISSUE June 2020 Tacticaldefensemedia.com SUSTAINING U.S. SOF GLOBAL DOMINANCE COMMANDER’S CORNER Lt. Gen. COL Warren Darrell Sponsler Williams Chief of Staff Commander Next Gen Combat Defense Logistics Vehicles CFT Agency Army Futures Cmd. Ft. Belvoir, VA Austin, TX n Joint Acquisition Task Force n Hyper-Enabled Operator n PEO Fixed Wing n PEO Rotary Wing n COVID-19 Response n Family of Special Operations Vehicles n Advanced RWS GEN Richard D. Clarke Commander U.S. Special Operations Command Mac Dill AFB, FL Zanfel Now Available in Individual Use Packets! Zanfel® – a safer, faster and more effective option than steroids or antihistamines for relieving poison ivy, oak or sumac. Great for IFAK kitting! (actual size) Packet 1/8oz = Single dose • VA Contract #36F79718D0415 • NSN #6505-01-674-8232 (Box of 20) • NSN #6505-01-674-8237 (Case of 100) • NSN #6505-01-674-8248 (Case of 500) Get Troops Back in Great the Field in 3 Minutes! for Hospital and Battalion Aid Station Tube 1oz = 15 doses Settings! • VA Contract #36F79718D0415 • NSN #6505-01-611-2071 • NSN #6505-01-679-1559 (Case of 12) Call 800-401-4002 or visit www.zanfel.com. Zanfel is a product of Zanfel Laboratories, Inc. ©20 All rights reserved. U.S. Patent No. 6,423,746, No. 7,008,963. Additional patents pending. Zanfel and the Zanfel logo are copyrighted and trademarks of Zanfel Laboratories, Inc., Dakota Dunes, SD. ARMOR & MOBILITY June 2020 COMMANDER’S CORNER Zanfel Now ENSURING ADVANTAGE TO PROTECT NATIONAL INTERESTS GEN Richard D. Clarke Available in Commander U.S.
  • Base Visit Book

    Base Visit Book

    DCN: 12135 Commissioner Base Visit Book Ellsworth Air Force Base, SD And Dyess Air Force Base, TX BRAC Recommendation And Supporting Documentation 21 June 2005 DCN:@ 12135 FOR OF'F'ICIAL USE ONLY i,I "co~~ ,..e ITINERARY FOR BRAC Commissioner Visit \ 1' 1. BRAC will visit Ellsworth Air Force Base on 21 June 05. 2. Purpose: Base Visit Tim Johnson, US Senato of South Dakota 4. Arrive: 0730L, ontracted Driver Casual attiKfor Downtown Event 8. Helpful Numbers: Col Smith - DSN 675-2801 Protocol Office - DSN 675-1205 Command Post - DSN 675-3800 Radisson Hotel - COM 605-348-8300 9. Itinerary: Current as of:06/17/05 9:06 AM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DCN: 12135 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Tuesday. 21 June 0730 Pick up Commissioners at Radisson Hotel (r Vehicle: Contracted Bus Escorted by: Colonel Smith Passengers: Commissioner Skinner, Commissioner Coyle, Commissioner Bilbray, Senator Johnson, Senator Thune, Congresswoman Herseth, Governor Rounds, Mr Art Beauchamp, and staffers 0750 Arrive at Bomb Wing Headquarters, Office Call Attendees: Sen Johnson, Sen Thune, 08 15 Arrive Wing Conference Room Greeted by: Colonel Smith, 2 Lt Col Garrett, Lt C 'C 0935 Arrive at Herges, Base Architect Lt Col Joseph Seufzer, 28 AMXSICC 1005 Depart 37th Squad Ops 1010 Arrive Pride Hanger Greeted by: Lt Col Nav Singh, CESICC and Maj Chris Knutson, CESICEO 1030 Depart Pride Hanger Current as of:06/17/05 9:06 AM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DCN: 12135 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1035 Depart through Bismarck Gate (stop and discuss encroachment? 1040 Enter through Bismarck Gate 1050 Arrive at 3 16 Birch, Prairie View Housing Greeted by: Mr.