Florida Defense Factbook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Florida Defense Factbook FLORIDA DEFENSE FACTBOOK DECEMBER 2017 CONTENTS FLORIDA MILITARY FACTS Study Overview .....................................2 Total Statewide Impact $84.9 Billion How Florida Ranks in FY 2016 ........................4 Statewide Defense Economic Impacts ................6 Percent of Florida Economy 9.2% Northwest Florida Region ............................8 Statewide Direct and Indirect Jobs 801,747 Bay County . 10 Buildings Owned by Military1 6,032 Escambia County . 11 Total Acreage (all installations)1 521,563 Okaloosa County . 12 Santa Rosa County . 13 Plant Replacement Value1 $27.6 Billion North Central Florida Region ........................14 Military Personnel2 56,598 Bradford County . 17 Civilian Personnel2 30,203 Northeast Florida Region ...........................18 Clay County . 20 Military Reserve2 24,155 Duval County . .. 21 National Guard Full-time3 2,184 East Central Florida Region .........................22 National Guard Traditional Guardsmen3 11,274 Brevard County . 24 4 Orange County . 25 Total Veterans Living in Florida 1,559,778 Tampa Bay Region ..................................26 Total Military Retirees Living in Florida5 198,016 Hillsborough County . 28 1 . Pinellas County . 29 Department of Defense, Base Structures Report – FY 2015 Baseline 2 . Defense Manpower Data Center – Military and Civilian Personnel By Service/ Polk County . 31 Agency by State/Country (March 2016) 3 . Adjutant General’s Report FY 2016, Engagement Through Action: Florida’s Force – Southeast Florida Region ...........................32 We Work for You 4 . US Department of Veterans Affairs Miami-Dade County . 34 5 . Department of Defense, Office of the Actuary Monroe County . .. 35 South Central Region ...............................36 Highlands County . 39 Southwest Region ..................................40 Impact of Florida Veterans and Military Retirees .....42 Military & Defense Support .........................43 Partnerships .......................................44 1 STUDY OVERVIEW IMPACTS BY THE To provide a consistent comparison of Florida’s defense NUMBERS industry over time, this 2017 update utilizes the same econometric forecasting models and defense-related Defense as a Percent of spending flows as previous studies. However, in order to bring Total Economy for Each Region higher fidelity to our estimates, this update incorporates Northwest 32.0% distribution data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) for National Guard personnel compensation estimates. 14.3% Northeast Over time, these data are more stable than the U.S. Census 9.1% East Central data utilized in previous updates. The use of these data do 7.6% Tampa Bay 10 Largest not affect the total statewide impact estimates – only how the 4.7% North Central Florida impacts associated with the National Guard are distributed Defense 3.9% Southwest Contractors across the state; otherwise, this update utilizes the same $7.7B 3.3% methodologies, data, and econometric models as in previous Southeast updates. This includes using the REMI PI+ 70 sector model to 3.1% South Central The 10 largest Florida defense contractors estimate total economic impacts at the state and county levels. supplied $7.7 Billion, or roughly 55%, of the $14.0 Billion value of defense procured As in previous years, the study relies primarily on data from goods and services. the REMI model, U.S. Department of Treasury (USASpending), Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Homeland Security, Florida National Guard, DoD Base Structures Report, DoD Green Book, Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, and Bureau of Labor Statistics. The figure below outlines the major differences in direct Nearly 2/3 of all private-sector defense inputs between the 2011, 2014, and 2016 updates. As the contracts ($8.6B) are performed in Brevard, figure shows, procurement (contracts) flows to the state Orange and Okaloosa counties. have increased by over 36.5%. Salaries to military personnel remained relatively stable, decreasing overall by 2.5%. And, transfer payments through military retirement checks and Veterans Affairs benefits, increased by 7.6%. Thus, given these 36.5% overall changes, the impacts presented here are higher than those offered in previous updates. $20,000 Difference in Direct Spending ($billions) Since 2014, Florida grew the value of all defense contracts $15,000 7.6% performed in-state by 36.5% compared to the U.S. at 4.8%. $10,000 36.5% $5,000 2.5% 2011 2016 2014 2016 2011 2014 2016 2014 2011 4.8% Procurement Salaries Transfer Florida U.S. Payments 2 3 HOW FLORIDA RANKS Florida hosts a variety of missions IN FY 2016 that are critical to our Nation’s defense. Air, land, and sea training areas and ranges associated with the Joint Gulf Range Complex host large, complex joint exercises that allow the Florida has the services to train like they will fight, thus bringing nd Largest tremendous advantages to our military . MILITARY Florida is home to three of ten unified combatant 2 commands, hosts two of only four Navy deep water RETIREE ports in the U .S . with adjacent airfields, the military’s population only east coast space launch facility, the Marine Corps’s only maritime prepositioning force facility, Florida has the and one of only three Navy Fleet Readiness Centers, rd Largest as well as several critical research, development, VETERAN training, and evaluation (RDT&E) centers . The DoD’s 3 strategy emphasizes rapidly deployable joint forces, population joint training, access to space, special operations, precision strike, and research & development . Additionally, the Joint Gulf Range Complex connects Florida ranks test and training ranges that extend from Key th in DEFENSE West to Northwest Florida and across the eastern CONTRACTS with Gulf of Mexico . It includes 180,000 square miles of 5 DoD controlled airspace, as well as 724 sq . miles $14 Billion of adjacent land ranges, 3,200 sq . miles of airspace over adjacent land, 17 miles of shoreline access, interconnected radars and 2 launch areas for missiles . Florida ranks The training area contains multiple live-fire bombing th in DoD ranges, including Pinecastle Range, Avon Park Air PERSONNEL Force Range and the Eglin Bombing Range, that allow 5 for simultaneous maritime, air, and land training with 124,500 exercises . Due to its tremendous capabilities and Florida’s commitment to partnership, the Complex is an integral part of DoD’s Training Resources Strategy . 4 5 STATE OF FLORIDA DEFENSE ECONOMIC IMPACT ESTIMATES Total Employment Total State Economic Impacts Impacts of Defense Activities State Economic Impact $ 84.9 Billion Employment 801,747 Jobs Sales Activity $92 .3 Billion Consumption $48 .8 Billion Number of Jobs Per Region 182,449 Northwest Capital Investment $17 .8 Billion 166,406 East Central 163,071 Tampa Bay Direct Defense Spending 127,832 Southeast 115,965 Northeast Procurement $14 .0 Billion 23,625 Southwest 19,074 North Central Salaries $7 .4 Billion 3,325 South Central Pensions & Transfers $18 .2 Billion Total Defense Spending $39.6 Billion n 2016, total defense spending I (direct and indirect) in Florida Impacts by Component was responsible for $84 .9 Billion, or 9 .2 percent, of Federal Military Florida’s gross state product . Total defense spending Economic Impact $78 .2 Billion also accounted for just over 800,000 jobs across the Employment 741,024 Jobs state - many of which are associated with a wage National Guard premium . For example, over $4 .4 Billion was directly spent in Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing . Economic Impact $4 .6 Billion This accounts for over 10,000 direct jobs, which pay Employment 36,978 Jobs an average salary of over $89,000 . This industry pays Coast Guard approximately 85% higher than the state average of Economic Impact $2 .2 Billion $47,055 . Defense spending creates jobs in every county Employment 23,745 Jobs in Florida . The map above displays total job impacts (direct and indirect) across the state . 6 7 NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGION DEFENSE ECONOMIC IMPACT ESTIMATES Total Regional Impact (in Millions) Regional Economic Impact $22,124.5 Employment 182,449 Jobs Sales Activity $13,911 .4 Consumption $10,764 .2 Capital Investment $3,884 .3 Direct Defense Spending (in Millions) Procurement $2,069 .1 Salaries $3,345 .8 he sixteen- Pensions & Transfers $2,590 .8 county Northwest T Total Defense Spending $8,005.7 Florida Region is home to Tyndall Air Force Base, Naval Support Activity Panama City, Eglin Air Impacts by Component (in Millions) Force Base, Hurlburt Field, Naval Air Federal Military Station Whiting Field, Naval Air Station Pensacola, Corry Field and Saufley Economic Impact $20,431 .9 Field . Defense activities in Northwest Employment 170,269 Jobs Florida generate an estimated 182,449 jobs and account for over $22 .1 Billion in National Guard gross regional product (GRP), which is 32% of Economic Impact $1,486 .3 the region’s total gross product . The bulk of the impacts are generated by direct federal military Employment 9,791 Jobs spending, which accounts for nearly 170,269 total (direct and indirect) jobs, followed by the National Coast Guard Guard with 9,791 and Coast Guard with 2,389 total jobs Economic Impact $206 .3 respectively in this region . Employment 2,389 Jobs 8 9 NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGION NORTHWEST FLORIDA REGION BAY COUNTY ESCAMBIA COUNTY Home to: Home to: • Naval Support Activity • Naval Air Station Pensacola Panama City • Corry Station • Tyndall Air Force Base • Saufley Field Naval Support Activity Naval Air Station
Recommended publications
  • United Through Reading Helps Service Members Stay Connected to the Children in Their Lives Through All of the Separations of Military Life
    United Through Reading helps Service Members stay connected to the children in their lives through all of the separations of military life. Whether separated due to duty, training, classes, work-shifts, or deployments, UTR is there to foster bonds, promote resiliency, and build literacy. Following is the list of units and locations participating in the United Through Reading program. CURRENT PROGRAM LOCATIONS: The following list represents the current locations for United Through Reading as of January 31, 2020. This list is updated monthly on our website. For specific information regarding the sites, please email the designated Program Manager, or contact us at [email protected], or 858-481-7323. * The acronym (PRS) denotes Permanent Recording Sites that are available for all Service Members to use. Please note: If live email link does not work for you, copy and paste designated email address into the address of a new email from your email account. U.S. Based Commands State City Base/Installation Command Site Info Branch Program Manager AK Fairbanks Fort Wainwright, Alaska Fort Wainwright Library PRS Army [email protected] AL Fort Rucker Djibouti 1-58th AOB Army [email protected] AL Mobile AL NG Armory AL NG Mobile National Guard [email protected] AZ Mesa AZ NG Armory 2-636rd TSBN National Guard [email protected] AZ Prescott Northern AZ VA Health Care System Northern AZ VA Health Care System PRS Medical [email protected] CA Camp Pendleton Camp Pendleton USS BOXER (VMM-163) Marines [email protected] CA Coronado NAS North
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • NS Mayport Lights Up
    UNITASUNITAS InvadesTakes Over NS Mayport,Mayport, PagesPages 4-54-5 2008 CHINFO Award Winner Vol. 52 • Issue 17 www.nsmayport.navy.mil www.mayportmirror.com THURSDAY, April 30, 2009 NS Mayport Lights Up .,*0$$ Naval Station Mayport Commanding Officer, Capt. Aaron Bowman joined represen- Cinco de Mayo tatives from the base’s Bachelor All Khaki Event Quarters (BQ) and Public Works in lighting up Earth Day with At Foc’sle Club energy-efficient light bulbs. Foc’sle CPO Club wel- On April 22, BQ changed comes all Khaki’s (Chief out approximately 3,000 incan- Petty Officers and Officers) descent light bulbs to Compact and their guests for a Cinco Flourescent Lamps (CFLs) de Mayo celebration start- bulbs in the rooms throughout ing at 4 p.m. on May 5. Free the six BQ buildings. hors d’oeuvres will be served The change out from the from 4-7 p.m. with beverage old incadescent light bulbs specials available all eve- was a part of ENERGY STAR ning. For more information, Operation Change Out (OCO) call 270-5431. held each year. By changing out the incadescent bulbs with the CFLs, NS Mayport can save approximately $200,592. The CFLs have 10,000 hours NEX Rewards For of usage. It will also reduce air pollution by over two million Good Grades pounds of CO2 emissions, the The Navy Exchange wants equivalent of taking 172 cars to help its customers pay off the road for a year. “This is just the first step in for their children’s college -Photo by Paige Gnann education through its A-OK improving our conservation of our resources at Mayport,” !-B-8&@-@5;: -E<;>@;99-:05:3"225/1>-<@->;:;C9-:6;5:?>1<>1?1:@-@5B1?2>;9-/418;>$A->@1>?$?-:0#A.85/ Student Reward Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2013 DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Requirements GAO-13-501 May 2013 DEFENSE INFRASTRUCTURE Navy's Analysis of Costs and Benefits Regarding Naval Station Mayport Demonstrated Some Best Practices and Minimally Addressed Other Highlights of GAO-13-501, a report to congressional committees Requirements Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Over the next couple of years, The Navy’s analysis of the costs and benefits of stationing additional DDG-51 maintenance work available to the ship class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport, Florida, demonstrated some repair industrial base supporting Naval applicable best practices for analyzing costs and benefits. GAO identified eight Station Mayport is expected to applicable best practices and applied them to the Navy’s discussion of the costs decrease. Section 1017 of the National and benefits of stationing DDG-51 class destroyers at Naval Station Mayport. Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal GAO found that the Navy demonstrated the best practices of clearly defining a Year 2012 required the Navy to problem statement and objectives, and including key facts and assumptions. The analyze the costs and benefits of Navy partially demonstrated the best practices of estimating costs and benefits, stationing additional DDG-51 class and identifying and discussing uncertainty. However, the Navy’s analysis did not destroyers at Naval Station Mayport demonstrate the best practice of describing alternatives, and therefore, it did not and to include other considerations. It compare alternatives or contain recommendations about them.
    [Show full text]
  • 260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103Rd St. Near Cecil Field
    FOR SALE > LAND 260± Acres at First Coast Expy. & 103rd St. near Cecil Field BRANAN FIELD CHAFFEE RD, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32221 23 F i rs t C o a s t E PROPOSED x p SITE WALMART re s sw SUPERCENTER a y / C d Oil & e ar ci v Gas l C JOHN J. SNYDER le o ou m B HIGH SCHOOL dy m an e m rc or e N P a r k 103rd Street w a y 23 OAKLEAF TOWN CENTER FLORIDA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD ARMY AVIATION SUPPORT FACILITY UNITED STATES COAST GUARD Property Features First Coast Expressway > 260± Acres - Zoned for Industrial Business Park (IBP & IL) > Adjacent to new Amazon Fulfilment Center and Cecil Commerce Center (BTS Lease-back Industrial Park) SITE PROPOSED > Excellent multimodal location offering superior access to the Southeastern U.S. WALMART > Immediate access to the interstate I-10, I-75, I-95 and I-295 highways SUPERCENTER > 12-13 miles to the CSX and Norfolk Southern intermodal facility and 18 miles to FEC’s intermodal hub > 25 miles to JAXPORT Dames Point terminal, 22 miles to Jacksonville International Airport and adjacent to Cecil Field and existing 12,500 foot runway > Pricing: $45,000/Acre Douglas Blair, MSW Robert Selton III COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Managing Director CEO | NORTHEAST FLORIDA NORTHEAST FLORIDA +1 904 861 1101 +1 904 861 1111 76 S. Laura Street, Suite 1500 [email protected] [email protected] Jacksonville, FL 32202 www.colliers.com/jacksonville 7272 JOHN J. SNYDER HIGH SCHOOL PROPOSED WALMART SUPERCENTER SITE 103rd Street First Coast Expressway / Cecil Commer ce 23 Ce nt er P a rk OAKLEAF w a y TOWN CENTER OilGas &
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Coast Guard Units in FLORIDA
    U.S. Coast Guard Units in the State of Florida Seventh Coast Guard District Headquarters Office Tel: (305) 415-6670 909 S.E. First Avenue, Suite 944 Miami, FL Coast Guard Air Station Miami Tel: (305) 953-2100 14750 N.W. 44th Court Opa Locka Airport Opa Locka, FL 33054 Coast Guard Air Station Clearwater Tel: (727) 535-1437 15100 Rescue Way Clearwater, FL 33762-1437 Coast Guard Marine Safety Office / Marine Safety Unit Tampa Tel: (813) 228-2191 155 Columbia Drive Tampa, FL 33606-3598 Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit Miami Tel: (305) 278-6700 15608 S.W. 117th Avenue Miami, FL 33177-1630 Coast Guard Helicopter Interdiction Tactical Squadron (HITRON) Jacksonville Tel: (904) 594-6800 6213 Aviation Avenue, Bldg. 1846 Jacksonville, FL 32221-8120 Coast Guard Station St. Petersburg Tel: (727) 824-7670 600 8th Avenue SE St. Petersburg, FL 33701-5099 Coast Guard Station Ft. Myers Beach Tel: (941) 463-5754 719 San Carlos Drive Fort Myers Beach, FL 33931-2221 1 S Coast Guard tation Ft. Pierce Tel: (561) 464-6100 900 Seaway Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34949-3039 Coast Guard Station Islamorada Tel: (305) 664-4404 183 Palermo Drive Islamorada, FL 33036-3317 Coast Guard Station Lake Worth Inlet Tel: (561) 840-8503 3300 Lakeshore Drive Riviera Beach, FL 33404-2406 Coast Guard Station Marathon Tel: (305) 743-1945 1800 Overseas Highway Marathon, FL 33050-2199 Coast Guard Station Ft. Lauderdale Tel: (954) 927-1611 P.O. BOX 537 Broward County Park 7000 N. Ocean Drive Dania, FL 33004-3079 Coast Guard Station Ponce De Leon Inlet Tel: (386) 428-9085 2999 North Peninsula Avenue New Smyrna Beach, FL 32169-2041 Coast Guard Station Port Canaveral Tel: (321) 853-7601 9235 Grouper Road Cape Canaveral, FL 32920-4402 Coast Guard Station Sand Key Tel: (727) 596-8540 1375 Gulf Boulevard Clearwater, FL 33767-2899 Coast Guard Station Key West Tel: (305) 292-8862 Building 101, Trumbo Point Key West, FL 33040-6695 2 Coast Guard Station Yankeetown Tel: (352) 447-6900 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Class G Tables of Geographic Cutter Numbers: Maps -- by Region Or
    G3862 SOUTHERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3862 FEATURES, ETC. .C55 Clayton Aquifer .C6 Coasts .E8 Eutaw Aquifer .G8 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway .L6 Louisville and Nashville Railroad 525 G3867 SOUTHEASTERN STATES. REGIONS, NATURAL G3867 FEATURES, ETC. .C5 Chattahoochee River .C8 Cumberland Gap National Historical Park .C85 Cumberland Mountains .F55 Floridan Aquifer .G8 Gulf Islands National Seashore .H5 Hiwassee River .J4 Jefferson National Forest .L5 Little Tennessee River .O8 Overmountain Victory National Historic Trail 526 G3872 SOUTHEAST ATLANTIC STATES. REGIONS, G3872 NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. .B6 Blue Ridge Mountains .C5 Chattooga River .C52 Chattooga River [wild & scenic river] .C6 Coasts .E4 Ellicott Rock Wilderness Area .N4 New River .S3 Sandhills 527 G3882 VIRGINIA. REGIONS, NATURAL FEATURES, ETC. G3882 .A3 Accotink, Lake .A43 Alexanders Island .A44 Alexandria Canal .A46 Amelia Wildlife Management Area .A5 Anna, Lake .A62 Appomattox River .A64 Arlington Boulevard .A66 Arlington Estate .A68 Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial .A7 Arlington National Cemetery .A8 Ash-Lawn Highland .A85 Assawoman Island .A89 Asylum Creek .B3 Back Bay [VA & NC] .B33 Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge .B35 Baker Island .B37 Barbours Creek Wilderness .B38 Barboursville Basin [geologic basin] .B39 Barcroft, Lake .B395 Battery Cove .B4 Beach Creek .B43 Bear Creek Lake State Park .B44 Beech Forest .B454 Belle Isle [Lancaster County] .B455 Belle Isle [Richmond] .B458 Berkeley Island .B46 Berkeley Plantation .B53 Big Bethel Reservoir .B542 Big Island [Amherst County] .B543 Big Island [Bedford County] .B544 Big Island [Fluvanna County] .B545 Big Island [Gloucester County] .B547 Big Island [New Kent County] .B548 Big Island [Virginia Beach] .B55 Blackwater River .B56 Bluestone River [VA & WV] .B57 Bolling Island .B6 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • State Detail Analysis
    United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-01-011 Environmental Protection Emergency Response PB2001-106315 Agency (5305W) June 2001 STATE DETAIL ANALYSIS THE NATIONAL BIENNIAL RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REPORT (BASED ON 1999 DATA) Printed on paper that contains at least 50 percent postconsumer fiber. This page intentionally left blank. National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Based on 1999 Data CONTENTS EXECUTIVE . .SUMMARY . .ES . -1. ALABAMA . 1. ALASKA . 9. ARIZONA . .17 . ARKANSAS . .25 . CALIFORNIA . .33 . COLORADO . .41 . CONNECTICUT . .49 . DELAWARE . .57 . DISTRICT . .OF . .COLUMBIA . .65 . FLORIDA . .73 . GEORGIA . .81 . GUAM . .89 . HAWAII . .97 . IDAHO . .105 . ILLINOIS . .113 . INDIANA . .121 . IOWA . .129 . KANSAS . .137 . KENTUCKY . .145 . LOUISIANA . .153 . MAINE . .161 . MARYLAND . .169 . MASSACHUSETTS . .177 . MICHIGAN . .185 . MINNESOTA . .193 . MISSISSIPPI . .201 . MISSOURI . .209 . MONTANA . .217 . NAVAJO . .NATION . .225 . NEBRASKA . .233 . i National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Based on 1999 Data NEVADA . .241 . NEW . .HAMPSHIRE . .249 . NEW . .JERSEY . .257 . NEW . .MEXICO . .265 . NEW . .YORK . .273 . NORTH . .CAROLINA . .281 . NORTH . .DAKOTA . ..
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update
    FLORIDA Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update TECHNICAL REPORT AUGUST 2014 FLORIDA STATEWIDE AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY UPDATE August 2014 Florida Department of Transportation Aviation and Spaceports Office This report was prepared as an effort of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Planning Process under the sponsorship of the Florida Department of Transportation. A full technical report containing information on data collection, methodologies, and approaches for estimating statewide and airport specific economic impacts is available at www.dot.state.fl.us/aviation/economicimpact.shtm. More information on the Florida’s Aviation Economic Impact Study can be obtained from the Aviation and Spaceports Office by calling 850-414-4500. Florida Department of Transportation – Aviation & Spaceports Office Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study Update August 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1-1 OVERVIEW OF AVIATION’S ECONOMIC IMPACT IN FLORIDA ............................................1-1 TYPES OF AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT MEASURED ......................................................1-2 APPROACH TO MEASURING AVIATION ECONOMIC IMPACT IN FLORIDA ........................1-2 AIRPORT ECONOMIC IMPACTS ............................................................................................1-2 VISITOR ECONOMIC IMPACTS .............................................................................................1-3
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Statewide Aviation Economic Impact Study
    FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATEWIDE AVIATION Economic Impact Study 3 2 5 7 1 4 6 Technical Report 2019 Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Study Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Communicating Results ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Florida’s Airports ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Study Conventions ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.5.1 Study Terminology .............................................................................................................. 10 1.6 Report Organization .................................................................................................................... 12 2. Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 FDOT District Results ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Protection Classes / Wind Zones / Bcegs
    CITIZENS PROTECTION CLASSES / WIND ZONES / BCEGS FIRE PROTECTION CLASSES These pages provide Public Fire Protection Class (1-10) based on ISO’s Public Protection Class Manual. • City, Town or Fire District listings are organized alphabetically by county. The indicated Protection Class contemplates certain distances from the responding fire station and the hydrant. Remember, it is the responding fire department that governs this rating, not the mailing address. • If a fire protection class rating does not have a plus “+” the stated class applies to all class rated risks within the boundaries of the city, town or fire district. • If a fire protection class has a plus “+” the class shown applies only if within 5 road miles of responding fire station and within 1000 feet from hydrant; � Class “8B” community water supply must deliver uninterrupted minimum fire flow of 200 gpm for 20 minutes. For rating purposes a grade “8” will be applied. � Class “9” if within 5 road miles of responding fire station but over 1000 feet from hydrant; � Class “10” if over 5 road miles from responding fire station. Class “10” also applies to unincorporated areas not contained within a Fire District or OPA. Note 1: Cities and towns not included in the listing may be within Fire Districts Note 2: Hydrant distance requirement does not apply when an alternate creditable water supply is available. These exceptions will be noted under specific communities where applicable. Note 3: The PPC ratings in “()” have been added for ease of reference. In most cases, the PPC is cross-referenced to a corresponding Fire District.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Assessment Tool (IAT)
    D. Infrastructure Assessment Tool (IAT) The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) created the Infrastructure Assessment Tool (IAT) to categorize Florida’s airports and assess their abilities to meet specific mission areas. Data was originally obtained for commercial service and general aviation (GA) airports to determine their performance in supporting aviation services when the tool was created in 2012. Data used to evaluate the airports in the IAT has not been updated since it was originally created and many airports have experienced changes to their facilities, activities, carriers, etc. None of these changes are reflected in the IAT data maintained in the Florida Aviation Database (FAD). IAT data is separated by airport classification, then further delineated by airport service categories. The IAT evaluates airport performance based on the data collected within each service category. The IAT was incorporated into the FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office’s (ASO) FAD, the central repository for all data for all of Florida’s aviation facilities. The following three categories were assessed by the IAT for 19 of Florida’s commercial service airports:1 • Tourism (commercial service [CS])/business2 • Air cargo • Intercontinental service Each airport was scored by comparing the “airport service quotient” to the “optimal service quotient” which determines the “airport performance by role,” given as a percentage of the “optimal service quotient.” Table D-1 presents an example from the IAT analysis for a commercial service airport. As shown in the table, performance percentages ranged from 72 to 78 percent, indicating that this sample airport supports tourism and business more than air cargo or intercontinental service.
    [Show full text]