DOCSLIB.ORG

Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Chesapeake Bay Shallow

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program for the period July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019 1 July, 2018 DRAFT Tawes State Office Building – 580 Taylor Avenue – Annapolis, Maryland 21401 410-260-8DNR or toll free in Maryland 877-620-8DNR – dnr.maryland.gov – TTY Users Call via the Maryland Relay Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program for the period July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2019 Prepared by: Tom Parham, Mark Trice, Brian Smith, Diana Domotor, and Ben Cole Resource Assessment Service/Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tawes Building, D-2 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, MD 21401 Website Address: http://dnr.maryland.gov Toll Free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR, ext: 8630 Out of state call: 410-260-8630 TTY users call via the MD Relay: 711 (within MD) Out of state call: 1-800-735-2258 © 2018 Maryland Department of Natural Resources The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual. Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor Printed on Recycled Paper TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................... 1 2. METHODS AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES............................................................ 11 3. FIELD MEASUREMENTS AND SAMPLING................................................................... 19 4. LABORATORY ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 21 5. DATA MANAGEMENT, VERIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION ....................... 24 6. PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL......................................... 28 7. DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING .............................................................................. 30 8. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITY................................................. 31 9. REFERENCES....................................................................................................................... 33 10. APPENDICIES .................................................................................................................... 34 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Shallow-water monitoring for 2018: Bay segment, sample type(s) and Designated Uses for which the collected data will be used to assess water quality criteria............................... 4 Table 2. Water Quality Mapping Cruise Schedule (April through October 2018)........................ 5 Table 3. 2018 Continuous monitoring stations.............................................................................. 8 Table 4. 2018 Water quality mapping calibration stations ............................................................ 9 Table 5. In situ monitor performance checks and acceptance criteria......................................... 11 Table 6. Discrete sample performance checks and acceptance criteria....................................... 11 Table 7. Continuous monitoring in situ water column parameters.............................................. 12 Table 8. Water Quality Mapping in situ water column parameters............................................. 14 Table 9. Shallow Water Monitoring Program Grab Sample Water Column Parameters, Detection Limits, Methods, References, and Holding Times and Conditions ...................................... 16 Table 10. NASL methods ............................................................................................................ 21 Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, D-2, Annapolis, MD 21401 QAPP: Shallow Water Monitoring Program - 1 July, 2018 DRAFT Page i Table 11. Acceptable drift tolerances for YSI 6600EDS/V2/EXO2 sondes following post- calibration check ................................................................................................................... 24 Table 12. Deployment dates for Maryland DNR Continuous Monitoring Sites ......................... 91 Table 13. Sampling Matrix for Maryland DNR Water Quality Mapping Systems..................... 95 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of 2018 continuous monitoring stations and water quality mapping systems, with progress of assessment ................................................................................................. 10 Figure 2. Conceptual diagram of continuous monitoring data management components, including automated data submission from DNR to the Bay Program ........................ 27 Figure 3. Conceptual diagram of water quality mapping data management components, including automated data submission from DNR to the Bay Program ........................ 27 Figure 4: Continuous Monitoring Field Sheet .............................................................................. 43 Figure 5: Continuous Monitoring Calibration Sheet .................................................................... 60 Figure 6: Water Quality Mapping Calibration Sheet.................................................................... 68 Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, D-2, Annapolis, MD 21401 QAPP: Shallow Water Monitoring Program - 1 July, 2018 DRAFT Page ii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AA - Autoanalyzer AMQAW - Analytical Methods and Quality Assurance Workgroup (a workgroup of the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Monitoring Subcommittee) BGA - Blue-Green Algae C - Carbon CBP - EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Program CBPO - EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Program Office CBL - University of Maryland’s Chesapeake Biological Laboratory CDMA - Code Division Multiple Access Chl - Chlorophyll cm - Centimeter CMC - Chlorophyll Measurement Computer CSSP - Coordinated Split Sample Program d - Day DI - Deionized DIWQ - Data Integrity Workgroup (a workgroup of the Chesapeake Bay Program, formerly AMQAW) DNR - Maryland Department of Natural Resources DO - Dissolved Oxygen DU - Designated Use EM - Emission EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EST - Eastern Standard Time EX - Excitation FGDC - Federal Geographic Data Commission FNU - Formazin Nephelometric Units FS - Full Scale g - Gram h - Hour ITAT - Integrated Trends Analysis Team Kd - Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient for Downward Irradiance L - Liter m - Meter MDE - Maryland Department of the Environment MDH - Maryland Department of Health min. - Minute mg - Milligram ml or mL - Milliliter mm - Millimeter mS - Millisiemens mV - Millivolts N - Nitrogen NASL - Nutrient Analytical Services Laboratory NERR - National Estuarine Research Reserve NH4 - Ammonium NIST - National Institute of Science and Technology nm - Nanometer no. - Number NO2 - Nitrite Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, D-2, Annapolis, MD 21401 QAPP: Shallow Water Monitoring Program - 1 July, 2018 DRAFT Page iii NO23 - Nitrate + Nitrite NO3 - Nitrate NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NTU - Nephelometric Turbidity Units OD - Optical Density ODO - Optical Dissolved Oxygen P - Phosphorus PAR - Photosynthetic Active Radiation PC - Particulate Carbon (Organic) PC - Personal Computer PC - Phycocyanin PE - Phycoerythrin PIP - Particulate Inorganic Phosphorus PN - Particulate Nitrogen PO4 - Phosphate PP - Particulate Phosphorus ppt - Parts Per Thousand QA - Quality Assurance QAO - Quality Assurance Officer (Unless otherwise noted, this refers to the DNR QAO) QAPP - Quality Assurance Project Plan QA/QC - Quality Assurance/Quality Control QC - Quality Control R/V - Research Vessel RFU - Relative Fluorescence Units SAS - Statistical Analysis System Sat% - Percent Saturation SAV - Submerged Aquatic Vegetation SpCond - Specific Conductance STAR - Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting Team TCP/IP - Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol TDN - Total Dissolved Nitrogen TDP - Total Dissolved Phosphorus TMAW - Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup TMDL - Total Maximum Daily Load TN - Total Nitrogen TP - Total Phosphorus TPP - Total Particulate Phosphorus trib - Bay Tributary TSS - Total Suspended Solids TVS - Total Volatile Solids µg - Microgram USDI - U.S. Department of the Interior USGS - U.S. Geological Survey VIMS - Virginia Institute of Marine Science VSS - Volatile Suspended Solids YSI - Yellow Springs Instruments C - Degrees Celsius Maryland Department of Natural Resources, 580 Taylor Avenue, D-2, Annapolis, MD 21401 QAPP: Shallow Water Monitoring Program - 1 July, 2018 DRAFT Page iv PREFACE This document is intended to describe in detail the activities conducted under the Shallow Water Monitoring Program of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program. This program includes water quality mapping and continuous monitoring in the tidal tributaries of Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay. This program is funded through The State of Maryland, the United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chesapeake Bay Office and National Estuarine Research Reserve System program, the Dominion Foundation, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, the Oyster Recovery Partnership, the National Aquarium in Baltimore, the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation, and The Nature Conservancy. Maryland Department of Natural
Recommended publications
  • Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay

    Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay

    Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay QH 541.5 Virginia Institute of Marine Science .~8 School of Marine Science 11.:. E-,.:-nr-c-tll Prntecfion figency 083 College of William and Mary F:<;Y~ r r fntrrnai\on Rts$urce 1987 <;-::r I 2~~521 $1; CLn~'lu'SfrCcf 1987 Phli~I~Ip~bi,'1 13107 Distribution of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Tributaries and Chincoteague Bay - 1987 Robert J. Orth, Adam A. Fri sch, Judith F. Nowak, and Kenneth A. Moore Virginia Institute of Marine Science School of Marine Science College of Will iam and Mary Gloucester Point, VA 23062 Contributions by: Nancy Rybicki U.S. Environmental Protection Agenq R.T. Anderson Region 111 Information Resource Virginia Carter Center (3PM52) U. S . Geol ogi cal Survey 841 Che~inutStreet Reston, VA 22092 Philadelphia, PA 19107 Funded by: Mary1 and Department of Natural Resources Virginia Institute of Marine Science U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Environmental Protection Agency All ied-Signal Inc. National Oceanographic Atmospheric Administration Final Report Submitted to: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Annapolis, MD 21403 April, 1989 Cover Photo: Aerial photograph of the Potomac River south of Washington D.C., shot at 12,000 feet by AEROECO Inc., Edgewater, MD. CONTENTS Paqe Tables .............................................................. iv Figures ............................................................. Executive Summary ..................................................
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    The Southern Algonquians and Their Neighbours DAVID H. PENTLAND University of Manitoba INTRODUCTION At least fifty named Indian groups are known to have lived in the area south of the Mason-Dixon line and north of the Creek and the other Muskogean tribes. The exact number and the specific names vary from one source to another, but all agree that there were many different tribes in Maryland, Virginia and the Carolinas during the colonial period. Most also agree that these fifty or more tribes all spoke languages that can be assigned to just three language families: Algonquian, Iroquoian, and Siouan. In the case of a few favoured groups there is little room for debate. It is certain that the Powhatan spoke an Algonquian language, that the Tuscarora and Cherokee are Iroquoians, and that the Catawba speak a Siouan language. In other cases the linguistic material cannot be positively linked to one particular political group. There are several vocabularies of an Algonquian language that are labelled Nanticoke, but Ives Goddard (1978:73) has pointed out that Murray collected his "Nanticoke" vocabulary at the Choptank village on the Eastern Shore, and Heckeweld- er's vocabularies were collected from refugees living in Ontario. Should the language be called Nanticoke, Choptank, or something else? And if it is Nanticoke, did the Choptank speak the same language, a different dialect, a different Algonquian language, or some completely unrelated language? The basic problem, of course, is the lack of reliable linguistic data from most of this region. But there are additional complications. It is known that some Indians were bilingual or multilingual (cf.
  • Quality Assurance Project Plan

    Quality Assurance Project Plan

    Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program for the period July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020 1 July, 2019 DRAFT Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program for the period July 1, 2019 – June 30, 2020 Prepared by: Tom Parham, Mark Trice, Brian Smith, Diana Domotor, and Ben Cole Resource Assessment Service/Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment Maryland Department of Natural Resources Tawes Building, D-2 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, MD 21401 Website Address: http://dnr.maryland.gov Toll Free in Maryland: 1-877-620-8DNR, ext: 8630 Out of state call: 410-260-8630 TTY users call via the MD Relay: 711 (within MD) Out of state call: 1-800-735-2258 © 2019 Maryland Department of Natural Resources The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, national origin or physical or mental disability. This document is available in alternative format upon request from a qualified individual. Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor Printed on Recycled Paper Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources Chesapeake Bay Shallow Water Quality Monitoring Program for the period July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020 1 July, 2019 _______________________________ Thomas Parham, Principal Investigator Director, Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment Division
  • SAC Briefing

    SAC Briefing

    Mallows Bay-Potomac River National Marine Sanctuary https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/mallows-potomac Sammy Orlando NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries c/o NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Annapolis MD Mallows Bay-Potomac River NMS Sanctuary Co-Management Maritime and Cultural Heritage Recreation, Tourism, Economic Development Photo: Matt McIntosh Natural Resource Management Photo: Matt McIntosh Grounded Fleet Mallows Bay, 1925 (National Archives) Mallows Bay-Potomac River Photo: Cyrus E. Phillips 9/20/16 photo by Marine Robotics & Remote Sensing, Duke University Habitat Structure for Fish and Wildlife Photo: Daryl Byrd Photo: Kim Hernandez Photo: Eric Packard Photo: Kevin Thomas Photo: Paula Schiller Local and Regional Commercial Tours Atlantic Kayak, REI, Potomac Riverkeeper New Interpretative Water Trails! Site Characterization: Science, Monitoring, and Technologies Photo: Terrain360 9/20/16 photo by Marine Robotics & Remote Sensing, Duke University Credit: Chessapeake Conservancy / National Marine Sanctuary Foundation Science, Monitoring and Technologies: New Water Quality Buoy! Science, Monitoring and Technologies: New Water Quality Monitoring – Citizen Science Living Laboratories: Science, Education, and Career Opportunities Strengthening Educational Opportunities: Advanced Technologies and Career Opportunities NOAA Deputy Administrator, RDML Timothy Gallaudet Community Engagement: Annual Trash Clean Up at Mallows Bay Park Virtual Reality Tour Showcasing Federal – State – County – Community Partnerships CREDIT: Jim Toomey Infrastructure
  • Directory of County Officials 2019-2020 WE’VE GOT GREAT ENERGY

    Directory of County Officials 2019-2020 WE’VE GOT GREAT ENERGY

    Maryland Association of Counties Maryland Association of Counties Directory of County Officials 2019-2020 WE’VE GOT GREAT ENERGY. For over 20 years, we’ve been providing competitive electricity and natural gas supply, renewable energy and carbon offsets to state and local governments across the Mid-Atlantic. ENERGY FOR YOUR HOME OR BUSINESS WGLEnergy.com COLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGECOLLEGE OF OF OF OF OFOF PUBLICOF OFPUBLICPUBLIC PUBLICPUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC AFFAIRS AFFAIRS AFFAIRSAFFAIRSAFFAIRS AFFAIRSAFFAIRS AFFAIRSAFFAIRS SCHAEFERSCHAEFERSCHAEFERSCHAEFERSCHAEFERSCHAEFER CENTER CENTER CENTERCENTER CENTERCENTER FOR FOR FORFOR FORPUBLICFOR PUBLIC PUBLICPUBLIC PUBLICPUBLIC POLICY POLICY POLICYPOLICY POLICY POLICY GRADUATE GRADUATEGRADUATEGRADUATEGRADUATE PROGRAMS PROGRAMS PROGRAMS PROGRAMS PROGRAMS SCHAEFERApSCHAEFERApplipeldie dRe Research searchCENTER CENTER & &Consulting Consulting FOR FOR PUBLIC PUBLIC POLICY POLICY GraduateGraduateGRADUATEGRADUATE Programs Programs PROGRAMS thatPROGRAMS that Prepare Prepare SCHAEFERApAppApApplileipepdldil ei ReedRed searchResearchRe searchCENTERsearch && Consulting& Consulting& Consulting Consulting FOR PUBLIC POLICY GraduateGraduateGraduateGRADUATE Programs Programs Programs PROGRAMS that that that Prepare Prepare Prepare ApServicesAppServiceslpielide dRe forRe searchfor searchGovernment Government & &Consulting Consulting StudentsStudentsGraduateGraduate to to Lead LeadPrograms Programs In: In: that that Prepare Prepare ApServicesServicespServiceslServicesied Re forforsearch
  • Occupation Polygons

    Occupation Polygons

    Polygon Date & Period Archaeological Phase Cultural - Historical Source & Comment Hist or Arch Pop & Sites Group Estimate 1 early 16th century Little Tennessee site 16th century Chiaha mid-16th century, Little Tennessee site cluster cluster and sites 7-19 and sites 7-19, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Chiaha, three populations, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Little Tennessee cluster plus additional sites, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 2 early 16th century Hiwassee site cluster mid-16th century, Hiwassee site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Hiwassee cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 3 early 16th century Chattanooga site cluster 16th century Napochies mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Hally et al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; 16th century Napochies, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Chattanooga site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 4 early 16th century Carters site cluster; 16th century Coosa mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Hally et al. X Barnett phase 1990:Fig. 9.1; Barnett phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century Coosa, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Carters site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 5 early 16th century Cartersville site cluster; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Hally et Brewster phase al. 1990:Fig. 9.1; Brewster phase, Hally and Rudolph 1986:Fig. 15; 16th century, Smith 1989:Fig. 1; mid-16th century, Cartersville site cluster, Smith, 2000:Fig. 18 6 early 16th century Rome site cluster; 16th century Apica mid-16th century, Rome site cluster, Hally et al.
  • Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Connecting

    Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail Connecting

    CAPTAIN JOHN SMITH CHESAPEAKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL CONNECTING TRAILS EVALUATION STUDY 410 Severn Avenue, Suite 405 Annapolis, MD 21403 CONTENTS Acknowledgments 2 Executive Summary 3 Statement of Study Findings 5 Introduction 9 Research Team Reports 10 Anacostia River 11 Chester River 15 Choptank River 19 Susquehanna River 23 Upper James River 27 Upper Nanticoke River 30 Appendix: Research Teams’ Executive Summaries and Bibliographies 34 Anacostia River 34 Chester River 37 Choptank River 40 Susquehanna River 44 Upper James River 54 Upper Nanticoke River 56 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are truly thankful to the research and project team, led by John S. Salmon, for the months of dedicated research, mapping, and analysis that led to the production of this important study. In all, more than 35 pro- fessionals, including professors and students representing six universities, American Indian representatives, consultants, public agency representatives, and community leaders contributed to this report. Each person brought an extraordinary depth of knowledge, keen insight and a personal devotion to the project. We are especially grateful for the generous financial support that we received from the following private foundations, organizations and corporate partners: The Morris & Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation, The Clay- ton Fund, Inc., Colcom Foundation, The Conservation Fund, Lockheed Martin, the Richard King Mellon Foundation, The Merrill Foundation, the Pennsylvania Environmental Council, the Rauch Foundation, The Peter Jay Sharp Foundation, Verizon, Virginia Environmental Endowment and the Wallace Genetic Foundation. Without their support this project would simply not have been possible. Finally, we would like to extend a special thank you to the board of directors of the Chesapeake Conser- vancy, and to John Maounis, Superintendent of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Office, for their leadership and unwavering commitment to the Captain John Smith Chesapeake Trail.
  • The Potomac Above the Falls — Archeological Identification And

    The Potomac Above the Falls — Archeological Identification And

    COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF C&O CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) Volume I PREPARED FOR: NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 1100 OHIO DRIVE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 Final Report COHONGOROOTO: THE POTOMAC ABOVE THE FALLS ARCHEOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND EVALUATION STUDY OF CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ROCK CREEK TO SANDY HOOK (MILE MARKERS 0 TO 59) VOLUME I Final Report PREPARED FOR: National Capital Region National Park Service 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20242 PREPARED BY: Stuart Fiedel, John Bedell, Charles LeeDecker THE LOUIS BERGER GROUP, INC. 2300 N Street NW Washington, D.C. 20037 December 2005 FOREWORD This is the first of three volumes reporting the results of a three-year archeological survey of the easternmost 59 miles of the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park (C&O Canal Park) for the National Park Service (NPS), National Capital Region, from 2003 through 2005. In recognition of the paucity of basic archeological data for the C&O Canal Park, and for other NPS properties in the National Capital Region, funds were devoted to implement the Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program (SAIP) in this area. The SAIP was developed to address the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act (specifically Sections 106 and 110), Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological Resources Protection Act. The rationale for the archeological survey was based primarily on the NPS’s resource management needs under Section 110 rather than being driven by development or capital improvement projects within the park.
  • Indian Peoples, Nations and Violence in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake

    Indian Peoples, Nations and Violence in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake

    CERTAINE BOUNDES: INDIAN PEOPLES, NATIONS AND VIOLENCE IN THE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY CHESAPEAKE By JESSICA TAYLOR A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Jessica Taylor To Mimi, you are worth so much ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my advisor, Juliana Barr, for her thoughtful and sincere support. I am so glad to have her in my life. My committee members Marty Hylton, Jon Sensbach, Elizabeth Dale, and Paul Ortiz each offered different paths to new thoughts and perspectives. My co-workers, students, and friends at the Samuel Proctor Oral History Program helped me gain the confidence to pursue new ideas and goals. I thank all of the wonderful people who have read drafts of chapters and talked ideas through with me including Jeffrey Flanagan, Matt Saionz, Johanna Mellis, Rebecca Lowe, David Shope, Roberta Taylor, Robert Taber, David Brown, Elyssa Hamm. Thank you to Eleanor Deumens for editing my footnotes and offering wonderful suggestions. I thank the Virginia Historical Society, the Virginia Foundation for the Humanities, and the Mary and David Harrison Institute for American History, Literature, and Culture for their financial support of my research for this project. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................
  • Chesapeake's First National Marine Sanctuary

    Chesapeake's First National Marine Sanctuary

    CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY 2019 WINTER NEWSLETTER ShorelinesSaving the Chesapeake’s Great Rivers and Special Places Chesapeake’s First National Marine Sanctuary PHOTO BY DARYL BYRD/MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES COVER STORY PAGE 4 New National Park Service Superintendent 3 Conowingo Dam Partnership 6 Conservation Innovation Center Hires AI Scientist 6 From the President & CEO Mission Pursuing Big Ideas The Chesapeake Conservancy’s mission is to conserve Humanity’s greatest ideas begin with and restore the natural and cultural resources of the tough questions that defy conventional Chesapeake Bay watershed for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. We serve as thinking. “What if we could circumnavigate a catalyst for change, advancing strong public and private the world?” “What if we could reach the partnerships, developing and using new technology, and stars?” Some great ideas begin with a empowering environmental stewardship. simple question: “What if we could do Board of Directors things differently?” These ideas inspire; they invite skepticism; they unleash a Anne W. Scott, Chair flurry of ensuing questions; but when Robert Gensler, Treasurer pursued, they reshape our world and Molly Joseph Ward, Secretary Mark Belton expand the very confines of our reality. Thad Bench Marc Bunting At Chesapeake Conservancy, we constantly Leslie Delagran grapple with big ideas and challenging Chesapeake Conservancy President & CEO Joel Dunn PHOTO BY MARK HAMILTON Joel E. Dunn questions. Even as we applaud the successes Robert E. Friend Heather Gartman in land conservation described in the So we ask, “What if we could have a Verna Harrison recent Marking Milestones report from the national park for the Chesapeake Bay?” Randall W.
  • Mallows Bay-Potomac River

    Mallows Bay-Potomac River

    “We believe that this designation will serve Stephen Badger Paula Schiller Kimberly Hernandez as a tremendous Mallows Bay-Potomac River opportunity to National Marine Sanctuary Nomination promote Maryland’s Located on the Potomac River just 30 miles from our nation’s capital, Mallows Bay is renowned for world-class its diverse collection of historic shipwrecks, recreational opportunities and scenic beauty. Through a community-based effort, this Maryland treasure in Charles County may become the first national recreational fishing, marine sanctuary in the state of Maryland and the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and the first new designation in more than two decades. boating and tourism, and advance our efforts to protect Mallows Bay is and restore the located along the tidal Lower Potomac River Chesapeake Bay off the Nanjemoy Peninsula of Charles County, watershed while Maryland. educating the public about our nation’s Protecting the “Ghost Fleet” of Mallows Bay Mallows Bay is situated south of Washington, D.C., along the tidal Lower Potomac River off maritime and cultural the Nanjemoy Peninsula of Charles County, Maryland. This shallow embayment, and the waters immediately adjacent, boasts one of the largest assemblages of shipwrecks in the history.” Western Hemisphere, known as the “Ghost Fleet” of Mallows Bay. This diverse collection of historic shipwrecks totals nearly 200 known vessels dating back to the Revolutionary War and World War I. Mark Belton Natural Resources In addition to the “Ghost Fleet,” archaeological artifacts discovered around Mallows Bay Secretary date back 12,000 years, indicating the presence of some of the region’s earliest Native American cultures. The area is contiguous to the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail, the Star Spangled Banner National Historic Trail, the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail and the Lower Potomac Water Trail, which offers many educational and recreational opportunities.
  • Dedication of Mallows Bay-Potomac River National Marine Sanctuary

    Dedication of Mallows Bay-Potomac River National Marine Sanctuary

    mallows bay-potomac river national marine sanctuary Dedication of mallows bay-potomac river national marine sanctuary November 9, 2019 Mallows Bay Park Nanjemoy, Maryland photo: Duke Marine Robotics & Remote Sensing Presented by NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries together with the state of Maryland and Charles County, Maryland. allows Bay-Potomac River National Marine Sanctuary, the first national marine sanctuary designated since 2000, encompasses M18 square miles of waters and submerged lands within the tidal Potomac River, in Maryland state waters. The sanctuary protects nationally-significant maritime cultural heritage resources, including the historic remains of World War I era wooden steamships known as the “Ghost Fleet.” The sanctuary also includes Native American sites, remains of historic fisheries operations, and Revolutionary and Civil War battlescapes. he Ghost Fleet ships were built as part of the country’s engagement in World War I. Although the ships never saw action, their construction at more than 40 shipyards in 17 states reflected the massive national Twartime effort that drove expansion and economic development in many communities. Today, nature has reclaimed the ships, and the overgrown wrecks provide habitat for fish, beaver, and a variety of birds including osprey, bald eagles, and blue heron. photo: Duke Marine Robotics & Remote Sensing Program Presentation of Colors AEGIS Training and Readiness Center Color Guard ProgramNational Anthem Neci Jordan, Charles County, Maryland Welcome Sammy Orlando, Chesapeake Bay Regional Coordinator, NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries Tribal Blessing Mario Harley, Vice Chair, Piscataway Conoy Tribe Remarks Donald G. Shomette, Historian/Author of “The Ghost Fleet of Mallows Bay” The Honorable Lawrence J.