DOCSLIB.ORG

1 CHESHIRE EAST BC – LOCAL PLAN HEARINGS Supplementary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 CHESHIRE EAST BC – LOCAL PLAN HEARINGS Supplementary CHESHIRE EAST BC – LOCAL PLAN HEARINGS Supplementary Comments from Congleton Sustainability Group Matter 14.5 – SL6, SL7, CS16, SL8, CS17 – Congleton NOTE: Many of the issues raised in these supplementary comments also apply to many, if not all, other Key Service Centres identified in the Plan. Key Issue The Congleton Sustainability Group was formed to address local climate change issues and in particular, to reduce the carbon emissions of the town. To this end we gained Transition Town status for Congleton in 2011 and have delivered a number of notable projects. While fully agreeing with Plan’s vision of reducing carbon emissions, we consider the Plan will not achieve this, particularly with its proposals for Congleton. However, we believe that the Plan can be modified to address some of the unsustainable elements, particularly the very high levels of commuting (both in and out) at Congleton (and at other Key Service Centres). We believe that it is not sufficient simply to aim to reduce the carbon emissions for the Borough as a whole by measures such as the ground source heating proposals (which we very much welcome) but the Plan must be predicated on reducing the carbon emissions for each community and each development within those communities. To this end each community must be as self-contained as possible, not only in terms of services but in terms of all aspects of daily living particularly employment. This requires innovative, aspirational but realistically deliverable measures to reduce carbon emissions at every community and development. We feel this is missing from the Plan as currently drafted, but consider this can be addressed by relatively minor modifications to the Plan. Additional Comments on Spatial Portrait (paras 2.51 – 2.53) Congleton is reasonably self-contained in terms of services (retail, schools, leisure etc.). However, retail only provides for basic daily needs. The proposed retail development in the town centre and a possible lifestyle centre (to replace or supplement the existing sports centre) will, in our opinion, simply provide for the increase in demand for basic daily needs created by the planned development (3500 dwellings). Comparative shopping will still be very limited with existing and new residents continuing to look to Macclesfield (closest) or further afield to Crewe, Stoke-on-Trent/Hanley etc. The key issue with Congleton and most, if not all, Key Service Centres is that it woefully fails to be self-contained in terms of employment with high levels of both out-commuting and in-commuting. Currently about 2/3 of workers commute out with about 1/3 travelling to nearby towns (Crewe Macclesfield) and 1/3 commuting travelling greater distances to Manchester and further afield – we have evidence of commuting as far as Birmingham, Leicester etc.. 1 Congleton is historically a manufacturing town and although there has been a marked reduction in manufacturing in the town, Class B type employment (including manufacturing) still represents the vast majority of businesses in the town. Background In 1947 the population of Congleton was around 14,000; there was a wide range of employment available, the vast majority being in manufacturing (textiles represented the majority but there were a wide range of other goods manufactured). The Co-op was a major employer and provider of retail and services i.e. the town was substantially self-contained. In the intervening years there has been a very significant increase in housing, principally to the north, south and west of the town such that now the population is in the order of 26,000. Rather than employment opportunities keeping pace with the increased population there has been a significant reduction in employment opportunities, principally resulting from a reduction in manufacturing. New manufacturing businesses have started up or come to the town but this has not addressed the overall reduction in employment opportunities. The key thing to note here is that the clear evidence from past experience is that simply building more houses has not resulted in more employment in the town on the contrary; the significant increase in housing has singularly failed to halt the reduction in employment opportunities. While accepting and welcoming, albeit (in our opinion) the allocation of limited employment sites we are very concerned that simply building more houses will simply exacerbate the existing problems of high levels of out and in commuting with the twin knock-on effects of increased congestion (which adversely affects the economy of the Borough) and increased carbon emissions. The Local Plan must contain robust and workable solutions to expand employment at Congleton to begin to address the gross imbalance between the size of the town and the low levels and relatively poor quality of employment. There is a vicious circle whereby workers commute out of Congleton to the higher paid jobs (that match their skills and education) which enable them to afford the relatively higher cost of market housing in the town which in turn keeps the house prices high. While the existing employment market is comparatively poor, offering mainly low paid and/or part-time jobs to workers who cannot afford to live in Congleton and therefore commute in from more affordable areas of north Staffordshire, principally Biddulph, which is only 4 miles from Congleton. The Local Plan The following are the key issues we wish to raise in relation to Congleton in the Local Plan: We recognise that the Plan needs to be aspirational but also realistic, so while we would like to see a very significant reduction in both in and out commuting this is perhaps not realistic. We would however want the Plan to aim to reduce the level of out-commuting to below 50% and preferably nearer to 40%. 2 To achieve this, the Plan needs deliver a meaningful reduction in commuting by ensuring there is a wide range of jobs to match the full range of skills and education attainment available at Congleton and each town in the Borough. This will be a significant step towards achieving sustainable development and will result in benefits to both the economy of the Borough and to the wellbeing and quality of life for its residents, both existing and new. We are not convinced that the 24ha identified in the Plan is sufficient to provide the required number of jobs to enable Congleton to become far more self-contained. Key points are: We know of a number of businesses in Congleton desperate to expand on their current site and are currently unable to do so; they are not interested in relocating. While the number of homeworking jobs including sole trader businesses is increasing there is a finite number of these, i.e. not everyone will be able to work from home. Manufacturing is and will remain a key staple of the UK’s economy; manufacturing in Congleton and elsewhere in the Borough will need to play its part in this. With existing technology based businesses in Congleton (electronics, aerospace etc.) there is a case for further technology based business, particularly green technology. We are concerned that not only does Cheshire East have to compete with adjoining authority areas to attract employment (most notably with Manchester), the various towns within Cheshire East need to compete with each other to attract employment and we are concerned that while employment land has been identified for Congleton, Cheshire East BC are looking to promote Crewe and Macclesfield first. We believe this is not good for the sustainability and self-containment of Congleton and the other Key Service Centres. There is a very serious and likely risk that the Plan as currently drafted will simply result in even higher levels of commuting from the likes of Congleton to Crewe and Macclesfield. This will be bad not only for the likes of Congleton but for the Borough as a whole as levels of congestion increase significantly which is bad for the economy of the Borough and also bad for those forced to commute and whose quality of life will be degraded by stressful and ever increasing commuting journey times. If there is to be the level of development at Congleton as currently envisaged in the Plan we are content with the sites identified for Congleton in the Plan. The main reasons for this are: While we wish to see a significant reduction in out-commuting, as recognised above, there will always be workers who will commute and the most likely destination for this traffic is Crewe, Macclesfield and beyond (including Manchester). Commuters from this new development will be able to access these and other locations without having to pass through the town centre, nor indeed, with the Link Road, adjacent existing residential areas. The housing development will be adjacent to the existing and expanded employment sites and the existing Park Barn Retail Park consequently, with proper planning these would be accessible by sustainable, i.e. non car-based, modes. 3 The proposed Link Road is needed to give access to all this new development, particularly, all HGV traffic to the existing and expanded business and industrial parks will be re-directed via the Link Road and so remove these vehicles from the existing local road network, particularly, Back Lane which is unsuitable for HGVs. Having given our support to both the location of development and the Link Road there are a number of issues and caveats we wish to raise, as follows: The description of each of the development sites includes for the provision of local services, public transport, green travel etc. which we welcome, but no details are given at this stage. However, all the sites adjoin each other and the existing built-up area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 13/2136C Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-On
    Application No: 13/2136C Location: Rectory Farm, Knutsford Road, Church Lawton, Stoke-on-Trent, ST7 3EQ Proposal: Outline application for demolition of house, garage, barns and outbuildings, removal of hardstanding and construction of housing development Applicant: Northwest Heritage Expiry Date: 27-Aug-2013 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve with conditions MAIN ISSUES • Principle of Development • Sustainability • Character and Appearance • Landscape Impact • Ecology • Highway Safety and Traffic Generation. • Affordable Housing • Drainage and Flooding • Open Space • Residential Amenity • Other Considerations REFERRAL The application has been referred to the Southern Planning Committee because the site area is just over 0.5 hectares in size and is therefore a small scale major development. 1. SITE DESCRIPTION This application relates to the former Rectory Farm situated to the northwest of Church Lawton and to the east of the Town of Alsager. The site lies wholly within the Infill Boundary Line for Lawton Gate, which is a small settlement washed over by Green Belt. The site accommodates the main rectory farm dormer bungalow, a detached dormer ancillary outbuilding and some detached barns / stables towards. To the north and the east, the site is bound by field and paddocks. Beyond the northern boundary of the site, the levels drop away significantly where the curtilage of Rectory Farm ceases. The land slopes downwards towards a brook beyond which there is the Trent and Mersey Canal which occupies an elevated position relative to the northern end of the site. The site can be viewed from the adjacent canal towpath. There are residential properties further to the east and residential properties bounding the southern boundary of the site which form part of the Lawton Gate settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough Profile 2020 Warrington
    Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire and Warrington
    Children and Young People Health and Wellbeing Profile: Cheshire and Warrington Public Health Institute, Faculty of Education, Health and Community, Liverpool John Moores University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster Street, Liverpool, L3 2ET | 0151 231 4452 | [email protected] | www.cph.org.uk | ISBN: 978-1-910725-80-1 (web) Contents Acknowledgements 1 Introduction 2 Child to young person life course infographic 3 1 Children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington 4 2 Pre-birth and early years 5 3 Primary school 6 4 Secondary school to young adults 7 Interpretation guide 9 Data sources 9 Acknowledgements The Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University was commissioned to undertake this work by the Cheshire and Merseyside Directors of Public Health through the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health Intelligence Network and Champs Public Health Collaborative (Cheshire and Merseyside). It was developed in collaboration with Melisa Campbell, Research Fellow in Public Health, University of Liverpool. For more information & data sources please contact: Janet Ubido, Champs Researcher, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University. Email: [email protected] 1 Foreword The health and wellbeing of children and young people in our region is a key public health priority. This report presents profiles for children and young people in Cheshire and Warrington to help identify the actions that can support and improve outcomes for this population. The profiles cover a wide range of indicators which all impact upon health and social wellbeing. The first 1000 days from conception and the early years are key stages which impact on children’s health, readiness to grow, learn and succeed.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadside Hedge and Tree Maintenance Programme
    Roadside hedge and tree maintenance programme The programme for Cheshire East Higways’ hedge cutting in 2013/14 is shown below. It is due to commence in mid-October and scheduled for approximately 4 weeks. Two teams operating at the same time will cover the 30km and 162 sites Team 1 Team 2 Congleton LAP Knutsford LAP Crewe LAP Wilmslow LAP Nantwich LAP Poynton LAP Macclesfield LAP within the Cheshire East area in the following order:- LAP = Local Area Partnership. A map can be viewed: http://www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/PDF/laps-wards-a3[2].pdf The 2013 Hedge Inventory is as follows: 1 2013 HEDGE INVENTORY CHESHIRE EAST HIGHWAYS LAP 2 Peel Lne/Peel drive rhs of jct. Astbury Congleton 3 Alexandra Rd./Booth Lane Middlewich each side link FW Congleton 4 Astbury St./Banky Fields P.R.W Congleton Congleton 5 Audley Rd./Barley Croft Alsager between 81/83 Congleton 6 Bradwall Rd./Twemlow Avenue Sandbach link FW Congleton 7 Centurian Way Verges Middlewich Congleton 8 Chatsworth Dr. (Springfield Dr.) Congleton Congleton 9 Clayton By-Pass from River Dane to Barn Rd RA Congleton Congleton Clayton By-Pass From Barn Rd RA to traffic lights Rood Hill 10 Congleton Congleton 11 Clayton By-Pass from Barn Rd RA to traffic lights Rood Hill on Congleton Tescos side 12 Cockshuts from Silver St/Canal St towards St Peters Congleton Congleton Cookesmere Lane Sandbach 375199,361652 Swallow Dv to 13 Congleton Dove Cl 14 Coronation Crescent/Mill Hill Lane Sandbach link path Congleton 15 Dale Place on lhs travelling down 386982,362894 Congleton Congleton Dane Close/Cranberry Moss between 20 & 34 link path 16 Congleton Congleton 17 Edinburgh Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire & Warrington
    Access to the countryside without the car One issue to which the Forum has not given much attention hitherto is ensuring that the Cheshire countryside is accessible to all residents and visitors irrespective of their means of travel. With increasing attention rightly being given to climate change and the need to cut greenhouse gas emissions, the need for people to be able to reach the countryside easily in a more sustainable way CHESHIRE & than by car perhaps merits being placed higher up the Forum’s agenda. The Forum has a duty to improve public access, and this should extend equally to those who are socially excluded, or who WARRINGTON suffer disability, or who for various reasons either cannot or do not drive a car, as well as car owners who might decide not to drive if The Forum might equally lobby for the introduction of new they are made aware of the other options available. multi-modal tickets, along the lines of the one-time Sunday LOCAL ACCESS FORUM Adventurer Ticket which was valid on buses throughout Cheshire, The two new unitary authorities are responsible for co-ordinating or for the extension of the area of validity of some existing leisure public transport, thus relevant aspects the Forum might press for tickets such as the Wayfarer Ticket, which for almost 30 years has the Councils to consider could include the existence and viability provided a cheap and flexible means of access by bus and rail to of local bus services which provide access to key countryside sites the northern part of the Forum’s area.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Overview and Scrutiny Functions at Similarly Sized Unitary Authorities
    Appendix B (4) – Comparison of overview and scrutiny functions at similarly sized unitary authorities No. of Resident Authority elected Committees Committee membership population councillors Children and Families OSC 12 members + 2 co-optees Corporate OSC 12 members Cheshire East Council 378,800 82 Environment and Regeneration OSC 12 members Health and Adult Social Care and Communities 15 members OSC Children and Families OSC 15 members, 2 co-optees Customer and Support Services OSC 15 members Cornwall Council 561,300 123 Economic Growth and Development OSC 15 members Health and Adult Social Care OSC 15 members Neighbourhoods OSC 15 members Adults, Wellbeing and Health OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees 21 members, 4 church reps, 3 school governor reps, 2 co- Children and Young People's OSC optees Corporate Overview and Scrutiny Management Durham County Council 523,000 126 Board 26 members, 4 faith reps, 3 parent governor reps Economy and Enterprise OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees Environment and Sustainable Communities OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees Safeter and Stronger Communities OSC 21 members, 2 co-optees Children's Select Committee 13 members Environment Select Committee 13 members Wiltshere Council 496,000 98 Health Select Committee 13 members Overview and Scrutiny Management Committee 15 members Adults, Children and Education Scrutiny Commission 11 members Communities Scrutiny Commission 11 members Bristol City Council 459,300 70 Growth and Regeneration Scrutiny Commission 11 members Overview and Scrutiny Management Board 11 members Resources
    [Show full text]
  • The Congleton Accounts: Further Evidence of Elizabethan and Jacobean Drama in Cheshire
    ALAN C . COMAN The Congleton accounts: further evidence of Elizabethan and Jacobean drama in Cheshire Last summer, while conducting my research into the influence on Elizabethan and Jacobean drama of schoolmasters and household tutors in the northwest of England - viz, Cheshire, Lancashire, Shropshire (Salop) and Westmorland (Cumbria) - I came across some evidence of dramatic activities in Congleton that I believe are as yet undocumented but are significant in several respects . Since it was a chance discovery right at the end of my stay, what is presented here is only a cursory examination of the records, not a thorough and complete study . In the Cheshire County Record Office, I had occasion to consult Robert Head's Congleton Past and Present, published in 1887 and republished presumably as a centenary tribute in 1987, and History of Congleton, edited by W .B. Stephens and published in 1970 to celebrate the 700th anniversary of the town's royal charter.' Although my immediate concern was with the history of Congleton Grammar School and any possible dramatic activity connected with it, I was struck by references to the town's notorious week-long cockfights and bearbaits, and the even more intriguing assertions that the cockpit was usually in the school and that the schoolmaster was the controller and director of the pastime, reclaiming all runaway cocks as his own rightful perquisites . Head's book gave an entry from the borough's accounts : `1601. Payd John Wagge for dressyige the schoolhouse at the great cock fyghte . ..0.0.4d'. Because the aforementioned sports and pastimes were said to have drawn all the local gentry and nobility to the schoolhouse, the schoolmaster might also have undertaken some dramatic activities ; the town could have attracted touring companies at such times .
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire East – Area Profile (Spring 2015)
    Appendix 1 Cheshire East – Area Profile (spring 2015) Introduction Cheshire East is the third biggest unitary authority in the North West and the thirteenth largest in the country. It therefore has a wide breadth of social grades, age profiles and ranges of affluence. There is a clear link between these measures and the likelihood of a person gambling. It also needs to be acknowledged that there are clear differences between the type of person who gambles responsibly and the type who is identified as a problem gambler. This profile with therefore concentrate on the on the measures that can contribute to gambling and problem gambling. People Cheshire East an estimated population of 372,7001, the population density is 3.2 residents per hectare2, making Cheshire East less densely populated than the North West (5.0 per hectare) and England (4.1 per hectare). Between the 2001 and 2011 Census, the median age of residents has increased from 40.6 years to 43.6 years3. Between the same years, the number of over 65s has increased by 11,700 residents or 26%, which is a greater increase than the North West (15%) and England & Wales (20%). 1 2013 Mid-year population estimates, Office for National Statistics, NOMIS, Crown Copyright 2 2011 Mid-year population estimates and UK Standard Area Measurements (SAM) 2011, Office for National Statistics, Crown Copyright 3 2001 and 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics, Crown Copyright From 2011 to 2021 the population is expected to increase by 15,700 people (4.2%) to 385,800, a greater increase than the North West (3.7%) but less than England (7.5%)4.
    [Show full text]
  • Claimant Unemployment Data
    claimant count with rates and proportions ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 17 April 2013] sex Total item name Total claimants rate Proportion of resident population aged 16-64 estimates Area March 2012 February 2013 March 2013 number rate number rate number rate uacounty09:Cheshire East 6,060 2.6 5,905 2.5 5,883 2.5 gor:North West 209,366 4.6 201,607 4.4 198,096 4.4 country:United Kingdom 1,666,859 4.1 1,613,789 3.9 1,584,468 3.9 Rates for local authorities from 2011 onwards are calculated using the mid-2011 resident population aged 16-64. Rates for regions and countries from 2011 onwards are calculated using the mid-2011 resident population aged 16-64. JSA count in Population (from LSOA01CD LSOA11CD LSOA11NM CHGIND March 2013 2011 Census) Claimant rate Settlement E01018574 E01018574 Cheshire East 012C U 23 1250 1.8 Alderley Edge E01018572 E01018572 Cheshire East 012A U 7 958 0.7 Alderley Edge E01018573 E01018573 Cheshire East 012B U 6 918 0.7 Alderley Edge E01018388 E01018388 Cheshire East 040B U 70 1008 6.9 Alsager E01018391 E01018391 Cheshire East 042B U 22 1205 1.8 Alsager E01018389 E01018389 Cheshire East 040C U 16 934 1.7 Alsager E01018392 E01018392 Cheshire East 042C U 19 1242 1.5 Alsager E01018390 E01018390 Cheshire East 040D U 12 955 1.3 Alsager E01018386 E01018386 Cheshire East 042A U 8 797 1.0 Alsager E01018387 E01018387 Cheshire East 040A U 8 938 0.9 Alsager E01018450 E01018450 Cheshire East 051B U 15 1338 1.1 Audlem E01018449 E01018449 Cheshire East 051A U 10 1005 1.0 Audlem E01018579 E01018579 Cheshire East 013E
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Full List of Recycle Bank Sites and Materials Collected
    Appendix 1: Full List of Recycle Bank Sites and Materials Collected MATERIALS RECYCLED Council Site Address Paper Glass Plastic Cans Textiles Shoes Books Oil WEEE Owned Civic Car Park Sandbach Road, Alsager Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No No Fanny's Croft Car Park Audley Road, Alsager Yes No No No No Yes Yes No No No Manor House Hotel Audley Road, Alsager Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Alsager Household Waste Hassall Road Household Waste Recycling Centre, Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Recycling Centre Hassall Road, Alsager, ST7 2SJ Bridge Inn Shropshire Street, Audlem, CW3 0DX Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Cheshire Street Car Park Cheshire Street, Audlem, CW3 0AH Yes No No No No No Yes No Yes No Lord Combermere The Square, Audlem, CW3 0AQ No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No (Pub/Restaurant) Shroppie Fly (Pub) The Wharf, Shropshire Street, Audlem, CW3 0DX No Yes No No Yes No No No Yes No Bollington Household Waste Albert Road, Bollington, SK10 5HW Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recycling Centre Pool Bank Car Park Palmerston Street, Bollington, SK10 5PX Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Boars Leigh Hotel Leek Road, Bosley, SK11 0PN No Yes No No No No No No Yes No Bosley St Mary's County Leek Road, Bosley, SK11 0NX Yes No No No No No No No Yes No Primary School West Street Car Park West Street, Congleton, CW12 1JR Yes No No No No Yes Yes No Yes No West Heath Shopping Centre Holmes Chapel Road, Congleton, CW12 4NB No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No No Tesco, Barn Road Barn Road, Congleton, CW12 1LR No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No No Appendix 1: Full List of Recycle Bank Sites and Materials Collected MATERIALS RECYCLED Council Site Address Paper Glass Plastic Cans Textiles Shoes Books Oil WEEE Owned Late Shop, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Dtoc Nov-17
    Lancashire DToC Nov-17 Delayed Transfers of Care (DToC) Analysis Lancashire DToC Nov-17 v02 Data Sources Used in this Report DToC All figures relating to the number of delayed days or the number of DToC bed days have been taken from the CSV Format Monthly Delayed Transfers of Care files as published on the NHS website on the second Thursday of each month at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/delayed-transfers-of- care/ Population Rates per 100,000 population for each local authority use the appropriate mid-year estimates for the population aged 18+ as produced by the Office for National Statistics each year. Version Control Document name: Lancashire DToC Nov-17 Version: 02 Date: 12 January 2018 Document control / revision history Version Revision date Summary of changes 01 11/01/2018 02 12/01/2018 Addition of data sources note on page 1 Andrew MacLeod Performance Officer Business Intelligence Lancashire County Council For further information on the work of Business Intelligence, please contact us at: Business Intelligence Lancashire County Council 2nd floor Christ Church Precinct County Hall Fishergate Hill Preston PR1 8XJ E: [email protected] W: www.lancashire.gov.uk/lancashire-insight • 1 • Lancashire DToC Nov-17 v02 Contents 1 Lancashire Overview ..................................................................................... 3 1.1 Lancashire Detail Nov-17 ...................................................................... 3 1.2 Proportions attributable to NHS and social
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Cheshire Place-Names
    INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Acton, 12 Bowdon, 14 Adlington, 7 Bradford, 12 Alcumlow, 9 Bradley, 12 Alderley, 3, 9 Bradwall, 14 Aldersey, 10 Bramhall, 14 Aldford, 1,2, 12, 21 Bredbury, 12 Alpraham, 9 Brereton, 14 Alsager, 10 Bridgemere, 14 Altrincham, 7 Bridge Traffbrd, 16 n Alvanley, 10 Brindley, 14 Alvaston, 10 Brinnington, 7 Anderton, 9 Broadbottom, 14 Antrobus, 21 Bromborough, 14 Appleton, 12 Broomhall, 14 Arden, 12 Bruera, 21 Arley, 12 Bucklow, 12 Arrowe, 3 19 Budworth, 10 Ashton, 12 Buerton, 12 Astbury, 13 Buglawton, II n Astle, 13 Bulkeley, 14 Aston, 13 Bunbury, 10, 21 Audlem, 5 Burton, 12 Austerson, 10 Burwardsley, 10 Butley, 10 By ley, 10 Bache, 11 Backford, 13 Baddiley, 10 Caldecote, 14 Baddington, 7 Caldy, 17 Baguley, 10 Calveley, 14 Balderton, 9 Capenhurst, 14 Barnshaw, 10 Garden, 14 Barnston, 10 Carrington, 7 Barnton, 7 Cattenhall, 10 Barrow, 11 Caughall, 14 Barthomley, 9 Chadkirk, 21 Bartington, 7 Cheadle, 3, 21 Barton, 12 Checkley, 10 Batherton, 9 Chelford, 10 Bebington, 7 Chester, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, 16, 17, Beeston, 13 19,21 Bexton, 10 Cheveley, 10 Bickerton, 14 Chidlow, 10 Bickley, 10 Childer Thornton, 13/; Bidston, 10 Cholmondeley, 9 Birkenhead, 14, 19 Cholmondeston, 10 Blackden, 14 Chorley, 12 Blacon, 14 Chorlton, 12 Blakenhall, 14 Chowley, 10 Bollington, 9 Christleton, 3, 6 Bosden, 10 Church Hulme, 21 Bosley, 10 Church Shocklach, 16 n Bostock, 10 Churton, 12 Bough ton, 12 Claughton, 19 171 172 INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Claverton, 14 Godley, 10 Clayhanger, 14 Golborne, 14 Clifton, 12 Gore, 11 Clive, 11 Grafton,
    [Show full text]