WAR ERA WASHINGTON, D.C., 1830-1865 Tamika Y. Richeson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WAR ERA WASHINGTON, D.C., 1830-1865 Tamika Y. Richeson CRIMES OF DISCONTENT: THE CONTOURS OF BLACK WOMEN’S LAW BREAKING IN CIVIL WAR ERA WASHINGTON, D.C., 1830-1865 Tamika Y. Richeson Charlottesville, Virginia Miami University of Ohio, B.A., 2007 Columbia University, M.A., 2008 University of Virginia, M.A., 2010 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty at the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia December 2014 Acknowledgements “Crimes of Discontent” would not be written had Rob Ellis not introduced me to the dusty stacks of the District of Columbia police precinct records at the National Archives. His kindness and patience with this “novice researcher” was critical to the concept of this dissertation. I have benefitted from numerous trips to the Library of Congress, the Library of Virginia, Maryland State Archives, and many efforts to make digitized collections available to students like myself. I have also received critical financial support from the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, the Raven Society, and the Scholar’s Lab at the University of Virginia. I owe a particular debt to the Scholar’s Lab for introducing me to the cutting-edge world of the digital humanities and for their patience and support for my ongoing digital project Black Women and the Civil War. My research is a product of my passion for black women’s history. For igniting my interest in black studies I have Rodney Coates to thank, and for introducing me to the methodological possibilities of history I owe a huge debt to my late mentor Manning Marable. Thank you to faculty members in the Corcoran Department of History, Claudrena Harold, S. Max Edelson, and Corrine Field for taking a chance on a graduate student that needed a little time to work through her ideas. A very special thanks to Jessica Lowe for joining the team on such short notice during her sabbatical. Also, I’m deeply honored that Grace Hale, Gary Gallagher and Thavolia Glymph agreed to serve on my dissertation committee. I admire them more than they know and I’m a better historian because of their thoughtful critiques and undeniable support of my career. I remember reading Out of the House of Bondage in my first-year seminar and feeling affirmed in my efforts to prioritize the experiences of enslaved and free black women as critical subjects of intellectual inquiry. Thank you Thavolia for being both an inspiration and a thoughtful mentor. A special thanks to my circle of academic warriors which include Cecilia Marquez, Gillett Rosenblith, Cynthia Greenlee, Willa Hammit Brown, Emily Senefield, Lauren Turek, Lee Bowden, Noel Stringham, and James Ambuske. Thank you for your acceptance and support throughout my journey at the University of Virginia, I am incredibly grateful for you and look forward to reading your groundbreaking scholarship. To Tanya Nichols, who I met through the university’s mentoring institute, you have become more than a mentor. Every week, our T&T “hour of power” provided much needed intellectual and spiritual sustenance through the hills and valleys of finishing graduate school. You have truly become a sister, and I thank God for the incredible woman that you are. To my invaluable mentors, Terryne Murphy, Danell Perkins, Daisy Lovelace, Tim Lovelace, and Patrick Alexander, I can’t thank you enough for your mentoring, prayers, and encouragement during the lowest moments of this process. Daisy made it possible for me to stay enrolled at the university when I learned I was pregnant. While it seems a bit informal to mention this in my dissertation acknowledgements, this tremendous act of kindness made my progress possible. Daisy, “my sister from another mother,” your heart to do whatever you can for a friend has left an imprint on my life. A special thanks goes to JP and Shelita for always asking about my dissertation, always offering to help with childcare, and always listening in my moments of frustration and despair. You have bestowed upon me a true understanding of friendship and I am better because of it. ii This journey began with a young girl who performed poorly on just about every subject except for history and art. I have my father to thank for always encouraging me despite my pitfalls, and a mother who modeled an incredible degree of work ethic. My father made tremendous personal and financial sacrifices so that I could attend college. I don’t know if either of us knew that anything would come of it, but I hope he is proud. To my sister who mothered me through adolescence and now through my own motherhood adventures, I cannot express enough gratitude for her love and friendship (and countless physical therapy sessions for my back). To my in-laws who more appropriately should be regarded as parents, and my little brother Jonathan, thank you for the endless support and for your willingness to drive all the way from Cleveland so that I could have uninterrupted writing time. You were family long before I became your daughter-in-law. To my godmother Barbara, you are the sweet gem in my life that saw a glimmer of potential in the struggling high school sophomore, and I thank you. Familial support is priceless to me; you all are the driving force of everything I do. I owe the largest debt to my advisor, Elizabeth Varon. In its skeletal form, with all of its errors, you never gave up on the ideas offered in this dissertation. You are a true intellectual, and an amazing teacher and mentor. Your ability to take bare elements and lead a student into the process of creating substance has left me in awe. I can only hope, that one day I can be the kind of professor that you are. Thank you for your incredible generosity towards me. To my husband, Marques, thank you for your love and support. Your belief in me accomplished more than you realize, and your ability to help me articulate my ideas through the messiness of my thoughts made this project possible. Your unconditional love and intellectual prowess has never failed to inspire me. To my Nari—you are the reason why I never quit. The joy you bring, the laughter, the sweet hugs, and the thought that you might have to overcome an obstacle one day, made me push through to the finish line. You and daddy mean everything to me—this is for you both. iii Abbreviations AA Accessible Archives ES/WES The Evening Star, The Washington Evening Star daily newspaper HSW Historical Society of Washington, D.C. District of Columbia LOC Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. MSA Maryland State Archives, Annapolis, MD NARA National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, D.C. NI The National Intelligencer NR The National Republican PSUA Pennsylvania State University Archives, Pennsylvania Civil War Newspaper Collection VHS Virginia Historical Society, Richmond, VA iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ii Illustrations and Tables vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Revolving Escape: Race Law and Freedom 15 Chapter 2: Stolen: Self-Emancipation and Self-Making 60 Chapter 3:‘Her Struggles Were Almost Superhuman’ 96 Chapter 4: ‘Colored Nymphs’: Antebellum and Wartime Sex Commerce 128 Chapter 5: Untenable Freedom: Black Women and Wartime Emancipation 167 Epilogue 210 v Illustrations and Tables Slave Coffle in Washington, D.C 40 Mary and Emily Edmonson 79 Table 4.1 Register of Coloured Bawdy Houses 148 Secrets of the Prison House 174 View of the Interior of the Jail 179 vi INTRODUCTION Modern scholarship on race in nineteenth-century Washington, D.C. tells a tale of two cities: the nation’s capital as both a bastion of slavery, Southern in character, and a laboratory for freedom, a hub of antislavery activism and free black reform. The decision of Congress to establish the territory formerly occupied by Maryland and Virginia as the new capital was a concession to Southern slaveholders in the Compromise of 1790. At its inception, race-based law in the District of Columbia took shape from legal restrictions in the codes of the Chesapeake region. The diamond-shaped city remained closely tied to the neighboring slave states in both law and culture. During the American Civil War, Congress enacted a series of emancipation edicts, disrupting the slaveholding consensus of the Chesapeake region. The end of the war would not only mark the abolition of slavery and antebellum black codes, but the collapse of the Southern slaveholding legal regime that ran through the borders of Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.1 With the decline of the Chesapeake tobacco economy, the District became a key site of the domestic slave trade, and of the “hiring out” system of enslavement, as slaveholders leased excess labor by “hiring out” slaves in the District. Hiring out and the domestic trade helped to keep the value and price of slaves high, particularly in the aftermath of the abolition of the international slave trade. Slaves and free blacks also constituted the labor force employed to construct the buildings that, over time, transformed Washington from a swampy frontier into a respectable city. All the while, 1 An Act for Establishing the Temporary and Permanent Seat of the Government of the United States, Statutes at Large, 1st Congress, 2nd Session 1791, LOC; Howells State Trials, vol. 20, cols 1-6, 79-82, 1816. 1 during the city’s formative years, pro-slavery ideology rang out in the halls of Congress. Slaveholders dominated the city’s political landscape, and as Southern politicians who converged on the city each legislative season joined the residential slaveholding elite, slaveholders played an outsized role in its social life as well.2 At the same time, antislavery forces too converged on the District.
Recommended publications
  • Southern Slave Vs. Military Laborer: Black Ambivalence Toward Joining the Union Army Lisa Clark
    Southern Adventist University KnowledgeExchange@Southern Senior Research Projects Southern Scholars 1996 Southern Slave vs. Military Laborer: Black Ambivalence Toward Joining the Union Army Lisa Clark Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/senior_research Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Lisa, "Southern Slave vs. Military Laborer: Black Ambivalence Toward Joining the Union Army" (1996). Senior Research Projects. 119. https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/senior_research/119 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Southern Scholars at KnowledgeExchange@Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Research Projects by an authorized administrator of KnowledgeExchange@Southern. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Southern Slave vs. Military Laborer: Black Ambivalence Toward Joining the Union Army by Usa Clark Aprfi 17, 1996 2 Fort Sumter was under fire! The war was on! The news flashed through the cotton fields and tobacco plantations of the South. For most slaves, the commencement of the Civil War brought hope. Enslaved, oppressed, denied education and self-determination, the southern black looked with eagerness to his emancipation. In many cases, the negro slave desired to help fight his former owners, to bring down the institution of slavery. Imagine his surprise, then, upon greeting the northern army with open arms, only to be forced to serve the white officers, cook for and clean up after the troops, and perform hard, manual labor for the military. There was D~glory on the battlefield. Promises made for equal pay were broken so many times they became meaningless. The mixed emotions engendered by this reality resulted in confusion and contradiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyman Trumbull: Author of the Thirteenth Amendment, Author of the Civil Rights Act, and the First Second Amendment Lawyer
    KOPEL (1117–1192).DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 5/2/16 4:20 PM Lyman Trumbull: Author of the Thirteenth Amendment, Author of the Civil Rights Act, and the First Second Amendment Lawyer David B. Kopel* This Article provides the first legal biography of lawyer and Senator Lyman Trumbull, one of the most important lawyers and politicians of the nineteenth century. Early in his career, as the leading anti-slavery lawyer in Illinois in the 1830s, he won the cases constricting and then abolishing slavery in that state; six decades later, Trumbull represented imprisoned labor leader Eugene Debs in the Supreme Court, and wrote the Populist Party platform. In between, Trumbull helped found the Republican Party, and served three U.S. Senate terms, chairing the judiciary committee. One of the greatest leaders of America’s “Second Founding,” Trumbull wrote the Thirteenth Amendment, the Civil Rights Act, and the Freedmen’s Bureau Act. The latter two were expressly intended to protect the Second Amendment rights of former slaves. Another Trumbull law, the Second Confiscation Act, was the first federal statute to providing for arming freedmen. After leaving the Senate, Trumbull continued his fight for arms rights for workingmen, bringing Presser v. Illinois to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1886, and Dunne v. Illinois to the Illinois Supreme Court in 1879. His 1894 Populist Party platform was a fiery affirmation of Second Amendment principles. In the decades following the end of President James Madison’s Administration in 1817, no American lawyer or legislator did as much as Trumbull in defense of Second Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Confiscation Act (August 6, 1861) Freedmen & Southern Society Project
    Maria Ward’s primary document project (designed with 8th graders in mind) Student objectives: ~ The student will analyze historical documents and use this knowledge to better understand Lincoln’s actions during the Civil War. ~The student will find evidence to support Lincoln’s belief that emancipation is for the purpose of saving the Union, and that it must be done in a constitutional manner. Documents: ~Abraham Lincoln’s Letter to Horace Greeley August 22, 1862 Teaching American History Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs at Ashland University http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?subcategory=4 ~The First Confiscation Act (August 6, 1861) Freedmen & Southern Society Project http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/conact1.htm ~Excerpt from the Proclamation Revoking General Hunter’s Order of Military Emancipation of May 9, 1862 Freedmen & Southern Society Project http://www.history.umd.edu/Freedmen/hunter.htm Narrative: Students will analyze Abraham Lincoln’s letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862, the (first) Confiscation Act of 1861 and an excerpt from Lincoln’s the Proclamation Revoking General Hunter’s Order of Military Emancipation of May 9, 1862 to explain and support Lincoln’s belief that the purpose of the war is to save the Union, and that any action regarding the emancipation of enslaved persons should be carried out in a constitutional manner. Narrative that is more like a lesson plan: Students will first analyze Abraham Lincoln’s letter to Horace Greeley, August 22, 1862. This letter is in response to Greeley’s open letter titled, “The Prayer of Twenty Millions” in which Greeley urges Lincoln to free the slaves.
    [Show full text]
  • 37Th Congress
    Thirty-Seventh Congress July 4, 1861-Mar. 3, 1863 First Administration of Abraham Lincoln Historical Background ............................................................................................................. 1 War or Peace? ............................................................................................................................. 2 Economic Trends and Conditions ....................................................................................... 4 1861 Events ................................................................................................................................. 5 1862 Events ................................................................................................................................. 6 Major Acts ..................................................................................................................................... 9 President Abraham Historical Background Lincoln By early June 1861, ten additional slave States had followed South Carolina into secession, and a convention of seceding States met in Montgomery, Alabama, to form a new government, the Confederate States of America. House Senate Although compromises continued to be proposed, neither the North nor the Majority Majority South really believed that they could agree to any further modification of Party: Party: their principles. President Abraham Lincoln insisted in his inaugural address Republican Republican (108 Seats) (31 seats) on March 4, 1861, that the Union was older than the Constitution,
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Search Complete
    Academic Search Complete Pavadinimas Prenumerata nuo Prenumerata iki Metai nuo Metai iki 1 Technology times 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20140601 20210327 2 Organization Development Review 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20190101 3 PRESENCE: Virtual & Augmented Reality 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20180101 4 Television Week 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20030310 20090601 5 Virginia Declaration of Rights and Cardinal Bellarmine 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 6 U.S. News & World Report: The Report 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20200124 7 Education Journal Review 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20180101 8 BioCycle CONNECT 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20200108 9 High Power Computing 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20191001 10 Economic Review (Uzbekistan) 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20130801 11 Civil Disobedience 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 12 Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 13 IUP Journal of Environmental & Healthcare Law 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 14 View of the Revolution (Through Indian Eyes) 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 15 Narrative of Her Life: Mary Jemison 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 16 Follette's Platform of 1924 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 17 Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error, v. John F. A. Sanford 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 18 U.S. News - The Civic Report 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20180928 20200117 19 Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present) 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 20 Geophysical Report 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 21 Adult Literacy 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 2000 22 Report on In-Class Variables: Fall 1987 & Fall 1992 2021-04-01 2021-12-31 2000 23 Report of investigation : the Aldrich Ames espionage case / Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,2021-04-01 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in the United States - Wikipedia Page 1 of 25
    Slavery in the United States - Wikipedia Page 1 of 25 Slavery in the United States Slavery in the United States was the legal institution of human chattel enslavement, primarily of Africans and African Americans, that existed in the United States of America in the 18th and 19th centuries. Slavery had been practiced by Americans under British rule from early colonial days, and was legal in all Thirteen Colonies at the time of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. It lasted until the end of the American Civil War. By the time of the American Revolution (1775–1783), the status of slave had been institutionalized as a racial caste associated with African ancestry.[1] When the United States Constitution was ratified (1789), a relatively small number of free people of color were among the voting citizens (male property owners).[2] During and immediately following the Revolutionary War, abolitionist laws were passed in most Northern states and a movement developed to abolish slavery. Most of these states had a higher proportion of free labor than in the South and economies based on different industries. They abolished slavery by the end of the 18th century, some with gradual systems that kept adults as slaves for two decades. However, the rapid expansion of the cotton industry in the Deep South after the invention of the cotton gin greatly increased demand for slave labor, and the An animation showing when United States territories and states Southern states continued as slave societies. Those states attempted to extend slavery into the new Western forbade or allowed slavery, 1789–1861.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 2012
    Underground Railroad Educational and Cultural Program Annual Report Model November 30, 2012 Underground Railroad Educational and Cultural Program CFDA 84.345 Project Name: Beneath the Underground and Beyond - The Flight to Freedom and Antebellum Communities in Maryland, 1830 - 1880: Resistance Along the Eastern Shore. Project Number: P345A105002 Project Director’s Name: Chris Haley Project Financial Manager’s Name: Nassir Resvan FY 2011 (October 2011 - September 30, 2012 Annual Report As per the URR Program’s Authorizing Legislation, The Maryland State Archives submits, for this fiscal year in which the organization received URR Program funding this report to the Secretary of Education that contains-- (A) A description of the programs and activities supported by the funding: • Using URR funds, the Maryland State Archives supported the work of its varied stakeholders of researchers, historians, curators and archivists by mining and making electronically accessible all the topics listed below: 1. Federal Census - Mining of the US Federal Census from the years 1830 - 1880 for the counties of Queen Anne, Kent and Dorchester Counties for all entries pertaining to free and enslaved Blacks - Census record mining involves the extraction of biographical data such as name, sex, age, race designation (Black or Mulatto), County District or Precinct, occupation, personal and real estate value and household status and entering that information into a searchable online database. Such information provides invaluable data for family historians, genealogists, scholars and historians whose research and subsequent products involve African American life during Maryland's 19th century before and after the Civil War. Due to funding from this grant, the Archives has been able to accumulate the following totals for the aforementioned counties: Federal Census Entries Year Queen Anne Kent Dorchester Total: 1830/1840 1,762 3,251 5,013 1850/1860 3 5,601 8,711 8,714 1870/1880 2,118 3,861 2,231 8,210 Total: 2,121 11,224 14,193 27,538 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pearl Incident Packet
    Handout 2 Student Name: _____________________________________ Date: ____________ Teacher:___________________________________________ Class Period: ____ The Pearl Incident Source Packet Document A Source: Excerpted from Daniel Drayton’s “Personal Memoir of Daniel Drayton: For four years and four months a prisoner (for charity’s sake) in Washington jail” (1855). Retrieved from Library of Congress. Headnote: Daniel Drayton was the commander of the schooler The Pearl. He was an oyster fisherman who did not own this boat. He paid to borrow it from another man, name unknown, to complete the mission. It is said that Drayton had completed a mission to free enslaved people before, but demanded more and more payment for that mission. He was paid $100 dollars (a large sum for the time) to complete this mission. “Passing along the street, I met Captain Sayres, and knowing that he was sailing a small bay-craft, called The Pearl, and learning from him that business was dull with him, I proposed the enterprise to him...Captain Sayres engaged in this enterprise merely as a matter of business. I, too, was to be paid for my time and trouble,—an offer which the low state of my pecuniary (financial) affairs, and the necessity of supporting my family, did not allow me to decline. But this was not, by any means, my sole or principal motive. I undertook it out of sympathy for the enslaved, and from my desire to do something to further the cause of universal liberty. Such being the different ground upon which Sayres and myself stood, I did not think it necessary
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report 2011
    Underground Railroad Educational and Cultural Program Annual Report Model November 30, 2012 Underground Railroad Educational and Cultural Program CFDA 84.345 Project Name: Beneath the Underground and Beyond - The Flight to Freedom and Antebellum Communities in Maryland, 1830 - 1880: Resistance Along the Eastern Shore. Project Number: P345A105002 Project Director’s Name: Chris Haley Project Financial Manager’s Name: Nassir Resvan FY 2011 (October 2010 - September 30, 2011 Annual Report As per the URR Program’s Authorizing Legislation, The Maryland State Archives submits, for this fiscal year in which the organization received URR Program funding this report to the Secretary of Education that contains-- (A) A description of the programs and activities supported by the funding: • Using URR funds, the Maryland State Archives supported the work of its varied stakeholders of researchers, historians, curators and archivists by mining and making electronically accessible all the topics listed below: 1. Federal Census - Federal Census from the years 1830 - 1880 for the counties of Caroline, Queen Anne and Dorchester County for all entries pertaining to free and enslaved Blacks - Census record mining involves the extraction of biographical data such as name, sex, age, race designation (Black or Mulatto), County District or Precinct, occupation, personal and real estate value and household status and entering that information into a searchable online database. Such information provides invaluable data for family historians, genealogists, scholars and historians whose research and subsequent products involve African American life during Maryland's 19th century before and after the Civil War. Due to funding from this grant, the Archives has been able to accumulate the following totals for the aforementioned counties: Federal Census Entries Year Caroline Queen Anne Dorchester Total 1830/1840 1,282 1,045 1,592 3,919 1850/1860 5,583 6,626 3,914 16,123 1870/1880 7,900 1 13,667 21,568 Total: 14,765 7,672 19,173 41,610 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Munitions and the Continuation of War and Politics by Other Means
    _________________________________________________________________________Swansea University E-Theses Image warfare in the war on terror: Image munitions and the continuation of war and politics by other means. Roger, Nathan Philip How to cite: _________________________________________________________________________ Roger, Nathan Philip (2010) Image warfare in the war on terror: Image munitions and the continuation of war and politics by other means.. thesis, Swansea University. http://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42350 Use policy: _________________________________________________________________________ This item is brought to you by Swansea University. Any person downloading material is agreeing to abide by the terms of the repository licence: copies of full text items may be used or reproduced in any format or medium, without prior permission for personal research or study, educational or non-commercial purposes only. The copyright for any work remains with the original author unless otherwise specified. The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder. Permission for multiple reproductions should be obtained from the original author. Authors are personally responsible for adhering to copyright and publisher restrictions when uploading content to the repository. Please link to the metadata record in the Swansea University repository, Cronfa (link given in the citation reference above.) http://www.swansea.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/ris-support/ Image warfare in the war on terror: Image munitions and the continuation of war and politics by other means Nathan Philip Roger Submitted to the University of Wales in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Swansea University 2010 ProQuest Number: 10798058 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 of 116 DOCUMENTS Copyright 2005 The
    Page 1 88 of 116 DOCUMENTS Copyright 2005 The Washington Post The Washington Post February 6, 2005 Sunday Final Edition SECTION: Magazine; W14 LENGTH: 5190 words HEADLINE: The 'Snow Riot'; When a young slave rattled his chains, a nation's hypocrisy was revealed -- and Washington discovered that the man who wrote the national anthem had a thing or two to learn about freedom BYLINE: Jefferson Morley BODY: THE LAMPLIGHTER CAME AROUND AT DUSK. With his long flaming pole poked skyward, he sparked the bowls of oil atop the fluted posts around Lafayette Square. In the shadowy light, a Mr. Watson, walking home at around 11 o'clock on Tuesday evening, August 4, 1835, encountered Arthur Bowen, an 18-year-old slave in the house of Mrs. Anna Maria Thornton, one of the capital's finest ladies. As Watson would later say, Arthur was "much intoxicated." The sight of Arthur Bowen drunk on whiskey was not uncommon around Washington City during the long, hot summer of 1835. Anna Thornton had arranged to hire him out, but would later say he had been somewhat spoiled and refused to take orders from any woman. As Anna would note in her diary, Arthur grew fond of drinking "ardent spirits" while befriending free Negroes in a debating society who talked with him about slavery, the Constitution and his rights as a human being. As Arthur loitered in Lafayette Square that night, reminders of his plight were all around. Across the way, the president's house was dark because Andrew Jackson was away. His slaves were sleeping in bedrooms on the second floor and in the attic.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Eight “A Strong but Judicious Enemy to Slavery”: Congressman Lincoln (1847-1849) Lincoln's Entire Public Service O
    Chapter Eight “A Strong but Judicious Enemy to Slavery”: Congressman Lincoln (1847-1849) Lincoln’s entire public service on the national level before his election as president was a single term in the U. S. House. Though he had little chance to distinguish himself there, his experience proved a useful education in dealing with Congress and patronage. WASHINGTON, D.C. Arriving in Washington on December 2, 1847, the Lincolns found themselves in a “dark, narrow, unsightly” train depot, a building “literally buried in and surrounded with mud and filth of the most offensive kind.”1 A British traveler said he could scarcely imagine a “more miserable station.”2 Emerging from this “mere shed, of slight construction, designed for temporary use” which was considered “a disgrace” to the railroad company as well as “the city that tolerates it,”3 they beheld an “an ill-contrived, 1 Saturday Evening News (Washington), 14 August 1847. 2 Alexander MacKay, The Western World, or, Travels in the United States in 1846-47 (3 vols.; London: Richard Bentley, 1850), 1:162. 3 Letter by “Mercer,” n.d., Washington National Intelligencer, 16 November 1846. The author of this letter thought that the station was “in every respect bad: it is cramped in space, unsightly in appearance, inconvenient in its position, and ill adapted to minister to the comfort of travellers in the entire character of its arrangements.” Cf. Wilhelmus Bogart Bryan, A History of the National Capital from Its Foundation through the Period of the Adoption of the Organic Act (2 vols.; New York: Macmillan, 1914-16), 2:357.
    [Show full text]