DOCSLIB.ORG

The Hippopotamus Defence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Hippopotamus Defence Alessio De Santis The Hippopotamus Defence A Deceptively Dangerous Universal Chess Opening System for Black New In Chess 2019 Contents Explanation of symbols...............................................6 Preface ............................................................. 7 The Hippopotamus in 60 seconds ..................................... 9 Layout of the book and study method................................. 10 Stage 1: Flash . 11 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Hippopotamus system ............12 Chapter 2: A universal defence or not? ..........................15 Chapter 3: The idea behind the Hippopotamus defence...........21 Chapter 4: Why play the Hippopotamus?........................23 Chapter 5: Hippopotamus or semi-Hippopotamus?...............25 Chapter 6: The strategic elements of the Hippopotamus ......... 30 Chapter 7: The significance of the Hippopotamus moves......... 46 Chapter 8: The significance of the semi-Hippopotamus moves ....53 Chapter 9: Three famous Hippopotamuses ......................58 Stage 2: Reflection . 65 Chapter 10: History and development of the Hippopotamus ..... 66 Chapter 11: How to classify Hippopotamus games................76 Chapter 12: Instructive games .................................81 Section 1: From the king’s centre to a King’s Indian centre ......82 Section 2: From the king’s centre to a French centre...........107 Section 3: From the classical centre to a Sicilian centre ........122 Section 4: From the classical centre to an open e-file ..........132 Section 5: From the classical centre to an open d-file ..........138 Section 6: Extended 3-pawn king’s centre (Austrian Attack) ♙f4+♙e4+♙d4.....................146 Section 7: Attack with the h6♙+g5♙ and attack with the a6♙+b5♙..........................165 Section 8: Using the f5♙ ...................................181 Section 9: Extended 3-pawn queen’s centre ♙e4+♙d4+♙c4 . .188 Section 10: Benoni structures ...............................207 Section 11: 4-pawn centre ♙c4+♙d4+♙e4+♙f4 ................211 Section 12: 1-pawn centres..................................218 Section 13: The Super-Hippopotamus ........................237 5 The Hippopotamus Defence Stage 3: In depth . 245 Chapter 13: Elements of advanced strategy .................... 246 Chapter 14: Theory ..........................................258 Section 1: Theoretical problems in the 2-pawn centre (classical centre) .................................259 Section 2: Theoretical problems in the 3-pawn centre (Austrian Attack) ............................... 266 Section 3: Theoretical problems in the 3-pawn queen’s centre ..275 Chapter 15: Mistakes to avoid .................................281 Chapter 16: Complex games ..................................291 Points to remember when building a repertoire........................313 Repertoire with 1...g6................................................314 Repertoire with 1...b6 ...............................................315 Index of players ....................................................317 Bibliography ......................................................320 Explanation of symbols The chessboard with its coordinates: 8 TsLdMlSt 7 jJjJjJjJ 6 䩲 White stands slightly better ._._._._ 䩱 Black stands slightly better 5 _._._._. 4 White stands better ._._._._ Black stands better 3 _._._._. White has a decisive advantage 2 IiIiIiIi Black has a decisive advantage 1 rNbQkBnR balanced position ∞ unclear a b c d e f g h ⇆ with counterplay q White to move ! good move n Black to move !! excellent move ♔ King ? bad move ♕ Queen ?? blunder ♖ Rook !? interesting move ♗ Bishop ?! dubious move ♘ Knight N novelty 6 Preface Hello to all my old and new readers. In this book I propose to you the dangerous and underrated Hippopotamus system, a ‘universal’ defence for Black against all White’s possible openings: 1.e4, 1.d4, 1.c4, 1.f4, Colle, London, Trompowsky, Réti and minor ones. For me this system has a great sentimental and practical value as it was my main defence in the period when I achieved three IM norms. Back in 2006, I wrote a book on this set-up which sold out quickly and is now unavailable. In the meantime the system has grown and has been noticed by many players, both at normal Open level and by top GMs. I myself gained a fourth IM norm thanks to the semi-Hippopotamus, in a key game against the ‘living legend’ Romanishin, and several students of mine have had success with this system. In short, now is the right time for a completely new work on the Hippopotamus system, supplemented by a full discussion of the semi-Hippopotamus, which was left unexplored in the earlier book. An ever wider public is looking for clear and simple systems of play, to avoid getting lost in the endless maze of opening theory, and the Hippopotamus really fits the bill here. The book is aimed at everyone, in that the explanations are as detailed as possible. Conversely, using the opening itself will be more suitable for some than others. In the band from beginners up to Elo 1800 it can be used with light preparation, as games are decided by factors that lie outside the opening; in the 1800-2100 range, a good knowledge of the strategy and a careful study of move orders will be needed. Above the 2100 threshold, the defence is still perfectly sound but, for competitive reasons, it is kept back as a surprise weapon because it requires accurate preparation as well as deeper study by yourself with a computer. It’s time to get down to work. Enjoy your Hippopotamus games! Alessio De Santis Piacenza 2018 7 The Hippopotamus in 60 seconds The Hippopotamus is a The semi-Hippopotamus ‘universal’ set-up for Black, comes about when it isn’t against all White openings. possible, or suitable, to complete all the moves of the basic set-up. T_.dM_.t T_LdM_.t _LjSsJl. _.jSjJlJ Jj.jJ_Jj J_.j.sJ_ _._._._. _J_._._. ._._._._ ._._._._ _._._._. _._._._. IiIiIiIi IiIiIiIi rNbQkBnR rNbQkBnR T_.d.tM_ T_.dM_.t jL_SsJlJ jL_SlJj. .j.jJ_J_ .j._Js.j _.j._._. _.jJ_._. ._._._._ ._._._._ _._._._. _._._._. IiIiIiIi IiIiIiIi rNbQkBnR rNbQkBnR T_.dM_.t Ts.dMl.t jLjSlJjJ jLjJ_.jJ .j.jJs._ .j._Js._ _._._._. _._._J_. ._._._._ ._._._._ _._._._. _._._._. IiIiIiIi IiIiIiIi rNbQkBnR rNbQkBnR There is only one Hippopotamus, there are many semi-Hippos. 9 The Hippopotamus Defence Layout of the book and study method This book is designed to be studied in three parts, corresponding to three different levels of detail. You can study one, two or three of the sections according to how much preparation you need. The many diagrams given allow you to study large parts of the book by following the moves without a board from one diagram to the next. Stage 1: Flash The first stage makes much use of visualization of positions, rather than memorizing moves. Here you’ll find the basics for playing the Hippopotamus straight away, advantages, disadvantages and a quick outline of strategic themes and recurring motifs. This section might take you no more than 3-4 hours of work, depending on your playing strength and how quickly you learn. Stage 2: Reflection The second stage introduces you to the study of complete strategies and the problems posed by your opponent. It is the longest section, full of instructive annotated games without the burden of theory. The knowledge contained in the first two levels is often adequate for me to compete up to international level, given that many opponents are not as well prepared for the Hippopotamus as they are for other openings. Stage 3: In depth In the third stage we’ll do a detailed study of the theoretical problems (often not known by White either), but still in a form that’s manageable for the club player. This is the part where semi-Hippopotamuses predominate, because these come about to counter specific ideas by White. 10 Stage 1: Flash TOPICS • Chapter 1 – Introduction to the Hippopotamus system • Chapter 2 – A universal defence or not? • Chapter 3 – The idea behind the Hippopotamus defence • Chapter 4 – Why play the Hippopotamus? • Chapter 5 – Hippopotamus or semi-Hippopotamus? • Chapter 6 – The strategic elements of the Hippopotamus • Chapter 7 – The significance of the Hippopotamus moves • Chapter 8 – The significance of the semi-Hippopotamus moves • Chapter 9 – Three famous Hippopotamuses 11 Stage 1: Flash CHAPTER 7 The significance of the Hippopotamus moves Now we will look at the Hippopotamus concept, the significance of each move and take a look ahead to some finesses. You can start off with 1...g6 or 1...b6. Starting with 1...g6 1.e4 centre, as prescribed in the chess The king’s pawn opening 1.e4 is the bibles. most common move, you’ll meet it 2...♗g7 40% of the time. You complete the fianchetto by 1...g6 deploying the bishop. You fianchetto on the kingside to move the dark-squared bishop onto TsLdM_St the long diagonal h8-a1. jJjJjJlJ ._._._J_ TsLdMlSt _._._._. jJjJjJ_J ._.iI_._ ._._._J_ _._._._. _._._._. IiI_.iIi ._._I_._ rNbQkBnR _._._._. IiIi.iIi Note that your king’s bishop is rNbQkBnR attacking the d4♙, but it’s defended by the white queen. Had you begun Since this fianchetto is present in with 1...b6/2...♗b7, the attack would the Pirc/Modern/Dragon, White be on the undefended e4♙. needs to bear in mind a great many 3.♘c3 transpositions. White develops naturally. For him You can start off with 1...d6, 1...e6, it is too early for drastic moves or immediately 1...a6, 1...h6, each of like 3.f4, against which you have these requires special tuning to deal valid options such as 3...c5, or 3... with the problem of the Austrian c6 followed by 4...d5, or even 3...d5 Attack. immediately, with a good type of 2.d4 Gurgenidze System, in which Black White brings up a second pawn controls the light squares.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1999/6 Layout
    Virginia Chess Newsletter 1999 - #6 1 The Chesapeake Challenge Cup is a rotating club team trophy that grew out of an informal rivalry between two Maryland clubs a couple years ago. Since Chesapeake then the competition has opened up and the Arlington Chess Club captured the cup from the Fort Meade Chess Armory on October 15, 1999, defeating the 1 1 Challenge Cup erstwhile cup holders 6 ⁄2-5 ⁄2. The format for the Chesapeake Cup is still evolving but in principle the idea is that a defense should occur about once every six months, and any team from the “Chesapeake Bay drainage basin” is eligible to issue a challenge. “Choosing the challenger is a rather informal process,” explained Kurt Eschbach, one of the Chesapeake Cup's founding fathers. “Whoever speaks up first with a credible bid gets to challenge, except that we will give preference to a club that has never played for the Cup over one that has already played.” To further encourage broad participation, the match format calls for each team to field players of varying strength. The basic formula stipulates a 12-board match between teams composed of two Masters (no limit), two Expert, and two each from classes A, B, C & D. The defending team hosts the match and plays White on odd-numbered boards. It is possible that a particular challenge could include additional type boards (juniors, seniors, women, etc) by mutual agreement between the clubs. Clubs interested in coming to Arlington around April, 2000 to try to wrest away the Chesapeake Cup should call Dan Fuson at (703) 532-0192 or write him at 2834 Rosemary Ln, Falls Church VA 22042.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Russia's Intelligence Agencies
    EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON FOREIGN BRIEF POLICY RELATIONS ecfr.eu PUTIN’S HYDRA: INSIDE RUSSIA’S INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Mark Galeotti For his birthday in 2014, Russian President Vladimir Putin was treated to an exhibition of faux Greek friezes showing SUMMARY him in the guise of Hercules. In one, he was slaying the • Russia’s intelligence agencies are engaged in an “hydra of sanctions”.1 active and aggressive campaign in support of the Kremlin’s wider geopolitical agenda. The image of the hydra – a voracious and vicious multi- headed beast, guided by a single mind, and which grows • As well as espionage, Moscow’s “special services” new heads as soon as one is lopped off – crops up frequently conduct active measures aimed at subverting in discussions of Russia’s intelligence and security services. and destabilising European governments, Murdered dissident Alexander Litvinenko and his co-author operations in support of Russian economic Yuri Felshtinsky wrote of the way “the old KGB, like some interests, and attacks on political enemies. multi-headed hydra, split into four new structures” after 1991.2 More recently, a British counterintelligence officer • Moscow has developed an array of overlapping described Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) as and competitive security and spy services. The a hydra because of the way that, for every plot foiled or aim is to encourage risk-taking and multiple operative expelled, more quickly appear. sources, but it also leads to turf wars and a tendency to play to Kremlin prejudices. The West finds itself in a new “hot peace” in which many consider Russia not just as an irritant or challenge, but • While much useful intelligence is collected, as an outright threat.
    [Show full text]
  • FIDE Laws of Chess
    FIDE Laws of Chess FIDE Laws of Chess cover over-the-board play. The Laws of Chess have two parts: 1. Basic Rules of Play and 2. Competition Rules. The English text is the authentic version of the Laws of Chess (which was adopted at the 84th FIDE Congress at Tallinn (Estonia) coming into force on 1 July 2014. In these Laws the words ‘he’, ‘him’, and ‘his’ shall be considered to include ‘she’ and ‘her’. PREFACE The Laws of Chess cannot cover all possible situations that may arise during a game, nor can they regulate all administrative questions. Where cases are not precisely regulated by an Article of the Laws, it should be possible to reach a correct decision by studying analogous situations which are discussed in the Laws. The Laws assume that arbiters have the necessary competence, sound judgement and absolute objectivity. Too detailed a rule might deprive the arbiter of his freedom of judgement and thus prevent him from finding a solution to a problem dictated by fairness, logic and special factors. FIDE appeals to all chess players and federations to accept this view. A necessary condition for a game to be rated by FIDE is that it shall be played according to the FIDE Laws of Chess. It is recommended that competitive games not rated by FIDE be played according to the FIDE Laws of Chess. Member federations may ask FIDE to give a ruling on matters relating to the Laws of Chess. BASIC RULES OF PLAY Article 1: The nature and objectives of the game of chess 1.1 The game of chess is played between two opponents who move their pieces on a square board called a ‘chessboard’.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999/1 Layout
    Virginia Chess Newsletter 1999 - #1 1 1999 Virginia Open THE 1999 VIRGINIA OPEN played Jan 22-24 in Fredricksburg, saw a 3-way tie for 1st in the Open section between Adrian Negulescu, Emory Tate & Leonid Filatov. Each scored 4-1. Lance Rackham tal- 1 1 lied 5 ⁄2- ⁄2 to claim clear 1st in the Amateur section. The Open winners rose to the top by different meth- ‹óóóóóóóó‹ ods. Negulescu, a visiting IM from Rumania, took õÏ›‹Ò‹ÌÙ›ú the “professional” route, jumping out 3-0 and then taking it easy on the last day, drawing fellow IMs õ›‡›‹›‹·‹ú Larry Kaufman and Richard Delaune in fairly bloodless fashion. Tate, a co-winner last year as well, õ‹›‹·‹›‡›ú had to fight back from behind this time after losing to Negulescu in round 3. He accomplished the task õ›‹Â‹·‹„‹ú in fine style, jumping all over Kaufman right out of õ‡›fi›fi›‹Ôú the opening in the final round. Filatov executed the semi Swiss Gambit, conceding a draw in the very õfl‹›‰›‹›‹ú first round and piling up points thereafter against mostly lower-rated opposition. õ‹fl‹›‹Áfiflú õ›‹›‹›ÍÛ‹ú Larry Kaufman - Emory Tate Sicilian ‹ìììììììì‹ Notes by Macon Shibut 25...Qxg5! (When the smoke clears Black gets more 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 f3 e5 6 Nb3 than enough for his queen in view of the possible Be7 7 c4 a5 8 Be3 a4 9 N3d2 0-0 10 Bd3 Nc6 11 a3 fork on e4) 26 Qxg5 Rxf2 27 Rxf2 Nxf2 28 Qxg6 (evidently an error) 11...Nd7! 12 0-0 Bg5 13 Bf2 Nfxe4 (Now Black will regroup his pieces for a com- Nc5 14 Bc2 Nd4! (White is already remarkably tied bined attack on White’s king, while White can only up, with hardly any moves.) 15 f4!? (Under the cir- hope for perpetual check.) 29 g4 Rf8 30 g5 Nd2! 31 cumstances you can’t fault White for trying this.
    [Show full text]
  • UIL Text 111212
    UIL Chess Puzzle Solvin g— Fall/Winter District 2016-2017 —Grades 4 and 5 IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS: [Test-administrators, please read text in this box aloud.] This is the UIL Chess Puzzle Solving Fall/Winter District Test for grades four and five. There are 20 questions on this test. You have 30 minutes to complete it. All questions are multiple choice. Use the answer sheet to mark your answers. Multiple choice answers pur - posely do not indicate check, checkmate, or e.p. symbols. You will be awarded one point for each correct answer. No deductions will be made for incorrect answers on this test. Finishing early is not rewarded, even to break ties. So use all of your time. Some of the questions may be hard, but all of the puzzles are interesting! Good luck and have fun! If you don’t already know chess notation, reading and referring to the section below on this page will help you. How to read and answer questions on this test Piece Names Each chessman can • To answer the questions on this test, you’ll also be represented need to know how to read chess moves. It’s by a symbol, except for the pawn. simple to do. (Figurine Notation) K King Q • Every square on the board has an “address” Queen R made up of a letter and a number. Rook B Bishop N Knight Pawn a-h (We write the file it’s on.) • To make them easy to read, the questions on this test use the figurine piece symbols on the right, above.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Play Chess Using Temporal Differences
    Machine Learning, 40, 243–263, 2000 c 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Learning to Play Chess Using Temporal Differences JONATHAN BAXTER [email protected] Department of Systems Engineering, Australian National University 0200, Australia ANDREW TRIDGELL [email protected] LEX WEAVER [email protected] Department of Computer Science, Australian National University 0200, Australia Editor: Sridhar Mahadevan Abstract. In this paper we present TDLEAF(), a variation on the TD() algorithm that enables it to be used in conjunction with game-tree search. We present some experiments in which our chess program “KnightCap” used TDLEAF() to learn its evaluation function while playing on Internet chess servers. The main success we report is that KnightCap improved from a 1650 rating to a 2150 rating in just 308 games and 3 days of play. As a reference, a rating of 1650 corresponds to about level B human play (on a scale from E (1000) to A (1800)), while 2150 is human master level. We discuss some of the reasons for this success, principle among them being the use of on-line, rather than self-play. We also investigate whether TDLEAF() can yield better results in the domain of backgammon, where TD() has previously yielded striking success. Keywords: temporal difference learning, neural network, TDLEAF, chess, backgammon 1. Introduction Temporal Difference learning, first introduced by Samuel (Samuel, 1959) and later extended and formalized by Sutton (Sutton, 1988) in his TD() algorithm, is an elegant technique for approximating the expected long term future cost (or cost-to-go) of a stochastic dy- namical system as a function of the current state.
    [Show full text]
  • More About Checkmate
    MORE ABOUT CHECKMATE The Queen is the best piece of all for getting checkmate because it is so powerful and controls so many squares on the board. There are very many ways of getting CHECKMATE with a Queen. Let's have a look at some of them, and also some STALEMATE positions you must learn to avoid. You've already seen how a Rook can get CHECKMATE XABCDEFGHY with the help of a King. Put the Black King on the side of the 8-+k+-wQ-+( 7+-+-+-+-' board, the White King two squares away towards the 6-+K+-+-+& middle, and a Rook or a Queen on any safe square on the 5+-+-+-+-% same side of the board as the King will give CHECKMATE. 4-+-+-+-+$ In the first diagram the White Queen checks the Black King 3+-+-+-+-# while the White King, two squares away, stops the Black 2-+-+-+-+" King from escaping to b7, c7 or d7. If you move the Black 1+-+-+-+-! King to d8 it's still CHECKMATE: the Queen stops the Black xabcdefghy King moving to e7. But if you move the Black King to b8 is CHECKMATE! that CHECKMATE? No: the King can escape to a7. We call this sort of CHECKMATE the GUILLOTINE. The Queen comes down like a knife to chop off the Black King's head. But there's another sort of CHECKMATE that you can ABCDEFGH do with a King and Queen. We call this one the KISS OF 8-+k+-+-+( DEATH. Put the Black King on the side of the board, 7+-wQ-+-+-' the White Queen on the next square towards the middle 6-+K+-+-+& and the White King where it defends the Queen and you 5+-+-+-+-% 4-+-+-+-+$ get something like our next diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • IVAN II Operating Manual Model 712
    IVAN II Operating Manual Model 712 Congratulations on your purchase of Excalibur Electronics’ IVAN! You’ve purchased both your own personal chess trainer and a partner who’s always ready for a game—and who can improve as you do! Talking and audio sounds add anoth- Play a Game Right Away er dimension to your IVAN computer for After you have installed the batteries, the increased enjoyment and play value. display will show the chess board with all the pieces on their starting squares. Place Find the Pieces the plastic chess pieces on their start Turn Ivan over carefully with his chess- squares using the LCD screen as a guide. board facedown. Find the door marked The dot-matrix display will show “PIECE COMPARTMENT DOOR”. 01CHESS. This indicates you are at the Open it and remove the chess pieces. first move of the game and ready to play Replace the door and set the pieces aside chess. for now. Unless you instruct it otherwise, IVAN gives you the White pieces—the ones at Install the Batteries the bottom of the board. White always With Ivan facedown, find the door moves first. You’re ready to play! marked “BATTERY DOOR’. Open it and insert four (4) fresh, alkaline AA batteries Making your move in the battery holder. Note the arrange- Besides deciding on a good move, you ment of the batteries called for by the dia- have to move the piece in a way that Ivan gram in the holder. Make sure that the will recognize what's been played. Think positive tip of each battery matches up of communicating your move as a two- with the + sign in the battery compart- step process--registering the FROM ment so that polarity will be correct.
    [Show full text]
  • ENDING the ENERGY STALEMATE a Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America’S Energy Challenges
    ENDING THE ENERGY STALEMATE A Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America’s Energy Challenges THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON ENERGY POLICY December 2004 Cover: U.S. Government Satellite Images: Western Hemisphere at Night ENDING THE ENERGY STALEMATE A Bipartisan Strategy to Meet America’s Energy Challenges THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON ENERGY POLICY December 2004 www.energycommission.org PREAMBLE This report is a product of a bipartisan Commission of 16 members of diverse expertise and affiliations, addressing many complex and contentious topics. It is inevitable that arriving at a consensus document in these circumstances entailed innumerable compromises. Accordingly, it should not be assumed that every member is entirely satisfied with every formulation in the report, or even that all of us would agree with any given recommendation if it were taken in isolation. Rather, we have reached consensus on the report and its recommendations as a package, which taken as a whole offers a balanced and comprehensive approach to the economic, national security, and environmental challenges that the energy issue presents to our nation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The National Commission on Energy Policy was founded in 2002 by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and its partners: The Pew Charitable Trusts, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and the Energy Foundation. The Commission would like to express its sincere appreciation for the Hewlett Foundation’s vision and the strong support of its partners. The Commission would also like to thank the following Commissioner representatives for their many contributions to the Commission’s ongoing work and to this report: Gordon Binder, Principal, Aqua International Partners; Kelly Sims Gallagher, Director, Energy Technology Innovation Project, Belfer Center for Science & International Affairs, Harvard University; Marianne S.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact: Amanda Weinberg Phone: 610-565-1023 E-Mail: [email protected]
    Contact: Amanda Weinberg Phone: 610-565-1023 E-mail: [email protected] THE STRONGEST-EVER CHESS TOURNAMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA RICHARD ARONOW FOUNDATION INVITATIONAL COMPLETED THREE PLAYERS OBTAIN INTERNATIONAL MASTER NORMS A suspense-filled evening on Sunday, July 21, 2002 saw the completion of the Richard Aronow Foundation Invitational Tournament, which was held at the Franklin Mercantile Chess Club in Center City, Philadelphia, from July 12 to July 21. The final game completed was the decisive one, in which the first prizewinner, Grandmaster Gennady Zaitchik of Georgia, competed with Grandmaster Yevgeny Najer of Russia for the top prize of $1000. Najer and National Master Yury Lapshun tied for second and third place, and won $250 each. International Master Luis Chiong of the Philippines won a $150 “brilliancy” prize for his performance against International Master Oladapo Adu of Nigeria, by decision of the Tournament Committee. National Masters Yevgeny Gershov and Bryan Smith split a $150 “best endgame” prize for their match, by decision of President Richard Costigan of the Franklin Mercantile Chess Club. Three participants: National Masters Mikhail Belorusov and Stanislav Kriventsov of Pennsylvania, and Yury Lapshun of New York, obtained norms which must precede a nomination for the title of International Master by the international chess organization, the Federation International des Echecs (“FIDE”). Kriventsov and Lapshun each obtained their third and final requisite norm, and will likely be nominated as International Masters when FIDE convenes in October. This tournament was organized to serve two purposes: 1. to promote high-level, invitational chess tournaments in the U.S., and 2. to publicize the Richard Aronow Foundation and the need for research on autism.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 123 - (Vol.VIH)
    No. 123 - (Vol.VIH) January 1997 Editorial Board editors John Roycrqfttf New Way Road, London, England NW9 6PL Edvande Gevel Binnen de Veste 36, 3811 PH Amersfoort, The Netherlands Spotlight-column: J. Heck, Neuer Weg 110, D-47803 Krefeld, Germany Opinions-column: A. Pallier, La Mouziniere, 85190 La Genetouze, France Treasurer: J. de Boer, Zevenenderdrffi 40, 1251 RC Laren, The Netherlands EDITORIAL achievement, recorded only in a scientific journal, "The chess study is close to the chess game was not widely noticed. It was left to the dis- because both study and game obey the same coveries by Ken Thompson of Bell Laboratories rules." This has long been an argument used to in New Jersey, beginning in 1983, to put the boot persuade players to look at studies. Most players m. prefer studies to problems anyway, and readily Aside from a few upsets to endgame theory, the give the affinity with the game as the reason for set of 'total information' 5-raan endgame their preference. Your editor has fought a long databases that Thompson generated over the next battle to maintain the literal truth of that ar- decade demonstrated that several other endings gument. It was one of several motivations in might require well over 50 moves to win. These writing the final chapter of Test Tube Chess discoveries arrived an the scene too fast for FIDE (1972), in which the Laws are separated into to cope with by listing exceptions - which was the BMR (Board+Men+Rules) elements, and G first expedient. Then in 1991 Lewis Stiller and (Game) elements, with studies firmly identified Noam Elkies using a Connection Machine with the BMR realm and not in the G realm.
    [Show full text]
  • Pop-Up Course Catalogue (May 2020) Please Read Through the Following Course Descriptions to Help You Make Your Choices for Indep
    Pop-Up Course Catalogue (May 2020) Please read through the following course descriptions to help you make your choices for independent work and pop-up courses during the weeks of May 11th through the 29th. You will complete a separate Google Form indicating your choices for pop-up ​ courses. Three-Week Offerings (These are classes that will run for all three weeks; you must take all three weeks unless otherwise ​ indicated.) Course Name Teacher Course Description Things Are Looking Up: Ms. Labieniec In this course students will explore some of the most fundamental aspects Astronomy and Your of astronomy with the goal of achieving a better understanding of our Backyard Sky place in the cosmos. Week 1: The scale of space, Week 2: The Scale of time, Week 3: We are stardust. Students will learn to recognize common objects in the night sky and will maintain a weekly observing journal. No telescope necessary! Kia Ora: The Films of Ms. Hatcher In February 2020, Taika Waititi became the first person of indigenous Taika Waititi descent to win an Oscar for his screenplay of Jojo Rabbit. Before he ​ ​ became a fixture in Hollywood, Waititi made a name for himself by writing, directing, and acting in quirky independent films in his native New Zealand. This course will cover three of his first full-length films: The Hunt ​ for the Wilderpeople (week 1), Boy (week 2), and Eagle vs. Shark (week ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 3). We will explore the ways that Waititi combines his Maori heritage, his Kiwi sense of humor, and his love of the natural beauty of New Zealand in his films.
    [Show full text]