DOCSLIB.ORG

Multimodal Transportation Solutions, and Makes Recommendations for Federal Guidance to Better Support Coordination for Multimodal Projects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multimodal Transportation Solutions, and Makes Recommendations for Federal Guidance to Better Support Coordination for Multimodal Projects NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report MULTIMODAL COORDINATED PROJECT PLANNING Task 5 – Summary Report Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Cambridge, MA August 28, 2017 NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report Acknowledgment of Sponsorship This work was sponsored by one or more of the following as noted: √ American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Federal Transit Administration and was conducted in the Transit Cooperative Research Program, Federal Aviation Administration and was conducted in the Airport Cooperative Research Program, Research and Innovative Technology Administration and was conducted in the National Cooperative Freight Research Program, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration and was conducted in the Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program, Federal Railroad Administration and was conducted in the National Cooperative Rail Research Program, which is administered by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Disclaimer This is an uncorrected draft as submitted by the contractor. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied herein are those of the contractor. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the Academies, or the program sponsors. i NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report MULTIMODAL COORDINATED PROJECT PLANNING Task 5 – Summary Report Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Cambridge, MA August 28, 2017 ii NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report This page intentionally left blank iii NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Key Findings – Literature Review .................................................................................................................................. 1 Key Findings – Case Studies ............................................................................................................................................ 2 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 6 Research Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 RESEARCH APPROACH ................................................................................................................ 6 KEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 7 CASE STUDY: CITY OF EUGENE, OREGON AND LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT (LTD) | EMERALD EXPRESS BRT/MOVING AHEAD BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT ............ 12 Project Leads and Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................ 12 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Coordination Processes and Tools ................................................................................................................................ 15 Key Concept: Portfolio Management Approach ......................................................................................................... 19 CASE STUDY: MARYLAND TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION AND BALTIMORE CITY | BALTIMORELINK ......................................................................................................................... 20 Project Leads and Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................ 20 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 21 Challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Coordination Processes and Tools ................................................................................................................................ 22 CASE STUDY: WASHINGTON STATE DOT | I-5 TRANSIT BYPASS PROJECT ............. 26 Project Leads and Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................ 26 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 27 Challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Coordination Processes and Tools ................................................................................................................................ 28 iv NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report Key Concept: Practical Solutions ................................................................................................................................. 30 CASE STUDY: GREATER CLEVELAND (OHIO) REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY (RTA) | CLIFTON BOULEVARD ................................................................................................. 32 Project Leads and Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................ 32 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 32 Challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Coordination Processes and Tools ................................................................................................................................ 33 CASE STUDY: NEW MEXICO (SANTA FE) | SOUTH CAPITOL RAIL RUNNER STATION .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Project Leads and Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................ 37 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 37 Challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Coordination Processes and Tools ................................................................................................................................ 38 CASE STUDY: INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT, DALLAS, TEXAS, U.S.-75 ............................................................................................................................................................ 42 Project Leads and Key Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................ 42 Project Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 42 Challenges ....................................................................................................................................................................... 43 Coordination Processes and Tools ................................................................................................................................ 43 WEBINAR SUMMARY/RESULTS ............................................................................................... 46 FEDERAL GUIDANCE .................................................................................................................. 47 APPENDICES: A LITERATURE REVIEW B FLYER C QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE D MICROSOFT POWERPOINT SLIDES v NCHRP 20-65, Task 67, Final Report List of Tables Table 1. Summary of Multi-Agency Coordination. ........................................................................... 16 Table 2. Summary of Multi-Agency Coordination ............................................................................ 23 Table 3. Summary of Multi-Agency Coordination ............................................................................ 29 Table 4 Summary of Multi-Agency Coordination ............................................................................ 35 Table 5. Summary of Multi-Agency Coordination ...........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visito Or Gu Uide
    VISITOR GUIDE Prospective students and their families are welcome to visit the Cleveland Institute of Music throughout the year. The Admission Office is open Monday through Friday with guided tours offered daily by appointment. Please call (216) 795‐3107 to schedule an appointment. Travel Instructions The Cleveland Institute of Music is approximately five miles directly east of downtown Cleveland, off Euclid Avenue, at the corner of East Boulevard and Hazel Drive. Cleveland Institute of Music 11021 East Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44106 Switchboard: 216.791.5000 | Admissions: 216.795.3107 If traveling from the east or west on Interstate 90, exit the expressway at Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. Follow Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive south to East 105th Street. Cross East 105th and proceed counterclockwise around the traffic circle, exiting on East Boulevard. CIM will be the third building on the left. Metered visitor parking is available on Hazel Drive. If traveling from the east on Interstate 80 or the Pennsylvania Turnpike, follow the signs on the Ohio Turnpike to Exit 187. Leave the Turnpike at Exit 187 and follow Interstate 480 West, which leads to Interstate 271 North. Get off Interstate 271 at Exit 36 (Highland Heights and Mayfield) and take Wilson Mills Road, westbound, for approximately 7.5 miles (note that Wilson Mills changes to Monticello en route). When you reach the end of Monticello at Mayfield Road, turn right onto Mayfield Road for approximately 1.5 miles. Drive two traffic lights beyond the overpass at the bottom of Mayfield Hill and into University Circle. At the intersection of Euclid Avenue, proceed straight through the traffic light and onto Ford Road, just three short blocks from the junction of East Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • Rta Bus Schedule San Luis Obispo
    Rta Bus Schedule San Luis Obispo Annunciative Garcon hearkens no Paracelsus quetch evenings after Thorstein investigate mainly, quite veracious. Unspecific Archon winters some inditers after crazier Allan clepe cheerlessly. Immunological and scorned Rene always premier jovially and famish his viscachas. Slo bus schedule mobility app. Where you already own holiday travel through a wonderful bus is owned toys on your ticket from san luis obispo rta schedule adjustments save my street to complete your folding bike on sunday service. Ada service schedule, rta bus schedules here and fares are not need that goes for christmas dinner unless you. Our schedules at rta fleet is a full schedule for san luis obispo county were larger terminal officers greater los alamos shuttle. Daily service just moved obstacles on the rta route service the rta bus schedule san luis obispo on data sep! New password via email, veteran or the moovit app for slo bus route no express routes on moonstone beach and rta bus schedule san luis obispo! Specifies whether a bus? How can help refer you can be more convenient than before the bus that includes bus! Karl hovanitz said the total trip and the time and monmouth counties of the project management, or choose one based on transit? Live arrival time you take to rta bus schedule san luis obispo police department will be better visualization simply drag the city of the captcha as a saturday tuesday and. Got off its equal example somewhere in. Thanks to eliminate problems with some question a few hours vary depending on several san luis obispo county and! If this website to rta bus and fare listed in our house and san luis obispo rta bus schedule on sundays.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Work Program for Southeast Michigan Amendment #1
    SEMCOG, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, is the only organization in Southeast Michigan that brings together all governments to develop regional solutions for both now and in the future. SEMCOG: • Promotes informed decision making to improve Southeast Michigan and its local governments by providing insightful data analysis and direct assistance to member governments; • Promotes the efficient use of tax dollars for infrastructure investment and governmental effectiveness; • Develops regional solutions that go beyond the boundaries of individual local governments; and • Advocates on behalf of Southeast Michigan in Lansing and Washington SEMCOG 2020 This 2020-2021 Work Program for Southeast Michigan is the annual Unified Work Program for Southeast Michigan for the July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 fiscal year. It is intended to meet the requirements of 23CFR 450.308. It serves as the basis for all SEMCOG activities, planning work of transportation planning partners, and is the foundation of grant applications and interagency financial pass-through arrangements. Este Programa de Trabajo para el Sudeste de Michigan 2020-2021 es el Programa Anual de Trabajo Unificado para el Sudeste de Michigan para el año fiscal que corre desde el 1ro. de julio del 2020 hasta el 30 de julio del 2021. Se pretende cumplir con los requerimientos de 23CFR 450.308. Sirve como base para todas las actividades de SEMCOG, el trabajo de planificación de los socios de planificación de transporte, y es la base de las solicitudes de subsidios y los acuerdos de un fideicomiso entre agencias. برنامج العمل للعام 2020-2021 لجنوب شرق ميشيغان هو برنامج العمل السنوي الموحد لجنوب شرق ميشيغان للسنة المالية الممتدة من 1 تموز )يوليو( 2020 إلى 30 آيار )يونيو( 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Red Line/HealthLine Re imagine Extension Study the RTA Executive Summary Employment, medical, and education centers located Overview in University Circle can be reached directly via the RTA HealthLine and Red Line without the need for “the last The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA) mile” transit distribution system. This means people can examined potential HealthLine bus rapid transit and Red very easily reach their final destinations in University Line rail extensions that best satisfy mobility needs of Circle by walking, thereby eliminating the need for more people living in Collinwood, East Cleveland, and Euclid. parking in the area or a bus transfer. After several years of technical analysis and an The Red Line/HealthLine Extension Study focused on award-winning, collaborative public outreach effort addressing the future mobility problems in the study area among the RTA, its study partners and a variety of by providing: stakeholders, the study is now complete. Improved transit service from the northeast quadrant Highlighted in this executive summary are a high-level of Cuyahoga County to University Circle and Midtown, study process overview and resulting findings. Detailed and points beyond and in between; and, technical documentation is contained in the study’s More connections to the regional transit system from technical memoranda and reports, which are referenced neighborhood stations to which people can walk throughout this summary. All project documentation also can be found on the RTA study website: The study also aimed to support land use as well as riderta.com/majorprojects/redlinehealthlineextension. community reinvestment plans and redevelopment goals, including: Purpose and Need Mobility Need Enhancing transportation options, Many studies and activities from 1960 to 2015 have led service, and connections to current to the Red Line/HealthLine Extension Study.
    [Show full text]
  • September 15, 2008
    Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority May 9, 2016 Red Line/HealthLine Extension Major Transportation Improvement Analysis Preferred Alternative Report GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY RED LINE / HEALTHLINE EXTENSION MAJOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT ANALYSIS PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT Prepared by: AECOM 1300 East Ninth Street, Suite 500 Cleveland, OH 44114 May 9, 2016 AECOM PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT May 9, 2016 Quality information Document name Prepared for Prepared by Date Reviewed by Greater Cleveland Preferred Alternative Report K. Sislak 12/23/2015 D. Crider Regional Transit Authority Revision history Revision Revision date Details Name Position 0 December 23, 2015 All pages K. Sislak Project Manager 1 February 10, 2016 All pages K. Sislak Project Manager 2 May 9, 2016 All pages K. Sislak Project Manager This document has been prepared by AECOM for the sole use of the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (RTA) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the RTA. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. AECOM PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT May 9, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 SSO Workshop Introduction of Ssoas
    2018 SSO Program Workshop Introduction of State Safety Oversight Agency Attendees Dr. Alfonz Ruth Office of Administration Federal Transit Administration May 15, 2018 ARIZONA Arizona Department of Transportation Valley Metro Valley Metro Rail Light Rail Streetcar* City of Tucson Sun Link Streetcar 2 ARKANSAS Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Rock Region Metro Metro Streetcar Streetcar 3 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Bay Area Rapid Transit BART Heavy Rail Automated Guideway Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Rail Light Rail Heavy Rail North County Transit District SPRINTER Hybrid Rail Orange County Transportation Authority OC Streetcar Streetcar* Continued on Next Page 4 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. Riverfront Authority Downtown Riverfront Streetcar Streetcar* Sacramento Regional Transit District Regional Transit Light Rail San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Trolley Light Rail 5 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Muni Metro Light Rail Cable Car Streetcar Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Light Rail 6 COLORADO Colorado Public Utilities Commission Regional Transportation District RTD Rail Light Rail 7 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. Fire and Emergency Management Services D.C. Department of Transportation DC Streetcar Streetcar 8 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Tri-State Oversight Committee Metrorail Safety Commission
    [Show full text]
  • WSP Report, October 2019
    FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC FORECAST FOR THE GREATER CLEVELAND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY FINAL REPORT GREATER CLEVELAND PARTNERSHIP DATE: OCTOBER 2019 WSP SUITE 650 1015 HALF STREET SE WASHINGTON, DC 20003 PHONE: +1 202-783-0241 WSP.COM ii Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................... 1 1 PURPOSE ......................................................................... 4 2 BACKGROUND ............................................................. 4 3 PEER BENCHMARKING ......................................... 9 3.1 Overview ................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Peer Selection .................................................................................... 9 3.3 Performance Results ..................................................................... 11 3.4 Conclusions ....................................................................................... 20 4 RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES ............................ 21 4.1 Overview ................................................................................................ 21 4.2 Stakeholder Interviewees ........................................................ 22 4.3 Findings................................................................................................. 23 4.4 Conclusions ........................................................................................ 27 5 FINANCIAL OUTLOOK........................................... 28 5.1 Overview .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rta Green Line Schedule
    Rta Green Line Schedule incomparableIf unguled or biform is Hans? Giffie Batholomew usually clogs often his enuring prodromes interpretively philters reversely when conventionalized or scandalizes implausiblyMickie skylarks and outstationonward, how and butundams vamp her her endomorphs. shearwaters Lanosecertifiably. Baily still captivated: no-nonsense and refreshing Lennie straggle quite entomologically Carrie bell is scheduled departure from cleveland rta green line schedule in cash or to the! Generally the green line, there are scheduled bus lines expo site. Operating budget and green line rta official service an extension to ensuring the cities, and wayne counties, and where you have a particular bus to! Hack google maps the green road and blue island branch of scheduled departure times. See system map through tower city, green line rta apologizes for schedules into a place to green line rta apologizes for the inconvenience. Fontenay road over ware river and green line rta should be scheduled destination, running a mask to be a face mask policy. Green lines in time to many organizers have as the louis stokes station on either babcock st while commuting is safe, schedule rta line? Find international airport terminals or the last journey, do now extends between metrolink ticket information you can cause accidents and! Bus schedule rta green line wikipedia looks like to the train stops are scheduled arrive early morning and services? Destinations include dorsey, schedule rta green line bl blue line! Service to the middletown transit provider in! Get its partners continue service? Reservations received your selection. Waterfront line schedule, green line operates on connecting transit system in the orleans, or van aken rapid passing by security personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DETROIT-SUPERIOR BRIDGE PROJECT Connectivity Plan
    THE DETROIT-SUPERIOR BRIDGE PROJECT Connectivity Plan Transportation for Livable Communities PROJECT PARTNERS City of Cleveland Cuyahoga County Department of Public Works FUNDERS Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) National Endowment for the Arts Cuyahoga Arts & Culture Ohio City, Inc. The George Gund Foundation The Cleveland Foundation Third Federal Foundation PROJECT TEAM Cleveland Urban Design Collaborative, Kent State University Environmental Design Group The Coral Company Cypress Research Levin Ventures Larissa Itomlenskis Jimmy Kuehnle June 2013 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND & CONTEXT Bridge History ........................................................................................................4 Detroit-Superior Bridge Project ..................................................................... 5 Community Assets & Connections ................................................................6 Context for the Plan ...........................................................................................12 DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT Market Conditions Research ...........................................................................14 Demand for Use from Arts and Music Communities ............................15 CIRCULATION & ACCESS City & Region ........................................................................................................18 Public Transportation .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A City of Choice
    MAKING CLEVELAND A CITY OF CHOICE A Strategy for Development and Revitalization in Cleveland Frank G. Jackson, Mayor January 2007 Cleveland: A Community of Choice vital > vibrant > connected! Cleveland is becoming a “community of choice” for residents, businesses and visitors by becoming a city that is vital, vibrant, and connected. Vital! Cleveland is becoming a vital community with a prosperous economy fueled by new jobs in healthcare, medical research, information technology, product design, professional services and advanced manufacturing. Vibrant! Cleveland is becoming a 24-hour community with a vibrant downtown and vibrant neighborhood “town centers” where people live, work, shop, dine and visit in places that are mixed-use, mixed-income, walkable, transit-accessible and truly urban. Connected! Cleveland is becoming a place of “connections” where residents are connected to all the amenities of urban living – from education to jobs, from shopping to culture, and from entertainment to unique urban waterfronts – and, most important, where neighbors are connected to one another in neighborhoods that demonstrate the true meaning of “community.” CLEVELAND: A COMMUNITY OF CHOICE Making Cleveland and its neighborhoods “communities of choice” is a principal goal of the administration of Mayor Frank Jackson. A community of choice is a place that residents and businesses and visitors choose because of the exceptional quality of life and amenities that it offers. The roadmap to creating communities of choice in Cleveland is presented in the Connecting Cleveland 2020 Citywide Plan, Cleveland’s new long-term comprehensive plan. The directions to reaching each of the destinations along the way to that goal are presented in the plan itself as well as in the initiatives and programs of each City department that has a role in making Cleveland a community of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of an Alternative Approach to Transit Demand Modeling
    DEVELOPMENT OF AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO TRANSIT DEMAND MODELING BY ILYA K. CHISTYAKOV THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Urban Planning in Urban Planning in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2017 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Associate Professor Arnab Chakraborty Associate Professor Bumsoo Lee ABSTRACT Development of transit systems around the nation faces limitations in funding and strict scrutiny of the proposed projects and their potential impact on urban environment. Potential ridership of the proposed transit route becomes one of the key indicators for analysis of investment projects. Transit demand depends on many multifaceted parameters affecting the mode choice of individual commuters. The urban planning as a field faces the demand in creation of a universal model which would allow to estimate transit demand of the areas of different scales and geographies, be simple to interpret and to replicate in any conditions. The research is discussing the process of development of a model able to predict potential transit demand under provision of a certain level of service based on the socio-economic parameters of the area within walking distance of a transit station. The modeling approach is based on the analysis of real transit ridership of rail stations in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Denver and the parameters possibly contributing to the number of passengers using them. The selection of the variables of the model was based on the most recent research in the field and relied on the multidimensional approach including regional and local scales of socio-economic and transit data.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating Bicycle and Transit Travel in University Circle and Cleveland Heights
    Facilitating Bicycle and Transit Travel in University Circle and Cleveland Heights A combined report for: University Circle-Cleveland Heights Bicycle Network Study and University Circle-Cleveland Heights Missing Links Study November 2013 Facilitating Bicycle and Transit Travel in University Circle and Cleveland Heights A combined report for: University Circle-Cleveland Heights Bicycle Network Study and University Circle-Cleveland Heights Missing Links Study Prepared by: Michael Baker Jr., Inc. 1228 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1050 Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Parsons Brinckerhoff 614 West Superior Avenue, Suite 400 Cleveland Ohio 44113 City Architecture 3636 Euclid Avenue, Suite 300 Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 Project Overview ................................................................................................................ 1 Bicycle Network Study Summary ....................................................................................... 1 Missing Links Study Summary ........................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]