DOCSLIB.ORG

2017-Nubo-Presentation.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017-Nubo-Presentation.Pdf Background Ryan Whitelaw 17 Year Resident of SCC Degree in Mathematics Commercial Real Estate Appraiser Bike enthusiast Kona Ute Timeline Timeline Timeline Rail-With-Trail Timeline Timeline Rail-Trail vs. Rail-With-Trail Timeline Rail-With-Trail Rail-With-Trail Rail-With-Trail Complications Financial $32 million – Initial Estimate $127 million – MBSST $200+ million – Segment 7 Rail-With-Trail Complications Financial Environmental Rail-With-Trail Complications Financial Environmental Utility USDOT Shared Use Path Study Level of Service (LOS) “A” – Over 4.0 – Excellent “B” – 3.5 to 4.0 – Good “C” – 3.0 to 3.5 – Fair “D” – 2.5 to 3.0 – Poor “E” – 2.0 to 2.5 – Very Poor “F” – Less than 2.0 – Failing Timeline No. System Largest City Served Pop (City) Pop (Metro) Length (miles) 1 Atlanta Streetcar Atlanta 463,878 5,522,942 2.7 2 Baltimore Light Rail Baltimore 620,961 2,797,407 33.0 3 MBTA light rail Boston 667,137 4,628,910 26.0 4 Buffalo Metro Rail Buffalo 258,959 1,134,210 6.4 5 Charlotte Area Transit System Charlotte 809,958 2,380,314 9.6 6 RTA Rapid Transit Cleveland 396,815 2,064,725 15.3 7 DART Dallas 1,300,092 7,102,796 90.0 8 Dallas Streetcar Dallas 1,300,092 7,102,796 1.6 9 Denver RTD Denver 600,158 2,814,330 48.0 10 METRORail Houston 2,099,451 6,313,158 22.7 11 Hudson–Bergen Jersey City / Newark City 541,430 23,723,696 23.3 12 KC Streetcar Kansas City 459,787 2,159,159 2.2 13 Metro Streetcar Little Rock 193,524 724,385 3.4 14 Metro Rail light rail Los Angeles 4,030,904 13,131,431 87.7 15 MATA Trolleys Memphis 646,889 1,341,746 6.3 16 METRO Light Rail Minneapolis-St. Paul 382,578 3,524,583 21.8 17 RTA Streetcars New Orleans 389,617 1,262,888 22.3 18 Tide Light Rail Norfolk 245,428 1,672,319 7.4 19 SPRINTER Oceanside-Escondido 143,911 3,095,313 22.0 20 SEPTA light rail Philadelphia 1,567,442 6,051,170 68.4 21 Valley Metro Rail Phoenix 1,445,632 4,574,531 26.0 22 The T Pittsburgh 304,391 2,360,867 26.2 23 MAX Light Rail Portland 632,309 2,389,228 60.0 24 Portland Streetcar Portland 632,309 2,389,228 7.4 25 Sacramento RT Light Rail Sacramento 466,488 2,149,127 42.9 26 TRAX (UTA) Salt Lake City 186,440 1,153,340 44.8 27 S Line (UTA) Salt Lake City 186,440 1,153,340 2.0 28 San Diego Trolley San Diego 1,394,928 3,095,313 53.5 29 Muni Metro San Francisco 864,816 4,656,132 35.7 30 San Francisco cable cars San Francisco 864,816 4,656,132 5.2 31 Santa Clara VTA Light Rail San Jose 1,015,785 1,976,836 42.2 32 Seattle Streetcar Seattle 608,660 3,733,580 3.8 33 Link Light Rail Seattle/Tacoma 608,660 3,733,580 20.4 34 MetroLink St. Louis 315,685 2,811,588 46.0 35 TECO Line Streetcars Tampa 347,645 2,824,724 2.7 36 River LINE Trenton 84,913 6,034,678 34.0 37 Sun Link Tucson 520,116 1,010,025 3.9 38 DC Streetcar Washington, D.C. 672,228 6,097,684 2.4 Averages 743,981 4,088,111 25.8 - - Santa Cruz 59,946 262,382 - Light Rail Projects - Population City Metro Average 743,981 4,088,111 Santa Cruz 59,946 262,382 Timeline Railbanking “Railbanking is a method by which corridors that would otherwise be abandoned can be preserved for future rail use through interim conversion to a trail.” – Rails to Trails Conservancy The RTC wants to ensure that this corridor is preserved for the community’s transportation purposes. Conclusion Urban planning based on the car Need to shift motorists to cleaner, healthier travel Critical to shift, is high quality infrastructure Urban planning based on the car Conclusion Need to shift motorists to cleaner, healthier travel Critical to shift, is high quality infrastructure What can you do? Sign the GSCT petition Spread the word Take UCIS survey Write RTC Organize a meeting Speak at RTC meeting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Innovation. Technology. Performance. for the URBAN RAIL COMMUNITY
    Smart cities Tram-trains Ticketing Power Traction CBTC Train control Technology Mobility Telecommunications Innovation Innovation. Driverless Infrastructure Passenger Information Asset management FOR THE URBAN RAIL COMMUNITY Technology. Performance. www.terrapinn.com/railliveamericas Organized by Our Story Hall of Fame Revamped for the new year, RAIL Live! Americas 2019 is moving to Baltimore’s Inner Harbor as we build on the success of World MetroRail Congress Americas 2018, which continued our strong tradition of bringing together top leaders from the Americas’ most influential and innovative transit agencies. Andy Byford Jim Kenney 2018 leaders included Kevin Desmond, CEO of TransLink, Edward Reiskin, President Mayor Director of Transportation for the SFMTA, Jim Kenney, Mayor, City of Philadelphia New York City Transit City of Philadelphia Tom Gerend, Executive Director of KC Streetcar, Robert Puentes, President & CEO of the Eno Center for Transportation, Martin Buck, International Lead for Crossrail in London, and Lorenzo Aguilar Camelo, the General Director of Metrorrey in Monterrey, Mexico. KEY INDUSTRY DISCUSSIONS FOR 2019 WILL BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR Jascha Franklin-Hodge Bill Zebrowski Chief Information Officer BRAND NEW TRACKS: Chief Information Officer Department of Innovation & SEPTA • The Future of Mobility: Discussions around Mobility as a Service, Fare Collection, Technology, City of Boston Intermodality, Ridership, Passenger Information Systems, and First and Last Mile transport. • New Project Development: Examining Funding and Financing, Public-Private Partnerships, Procurement, Designing and Building New Metros, Light Rails, Commuter, and High-Speed Rail Lines. Meera Joshi Adam Giambrone NYC Taxi and Limousine Director, Brooklyn-Queens • Train Control: Covering ATC, CBTC, PTC, as well as the Full Spectrum of Commission Connector [Streetcars and LRT] Modernizing Signaling and Train Control Systems to Increase Safety and Capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail Transit (LRT)
    Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Visito Or Gu Uide
    VISITOR GUIDE Prospective students and their families are welcome to visit the Cleveland Institute of Music throughout the year. The Admission Office is open Monday through Friday with guided tours offered daily by appointment. Please call (216) 795‐3107 to schedule an appointment. Travel Instructions The Cleveland Institute of Music is approximately five miles directly east of downtown Cleveland, off Euclid Avenue, at the corner of East Boulevard and Hazel Drive. Cleveland Institute of Music 11021 East Boulevard Cleveland, OH 44106 Switchboard: 216.791.5000 | Admissions: 216.795.3107 If traveling from the east or west on Interstate 90, exit the expressway at Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive. Follow Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive south to East 105th Street. Cross East 105th and proceed counterclockwise around the traffic circle, exiting on East Boulevard. CIM will be the third building on the left. Metered visitor parking is available on Hazel Drive. If traveling from the east on Interstate 80 or the Pennsylvania Turnpike, follow the signs on the Ohio Turnpike to Exit 187. Leave the Turnpike at Exit 187 and follow Interstate 480 West, which leads to Interstate 271 North. Get off Interstate 271 at Exit 36 (Highland Heights and Mayfield) and take Wilson Mills Road, westbound, for approximately 7.5 miles (note that Wilson Mills changes to Monticello en route). When you reach the end of Monticello at Mayfield Road, turn right onto Mayfield Road for approximately 1.5 miles. Drive two traffic lights beyond the overpass at the bottom of Mayfield Hill and into University Circle. At the intersection of Euclid Avenue, proceed straight through the traffic light and onto Ford Road, just three short blocks from the junction of East Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • TCRP Report 52: Joint Operation of Light Rail Transit Or Diesel Multiple
    APPENDIX A Key FRA Regulations (Affecting Joint Use) The following is a listing of key FRA specifications. This listing is intended as a regulations taken from the Code of Federal general identification of the operative code Regulations (49 CFR 200-299), Federal sections, along with a general description Railroad Administration, that may affect of the requirements. This identification joint operation of light rail transit or diesel code section should not imply or impute multiple unit vehicles with railroads. The that the code provision will need to be selected regulations concern operational modified to operate light rail transit or procedures, standards, and certain design DMU with railroads. Regulation Number and Section Comment §209: Railroad Safety Enforcement Policy procedures for assessing Procedures penalties and for appealing penalties. Also includes, fitness-for-duty and follow-up on FRA recommendations. §210: Railroad Noise Emission Covers total sound emitted by moving Compliance Regulations rail cars and locomotives. Does not apply to: • Steam engines; • Street, suburban, or interurban electric railways, unless operated as a part of the general railroad system of transportation; • Sound emitted by warning devices such as horns, whistles, or bells when operated for the purpose of safety; • Special-purpose equipment that may be located on or operated from rail cars. §211: Rules of Practice Subpart C - Rules of practice that apply to Waivers rulemaking and waiver proceedings, review of emergency orders issued §211.41: Processing of petitions for under 45 U.S.C. 432, and miscellaneous waiver of safety rules safety-related proceedings and informal safety inquiries. Page A-1 Regulation Number and Section Comment §212: State Safety Participation Establishes standards and procedures for Regulations State participation in investigative and surveillance activities under Federal railroad safety laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Payment Ordinance
    Proof of Payment Ordinance BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OCTOBER 26, 2017 What is Proof of Payment? 2 Proof of Payment means that passengers must present valid fare media, anywhere in the paid area of the system, upon request by authorized transit personnel. Why Proof of Payment 3 Estimated Revenue Annual Loss: $15M - $25M At least $6M loss supported by data Another $9M - $19M likely Currently, enforcement can only occur at “barrier” locations BPD must directly observe OR Employee or rider must: Witness and be willing to place offender under Citizens Arrest and BPD must be nearby and Offender must be contacted In short, without proof of payment, fare evaders are only concerned at the brief moments when they are sneaking in or out 3 Who Else Uses Proof of Payment? 4 California Other States SMART Dallas Area Rapid Transit Baltimore Light Rail San Francisco MTA Buffalo Metro Rail Santa Clara VTA Charlotte LYNX Cleveland Red Line Heavy Rail Sacramento RTA St. Louis Metro Link Seattle Sounder Commuter Rail and Central Los Angeles MTA Link Light Rail ACE Portland Tri-Met NJ Transit Hudson Bergen & River Lines Caltrain Houston Metro Rail San Diego Trolley Denver RTD Rail Who Uses BOTH Proof of Payment & Station Barriers? 5 SEPTA Philadelphia City Center stations Los Angeles MTA Purple and Red Lines Greater Cleveland RTA Red Line Montreal Metro BC Transit, Vancouver SkyTrain Proof of Payment Protocol 6 Inspections will be fair and non-biased. Police Officers and/or CSO’s will perform inspections within the paid area of the stations and on board non-crowded trains.
    [Show full text]
  • City Response to DART Downtown Transit Study
    Oak Cliff Gateway Community Meeting TIGER Streetcar Project Update Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects TIGER Streetcar Project Initial Dallas streetcar planning efforts grew out of CBD Comprehensive Transportation Plan and D2 light rail analysis Focused within downtown loop NCTCOG received a grant on behalf of the City of Dallas from the Federal Transit Administration for the streetcar starter line to serve the CBD and North Oak Cliff workforce The 1.6 mile base project runs from Union Station to Methodist Hospital at a cost of approximately $48.6M including vehicles $26M in federal funding $12.8M in local funding (Regional Toll-road Revenue) $9M from DART for vehicles 2 TIGER Streetcar Project 3 TIGER Streetcar Project Stacey and Witbeck/Carcon were given notice to proceed with final design and construction in September 2012 and bridge demolition is currently underway Base project has been enhanced to provide double track operation along Zang and Colorado Completion of base project is scheduled for October 2014 Brookville Equipment Corporation was given notice to proceed with production of two vehicles in March 2013 First American made off-wire modern streetcar vehicle The Dallas streetcar will be 8’ wide, 66.5’ long with capacity to carry 41 passenger seated and maximum 170 standees Anticipated vehicle delivery is late summer 2014 4 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension The Regional Transportation Council (RTC) recently reprogrammed $30.87M in Texas Mobility Funds to the Dallas Streetcar Project The funds are proposed to extend the base project an additional 1.25 miles and provide two additional vehicles .75 miles south from Methodist Hospital to the Bishop Arts District ($15M) .5 miles north to the Dallas Convention Center/Omni Hotel ($7.87M) Streetcar Vehicles ($8M) 5 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension 6 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension Operation and Maintenance Cost Operation for base Streetcar Project funded by Dallas Area Rapid Transit Base project assumes weekday service only 5:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
    METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Participants
    CONGRESS PARTICIPANTS "COMPAGNIA TRASPORTI LAZIALI" SOCIETÀ REGIONALE S.P. A. Italy 9292 - REISINFORMATIEGROEP B.V. Netherlands AB STORSTOCKHOLMS LOKALTRAFIK - STOCKHOLM PUBLIC TRANSPORT Sweden AB VOLVO Sweden ABB SCHWEIZ AG Switzerland ABG LOGISTICS Nigeria ABU DHABI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT United Arab Emirates ACCENTURE Germany ACCENTURE Finland ACCENTURE Canada ACCENTURE Singapore ACCENTURE BRAZIL Brazil ACCENTURE BRISBANE Australia ACCENTURE SAS France ACTIA AUTOMOTIVE France ACTV SOCIETÀ PER AZIONI Italy ADDAX- ASSESORIA FINANCEIRA Brazil ADNKRONOS Italy ADV SPAZIO SRL Italy AESYS - RWH INTL. LTD Germany AGENCE BELGA Belgium AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE France AGENCE METROPOLITAINE DE TRANSPORT Canada AGENZIA CAMPANA PER LA MOBILITÀ SOSTENIBILE Italy AGENZIA ESTE NEWS Italy AGENZIA MOBILITA E AMBIENTE E TERRITORIO S.R.L. Italy AGENZIA PER LA MOBILITÀ ED IL TRASPORTO PUBBLICO LOCALE DI MODENA S.P.A. Italy AGETRANSP Brazil AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GMBH Austria AJUNTAMENT DE BARCELONA Spain AKERSHUS FYLKESKOMMUNE - AKERSHUS COUNTY COUNCIL Norway AL AHRAME Egypt AL FAHIM United Arab Emirates AL FUTTAIM MOTORS United Arab Emirates AL RAI MEDIA GROUP-AL RAI NEWSPAPER Kuwait ALBERT - LUDWIGS - UNIVERSITÄT FREIBURG INSTITUT FÜR VERKEHRSWISSENSCH Germany ALCOA WHEEL AND TRANSPORTATION PRODUCTS Hungary ALEXANDER DENNIS LIMITED United Kingdom ALEXANDER DENNIS Ltd United Kingdom ALLINNOVE Canada ALMATY METRO Kazakhstan ALMATYELECTROTRANS Kazakhstan ALMAVIVA SPA Italy ALSTOM France ALSTOM MAROC S.A. Morocco AMBIENTE EUROPA Italy AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION USA ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION India APAM ESERCIZIO S.P.A. Italy ARAB UNION OF LAND TRANSPORT Jordan AREA METROPOLITANA DE BARCELONA Spain AREP VILLE France ARIA TRANSPORT SERVICES USA ARRIVA (ESSA ALDOSARI) United Arab Emirates ARRIVA ITALIA S.R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2018 Business Plan
    Dallas Area Rapid Transit FY 2018 BUSINESS PLAN Including FY 2018 Annual Budget and Twenty-Year Financial Plan FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 1 7/31/17 9:40 AM DART BOARD MEMBERS Sue Bauman Dallas Catherine Cuellar Dallas and Cockrell Hill Mark C. Enoch Garland, Rowlett and Glenn Heights Tim A. Hayden Carrollton and Irving Ray Jackson Dallas Jonathan R. Kelly Garland Patrick Kennedy Dallas Jon-Bertrell Killen Dallas Michele Wong Krause Dallas Amanda Moreno Dallas Gary Slagel Richardson, University Park, Addison and Highland Park Rick Stopfer Irving Dominique Torres Dallas Paul N. Wageman Plano Faye Moses Wilkins Plano and Farmers Branch FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 2 7/31/17 9:40 AM FY 2018 Business Plan (09/26/17) How to Use This Book What’s in this Book This book contains the Business Plan for Fiscal Year 2018 (FY 2018 – which ends September 30, 2018) for Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART or the Agency). The Business Plan provides the DART Board of Directors, customers, taxpayers, elected officials, and other stakeholder groups of our region with a comprehensive summary of the Agency's plans and commitments to improve regional mobility, enhance the quality of life, and stimulate economic development. This document consolidates the key elements of the FY 2018 Annual Budget, the FY 2018 Twenty-Year Financial Plan, the Transit System Plan, and the Agency's Strategic Plan. A summary of the information contained in the various sections follows. The formal Letter of Transmittal summarizes priorities and issues for the upcoming year. The section titled Who We Are should help those not familiar with DART to understand the basis from which the Agency operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Syracuse Transit System Analysis
    Syracuse Transit System Analysis Prepared For: NYSDOT CENTRO Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council January 2014 The I‐81 Challenge Syracuse Transit System Analysis This report has been prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Prudent Engineering In coordination with: Central New York Regional Transportation Authority (CENTRO) Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council The I‐81 Challenge Executive Summary of the Syracuse Transit System Analysis I. Introduction The Syracuse Transit System Analysis (STSA) presents a summary of the methodology, evaluation, and recommendations that were developed for the transit system in the Syracuse metropolitan area. The recommendations included in this document will provide a public transit system plan that can be used as a basis for CENTRO to pursue state and federal funding sources for transit improvements. The study has been conducted with funding from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) through The I‐81 Challenge study, with coordination from CENTRO, the Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council (SMTC), and through public outreach via The I‐81 Challenge public participation plan and Study Advisory Committee (SAC). The recommendations included in this system analysis are based on a combination of technical analyses (alternatives evaluation, regional modeling), public survey of current transit riders and non‐riders/former riders, meetings with key community representatives, and The I‐81 Challenge public workshops. The STSA is intended to serve as a long‐range vision that is consistent with the overall vision of the I‐81 corridor being developed as part of The I‐81 Challenge. The STSA will present a series of short‐term, mid‐term, and long‐ term recommendations detailing how the Syracuse metropolitan area’s transit system could be structured to meet identified needs in a cost‐effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • KC JAZZ STREETCAR ROLLS out for DEBUT the 2021 Art in the Loop KC Streetcar Reveal Set for 4 P.M
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 24, 2021 Media Contact: Donna Mandelbaum, KC Streetcar Authority, 816.627.2526 or 816.877.3219 KC JAZZ STREETCAR ROLLS OUT FOR DEBUT The 2021 Art in the Loop KC Streetcar Reveal Set for 4 p.m. Friday. (Kansas City, Missouri) – The sound of local jazz will fill Main Street as the KC Streetcar debuts its latest streetcar wrap in collaboration with Art in the Loop. Around 4 p.m., Friday, June 25., the 2021 Art in the Loop KC “Jazz” Streetcar will debut at the Union Station Streetcar stop located at Pershing and Main Street. In addition to art on the outside of the KC Streetcar, the inside of the streetcar will feature live performances from percussionist Tyree Johnson and Deremé Nskioh on bass guitar. “We are so excited to debut this very special KC Streetcar wrap,” Donna Mandelbaum, communications director with the KC Streetcar Authority said. “This is our fourth “art car” as part of the Art in the Loop program and each year the artists of Kansas City continue to push the boundaries on how to express their creativity on a transit vehicle.” Jazz: The Resilient Spirit of Kansas City was created by Hector E. Garcia, a local artist and illustrator. Garcia worked for Hallmark Cards for many years as an artist and store merchandising designer. As a freelance illustrator, he has exhibited his “Faces of Kansas City Jazz” caricature collections in Kansas City jazz venues such as the Folly Theater and the Gem Theater. In addition to being an artist, Garcia enjoys Kansas City Jazz – both listening to it and playing it on his guitar.
    [Show full text]