DOCSLIB.ORG

2014-IPMBA-IACP-Bike-Patrol-Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014-IPMBA-IACP-Bike-Patrol-Policy BICYCLE PATROL Model Policy Effective Date Number April 2014 Subject Bicycle Patrol Reference Special Instructions Distribution Reevaluation Date No. Pages 3 I. PURPOSE ically afforded by a motor vehicle would It is the purpose of this policy to provide guidance on be dangerous. Response to such situa - the use, utility, and deployment of police bicycles and tions may be permitted where exigent the general management of police bicycle operations. 1 circumstances exist and motorized units are not readily available, or as back up where patrol vehicles are already on II. POLICY scene. Bicycle patrol officers, also referred to as police c. Police cyclists may be used for targeted cyclists, are an important component of this depart - patrol operations based on specific crimes, ment’s strategy for accomplishing its enforcement geographic areas, or crime targets. objectives due to their mobility and stealth, as well as d. Police cyclists may be given preference their ability to facilitate a variety of law enforcement where appropriate in response to the fol - and crime prevention operations. lowing: (1) Off-road emergencies, to include search and rescue, enforcement, and preventive III. PROCEDURES patrol as required on trails designated A. Deployment for nature walks; mountain bike use; 1. Police bicycles are intended for and their use is horses; and/or walking, hiking, and bik - authorized to conduct the following primary ing. deployment functions: (2) Medical emergencies, if police cyclists a. Police cyclists may be dispatched to or may are properly equipped and trained, and initiate response to all calls for service in if their proximity and/or response time which their response time is comparable to to the incident may be advantageous. or better than that of a motorized patrol (3) Incidents in which the location or the vehicle, unless otherwise indicated by this volume of vehicle and/or pedestrian policy. traffic may inhibit the response of police b. Police cyclists should not normally be dis - motor vehicles. patched or initiate response to incidents in (4) Special events, such as parades, festivals, which their reduced emergency equipment fairs, runs/races, sports, and other capabilities (e.g., emergency warning indoor and outdoor events. devices) may present service problems or (5) Demonstrations, events that attract pro - dangers. These include but are not limited testors, and other crowd situations. to (6) Disaster situations in which movement (1) traffic accidents in which a vehicle is not by conventional motorized emergency moveable; response vehicles is limited or impossi - (2) high-risk felony motor vehicle stops; and ble. (3) situations in which the lack of cover typ - e. Police cyclists may initiate traffic stops, giv - prisoner. ing particular attention to motorist and offi - (1) A police cyclist shall not secure a prison - cer safety. er to an object and leave him or her unat - (1) Physical contact with a moving vehicle is tended, unless an emergency exists that not recommended unless exigent or requires immediate action by the police related emergency circumstances dictate. cyclist. (2) Police bicycles should be kept out of traf - (2) The police cyclist shall respond to the fic and should not be positioned in front appropriate facility to process the of or behind the stopped vehicle. When arrestee at the earliest convenience or in possible, the bicycle should be placed on accordance with normal procedure. the ground next to the vehicle. h. When leaving bicycles unattended, police (3) Bicycle patrol officers are encouraged to cyclists shall, whenever possible, do the fol - make passenger side approaches and to lowing: utilize available cover when present. (1) Secure their bicycles with a locking (4) Marked patrol units should be requested device to an immovable stationary object where appropriate to provide emergency in an easily monitored location unless lighting and cover from traffic. engaged in emergency situations, such as 2. The deployment of police cyclists is subject to foot pursuits, that preclude this require - the following procedures. ment. a. Prior to initiating bicycle patrol, police (2) Take reasonable precautions to ensure cyclists shall inspect their equipment to that the bicycle does not obstruct pedes - ensure that it is in proper working order. If trian or vehicular traffic. a problem is discovered that the police i. If minor damage to the bicycle is sustained cyclist cannot fix, notice shall be given to during the shift, the police cyclist shall noti - the shift supervisor. fy the shift supervisor by the end of the b. Police cyclists and supervisors shall exer - shift. If substantial damage to the bike or cise discretion in determining whether or injury to the officer or a civilian is sus - not to use a bicycle on patrol when exces - tained, the bicycle patrol officer shall imme - sively high or low temperatures or other diately notify the shift supervisor and weather conditions may make the use of request appropriate medical assistance. bicycles inadvisable or hazardous. j. When not in use, all police bicycle equipment c. While operating a bicycle, bicycle patrol shall be stored and locked in the designated officers should wear an approved helmet, area. shatter-resistant protective eyewear, and 3. Police cyclists shall utilize their department cycling gloves and utilize approved pedal bicycles for off-duty assignments only with a retention devices. commander’s prior approval. d. While patrolling at night, unless employing B. Personnel Selection stealth, police cyclists should use lights that 1. In order to reduce the risk of exercise-induced meet the legal mandate or current standard medical problems, pre-screening of candidates for public safety cycling, whichever is is recommended. greater, and any legally mandated reflective 2. Any physical fitness testing should be conduct - equipment and high-visibility attire. ed by a qualified fitness and/or medical pro - e. Whenever possible, police cyclists should fessional. give an audible warning of their approach C. Training from the rear, maintain reasonable speeds, 1. Selected officers must attend and pass a nation - and exercise caution when patrolling on ally recognized and standardized basic police sidewalks and other locations where pedes - cycling course. trians are present. They should not operate 2. Advanced and specialty training is authorized where prohibited by local ordinance, unless only for those who have attended the standard emergency circumstances dictate other - basic course and who demonstrate above-aver - wise. age competency. All advanced and specialized f. When possible, police cyclists shall notify training shall be authorized in accordance with communications of all potential enforce - the department selection application policy ment contacts, to include their exact loca - and as dictated by operational objectives. tion. 3. Documented, periodic training is required; g. In arrest situations, police cyclists shall quarterly training is highly recommended. request a motorized transport unit for the Training can be refresher to advanced, as deter - 2 mined by the unit supervisor in conjunction with a qualified instructor. Acknowledgment 4. Any bike officer who is absent from bike patrol This document was developed by the IACP National for an extended period should be evaluated by Law Enforcement Policy Center in cooperation with the a qualified instructor. Based upon the instruc - International Police Mountain Bike Association (IPMBA) tor’s assessment, refresher training ranging and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). from an 8-hour course to a 32-hour course should be provided. Every effort has been made by the IACP National Law Enforcement Policy Center staff and advisory board to ensure that this model policy incorporates the IV. PERSONNEL RESPONSIBILITIES most current information and contemporary professional judgment on this issue. However, law enforcement administrators should be cautioned that no “model” A. Bicycle Unit Supervisor policy can meet all the needs of any given law enforcement agency. Each law The unit supervisor shall oversee recruitment, pre- enforcement agency operates in a unique environment of federal court rulings, state laws, local ordinances, regulations, judicial and administrative decisions and col - qualification, training (initial and ongoing), lective bargaining agreements that must be considered. In addition, the formulation cycling standards, uniforms and equipment, main - of specific agency policies must take into account local political and community tenance, and deployment. The unit supervisor perspectives and customs, prerogatives and demands; often divergent law enforce - ment strategies and philosophies; and the impact of varied agency resource capa - shall ensure the following: bilities among other factors. 1. All bicycle-mounted operations are conducted in accordance with this policy. 2. All prospective bicycle unit members complete the screening process and are selected accord - This project was supported by Grant No. 2010-DJ-BX-K002 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of Justice Assistance is a component of the ing to the established criteria. Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the 3. Bicycle patrol officers sign for, maintain, and National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, the Office for Victims of Crime, and the Office of Sex Offender are held accountable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ordinance No. 3418 an Ordinance Amending The
    ORDINANCE NO. 3418 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA, CHAPTER 29, TITLED “MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC” BY AMENDING ARTICLE I, “IN GENERAL,” SECTION 29-1, “DEFINITIONS,” BY REVISING THE DEFINITION OF “BICYCLE, ELECTRIC-ASSISTED BICYCLE AND MOTORIZED BICYCLE,” ADDING NEW DEFINITIONS FOR THE TERMS “MOPED,” “MOTOR SCOOTER OR MOTORIZED SCOOTER,” AND “MOTOR-DRIVEN CYCLE”; AMENDING ARTICLE VII “BICYCLES AND MOTORIZED SCOOTERS, BY RENAMING IT “BICYCLES AND NON-LICENSED ELECTRIC AND MOTORIZED PERSONAL CONVEYANCES”; AMENDING SECTION 29-201, GENERALLY AND SECTION 29-211 RIDING ON SIDEWALKS; AMENDING ARTICLE VIII “MOTORCYCLES AND MOTOR SCOOTERS” BY RENAMING IT “MOTORCYCLES, MOTOR-DRIVEN CYCLES, AND MOPEDS”; AMENDING SECTION 29-222, REQUIRED EQUIPMENT; AMENDING SECTION 29-223, CLINGING TO VEHICLES, DELETING SECTION 29-224, HANLDEBARS; AMENDING SECTION 29-225 PASSING BETWEEN LANES; AMENDING SECTION 29-226 RIDING ON SIDEWALKS; AMENDING SECTION 29-227, HEADGEAR; DELETING SECTION 29-228 RESTRICTION ON TIME OF OPERATION; AND AMENDING SECTION 29-229 SPECIAL SPEED LIMITATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STILLWATER, OKLAHOMA: Section 1. That Stillwater City Code, Chapter29, titled “Motor Vehicles and Traffic,” Article I, “In General,” Section 29-1, “Definitions,” be and the same is now amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I. - IN GENERAL Sec. 29-1. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, or as more recently defined in Title 47, Oklahoma Statutes, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Authorized emergency vehicles, equipment means: (1) When equipped as prescribed in subsection (2) of this definition: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicycle Master Plan
    Bicycle Master Plan City of Moreno Valley November 2014 Acknowledgements This Bicycle Master Plan was prepared for the City of Moreno Valley under the guidance of: Senior Engineer/Project Manager Michael Lloyd, P.E. City Traffic Engineer Eric Lewis, P.E., T.E. Additional input was provided by participants at three community workshops and respon- dents via the project online survey. Prepared by KTU+A Planning + Landscape Architecture Principal Mike Singleton, AICP-CTP, ASLA, LEED AP P roject Manager/Planner John Holloway, ASLA, LEED Green Associate, LCI M obility Planners Joe Punsalan, GISP, PTP, LCI Alison Moss Facility planning and transportation engineering support provided by IBI Group Inc. Associate/Transportation Planner Bill Delo, AICP Transportation Planner Matt Redmond This project was funded by a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Community Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant. Table of Contents City of Moreno Valley • Bicycle Master Plan Executive Summary iii 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope 2 1.2 Study Area 2 1.3 Benefits of Cycling 4 1.4 Methodology 6 1.5 Bicycle Facility Types 7 1.6 Bicycle Facility State of Practice 16 1.7 Applicable Legislation 18 2 Existing Conditions and Analysis 2.1 Existing Plans 21 2.2 Existing Facilities and Programs 26 2.3 Trip Origins and Destinations 28 2.4 Transit Connections 34 2.5 Safety Analysis 39 2.6 Opportunities and Constraints Summary 47 3 Recommendations 3.1 Recommended Goals, Policies and Objectives 53 3.2 Recommended Facilities 54 3.3 Future Opportunities 71 3.4 Improvements
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise, Fall and Rebirth of Bicycle Police by Ross D. Petty Babson College Babson Park, MA 02457 USA [email protected]
    The Rise, Fall and Rebirth of Bicycle Police by Ross D. Petty Babson College Babson Park, MA 02457 USA [email protected] © Copyright 2006 Ross D. Petty. All Rights Reserved. The Rise, Fall and Rebirth of Bicycle Police Introduction The concept of police patrolling originated in England in 1818, after private rewards failed to deter crime and people were outraged when troops were called into Manchester to quell a civil disturbance and left 11 people dead. Sir Robert Peel introduced the Metropolitan Police Act of 1829, which set up metropolitan police districts, staffed by paid constables (Trojanowicz et. al., 1998). These “Bobbies” (nicknamed in honor of Sir Peel) were on duty 14-17 hours of the day and often patrolled 20 miles a day for weeks on foot without a day off. To verify their diligence, early constables had to leave a ticket at a designated home on the farthest point of their patrol. Boston developed a similar paid night patrol in 1801 and in 1804 Detroit appointed its first team of civilian police officers. In 1844, New York City was the first American city to model its police department after the principals in Peel’s law that included offering service to all members of the public and maintaining a good relationship with the public (http://www.leineshideaway.com/PoliceHistory.html). Riots in many major U.S. cities from the 1830s through 1850s led to the formation of police departments in virtually every major U.S. city by the mid-1860s (Trojanowicz et. al., 1998). The Rise of Bicycle Use In the 1860s, the earliest pedal bicycles made of iron and wood called boneshakers appeared.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Enforcement Cycling: a Resource Guide to Program Implementation
    NOTICE: This document may be protected by U.S. Copyright Law. This PDF is provided for individual research purposes only. Further distribution is not permitted without author consent. Law Enforcement Cycling: A Resource Guide to Program Implementation By Jesse Patrick Poole Western Oregon University A thesis submitted to Western Oregon University In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in Criminal Justice August 2011 © 2011 by Jesse Patrick Poole NOTICE: This document may be protected by U.S. Copyright Law. This PDF is provided for individual research purposes only. Further distribution is not permitted without author consent. Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements……………………………………………..………........ iv List of Tables ………………………………………………….……………. v List of Figures ………………………………………………………….…… v Abbreviations…………………………………………..……………………. vi Notable Resources…………………………………………………………... vii Abstract ………………………………………………………….………….. ix Part One………………………………………………………………………..…….. 1 Introduction ………………………………………………….……...…….… 1 History ………………………………………………….…………………… 2 Comparative Looks………………………………………………….….…... 4 Motorcycles……………………………………………………….… 4 Horses…………………………………………………………….…. 7 Vehicles………………………………………………………….….. 11 Potential Benefits………………………………………………………….… 12 Extended Maneuverability……………………………………….…. 12 Resourcefulness……………………………………………………... 13 Community Crime Prevention Oriented ……………………….…… 15 Eco-Friendly……………………………………………………..….. 17 Cost Efficiency………………………………………………..…….. 18 Examples of Successful Implementation…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan
    2011 University of Utah Bicycle Master Plan PREPARED BY: Alta Planning + Design and Psomas PREPARED FOR: University of Utah Facilities Department Cory Higgins Director for Plant Operations John McNary Director for Campus Design & Construction Michael G. Perez Associate Vice President for Facilities Management Gordon Wilson Assistant Vice President for Auxiliary Services Alma Allred Director for Commuter Services Tami Cleveland Project Manager - Campus Planner Joseph Harman Campus Design & Construction Manager Chad Larsen Commuter Services Bicycle Manager Ray Wheeler Assoc. Director for Space Planning and Management Myron Willson Director for Office of Sustainability Robert Miles Utah Department of Transportation - Region 2 Tom Millar Mayor's Bicycle Advisory Committee Chad Mullins Salt Lake County Bicycle Advisory Committee Lisa Pascadlo - Detective Salt Lake City Police - Bicycle Liaison Becka Roolf Salt Lake City Transportation Julianne Sabula UTA - Engineering and Construction Planner Lynette Seebohm University of Utah Health Care - Asst. V.P. Garth Smith University of Utah Police Department Steve Panish University of Utah Health Sciences – Asst. V.P. Charles Evans Director for Research Park This Page Intentionally Left Blank 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Goals & Objectives........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Cycling Conference 2010
    Australian Cycling Conference 2010 Proceedings of the Second Australian Cycling Conference Australian Cycling Conference and The University of Adelaide Australian Cycling Conference 2010 Proceedings of the second Australian Cycling Conference Jennifer Bonham and Peter Lumb EDITORS Australian Cycling Conference and The University of Adelaide Adelaide SA 5005, Australia Conference sponsors Organising committee Fay Patterson Jeremy Miller Peter Lumb Stu Clement (Convenor) Jennifer Bonham Editors Jennifer Bonham Peter Lumb Australian Cycling Conference C/- Geographical & Environmental Studies The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia 5005 © Copyright The copyright of papers reproduced in this volume but previously published in Road and Transport Research is reserved by the Australian Road Research Board. The copyright for all other papers in this volume is reserved by the authors. Published: December 2010 ISBN: 978-0-646-54740-4 ACC Logo: Ian Radbone Cover and book design: Chloe Smith Contents Contents Page Preface iii Jennifer Bonham and Peter Lumb Representations of cycling in metropolitan newspapers – Changes over time and differences between Sydney and Melbourne, Australia 1 Chris Rissel, Catriona Bonfiglioli, Adrian Emilsen, Ben J Smith Limitations on the use of the term ‘cyclist’ to describe people who ride bicycles 11 Russell Greig The disruptive traveller? A Foucauldian analysis of cycleways 15 Jennifer Bonham, Peter Cox Cycling to school 29 Leon Arundell The application of a naturalistic driving method to investigate on-road
    [Show full text]
  • BICYCLE SURVEY Abstract
    BICYCLE SURVEY Abstract: Background report on bicycle use in America and Europe as a basis ·forformulation of an EPA policy on bicycle use. Office of Planning and Evaluation Environmental Protection Agency August, 1973 900-011 'C -. Acknowledgements Several persons outside of EPA have contributed inordinate efforts to recommend sources for this report and to review the preliminary draft. Marie Birnbaum of the DOT Office of the Assistant secretary of Transportation for Environment, Safety and Consumer Affairs (TES) and Cary Shaw of the Washington Area Bicycle Association contributed invaluable information without which the report research would have been impossible within the time constraints. In addition, John Cummins of Federal Highway Administration's Office of Chief Counsel, Steve Charnovitz of DOT's TES, and Vince Dearage of the Urban Bikeway Design Competition were instrumental in review and comment of the draft report. Their cooperation and assistance has been greatly appreciated~ · ~. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Summary 1 II. Introduction III. General Use in America 9 A. Some Statistics--Market Data B•. Ownership ·C. Use Patterns 1. Types of Users 2. Urban work Trip--Potentials 3. An Economic Appraisal of Bicycle Commuting IV. The Cycling Environment 20 A. Incentives 1. Energy/Efficiency and Savings 2. Health/Recreational Opportunities 3. Other Contributing Factors B. Disincentives 1. Personal Safety 2. Exposure to Pollutants 3. Bicycle Security C. Support Facilities V. Federal Posture 44 A. Existing Federal programs and Policies 1. Environmental Protection Agency 2. Department of Transportation 3. Department of Interior 4. Consumer Products Safety Commission 5. Council on Environmental Quality 6. Other Federal Activities B.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Recommended Supporting Programs and Facilities
    6. RECOMMENDED SUPPORTING PROGRAMS AND FACILITIES Support programs and facilities are important components of a bicycle transportation system. Bikeway facilities alone are not sufficient to increase cycling. The cycling environment can be improved by providing cyclists places to store their bicycles, showering and changing facilities at work, bicycle racks on buses, directional signage intended for cyclists, route maps, and educational and encouragement programs. Programs such as bikeway management and maintenance, and promotional and educational programs can improve safety and convenience for cyclists, and help to create the cultural shift that is necessary to increase bicycling. The City of Lafayette is a limited services city with a narrowly defined mission statement and a limited staff to provide only the very basic services related to police, planning and public works. As such, some recommendations that follow assume ideal funding and staffing availability that may never become available. Necessarily, these recommendations may need to be addressed by volunteer efforts; such is the tradition in this community. Absent volunteer efforts, it is recognized that the implementation of these items may only be a very long-term goal, notwithstanding any apparent “high” priority indicated. Proposed supporting actions, facilities and programs have been numbered sequentially. Priority level and responsible party have been suggested for the recommended items below. PLAN FOR THE NEEDS OF BICYCLISTS In order to effectively provide for the needs of bicyclists, a variety of planning activities are needed including acquiring funding, coordinating efforts and evaluating progress on implementing the plan. P-1. Anticipate Bicycle Needs in Transportation Planning Functions Priority: High Responsible Party: Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Proposed Network Improvements
    City of San Mateo | Bicycle Master Plan 5. Proposed Network Improvements This chapter presents proposed bikeways and bicycle support facilities identified through input from the community, City staff and the needs analysis. The proposed improvements are intended to make bicycling more comfortable and accessible for bicyclist of all skill levels and trip purposes. This chapter presents the following improvement types: Network Improvements fill gaps in the existing network so the community has a seamless bicycle network to use. Spot Improvements identify specific locations for focused improvement. Studies identify potential improvements for consideration and further analysis. Bicycle Parking identifies key locations citywide for bicycle parking installation, a bike parking plan for downtown and a recommended bicycle parking ordinance. 5.1. Network Improvements This section includes bikeway network, pavement markings and signage improvements as well as a Complete Streets policy recommendation. The bikeway recommendations include over 36 miles of new facilities to increase San Mateo’s bikeway connectivity and to create a comprehensive, safe, and logical network. At full build-out of the proposed bikeways, San Mateo will have 76 bikeway miles, improving connections from residential neighborhoods to attractors such as retail, transit and jobs. The pavement markings and signage will support the bikeway network by providing network identify. The Complete Streets policy will encourage future San Mateo transportation network design to consider all users. Figure 5-1 shows the existing and proposed bikeway network and Tables 5-1 through 5-3 list the bikeways by type and mileage. The proposed bikeways were developed with consideration for roadway widths, traffic volumes and speeds, connections to destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\TEMP\Revised Paper with Working Hypotheses.Wpd
    Markets as Interactions of Producers and Consumers: The American and French Bicycle Markets, 1890-1910 Thomas Burr Qualifying Paper January, 2001 With the failure of state socialism, almost all societies have begun to organize their economies around market principles. Different societies are taking different paths to do this, with varying results. The difficulties encountered in Eastern Europe, and especially in Russia, contrast with the success of Chinese “market socialism,” and illuminate what many think is the asocial, “one-size-fits-all” character of the advice economists are giving Eastern European governments; their abstract models do not take into account qualitative differences between societies (Gray 1997; Brinton and Nee 1998). Even some economists are beginning to admit that the economy cannot be abstracted from society, and a few are resurrecting the tradition of institutionalism, though some versions (e.g., Hodgson 1996) are more social than others (Williamson 1985; North 1990). An important wing of economic sociology argues this point about qualitative difference (e.g., Orrù, Biggart, and Hamilton 1997; Gereffi 1994), and such differences must be taken into account as “the market” is introduced into post-socialist societies (Nee and Cao 1999). In this effort, studying both market economies and markets for single products is important. The old institutionalism and economic sociology take culture—a crucial and contested aspect of societies—into account far more than does the new institutionalism, and consequently find separating these two levels problematic. As Granovetter (1985) put it, economic actors are “embedded” in society; that is, analytically separating economic behavior from social behavior, as economists do, distorts the analysis and reduces understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Regulations Booklet
    SAFE Commuting R R EGULATIONS • Dismount and walk in designated Dismount Zones. • Stop at all stop signs and traffic lights. • Ride at night with a headlight. • Use hand signals and make eye contact with motorists. • Ride on the right-hand side of the road with the flow of traffic and do not ride the wrong way on a one-way street. • Take safety seriously and wear a helmet. Safe Commuting You do not have to be on the Colorado State University campus for very long to realize we have A LOT of alternative means of transportation, such as people walking, riding bicycles, scooters, skateboards and rollerblades. Alternative transportation options are clean, quiet, healthy ways to commute to and on campus. These forms of transportation are also relatively inexpensive and much easier to park close to your next class than a car. Bikes make up the largest means of alternative transportation used on campus and they are everywhere! An average of 15,000 bikes are on campus every day and with that many there are bound to be more accidents and thefts. A general guideline for safe cycling is if you should not do it in a car, you should not do it on a bike. Best securing practices call for locking the frame of the bike to a rack with a U-lock. You need to keep in mind the precautions necessary to protect your bike, yourself, and others. The basics for safe commuting on campus are on pages 1-3, but for more comprehensive information, we recommend that you refer to the complete Colorado State University Regulations beginning on page 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Program Recommendations
    Recommended Programs 5. Program Recommendations Of the Five Es of bicycle planning, four are related to programs: encouragement, education, enforcement and evaluation. Programs will complement engineering improvements such as bike paths, lanes and routes by giving Bakersfield residents the tools they need to safely and confidently use the bikeway network. All of the Five Es work together to enhance the bicycling experience in Bakersfield. The following section presents recommended programs to support the vision and goals of this plan. The recommendations include continuation of those the City currently administers and those identified by the community, as well additional programs that have proven to be popular and effective in other bicycle-friendly cities. 5.1 Encouragement The following programs are designed to encourage community members to ride bicycles. Through the public outreach process, community members identified encouragement programs as a way to increase bicycling mode share and reach the goals outlined in this plan as well as in the Sustainable Initiatives Plan. Community recommended programs include car-free streets and employer-based programs. 5.1.1 Safe Routes to School Program Helping children walk and bicycle to school is good for children’s health and can reduce congestion, traffic dangers and air pollution caused by parents driving children to school. Safe Routes to School programs use a "5 Es" approach; using Engineering, Education, Enforcement, Encouragement, and Evaluation strategies to improve safety and encourage children walking and biking to school. The programs are usually run by a coalition of city government, school and school district officials, and teachers, parents, students, and neighbors.
    [Show full text]