Technical Specification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

TECHNICAL NOTE IN VIEW OF PUBLICATION OF F4E-OMF-1156 "SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE REQUIREMENTS MANAGEMENT & VERIFICATION INFRASTRUCTURE AT F4E" Template: F4E_D_25JV8T v2.10 F4E_D_2S7RQX v1.0 TN-MS-OMF-1156 Page 1/5 Green ACRONYMS, TERMS AND DEFINITIONS Acronym Term Definition DOORS Dynamic Object Requirements Management tool commercialised by IBM Oriented https://www.ibm.com/products/requirements-management Requirements System DXL DOORS Scripting language based on C and C++ specially developed for eXtension DOORS to provide key features such as file format importers and Language exporters, impact and traceability analysis and inter-module linking tools. F4E Fusion for Energy The European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy. https://fusionforenergy.europa.eu/ IDM ITER Document Electronic Documentation storage space with a web-based client Management interface. system The IDM tool is used by IO (https://user.iter.org/), by F4E (https://idm.f4e.europa.eu/) and by EUROfusion. IRDRMFAO IBM Rational (Previously named T-REK, Telelogic Thales Requirement DOORS Engineering Kit) Requirements Set of process, data model and utilities added to DOORS following a Management methodology in compliance with international standards EIA632, Framework Add- ISO15288 and CMMI. On MIR Manage ITER Layer developed by F4E to customize the usage of DOORS in the Requirements ITER ecosystem. The key components of MIR are the MIR DM and the MIR Toolkit. MIR DM MIR Data Model IRDRMFAO Generic Data Model tailored to Manage ITER Requirements. Defines DOORS module templates, types, attributes, views and relationships. MIR TK MIR Toolkit Set of DXL scripts (.inc, .dxl, .hlp, .idx) and Office templates that builds menus like the 'MIR User' menu when launching DOORS. Key features of MIR Toolkit are: - embedded Word and Excel templates for smooth import/export. - Cockpits, the companion to guide the user through the F4E RMV process. - Manage Baselines, to automatically fill baseline suffix and description and build baseline sets according to triggering events. - MIR Diagnosis Tool, to scan a database and assess the progress with regards to the F4E RMV process through the computation of various Key Performance Indicators. - an automatic migration of a module from a MIR DM version to another. ppy person per year F4E_D_2S7RQX v1.0 TN-MS-OMF-1156 Page 2/5 Green Acronym Term Definition ReqIF Requirements https://www.omg.org/spec/ReqIF Interchange Format RMV Requirements Process to control and verify the requirements. Management & Verification RMVDB Requirements Database of requirements and verification activities. Management & Verification database VBA Visual Basic for Microsoft programming language and its integrated development Applications environment embedded in Microsoft Office. Table 1: Acronyms, Terms and Definitions 1 INTRODUCTION F4E is currently preparing a Call for Tender for a Multiple Framework Contract for "Support services for the Requirements Management & Verification infrastructure at F4E". The services are intended to complement and support the work carried out in the F4E Systems Engineering Group: • Service 1 "Maintenance and improvement of the RMV infrastructure": to maintain and improve the Requirements Management & Verification infrastructure implemented with DOORS 9, IRDRMFAO, MIR, SES; • Service 2 "Migration of the RMV infrastructure": to migrate the Requirements Management & Verification infrastructure to a newer environment. 2 CONTEXT The F4E RMV procedure is implemented through softwares running on hardwares (database servers, license servers, and other hardware components under the responsibility of F4E ICT). In this document, the "RMV infrastructure" only refers to the software part, composed of: • user tools: - IBM Rational DOORS 9.6, - IRDRMFAO 6.1 (IBM Rational DOORS Requirements Management Framework Add-On), - TRC SES (The Reuse Company, Systems Engineering Suite), - the F4E customization "MIR layer", • developer tools: The MIR layer development environment in F4E contains a project management tool/ticketing system to open improvement or bug issues (Atlassian Jira), a software source code editor (Sodius DXL Editor), a software version control system (Eclipse Subversive SVN) and a UML modeler (Visual Paradigm). F4E set up a hybrid RMV infrastructure around DOORS to serve a growing community of users within IO, F4E and 30 F4E suppliers. The licenses are administered by F4E on an F4E DOORS and IRDRMFAO license server and made available to the community. Each member of the community sets its own local DOORS database but takes its licenses on the F4E license server. F4E counts about 70 different users every month, and peaks below 30 simultaneous users. As a consequence, exchange of requirements data between the F4E DOORS database and the DOORS databases of the F4E partners is a key issue. F4E_D_2S7RQX v1.0 TN-MS-OMF-1156 Page 3/5 Green To support and control the exchange of requirements data, F4E developed the MIR layer (Manage ITER Requirements layer) that contains two key components: • the MIR DM (Manage ITER Requirements Data Model) that is the customization by F4E of the IRDRMFAO (IBM generic data model, that is to say the DOORS module templates, the types, the attributes, the views and the relationships). • the MIR Toolkit, a set of additional resources to follow the RMV process in a tooled environment. - The MIR Toolkit is a .zip file containing DOORS DXL scripts and various Microsoft Word and Excel templates with VBA macros. The MIR Toolkit contains about 80,000 lines of DXL code and 1,600 lines of VBA code. - The MIR Toolkit appears as an additional menu in DOORS with several additional functions to support the F4E process. Among these new functions we find: the "Cockpits", a companion to smoothly guide the user through the RMV process. "Manage Baselines" to automatically fill baseline suffix and description and build baseline sets according to triggering events. the "MIR Diagnosis Tool" to scan a database and assess the progress with regards to the RMV process through the computation of various Key Performance Indicators. an automatic migration of a module from a MIR DM version to another. an object explorer to analyse impacts. Word-to-DOORS and Excel-to-DOORS import tools optimized with the usage of the F4E Word and Excel templates. a DOORS-to-Word export tool based on the IRDRMFAO WEXP (Word Enhanced eXPorter). a DOORS-to-Excel export tool based on the Enhanced Export to Excel of Galactic Solutions (http://galactic-solutions.com/downloads/GalacticDownloadExcel.htm). an Analysis Transfer tool in the spirit of the IRDRMFAO Compare/Transfer mechanism. 3 REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Service 1 "Maintenance and improvement of the RMV infrastructure" The Supplier shall support F4E in the maintenance and improvement of the RMV infrastructure. The Supplier shall lead the maintenance and improvement of the MIR layer. The Supplier shall maintain and follow a Configuration Management Plan when modifying the MIR layer. The Supplier shall contribute to the planification of the short and mid term evolutions of the RMV infrastructure. NB: This includes the survey of IBM fix lists on DOORS 9 and IRDRMFAO, the recommendation to upgrade when relevant, and the handling of IBM cases. The Supplier shall record the RMV infrastructure deployed in production. 3.2 Service 2 "Migration of the RMV infrastructure" The Supplier shall provide a market analysis of the requirements management tools. The Supplier shall support F4E in the selection of the new requirements management tool, taking into account technical and financial criteria. The Supplier shall conduct the migration of the pilot projects from DOORS 9 to the new requirements management tool (with ReqIF as the most probable intermediate format). The Supplier shall conduct the migration of the relevant projects from DOORS 9 to the new requirements management tool. F4E_D_2S7RQX v1.0 TN-MS-OMF-1156 Page 4/5 Green 4 FRAMEWORK CONTRACT TYPE, CEILING AND DURATION The Framework Contract is foreseen to be signed with two Contractors in Cascade for a Duration of seven Years with an estimated Ceiling of 2,300,000.00 EUR. It is currently expected that F4E will request: - the support service 1 "Maintenance and improvement of the RMV infrastructure" to be performed mainly within the F4E facilities in Barcelona, Spain, and - the support service 2 "Migration of the RMV infrastructure" at the Supplier's premises. Specific Contracts of typically 1 year duration will be issued for the estimated volume below. Service Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Total Service 1 - Development Engineer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 Service 2 - Senior Migration Engineer 1 1 1 3 Service 2 - Junior Migration Engineer 1 1 2 Total 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 12 Table 2: Estimated volume for indicative purposes (ppy) Disclaimer: These forecasts are indicative and do not imply any commitment from F4E. The chosen Procurement Procedure is an Open Procedure that is planned to be published before end of Quarter 3 2021. - End of the Document - F4E_D_2S7RQX v1.0 TN-MS-OMF-1156 Page 5/5 Green .
Recommended publications
  • Data Model Standards and Guidelines, Registration Policies And

    Data Model Standards and Guidelines, Registration Policies And

    Data Model Standards and Guidelines, Registration Policies and Procedures Version 3.2 ● 6/02/2017 Data Model Standards and Guidelines, Registration Policies and Procedures Document Version Control Document Version Control VERSION D ATE AUTHOR DESCRIPTION DRAFT 03/28/07 Venkatesh Kadadasu Baseline Draft Document 0.1 05/04/2007 Venkatesh Kadadasu Sections 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 revised 0.2 05/07/2007 Venkatesh Kadadasu Sections 1.4, 2.0, 2.2, 2.2.1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2 revised 0.3 05/24/07 Venkatesh Kadadasu Incorporated feedback from Uli 0.4 5/31/2007 Venkatesh Kadadasu Incorporated Steve’s feedback: Section 1.5 Issues -Change Decide to Decision Section 2.2.5 Coordinate with Kumar and Lisa to determine the class words used by XML community, and identify them in the document. (This was discussed previously.) Data Standardization - We have discussed on several occasions the cross-walk table between tabular naming standards and XML. When did it get dropped? Section 2.3.2 Conceptual data model level of detail: changed (S) No foreign key attributes may be entered in the conceptual data model. To (S) No attributes may be entered in the conceptual data model. 0.5 6/4/2007 Steve Horn Move last paragraph of Section 2.0 to section 2.1.4 Data Standardization Added definitions of key terms 0.6 6/5/2007 Ulrike Nasshan Section 2.2.5 Coordinate with Kumar and Lisa to determine the class words used by XML community, and identify them in the document.
  • Using Telelogic DOORS and Microsoft Visio to Model and Visualize Complex Business Processes

    Using Telelogic DOORS and Microsoft Visio to Model and Visualize Complex Business Processes

    Using Telelogic DOORS and Microsoft Visio to Model and Visualize Complex Business Processes “The Business Driven Application Lifecycle” Bob Sherman Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals [email protected] Michael Sutherland Galactic Solutions Group, LLC [email protected] Prepared for the Telelogic 2005 User Group Conference, Americas & Asia/Pacific http://www.telelogic.com/news/usergroup/us2005/index.cfm 24 October 2005 Abstract: The fact that most Information Technology (IT) projects fail as a result of requirements management problems is common knowledge. What is not commonly recognized is that the widely haled “use case” and Object Oriented Analysis and Design (OOAD) phenomenon have resulted in little (if any) abatement of IT project failures. In fact, ten years after the advent of these methods, every major IT industry research group remains aligned on the fact that these projects are still failing at an alarming rate (less than a 30% success rate). Ironically, the popularity of use case and OOAD (e.g. UML) methods may be doing more harm than good by diverting our attention away from addressing the real root cause of IT project failures (when you have a new hammer, everything looks like a nail). This paper asserts that, the real root cause of IT project failures centers around the failure to map requirements to an accurate, precise, comprehensive, optimized business model. This argument will be supported by a using a brief recap of the history of use case and OOAD methods to identify differences between the problems these methods were intended to address and the challenges of today’s IT projects.
  • Principles of the Concept-Oriented Data Model Alexandr Savinov

    Principles of the Concept-Oriented Data Model Alexandr Savinov

    Principles of the Concept-Oriented Data Model Alexandr Savinov Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science Academy of Sciences of Moldova Academiei 5, MD-2028 Chisinau, Moldova Fraunhofer Institute for Autonomous Intelligent System Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany http://www.conceptoriented.com [email protected] Principles of the Concept-Oriented Data Model Alexandr Savinov Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of Moldova Academiei 5, MD-2028 Chisinau, Moldova Fraunhofer Institute for Autonomous Intelligent System Schloss Birlinghoven, 53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany http://www.conceptoriented.com [email protected] In the paper a new approach to data representation and manipulation is described, which is called the concept-oriented data model (CODM). It is supposed that items represent data units, which are stored in concepts. A concept is a combination of superconcepts, which determine the concept’s dimensionality or properties. An item is a combination of superitems taken by one from all the superconcepts. An item stores a combination of references to its superitems. The references implement inclusion relation or attribute- value relation among items. A concept-oriented database is defined by its concept structure called syntax or schema and its item structure called semantics. The model defines formal transformations of syntax and semantics including the canonical semantics where all concepts are merged and the data semantics is represented by one set of items. The concept-oriented data model treats relations as subconcepts where items are instances of the relations. Multi-valued attributes are defined via subconcepts as a view on the database semantics rather than as a built-in mechanism.
  • Metamodeling the Enhanced Entity-Relationship Model

    Metamodeling the Enhanced Entity-Relationship Model

    Metamodeling the Enhanced Entity-Relationship Model Robson N. Fidalgo1, Edson Alves1, Sergio España2, Jaelson Castro1, Oscar Pastor2 1 Center for Informatics, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife(PE), Brazil {rdnf, eas4, jbc}@cin.ufpe.br 2 Centro de Investigación ProS, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, España {sergio.espana,opastor}@pros.upv.es Abstract. A metamodel provides an abstract syntax to distinguish between valid and invalid models. That is, a metamodel is as useful for a modeling language as a grammar is for a programming language. In this context, although the Enhanced Entity-Relationship (EER) Model is the ”de facto” standard modeling language for database conceptual design, to the best of our knowledge, there are only two proposals of EER metamodels, which do not provide a full support to Chen’s notation. Furthermore, neither a discussion about the engineering used for specifying these metamodels is presented nor a comparative analysis among them is made. With the aim at overcoming these drawbacks, we show a detailed and practical view of how to formalize the EER Model by means of a metamodel that (i) covers all elements of the Chen’s notation, (ii) defines well-formedness rules needed for creating syntactically correct EER schemas, and (iii) can be used as a starting point to create Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tools for EER modeling, interchange metadata among these tools, perform automatic SQL/DDL code generation, and/or extend (or reuse part of) the EER Model. In order to show the feasibility, expressiveness, and usefulness of our metamodel (named EERMM), we have developed a CASE tool (named EERCASE), which has been tested with a practical example that covers all EER constructors, confirming that our metamodel is feasible, useful, more expressive than related ones and correctly defined.
  • The Importance of Data Models in Enterprise Metadata Management

    The Importance of Data Models in Enterprise Metadata Management

    THE IMPORTANCE OF DATA MODELS IN ENTERPRISE METADATA MANAGEMENT October 19, 2017 © 2016 ASG Technologies Group, Inc. All rights reserved HAPPINESS IS… SOURCE: 10/18/2017 TODAY SHOW – “THE BLUE ZONE OF HAPPINESS” – DAN BUETTNER • 3 Close Friends • Get a Dog • Good Light • Get Religion • Get Married…. Stay Married • Volunteer • “Money will buy you Happiness… well, it’s more about Financial Security” • “Our Data Models are now incorporated within our corporate metadata repository” © 2016 ASG Technologies Group, Inc. All rights reserved 3 POINTS TO REMEMBER SOURCE: 10/19/2017 DAMA NYC – NOONTIME SPEAKER SLOT – MIKE WANYO – ASG TECHNOLOGIES 1. Happiness is individually sought and achievable © 2016 ASG Technologies Group, Inc. All rights reserved 3 POINTS TO REMEMBER SOURCE: 10/19/2017 DAMA NYC – NOONTIME SPEAKER SLOT – MIKE WANYO – ASG TECHNOLOGIES 1. Happiness is individually sought and achievable 2. Data Models can in be incorporated into your corporate metadata repository © 2016 ASG Technologies Group, Inc. All rights reserved 3 POINTS TO REMEMBER SOURCE: 10/19/2017 DAMA NYC – NOONTIME SPEAKER SLOT – MIKE WANYO – ASG TECHNOLOGIES 1. Happiness is individually sought and achievable 2. Data Models can in be incorporated into your corporate metadata repository 3. ASG Technologies can provide an overall solution with services to accomplish #2 above and more for your company. © 2016 ASG Technologies Group, Inc. All rights reserved AGENDA Data model imports to the metadata collection View and search capabilities Traceability of physical and logical
  • Towards the Universal Spatial Data Model Based Indexing and Its Implementation in Mysql

    Towards the Universal Spatial Data Model Based Indexing and Its Implementation in Mysql

    Towards the universal spatial data model based indexing and its implementation in MySQL Evangelos Katsikaros Kongens Lyngby 2012 IMM-M.Sc.-2012-97 Technical University of Denmark Informatics and Mathematical Modelling Building 321, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Phone +45 45253351, Fax +45 45882673 [email protected] www.imm.dtu.dk IMM-M.Sc.: ISSN XXXX-XXXX Summary This thesis deals with spatial indexing and models that are able to abstract the variety of existing spatial index solutions. This research involves a thorough presentation of existing dynamic spatial indexes based on R-trees, investigating abstraction models and implementing such a model in MySQL. To that end, the relevant theory is presented. A thorough study is performed on the recent and seminal works on spatial index trees and we describe their basic properties and the way search, deletion and insertion are performed on them. During this effort, we encountered details that baffled us, did not make the understanding the core concepts smooth or we thought that could be a source of confusion. We took great care in explaining in depth these details so that the current study can be a useful guide for a number of them. A selection of these models were later implemented in MySQL. We investigated the way spatial indexing is currently engineered in MySQL and we reveal how search, deletion and insertion are performed. This paves the path to the un- derstanding of our intervention and additions to MySQL's codebase. All of the code produced throughout this research was included in a patch against the RDBMS MariaDB.
  • HANDLE - a Generic Metadata Model for Data Lakes

    HANDLE - a Generic Metadata Model for Data Lakes

    HANDLE - A Generic Metadata Model for Data Lakes Rebecca Eichler, Corinna Giebler, Christoph Gr¨oger, Holger Schwarz, and Bernhard Mitschang In: Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK) 2020 BIBTEX: @inproceedingsfeichler2020handle, title=fHANDLE-A Generic Metadata Model for Data Lakesg, author=fEichler, Rebecca and Giebler, Corinna and Gr{\"o\}ger,Christoph and Schwarz, Holger and Mitschang, Bernhardg, booktitle=fInternational Conference on Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery (DaWaK) 2020g, pages=f73{88g, year=f2020g, organization=fSpringerg, doi=f10.1007/978-3-030-59065-9 7g g c by Springer Nature This is the author's version of the work. The final authenticated version is avail- able online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59065-9 7 HANDLE - A Generic Metadata Model for Data Lakes Rebecca Eichler1, Corinna Giebler1, Christoph Gr¨oger2, Holger Schwarz1, and Bernhard Mitschang1 1 University of Stuttgart, Universit¨atsstraße38, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany [email protected] 2 Robert Bosch GmbH, Borsigstraße 4, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany [email protected] Abstract The substantial increase in generated data induced the de- velopment of new concepts such as the data lake. A data lake is a large storage repository designed to enable flexible extraction of the data's value. A key aspect of exploiting data value in data lakes is the collec- tion and management of metadata. To store and handle the metadata, a generic metadata model is required that can reflect metadata of any potential metadata management use case, e.g., data versioning or data lineage. However, an evaluation of existent metadata models yields that none so far are sufficiently generic.
  • XV. the Entity-Relationship Model

    XV. the Entity-Relationship Model

    Information Systems Analysis and Design csc340 XV. The Entity-Relationship Model The Entity-Relationship Model Entities, Relationships and Attributes Cardinalities, Identifiers and Generalization Documentation of E-R Diagrams and Business Rules 2002 John Mylopoulos The Entity-Relationship Model -- 1 Information Systems Analysis and Design csc340 The Entity Relationship Model The Entity-Relationship (ER) model is a conceptual data model, capable of describing the data requirements for a new information system in a direct and easy to understand graphical notation. Data requirements are described in terms of a conceptualconceptual (or, ER) schema. ER schemata are comparable to class diagrams. 2002 John Mylopoulos The Entity-Relationship Model -- 2 Information Systems Analysis and Design csc340 The Constructs of the E-R Model AND/XOR 2002 John Mylopoulos The Entity-Relationship Model -- 3 Information Systems Analysis and Design csc340 Entities These represent classes of objects (facts, things, people,...) that have properties in common and an autonomous existence. City, Department, Employee, Purchase and Sale are examples of entities for a commercial organization. An instance of an entity is an object in the class represented by the entity. Stockholm, Helsinki, are examples of instances of the entity City, and the employees Peterson and Johanson are examples of instances of the Employee entity. The E-R model is very different from the relational model in which it is not possible to represent an object without knowing its properties (an employee is represented by a tuple containing the name, surname, age, and other attributes.) 2002 John Mylopoulos The Entity-Relationship Model -- 4 Information Systems Analysis and Design csc340 Examples of Entities 2002 John Mylopoulos The Entity-Relationship Model -- 5 Information Systems Analysis and Design csc340 Relationships They represent logical links between two or more entities.
  • Patterns for Slick Database Applications Jan Christopher Vogt, EPFL Slick Team

    Patterns for Slick Database Applications Jan Christopher Vogt, EPFL Slick Team

    Patterns for Slick database applications Jan Christopher Vogt, EPFL Slick Team #scalax Recap: What is Slick? (for ( c <- coffees; if c.sales > 999 ) yield c.name).run select "COF_NAME" from "COFFEES" where "SALES" > 999 Agenda • Query composition and re-use • Getting rid of boiler plate in Slick 2.0 – outer joins / auto joins – auto increment – code generation • Dynamic Slick queries Query composition and re-use For-expression desugaring in Scala for ( c <- coffees; if c.sales > 999 ) yield c.name coffees .withFilter(_.sales > 999) .map(_.name) Types in Slick class Coffees(tag: Tag) extends Table[C](tag,"COFFEES”) { def * = (name, supId, price, sales, total) <> ... val name = column[String]("COF_NAME", O.PrimaryKey) val supId = column[Int]("SUP_ID") val price = column[BigDecimal]("PRICE") val sales = column[Int]("SALES") val total = column[Int]("TOTAL") } lazy val coffees = TableQuery[Coffees] <: Query[Coffees,C] coffees(coffees.map ).map( :TableQuery(c => c.[Coffees,_]name) ).map( (c ) => ((c:Coffees) => (c.name ) : Column[String]) ): Query[Column[String],String] Table extensions class Coffees(tag: Tag) extends Table[C](tag,"COFFEES”) { … val price = column[BigDecimal]("PRICE") val sales = column[Int]("SALES") def revenue = price.asColumnOf[Double] * sales.asColumnOf[Double] } coffees.map(c => c.revenue) Query extensions implicit class QueryExtensions[T,E] ( val q: Query[T,E] ){ def page(no: Int, pageSize: Int = 10) : Query[T,E] = q.drop( (no-1)*pageSize ).take(pageSize) } suppliers.page(5) coffees.sortBy(_.name).page(5) Query extensions
  • HHS Logical Data Model Practices Guide

    HHS Logical Data Model Practices Guide

    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ENTERPRISE PERFORMANCE LIFE CYCLE FRAMEWORK <OIDV Logo> PPRRAACCTTIIICCEESS GGUUIIIDDEE LOGICAL DATA MODELING Issue Date: <mm/dd/yyyy> Revision Date: <mm/dd/yyyy> Document Purpose This Practices Guide is provides an overview describing the best practices, activities, attributes, and related templates, tools, information, and key terminology of industry-leading project management practices and their accompanying project management templates. Background The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) is a framework to enhance Information Technology (IT) governance through rigorous application of sound investment and project management principles, and industry best practices. The EPLC provides the context for the governance process and describes interdependencies between its project management, investment management, and capital planning components. The EPLC framework establishes an environment in which HHS IT investments and projects consistently achieve successful outcomes that align with Department and Operating Division goals and objectives. A Logical Data Model (LDM) is a complete representation of data requirements and the structural business rules that govern data quality in support of project’s requirements. The LDM shows the specific entities, attributes and relationships involved in a business function and is the basis for the creation of the physical data model. Practice Overview A logical data model is a graphical representation of the business requirements. They describe the data that are important to the organization and how they relate to one another, as well as business definitions and examples. The logical data model is created during the Requirements Analysis Phase and is a component of the Requirements Document. The logical data model helps to build a common understanding of business data elements and requirements and is the basis of physical database design.
  • The Layman's Guide to Reading Data Models

    The Layman's Guide to Reading Data Models

    Data Architecture & Engineering Services The Layman’s Guide to Reading Data Models A data model shows a data asset’s structure, including the relationships and constraints that determine how data will be stored and accessed. 1. Common Types of Data Models Conceptual Data Model A conceptual data model defines high-level relationships between real-world entities in a particular domain. Entities are typically depicted in boxes, while lines or arrows map the relationships between entities (as shown in Figure 1). Figure 1: Conceptual Data Model Logical Data Model A logical data model defines how a data model should be implemented, with as much detail as possible, without regard for its physical implementation in a database. Within a logical data model, an entity’s box contains a list of the entity’s attributes. One or more attributes is designated as a primary key, whose value uniquely specifies an instance of that entity. A primary key may be referred to in another entity as a foreign key. In the Figure 2 example, each Employee works for only one Employer. Each Employer may have zero or more Employees. This is indicated via the model’s line notation (refer to the Describing Relationships section). Figure 2: Logical Data Model Last Updated: 03/30/2021 OIT|EADG|DEA|DAES 1 The Layman’s Guide to Reading Data Models Physical Data Model A physical data model describes the implementation of a data model in a database (as shown in Figure 3). Entities are described as tables, Attributes are translated to table column, and Each column’s data type is specified.
  • What Is a Metamodel: the OMG's Metamodeling Infrastructure

    What Is a Metamodel: the OMG's Metamodeling Infrastructure

    Modeling and metamodeling in Model Driven Development What is a metamodel: the OMG’s metamodeling infrastructure Warsaw, May 14-15th 2009 Gonzalo Génova [email protected] http://www.kr.inf.uc3m.es/ggenova/ Knowledge Reuse Group Universidad Carlos III de Madrid What is a metamodel: the OMG’s metamodeling infrastructure 1 Structure of the seminar On the difference between What is a model: analysis and design syntax and semantics models What is a metamodel: Metamodeling directed the OMG’s metamodeling relationships in UML infrastructure By the way, what does this diagram mean, what is its syntax? What is a metamodel: the OMG’s metamodeling infrastructure 2 Sources • Jean Bézivin – Model Engineering for Software Modernization. • The 11th IEEE Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, Delft, November 8th-12th 2004. – On the unification power of models. • Software and Systems Modeling 4(2): 171–188, May 2005. • Colin Atkinson, Thomas Kühne – Model-Driven Development: A Metamodeling Foundation. • IEEE Software 20(5): 36-41, Sep-Oct 2003. – Reducing Accidental Complexity in Domain Models. • Software and Systems Modeling 7(3): 345-359, July 2008. • My own ideas and elaboration. What is a metamodel: the OMG’s metamodeling infrastructure 3 Table of contents 1. Introduction: definitions of metamodel 2. Representation and conformance 3. The four metamodeling layers 4. Metamodel and semantic domain 5. A case of metamodel/domain mismatch 6. Conclusions What is a metamodel: the OMG’s metamodeling infrastructure 4 Introduction: definitions of metamodel What is a metamodel: the OMG’s metamodeling infrastructure 5 What is a metamodel (according to Google definitions) • If someone still believes there is a commonly accepted definition..