Archeological Investigations of Teh 1874 Cavalry Barracks, Fort

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archeological Investigations of Teh 1874 Cavalry Barracks, Fort ARCHEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE 1874 CAVALRY BARRACKS, FORT LARAMIE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE, WYOMING by Douglas D. Scott W.E. Sudderth and Christopher Schoen Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 16 Prepared for Rocky Mountain Region, National Park Service United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 1992 ABSTRACT The Fort Laramie Cavalry Barracks was constructed in 1874 and continuously occupied until the National Park Service began interpretation of its history. A restoration effort required mitigative excavations in the building's interior and along the west side. Over 5,000 artifacts were recovered that physically document the changing uses of the building through time. Several features were identified that relate to the use of the site since at least the early 1860s. The foundations of a structure predating the barracks were discovered beneath the floor. The probable area where the lime concrete was mixed for the wall construction was identified. The barracks washroom dry sump was excavated, and a late military period or early civilian period trash pit was sampled. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Support for this project was provided by the Rocky Mountain Regional Office. Rick Cronenberger and Adrienne Anderson, from that office, reviewed and commented on workplans at the project's initial phase. The park staff provided very helpful comments on the report draft. Financial constraints and personnel changes delayed the completion of the report, but Dr. F.A. Calabrese encouraged the authors to complete the work. The field phase was directed by Chris Schoen, with able help from Bill Chada and Tom Hensiak. The Fort Laramie staff, specifically former Superintendent Gary Howe, Chief Ranger John Burns, and Curator Louise Samson, deserve special thanks for their help, encouragement, and other aid rendered to see the field work to a successful conclusion. Carrol Moxham and Mary Johnson did their usual fine job of drafting line drawings and producing the photographs for this report. Judy Pace's editorial efforts are greatly appreciated and undoubtedly have made this a better report. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................... i Acknowledgements . ii Table of Contents . iii List of Figures . iv Introduction . 1 A Brief History of Fort Laramie and the Cavalry Barracks ..................... 3 A Summary of Previous Investigations . 7 Description of Excavations . 9 Artifact Descriptions . 23 Interpretations . 303 Summary . 309 References Cited .................................................. 311 111 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The reconstructed Fort Laramie Cavalry Barracks ....................... 323 2. Data recording underway after floorboard removal . 323 3. Plan of the excavations of the barracks . 324 4. Profile of Feature 1, a probable dry sump . 325 5. Excavation limits reached in Feature 1 ............................... 326 6. The compacted area, Feature 2, found in TU-9 ......................... 326 7. Feature 3, a trash pit as excavated in TU-G ........................... 327 8. Profile of Feature 3 in TU-G ...................................... 327 9. A late nineteenth century bottle found in TU-G ........................ 328 10. A Spencer cartridge found in association with Feature 4 .................. 329 11. The east wall of Feature 4, a building foundation . 329 12. Glass bottles and bases recovered in the Barracks . 330 13. Oyster can label and condom box ............ ·....................... 331 14. Hersheys Cocoa label and Steinblock wine cork seal . 332 15. Pabst beer bottle ............................................... 333 16. Miscellaneous artifacts . 334 17. Camp boiler lid attributed to Pvt. John Robinson, 5th Cavalry ............. 335 IV INTRODUCTION The 1874 Fort Laramie Cavalry Barracks is one of the best preserved Plains Indian Wars enlisted men's barracks (Figure 1). In 1985, with the culmination of a long planning process, the National Park Service (NPS) began physical restoration of the barracks, to its nineteenth-century appearance. Restoration plans called for the replacement of floors, partition walls, door frames, and window frames, as well as improvement of the drainage around the barracks. Other construction included upgrading utilities and the installation of an underground fuel oil tank. Several of these restoration and adaptive use activities required ground-disturbing impacts. As a part of the historic preservation compliance process archeological investigations were undertaken in the vicinity of the surface disturbing activities. Three areas were investigated by the crew from the Midwest Archeological Center (MWAC), and one area was monitored by park personnel. MWAC personnel excavated a series of test units along the west side, rear elevation, of the building. This area was to have drainage tile emplaced to funnel runoff away from the barracks foundation. Test units were excavated to determine the presence or absence of cultural features in that area. Cultural features, if identified, were to be excavated to mitigate the effect of construction impacts. Excavation was limited to the construction zone. The site for the fuel oil tank was tested to determine if construction would effect any cultural deposits or features at that location. This area is located east of the north half of the barracks. The barracks interior was also tested. The original barracks floor was laid with the joists either just above or directly on the native clay surface, which accelerated their deterioration. In order to provide for better air circulation and eliminate subfloor joist contact with the soil, the area between and beneath the joists was to be excavated. The archeological investigations conducted in the barracks interior were designed to minimize impacts to intact subsurface cultural resources caused by interior restoration activities. The interior archeological investigations focused on the recovery of cultural debris that had collected beneath the barracks floor since its construction in 1874 (Figure 2). A few centimeters of dust and dirt had accumulated beneath the floor in 111 years, along with construction and remodeling debris, and lost personal possessions. The artifacts were collected and recorded in order to ascertain if any artifact depositional pattern was apparent. The room layout and use during the army period is fairly well documented, and the post-army occupation room layout and use is also moderately well documented. Analysis of the artifact deposition pattern was intended to correlate historic room use/function through time with the cultural debris left behind by the various occupants and their associated activities. Subsurface testing was conducted to determine if other cultural features or occupations were present. Several construction-related features were noted, and pre-barracks and post-army occupation features were identified and recorded. These are assessed and interpreted relative to the analytical goal of defining the depositional pattern. Interior subsurface testing efforts were primarily limited to the south half of the barracks due to the extensive post-army occupation subfloor disturbance in the barracks' north half. The north half contained several abandoned utilities trenches, and the area below the joists had been excavated by the post-army period occupants. However, this occupation left behind a great deal of trash which was recorded and collected by park staff, and forwarded to MWAC for processing and analysis. Park staff also monitored the backhoe excavation of the new utilities and sewer lines trenches (Samson 1986). MW AC field investigations were conducted between September 23 and October 7, 1985. The backhoe trench monitoring was conducted from March 20 to 25, 1986. During the restoration effort, another archeological feature was discovered. The senior author returned to Fort Laramie on October 21, 1986, to fully record and further test the feature. Upon completion of this last activity artifact analysis and reporting was to have commenced. Unfortunately, personnel changes and a lengthy detail by one of the authors forced the report into abeyance until late 1988. Artifact processing and writing then began in earnest and culminated in this report of investigations. 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF FORT LARAMIE AND THE CAVALRY BARRACKS Fort Laramie's history is the subject of numerous articles and books (cf. Hieb 1954, Mattes 1980, Lavender 1983) and need not be repeated in detail here. Broadly, there are three periods of cultural occupation which can be identified historically and archeologically. The first is the Fur Trade Period which began in 1834 with the construction of Fort William and ended with the sale of the second fur trade post (Fort John) to the U.S. Army in 1849. The Army or Military Period extended from 1849 to 1890. In June of 1890, the fort and military reservation were turned over to the Department of the Interior and opened to homesteading. This Farm Period began with the homesteaders and lasted into the 1930s. In 1938 the National Park Service began its administration of the area as an historic site. The specific history of the Cavalry Barracks is detailed by McDermott and Sheire (1970). They have done an excellent job of placing the construction of the barracks in the historical setting. They have documented the conflicting authorities of line and staff officers regarding the selection of fort sites and the type of construction allowed at a given
Recommended publications
  • Method 107 October 7, 2020
    Method 107 October 7, 2020 While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the document, it is not the official version. The most recent edits to this method were published here: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-08-30/pdf/2016-19642.pdf. To see a complete version including any recent edits, visit: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR?page=browse and search under Title 40, Protection of Environment. METHOD 107 - DETERMINATION OF VINYL CHLORIDE CONTENT OF IN-PROCESS WASTEWATER SAMPLES, AND VINYL CHLORIDE CONTENT OF POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RESIN SLURRY, WET CAKE, AND LATEX SAMPLES Note: Performance of this method should not be attempted by persons unfamiliar with the operation of a gas chromatograph (GC) nor by those who are unfamiliar with source sampling, because knowledge beyond the scope of this presentation is required. This method does not include all of the specifications (e.g., equipment and supplies) and procedures (e.g., sampling and analytical) essential to its performance. Some material is incorporated by reference from other methods in this part. Therefore, to obtain reliable results, persons using this method should have a thorough knowledge of at least the following additional test methods: Method 106. 1.0 Scope and Application 1.1 Analytes. Analyte CAS No. Sensitivity Vinyl Chloride (CH2:CHCl) 75–01–4 Dependent upon analytical equipment. 1.2 Applicability. This method is applicable for the determination of the vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) content of in-process wastewater samples, and the residual vinyl chloride monomer (RCVM) content of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) resins, wet, cake, slurry, and latex samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Brick Installation Instructions DESIGNED by NATURE
    Brick Installation Instructions DESIGNED BY NATURE. PERFECTED BY BOULDER CREEK.® 8282 Arthur Street NE Minneapolis , MN 55432 • 763-786-7138 • Fax 763-786-7276 • www.bouldercreekstone.com Getting Started INSTRUCTIONS BRICK INSTALLATION Congratulations on your decision to enhance the look of your home with Boulder Creek Brick products. Boulder Creek Brick products are made from a lightweight concrete material that replicates the look and texture of natural brick, and offers the benefit of being able to be installed directly to any surface. Calculating Materials Necessary If you haven’t already purchased your materials, you may be wondering how much Boulder Creek Brick will be necessary to complete your project. • First, measure the square footage of the total area to be covered by brick. • If you will be using corners on your project, plan for Example: each linear foot of corner pieces to cover ¾ square Total Surface Area= 100 sf foot of area. Corner Height = 8 ft. 8 ft. corner • Example: If you had a 100 square foot wall with an 8 8 x ¾ sf = 6 sf foot corner, the corner pieces would cover 6 square (Coverage by corners) 100 sf area feet of the wall. So, subtracting 6 from 100, you would 100 sf - 6 sf = 94 sf need 94 square feet of flat brick to cover the face of the wall, and 8 linear feet of corner pieces. Tips Some things to keep in mind before, during and after the installation process: Keep the Brick Clean During Installation Check Local Building Codes • Keep your hands clean. • Building codes vary from area to area.
    [Show full text]
  • Elastomeric Closures for Parenteral Applications
    ROHSTOFFE UND ANWENDUNGEN RAW MATERIALS AND APPLICATIONS Parenterals . elastomeric closures . injection vials . infusion bottles . Elastomeric Closures for pre-fillable syringes Parenteral Applications Parenteral drug preparations are sterile preparations intended for administrati- on by injection, infusion or implantati- Parenteral closure types and designs plug diameter, flange thickness, total on into the human or animal body [1]. Parenteral drugs are administered by in- stopper height and penetration thick- Especially for injection and infusion ap- jection, infusion or implantation. The ness. The latter refers to the thickness of plications very often elastomeric closu- parenteral drug route is different from the rubber membrane that a small dia- res are used to guarantee the seal inte- e.g. the oral route or from the route of meter needle or a larger diameter hollow grity of the entire drug package. This inhalation. For injection and infusion ap- spike has to penetrate in order to get ac- article gives an insight into the required plications very often rubber closures are cess to the contents of the vials and eit- property profile of such closures. used to guarantee the integrity of the her inject a reconstitution medium or seal that is formed by the elastomeric withdraw the solution from the vials for closure and another component of the administration to the patient. Most of Elastomere Teile für Parenteralia total drug package. Since parenteral these dimensions are standardized in drugs are rendered sterile before they are corresponding standards issued by the Parenteralia . Elastomerdichtungen . put in the market, preservation of seal International Organization for Standar- Injektionsfläschchen . Infusionsfla- integrity by itself comes down to preser- dization [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Greenland Grapevine a Community Newsletter for the Town of Greenland, NH
    Greenland Grapevine A Community Newsletter for the Town of Greenland, NH Vol. 8 Issue 2 Summer 2014 MEMORIAL DAY A Chance Meeting — Lifetime Memories IN GREENLAND By Glenn Bergeron Recently I had the extreme pleasure out she was headed to the small town of of talking with long-time Greenland Suippes, France, where the nurses were NH resident and WWII nurse veteran, to work in a make-shift general hospital Ruth Ladd. We discussed her nursing complex comprised of a series of large experiences in the war zone and espe- tents located behind the front lines. cially her surprise meeting with General George S. Patton, Jr. What follows is a It was here that Ruth encountered her heart-felt account of that meeting and first experience with the casualties of the events that led up to it. war. The amount and magnitude of It was July of 1944 and A parade, speeches, and music Ruth, along with her brought old and young alike together fellow nurses, had just at Remembrance Park on Memorial crossed the English Day. The solemn event was well Channel on a trans- attended as those who served in past port ship, which was and present wars were honored and now anchored off the remembered. For more scenes of the shore of Normandy, event, please turn to pages 10–11. France. They climbed aboard a Higgins landing craft (a small boat used to shuttle Sheila Pratt Selected as personnel from ship to shore that is made Citizen of the Year with a large front door By Barbara Fleming for a fast exit after At Town Meeting on Saturday, March at the school and in the community.
    [Show full text]
  • A Peak Inside a Pumpkin Yellow Corset
    Corset ca. 1900s. Ryerson FRC2013.05.001. Donated by Ingrid Mida. Photograph by Millie Yates, 2015. A PEEK INSIDE A PUMPKIN YELLOW CORSET By FRC Team This under bust corset (FRC 2013.05.001), dated 1900, is made of a rich pumpkin coloured woven jacquard cotton with a motif of staggered flower May 2, 2016 buds and stems (Note 1). The corset is lavishly trimmed with lace threaded with a similar yellow toned satin ribbon along the busk, and top and bottom edges. The centre front closes with metal slot and studs that are unmarked. The spoon busk measures 12 ¾ inches, with hand-stitching visible at the openings for surrounding each of the slots of the busk. The closed waist measures 23 inches, and there is notable discolouration along the panels along the waistline of the corset, as well as signs of wear including small stains and discolouration. Looking closely, there appears to have been four separate remnants of stitching resembling the shape of a dart, located respectively on each side of the front and back of the corset. There are 12 pairs of metal eyelets on the back to lace the corset; however the original laces are not present. The corset is lightly boned with 5 flexible bones placed directly beside each other, on each side of the corset, as well as one bone on either side of the eyelets at the back. One of the bones located on the back pokes out of the casing at revealing what appears to be ¼ inch flat white metal bone. The garment appears to have been sewn by machine; however the stitching is noticeably lacking fluidity and accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Stone Installation Instructions ESR-3111
    Stone Installation Instructions ESR-3111 Step 1: Preparing the Surface Water Resistive Barrier (WRB) If you will be installing the stone on an exterior non-masonry surface, it is recommended to apply a WRB such as an “All Weather” 15# Asphalt Saturated Felt paper meeting ASTM D4869 (Grade D paper) on top of house wrap. First, install a weep screed (optional – local building code may not require but supersedes these instructions) no more than 4” above concrete or paved surfaces or right where framing meets foundation, then apply WRB starting with the bottom edge at the lip of Overlap the weep screed continuing upward in a shingle like fashion. Overlap WRB a paper and lath top minimum of 2” on horizontal seams and 6” on vertical seams. (optional – sealing sheets over WRB with caulk or tape to corner boards or window jams may be required by local bottom building code and supersedes these instructions) Wire Lath Fold paper •Directly over WRB, or directly over the sheeting on an interior project, cover the area and lath around with metal wire lath. Cambridge recommends using a 2.5 lb/sq yd self-furring corners diamond metal lath meeting ASTM C847. •Install the lath horizontally overlapping a minimum of 2” the horizontal seams and House Wrap (Tyvek ™) 6” on the vertical seams. •The lath should feel smooth as you run your hand down over the lath and rough as 15# Felt you run your hand up over the lath. Fasten lath on both •Use fasteners (nails, staples, etc. meeting ASTM C1063 sec.7.10.2) that will penetrate Metal Lath sides of corner the framing or OSB a minimum of 1 inch.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Hawaii Addresses Command/Division Brigade Battalion Address 18 MEDCOM 160 Loop Road, Ft
    US Army Hawaii Addresses Command/Division Brigade Battalion Address 18 MEDCOM 160 Loop Road, Ft. Shafter, HI 96858 25 ID 25th Infantry Division Headquarters 2091 Kolekole Ave, Building 3004, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 25 ID (HQ) HHBN, 25th Infantry Division 25 ID Division Artillery (DIVARTY) HQ 25 ID DIVARTY HHB, 25th Field Artillery 1078 Waianae Avenue, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 25 ID DIVARTY 2-11 FAR 25 ID DIVARTY 3-7 FA 25 ID 2nd Brigade Combat Team HQ 1578 Foote Ave, Building 500, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 25 ID 2 BCT 1-14 IN BN 25 ID 2 BCT 1-21 IN BN 25 ID 2 BCT 1-27 IN BN 25 ID 2 BCT 2-14 CAV 25 ID 2 BCT 225 BSB 25 ID 2 BCT 65 BEB 25 ID 2 BCT HHC, 2 SBCT 25 ID 25th Combat Aviation Brigade HQ 1343 Wright Avenue, Building 100, WAAF, HI 96854 25 ID 25th CAB 209th Support Battalion 25 ID 25th CAB 2nd Battalion, 25th Aviation 25 ID 25th CAB 2ndRegiment Squadron, 6th Cavalry 25 ID 25th CAB 3-25Regiment General Support Aviation 25 ID 3rd Brigade Combat Team HQ Battalion 1640 Waianae Ave, Building 649, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 25 ID 3 BCT 2-27 INF 25 ID 3 BCT 2-35 INF BN 25 ID 3 BCT 29th BEB 25 ID 3 BCT 325 BSB 25 ID 3 BCT 325 BSTB 25 ID 3 BCT 3-4 CAV 25 ID 3 BCT HHC, 3 BCT 25 ID 25th Sustainment Brigade HQ 181 Sutton Street, Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 25 ID 25th SUST BDE 524 CSSB 25 ID 25th SUST BDE 25th STB 311 SC 311th Signal Command HQ Wisser Rd, Bldg 520, Ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Alk Life Science Solutions™
    ALK LIFE SCIENCE SOLUTIONS™ Catalog 2021 STERILE EMPTY VIALS (SEV) ITEM# VOLUME OUTER DIAMETER QUANTITY SEV213 2.0 cc 13 mm 100 SEV520 5.0 cc 20 mm 25 PRODUCT FEATURES *Available in Red, Green, Blue, and Silver Caps SEV1020 10 cc 20 mm 25 • USP Tested for Sterility *Available in Red, Green, Blue, and Silver Caps and Endotoxins SEV20 20 cc 20 mm 10 • Type 1 Glass USP SEV30 30 cc 20 mm 25 Borosilicate SEV50 50 cc 20 mm 25 SEV100 100 cc 20 mm 25 • cGMP FDA Manufacturer • Certificate of Analysis Available for All Production Lots • Latex Free Chlorobutyl Stopper • Aseptically Assembled in an ISO 5 (class 100) Cleanroom SEV213 SEV520 SEV1020S SEV30 SEV50 SEV100 2.0 cc 5.0 cc 10 cc 30 cc 50 cc 100 cc Assembled, Sterilized, and Tested in the USA AMBER STERILE EMPTY VIALS (SEV) ITEM# VOLUME OUTER DIAMETER QUANTITY SEV213S-AMB 2.0 cc 13 mm 100 PRODUCT FEATURES SEV520S-AMB 5.0 cc 20 mm 25 SEV1020S-AMB 10 cc 20 mm 25 • USP Tested for Sterility SEV30-AMB 30 cc 20 mm 25 and Endotoxins SEV50-AMB 50 cc 20 mm 25 SEV100-AMB 100 cc 20 mm 25 • Type 1 Glass USP Borosilicate • cGMP FDA Manufacturer • Certificate of Analysis Available for All Production Lots • Latex Free Chlorobutyl Stopper • Aseptically Assembled in an ISO 5 (class 100) Cleanroom SEV100-AMB SEV50-AMB SEV30-AMB SEV1020S-AMB SEV520-AMB SEV213-AMB 100 cc Amber 50 cc Amber 30 cc Amber 10 cc Amber 5.0 cc Amber 2.0 cc Amber Assembled, Sterilized, and Tested in the USA extra layer of security FLUROTEC® BARRIER ® FILM FluroTec ITEM DESCRIPTION Maintain drug purity and potency by choosing FluroTec® barrier film.
    [Show full text]
  • Thin Cut Installation
    “Natural Stone for any place and every space.” In addition to our line of full veneer, Semco StoneR also offers our ThinCutTM Natural Stone Veneer. ThinCutTM is available in depths that average one inch thick and is only one quarter the weight of full veneer. The reduced weight allows this veneer to be installed where full veneer cannot be used or is too difficult, such as dormers, gables, and existing interior and exterior structures. ThinCutTM can be applied to any structurally sound surface, including any masonry surface, concrete block, brick, cement, wallboard, plywood, paneling or metal buildings. ThinCutTM is durable, beautiful, and adds value to any home or business. CALCULATING NECESSARY MATERIALS: SCRATCH COAT, MORTAR & GROUT: Begin by guring the square footage of the area Example: Dry mix the sand and the cement together to you plan to cover with stone. If your project avoid creating clumps in the mixture. Add water Total Surface Area = 100 sq. ft. includes corner stones, deduct .75 square foot slowly to the mixture a little at a time, continually Corner Height = 9’ mixing until you have achieved the consistency of for each linear foot of corners that you will (9 x .75 = 6.75) utilize. Semco’s ThinCutTM Natural Stone Veneer a paste or whipped potatoes. Mix a minimum of 5 100 sq. ft. minutes. is packaged assuming a 1/2” mortar joint. If - 6.75 sq. ft. your joint will vary from this number you must 9’ Corner 93.25 sq. ft. MIXING AND APPLYING THE SCRATCH COAT: adjust your quantities accordingly. Scratch Coat: 1 part Type S Masonry Cement to 93.25 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act E-Register, Which Is Accessible Through the Website of the Ontario Heritage Trust At
    This document was retrieved from the Ontario Heritage Act e-Register, which is accessible through the website of the Ontario Heritage Trust at www.heritagetrust.on.ca. Ce document est tiré du registre électronique. tenu aux fins de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, accessible à partir du site Web de la Fiducie du patrimoine ontarien sur www.heritagetrust.on.ca. ...... ..,. • NovinaWong City Clerk City Clark's Tai: [416) 392-8016 City Hall, 2nd Roor, West Fax:[416) 392-2980 100 Queen Street West [email protected] Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2 http://www.city.toronto.on.ca ---- - - .. - - i April 26, 1999 j ,.-- ~~··,, "\ ... 1 1··, - ...._. ,... '•I ' . ~ ......... IN 1'HE MATTER OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT I -- - - - - - -· -- - - -- - . :! R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER 0.18 AND ,;------·-. 2 STRA NAVENUE (ST EY BA CKS) CI1'Y OF TORONTO, PROVINCE OF ONTARIO NOTICE OF PASSING OF BY-LAW To: City of Toronto Ontario Heritage Foundation 100 Queen Street West 10 Adelaide Street East Toronto, Ontario Toronto, Ontario M5H2N2 MSC 1J3 Take notice that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Toronto has passed By-law No. 188-1999 to designate 2 Strachan Avenue as being of architectural and historical value or interest. • Dated at Toronto this 30th day of April, 1999. Novina Wong City Clerk r ' .. .,. ~- ~ ...... ' Authority: Tor9nto Community Council Report No. 6, Clause No. 55, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on April 13, 14 and 15, 1999 Enacted by Council: April 15, 1999 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 188-1999 t/' / / To designate the property at 2 Strachan Avenue (Stanley Barracks) as being of architectural and historical value or interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Agilent 7890A GC Operating Guide
    Agilent 7890A Gas Chromatograph Operating Guide Agilent Technologies Notices © Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2007-2010 Warranty Safety Notices No part of this manual may be reproduced The material contained in this docu- in any form or by any means (including ment is provided “as is,” and is sub- CAUTION electronic storage and retrieval or transla- ject to being changed, without notice, tion into a foreign language) without prior A CAUTION notice denotes a hazard. It agreement and written consent from Agi- in future editions. Further, to the max- calls attention to an operating lent Technologies, Inc. as governed by imum extent permitted by applicable United States and international copyright law, Agilent disclaims all warranties, procedure, practice, or the like that, if laws. either express or implied, with regard not correctly performed or adhered to, to this manual and any information could result in damage to the product Manual Part Number contained herein, including but not or loss of important data. Do not limited to the implied warranties of proceed beyond a CAUTION notice G3430-90011 merchantability and fitness for a par- until the indicated conditions are fully ticular purpose. Agilent shall not be understood and met. Edition liable for errors or for incidental or Third edition, June 2010 consequential damages in connection WARNING Second edition, September 2008 with the furnishing, use, or perfor- First edition, March 2007 mance of this document or of any A WARNING notice denotes a hazard. information contained herein. Should Printed in USA or China It calls attention to an operating Agilent and the user have a separate procedure, practice, or the like that, if Agilent Technologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • How Was It Made?
    HOW WAS IT MADE? HURRICANE SANDY DAMAGE CUBA RECOVERY IN THE EASTERN REGION SYSTEMATIZATION EXPERIENCES Compilers Erly Arner Reyes/ Universidad de Oriente/ Alkaid Benítez Pérez/ Universidad de Holguín/ OIKOS/ Proyecto “Asistencia de emergencia en la rehabilitación de viviendas y reducción de riesgos en los mu- nicipios Mayarí y Rafael Freyre”/ Andrés Olivera Ranero/ Universidad Central de Las Villas/ Marilyn Fernández Pérez/ ONU-Hábitat Cuba Colaborators Francisco R. Grajales Lira/ Asociación Cubana de Producción Animal (ACPA) / Santiago de Cuba/ Proyecto ACPA y WELTHUNGERHILFE (Alemania): “AYUDA HUMANITARIA PARA FAMILIAS NECESITADAS Y REHABILITACION DE LA PRODUCCION AGRICOLA EN AREAS RURALES AFECTADAS POR EL HURACAN SANDY”/Guillermo Tasé Cámbara/ Asociación Cubana de Producción Animal (ACPA) /Ugo Puccio/ GVC – Holguín/ Proyecto “Recuperación de los medios de subsistencia familiar, de la vivienda rural y de los servicios al medioambiente, afectados por el huracán Sandy” - ECHO/CUB/BUD/2012/91006/ Raúl Figueredo Reyes/ UNAICC Holguín/ Raúl Solozano Guerrero /CARE – UNAICC– UPIV Holguín/ Progra- ma de Asistencia de Emergencia a los afectados por el Huracán Sandy en la provincia de Holguín/ María de los Ángeles Romero Chirino/ Unidad Provincial Inversionista de la Vivienda Santiago de Cuba/ Wal- do Andrés Vicente Hernández/ Unidad Provincial Inversionista de la Vivienda Santiago de Cuba/ José Angel Despaigne Quesada/ Unidad Municipal Inversionista de la Vivienda, Palma Soriano, Santiago de Cuba/ Sergio Peña Macías/ Cruz Roja Cubana Provincial Santiago de Cuba/ Juan Manuel Pascual Menéndez/ Profesor Titular Facultad de Construcciones Universidad de Oriente/ Beatriz Hadad Pérez/ Profesora Instructora Facultad de Construcciones Universidad de Oriente/ Aris Arias Batalla/ Cruz Roja Cubana Provincial Santiago de Cuba/ Mayté Wong Rodríguez/ UPIV Holguín.
    [Show full text]