DOCSLIB.ORG

PSAD-76-172 Federal Short Takeoff and Landing Transport Programs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PSAD-76-172 Federal Short Takeoff and Landing Transport Programs REPORT TO THE CONGR.ESS 1~ll~~llMlllll lllllllllllllllllllIll/lIll/Ill/ LM101767 BY THE COLWPTRBLLER GENERAL QFTHE UNITEDSTATES Federa! Short Takeoff And Landing Transport Progranw- Status And Needs Department Qf Transpqrtation Natisnal Aeronautics an% Space Administration Department of Defense The 1971 civil aviation research and develop- ment policy study concluded that a new short-haul air transportation system empioy- ing shon takeoff and landing aircraft was needed. The multiagency effort to define elements for the new system was discontinued in 1974. Although weral agencies are continuing to develop short takeoff and landing aircraft technology, the Department of Transporta- tion is supporting continued improvement of rail transportation and better use of existing l air transportation facilities as preferred solu- . tions to short-haul transportation proL ‘ems. The Congress and the agencies involved need to reassess the needs and priorities for short- haul transportation systems based on market conditions. PSAD-71% 172 I s-187185 TO -the Bresident of the Senate and t5e Speaker of thl, = Eouse of Representatives This report describes Federal efforts to develop ? new short takeoff and landing air ,raft for use in a short-haul air transportation system. !l%e rspcrt questions the rele- vance and effectiveness of civil research and development that does not fully consider (1) the social and economic priorities of the user market and (21 the emerging national transportation policy which seem to prefer alternative means for solving short-haul transportation problems, Since 1970 Federal agencies have incurred obligations of arout $400 million to study, develop, and test ahart takeoif and landing transport technology. Our rew0rrw wa8 made because the technology, if applied, will require sub- stantial additional Federal investmsnts. We made our review pursuant to the Budget and &csunt- ing Act, 1921 131 U.S.C. 53), aud the Accounting ~JMI Audit- ing Act of 1950 (31 O.S.C. 67), He are sending copies of this report to the gtrector c Office of Management and Budget; rhe Secretary of -ampor- tation; the Secretary of the Air Force; and the minirtra- . tor , NaLional Aeronautics and Space Comptroller General : of the United Steter __-. _- - _ . - --Cantents --Page DIGEST i CHAPTER 1 IRTRODUCTI0N 1 Rxplanation of STOL, RTOL, and CTOL classPfications 2 2 INITIAL EFPORTs-CoORDI~1ATEDFIDERAL ACTION (1970-73) 4 3 A PARTINGOP &lE GAYS (15ij4-176) 8 -National Aeronautics and Space - Administration 8 Oepartuent of the Air Porte 8 . ~~Puhlic and.pgitPate sectors 9 .I -~~~:Department of,Transportation--- Federal Aviation-Administration 9 .- -.ai-.-i Department of Transportution-- . _.;.. Office-of :the ,Sec~etary. _. _ r .> 11 -4 -- __.CIVIL -NEEDPoR-JE~~&&'kkORT‘ 14 -5 -- llYLITA!Y-NRED. .. FOR'JET.* ST~L TRANSPORT _ . 18 -6 COBlCLUSIONS 19 : _ ~~. :i,: >=-...L7 -. .sI AGENCY-C&&NTS AND OUR EVALUATION AND RRCOCUIENDATIONS---- 22 Lack of coordination among agencies 22 Need for new_BOL,transportation syst;em . :. "i 24 : ; ; ._3 - _ .. 1Scale :pnd,p&&*of NASA ST& tech- ~nologypr*r&“1 25 r~sI:,;--~ed,for'~easses~~nt bf ReaehaI. ---__ reaearchi developent, and deuton- I .:; -: atrationactfvities for irprov- ing short-haul transpcrtation 27 ~Recommcndatkous 28 29 .-_ APPENDIX Page I NASASTOL technology development program 30 II Survey of metropolitian airports: cities in top 10 short-haul markets 39 III 'Bibliography 42 IV Letter dated June 10, 1976, from the Assis- tant Secretary for Administration, Depart- ment of Transportation 44 v. Letter dated July 2, 1976, from the Assis- tant Administrator for DOD and Interagency Affairs, National Aeronautics and Spaces Administration 50 . ._ VI Letter dated June 14, 1976, from the As- sociate Director for Economics and Govern- ment, Office of Hanagemoat and Budget 56' VII Letter dated July 7,‘1976; from the Director of Defense Research and Engineering, I%- partment of Defense 58 . __ _ VXXI Principal officials responsible for ad- ministering activities*dfscussed- in this report . 61 ABBRBVIATIO#S _’ MST Advanced Media STOL Rans&t --I- -- ;- CTOL Conventional 3%keoff and Imd img Federal Aviation Administration ; . Eli2 General Accounting Off ice -:.-- - NASA National Aeronautics’and Space Administration QCSEE Quiet Clean STOL Exper bental ‘&ngine QSATS Quiet Shor t-Haul Air 3ranrpor ta tion System QS= Quiet STOL Research Aircraft :-..y’- QUESTQL Quiet Ezpertients3 STUL TPatispwt I&rear& Airplane RTOL Reduced Takeoff and Landis- . STOL Short Takeoff and Landing V/STOL Ver tical/Shott Takeoff and Landiyg I ; -- COHPTRbLLERGENERAL'S FEDERALSEIORT TAKEOFF AND LANDING REPORTTo TEE CONGRESS TRANSPORTPROGRAMS--STATUS AND NEEDS Department of Transportation National Aeronautics and Space Administration Department of Defense I ---w-wDIGEST f I Plans to fulfill national short-haul transpor- tation objectives should be clarified and co- ordinated. Presently, each of several agencies is pursuing its program based on its own per- ception of present and future needs. TJO agencies--Air Force and National Aeronautics and Space Administration--are expending a&out $430 million in .separate programs to develop and test short: takeoff arid landing transport air= - craft. Although the military need-for such air&aft is tider study,~‘.the use of short take- off and landing technology in the civil tfanspor- tation field will require new route netwomks, close-in airports,‘- and -better ground transpoo- tation, in addition to commercially feasible shortYtakeoff --and landing aircraft and im- proved air traffic control prbdedures. $&rsg~ of the Fedi . al, state or local government agencies are making any e-fort to define and assess -the system elements heeded for com- met_cially acceptable-,_. ~.. operations. .ce&oping- aircraft tecbkl*y for the air transportation f$eld aile deferring assess- ment of the system within which it will operate and the market which it seeks to influence has resulted, and will continue to result, ir! rejection of the technology or failure- to develop other technologies more . _ acceptable to users. --:. : : ~: Father than supporting development of the system required -for short takeoff and land- ing aircraft operations, the Department of _...Tranportation supports improved rail trans- portation and better use of existing air PSAD-76-172 ---._. i __ , - transportation facilities as preferred solu- tions to the short-haul transportation prob- lems. In commenting on this report, however, the K&par tment stated that even though there is no agreement on when or if the shor:t take- off and landing aircraft technology will be applied, the technology is needed to provide future policy choices. (See p. 24.) In view of its preferred soluticns and the lack of any effort to define the system in which the aircraft would operate, GAO rec- ommends that the Department of Trampor ta- tion --assess the social, economic, and jur isdic- tional factors influencing system develop- ment in order t= determine the policy choices that could be provided by the emerging short takeoff and landing aircraft technology; anai . --establish pr ior i ties fur sBor.t-haul trens- portation systems and their related re- searchr develo@ent, and ~demonstrattoa programs based on anticipated market co& d i tions. .- _ Because of tha need to -set pr io;itids based . on an understanding of the user market, GAO also recomezlds that the appropriate -con- gressional committees and the other ageccies involved reassess the Federal programs for improving shon t-haul tr anspor ta tfon. --. .- _--- ---_ ,- r, 1 COMPTRbLLERGENERAL‘S FEDERALSHORT TAKEOFF MD LANDING REPORTTO THE CONGRESS TEL':NSPORTPROGRAMS--STATUS AND NEEDS P-par tment of Transportation b :ional Aeronautics and Space Administration Department of Defense v----wDIGEST Plans to fulfill national short-haul transpor- tation objectives should be ciarified and co- ord inated. Presently, each of several agencies is pursuing its program based on its own per- ceptior, of present and future needs. Two agencieb-- Air Force and National Aeronautics and Space Administration--are expendfng about $430 million in separate programs to develop and test short takeoff and landing transport air- craft, Although the military need for such aircraft is under study, the use of short take- off and landing technology in the civil tganspor-- tation field will require new route networks, close-in air ports, and better ground transpor- tation, in-addition to commercially feasible short takeoff and la,hding aircraft end ilo- prowed -air‘ traffic control procedures. &me of the Federal, state or local government agencies are making any effort to define and assess the syritem -elements needed for uoq- mercially acceptable operations. -bevelopihg -aircraft technology for the air transportation field mile deferring assess- ment of the system within which it will operate -and -the market which it seeks to influence has resulted, and will continue to result, in rejection of the technology or failure to develop other technologies more - _~_acceptable to users . ---. Rather than mpporting developsent of the system required for short takeoff and land- ing aircraft operations, the Department of Tranportation supports improved rail trans- portation and better use of existing air PSAD-76-172 --cl- i 1 -. transportation.. facilities as preferred solu- tions to the. short-haul transportation prob- lems. In commenting on this report, however, the Department stated that even though there is no agreement on when or if the short take- off and 1aa;iing aircraft technology will. be applied, the technology is needed to provide future policy choices. (See p. 24.) In view of its preferred solutions and the lack of any effort to define the system in which the aircraft would operate, GAO rec- ommends that the Department of Transpor ta- tion --assess the social, economic, and jur isdic- tional factors influencing system develop- ment in order to determine the policy choices that could be provided by the emerging short takeoff and landing aircraft technology; and --establish priorities for short-haul trans- por tation syeteets and their related re- search, develoment, and demonstration programs based on anticipated Pparket con- ditions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China's Aircraft Carrier Ambitions
    CHINA’S AIRCRAFT CARRIER AMBITIONS An Update Nan Li and Christopher Weuve his article will address two major analytical questions. First, what are the T necessary and suffi cient conditions for China to acquire aircraft carriers? Second, what are the major implications if China does acquire aircraft carriers? Existing analyses on China’s aircraft carrier ambitions are quite insightful but also somewhat inadequate and must therefore be updated. Some, for instance, argue that with the advent of the Taiwan issue as China’s top threat priority by late 1996 and the retirement of Liu Huaqing as vice chair of China’s Central Military Commission (CMC) in 1997, aircraft carriers are no longer considered vital.1 In that view, China does not require aircraft carriers to capture sea and air superiority in a war over Taiwan, and China’s most powerful carrier proponent (Liu) can no longer infl uence relevant decision making. Other scholars suggest that China may well acquire small-deck aviation platforms, such as helicopter carriers, to fulfi ll secondary security missions. These missions include naval di- plomacy, humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, and antisubmarine warfare.2 The present authors conclude, however, that China’s aircraft carrier ambitions may be larger than the current literature has predicted. Moreover, the major implications of China’s acquiring aircraft carriers may need to be explored more carefully in order to inform appropriate reactions on the part of the United States and other Asia-Pacifi c naval powers. This article updates major changes in the four major conditions that are necessary and would be largely suffi cient for China to acquire aircraft carriers: leadership endorsement, fi nancial affordability, a relatively concise naval strat- egy that defi nes the missions of carrier operations, and availability of requisite 14 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Design Study Me T Rop"Ol Itan Air Transit System
    NASA CR 73362 A DESIGN STUDY OF A MET R OP"OL ITAN AIR TRANSIT SYSTEM MAT ir 0 ± 0 49 PREPARED UNDER, NASA-ASEE SUMMER FACULTY FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM ,IN Cq ENGINEERING SYSTEMS DESIGN NASA CONTRACT NSR 05-020-151 p STANFORD UNIVERSITY STANFORD CALIFORNIA CL ceoroducedEAR'C-by thEGHOU AUGUST 1969 for Federal Scientific &Va Tec1nical 2 Information Springfied NASA CR 73362 A DESIGN STUDY OF A METROPOLITAN AIR TRANSIT SYSTEM MAT Prepared under NASA Contract NSR 05-020-151 under the NASA-ASEE Summer Faculty Fellowship Program in Engineering Systems Design, 16 June­ 29 August, 1969. Faculty Fellows Richard X. Andres ........... ......... ..Parks College Roger R. Bate ....... ...... .."... Air Force Academy Clarence A. Bell ....... ......"Kansas State University Paul D. Cribbins .. .... "North Carolina State University William J. Crochetiere .... .. ........ .Tufts University Charles P. Davis . ... California State Polytechnic College J. Gordon Davis . .... Georgia Institute of Technology Curtis W. Dodd ..... ....... .Southern Illinois University Floyd W. Harris .... ....... .... Kansas State University George G. Hespelt ........ ......... .University of Idaho Ronald P. Jetton ...... ............ .Bradley University Kenneth L. Johnson... .. Milwaukee School of Engineering Marshall H. Kaplan ..... .... Pennsylvania State University Roger A. Keech . .... California State Polytechnic College Richard D. Klafter... .. .. Drexel Institute of Technology Richard S. Marleau ....... ..... .University of Wisconsin Robert W. McLaren ..... ....... University'of Missouri James C. Wambold..... .. Pefinsylvania State University Robert E. Wilson..... ..... Oregon State University •Co-Directors Willi'am Bollay ...... .......... Stanford University John V. Foster ...... ........... .Ames Research Center Program Advisors Alfred E. Andreoli . California State Polytechnic College Dean F. Babcock .... ........ Stanford Research Institute SUDAAR NO. 387 September, 1969 i NOT FILMED. ppECEDING PAGE BLANK CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1--INTRODUCTION ...
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Real World: Mathematics
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Real World: Mathematics Educator Guide “Preparing for a Soft Landing” Educational Product Educators & Students Grades 6-8 www.nasa.gov NP-2008-09-106-LaRC Preparing For A Soft Landing Grade Level: 6-8 Lesson Overview: Students are introduced to the Orion Subjects: Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) and NASA’s plans Middle School Mathematics to return to the Moon in this lesson. Thinking and acting like Physical Science engineers, they design and build models representing Orion, calculating the speed and acceleration of the models. Teacher Preparation Time: 1 hour This lesson is developed using a 5E model of learning. This model is based upon constructivism, a philosophical framework or theory of learning that helps students con- Lesson Duration: nect new knowledge to prior experience. In the ENGAGE section of the lesson, students Five 55-minute class meetings learn about the Orion space capsule through the use of a NASA eClips video segment. Teams of students design their own model of Orion to be used as a flight test model in the Time Management: EXPLORE section. Students record the distance and time the models fall and make sug- gestions to redesign and improve the models. Class time can be reduced to three 55-minute time blocks During the EXPLAIN section, students answer questions about speed, velocity and if some work is completed at acceleration after calculating the flight test model’s speed and acceleration. home. Working in teams, students redesign the flight test models to slow the models by National Standards increasing air resistance in the EXTEND section of this lesson.
    [Show full text]
  • The SKYLON Spaceplane
    The SKYLON Spaceplane Borg K.⇤ and Matula E.⇤ University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA This report outlines the major technical aspects of the SKYLON spaceplane as a final project for the ASEN 5053 class. The SKYLON spaceplane is designed as a single stage to orbit vehicle capable of lifting 15 mT to LEO from a 5.5 km runway and returning to land at the same location. It is powered by a unique engine design that combines an air- breathing and rocket mode into a single engine. This is achieved through the use of a novel lightweight heat exchanger that has been demonstrated on a reduced scale. The program has received funding from the UK government and ESA to build a full scale prototype of the engine as it’s next step. The project is technically feasible but will need to overcome some manufacturing issues and high start-up costs. This report is not intended for publication or commercial use. Nomenclature SSTO Single Stage To Orbit REL Reaction Engines Ltd UK United Kingdom LEO Low Earth Orbit SABRE Synergetic Air-Breathing Rocket Engine SOMA SKYLON Orbital Maneuvering Assembly HOTOL Horizontal Take-O↵and Landing NASP National Aerospace Program GT OW Gross Take-O↵Weight MECO Main Engine Cut-O↵ LACE Liquid Air Cooled Engine RCS Reaction Control System MLI Multi-Layer Insulation mT Tonne I. Introduction The SKYLON spaceplane is a single stage to orbit concept vehicle being developed by Reaction Engines Ltd in the United Kingdom. It is designed to take o↵and land on a runway delivering 15 mT of payload into LEO, in the current D-1 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • ICAO Safety Report |2020
    SAFETY Safety Report 2020 Edition Foreword A Coordinated, Risk-based Approach to Improving Global Aviation Safety The air transport industry plays a major role in global economic activity and development. One of the key elements to maintaining the vitality of civil aviation is to ensure safe, secure, efficient and environmentally sustainable operations at the global, regional and national levels. A specialized agency of the United Nations, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) was established in 1944 to promote the safe and orderly development of international civil aviation throughout the world. ICAO promulgates Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) to facilitate harmonized regulations in aviation safety, security, efficiency and environmental protection on a global basis. Today, ICAO manages over 12 000 SARPs across the 19 Annexes and five Procedures for Air Navigation Services (PANS) to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention), many of which are constantly evolving in tandem with latest developments and innovations. ICAO serves as the primary forum for co-operation in all fields of civil aviation among its 193 Member States. Improving the safety of the global air transport system is ICAO’s guiding and most fundamental strategic objective. The Organization works constantly to address and enhance global aviation safety through the following coordinated activities: • Policy and Standardization; • Monitoring of key safety trends and indicators; • Safety Analysis; and • Implementing programmes to address safety issues. The ICAO Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) presents the strategy in support of the prioritization and continuous improvement of aviation safety. The GASP sets the goals and targets and outlines key safety enhancement initiatives (SEIs) aimed at improving safety at the international, regional and national levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints for STOL Operations in South Florida Conurbation Cedric Y
    Constraints for STOL Operations in South Florida Conurbation Cedric Y. Justin June 2021 Based on research previously published: Development of a Methodology for Parametric Analysis of STOL Airpark Geo-Density, Robinson et al. AIAA AVIATION 2018 Door-to-Door Travel Time Comparative Assessment for Conventional Transportation Methods and Short Takeoff and Landing On Demand Mobility Concepts, Wei et al. AIAA AVIATION 2018 Wind and Obstacles Impact on Airpark Placement for STOL-based Sub-Urban Air Mobility, Somers et al., AIAA AVIATION 2019 Optimal Siting of Sub-Urban Air Mobility (sUAM) Ground Architectures using Network Flow Formulation, Venkatesh et al, AIAA AVIATION 2020 Comparative Assessment of STOL-based Sub-Urban Air Mobility Operations in Massachusetts and South Florida, Justin et al. AIAA AVIATION 2020 Current Market Segmentation ? VTOL CTOL CTOL CTOL CTOL Capacity ? 200-400+ pax Twin Aisle Are there 120-210 pax scenarios where Single Aisle an intermediate solution using 50-90 pax STOL vehicles and Regional Aircraft sitting in- Design range below 300 nm Commuters between UAM 9-50 pax Flight time below 1.5 hours Thin-Haul and thin-haul 9 to 50 seat capacity operations exists? 4-9 pax Sub-Urban Missions 50-150 nm Air Mobility 4 to 9 revenue-seats Missions below 50 nm Urban Air Mobility 1-4 pax 1 to 4 revenue-seats 50 nm 300 nm 500 nm 3000 nm 6000+ nm Artwork Credit Uber Design Range 2 Introduction • Population, urbanization, and congestion Atlanta, GA Miami, FL Dallas, TX Los Angeles, CA have increased steadily over the past several decades • Increasing delays damage the environment and substantially impact the economy Driving time: 8 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Off Airport Ops Guide
    Off Airport Ops Guide TECHNIQUES FOR OFF AIRPORT OPERATIONS weight and balance limitations for your aircraft. Always file a flight plan detailing the specific locations you intend Note: This document suggests techniques and proce- to explore. Make at least 3 recon passes at different levels dures to improve the safety of off-airport operations. before attempting a landing and don’t land unless you’re It assumes that pilots have received training on those sure you have enough room to take off. techniques and procedures and is not meant to replace instruction from a qualified and experienced flight instruc- High Level: Circle the area from different directions to de- tor. termine the best possible landing site in the vicinity. Check the wind direction and speed using pools of water, drift General Considerations: Off-airport operations can be of the plane, branches, grass, dust, etc. Observe the land- extremely rewarding; transporting people and gear to lo- ing approach and departure zone for obstructions such as cations that would be difficult or impossible to reach in trees or high terrain. any other way. Operating off-airport requires high perfor- mance from pilot and aircraft and acquiring the knowledge Intermediate: Level: Make a pass in both directions along and experience to conduct these operations safely takes either side of the runway to check for obstructions and time. Learning and practicing off-airport techniques under runway length. Check for rock size. Note the location of the supervision of an experienced flight instructor will not the touchdown area and roll-out area. Associate land- only make you safer, but also save you time and expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Incorporates Many Significant Technological Enhancements Derived from Predecessor Development Programs
    AIAA AVIATION Forum 10.2514/6.2018-3368 June 25-29, 2018, Atlanta, Georgia 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference F-35 Air Vehicle Technology Overview Chris Wiegand,1 Bruce A. Bullick,2 Jeffrey A. Catt,3 Jeffrey W. Hamstra,4 Greg P. Walker,5 and Steve Wurth6 Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Fort Worth, TX, 76109, United States of America The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II incorporates many significant technological enhancements derived from predecessor development programs. The X-35 concept demonstrator program incorporated some that were deemed critical to establish the technical credibility and readiness to enter the System Development and Demonstration (SDD) program. Key among them were the elements of the F-35B short takeoff and vertical landing propulsion system using the revolutionary shaft-driven LiftFan® system. However, due to X- 35 schedule constraints and technical risks, the incorporation of some technologies was deferred to the SDD program. This paper provides insight into several of the key air vehicle and propulsion systems technologies selected for incorporation into the F-35. It describes the transition from several highly successful technology development projects to their incorporation into the production aircraft. I. Introduction HE F-35 Lightning II is a true 5th Generation trivariant, multiservice air system. It provides outstanding fighter T class aerodynamic performance, supersonic speed, all-aspect stealth with weapons, and highly integrated and networked avionics. The F-35 aircraft
    [Show full text]
  • Splashdown and Post-Impact Dynamics of the Huygens Probe : Model Studies
    SPLASHDOWN AND POST-IMPACT DYNAMICS OF THE HUYGENS PROBE : MODEL STUDIES Ralph D Lorenz(1,2) (1)Lunar and Planetary Lab, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0092, USA email: [email protected] (2)Planetary Science Research Institute, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK ABSTRACT Computer simulations and scale model drop tests are performed to evaluate the splashdown loads of a capsule in nonaqueous liquids, in anticipation of the descent of the ESA Huygens probe on Saturn's moon Titan which may have lakes and seas of liquid hydrocarbons. Deceleration profiles in liquids of low and high viscosity are explored, and how the deceleration record may be inverted to recover fluid physical properties is studied. 1. INTRODUCTION Fig.1 Impression of the Huygens probe descending to a splashdown in a hydrocarbon lake under Titan’s ruddy sky. While the splashdown scenario may be realistic, Saturn's moon Titan appears to be partly covered by the vista is not – Saturn will be on the other side of lakes and seas of organic liquids [1]. The short Titan during Huygens’ descent. Artwork by Mark photochemical lifetime of methane in the atmosphere, Robertson-Tessi and Ralph Lorenz. See which is close to its triple point just as water is on http:://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/titanart/titan1.html Earth, suggests that its continued presence in the atmosphere requires replenishment from a surface or subsurface reservoir. Furthermore, the dominant Little work, however, has been published on spacecraft product of methane photolysis is ethane, which is also splashdown dynamics since the Apollo era ; one a liquid at Titan's 94K surface temperature, and models notable exception being a study of the impact of the predict that an equivalent of several hundred meters Challenger crew module after its disintegration after global depth of ethane should have accumulated over launch.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Requirements for Sustainable Regional Aviation
    aerospace Article Aircraft Requirements for Sustainable Regional Aviation Dominik Eisenhut 1,*,† , Nicolas Moebs 1,† , Evert Windels 2, Dominique Bergmann 1, Ingmar Geiß 1, Ricardo Reis 3 and Andreas Strohmayer 1 1 Institute of Aircraft Design, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany; [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (D.B.); [email protected] (I.G.); [email protected] (A.S.) 2 Aircraft Development and Systems Engineering (ADSE) BV, 2132 LR Hoofddorp, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 Embraer Research and Technology Europe—Airholding S.A., 2615–315 Alverca do Ribatejo, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Recently, the new Green Deal policy initiative was presented by the European Union. The EU aims to achieve a sustainable future and be the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. It targets all of the continent’s industries, meaning aviation must contribute to these changes as well. By employing a systems engineering approach, this high-level task can be split into different levels to get from the vision to the relevant system or product itself. Part of this iterative process involves the aircraft requirements, which make the goals more achievable on the system level and allow validation of whether the designed systems fulfill these requirements. Within this work, the top-level aircraft requirements (TLARs) for a hybrid-electric regional aircraft for up to 50 passengers are presented. Apart from performance requirements, other requirements, like environmental ones, Citation: Eisenhut, D.; Moebs, N.; are also included.
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Basalt Construction Field Project of a Lunar Launch/Landing Pad – PISCES/NASA KSC Project Update R. P. Mueller1 and R
    47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 1009.pdf Planetary Basalt Construction Field Project of a Lunar Launch/Landing Pad – PISCES/NASA KSC Project Update R. P. Mueller1 and R. M. Kelso2, R. Romo2, C. Andersen2 1 National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA), Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Swamp Works Labora- tory, ) Mail Stop: UB-R, KSC, Florida, 32899, PH (321)867-2557; email: [email protected] 2 Pacific International Space Center for Exploration System (PISCES), 99 Aupuni St, Hilo, HI 96720, PH (808)935-8270; email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Introduction: odologies for constructing infrastructure and facilities Recently, NASA Headquarters invited PISCES to on the Moon and Mars using in situ materials such as become a strategic partner in a new project called “Ad- planetary basalt material. By using the indigenous ditive Construction with Mobile Emplacement” regolith materials on extra-terrestrial bodies, then the (ACME). The goal of this project is to investigate high mass and corresponding high cost of transporting technologies and methodologies for constructing facili- construction materials (e.g. concrete) can be avoided. ties and surface systems infrastructure on the Moon and At approximately $10,000 per kg launched to Low Mars using planetary basalt material. The first phase of Earth Orbit (LEO) this is a significant cost savings this project is to robotically-build a 20 meter (65-ft) which will make the future expansion of human civili- diameter vertical takeoff, vertical landing (VTVL) zation into space more achievable. Part of the first pad out of local basalt material on the Big Island of phase of the ACME project is to robotically-build a 20 Hawaii.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Analysis of Disc Rotor Wing
    © 2020 JETIR March 2020, Volume 7, Issue 3 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF DISC ROTOR WING 1 2 3 G. MANJULA , L. BALASUBRAMANYAM , S. JITHENDRA NAIK 1PG scholor, 2Asso.Professor, 3Asso.Professor Mechanical Engineering Department 1P.V.K.K Engineering College, Anantapur, AP, INDIA. Abstract-Disc rotor configuration may be a conceptual design. the aim of the Project is to guage the merits of the DiscRotor concept that combine the features of a retractable rotor system for vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) with an integral, circular wing for high-speed flight. The primary objective of this project is to style such a configuration using the planning software Unigraphics and afterward analyzing the designed structure for its structural strength in analysis software ANSYS. This project deals with the all the required aerodynamic requirements of the rotor configuration. In today’s world most the vtol/stol largely depends upon the thrust vectoring that needs huge amounts of fuel and separate devices like nozzles etc., whose production is extremely much tedious and dear. this is often an effort to use a rotor as within the case of helicopters for vtol/stol thus reducing the foremost of the value though weight would be considered as a hindrance to the project. Keywords: Disc rotor wing, vertical take-off and landing (VTOL), UNIGRAPHICS, ANSYS software, Force, Coefficients, Wall and Wing. I. INTRODUCTION A circular wing, or disc, is that the primary lifting surface of the Disc Rotor aircraft during high-speed flight (approx. 400knots). During the high-speed flight, the disc are going to be fixed (i.e.
    [Show full text]