Assessment of Water Quality in Laguna De Bay and Its Tributary Rivers by Examining Physicochemical Parameters Through Geostatistical Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stakeholders' Participation
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Principles of Stakeholder Participation 3. Stakeholders in the MRB Management and Development 4. Proceedings on the First Multi-Sectoral Consultation and Workshop 5. Proceedings on the Second Multi-Sectoral Consultation and Workshop 1 INTRODUCTION Stakeholder participation shall be a vital foundation of the management and development of the Marikina River Basin, in consonance with the Philippine Integrated River Basin Management and Development Master Plan’s encouragement of stakeholders’ participation. The rationale behind this is to (a) make service providers more responsive and accountable to beneficiaries; (b) align the provision of services with users’ needs and ability to pay, thereby improving cost recovery and sustainability; and (c) tailor arrangements for water service management to local practices. Involving stakeholders in the management and development of MRB allows for the joint identification of needs, innovative ways to meet these needs and ensures sustainability, in the long run. Further, it creates ownership of the decisions regarding Marikina River among the stakeholders, that will eventually ensure stable benefits, access to information and opportunities for the local communities, primarily but other key stakeholders both horizontally and vertically. In particular, the objectives of stakeholder participation are: Improvement of decision-making as the focus is on the views, perspectives and needs of the involved parties; Encouragement of public input and feedback mechanisms as proof that -
Meralco Peak Demand at 7,740 MW, 4.6% up Vs
2019 2018 % Inc (Dec) Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2 Sales Volume (GWh) 10,381 12,442 10,145 11,520 2% 8% Revenues 75,378 89,575 70,807 79,737 6% 12% Electric 73,632 87,635 69,009 77,894 7% 13% Distribution 14,273 18,182 14,081 16,582 1% 10% Generation and other pass-through 59,359 69,453 54,928 61,312 8% 13% Non-electricity 1,746 1,940 1,798 1,843 -3% 5% Core Income 5,598 6,719 4,917 5,934 14% 13% Reported Income 5,671 6,336 5,312 6,661 7% -5% Core EBITDA 8,828 11,051 8,688 8,897 2% 24% Reported EBITDA 8,828 11,051 8,688 8,897 2% 24% 164,953 164,953 150,544 150,544 Distribution revenues 32,455 30,663 Q2 89,575 79,737 Generation & other pass- 128,812 through charges 116,240 Electricity Revenues = 161,267 = Revenues Electricity Q1 75,378 70,807 Electricity Revenues = 146,903 = Revenues Electricity Non-electricity revenues 3,686 3,641 1H 2019 1H 2018 1H 2019 1H 2018 4,357 5,945 12,646 3% 4% 8% Costs Costs and Expenses 126,665 85% Purchased Power Operating Expenses Depreciation & Amortization Other Expenses 10,706 Subtransmission & Others 6,600 Distribution 25% Facilities 75% Capital Capital Expenditures 1H 2019 1H 2018 12.1% 11.7% 12.1% 11.7% Margins 7.5% 7.2% 7.3% 8.0% 19,879 19,879 17,585 17,585 Q2 11,051 11,051 8,897 8,897 12,317 12,007 11,973 10,851 6,719 6,336 6,661 5,934 Q1 8,828 8,688 8,828 8,688 5,598 4,917 5,671 5,312 1H 2019 1H 2018 FY 2019 FY 2018 1H 2019 1H 2018 1H 2019 1H 2018 Core EBITDA Reported EBITDA Core Income Reported Income TOTAL DEBT (in Million PhP) 39,882 31,263 (in Million PhP, Except Ratios) 1H 2019 1H 2018 24,410 15,946 -
Forecast of Potential Areas of Urban Expansion in the Laguna De Bay Basin and Its Implications to Water Supply Security
Ateneo de Manila University Archīum Ateneo Environmental Science Faculty Publications Environmental Science Department 2019 Forecast of Potential Areas of Urban Expansion in the Laguna de Bay Basin and Its Implications to Water Supply Security Lexxel JJ U. Tanganco Maria Angelica J. Alberto Charlotte Kendra Z. Gotangco Ateneo de Manila University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons Recommended Citation Tanganco, L. J. U., Alberto, M. A. J., & Gotangco, C. K. Z. (2019). Forecast of Potential Areas of Urban Expansion in the Laguna de Bay Basin and Its Implications to Water Supply Security. Philippine Journal of Science, 148(4), 715-724. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Science Department at Archīum Ateneo. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Science Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Archīum Ateneo. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Philippine Journal of Science 148 (4): 715-724, December 2019 ISSN 0031 - 7683 Date Received: 4 Jun 2019 Forecast of Potential Areas of Urban Expansion in the Laguna de Bay Basin and Its Implications to Water Supply Security Lexxel JJ U. Tanganco1, Maria Angelica J. Alberto1, and Charlotte Kendra Z. Gotangco1,2* 1Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University Quezon City, National Capital Region 1108 Philippines 2Ateneo Institute of Sustainability, Ateneo de Manila University Quezon City, National Capital Region 1108 Philippines The Laguna de Bay Basin is a highly important economic and environmental resource with a variety of land and water uses. -
Policy Briefing
WAVES Policy Brieng Philippines Policy October 2015 Brieng Summary Ecosystem Accounts Inform Policies for Better A pilot ecosystem Resource Management of Laguna de Bay account was developed for the Laguna de Bay Laguna de Bay is the largest inland body of water in the Philippines to provide information providing livelihood, food, transportation and recreation to key on ood mitigation capacity, water, shery provinces and cities within and around the metropolitan area of Manila. resource management; Competing uses, unsustainable land and water uses coupled with to identify priority areas population and industrial expansion have caused the rapid degradation for protection, regulation of the lake and its watershed. The data from the ecosystem accounts of pollution and sediment can help counter the factors that are threatening the Laguna de Bay's loading; and to inform water quality and ecology. strategies on water pricing and sustainable Land Cover Condition Water Quality development planning. Land conversion due to urban Pollution coming from domestic, sprawl and rapid industrial industrial and agricultural/forest Background development are causing a decline wastes contribute to the The development of the in forest cover and impacting degradation of the water quality. agriculture production. ecosystem accounts is Fish Production based on data collection Flood Mitigation The lake can still sustain sheries and analysis conducted Increase in soil erosion from the production but is threatened by by the Laguna Lake watershed has changed the pollution. Development Authority contours of the lake. (LLDA), the agency responsible for the water and land management of the Laguna Lake Basin. 2003 2010 Technical staff from the different units of the LLDA undertook the analyses supported by international and local experts under the World Bank's Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) Global Partnership Programme. -
Laguna Lake, the Philippines: Industrial Contamination Hotspots
Laguna Lake, The Philippines: industrial contamination hotspots Iryna Labunska, Kevin Brigden, Paul Johnston Greenpeace Research Laboratories Technical Note 06/2011 June 2011 1. Introduction Contamination of natural water resources by discharges from the industrial sector in the Philippines continues to be a significant problem. In 2007, Greenpeace launched the Water Patrol to document the impact of water pollution on local communities in the Philippines. Within the framework of this project, several industrial sites located around Laguna Lake were visited in July 2010. During these visits, samples of wastewater discharges into creeks and tributaries of Laguna Lake and corresponding sediment or soil samples were collected. The sites which were chosen for investigation in this study were those accommodating potentially polluting facilities in the area. The selection of the facilities was based on the following criteria: facility operations were thought to involve the use of toxic chemicals; the facility discharged wastewater directly into Laguna Lake or one of its tributaries; in some cases, the facility had been previously identified by government agencies as a polluting industry and listed in the black or red lists by the Laguna Lake Development Authority or the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Four facilities located to the south-east of Laguna Lake were targeted in the current study: Mayer Textile; Philippine Industrial Sealants and Coatings Corporation (PIS); TNC Chemicals; Carmelray 1 Industrial Park. Wastewater is discharged from these facilities into the San Juan River and the San Cristobal River. Two other target facilities were located to the north of Laguna Lake - Hansson Papers and Litton Mills. -
Urbanization and Related Environmental Issues Of
Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management, Vol. 3, 2017 URBANIZATION AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES OF METRO MANILA Ram Krishna Regmi Environment and Resource Management Consultant, Kathmandu, Nepal Email Address: [email protected] __________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Due to rapid urbanization, Metro Manila is facing many environmental challenges with its continuous accelerating urban growth rate. According to 2010 census of population Metro Manila accounts about one-third of the total urban population and about 13% of the total national population of Philippines.The impact of urban growth of the Metro Manila to its urban environment relating on demography, solid wastes problem and problems in water bodies as well as air pollution and greenhouse gas emissionis emphasized here in this study.The flood prone areas within the Metro Manila is about 31%, most of the risk areas located along creeks, river banks or coastal areas.Metro Manila produces total garbage equivalent to 25% of the national waste generation in which about 17% is paper wastes and about 16% are plastics. In terms of water quality classification the upper reaches of the Marikina River is of Class A, but all remaining river systems are of Class C. Accordingly, the classification of Manila Bay is of Class SB. Similarly, the quality of ambient air of the Metro Manila is also poor. Using 2010 as base year, the major contributor to greenhouse gas is from vehicular emissions followed by the stationary sources. An urgent need is felt to incorporate environmental issues into planning its urban area to reduce the risks of further environmental degradation. Keywords: Metro Manila; urbanization; environmental issues; solid wastes;water quality; air pollution _________________________________________________________________________________ 1. -
MANILA BAY AREA SITUATION ATLAS December 2018
Republic of the Philippines National Economic and Development Authority Manila Bay Sustainable Development Master Plan MANILA BAY AREA SITUATION ATLAS December 2018 MANILA BAY AREA SITUATION ATLAS December 2018 i Table of Contents Preface, v Administrative and Institutional Systems, 78 Introduction, 1 Administrative Boundaries, 79 Natural Resources Systems, 6 Stakeholders Profile, 85 Climate, 7 Institutional Setup, 87 Topography, 11 Public-Private Partnership, 89 Geology, 13 Budget and Financing, 91 Pedology, 15 Policy and Legal Frameworks, 94 Hydrology, 17 National Legal Framework, 95 Oceanography, 19 Mandamus Agencies, 105 Land Cover, 21 Infrastructure, 110 Hazard Prone Areas, 23 Transport, 111 Ecosystems, 29 Energy, 115 Socio-Economic Systems, 36 Water Supply, 119 Population and Demography, 37 Sanitation and Sewerage, 121 Settlements, 45 Land Reclamation, 123 Waste, 47 Shoreline Protection, 125 Economics, 51 State of Manila Bay, 128 Livelihood and Income, 55 Water Quality Degradation, 129 Education and Health, 57 Air Quality, 133 Culture and Heritage, 61 Habitat Degradation, 135 Resource Use and Conservation, 64 Biodiversity Loss, 137 Agriculture and Livestock, 65 Vulnerability and Risk, 139 Aquaculture and Fisheries, 67 References, 146 Tourism, 73 Ports and Shipping, 75 ii Acronyms ADB Asian Development Bank ISF Informal Settlers NSSMP National Sewerage and Septage Management Program AHLP Affordable Housing Loan Program IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature NSWMC National Solid Waste Management Commission AQI Air Quality Index JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency OCL Omnibus Commitment Line ASEAN Association of Southeast Nations KWFR Kaliwa Watershed Forest Reserve OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development BSWM Bureau of Soils and Water Management LGU Local Government Unit OIDCI Orient Integrated Development Consultants, Inc. -
San Juan Sub-Basin
Table of Contents Volume 19. San Juan Sub-basin ........................................................................................... 3 Geographic location ................................................................................................................ 3 Political and Administrative Boundary ..................................................................................... 4 Land Cover ............................................................................................................................. 6 Sub-basin Characterization and Properties............................................................................. 8 Drainage Network ............................................................................................................... 8 Sub-sub basin Properties ...................................................................................................10 Water Quantity ......................................................................................................................11 Streamflow .........................................................................................................................11 Water Balance ...................................................................................................................12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 19-1 Geographical Map ..................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 19-2 Political Map ............................................................................................................................. -
2016 Calabarzon Regional Development Report
2016 CALABARZON Regional Development Report Regional Development Council IV-A i 2016 CALABARZON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT REPORT Foreword HON. HERMILANDO I. MANDANAS RDC Chairperson The 2016 Regional Development Report is an annual assessment of the socio- economic performance of the Region based on the targets of the Regional Development Plan 2011-2016. It highlights the performance of the key sectors namely macroeconomy, industry and services, agriculture and fisheries, infrastructure, financial, social, peace and security, governance and environment. It also includes challenges and prospects of each sector. The RDC Secretariat, the National Economic and Development Authority Region IV-A, led the preparation of the 2016 RDR by coordinating with the regional line agencies (RLAs), local government units (LGUs), state colleges and universities (SUCs) and civil society organizations (CSOs). The RDR was reviewed and endorsed by the RDC sectoral committees. The results of assessment and challenges and prospects in each sector will guide the planning and policy direction, and programming of projects in the region. The RLAs, LGUs, SUCs and development partners are encouraged to consider the RDR in their development planning initiatives for 2017-2022. 2016 Regional Development Report i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Foreword i Table of Contents ii List of Tables iii List of Figures vii List of Acronyms ix Executive Summary xiii Chapter I: Pursuit of Inclusive Growth 1 Chapter II: Macroeconomy 5 Chapter III: Competitive Industry and Services Sector 11 Chapter IV: Competitive and Sustainable Agriculture and Fisheries Sector 23 Chapter V: Accelerating Infrastructure Development 33 Chapter VI: Towards a Resilient and Inclusive Financial System 43 Chapter VII: Good Governance and Rule of Law 53 Chapter VIII: Social Development 57 Chapter IX: Peace and Security 73 Chapter X: Conservation, Protection and Rehabilitation of the Environment and 79 Natural Resources Credit 90 2016 Regional Development Report ii LIST OF TABLES No. -
DENR-BMB Atlas of Luzon Wetlands 17Sept14.Indd
Philippine Copyright © 2014 Biodiversity Management Bureau Department of Environment and Natural Resources This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the Copyright holder provided acknowledgement of the source is made. BMB - DENR Ninoy Aquino Parks and Wildlife Center Compound Quezon Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City Philippines 1101 Telefax (+632) 925-8950 [email protected] http://www.bmb.gov.ph ISBN 978-621-95016-2-0 Printed and bound in the Philippines First Printing: September 2014 Project Heads : Marlynn M. Mendoza and Joy M. Navarro GIS Mapping : Rej Winlove M. Bungabong Project Assistant : Patricia May Labitoria Design and Layout : Jerome Bonto Project Support : Ramsar Regional Center-East Asia Inland wetlands boundaries and their geographic locations are subject to actual ground verification and survey/ delineation. Administrative/political boundaries are approximate. If there are other wetland areas you know and are not reflected in this Atlas, please feel free to contact us. Recommended citation: Biodiversity Management Bureau-Department of Environment and Natural Resources. 2014. Atlas of Inland Wetlands in Mainland Luzon, Philippines. Quezon City. Published by: Biodiversity Management Bureau - Department of Environment and Natural Resources Candaba Swamp, Candaba, Pampanga Guiaya Argean Rej Winlove M. Bungabong M. Winlove Rej Dumacaa River, Tayabas, Quezon Jerome P. Bonto P. Jerome Laguna Lake, Laguna Zoisane Geam G. Lumbres G. Geam Zoisane -
Current Status and Prospects of Protected Areas in the Light of the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation Priorities
Proceedings of IUCN/WCPA-EA-4 Taipei Conference March 18-23, 2002, Taipei, Taiwan CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF PROTECTED AREAS IN THE LIGHT OF THE PHILIPPINE BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PRIORITIES Perry S. Ong, Ph. D. Fellow, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science, CI Science Director, Conservation International Philippines Associate Professor, Institute of Biology, UP Diliman I. INTRODUCTION The Philippines, the world’s second largest archipelago after Indonesia, covers a land area of about 300,000 km2 [1]. It is one of the 17 megadiversity countries, which between themselves contain 70 to 80 percent of global biodiversity [2]. Philippine rainforest is home to more than 1130 terrestrial wildlife species (Table 1) and between 10,000-13,000 species of plants [3] so far recorded, of which more than half are found nowhere else in the world. As such, the Philippines has also been described as Galapagos times ten [4]. It is also one of 25 global biodiversity hotspots [5, 6] with more than 97 percent of its original forest cover lost [7, 8]. In fact more original forests were lost in the last 50 years of the 20th century than what was lost in the previous 450 years combined [9]. Yet more new species are still being discovered on these islands than any other areas on earth in recent times [e.g., see 10, 11] Table 1. Diversity, endemism and conservation status of Philippine wildlife [11, 12, 13 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20] No. of No. of Endemic % No. of No. of Threatened Species Species endemics Endemic Species Threatened Species Amphibians 101+ 79+ 78% 24 24 Reptiles 258+ 170+ 66% 8 4 Birds 5761 195+1 34% 74 59 Mammals 204+1, 2 111+1 54% 51 41 Total 1139+ 555+1 49% 157 128 95 Legend: + includes new species (38 species of amphibians, 35 species of reptiles; 15 species of mammals); 1 includes rediscovered species 2 25 species of dolphins, whales and dugong The country’s marine waters cover 2.21 M km2 with a coastline of 22,450 km and an estimated 27,000 km2 of coral reefs [21]. -
Geographic Names
GEOGRAPHIC NAMES CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES ? REVISED TO JANUARY, 1911 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1911 PREPARED FOR USE IN THE GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE BY THE UNITED STATES GEOGRAPHIC BOARD WASHINGTON, D. C, JANUARY, 1911 ) CORRECT ORTHOGRAPHY OF GEOGRAPHIC NAMES. The following list of geographic names includes all decisions on spelling rendered by the United States Geographic Board to and including December 7, 1910. Adopted forms are shown by bold-face type, rejected forms by italic, and revisions of previous decisions by an asterisk (*). Aalplaus ; see Alplaus. Acoma; township, McLeod County, Minn. Abagadasset; point, Kennebec River, Saga- (Not Aconia.) dahoc County, Me. (Not Abagadusset. AQores ; see Azores. Abatan; river, southwest part of Bohol, Acquasco; see Aquaseo. discharging into Maribojoc Bay. (Not Acquia; see Aquia. Abalan nor Abalon.) Acworth; railroad station and town, Cobb Aberjona; river, IVIiddlesex County, Mass. County, Ga. (Not Ackworth.) (Not Abbajona.) Adam; island, Chesapeake Bay, Dorchester Abino; point, in Canada, near east end of County, Md. (Not Adam's nor Adams.) Lake Erie. (Not Abineau nor Albino.) Adams; creek, Chatham County, Ga. (Not Aboite; railroad station, Allen County, Adams's.) Ind. (Not Aboit.) Adams; township. Warren County, Ind. AJjoo-shehr ; see Bushire. (Not J. Q. Adams.) Abookeer; AhouJcir; see Abukir. Adam's Creek; see Cunningham. Ahou Hamad; see Abu Hamed. Adams Fall; ledge in New Haven Harbor, Fall.) Abram ; creek in Grant and Mineral Coun- Conn. (Not Adam's ties, W. Va. (Not Abraham.) Adel; see Somali. Abram; see Shimmo. Adelina; town, Calvert County, Md. (Not Abruad ; see Riad. Adalina.) Absaroka; range of mountains in and near Aderhold; ferry over Chattahoochee River, Yellowstone National Park.