DOCSLIB.ORG

Comment on Objection 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comment on Objection 4 Comment on objection number 4 Hon Michael Ferguson MP 2 pages Tasmanian secretariat Phone (03) 6235 0503 Email [email protected] HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Redistribution Committee - Tasmania 2nd Floor, NAB House 86 Collins Street HOBART TAS 7000 Dear members of the committee Re: Redistribution, Division of Bass - Comments on objections I wish to convey my support of the objections made to the Redistribution Committee's proposal regardingthe Division of Bass. Neither of Tasmania'stwo major political parties support the changesproposed to the Division of Bass, nor does the Dorset Council. Specifically, the excision of the municipalities ofFlinders and Dorset from Bass and their transfer to the Division of Lyons is unnecessary. The proposed changes overlook community of interests, means of communication and travel considerations and they will significantly disadvantage local residents, industry and businesses. I am not aware of any support from Flinders Council for the proposed changes, howevermy strong view is that members ofboth Flinders and Dorset communities would not support their relocation into a different electorate. To ensure the appropriatenumber of electors are enrolled in each division, there is a need for some redistribution of areas within the state. I believe that this shouldbe achievedin a waythat minimises the impact on the people ofTasmania. The minimisationof impact approachis strongly supported by the TasmanianDivision ofthe Liberal Party and also endorsedby the Australian LaborParty TasmanianBranch. The Liberal Party clearly stated in its submission that since the Division of Bass is currently within required legislative parameters, no changeshould be made to the existingboundaries. The LaborParty's submission was in agreement on this point. The Dorset Council has also objected to this change of boundaries. As the Dorset Mayor observed, the Dorset region has been part of Bass for more than a century. Its people, businesses, industry and community groups in the areahave substantial connections with Launceston. Townships throughout the Dorset municipality are linked to Launceston for health, education, commercial, cultural and transport purposes, with little associationwith the east coast or southern Tasmania. In contrast these connections do not exist for these communities with the Division of Lyons. It is clear that the community ofinterest for the Dorset and Flinders municipalities remainwith Bass and Launceston as a regional centre, and would not be reproduced with Lyons. Part ofthe difficulty with the creation of a community of interest between Dorset and the Division of Lyons is the size of the Division. With its large area and dispersed population its local Members of Parliament already face challenges in serving their constituents. This will be exacerbated by the inclusion of Dorset within Lyons. If the lack of strong community of interest is an argument for not moving Dorset into Lyons, the consideration of community of interests is even more important for the electors ofFlinders Island, who look to Launceston as their main mainland Tasmanian link and travel there for health, education, retail and business services. The island community has no little or no connectionwith the Division of Lyons or its towns and would be severely disadvantagedin gaining direct access to their representatives if they were transferred to Lyons. It is very clear that transferring two additionalmunicipalities to Lyons would significantly increase its area. The geographical enlargement of the electorate would diminish the level of access to and engagementwith its elected representatives currently experiencedby the electors. In summary, there are no logical geographical, social or financial connections that support the transfer of the Flinders Island and Dorset municipalities from Bass to Lyons and the proposal is strongly opposed by the Dorset Council. Neitherof Tasmania'smajor political parties have recommended changesto the Bass Division and the changes proposed would significantly impact local communities. Speakingas an individual elected member representingthe Bass electorate: the proposed boundary changes will have a flow through effect to the state boundaries. I strongly agree with the objections put forwardwith respect to the impact ofthe proposed changes and the lack of communities ofinterest between Lyons, Dorset and Flinders Island. On a more personal note, I can attest that the inclusion of those municipalities in Lyons would increase the difficulty of members ofparliament to provide those communities with the very best level of access to their elected representatives whichthey thoroughly deserve. Given there is no population requirement necessitating alteration to the boundariesof Bass, I would urge the Redistribution Committee to maintain the Division of Bass as it currently exists and explore other options to achieverequired rebalancingin Tasmania's other divisions. Yours sincerely Michae Fer son MP </^/20^.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Reading Speech
    DRAFT SECOND READING SPEECH HON WILL HODGMAN MP Constitution Amendment (House of Assembly Electoral Boundaries) Bill 2018 *check Hansard for delivery* I move – That the Constitution Amendment (House of Assembly Electoral Boundaries) Bill 2018 now be read for the second time. The Commonwealth recently reviewed the House of Representatives boundaries in Tasmania. This review was part of an independent redistribution of federal electoral boundaries, required under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The previous redistribution of the federal electoral boundaries in Tasmania was completed in 2009. The redistribution of electoral boundaries usually reflects population changes to ensure an even and fair allocation of voters among the electorates. Having even electorates is an important element of retaining ‘fairness’ in our voting system and indeed our democracy. On 14 November 2017, the Commonwealth augmented Electoral Commission for Tasmania announced new boundaries for the federal electorates in Tasmania. The augmented Commission consisted of the three members of the Australian Electoral Commission, the Australian Electoral Officer for Tasmania, Mr David Molnar, the Surveyor-General of Tasmania, Mr Michael Giudici, and the Auditor-General of Tasmania, Mr Rod Whitehead. The augmented Commission also announced that the division of ‘Denison’ be renamed to the division of ‘Clark’. This name change recognises the role of Andrew Inglis Clark in the creation of the Australian Federation. The new name and boundary changes will apply from the next federal election. However, these Commonwealth changes do not automatically apply as State electoral boundaries in Tasmania. In the past, the Tasmanian Parliament has chosen to adopt the Commonwealth House of Representatives boundaries for the purposes of House of Assembly divisions by amending the Constitution Act 1934 to ensure they coincide.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyons Lyons Lyons 8451
    BANKS STRAIT C Portland Swan I BASS STRAIT Waterhouse I GREAT MUSSELROE RINGAROOMA BAY BAY Musselroe Bay Rocky Cape C Naturaliste Tomahawk SistersBoat Harbour Beach Beach Table Cape ANDERSON Boat Harbour BAY Gladstone Sisters CreekFlowerdale Stony Head Myalla Wynyard NOLAND Bridport Moorleah Seabrook Lulworth BAY Five Mile Bluff Weymouth Dorset Lapoinya Beechford Bellingham South Somerset Mt Cameron Ansons Bay BURNIE Low Head West Head CPR2484 Calder Low Head Pipers Mt Hicks Brook Oldina Heybridge Greens Pioneer Preolenna Howth Badger Head Beach Lefroy Elliott Mooreville George Town Pipers River Sulphur Creek Devonport Kelso North Winnaleah Herrick Scottsdale FIRES Stowport Penguin Yolla Bell Jetsonville Clarence Point Cuprona ULVERSTONE CPR3658 Bay George Town West Ridgley Leith 2 Beauty Ridgley Upper West Pine Hawley Beach Golconda Blumont Derby DEVONPORT Shearwater Point OF Henrietta Stowport Natone Scottsdale Turners Northdown CPR2472 Takone Camena Port Sorell Nabowla Beach Lebrina Tulendeena Branxholm The Gardens Gawler Don Kayena West Scottsdale Wesley Vale Tonganah Highclere Forth Beaconsfield Weldborough North Tugrah Quoiba Tunnel Riana Thirlstane Sidmouth Springfield Sloop Motton Cuckoo BAY Abbotsham Moriarty Lower Legerwood Lagoon Tewkesbury South Spreyton Latrobe Turners Burnie Riana Eugenana Tarleton Harford West Deviot Marsh Upper Spalford Kindred Melrose Mt Direction Karoola South Ringarooma Binalong Bay Natone Lilydale Springfield Goulds Country CPR2049 Paloona Turners Hampshire CenGunnstral Coast Marsh Plains Sprent Latrobe
    [Show full text]
  • President Christina Holmdahl Speaks
    President Christina Holmdahl Speaks At the April meeting of our branch I notified you of the increase in membership fees that have been imposed on us by the National April 2017 Number 253 Executive without due and proper process of consultation with all the Working for Australians in branches of A.I.R. at a time when Retirement we continue to lose members. Association of Independent Retirees The Tasmanian Division of A.I.R. will meet on 11 May (A.I.R.) Limited 2017 and our branch representative at that meeting, Vice ACN 102 164 385 President Shane Dennington will raise the matter as well Newsletter as voicing our displeasure at the lack of proper process surrounding the increase, none of which will be retained by Northern Tasmania Branch the branches. PO Box 332, Launceston, 7250 It is the view of many that the branches currently pay far E: [email protected] too much to the National Body as a percentage of the (03) 6330 3322 membership fee. We ask why the National Body thinks it is reasonable to raise subscription dues by $10 for singles DATES 2017 and couples without reference to the branches and National retaining 100% of the increase. General Meeting Friday 19 May Specifically, a single will pay $56; the branch retains only IDG Meeting Friday 26 May $11.50, Division $2.50 and National $42.00. A couple will pay $82.00; branch retains $13.00, Division $5.00 and Committee Meeting Monday 15 May National $64.00. The retention rate for the branch for the second person of a couple is $1.50.
    [Show full text]
  • Information for Candidates
    Tasmanian House of Assembly Election 1996 Information for Candidates Section 1 - Information Section 2 - Extracts from Relevant Legislation November 1995 Introduction Purpose of this booklet This information booklet is intended to assist intending candidates at the 1996 Tasmanian House of Assembly General Election. For ease of reading, some sections of the Electoral Act 1985 have been paraphrased. However, it is important to note that this booklet has no legal status and should not be substituted for the Act itself. As this is the first Candidate Information booklet produced for Tasmanian House of Assembly Elections, any comments or suggestions for improvement arc welcome. Unless otherwise specified section references in subject headings are from the Electoral Act 7 985. Role of the Tasmanian Electoral Office and Returning Officers Candidates should be aware that the role of the Tasmanian Electoral Office and Returning Officers is to administer the election in accordance with the Electoral Act 7985 While interpretation of the Act forms part of the daily function of Returning Officers, it is not their role to provide legal advice to candidates, groups or parties. It is in the best interests of candidates to obtain legal interpretations from their own legal advisers. “Section 2 - Extracts from relevant legislation A section containing legislation follows the information section. Please note that only some of the relevant extracts have been included and candidates should refer to the original Acts for further provisions. Useful tips: Shaded boxes throughout the booklet highlight practical advice for candidates. Purchasing the Electoral Act 7985 and the Constitution Act 1934 The Electoral Act 1985 and other relevant iegislation can be purchased from the Tasmanian Government Bookshop.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly
    New South Wales Legislative Assembly PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Fifty-Seventh Parliament First Session Wednesday, 5 June 2019 Authorised by the Parliament of New South Wales TABLE OF CONTENTS Announcements.................................................................................................................................... 1497 Notices of Motions ........................................................................................................................... 1497 Documents ........................................................................................................................................... 1497 Auditor-General ............................................................................................................................... 1497 Reports ......................................................................................................................................... 1497 Announcements.................................................................................................................................... 1497 Australia's Biggest Morning Tea ..................................................................................................... 1497 Bills ...................................................................................................................................................... 1497 Library Amendment Bill 2019 ......................................................................................................... 1497 Second Reading Speech
    [Show full text]
  • House of Assembly Wednesday 2 May 2018
    Wednesday 2 May 2018 The Speaker, Ms Hickey, took the Chair at 10 a.m., acknowledged the Traditional People, and read Prayers. QUESTIONS Royal Hobart Hospital - Emergency Department Issues Ms WHITE question to PREMIER, Mr HODGMAN [10.02 a.m.] Did you know that yesterday there were 63 patients stuck in the emergency department at the Royal Hobart Hospital, patients were being treated in three corridors, and there were 10 ambulances ramped? This is bad for patients and bad for stressed staff. If anything, it looks like this winter will be worse than last winter. Why was the hospital not escalated to level 4, as staff were asking for? Was there political pressure not to escalate due to the parliament resuming? ANSWER Madam Speaker, I thank the Leader of the Opposition for the question but would cast a very healthy level of scepticism over any suggestions from her as to what this Government might do other than ensure we get on with the job of delivering on our record level of investment and commitments that will go to delivering the health service, which is improving under our Government and that we promised in the election. That is what we are focusing on. We recognise that there are pressures on the health system. That is why, with our budget back in balance, we have been able to commit a record amount over the last four years, $7 billion in the last budget and $750 million, to boost our efforts to improve the health system Tasmanians need. We will need to not only build the health system and the infrastructure to support it - Members interjecting.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Amendment (House of Assembly Electoral Boundaries) Bill 2009 Fact Sheet
    Constitution Amendment (House of Assembly Electoral Boundaries) Bill 2009 Fact Sheet The Commonwealth recently conducted a review of the House of Representatives boundaries in Tasmania, under the Commonwealth Electoral Act. The process is similar to that required under state legislation for the redistribution of Legislative Council boundaries. The redistribution has been completed and took effect on 16 February 2009. Under the determination, the division of Bass gains Hadspen from Lyons and the balance of the Launceston City municipal area from Lyons in the vicinity of Franklin Village and Relbia Road. The division of Denison gains part of the Kingborough municipal area generally north of Huon Highway and Browns Road from Franklin, including the localities of Neika, Firthside and Bonnet Hill. The division of Franklin cedes Bridgewater and Gagebrook to Lyons and part of the Kingborough municipal areas generally north of the Huon Highway and Browns Road to Denison, including the localities of Neika, Firthside and Bonnet Hill. It gains the balance of the Clarence City municipal area from Lyons, including Richmond. The division of Lyons cedes Hadspen to Bass and cedes the balance of the Launceston City municipal area to Bass in the vicinity of Franklin Village and Relbia Road. It cedes the West Coast municipal area to Braddon and gains the eastern portion of Latrobe municipal area contained in Western Tiers Legislative Council division (with minor exception) from Braddon. Lyons gains Bridgewater and Gagebrook from Franklin and cedes the balance of Clarence City municipal area including Richmond to Franklin. To avoid confusion in the minds of electors long accustomed to voting in the same division at State and Federal elections, it is both desirable and practical that our identical divisional boundaries continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Tas17-Fob0021 Australian Labor Party Tasmanian Branch
    Further objection number 21 ALP Tasmanian Branch 3 pages Tasmanian secretariat Phone (03) 6235 0503 Email [email protected] 26 July 2017 Redistribution Committee for Tasmania Australian Electoral Commission 2nd Floor, NAB Building 86 Collins Street HOBART TAS 7000 Dear Redistribution Committee of Tasmania, The Australian Labor Party, Tasmanian Branch is pleased to respond to the Redistribution Committee’s proposal for the redistribution of Tasmania into electoral divisions. The Australian Labor Party, Tasmanian branch expresses the view that the augmented Australian Electoral Commission decision to exclude from the division of Bass the urban component of Meander Valley Council should be rejected. The decision favours the community of interest arguments raised by Dorset municipality, but fails to recognise sufficiently, if at all, the deep connections at all levels between the urban parts of Meander Valley Council and the remainder of Launceston city. Meander Valley Council consists of an urban portion and a substantial rural component. The urban component is universally considered as indistinguishable from Greater Launceston. There is no obvious boundary between Launceston City Council and Meander Valley Council other than the features chosen to provide the boundary for municipal purposes. In larger metropolitan cities on the mainland such suburban distinctions on lines of community identity are considerably easier to identify. The Australian Labor Party, Tasmanian branch is strongly of the view that the local government boundary between Launceston and Meander Valley should not be utilised for the purposes of the redistribution, due to the fact that the community of interest overwhelmingly favours the retention of the urban parts of Meander Valley Council with the balance of Greater Launceston.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Gordon 5 Pages
    Objection Number 2 Martin Gordon 5 pages Tasmanian secretariat Phone (03) 6235 0503 Email [email protected] The Committee Objection I wish to make an objection to the proposals of the Redistribution Committee for Tasmania’s proposals. I had earlier made a submission and commented on other submissions. Below I have comments on the individual components of the committees and proposals and my critique of the committees logic. Several aspects of their approach are reasonable, whilst several seem inconsistent when compared with each other. Maintaining local government areas as whole - is selectively applied, for instance to West Tamar and Dorset Councils, but not to Meander Council. Whilst existing boundaries are maintained (Denison and Franklin) but significant changes are made without sufficient explanation to parts of Bass and Lyons. Braddon The Committee has chosen the option which is agreed in full by a large number of submitters (including myself), in part by others and which complies with the requirements of the redistribution, and produces a outcome of closeness to quota. The maps with local government areas, significant geographic features and population centres and means of communication bring you to an obvious conclusion. As a result I am entirely in agreement with the committees proposals! Bass and Lyons There is considerable similarity between my submission and the committee proposals with regards to Lyons and Bass. But, I was surprised that the Dorset Council and Flinders Island were transferred from Bass to Lyons and that Meander Council was not united in Lyons to enable the generally agreed incorporation of rest of West Tamar Council in Bass.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE PAPER No
    4581 1998-1999-2000 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NOTICE PAPER No. 88 TUESDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2000 The House meets this day at 2 p.m. GOVERNMENT BUSINESS Orders of the day 1 CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (APPLICATION) BILL 1999 (Attorney- General): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 24 November 1999—Mr Horne). *2 MINISTERS OF STATE AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1999 (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Finance and Administration): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 9 December 1999— Mr M. J. Evans). 3 APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 3) 1999-2000 (Minister for Finance and Administration): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 8 December 1999—Mr O’Connor). 4 APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 1999-2000 (Minister for Finance and Administration): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 8 December 1999—Mr O’Connor). *5 HEALTH LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 4) 1999 (Minister for Health and Aged Care): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 9 December 1999—Mr Melham). *6 HEALTH INSURANCE (APPROVED PATHOLOGY SPECIMEN COLLECTION CENTRES) TAX BILL 1999 (Minister for Health and Aged Care): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 9 December 1999—Mr Melham). 7 CLASSIFICATION (PUBLICATIONS, FILMS AND COMPUTER GAMES) AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 1999 (Attorney-General): Second reading— Resumption of debate (from 8 December 1999—Mr O’Connor). *8 NEW BUSINESS TAX SYSTEM (MISCELLANEOUS) BILL 1999 (Treasurer): Second reading—Resumption of debate (from 9 December 1999— Mr M. J. Evans). * Notifications to which an asterisk (*) is prefixed appear for the first time † Debate to be adjourned to a future day at the conclusion of the time allotted.
    [Show full text]
  • Proportional Representation in Theory and Practice the Australian Experience
    Proportional Representation in Theory and Practice The Australian Experience Glynn Evans Department of Politics and International Relations School of Social Sciences The University of Adelaide June 2019 Table of Contents Abstract ii Statement of Authorship iii Acknowledgements iv Preface vi 1. Introduction 1 2. District Magnitude, Proportionality and the Number of 30 Parties 3. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in the 57 Senate 4. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in Western 102 Australia 5. District Magnitude and Partisan Advantage in South Eastern Jurisdictions 132 6. Proportional Representation and Minor Parties: Some 170 Deviating Cases 7. Does Proportional Representation Favour 204 Independents? 8. Proportional Representation and Women – How Much 231 Help? 9. Conclusion 247 Bibliography 251 Appendices 260 i Abstract While all houses of Australian parliaments using proportional representation use the Single Transferable Vote arrangement, district magnitudes (the numbers of members elected per division) and requirements for casting a formal vote vary considerably. Early chapters of this thesis analyse election results in search for distinct patterns of proportionality, the numbers of effective parties and partisan advantage under different conditions. This thesis argues that while district magnitude remains the decisive factor in determining proportionality (the higher the magnitude, the more proportional the system), ballot paper numbering requirements play a more important role in determining the number of (especially) parliamentary parties. The general pattern is that, somewhat paradoxically, the more freedom voters have to choose their own preference allocations, or lack of them, the smaller the number of parliamentary parties. Even numbered magnitudes in general, and six member divisions in particular, provide some advantage to the Liberal and National Parties, while the Greens are disadvantaged in five member divisions as compared to six or seven member divisions.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Annual Report 2008–2009 Fourth Annual Report 2008−2009
    4th Annual Report 2008–2009 Fourth Annual Report 2008−2009 To The Honourable Susan Lynette Smith, President of the Legislative Council and The Honourable Michael Polley, Speaker of the House of Assembly We have the honour to submit the fourth report of the Tasmanian Electoral Commission for presentation to the Parliament pursuant to the provisions of section 13 of the Electoral Act 2004. The report covers the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009. Yours sincerely Liz Gillam Bruce Taylor (Vacant) CHAIRPERSON ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER MEMBER 21 October 2009 Tasmanian Electoral Commission Annual Report 2008–09 ISSN 1834-2981 Printed by Print Applied Technology This report can be downloaded in pdf format at www.tec.tas.gov.au Table of Contents Chairperson’s Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Electoral Commissioner’s Review ............................................................................ 2 About this Report ..................................................................................................... 3 About the Tasmanian Electoral Commission .......................................................... 3 Formation ........................................................................................................... 3 Functions and powers ....................................................................................... 3 Responsibilities of the Commission and the Commissioner .......................... 4 Approvals, appointments and determinations ..............................................
    [Show full text]