DOCSLIB.ORG

Clackamas County Water Environment Services Clackamas County Service District #1 Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Geomorphological Monitoring Report 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Clackamas County Water Environment Services Clackamas County Service District #1 Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Geomorphological Monitoring Report 2017 Clackamas County Water Environment Services Clackamas County Service District #1 Benthic Macroinvertebrate and Geomorphological Monitoring Report 2017 REPORT- June 29, 2018 prepared by TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 1.1 MONITORING NETWORK ............................................................................... 5 1.2 SETTING .................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................... 9 2.0 Methods ............................................................................................................ 10 2.1 SITE SELECTION................................................................................................ 10 2.2 GEOMORPHIC MONITORING ..................................................................... 12 2.3 MACROINVERTEBRATE MONITORING.................................................. 17 3.0 Observations and Results ................................................................................. 28 3.1 SITE DESCRIPTIONS ........................................................................................ 28 3.2 DATA SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 46 4.0 Discussion ........................................................................................................ 77 4.1 DISCUSSION OF GEOMORPHIC SURVEY ............................................... 77 4.2 DISCUSSION OF MACROINVERTEBRATE SURVEY ............................ 83 5.0 Recommendations and Conclusions ................................................................ 87 6.0 References ........................................................................................................ 94 Figures Figure 1. Macroinvertebrate and geomorphic survey reaches sampled in Clackamas County (c), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ............................................................................................. 7 Figure 2. Surficial geology and streams in the CCSD #1 Service Area. Modified from Ma, et al. (2012) ................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3. Annual peak flow data for CCSD #1 .......................................................................................... 47 Figure 4. Graphical Geomorphic data summary ........................................................................................ 52 Figure 5A. Correlation between geomorphic parameters and percent fines in riverbed sampled from reaches in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017.................................................................................................................................... 53 Clackamas County – CCSD #1 i Aquatic Macroinvertebrate and Geomorphic Monitoring - 2017 Figure 5B. Correlation between geomorphic parameters and percent of eroding bank sampled from reaches in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017.................................................................................................................................... 54 Figure 6. Relationships between multimetric scores and PREDATOR O/E model scores of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles in stream reaches in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017. .......................................... 64 Figure 7. Multimetric scores (top panel) and PREDATOR MWCF O/E scores (bottom panel) of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2002, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2017. ....................................................................................................................................... 65 Figure 8. Mean multimetric (upper panels) and mean MWCF O/E (bottom panels) scores of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2002, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2017. Left panels include data from all reach. ............................................................................. 66 Figure 9. Mean multimetric scores of riffles sampled from reaches within three Clackamas County (CCSD # 1) subbasins (Kellogg Creek, n= 2; Mt. Scott Creek, n= 4; and Rock Creek, n= 4), Clackamas River tributaries (n= 2), and the Richardson Creek reach. Samples were collected in the fall of the 2017. ................... 67 Figure 10. Fine sediment stressor model scores (top panel) and temperature stressor scores (bottom panel) of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2002, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2017. Red lines indicate thresholds above which values indicate a stressed condition. ................................................................................................................ 71 Figure 11. Mean temperature stressor scores (upper panels) and mean fine sediment stressor scores (bottom panels) of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2002, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2017. ................................................................................................ 73 Figure 12. Relationships between multimetric scores of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles and select environmental variables in Clackamas County (SWMACC: Solid circles and CCSD # 1: Open circles), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ....................................................................................................................................... 75 Figure 13. Relationships between MWCF O/E scores of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles and select environmental variables in Clackamas County (SWMACC: Solid circles and CCSD # 1: Open circles), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ....................................................................................................................................... 76 Figure 14. Correlation between geomorphic parameters and O/E scores sampled from reaches in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ...................... 82 Clackamas County – CCSD #1 ii Aquatic Macroinvertebrate and Geomorphic Monitoring - 2017 Tables Table 1. Site information for stream reaches where channel morphology assessment was conducted in Clackamas County Service District #1 (CCSD #1), Oregon. ......................................................... 11 Table 2. Environmental parameters measured in the field to characterize stream reaches in the Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon, in the fall of 2017. ...................................................... 18 Table 3: Metric set and scoring criteria (WQIW 1999) used to assess condition of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from riffles in stream reaches within Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon, in the fall of 2017. ........................................................................................ 23 Table 4. Multimetric score ranges for the assignment of macroinvertebrate community condition levels (WQIW 1999). .......................................................................................................................... 23 Table 5. Metric set used to assess condition of macroinvertebrate communities sampled from glides/pools in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ............................ 25 Table 6. Geomorphic data collected in 2017 for long-term monitoring- Clackamas County Service District (CCSD #1), Oregon. ........................................................................................................... 49 Table 7. Channel parameters calculated for each study reach in 2017 - Clackamas County Service District #1 (CCSD #1), Oregon. ..................................................................................................... 50 Table 8. Bed substrate and bank conditions in 2017 for each study reach - Clackamas County Service District #1 (CCSD #1), Oregon. ..................................................................................................... 51 Table 9. Environmental conditions of a lower reach (Cow Creek; M-CO-10), from which glides were sampled and 13 higher-gradient stream reaches in which riffles were sampled for macroinvertebrates in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ................ 56 Table 10. Land uses in the drainage basin upstream of monitoring reaches sampled in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2017. ........................................................................... 57 Table 11. Habitats from which macroinvertebrate samples were collected in monitoring reaches sampled in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon in the fall of 2002, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014, and 2017. ......................................................................................................................... 59 Table 12. Western Oregon multimetric scores and PREDATOR MWCF O/E scores calculated from macroinvertebrate samples collected from riffles in 13 stream reaches in Clackamas County (CCSD #1), Oregon, in the fall of 2017. .......................................................................... 60 Table 13. Multimetric scores calculated for riffle samples collected from stream reaches in Clackamas County (CCSD #1),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Restoration for Native Fish Populations Clackamas Partnership
    Watershed Restoration for Native Fish Populations Clackamas Partnership Strategic Restoration Action Plan July 2018 Strategic Restoration Action Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Clackamas Partnership ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Fish Populations and Geographic Focus ..................................................................................................................... 3 Restoration and Conservation Emphasis.................................................................................................................... 7 2. Ecological Outcomes: Restored Aquatic Habitat and Watershed Processes ...................................................... 9 2025: Targeted Restoration Outcomes .................................................................................................................... 11 3. Scope, Vision, and Guiding Principles ............................................................................................................ 15 Geographic Scope ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Partner Geographic Coverage .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discoveryour Fun! Movies in the Park Recmobile Summer Camps and More!
    summer 2017 GUIDE . Discoveryour fun! movies in the park recmobile summer camps and more! TEAR-OUT SUMMER FUN GUIDE INSIDE! | NCPRD.COM DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE Summer is finally here and the sunshine and warmer weather bring endless possibilities for fun and adventure.As you start planning your summer activities and outdoor excursions, we hope you’ll use this Discovery Guide to explore the many benefits of living and playing in North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District. eW invite you to take advantage of the many programs, classes, and special events available to you and your family this season. NCPRD has something fun for all ages and interest levels, including parks and trails, summer camps, Movies in the Park, RecMobile, Big Surf! at North Clackamas Aquatic Park, and much more! At NCPRD, we believe that everyone should have access to nature, parks, and recreation programming. That’s why we’re constantly striving to better serve our community and help enrich the lives of District residents. Our strategic partnership with North Clackamas School District aims to do just that and would provide new parks and recreation opportunities throughout the District, especially where they’re needed most. As part of the agreement, NCPRD would exchange Hood View Park in Happy Valley for the Concord Elementary School and former NCSD Administration Building in Milwaukie, and appromimately $16M cash. NCSD would get the needed sports complex for their new high school at the Rock Creek campus, and NCPRD would utilize funds from the agreement to pay off debt, freeing up District operating funds. This partnership is a true win-win for the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment
    GREATER OREGON CITY WATERSHED ASSESSMENT P REPARED FOR: Greater Oregon City Watershed Council Oregon City, OR Contact: Rita Baker P REPARED BY: ICF International 317 Alder Street, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97204 Contact: John Runyon 503/525‐6153 & Watershed Professionals Network Corvallis, OR April 2010 ICF International. 2010. Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment. (ICF Project 00223.09.) Portland, OR. Prepared for the Greater Oregon City Watershed Council, Oregon City, OR. Acknowledgements Primary funding for this project was provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board. We thank Wendy Hudson, Willamette Basin Program Representative, for her support and guidance. Additional funding was provided by the Clackamas County Soil and Water Conservation District. The group of dedicated volunteers, from the watershed council members, the technical advisory committee, and agency staff, attended meetings and provided thoughtful review comments on the draft assessment. The final product is much stronger due to their dedication and commitment to this project. We thank: Council: Eric Hand, Chair Cara Hughes, Vice‐Chair Doug Neeley, Treasurer Alison Heimowitz, Secretary Sarah Miller, Past Chair, Citizen‐at‐large Sammy Warner, Watershed Resident Dan Tooze, Watershed Resident Jeff Stott, Citizen‐at‐large Technical Assistance Committee: Mark Mouser, Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development Isaac Sanders, ODFW‐North Willamette Watershed District Doug Cramer, Portland General Electric Dave Phipps, Stonecreek Golf Course Anders Rasmussen, HDR Contributors: Jeffrey Kee, Past TAC Chair Clair Klock, Clackamas County Soil & Watershed Conservation District Brian Vaughn, Metro Tonia Burns, Clackamas County Parks Coordinator, Rita Baker Greater Oregon City Watershed Council April 2010 i Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment ICF 00223.09 Contents List of Tables and Figures .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Kronberg Nature Park Master Plan Final Report 04.20.2015 This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    CITY OF MILWAUKIE & NORTH CLACKAMAS PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT ROBERT KRONBERG NATURE PARK MASTER PLAN FINAL REPORT 04.20.2015 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 ROBERT KRONBERG NATURE PARK MASTER PLAN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS NCPRD BOARD OF DIRECTORS MILWAUKIE CITY COUNCIL (CLACKAMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS) Council President Lisa Batey Chair John Ludlow Karin Power Vice Chair Jim Bernard Mark Gamba Martha Schrader Scott Churchill Paul Savas Tootie Smith MILWAUKIE PARK AND RECREATION BOARD (PARB) DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD (DAB) Lisa Gunion-Rinker, Chair Lisa Lashbrook, Vice Chair David Noble, Chair Erin Willett Holcomb Bill Bersie Lynn Sharp Kristin Mitchell Ray Harris Lynn Fisher Tony Andersen Michael Morrow Robin Condie CITY OF MILWAUKIE Susan McCarty Tony Andersen Steve Butler, Community Development Director Jason Rice, Engineering Director NORTH CLACKAMAS PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT Gary Barth, Director SPECIAL THANKS TO: Jeroen Kok, Strategic Planning, Development, and Residents of NCPRD and the City of Milwaukie who Resource Manager contributed to this master planning process. Katie Dunham, CPRP, Senior Planner Kevin Cayson, Park Maintenance Supervisor For more Information, contact: Tonia Burns, Natural Resource Coordinator NCPRD 150 Beavercreek Road, 4th Floor LANGO HANSEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS Oregon City, OR 97045 Kurt Lango, RLA, Principal 503-742-4348 Andrew Sheie, RLA, Associate www.ncprd.com PACIFIC HABITAT SERVICES John van Staveren Fred Small ROBERT KRONBERG NATURE PARK MASTER PLAN 3 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4 ROBERT KRONBERG NATURE PARK MASTER PLAN ROBERT KRONBERG NATURE PARK MASTER PLAN INTRODUCTION Robert Kronberg Park is an undeveloped natural area park located just south of downtown Milwaukie, Oregon. The property is owned by the City of Milwaukie and maintained by North Clackamas Parks and Recreation District (NCPRD).
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan City of Milwaukie
    ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF MILWAUKIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN JANUARY 2020 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Introduction Land Use Categories CITY OF MILWAUKIE Community & Culture COMMUNITY VISION Stewardship & Resiliency In 2040, Milwaukie is a flourishing city that is entirely equitable, Complete Neighborhoods delightfully livable, and completely sustainable. It is a safe and welcoming community whose residents enjoy secure and Economic meaningful work, a comprehensive educational system, and Development & Growth affordable housing. A complete network of sidewalks, bike lanes, and paths along with well-maintained streets and a Transportation robust transit system connect our neighborhood centers. Art and creativity are woven into the fabric of the city. Glossary Appendices Milwaukie’s neighborhoods are the centers of daily life, with each containing amenities and community-minded local Ancillary Documents businesses that meet residents’ needs. Our industrial areas are magnets for innovation, and models for environmentally- sensitive manufacturing and high wage jobs. Our residents can easily access the training and education needed to win those jobs. Milwaukie nurtures a verdant canopy of beneficial trees, promotes sustainable development, and is a net-zero energy city. The Willamette River, Johnson Creek, and Kellogg Creek are free flowing, and accessible. Their ecosystems are protected by a robust stormwater treatment system and enhanced by appropriate riparian vegetation. Milwaukie is a resilient community, adaptive to the realities of a changing climate, and prepared for emergencies, such as the Cascadia Event. Milwaukie’s government is transparent and accessible, and is committed to promoting tolerance and inclusion and eliminating disparities. It strongly encourages engagement and participation by all and nurtures a deep sense of community through celebrations and collective action.
    [Show full text]
  • CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Clackamas County
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Clackamas County Community Community Name Number BARLOW, CITY OF 410013 CANBY, CITY OF 410014 DAMASCUS, CITY OF 410006 *ESTACADA, CITY OF 410016 GLADSTONE, CITY OF 410017 HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF 410026 *JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF 410267 LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF 410018 MILWAUKIE, CITY OF 410019 *MOLALLA, CITY OF 410020 OREGON CITY, CITY OF 410021 RIVERGROVE, CITY OF 410022 SANDY, CITY OF 410023 WEST LINN, CITY OF 410024 WILSONVILLE, CITY OF 410025 CLACKAMAS COUNTY 415588 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) *No Special Flood Hazard Areas Identified REVISED: JANUARY 18, 2019 Reprinted with corrections on December 6, 2019 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41005CV001B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide Effective Date: June 17, 2008 Revised Countywide Date: January 18, 2019 This FIS report was reissued on December 6, 2019 to make corrections; this version replaces any previous versions.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oral History of Kellogg Lake
    An Oral History of Kellogg Lake By Nicole West City of Milwaukie December, 2009 An Oral History of Kellogg Lake; Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Methodology a. Preliminary Research of Non-Oral Sources 1 b. Citizen Interviews 2 c. Weaknesses of the Study 2 3. Historical Context a. Early Significance of Waterways on Regional Settlement 3 b. The Old Standard Mill and Origin of Kellogg Dam 5 4. An Oral History 1918-Present a. The Early Days; Enjoying Kellogg Lake 8 b. The Decline of Kellogg Lake 31 c. Kellogg Lake Today; The Milwaukie Presbyterian Church 37 d. Responding to Change; the Future of Kellogg Lake 38 5. Conclusions; Remembering Kellogg Lake 40 6. Appendix; News Articles and Images 1852-Present 42 Introduction Kellogg Lake has been a central geographical feature in Milwaukie for over 160 years, but today most Milwaukie citizens, even the Lake’s immediate neighbors, have little interaction with it. Technically speaking, Kellogg Lake is a man-made “impoundment” with a surface area of about 14 acres. Originally, Kellogg Creek was dammed to power the Standard Mill in 1858 and it served as a mill pond for about three decades. According to the US Army Corps of Engineers (2002), the original stream channel has become masked deep within the lakebed by about 17,500 cubic yards of sediment that is contaminated above legal standards set by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for both DDT and Chlordane. It has experienced frequent sewer overflows and is the recipient of a significant amount of stormwater runoff from surrounding residential properties, Lake Rd, and McLoughlin Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Community Community Name Number BARLOW, CITY OF 410013 CANBY, CITY OF 410014 DAMASCUS, CITY OF 410006 *ESTACADA, CITY OF 410016 GLADSTONE, CITY OF 410017 HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF 410026 *JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF 410267 LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF 410018 MILWAUKIE, CITY OF 410019 *MOLALLA, CITY OF 410020 OREGON CITY, CITY OF 410021 RIVERGROVE, CITY OF 410022 SANDY, CITY OF 410023 WEST LINN, CITY OF 410024 WILSONVILLE, CITY OF 410025 CLACKAMAS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 415588 *Non-floodprone EFFECTIVE: JUNE 17, 2008 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41005CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON and INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3
    CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON AND INCORPORATED AREAS Volume 1 of 3 Community Community Name Number BARLOW, CITY OF 410013 CANBY, CITY OF 410014 DAMASCUS, CITY OF 410006 *ESTACADA, CITY OF 410016 GLADSTONE, CITY OF 410017 HAPPY VALLEY, CITY OF 410026 *JOHNSON CITY, CITY OF 410267 LAKE OSWEGO, CITY OF 410018 MILWAUKIE, CITY OF 410019 *MOLALLA, CITY OF 410020 OREGON CITY, CITY OF 410021 RIVERGROVE, CITY OF 410022 SANDY, CITY OF 410023 WEST LINN, CITY OF 410024 WILSONVILLE, CITY OF 410025 CLACKAMAS COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 415588 *Non-floodprone EFFECTIVE: JUNE 17, 2008 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 41005CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current Flood Insurance Study components. TABLE OF CONTENTS – Volume 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Study................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Milwaukie, Oregon, by Charles Oluf Olson
    HISTORY OF NJLLWAUKIE, OREGON by Charles Oluf Olson An unfinished manuscript prepared for the FEDERAL WRITERS' PROJECT OF THE WORKS PROGRESS A[XYIINISTRATION Undated Presented to the Oregon Historical Society With Certain Additions and Corrections By Members of the Milwaukie Historical Society and Other Nilwaukie Citizens Issued by the Milwaukie Historical Society Milwaukie, Oregon 1965 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE page 1 THE NAME NILWAUKIE page 2 I INDIAN DAYS page 3 II A TOWN IS BORN page 7 III PUBLIC EXPRESSION: THE WESTERN STAR page 10 IV TRANSPORTATION: THE 'LOT WHITCOMB'.............page 14 V AGRICULTEJRE page 33 VI INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE page 42 VII CIVIC ASPECTS page 51 VIII CULTURAL AFFAIRS page 54 IX THE NILWAUKIE LIBRARY page 59 X SCHOOLS page 61 XI CHURCHES page 67 XII VOICES OF THE PEOPLE page 72 XIII OUTSTANDING FIGURES page 77 XIV MILWAUKEE WILLOWS page 79 XV LUELLING'S TREK: IOWA TOMILWAUKIE.............page 80 XVI MILWAUKIE CE2{ERIES page 84 XVII HONEY BEES IN THE NORTHWEST page 86 Xviii MILWAUKIE GROWS UP page 88 XIX MILWAUKIE CITY GOVERNMENT page 91 XX.........NORTH CLACKAMAS COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE page 94 XXI THE NAME: LLEWELLYN? LUELLING?LEWELLING'......page 96 XXII MILWAUKIE HIGHLIGHTS page 98 XXIII NILWAUKIE: BIBLIOGRAPHICAL COMMENTS page 100 History of Milwaukie PREFACE This story of early Milwaukie--its people, its founding, its economic and cultural life--is largely the work of a group of literary people under the Federal Writers' Project of the Works Progress Admin- istration during the 1930's. The manuscript was written by Charles Oluf Olson. It is fully documented both by the newspaper accounts of a hundred years ago or more and by more recent stories of this pioneer community.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Status of Oregon Populations of Natural Coho Salmon Spawners in the Lower Columbia River, 2002 E. T. Brown S
    Assessment of the Status of Oregon Populations of Natural Coho Salmon Spawners in the Lower Columbia River, 2002 E. T. Brown S. E. Jacobs D. A. Kreager Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 3406 Cherry Drive N. E. Salem, Oregon 97303 September 2003 This work was financed in part by the Columbia River Fisheries Development Program (Mitchell Act) administered by NOAA Fisheries, Project NA17FH1628. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 1 MONITORING DESIGN............................................................................................ 2 METHODS................................................................................................................ 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................................. 6 Assessment of Survey Conditions........................................................................ 6 Spawn Timing ......................................................................................................... 8 Spawning Distribution.......................................................................................... 13 Coded-Wire Tag Recoveries ................................................................................ 15 Trends In Spawner Abundance ........................................................................... 17 Estimates of Spawner
    [Show full text]