DOCSLIB.ORG

Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment GREATER OREGON CITY WATERSHED ASSESSMENT P REPARED FOR: Greater Oregon City Watershed Council Oregon City, OR Contact: Rita Baker P REPARED BY: ICF International 317 Alder Street, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97204 Contact: John Runyon 503/525‐6153 & Watershed Professionals Network Corvallis, OR April 2010 ICF International. 2010. Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment. (ICF Project 00223.09.) Portland, OR. Prepared for the Greater Oregon City Watershed Council, Oregon City, OR. Acknowledgements Primary funding for this project was provided by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board. We thank Wendy Hudson, Willamette Basin Program Representative, for her support and guidance. Additional funding was provided by the Clackamas County Soil and Water Conservation District. The group of dedicated volunteers, from the watershed council members, the technical advisory committee, and agency staff, attended meetings and provided thoughtful review comments on the draft assessment. The final product is much stronger due to their dedication and commitment to this project. We thank: Council: Eric Hand, Chair Cara Hughes, Vice‐Chair Doug Neeley, Treasurer Alison Heimowitz, Secretary Sarah Miller, Past Chair, Citizen‐at‐large Sammy Warner, Watershed Resident Dan Tooze, Watershed Resident Jeff Stott, Citizen‐at‐large Technical Assistance Committee: Mark Mouser, Clackamas County Department of Transportation and Development Isaac Sanders, ODFW‐North Willamette Watershed District Doug Cramer, Portland General Electric Dave Phipps, Stonecreek Golf Course Anders Rasmussen, HDR Contributors: Jeffrey Kee, Past TAC Chair Clair Klock, Clackamas County Soil & Watershed Conservation District Brian Vaughn, Metro Tonia Burns, Clackamas County Parks Coordinator, Rita Baker Greater Oregon City Watershed Council April 2010 i Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment ICF 00223.09 Contents List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... iv List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... vi Introduction and Purpose .................................................................................................................... 1 Watershed Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3 Watershed Assessment Area ................................................................................................................. 3 Land Use and Land Cover ....................................................................................................................... 6 Natural Areas ................................................................................................................................. 10 Geology .......................................................................................................................................... 10 Riparian and Wetland Areas .............................................................................................................. 13 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Riparian Area Assessment .................................................................................................................... 13 Invasive Plant Species ........................................................................................................................... 16 Forested Riparian Areas and Contributions of Large Wood ................................................................. 17 Stream Shade ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Wetland Habitat Loss ........................................................................................................................... 19 Floods and Water Use ........................................................................................................................ 22 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 22 Streamflow Patterns ............................................................................................................................. 22 Flood History ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Water Use ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Locations of Water Withdrawals ................................................................................................... 28 Withdrawal Rates ........................................................................................................................... 29 Effects of Water Withdrawals on Flow Regime ............................................................................. 31 Surface Erosion and Stream Sediment ................................................................................................ 32 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Bank Erosion ......................................................................................................................................... 32 Upland Surface Erosion ........................................................................................................................ 32 Water Quality .................................................................................................................................... 35 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Relationship to Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 36 Water Temperature .............................................................................................................................. 37 Toxics .................................................................................................................................................... 37 Greater Oregon City Watershed Council April 2010 ii Greater Oregon City Watershed Assessment ICF 00223.09 Stormwater Quality .............................................................................................................................. 38 pH ................................................................................................................................................... 39 Total Dissolved Solids ..................................................................................................................... 39 Total Suspended Solids .................................................................................................................. 40 Aquatic Habitat and Fish Populations ................................................................................................. 45 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 45 Overview of Fish Presence and Distribution ........................................................................................ 45 Coho Salmon .................................................................................................................................. 47 Winter Steelhead ........................................................................................................................... 48 Cutthroat Trout .............................................................................................................................. 48 Lamprey and Other Fish Species .................................................................................................... 49 Abernethy Creek: Fish Use and Habitat ............................................................................................... 50 Backwatering in Abernethy Creek and Fish Use ............................................................................ 52 Abernethy Tributary Streams ........................................................................................................ 54 Beaver Creek: Fish Use and Habitat ..................................................................................................... 57 Fish Passage Barriers ............................................................................................................................ 57 Dams .............................................................................................................................................. 58 Road Crossings ............................................................................................................................... 59 Summary and Recommendations....................................................................................................... 62 References ......................................................................................................................................... 65 Appendix A. Water Quality Data Sources, Criteria, and Stormwater
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Overview
    HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT The following is a brief history of Oregon City. The intent is to provide a general overview, rather than a comprehensive history. Setting Oregon City, the county seat of Clackamas County, is located southeast of Portland on the east side of the Willamette River, just below the falls. Its unique topography includes three terraces, which rise above the river, creating an elevation range from about 50 feet above sea level at the riverbank to more than 250 feet above sea level on the upper terrace. The lowest terrace, on which the earliest development occurred, is only two blocks or three streets wide, but stretches northward from the falls for several blocks. Originally, industry was located primarily at the south end of Main Street nearest the falls, which provided power. Commercial, governmental and social/fraternal entities developed along Main Street north of the industrial area. Religious and educational structures also appeared along Main Street, but tended to be grouped north of the commercial core. Residential structures filled in along Main Street, as well as along the side and cross streets. As the city grew, the commercial, governmental and social/fraternal structures expanded northward first, and with time eastward and westward to the side and cross streets. Before the turn of the century, residential neighborhoods and schools were developing on the bluff. Some commercial development also occurred on this middle terrace, but the business center of the city continued to be situated on the lower terrace. Between the 1930s and 1950s, many of the downtown churches relocated to the bluff as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Falls Recertification Review Report 2018
    Willamette Falls (LIHI # 33) Recertification Review Report Introduction and Overview This report reviews the application submitted by Portland General Electric (applicant) to the Low Impact Hydropower Institute (LIHI) for LIHI recertification for the Willamette Falls Hydroelectric Project (Facility) located on the Willamette River in Clackamas County, Oregon. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) relicensed the project (FERC 2233) in 2005 for the operation and maintenance of the 15.18 megawatt run-of-river project. This application review for recertification was conducted using the new, 2nd Edition Handbook that was published in March 2016. Background: The project is located at river mile 26.5 on the Willamette River within the city limits of Oregon City (to the east) and West Linn (to the west) in north-central Oregon, approximately 10 miles from Portland and 40 miles from the Willamette’s confluence with the Columbia River. The project is located in a populated, industrial urban setting at the site of Willamette Falls, a natural waterfall that marks the head of the tidally influenced lower Willamette River. The applicant has operated hydroelectric facilities at the site since 1889. Willamette Falls (the Falls) is a horseshoe-shaped, 40-foot-high, natural waterfall that marks the head of the tidally influenced lower Willamette River. The general project area has been home to hydroelectric generation for more than 125 years, beginning with PGE’s Station A in 1889 and continuing to this day with PGE’s T.W. Sullivan (TWS) Powerhouse, built in 1895. Multiple paper mills have also operated at the Falls for more than a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishway Ladder
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS A. Fishway B. Riverwalk C. DNR Compliance with NR 333 D. Dam Removal E. Property Issues F. Fish and Aquatic Life G. Wildlife H. Recreational Use A. Fishway 1. What is the estimated cost to build a fishway at Bridge Street dam? The engineering consultant, Bonestroo, has estimated the cost at $1.3 million per the NOAA grant. 2. If the fishway is constructed next year, will it have to be rebuilt when the dam needs to be removed and replaced? Essentially no. Most of the fishway is a separate upstream structure and will not be impacted by demolition and construction of a new dam. The fishway entrance area may need to be modified if a new dam is installed or if the dam abutments are altered. 3. Why is the fishway being constructed on the west bank of the river? The west bank allows land owned by the Village of Grafton to be used for a portion of the channel alignment. Furthermore, the heaviest construction will likely be in the area currently owned by the Village (penetration of the west dam abutment). Other advantages include the appeal to tourists able to view fish entering and ascending the fishway from the riverwalk, and the known presence of shallow bedrock helping assure good foundation characteristics. Furthermore, the historic mill race crosses the area, and a portion of the mill race alignment may assist with fishway construction. 4. How long will it take to complete the construction of the fishway? The fishway will be completed by late fall of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Download the 4Th Grade Curriculum
    Copyright © 2014 The Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon. All rights reserved. All materials in this curriculum are copyrighted as designated. Any republication, retransmission, reproduction, or sale of all or part of this curriculum is prohibited. Introduction Welcome to the Grand Ronde Tribal History curriculum unit. We are thankful that you are taking the time to learn and teach this curriculum to your class. This unit has truly been a journey. It began as a pilot project in the fall of 2013 that was brought about by the need in Oregon schools for historically accurate and culturally relevant curriculum about Oregon Native Americans and as a response to countless requests from Oregon teachers for classroom- ready materials on Native Americans. The process of creating the curriculum was a Tribal wide effort. It involved the Tribe’s Education Department, Tribal Library, Land and Culture Department, Public Affairs, and other Tribal staff. The project would not have been possible without the support and direction of the Tribal Council. As the creation was taking place the Willamina School District agreed to serve as a partner in the project and allow their fourth grade teachers to pilot it during the 2013-2014 academic year. It was also piloted by one teacher from the Pleasant Hill School District. Once teachers began implementing the curriculum, feedback was received regarding the effectiveness of lesson delivery and revisions were made accordingly. The teachers allowed Tribal staff to visit during the lessons to observe how students responded to the curriculum design and worked after school to brainstorm new strategies for the lessons and provide insight from the classroom teacher perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019
    FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA 2019 37.2’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region June 2019 Fish and Aquatic Conservation, Fish Passage Engineering Ecological Services, Conservation Planning Assistance United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA June 2019 This manual replaces all previous editions of the Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Suggested citation: USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria. USFWS, Northeast Region R5, Hadley, Massachusetts. USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. x List of Equations ............................................................................................................................ xi List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xii 1 Scope of this Document ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Role of the USFWS Region 5 Fish Passage Engineering ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage Profiles Evaluation Report
    Potter Valley Project Ad Hoc Committee Fish Passage Profiles Evaluation Report December 2019 Developed by the Fish Passage Working Group Fish Passage Working Group Report Contributors Scenarios and Options Subgroup Scoring Subgroup Craig Addley (Consultant to PG&E) Craig Addley (Consultant to PG&E) Joshua Fuller (NMFS) Joshua Fuller (NMFS) Paul Kubicek (PG&E) Damon Goodman (USFWS) Jon Mann (CDFW) Paul Kubicek (PG&E) David Manning (Sonoma Water) Jon Mann (CDFW) Scott McBain (Consultant to RVIT) David Manning (Sonoma Water) Darren Mierau (CalTrout) Scott McBain (Consultant to RVIT) Steve Thomas (NMFS) Darren Mierau (CalTrout) Allen Renger (CDFW) Steve Thomas (NMFS) Larry Wise (PG&E) The scenarios subgroup developed the conceptual passage scenarios and options. The scoring subgroup developed and used a passage scoring matrix to evaluate the passage options. Facilitation Team Facilitators Gina Bartlett and Stephanie Horii of Consensus Building Institute assisted the subgroups to document the process and compile results into this final report. 2 Executive Summary Background and Purpose The Potter Valley Project on the Eel River is a set of hydroelectric facilities that includes two large dams (Scott and Cape Horn), water-diversion facilities, and a powerhouse. The project involves an inter-basin transfer that stores winter runoff from the upper Eel River and diverts much of that water to the Russian River to generate hydroelectric power and meet contract water demands. Scott Dam, which creates Lake Pillsbury, is a complete barrier to native fish species, preventing access to high value habitat for federally Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed anadromous salmonids. To balance diverse Potter Valley Project interests, Congressman Jared Huffman established an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of representative stakeholder groups across four counties, who have agreed to work collaboratively towards a two-basin solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Open House Summary Report
    Nimbus Hatchery Fish Passage Project Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report Open House Summary Report Rancho Cordova, California US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation California Department of Fish and Game February 2011 Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview of the Public Involvement Process ..............................................1 1.2 Description of the Public Involvement Process to Date ..............................2 2. Meeting Overview ..................................................................................................5 3. Comment Summary ...............................................................................................7 4. Future Steps ............................................................................................................9 4.1 Summary of Future Steps and Public Participation Opportunities ..............9 4.2 Contact Information .....................................................................................9 Table Page 3-1 Summary of Comments ...........................................................................................8 Appendix Draft EIS/EIR Public Involvement Materials Nimbus Hatchery Fish Passage Project EIS/EIR February 2011 Open House Summary Report i Acronyms Acronym Full Phrase CCAO Central California Area Office CCR California Code of Regulations CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CEQA California
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Portland, UNITED STATES
    GGGeeennneeesss,,, BBBrrraaaiiinnn,,, aaannnddd BBBeeehhhaaavvviiiooorrr Tenth Annual Meeting of the International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society May 5‐9, 2008 University Place Hotel and Conference Center 310 SW Lincoln Street at SW 3rd Avenue, Tel. 503.221.0140 Portland, Oregon USA Sponsored by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, USA National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, USA National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, USA Exhibitors: Noldus Program Committee: Kari Buck (Chair), John Crabbe, Daniel Goldowitz, Andrew Holmes, Helen Kamens, Charalambos Kyriacou, Richard Nowakowski, Inga Poletaeva, Oliver Stork Local Organizers: Kari Buck, John Crabbe, Tamara Phillips, Mark Rutledge‐Gorman Genes, Brain, and Behavior May 5‐9, 2008 Table of Contents Page Conference Program Schedule at‐a‐Glance 3 Hotel Map of Conference Meeting and Event Locations 3 Portland Downtown Map 4 General Information 5‐6 Accommodation and Emergency Contact Banking and Currency Exchange Cultural, Recreation and Athletic Activities E‐mail and Internet Access Emergency Telephone Numbers Medical and Dental Treatment Name Badge Parking Posters Responsibility Smoking Taxes Transportation in the Portland Area From Portland International Airport (PDX) to University Place Hotel Transportation: Streetcars, Buses, Taxis Tram (Aerial) to Oregon Health & Science University IBANGS Award Winners 7 Conference Program Schedule ‐ Detailed 8‐14 Wineries Tour
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage at Dams Strategic Analysis
    Fish Passage at Dams Strategic Analysis Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources February 5, 2018 Nature-like Fishway at Thiensville Dam on Milwaukee River in Ozaukee County, WI Table of Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1 History of Fish Passage at Dams Policy in Wisconsin ............................................................................ 7 2 Regulatory Framework and Department Procedures and Guidelines ................................................ 11 3 Types of Fish Passage .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Upstream Fish Passage Technologies ......................................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Fishways (Passive) ............................................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Fish Lifts and Locks (Active) ................................................................................................ 26 3.2.3 Collection and Transport (Active) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Chittenden Locks 47
    Seattle’s Aquatic Environments: Hiram M. Chittenden Locks Hiram M. Chittenden Locks The following write-up relies heavily on the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks/Salmon Bay Subarea Chapter by Fred Goetz in the Draft Reconnaissance Assessment – Habitat Factors that Contribute to the Decline of Salmonids by the Greater Lake Washington Technical Committee (2001). Overview The Hiram M. Chittenden Locks (Locks) were Operation of the navigational locks involves constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers raising or lowering the water level within either (the Corps) in 1916 and commissioned in 1917. the large or small lock chamber so that vessels may The Locks were built as a navigation project to pass between the two waterbodies. The filling and allow boats to travel from the marine waters of emptying of the large lock chamber is achieved by Puget Sound to the protected freshwaters of Lake use of a system of two large conduits that can Union and Lake Washington. The Locks are either fill the entire lock or half of the lock. This comprised of two navigational lock chambers: a is achieved by using a miter gate that divides the large lock that accommodates both large and small large lock chamber into two sections. Water is vessels and a small lock used by smaller vessels. In taken into the conduits via two culvert intakes addition to the lock chambers, the Locks include a located immediately upstream of the structure. dam, 6 spillway bays, and a fish ladder. Water is conveyed through each conduit and is The Locks form a dam at the outlet of the Lake discharged into the lock chamber through outlet Washington and Lake Union/Ship Canal system culverts on each side of the chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • THS Newsletter Nov Dec 2010.Pub
    Tualatin Historical Society Newsletter NOVEMBER/DECEMBERJune 20082010 Founded in 1986, the Society’s mission is to preserve, promote and interpret the rich and colorful history of Tualatin Save the Date… Annual Meeting and Potluck November 7 Good old-fashioned The 2010 Lafky-Martinazzi potluck fare and con- Award for exceptional service versation will high- to THS will be revealed dur- “The Valley of the Giants” light the 2010 annual ing the afternoon. Each February, in com- meeting of Tualatin Historical Soci- Come celebrate accomplishments and memoration of the opening ety this Sunday, November 7 at Tu- anticipate activities on the horizon. of the Tualatin Heritage alatin Heritage Center starting at Election of officers for 2011 will also Center in 2006, the Tuala- 1:00 p.m. There will be no regu- be conducted. tin Historical Society lar meeting on November 3. Bring presents a look at some as- You might also be a winner in our pect of Tualatin history. your own table service as well as a drawing for special prizes. All comers The next “look” will take favorite dish to share. Beverages get a ticket. We might also test your us back in time to what will be provided. Tualatin history IQ. Tualatin was like some l5,000 years ago when the Annual THS Wine Tasting and Auction Nets $6500 area was home to giant animals, long extinct, and Despite the heavy rain, a fun eve- was periodically deluged ning was had by all. The event fea- by tumultuous icy floods. It turing Northwest wines, tasty food was the Ice Age, and the and live music from Island Trio presenters will show and helped approximately 100 guests tell the story of our ice-age raise $6500 after expenses to help past and the evidence that THS continue its mission.
    [Show full text]