Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ffcso h urn giutrlidsr n hudb ecmdatraie ocretpractices. current to alternatives reasons, welcomed these For be should [10]. and 73% industry as agricultural high current as population the estimated world of increases that effects consumption and estimated use, meat is land that with It vitro lower 2050 speculated 99% [9]. in by emissions, products been billion gas between has 9 house comparisons green tip It on lower will depending 75-95% hypocrites. use usage, deforestation, people water energy are Essentially, lower less to meat 50% 80-95% contributes [8]. to eat planet, up emissions but in the gas environmentalists result on may greenhouse brief, be In land and to arable resistance, claim discussion. antibiotic the who own contamination, of its for and amount topic waste immense a water an is and uses tremendous agriculture is agriculture animal animal on impact environmental The Environmental: Considerations Ethical and into Environmental dive “cultured Why? as well meat”, as “clean done, meat”, be “lab-grown can include it technology how agriculture.” this “cellular of why to or use details concerning meat,” I references the technology. detail common explaining the significant other surrounding on however into misconceptions focus and going my questions avoid turn common intentionally rather will and [known] I beneficial 4 post, spawned since this has In and strategy the for awareness raise Israel-based Dutch-based to [5], – done idea purposefully the was pursuing muscle event companies The grow to 4]. possible [3, of be Winston tag would price first it cool world’s techniques, time. the of culture long consumption cell a and meat) traditional for novel utilizing (i.e. around fiction by cells been science perhaps has old compilation that the animals 1932 realized in of his mentioned in need was concept the niculture” the without mentioned consumption famously meat Churchill of idea The Introduction here: note: 2020 28, April 1 Swartz Elliot Meat Lab-Grown Behind Science The CA-Uiest fClfri,LsAngeles Los California, of University - UCLA https://elliot-swartz.squarespace.com/science-related/invitromeat hsmtra scpe rmabo otfo ac 5 07 hc a eadtoal viewed additionally be can which 2017, 15, March from post blog a from copied is material This etadohrarclua ehooisoe h potnt osvrl iiaeteharmful the mitigate severely to opportunity the offer technologies agricultural other and meat 1 Supermeat $ nvitro in 3,0 wihwsatal i i-ersne n nlddcs fstigu h lab) the up setting of cost included and mis-represented bit a actually was (which 330,000 o osmto.Ti elzto a umntdi 03wt h presentation the with 2013 in culminated was realization This consumption. for ,adJapan-based and [6], nvitro in oaMeats Mosa ugrcetdb akPs n uddb egyBi iha with Brin Sergey by funded and Post Mark by created burger Shojinmeat 1 Mr otscmay,U.S.-based company), Post’s (Mark pc Viking Space [7]. huhsadAdventures and Thoughts .Mr eety cetsshave scientists recently, More [2]. nvitro in “nads” throughout, dish”) a (“in . nvitro in epi Meats Memphis nvitro in n “car- and [1] etcnbe can meat meat Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. a hnueteegntcmresi re oprf pcfi eltpso neet–sc stestliecell. satellite the as such – by interest of marked types be cell can specific myotube purify to skeletal order bonafide in [ a markers type genetic of cell these each formation use in the then expressed can precede are that that mesoderm, types genes [ paraxial specific cell fat and brown specific system, and circulatory the the bone, splits Thus, of muscle, it parts where smooth specialized. and streak muscle, muscle primitive become skeletal the heart cells forms from forms as which arises which mechanisms mesoderm plate, rapidly the lateral signaling changes differentiation, genes the biological muscle these into skeletal other of of regulation and by context the dictated gradients the development, are In morphogen part During types cell to in sarcopenia. genes. specialized of which as response material, set known starting age, in particular genetic condition with a same a of the decreases contains age, expression differentiate the body they your and as in self-renew mass cell Satellite each to muscle While lose cells cells.” steadily satellite “satellite the people these or in why [ “myosatellite” of exist explain as fibers ability cells” may cells The muscle progenitor these “neural skeletal to – refer refer the stress. them We we along houses muscle, which skeletal sit or cues. type In cells biological cells tissue other stem the or adult instance. injury, on of for death, reservoirs based brain, cell contain cells to body progenitor response human these in the to activated in become (organs) current can tissues which in specialized ‘progenitors’ used cells. of commonly stem majority most adult vast type and The the iPSCs concerning are Together, as biology well and layer. the can as cells germ (ectoderm, of development which single stem Much layers a on types “adult” within cell as germ always therapies. to progenitor not cell 3 referred but are stem disease induced usually commonly all cells and types, and are stem development of cell cells cells Multipotent study of cells these stem number to medicine. Embryonic limited into research regenerative a academic differentiate into therapeutic in differentiate development. in can used of as commonly that the stage well are of cell cells as and cells a 16 are endoderm) including instance, or body, and For stem (iPSCs) 8 Totipotent the mesoderm, the cells of until [14]. placenta. type stem the cell up types as pluripotent any roughly cell known into exist other collectively differentiate tissues into only can types extra-embryonic differentiate cells many that the are to up cell There make ability stem which or a trophoblast type. is potency cell cell their another stem into by (change) totipotent defined differentiate cells, or self-renew stem to of ability its by defined cell understand to order In Cell Satellite The Growing of emerge. rationalize Process alternatives to of and perform The passing technologies people the new most How? as through that gymnastics reasonable seen wrapped mental less be images meat the and through can but of farming less remain chunk wrong factory become to a not of choices realities up this is everyday the pick meat for their reveal of we Eating will to when out wish [13]. political remain process who videos the the those farming or And prosecute from factory literally removed of store. that far available laws realities grocery so ‘Ag-gag’ of the the are amount America, at the we the in for as plastic given least justification mind in limited At the of is to the such, out societies. consumption claim As by and human today’s difficult sight disgust for of sentient extremely pain. part some not in an feel their the are in be upon to etc) on alternatives to would ability pigs, endured looked come it cows, and suffering (chicken, be Klein emotions, as and farming consciousness, will otherwise cruelty Ezra factory own imagine in that and their used to Ferriss ills with commonly hard Tim creatures animals societal It’s the as today’s that well saying of [11,12]. as support future one Bloom the is Paul of farming and humans Harris factory Sam that both conclusion podcasts, recent In Ethical: nvitro in et n uthv uc rmro tmcl ilg.Ase eli a is cell stem A biology. cell stem on primer quick a have must one meat, iue1 Figure nvitro in iue3 Figure hr hyaatatvto nrsos oijr or injury to response in activation await they where ] nvitro in 2 Meat .Bsdo u nweg fdvlpet we development, of knowledge our on Based ]. etwl edrvdfo htw nwbased know we what from derived be will meat iue2 Figure ]. Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. iue2 iue2 tpiedvlpeto eoemltsu n h dl eltpspoue.From produced. types cell adult the and tissue mesodermal of ( development 2016 Stepwise al, et 2: Loh Figure 2: Figure caption fibers.a muscle forms 1: Figure iue1 Figure http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.011 ceai hwn aelt elligajcn oa niiulmsl elwhich cell muscle individual an to adjacent lying cell satellite a showing Schematic : 3 ). Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. fsroei raiaint civ otatl ucinlt hog h oriae s fatn , , characteristics of form use to coordinated changes the through structural functionality undergoes where contractile ( markers, cell achieve myotubes molecular to the important differentiated organization internally of sarcomeric terminally changes, staining of neighboring mark genetic on other MHC these based with and with starvation identified fuse serum current be Mrf4, and upon can , align usually here of is will cells vitro which up-regulation The in myocyte performed a when later). into which expres- (discussed myoblast myotubes, gene important regula- a multinucleated alter both form gene from factors to MYOD, cell a transcription myocytes and the these through MYF5 transition, transform myoblasts of this to proliferative up-regulation During sion into identity. and PAX7 muscle turn for of will factors regulation cells transcription down satellite involves which activated shift 3, tion Figure later). However, in to (discussed shown necessary altogether be As biopsies. food) only for for therefore choose may sense, it to classical Muscle future, characteristics the Creating the (in cells’ In farming their the for normal. eliminate selected population as to cell been life exists have satellite its possibility that the living the animals on sorted, expanded go few and Once can PAX7 a it have 19]. as animal, such 18, the markers 17, for for 16, As staining [15, immunocytochemical satellite CD11b with the confirmed both and of case, be CD31, types surface this can Integrin the CD45, cell In as on Sca1, such of etc). expressed proteins for separation shape, proteins for negative (size, positive specific the features population via for other a sorting typically allow or antibody-based cell, surface processes utilize their methods these on am then these Essentially, present I can of proteins Although researchers the MACS). on anesthesia, cells. or [usually] individual local (FACS based separate under protocol to head sorting tissue eraser the cell an of of digestion size enzymatic unsure the following cells roughly satellite biopsy isolate muscle a taking By Muscle From Cells Satellite Obtaining differentiation. muscle skeletal ). 10.1101/cshperspect.a008342 delineate that (doi: changes 2012. factor transcription al., of at overview Bentzinger An From 3: Figure 3: Figure exactly o oiestlieclsaeioae,i slkl hog urset rmgei-activated magnetic- or fluorescent- a through likely is it isolated, are cells satellite bovine how 4 α ,C3,D6 XR,Va1 D2and CD82 Vcam1, CXCR4, CD34,CD56, 7, iue4 Figure nvitro in .Con- ). . Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. kltlmsl.Amliulae ytb a ese omn hc otis1 niiulnce.From nuclei. individual 11 contains which forming seen [23]. ref be al., can et myotube Swartz multinucleated A muscle. skeletal 4: Figure is align dish will myotubes a single in animal, this an re-creating However, In muscle. 22]. finally [21 , and process bundles, growing elicited muscle trivial. fiber vitro be as primary fibers, in must not many muscle the contractions myofibrils, to of therefore form hypertrophy contrast component myotube and and in vital and frequent synthesis a is as protein is This promotes not and contraction are muscle skeletal skeletal on contractions 20]. Additionally, present spontaneous exogenously. & are which where 1 junctions lines, gap Video by cell [Supplementary mediated development be may during which muscle culture ( in contract proteins spontaneously other will and hydrolysis, ATP calcium, iue5 iue5 radw fsroei raiainivle nmsl contraction. muscle in involved organization sarcomeric of breakdown A 5: Figure 5: Figure iue4: Figure a7adMoei ersn uulyecuiecl ouain niPSC-derived in populations cell exclusive mutually represent Myogenin and Pax7 iue5 Figure 5 .Ide,iS-eie ua kltlmyotubes skeletal human iPSC-derived Indeed, ). Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. o ae B otisavreyo rwhfcos omns n eesr opnnsfrcl survival cell for components necessary available and hormones, being factors, before calves growth filtration fetal of by from variety followed derived a cells, suggest, coagulation, contains might blood, blood FBS the name ( and extract, of the embryo collection factors as sterile chick sale. clotting involves is, process serum, for remove [27] The horse to FBS The centrifugation although industry. dairy and (FBS), Clas- the used. cells. serum of to sometimes by-products bovine growth. factors are are which fetal these and types delivering metabolism usually sera to cell is other work-around for choice or easy required an of factors as serum additional serum animal of animal lots used have are researchers there sically, and our complex, furthering is by conditions. Biology All upon culture improved cell be living. of can control keep but and can is Serum well monitoring cells medium fairly robotic the culture future body that cell having the so and The This in balance biology found pH of with. environment worked restores understanding (HCO3-). the being and cells mimics bicarbonate cells, the it of of dead mmHg rate told, form products, metabolic ˜40 and the of waste amount levels in cellular the CO2 on removes buffer depending blood pH hours, mimics 24-72 which a every CO2, replaced as survive, 5% to acts typically common needs predominantly and most cell temperature) the and a ( of (body expect sugar Some Celsius might and degrees you vitamins, used. 37 what salts, actually of is acids, consist what amino formulations down namely medium break basal let’s culture So cell anything. mammalian means here “nutrients” if be of as creation can the describing portion articles this Many of Components lot Medium Culture a Cell so proprietary, likely it’s as process product this final on a cells thousand. details with few the month speculation. a exact of a educated from find within compaction considered starting place not of cells take of could method likely billions could some *I of can process through dozens they entire to likely produced, This up are product, form. of myotubes myotube and final consisting mature promote shape a Once nano- final will into by a which attachment. aided “polished” into of biomaterials be and points additionally or harvested tensile may substrates, provide be and fusion as essential materials, of well be scaffolding process as will The other components maturation serum-free or exist. new is of likely a plastics this use in Classically, methods the patterned apparatus below myotubes. similar and separate into discuss yet a fusion I fusion, alternative to myocyte as suchthus transferred however and proliferation, proteins starvation, be myocytes Wnt the serum will of of cells via phases: production using use the done for the possible, main the produced, promote allow through are as will will three cells possibly that cells that enough commitment, medium in morphogens satellite Once lineage containing occurs dividing not [76]. medium but Wnt7a many process as specialized cells as satellite the a produce the in in tell, of to likely grow self-renewal and can aims to described phase I cells previously proliferation allows scales. as methods This The industrial and far at [25]. [26] space production as cells smaller polishing. for stem case, a suitable mesenchymal in more either of surface cells are of growth In the which numbers for increase bioreactors larger which past in of similar microcarriers use the culturing shape plastic for the in of a enable suspension used to thus use forming been is and utilizing the together form has to By strategy on compacted bind technique to focus one to and together strategies hypertrophy. cells [24], packed harvested recent for and video be be area More contraction, this to can fusion, meat. them muscle in rings ground allows promotes myotube to instance, which that individual For way ring method, gelatin a this a in strategies. around and alternative cells scale used seed at have myotubes researchers skeletal “meat,” form to order In iue7 Figure .I u,i’ o h ot“nmlfinl”poutiaial.I kltlmsl,i helps it muscle, skeletal In imaginable. product friendly” “animal most the not it’s sum, In ). nvitro in etdsrb h rwhpoesa i aho nutrients” of bath a “in as process growth the describe meat iue6 Figure 6 .Teclsaegoni nicbtrwre to warmed incubator an in grown are cells The ). Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. fteesnilfcosfudi eu,sc sisln rnfri,slnu,ptecn,adprogesterone and putrescine, some selenium, only transferrin, contain which insulin, [34] as replacements such serum serum, knockout trick in or The found supplements co- factors of conditions, a essential supplement. skeletal addition serum-free Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium the is human the in 1% for of here via performed and protocol author be be Supplement, published to can own first N-2 seems my progenitors 1% the in muscle F12, where serum-free serum skeletal DMEM use a cells, of specifically I using expansion stem while publication [23], pluripotent Indeed, recent derivation the porcine [33]. muscle or with Meats derivation from continued Memphis the muscle has of on trend of founder completely published This derivation using have cells groups for stem several 32]. terminal myosatellite method or muscle, 31, to pluripotent skeletal [30, cells human For conditions or stem are murine serum-free or pluripotent from made types. differentiate myotubes pluripotent and been cell skeletal can induced have expensive, of other formulations I and expansion Other lot, for embryonic lab, to pipeline all the formulations. the lot nearly In medium in from result, serum-free completely variable a serum-free. in As notoriously lineages performed is neuronal medium is serum-free serum contaminants. culture creating other because cell in really or is time stem hormones mycoplasma long those this a to of for for all lead working Are reason can been The have serum? researchers without out, formulation turns formulations. Meats medium it a Memphis As re-create of to Valeti however be indispensable? Uma it serum, by will difficult utilized supported how 2013 further So is in ( This year produced last burger Twitter [28]. meat on case them first the asked the be I not Meats, when will Mosa serum-free this then of forward pro- alike, Post moving formulations vegans Mark medium and to in vegetarians, According used. 2% imperatives, be to moral to of 10% to need purpose from catering formulations the serum medium while if However, altogether of reduction process myotubes. the the skeletal of and fusion survive the and motes proliferate to cells iue6 iue6 omlto fasadr aa medium. basal standard a of Formulation 6: Figure 6: Figure iue8 Figure n nadsuso ihSmHri [29]. Harris Sam with discussion a in and ) 7 nvitro in eti oeiiaeaiasfrom animals eliminate to is meat Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. si un u,tems omnyue usrt o rmr ucecl rwhi o percentage low a is growth cell muscle primary for relevant? substrate this is used why fact commonly So over-looked most often self- an the doing?” muscle is they skeletal out, which were on types, turns “what others cell substrate ask, and it other ECM will Blau for As the future Helen true of the is from Work same of elasticity The biologists and provides cell in. stiffness which that 40]. stiffness are the [39, and they (ECM), for differentiation elasticity environments matrix importance and sense the renewal extracellular to vital for cells “feel” a the allows [pun-intended] shown as ECM a has the known get Additionally, to jungle order protein [38]. in support dense biochemical a and in structural grow typically Cells Substrates Cellular it extracts formulations that serum-free protein what clear plant-based exactly is say on using cannot it these I in start-ups, indispensable while of underway sum, these contain effects In by are but ill used “hormone-free” efforts 37]. possible being as [36, as other are the advertised peptones Additionally, such or to be serum things as vegetal will as understanding meat known include insulin. clean better as farming likely a such it’s bovine has hormones Thus, who in Melengestrol someone and shamed Trenbolone, health. to Zeranol, typically human divert as hormones I such hormones although The synthetic [35], and hormone growth bovine supplement). recombinant N-2 in (found iue7 iue7 yia opsto fftlbvn eu sdi elculture. cell in used serum bovine fetal of composition Typical 7: Figure 7: Figure is 8 urnl possible. currently Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. .I ean nla om hte ieetcl ye ilb ieetae and differentiated be will types cell to different time whether had me yet to not unclear has contractions remains animal reducing It the can or stimulation because preventing electrical way, tender for of [45]. same is amount of used process the veal and patterning In been this instance, culture For and also mirror in muscles. have and time shape muscle. mature alignment ’ of cells animal strengthened, repeatable of length myotube develop mimic fat of textures the for to of and formation tenderness, scaffolds used For taste ratios the and be the different in mimic cells [44]. for aid that fat purposes is meats may produce intertwined these intention to to shaped bioprinting with be is different the necessary 3D myotubes intention into cells should Rather, the of molded skeletal fat It that be Incorporation of bat. assume to ratios shouldn’t the cells. able meats. one the be off fat clear, find to steak be of to cells To ribeye differentiation order muscle marbled in drive texture. labs perfectly to and other flavor, a acids incorporate taste, at to fatty underway best underway the using are already yield are efforts and efforts similar cells how that discusses stem Post assumed Mark derived plant-based what’s 41:30], the (fat-) two So start in [43, adipose- those progress podcast reviews. – coming-of-age recent rave mistake this with yet no In met slow, issues? been make the these has address And in burger to evident beet-juice done is “bloody” being texture. This Meat’s into Beyond play and would where taste industry, that switch. meat considerations is the meat environmental store making clean and between ethics, consumer the shown, cost, a at publicly of considerations buy been outweigh what’s you likely on features product based packaged this differences, scale the obvious that immediately properly and point most to the the order make of in One to that want possible growing mainly quite for but choice it’s Additionally, primary Alternatively, here, Taste the well. substrate be as cell will [41]. products a Again bioreactors animal muscle as substrate-free [42]. of as hydrogels production, growth free such muscle of be skeletal types use of can hydrogels cell promotion synthetic the area in of certain on well use used of fared speculate the be have through features I if laminin-521 also well elasticity as as wondering can such area and left and proteins this stiffness recombinant (0.45 [23]) in again desired made niche here mouse are been cell mimic section we from already satellite have to discussion derived So efforts human manuscript’s Luckily, is the my which as in substrate. products. Matrigel, stiffness) include differentiation Alternatively, of I a which (measure as kPa, Modulus pigs. Young’s 0.5 from versus similar derived kPa a gelatin, has porcine cells, of sarcoma 0.2%) – (0.1 iue8 iue8 n fmn ulcsaeet yMmhsMasdcaigsrmfe elculture. cell serum-free declaring Meats Memphis by statements public many of One 8: Figure 8: Figure 9 nvitro in eti elydvi fanimal of devoid really is meat nvtomeat. vitro in nvitro in real’ may Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ute piietepouto ieieadfia rdc.Ti sbigdn tNrhCrln State Carolina North at done to being etc, is taste, This expression, protein lines division, be product. cell cell can of final multiple which terms and create line in can pipeline immortalized characteristics researchers production best “off-the-shelf” Moreover, the the an these optimize with of to further companies. ones addition lead Thus, the or elements can researchers select viral line [51]. and among of telomerase ( cell shared addition of myosatellite line and over-expression the cell isolated or banked through SV40 satellite an lines as immortalized to cell such checkpoints an immortalize factors cycle artificially creating cell to be alter ways just that out perhaps figured would have alternative Scientists better even for lines An cell immortalized of use the envisions Org. Harvest New from representative vitro A in 9: Figure 9: Figure that scaling protocol large which differentiation myotubes and skeletal a easy at through product. arrive for guided meat finally allow a to be would into order then in formed iPSCs could discussed, be cells with previously can These those Starting as such deletions, development, population. repro- duplications, mimics increased apoptosis. chromosome starting is although as to initial cell such immortal, lead the errors essentially a of replication can cell When DNA which the and of makes etc, likelihood billions Hayflick This inversions, higher the of earlier. to bypassing tens lead discussed length. thus divisions the expression telomere were cell telomerase of in which endogenous restoration likely activates iPSCs, through it is from Limit state, patty pluripotent starting single a costs. be into lower a grammed would and make way efficiencies to increase alternative needed to One maximum explored cells a be of around to to volume up need inherently the confined ways as are is alternative number, known cells Cells by phenomenon satellite purified cells a of – of expansion? population shortening after a times telomere Thus, sample 40 to biopsy of due 50]. muscle indefinitely [49, single Limit replicate Hayflick a to the capacity from their obtain in you constrained can “meaty” cells true many a How of lack for up plant-based lines make the Immortalized to meaty in able a work re-creating be much to the may Finally, critical improve compounds are [48]. flavor. synthetic to that or explored of efforts heme taste addition being as Additionally, such the also multiple compounds Therefore, are that isolating color combinations. aroma. towards and meat gone distinct meat has the taste unique industry will give create this “meat” animals as body however different to [46, well different from composition combined originates, as of tissue fiber-type be muscle shelf-life it muscle as the skeletal well can that which of as the possible types from patterns taste entirely perspective, expression animal animal) also the developmental gene Intuitively, It’s (or certain a of from part terms 47]. Indeed, biopsy. in body different muscle tested. inherently of original is truly type areas the be what of to on yet location as based has the grown change is be may taste will muscle for they consideration whether last or two, The the start. combining the before from muscle co-culture skeletal a the of independently expanded etdrn edtAMA. Reddit a during meat nvitro in lhuh2-0i rciei oeraitc lhuhti eut nalreamount large a in results this Although realistic. more is practice in 20-30 although 10 iue9 Figure ). Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. o ntne n hstepsiiiyeit nteftr o ehooia auiyt i on where point a hit to maturity technological for cells, immortalized future (via the altogether in non-existent. animals practically exists for becomes However, possibility farming need future. the animal the foreseeable thus exist traditional eliminate the always and for to likely remain instance) will opportunity to for food the likely for offer a seem and animals essentially meats becomes farming societies quality does post ‘westernized’ of high in this concept for starting in The markets dramatically, described world. and shrink technology the will the throughout populations spreading If these countries eventually availability. that populated water inevitable highly is and other it but land, reality, States arable United environment, the the in on only not ( livestock well of as amount staggering a is There livestock? the immortalized to or happens engineered What that public the compa- convincing meat in clean them and eat. etc) FDA for example to the out recombinase, Regardless, safe cut [one Cre work be type) CRISPR-mediated, their set-up. would cell have be inducible, cells would to other (drug system going available (or the are how are myotube to nies exactly skeletal immortalization options can- unsure only cells in am many mature eating the checkpoints, involved I Additionally, this, I’m post-mitotic, cellular although factors For mean a the normal line. this into avoid cell off” immortalized Does transition to “turn here,53]. an to mechanisms smooth creating methods many a in tumors. engineered have methods allow from additionally the cells contain derived to Cancer likely similar are will be lines would cell exactly. which of immortalized not some Well, of lot a cer? know I – Wait broiler the in increase massive a resources. to less led time. using have throughout while techniques rate timeframe feeding growth and and breeding Selective body chicken’s 10: Figure 10: Figure repetitive of elimination complete or of limiting meat the to “off-the-shelf” of lead production will it quick which that the time texture, for sped-up or lines already turkey taste, the cell biopsies. small animal, in immortalized a decrease specific optimized of huge a of creation chicken a stocks the of sized have indicative full to [52], likely a led thawing grow that after to lines weeks takes cell 2 just turkey in immortalized nugget have scientists where University, iue11 Figure .A etoe rvosy anann hs nmlppltostksamsietoll massive a takes populations animal these maintaining previously, mentioned As ). { iue10 Figure .I h uue etpouto opne iltherefore will companies production meat future, the In ). nvitro in 11 ehd a ffree agryed nashorter a in yields larger even offer may methods nvitro in meat Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. otoldadpeitbefsin ndigs,teceto fgntclymdfidognss(GMOs) in organisms organisms modified of genetically makeup of genetic creation the the modify so, to doing In us enable fashion. now predictable biology and and controlled genetics a of optimization understanding and Our nutrition improved for opportunities Engineering . Economist The From country. by populations Livestock 11. Figure 11: Figure 12 Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. ewudamt isorma’ urtoa rfie oorlkn.Iiaieetr opne ntefuture range the and in feasibility the companies for entire biochemistry imagine in I expert an liking. to our divert possible. to I options however profiles By goals, of nutritional these quantities. meat’s on low our specifically in types bias so focused these to do synthesize they aim for naturally but would extensively to ( (ALA), we studied capacity pathways acid the been alpha-linolenic biosynthetic have have of these do which ingestion engineering mammals following fish, acids other in fatty and found omega-3 Humans in typically of EPA, output benefits. nutritional at and health optimize DHA good to as their undertaken pretty such of be pathway acids getting For could biosynthetic fatty are strategies omega-3 complete We Similar inputs. a molecular create [59]. done. specific to yeast vitro be able given in sugar were can outputs from scientists that molecular opioids engineering, things specific enzymatic of produce through variety instance, to a pathways are biological there modifying purposes, nutritional For through or or enhancement animals performance knockout MSTN for from follistatin cells athletes inhibitor satellite Human harvesting of 56]. Thus, the creation [55, 58]. of the including strategies [57, use muscles, farming strategies through larger anti-aging standard even this, abnormally than muscle exploring with lean also animals more are of provide identification they mutations the as occurring commercially, Randomly to modified check. genetically led essentially in [ of have which growth gene muscle creation humans gene over keeps MSTN the myostatin true it the has by be so, hold the that encoded doing may not in protein In meat implemented will a grown . this is be inhibit lab Myostatin certain may to the almost out. functions that aware, knocked am modification am is I myostatin I of But where as type animals modified. far first genetically As The been changes. CRISPR not time. these other has make and shown to CRISPR/Cas9 publicly ability as been such the advances hone technological further engineering systems genetic burdens. recent environmental ever-growing said, and that an economic, With feeding ethical, to least related the problems produces world thing which real good manner tackle a to humans in for population ability unprecedented an offers et h o-agn ri eewudb o h raino etwihhshg ocnrtosof concentrations high has which meat of creation the for be would here fruit low-hanging The meat. iue12 Figure ti nsaal htGO oadwl otnet lyavtlrl nhmnprogress. human in role vital a play to continue will and do GMOs that inescapable is It . nvitro in .Rsacesaenwepoigegneigsrtge omk hs animals these make to strategies engineering exploring now are Researchers 54]. , SNkoku ellnswl ieyla ohge ilso kltlmsl tissue. muscle skeletal of yields higher to lead likely will lines cell knockout MSTN iue1:Fgr 2 ulwtotmyostatin. without bull A 12: Figure 12: Figure iue13 Figure 13 ratrn rdtoa ellrmdu formulations, medium cellular traditional altering or ) hsi a is This in Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. fdvlpeto e ahgncbceilsris diinly hsmasta orma ilb reof free be will meat your that fear means and this resistance Additionally, antibiotic to to (think strains. meat leading pathogens bacterial factory-farmed been current pathogenic from foodborne has to switch new that contrary to a of consumption Thus, development that points antibiotic means antibiotics. of reduce evidence to This of all efforts free with so antibiotics, 63]. and coincide done 62, of process is Indeed, [61, overuse this perform free contamination. biosafety of antibiotic Through personally a outside in practices I of so culture possibility farming do cell the we filtration. factory cells, eliminate the and the largely of for regulation you all medium practices, air virtually the culture replace through to cell bacteria environment need standard keeps we which obtain the other turns When dishes we it controls plastic culture, in. As in cell which getting tissues standard from cabinet and In air [60]. cells the animals sterile. culturing in bad, into is of spores are process goes use or things going the the States those they if through United and antibiotics environment are the antibiotics any near-sterile How in need of a sterility. antibiotics really tons and don’t all require you process must of however, the that 70% out, – approximately is contaminated Indeed, consumer not would-be is a right? meat for the mind that to ensure comes to that question big A cGMP and Sterility, Antibiotics, naturally of future in Modifications acids fatty these of acids. levels fatty higher to beneficial synthesis of acid fatty synthesis bias biochemical to able The vitro be may 13: enzymes Figure occurring 13: Figure meats. Salmonella or Listeria ,wihwudlk eraeteicdneo foodborne of incidence the decrease like would which ), 14 nvitro in nvitro in etbigcompletely being meat etwl nicely will meat in Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. oti a 06 h asta hypa oue2,0 ie iratr htwudb bet produce amount to average able an be eat who would people that Mark 10,000 bioreactors with than liter interviews more 25,000 for from use enough comes although is to this process, which plan on scaling year, be they find the per should that into could meat It says going I of currently who pounds data itself. is 882,000 2016, best product industry May The the this in uncertain. of in Post creation currently work cost successful are the of the specifics mentioned, amount in previously the involved large As those a as cost. that important the assumed is as reality just into are this scaling making first to the barriers current of largest the humans of yet? other One list by a consumed investments on been I and has Am scale, commercial meat any human Cost, by that exists. entertained possibility and be the space-farers possible won’t future So is Maybe idea it past. this that the vegan. Obviously, stating in uber worth the fashion. of it’s semi-sustainable fantasy but a completely closed-loop entity, of in be of sort would meat some process it grow in same course, . will . the Of oneself. through eat meat. taken even human be could growing one to of cells possibility human the for is possible up comes 65 ]. that [64, question here Another cGMP of details the likely on It’s for sense seriously. specifically better for very framework a adapted taken new get compliant be know, a can cGMP could I You that products Being as likely created. therapy far also cellular be batch-to-batch. as it’s of identical however and production and production, resources the safe meat for and requirements is time for cGMP of product many essential investment that a are high ensure very agencies to a regulatory as requires standard you, requirements highest tell these the will to to make people refer eventually and We some will specific what requirements. has or that despite FDA these products the And [cellular] out Rather, or carrying humans. cabinet. chemicals biosafety into produce standard way that some their facilities in produced for be requirements just stringent won’t meat the But deaths. or illnesses Cannibalism cGMP ne GPrgltos h aiiis qimn,mtras n ult suac r held are assurance quality and materials, equipment, facilities, the regulations, cGMP Under . iue1:Fgr 4 ceai fasadr isft aie sdi elculture. cell in used cabinet biosafety standard a of schematic A 14: Figure 14: Figure nvitro in abre a roughly was hamburger $ 2,0i 03 hs raino ehooista enable that technologies of creation Thus, 2013. in 325,00 15 nvitro in urn odMnfcuigPractice Manufacturing Good current etpouto.I’ osbethat possible It’s production. meat nvitro in etwudne to need would meat nvitro in Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. fgntclymdfidfo rdcsdenthl ihr aypol led aetermnsmd up made minds their perception have public’s already the people of with Many is amount battle topic either. wild long The help this the doesn’t on to A. products article due exhibit food an as was modified serving whenever post genetically cabinet Facebook Trump’s blog of and President this with Reddit grow making on to for sections motivations comment ( main in discussed the read of I One misinformation confused. to some aim reception who engineers public and The scientists of amount a that larger positive a Reception be in to usher continue will results problems. this proof-of-principle scaling and as these arrive that solve will likely to funding is of it influx Nevertheless, at the real by aimed led [75]. be rounds the projects may funding off meat capital large Good agriculture scientists attracted venture the cellular have or new in called Meat a companies companies others, Beyond group new to as and A get such Foundation support to companies Gates [73]. other aim plant-based pages organizations While and current these opportunity of educational, Together, grant landscape ground. legal, [74]. the or providing space view portfolio in the to their within aids way visiting similarly good general in by a Institute involved seen Indeed, projects Food of be eggs. types all and can for milk projects advocates goals. lab-made and these funds including that accomplish industry. agriculture institute to cellular research food emerge 501c3 or a to industrial the agriculture is starting engineering, Harvest cellular disrupting tissue New just in biology, is cell from programs assistance (stem new come fields Indeed, through related academia would etc). in scientists in engineering, that for achieved opportunities be in earnings job involved can advertising potential seriously field by people are this the 100 in that around interest considering industry likely Increasing are and insane There academia involved. is of people inside which few world so entire with performed the was in support reduction cost to the parity. the efforts about that price rather other part faster achieving or impressive play in Subsidizing most must way The power long production. a political energy go of renewable can wielding accelerate technology where Thus, of will meat the industry tax adoption sense, fuel concerns. the this carbon fossil ignored. external In accelerating a the often over of in are chosen burdens. that public role are health parallels the a public companies environment to other the for on American and on gains which passed by agriculture costs from quick then meats animal up healthcare cheap are of propped in of which impact supply is increases environment detrimental a downstream industry the having to agriculture of on leads benefits the costs the This relief, external with drought okay the be and From choose, may feed to public [72]. to the subsidies while government on, And of graze amounts taxpayers. to large which receives based) on impacts. animal land environmental and and plant costs (both on agriculture Today, of recent save production to a Thus, directly In [71]. distributors includes the product. processes dish with that own of end up a chain their goal an innovate supply in to the than complex meat rather costs how a infrastructure growing additional discusses has Valeti between adds industry which Uma come agriculture etc, podcast, The that shipping, costs mouth. a packaging, consumer’s to hidden slaughtering, a closer farming, additional into getting are it already there getting we however, and Thus, scaling, consumers. with beef. to Even ground attractive pound standard be a would than of that pound ratio price point per to the the price expensive dropped however beef, had more [67], of price 9-10x of 3:1 the roughly production production to that the the 23:1 suggested for for 2017 from February that bioreactor reduced a at stated been build already reported already to recently has has was out Meats chicken calories Memphis of to of in Valeti calories Uma of [66]. beef of $ 5 ilo olrvnuecptlfn rmTsnFosmyhl iksatsm fteealternative these of some start kick help may Foods Tyson from fund capital venture dollar million 150 iue15 Figure .I’ ersig tscerta ituto cec nAeiairtoal proceeds irrationally America in science of distrust that clear It’s depressing. It’s ). nvitro in etsest emxd ihsm eyectd oedsutd and disgusted, some excited, very some with mixed, be to seems meat $ $ .Teei uddpoeta etSaeUniversity State Kent at project funded a is There [68]. 9,000/lb 13 ugri o h rmtccs euto nol er,but years, 3 only in reduction cost dramatic the not is burger 11.36 nvitro in nvitro in etcnupini h aewyta ayeprsfeel experts many that way same the in consumption meat nvitro in .Admr eety eotin report a recently, more And [69]. lobster and pork 16 $ ,mkn h cost the making [70], burger ounce five a for 11.36 etidsr st iakadctotexisting cut-out and hijack to is industry meat nvitro in etpoet.Frinstance, For projects. meat nvitro in nvitro in etam oteam to aims meat etproduction, meat nvitro in Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. no aigma.Idnttiktemjrt ftewrdcudcmi oavgtra rvgnlifestyle vegan or vegetarian a meat. to of form commit different could slightly world to the practices. adjust of current to and majority able from process the be different the think may radically see don’t they to is I but which people allow meat. personal, will future eating and This enjoy for close today. possible up are be getting microbreweries will Additionally, they’re as It fashion that same transparency. product added the is the the in with factor” visited comes “gross and be the meat to of ‘real’ fears as texture reducing advantage and or One taste, discussed. looks, previously in indistinguishable benefits nearly is that product past. the field. in overcome a confirmation in to own experts hard their becoming be validate to to to lives proven their opinions naturehas dedicated unprofessional to have out appeal who to seek those urge of they opinions The as the foods disregarding while modified biases of form any on nteed oee,Ibleeta h rets ftepbi ilb o hs opne optota out put to companies these for be will public the of test true the that believe I however, end, the In iue1:Fgr 5 ortpclcmet ne eetWl tetJunlpost. Journal Street Wall recent a under comments typical Your 15. Figure 15: Figure nvitro in etpoie elsi praht aigtefc hthmn r mioe and omnivores are humans that fact the facing to approach realistic a provides meat nvitro in 17 etde aei ovnigtepbi fissafety its of public the convincing in have does meat nvitro in etfacilities meat Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 2]seclsmapaepesogcnetery21/7.../sctm.2015-0340.full.pdf+html . . stemcellstm.alphamedpress.org/content/early/2016/07/. [23] [22] [21] www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26688333 [20] [19] [18] [17] [16] [15] [14] [13] [12] [11] [10] pdf [9] [8] [7] www.supermeat.com [6] [5] [4] burger-to-be-tasted [3] [2] [1] post. this in References mentioned companies any any contain with not associated do I meals am my of nor the 90% from outlined Roughly funding receive I’ve reasons. not environmental Hopefully do to I due largely meat. years. average ˜5 than meat in less market the the technology. from hit familiar aside Disclosure: in to soon-to-be growth options this expected rapid few of are tissue foresee implications be products I and face and to decade, first feasibility the techniques, seems next the In culture the there as Over agriculture. cell concerns, agriculture technologies. animal biology, ethical new traditional cell and of disrupt environmental, muscle pursuit to growth, of opportunity population understanding unprecedented of an our offer in now advances engineering recent sum, In Conclusions http://2014falleng114.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/88945115/cultured_meat_lca_es_t_published. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-04/world-s-first-332-000-lab-grown-beef- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_meat_production https://www.shojinmeat.com/home http://www.memphismeats.com/ http://stemcellpodcast.com/tag/dr-mark-post https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Viking https://www.amazon.com/Thoughts-Adventures-Churchill-Reflects-Cartoons/dp/1935191462 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_hypertrophy http://stemcellpodcast.com/tag/dr-mark-post http://www.cell.com/cell-stem-cell/fulltext/S1934-5909(16)30253-3 https://skeletalmusclejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13395-016-0106-6 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4618654/ http://www.nature.com/nprot/journal/v10/n10/full/nprot.2015.110.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22130830 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_potency https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ag-gag http://tim.blog/2016/12/13/ezra-klein/ https://soundcloud.com/samharrisorg/the-dark-side http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2373e/i2373e00.htm tswrhmninn htIa o eeaino ea,atog ocncosyconsume consciously do I although vegan, or vegetarian a not am I that mentioning worth It’s 18 nvitro in et n alternative and meats Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. [57] [56] [55] http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa040933#t=article [54] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC39972/ [53] [52] [51] [50] [49] [48] [47] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvdy.20697/full [46] [45] [44] [43] [42] [41] [40] [39] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extracellular [38] [37] [36] [35] [34] [33] [32] http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v33/n9/full/nbt.3297.html [31] [30] [29] [28] [27] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18348332 [26] [25] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LKsSEbSrUQ [24] http://bitesizebio.com/24304/how-to-become-immortal-generation-of-immortal-cell-lines/ http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2008/03/gene-therapy-delivered-protein.html http://www.nature.com/articles/srep16623 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549068/ http://www.gfi.org/clean-meats-path-to-commercialization http://www.nature.com/news/medical-research-cell-division-1.13273 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hayflick_limit http://www.takepart.com/feature/2016/05/23/cultured-beef https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3684422/ http://a16z.com/2016/11/23/meatless-meats-clean-meats/ http://www.nature.com/articles/srep28855 http://stemcellpodcast.com/tag/dr-mark-post https://skeletalmusclejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13395-016-0116-4 http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v20/n3/abs/nm.3464.html http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/term.289/abstract https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2929271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4170488/ http://www.altex.ch/resources/Altex_1_10_Brunner.PDF http://www.sustainabletable.org/258/hormones https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/10828028 http://www.nature.com/articles/srep41833 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4022691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266001/ https://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/meat-without-murder http://www.takepart.com/feature/2016/05/23/cultured-beef https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_bovine_serum http://www.new-harvest.org/mark_post_cultured_beef matrix 19 Posted on Authorea 10 Dec 2017 — CC BY 4.0 — https://doi.org/10.22541/au.151294163.34502176 — This a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. [76] future-of-food http://www.tysonfoods.com/media/news-releases/2016/12/tyson-foods-creates-venture-fund-to-fuel-the- [75] [74] [73] [72] [71] in-2020 [70] [69] in-lab-1489570202?tesla=y&mod=e2fb [68] [67] [66] [65] [64] story.html?utm_term=.123efb6b6d56 and-it-may-be-healthier-than-the-real-stuff/2016/05/02/aa893f34-e630-11e5-a6f3-21ccdbc5f74e_ [63] [62] [61] antibiotics-in-animal-feed/2012/04/12/gIQAOEfZCT_blog.html?utm_term=.6d4b56fd7294 [60] [59] [58] http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/answering-how-a-sausage-gets-made-will-be-more-complicated- https://www.wsj.com/articles/startup-to-serve-up-chicken-strips-cultivated-from-cells- https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/lab-grown-meat-is-in-your-future- https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/wonkbook-why-you-should-care-about- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19497282 http://www.gfi.org/what http://www.new-harvest.org/portfolio https://www.wsj.com/articles/should-washington-end-agriculture-subsidies-1436757020 http://a16z.com/2016/11/23/meatless-meats-clean-meats/ http://www.new-harvest.org/cultured_meat_at_kent_state_university http://fortune.com/2016/02/02/lab-grown-memphis-meats/ http://www.takepart.com/feature/2016/05/23/cultured-beef https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3666518/ https://www.fda.gov/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/manufacturing/ucm169105.htm https://www.uncommonwisdomdaily.com/will-your-next-burger-be-grown-in-a-lab-22292 http://www.gfi.org/memphis-meats-cultured-meat-company-profiled https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4924617/ https://www.technologyreview.com/s/542371/a-tale-of-do-it-yourself-gene-therapy/ 20