Social Safeguard Due Diligence Review

November 2019

Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Greater Mekong Subregion East-West Economic Corridor Agriculture Infrastructure Sector Project

Prepared by the Department of Irrigation, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Asian Development Bank.

This social safeguard due diligence review is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Irrigation

LAO: GMS East-West Economic Corridor Agriculture Infrastructure

Sector Project ADB - Loan No. 3024-Lao (SF)

Social Safeguard Due Diligence Review: Phase 1 Subprojects

Prepared by the international social safeguard consultant for the National Project Management Office, Department of Irrigation, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for the Government of Lao PDR and the Asian Development Bank. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the NPMO.

Vientiane, November 2019

ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP/AH - affected person/affected household DAFO - Department of Agriculture and Forestry Office DCO - District Coordination Office DED - detailed engineering design DMS - detailed measurement survey DOI - Department of Irrigation EA - executing agency EWEC-AISP - GMS East-west Economic Corridor Agriculture Infrastructure Sector Project PAFO - Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office GMS - Greater Mekong Subregion GoL - Government of Lao PDR IA - implementing agency LACP - land acquisition and compensation plan LACR - land acquisition and compensation report LAK - Lao Kip LAR - land acquisition and resettlement LIC - loan implementation consultants MAF - Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry NPMO - National Project Management Office PAFO - Provincial Agriculture and Forestry Office PIB - project information brochure PPMO - Provincial Project Management Office ROW - right of way RP - resettlement plan WUG - water users’ group

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES ha - hectare km - kilometer lm - linear meter m - meter m2 - square meter

CONTENTS I. Introduction ...... 3 II. Description of the Subprojects ...... 4 III. Land Acquisition per the LACRs ...... 5 A. Bungxe Subproject ...... 5 B. Phanomxay Subproject ...... 6 C. Vapy Neau Subproject ...... 6 IV. Site Visits ...... 7 A. Bungxe Subproject ...... 7 B. Phanomxay Subproject ...... 8 C. Vapy Neau Subproject ...... 9 V. Analysis and Discussion ...... 10 VI. Lesson Learned and Follow-up Actions Required ...... 12 VII. Conclusion ...... 12 Appendix 1 Voluntary Donation Forms ...... 13 Appendix 2 Master List of Bungxe Subproject AHs ...... 42 Appendix 3 Land Losses of Bungxe Subproject AHs ...... 43 Appendix 4 Master List of Phanomxay Subproject AHs ...... 44 Appendix 5 Land Losses of Phanomxay Subproject AHs ...... 46 Appendix 6 Master List of Vapy Neau Subproject AHs ...... 51 Appendix 7 Land Losses of Vapy Neau AHs ...... 53 Appendix 8 DDR Mission Meeting in Bungxe Village, 23 September 2019 ...... 57 Appendix 9 DDR Mission Meeting in Phanomxay Village, 23 September 2019 ...... 60 Appendix 10 DDR Mission Meeting in Vapy Neau Village, 25 September 2019 ...... 64

LIST OF TABLES Table I-1 Subprojects of EWEC-AISP ...... 3 Table III-1 Basic Information on Bungxe AH Heads ...... 5 Table III-2 Basic Information on Phanomxay AH Heads ...... 6 Table III-3 Basic Information on Vapy Neau AH Heads ...... 7

LIST OF FIGURES Figure I-1: Project Location Map ...... 4

I. Introduction

1. The Government of Lao People’s Democratic Republic (GoL) is implementing the GMS East-west Economic Corridor Agriculture Infrastructure Sector Project (EWEC-AISP) in the provinces of Savannakhet and Salavan. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is supporting the project through Loan 3024-Lao (SF).1 The EWEC-AISP aims to regenerate and upgrade existing but underdeveloped and outdated agriculture infrastructure facilities that include pumping stations, weirs, canals, control structures, farm access roads and bridges. The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) is the executing agency (EA), assisted by the Department of Irrigation (DOI) that put up a National Project Management Office (NPMO) in Vientiane. The provincial governments of Savannakhet and Salavan are the implementing agencies (IAs), each assisted by a Provincial Project Management Office (PPMO). The District Coordination Office (DCO) at the District Agriculture and Forestry Office (DAFO) of each participating district provides support to the PPMO. The EWEC-AISP is being implemented in 3 phases, with 3 subprojects in Phase 1 (commenced in 2016) and 12 subprojects in Phase 2 (with 6 subprojects commencing in 2017-2018). Phase 3 has not yet started and 10 subprojects are being considered for inclusion.

2. This due diligence review (DDR) report covers the 3 subprojects in Phase 1 that were completed in 2017. The report will (1) look into the scope of project impacts, (2) check on how land acquisition was planned and executed, and (3) suggest actions that need to be undertaken to correct any outstanding social issues. It is hoped that lessons could be drawn from the findings of this report that would help project authorities improve resettlement planning and implementation in subsequent subprojects of the AISP. Table I-1 Subprojects of EWEC-AISP Phase Subproject Province District Phase Sub-project Province 1 Bungxe Savannakhet Xaybouli 3* Phouheau-sao-va Savannakhet Phanomxay Savannakhet Phalanxay Dan Savanh Savannakhet Vapy Neua Salavan Vapi Had-kham Dee Savannakhet 2 Group 1 Bungtalae Savannakhet Nathuen Salavan Khongxedon Nakang-xe Savannakhet Keng Houat Salavan Khongxedon Heuane-hine Savannakhet Gnotbak Savannakhet Champhon Sout-ta-vali Salavan Dong Boun Savannakhet Xonbouri Houay lath Salavan Dong Savang Thong Savannakhet Songkhon Vapy tai Salavan Houay Thouat Savannakhet Champhon Chalan Xe Salavan Group 2* Kan Tha Chane* Savannakhet Xaiphouthong Phak kha * Savannakhet Kaysone Prom Na tur * Savannakhet Virabouri Houay Sa Khouang* Savannakhet Phin Na Khoi Sao* Salavan Salvan Dong Mon* Salavan Vapi NOTE: * Has not yet commenced.

1 Loan 3024 was signed on 11 October 2013 and became effective on 7 November 2013. Project closing date is on 31 December 2019 while loan closing date is on 30 June 2022. 3

II. Description of the Subprojects

3. The Bungxe Subproject, located in Xayabouli District of Savannakhet Province, involved the rehabilitation and improvement of the Bungxe pump irrigation system and farm access roads. Rehabilitated or constructed under the subproject were 1 pump station; 2 main irrigation canals (3,703 m long); 7 secondary irrigation canals (8,033 m); 11 tertiary irrigation canals (5,857 m); 4 main drains (5,776 m); 227 ancillary structures (including farm turnouts, divisions, road crossings, culverts, flumes, side spillways, and end structures); and 3 farm roads (5,060 m). The subproject was envisaged to increase the area of dry weather irrigated farms to about 230 ha.

4. The Phanomxay Subproject, located in Phalanxay District of Savannakhet Province, involved the rehabilitation and improvement of the Phanomxay pump irrigation system and farm access roads. Rehabilitated or constructed under the subproject were 1 pump station; 2 main irrigation canals (2,720 m long); 6 secondary irrigation canals (4,260 m); 3 tertiary irrigation canals (645 m); 1 main drain (3,000 m); 85 ancillary structures (including farm turnouts, divisions, road crossings, culverts, flumes, side spillways, and end structures); and 3 farm roads (3,050 m). The subproject was envisaged to increase the area of dry weather irrigated farms to 270 ha. Figure I-1: Project Location Map

Bungxe Phanomxay

Vapy Neua

5. The Vapy Neua Subproject, located in Vapy District of Salavan Province, involved the rehabilitation and improvement of the Vapy Neua pump irrigation system and farm access roads. Rehabilitated or constructed under the subproject were 1 pump station; 1 main irrigation canal

(2,550 m); 8 secondary irrigation canals (6,675 m); 2 tertiary irrigation canals (1,225 m); 2 main drains (2,600 m); 114 ancillary structures (including farm turnouts, divisions, road crossings, culverts, flumes, side spillways, and end structures); and 1 farm road (3,260 m). The subproject was envisaged to increase the area of dry weather irrigated farms to 270 ha.

III. Land Acquisition per the LACRs

6. The Department of Irrigation (DOI) in March 2016 submitted to ADB for concurrence a land acquisition and compensation report (LACR) each for subprojects Bungxe, Phanomxay, and Vapy Neau. Just like a standard resettlement plan (RP), the LACR provided a thorough description of the subproject and included information on (1) the types and quantities of affected assets based on the results of the detailed measurement survey (DMS), (2) the socioeconomic situation of the community and of the affected households (AHs), (3) project principles and entitlements, (4) public consultations held, (5) the grievance redress process, and (6) the budget for implementing land acquisition and resettlement (LAR). A statement at the conclusion of each LACR declares, however, that not a single LAK was needed on compensation for lost assets; the AHs had signed voluntary donation forms in lieu of remuneration for their losses even before the LACRs were written. (See Appendix 1 for sample voluntary donation forms and supporting documents signed by the AHs).

7. In fact, voluntary donation forms were signed by the AHs either before or around the time of the conduct of the DMS. The AHs at the Bungxe Subproject signed voluntary donation forms in July and August 2015 (see para 97 of the Bungxe LACR); the DMS for the subproject was carried out on 21 July to 2 August 2015 (para of the LACR). In Phanomxay Subproject, AHs signed voluntary donation forms in July and August 2015 (para 97 of the Phanomxay LACR) ahead of the 23 September to 6 October 2015 DMS (para 34 of the LACR) for the subproject. In Vapy Neau Subproject, the AHs signed voluntary donation in June and July 2015; the DMS was carried out on 21-30 June 2015 (see para 34 of Vapy Neau LACR).

A. Bungxe Subproject

8. The DMS conducted on 21 July to 2 August 2015 identified the following adverse social impacts of the Bungxe Subproject: (a) acquisition of 0.9251 ha of private productive landholdings of 14 AHs, including forestland, paddy fields and orchards (garden land); (b) acquisition of 0.1860 ha of village forestland; and (c) acquisition of 68 private trees belonging to 11 AHs, in addition to 10 village trees. The total compensation due to the AHs for their lost assets was calculated at 78,546,000 LAK. The AHs executed a deed of voluntary donation in place of cash compensation for their lost assets in July and August 2015.

9. There were 6 vulnerable AHs, 4 women headed and 2 headed by the elderly. None of the AHs was poor. There were a total of 14 AHs, made up of 97 household members or the equivalent of an average household size of 6.9. (See Appendix 2 and Appendix 3 for the master list of the AHs and for details of their land losses). Table III-1 Basic Information on Bungxe AH Heads Female AH Male AH Village Married Widow/er Total Head Head 5

Bungxe 5 2 2 5 7 Hansaysong 5 2 2 5 7 Total 10 4 4 10 14

B. Phanomxay Subproject

10. The DMS on 23 September to 6 October 2015 identified the following assets that the Phanomxay Subproject would acquire: (a) 5.358 ha of private productive landholdings belonging to 74 AHs, including paddy fields and fishponds; (b) 0.1284 ha of drainage land of the village; (c) 0.05 ha of residential land of 20 AHs; (d) secondary structures, such as wooden fences, animal pen, and wooden kitchens; and, (e) 142 private trees belonging to 34 AHs. The total compensation due to the AHs for their lost assets was calculated at 813,100,100 LAK. The AHs in July and August 2015 executed a deed of voluntary donation in place of cash compensation for their affected landholdings, fences, animal pen, and trees. Similarly, the AH with an affected rice bin (12 m2 floor area) and 2 AHs that each lost a kitchen (8.8 m2 and 8.5 m2, respectively) agreed with the DCO and PPMO that the subproject would, at no cost to the affected households, dismantle and rebuild their structures on the same plots of the AHs but outside the subproject right-of-way (ROW).

11. There were 22 women AH heads, 2 of whom were elderly. Also, 19 of the male AH heads were elderly. There were a total of 93 AHs, made up of 639 household members or the equivalent of an average household size of 6.9. (See Appendix 4 and Appendix 5 for the master list of the AHs and for details of their land losses). Table III-2 Basic Information on Phanomxay AH Heads Female AH Male AH Total Village Married Widow/er Head Head (absolute) Phanomxay 33 13 13 33 46 Phalan 5 1 1 5 6 Phoxay 5 1 1 5 6 Phalan Neau 23 6 6 23 29 Phontan 0 1 1 0 1 Phalan Tai 4 0 0 4 4 Nalao 1 0 0 1 1 Total 71 22 22 71 93

C. Vapy Neau Subproject

12. The DMS conducted on 21-30 June 2015 identified the following assets that the Vapy Neau Subproject would acquire: (a) 6.17 ha of private productive landholdings of 102 AHs, including paddy fields and fishponds; (b) 0.2324 ha of communal land of Vapy Village; (c) 0.0601 ha of residential land of 4 AHs; (d) secondary structures, such as wooden fences, farm huts, farm implement shelter, and a rice bin; and, (e) 206 trees belonging to 43 AHs. The total compensation due to the AHs for their lost assets was estimated at 983,552,991 LAK. The AHs in June-July 2015 executed a deed of voluntary donation in place of cash compensation for their affected

landholdings, fences, animal pen, and trees. AHs with affected secondary structures, such as fences and farm huts, were promised that the subproject would have the structures relocated outside the subproject ROW at no cost to them.

13. There were 13 women AH heads, 5 of whom were elderly. Also, 16 of the male AH heads were elderly, 2 of who had physical disabilities. There were a total of 93 AHs, made up of 633 household members or the equivalent of an average household size of 6. (See Appendix 6 and Appendix 7 for the master list of the AHs and for details of their land losses). Table III-3 Basic Information on Vapy Neau AH Heads Female AH Male AH Total Village Married Widow/er Head Head (absolute) Vapy 60 10 9 61 70 Khonesay 25 2 2 25 27 Houykhon 1 0 0 1 1 Donement 1 0 0 1 1 Nasad 1 0 0 1 1 Donekha 3 2 2 3 5 Total 91 14 13 92 105

IV. Site Visits

14. The DDR mission in September 2019 visited the 3 subprojects and met with officers of the villages and water users’ groups (WUGs). A handful of AHs were present in the meetings. Personnel from the PPMO and DCO accompanied the DDR mission.

A. Bungxe Subproject

15. Highlights of the 23 September 2019 visit of the DDR mission in Bungxe Subproject are provided below. a. Construction works in the subproject started in April 2016 and were completed 18 months later in October 2017. b. The WUG and AHs complained that, while the rehabilitated system was generally doing well, there were issues that project authorities had to address, such as (i) water overflows at 4 locations of the main canal; (ii) some canal crossings are so steep that mechanized farm implements could not cross over them; (iii) erosion at the river bank is evident at the site of the systems’ head works; and, (iv) canal water gates and those of farm ditches have expanded and are difficult to operate because they are made of wooden planks.

c. The WUG and AHs complained that the contractor of the head works has yet to completely pay the salaries of laborers hired from the village, notwithstanding that the contractor has already demobilized. d. Participants in the DDR mission’s meeting (see Appendix 8 for the registry of participants and some photos) confirmed that public consultations were held prior and after the DMS. They also confirmed that nobody objected to donating their affected assets in lieu of compensation. However, they recalled that the discussions in the public meetings focused more on the subject of donation; meaning, the entire project policy might not have been discussed with them. The participants could not also agree on whether or not copies of the project information brochure (PIB) were given to the village officials, let alone individual AHs. e. Personnel from the NPMO, PPMO, and DCO carried out the DMS. Officials from the village and WUG were also present during the DMS. Occasionally, members of the AHs were present during the survey. f. Complaints were not recorded, but any complaint that cropped up was reportedly resolved at the village level. g. The land records of the AHs have not yet been amended. The AHs continue to pay tax for the portion of their landholdings that the subproject has already acquired.

B. Phanomxay Subproject

16. Highlights of the 23 September 2019 visit of the DDR mission in Phanomxay Subproject are provided below (see Appendix 9 for the registry of participants and some photos). a. Construction works in the subproject were completed 2 years ago; works lasted for 18 months. There were 2 civil works contractors, one did the headwork, the other the irrigation canals and the village road. b. Construction of the canals and headwork resulted in land take, while construction of the village road resulted in the acquisition of trees and secondary structures. The AHs agreed to donate their losses in lieu of compensation because they wanted the irrigation system improved and they wanted an all-weather village road.

c. However, the scheme has not yet been formally handed over to the village WUG because of outstanding issues, such as: (i) connection to the national power grid is still temporary; (ii) secondary canals and tertiary canals are leaking, causing flooding of paddies and erosion of service roads; and, (iii) work sites of contractors have not yet been restored to pre-project condition. d. Villagers prefer trapezoidal canals than the box-type canals that were constructed by the subproject even if this would have resulted in more land acquisition. e. Villagers prefer the water pump to be on a barge rather than being anchored permanently at the riverbank. f. Contractor of the headwork owes villagers 24.6 million LAK in unpaid workers’ salaries and construction materials. g. Both contractors still have claims with the AISP. h. Personnel from the NPMO, PPMO, and DCO did the DMS without the participation of the AHs. i. The AHs were not provided a copy of their signed voluntary donation forms and the results of the DMS of their affected assets. j. Copies of the PIB were provided to village officials and to the WUG, but not to the AHs. However, participants in the DDR mission meeting remember project authorities discussing the project resettlement policy in public consultations. k. Complaints were not recorded, but any complaint that cropped up was reportedly resolved at the village level. l. The land records of the AHs have not yet been amended. The AHs continue to pay tax for the portion of their landholdings that the subproject has already acquired.

C. Vapy Neau Subproject

17. Highlights of the 25 September 2019 visit of the DDR mission in Vapy Neau Subproject are provided below (see Appendix 10 for the registry of participants and some photos).

a. Construction works in the subproject were completed 2 years ago; works lasted for 18 months beginning in June 2016. Only 1 contractor was engaged for the subproject. b. The irrigation system had been in use the past 2 dry seasons before the September 2019 flood. c. The rehabilitated system was extensively damaged when the Xedon River overflowed its banks on 2-4 September 2019. The irrigation pump on a barge was almost swept away by strong currents and the power transformer was submerged in the flood. An inverted siphon of the main canal that crosses the national highway was destroyed. More than a thousand ha of rice paddies were heavily damaged, and tons of standing rice crops destroyed. Almost 200 water wells were impacted making household water scarce in the village. d. Immediate repairs need to be carried for the residents to be able to plant this coming dry season. e. The WUG and AH complained that the contractor owes villagers more than 100 million LAK in unpaid salaries and construction materials. This was the same contractor engaged in the 2 other subprojects.

f. Personnel from the NPMO, PPMO, and DCO did the DMS without the participation of the AHs. g. AHs signed voluntary donation forms in lieu of compensation; however, the AHs were not provided copies of the signed voluntary donation forms and the DMS of their affected assets. h. Public consultations were held and the project resettlement policy discussed. However, copies of the PIB were not provided to each AH. i. No translated copy of the LACR was posted at the village office. j. Complaints were not recorded, but any complaint that cropped up was reportedly resolved at the village level. k. The land records of the AHs have not yet been amended. The AHs continue to pay tax for the portion of their landholdings that the subproject has already acquired.

V. Analysis and Discussion

18. The LACRs were not resettlement planning documents. Land acquisition was carried out either before or around the time of the conduct of the DMS. Resettlement specialists of the loan implementation consultants (LIC) that prepared the land acquisition and compensation reports seemed to be unaware of this fact. A statement in the Bungxe LACR (see para 98) makes this evident, thus “the final updated LACR concerns the resettlement planning report that had already been concurred by ADB as part of the feasibility study during the PPTA stage.” The feasibility study (FS) stage document referred to was the 2013 resettlement plan prepared for each subproject that also had the title Land Acquisition and Compensation Report, contrary to the norm.

19. Notwithstanding the wrong choice of title, the 2013 LACRs were resettlement plans (RPs). Each LACR included (1) a preliminary identification and assessment of project impacts based on the concept (preliminary) engineering design, (2) socioeconomic information on the AHs, (3) a discussion of project principles and entitlements, (4) a narrative on consultations held, (5) a description of the grievance redress process, (6) an indicative budget for implementing land acquisition and resettlement, (7) a discussion of institutional arrangements in resettlement planning and implementation, and (8) a discussion of monitoring and evaluation requirements.

20. The 2016 LACRs did provide an updated information on project impacts based on the DMS per the approved detailed engineering design, including (1) socioeconomic information of the AHs; (2) a short description of consultations held at the villages to discuss the DMS process and, subsequently, to present the results of the impacts survey; (3) a copy of sections of the 2013 LARCs, such as project principles and entitlements, the grievance redress process, institutional arrangements, and monitoring; and (4) the replacement costs of affected assets. However, the 2016 LARCs reported that even at the time of the DMS, the AHs indicated their willingness to donate their affected assets in lieu of compensation, echoing the same statement in the 2013 feasibility study stage LARCs, thus “the contacted land owners indicated their willingness to donate land to the subproject as they expect benefits from its implementation.” Therefore, the 2016 LARCs reported a zero budget requirement to implement land acquisition because AHs had relinquished their affected assets in favor of the project even before the LARCs could be written.

standard”.

21. On a related social safeguard matter, this DDR report notes that none of the AHs received cash assistance for vulnerability. There is no problem with this per se, since the LACRs declared that all AHs in the 3 subprojects were middle-income households (i.e., none was poor or rich). However, to help readers understand why no cash allowance was to any vulnerable AH, the LACRs should have added a short explanation that the project resettlement framework (RF) only requires the granting of a cash assistance of 50,000 LAK for 90 days to poor AHs that are concurrently headed by the elderly, women, disabled, and a member of an ethnic minority group.

22. The foregoing discussions reveal weaknesses regarding the manner by which land acquisition was planned and implemented in the 3 subprojects.

23. Relatedly, the 2016 updated LACRs could not be considered as resettlement planning documents. The 2016 LACRs contained updates on project impacts per the DMS in addition to the actual implementation of land acquisition. In other words, the 2016 LACRs were more of land acquisition completion reports than resettlement planning documents.

24. This DDR report does not disagree with AHs donating their affected assets to the project in lieu of compensation. This is allowed by the project RF. However, it is difficult to imagine that AHs could make an informed decision on voluntary donation during or shortly after the DMS, let alone in the presence of provincial, district, and village officials. The AHs should have been provided sufficient time to mull over their options on compensation, following confirmation of what they were losing to the project.

25. The following are additional findings of the DDR that illustrate weaknesses in resettlement implementation: a. Land records of AHs have not yet been amended and that AHs continue to pay tax the past years for portions of their landholdings that they already donated to the subprojects is not fair. b. None of the AHs was provided a copy of the DMS of its affected assets and the signed voluntary donation form. This is a weakness in transparency and documentation. c. None of the AHs was provided a copy of the PIB. Summary versions of the LACRs in Lao were not posted in the villages or at relevant offices of the districts and provinces. d. Complaints of AHs and residents, reportedly resolved at the village level, were never documented, let alone systematically monitored and tracked at the NPMO level. e. NPMO has no readily available digital copies of the results of the DMS and socioeconomic survey (SES) conducted in the 3 subprojects. 26. In light of the aforementioned, one can only conclude that project resettlement specialists failed to adequately provide guidance to the executing agency. Likewise, they did not exercise vigilance in ensuring that land acquisition and resettlement were planned and implemented according to the project resettlement policy.

VI. Lesson Learned and Follow-up Actions Required

27. Lessons that can be drawn from Phase 1 of the AISP concern proper planning and implementation of land acquisition and resettlement. They are as follows: a. There are no cutting corners in planning and implementing resettlement. A resettlement plan has to be approved first before it can be implemented. b. Voluntary donation can be discussed during public consultations and similar forums, but the decision on relinquishing one’s property in lieu of compensation should be made privately by each AH after giving the household ample time to consider its options. c. Proper documentation and a functioning data retrieval system are indispensible in resettlement planning and implementation. d. Providing AHs copies of the results of their DMS, voluntary donation forms signed, and the PIB, not to mention the posting of resettlement documents at village offices, add meaning to the public consultation and participation process.

VII. Conclusion

28. This DDR report endeavored to piece together key events that transpired in connection with the planning and execution of land acquisition and resettlement in the 3 subprojects of AISP Phase 1. Lessons could be drawn from these events, one of which concerns the systematic application of protocols in resettlement planning and implementation. Public participation and consultation in various ways, including tracking of complaints until their resolution, should be carried on a continuing basis until project completion. AHs should be provided ample time to decide on whether or not they will donate their losses in lieu of compensation, and the AHs should sign voluntary donation forms in the privacy of their homes. Likewise, a functioning documentation and data retrieval system is invaluable in managing involuntary resettlement.

29. To help put to closure land acquisition and resettlement in Phase 1, project authorities (NPMO, PPMO, and DCO) are enjoined to implement the following corrective actions: a. Amend the land records of AHs that are in the custody of the village chiefs. The amendment will clearly put on record the remaining landholdings of the AHs for which they have to pay tax. b. Return to the AHs the amounts paid in tax for plots that have already been donated to the subprojects. The mode of reimbursement should be agreed mutually by project authorities and the AHs. c. Provide each AH a copy of the voluntary donation forms they signed that include information on what they lost and the value of what they donated to the project. d. Consistent with the project resettlement policy, a post resettlement implementation evaluation should be carried out by the social safeguard external monitor to determine whether the AHs have been able to re-establish their pre-project standards of living. Those found to be living below the poverty line should be paid retroactively the replacement costs of their lost assets, calculated at the time the AHs signed voluntary land donations.

Appendix 1 Voluntary Donation Forms

Bungxe Subproject

Phanomxay Subproject

Vapy Neau Subproject

Appendix 2 Master List of Bungxe Subproject AHs

Middle AH Survey - Widow/ Female AH Head Village Mem Married Male Head No. Incom Divorced Head ber e 1 Mr. Bounsangop and Mrs. Khamphouphane Bungxe 7 x x x 2 Mrs. Leuane Sinnouvong Bungxe 12 x x x 3 Mr. Nouanphou and Mrs. Tiangkham Bungxe 8 x x x 4 Mr. Khonema and Mrs. Khanthaly Bungxe 4 x x 5 Mrs. Somh Phongsithon-thammalath Hansaysong 4 x x x 6 Mr. Bounyong and Mrs. Bounsong Hansaysong 8 x x x 7 Mr. BounOrm and Mrs. Vanny Bungxe 8 x x x 8 Mr. Champa and Mrs. Bangone Bungxe 6 x x x 9 Mrs. Bounmy Bungxe 10 x x x 10 Mr. Phone and Mrs. Lattana Hansaysong 5 x x x 11 Mr. Khamsy and Mrs. Sone Hansaysong 5 x x x 12 Mr. Soudchay and Mrs. Inh Hansaysong 10 x x x 13 Mr. Soulivanh and Mrs. Moud Hansaysong 7 x x x 14 Mrs. Khamky Hansaysong 3 x x x

Appendix 3 Land Losses of Bungxe Subproject AHs

Land Area of Total Productive Survey Unit Rate Replacement % of Affected Amount Total AH Head Affected Land Use land Owned No. (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Loss Trees* (LAK) Compensation (m2) (m2) 1 Mr. Bounsangop and Mrs. Khamphouphane 600 Fruit garden 4,000 2,400,000 18,940 3.2 5 1,030,000 3,430,000 2 Mrs. Leuane Sinnouvong 825 Fruit garden 4,000 3,300,000 103,000 0.8 13 2,440,000 5,740,000 3 Mr. Nouanphou and Mrs. Tiangkham 156 Forestland 4,000 624,000 35,000 2.8 9 3,450,000 11,196,000 750 Irrigated paddy 6,000 4,500,000 87 Rain-fed paddy 6,000 522,000 525 Fruit garden 4,000 2,100,000 4 Mr. Khonema and Mrs. Khanthaly 265.5 Forestland 4,000 1,062,000 20,000 4.9 5 1,400,000 6,755,000 715.5 Irrigated paddy 6,000 4,293,000 5 Mrs. Somh Phongsithon-thammalath 177 Forestland 4,000 708,000 3,600 4.9 10 4,550,000 5,258,000 6 Mr. Bounyong and Mrs. Bounsong 1,077 Irrigated paddy 6,000 6,462,000 80,000 1.3 4 880,000 7,342,000 7 Mr. BounOrm and Mrs. Vanny 594 Irrigated paddy 6,000 3,564,000 22,000 2.7 3 500,000 4,064,000 8 Mr. Champa and Mrs. Bangone 418.5 Irrigated paddy 6,000 2,511,000 17,000 2.5 0 0 2,511,000 9 Mrs. Bounmy 330 Irrigated paddy 6,000 1,980,000 25,000 1.4 1 200,000 2,220,000 8 Fishpond 5,000 40,000 10 Mr. Phone and Mrs. Lattana 1,305 Forestland 4,000 5,220,000 27,200 4.8 0 0 05,220,000 11 Mr. Khamsy and Mrs. Sone 427.5 Forestland 4,000 1,710,000 21,300 2.0 0 0 1,710,000 12 Mr. Soudchay and Mrs. Inh 165 Forestland 4,000 660,000 3,660 4.5 5 2,050,000 2,710,000 13 Mr. Soulivanh and Mrs. Moud 278 Forestland 4,000 1,110,000 14,790 1.9 6 2,600,000 3,710,000 14 Mrs. Khamky 547.5 Forestland 4,000 2,190,000 11,500 4.8 7 2,500,000 4,690,000

Appendix 4 Master List of Phanomxay Subproject AHs

Survey AH Middle Widow/ Female Male AH Head Village Married No. Member Income Divorced Head Head 1 Mr. Keo, Mrs. Aer Phanomxay 6 x x x 2 Mrs. Sonevilay Meksouvanh Phanomxay 7 x x x 3 Mr. Ting, Ms. Toh Phalan 6 x x x 4 Mrs. Deng Phanomxay 8 x x x 5 Mrs. Phouthong Phalan 8 x x x 6 Mr. Lae (Jan Ma) Phanomxay 8 x x x 7 Mrs. Chan Phanomxay 5 x x x 8 Mr. Phousavath (Khoun) Phanomxay 8 x x x 9 Mr. Thongphoun, Mrs. Tounkeo Phanomxay 3 x x x 10 Mrs. VanhKham Phanomxay 4 x x x 11 Mr. Boualay Phanomxay 3 x x x 12 Mr. Inpong Phanomxay 6 x x x 13 Mr. Phanmaha Phoxay 7 x x x 14 Mr. Pan Phanomxay 7 x x x 15 Mrs. Ny Phoxay 4 x x x 16 Mrs. Phengta PhalanNeau 5 x x x 17 Mr. Seng Douangvixay (Noy,Ms.Lae) PhalanNeau 9 x x x 18 Mr. Soulinthong (Lek) PhalanTai 5 x x x 19 Mr. Phone Louangmixay (Kikoane) Phoxay 5 x x x 20 Mrs. Chanthanorm Phanomxay 7 x x x 21 Mr. Phetlamphone (Tou) PhalanNeau 6 x x x 22 Mr. Sengsouli, Mrs.Monesack PhalanNeau 4 x x x 23 Mr. Sayfonh Phimpha-chanvongsoth PhalanTai 7 x x x (Soy), Mr. Khamsai's son 24 Mr. Pea, Mrs. Mork Phalan 7 x x x 25 Mr. Jao Phimpha-chanvongsoth PhalanNeau 2 x x x 26 Mr. Kinoy, Mrs.Monesack +Ms.Thaen Phanomxay 9 x x x 27 Mr. Vilakone (Aer), Mrs. Xay PhalanNeau 6 x x x 28 Mr. Long, Mrs. Loy PhalanNeau 8 x x x 29 Mr. Domh, Mrs. Soun PhalanNeau 3 x x x 30 Mrs. Douangta PhalanNeau 10 x x x 31 Mr. Keo Oudone PhalanNeau 9 x x x 32 Mr. Boua PhalanNeau 5 x x x 33 Mr. Noy Phanomyong PhalanNeau 5 x x x 34 Mrs. Somneuk PhalanNeau 6 x x x 35 Mr. Noui, Mrs. Phavady Phanomxay 4 x x x 36 Mr. Phoxay Phanth-avong, Mae Pheng Phanomxay 11 x x x 37 Mr. Vixiane (La), Mrs. Sopha Phanomxay 6 x x x 38 Mr. Lo, Mrs. Oune Phanomxay 8 x x x 39 Mr. Bounkham Fongsamouth Phanomxay 7 x x x 40 Mr. Kikeo Phothilath Phanomxay 8 x x x 41 Mr. Sengsoulid, Mrs. Vaen PhalanTai 5 x x x 42 Mr. Tone, Mrs. Khamkong PhalanNeau 12 x x x 43 Mr. Bounchaleun, Mrs. Vaen PhalanNeau 8 x x x 44 Mr. Sivone, Mrs.Saysamone PhalanNeau 8 x x x 45 Mrs. Thongsao (Wing) PhalanNeau 7 x x x 46 Mr. Oukham, Mrs. Phousouy PhalanNeau 6 x x x 47 Mr. Bouline,Mrs.Sivone PhalanNeau 4 x x x 48 Mrs. Oun PhalanNeau 7 x x x 49 Mr. Khampaseuth (Sith), Mrs.Teng PhalanNeau 8 x x x 50 Mr. Boun, Mrs.Nouka PhalanNeau 9 x x x 51 Mr. Sisavanh, Mrs.Noy PhalanNeau 4 x x x 52 Mr. Kanh, Mrs.Ammala Phanomxay 8 x x x 53 Mr. Khap Phanomxay 9 x x x 54 Mr. Ka Meuangchanh, Mrs. Nang Phanomxay 6 x x x 55 Mr. Somphone,Mrs. Noukan Phanomxay 8 x x x

Survey AH Middle Widow/ Female Male AH Head Village Married No. Member Income Divorced Head Head 56 Mrs. Thongmone (Sichanh) Louangvixay Phanomxay 4 x x x 57 Mr. Phonexay Ounphasith (Lauo) Phanomxay 11 x x 58 Mrs. Noukham Souvannasen Phanomxay 5 x x x 59 Mr. Lay Thammavixay, Mrs.Bouala Phanomxay 5 x x x 60 Mr. Bountaeng,Mrs. Bounnor Phanomxay 7 x x x 61 Mrs. Lamthong Mekphathong Phanomxay 3 x x x 62 Mrs. Nouy Phanomxay 8 x x x 63 Mrs. Keo Vongdala PhalanNeau 7 x x x 64 Mr. Visinh, Mrs. Souk PhalanTai 6 x x x 65 Mr. Malaythong, Mrs Khampheuy Phoxay 10 x x x 66 Mr. Khamsene Phoxay 10 x x x 67 Mr. Dai, Mrs.sai Phalan 8 x x x 68 Mr. Done, Mrs.Nor Phalan 8 x x x 69 Boun Niao Phalan 5 x x x 70 Mr. Khamseo Mounlaphasith Nalao 12 x x x 71 Mr. Bang, Mrs.Heuy Phanomxay 8 x x x 72 Mr. Kongthaly (Keuy) Phanomxay 10 x x x 73 Mr. Chay, Mrs. Phet Phoxay 5 x x x 74 Ms. Ting (Ban. Phontane) Phontan 4 x x x 75 Mrs. Bouapha Phanomxay 12 x x x 76 Mr. Nou, Mrs. Noui Phanomxay 8 x x x 77 Mr. Jan Leuth Phanomxay 5 x x x 78 Mr. Tiew Phanomxay 3 x x x 79 Mr. Kaenkeo, Mrs.Jao Phanomxay 12 x x x 80 Mr. Bounkham, Mrs.Malayphone Phanomxay 12 x x x 81 Mr. Kian, Mrs.Jone Phanomxay 8 x x x 82 Mr. Phaytakhard Phanomxay 5 x x x 83 Mr. Haer PhalanNeau 8 x x x 84 Mr. Leo PhalanNeau 9 x x x 85 Mr. Thongdam, Mrs. Lianthong PhalanNeau 7 x x x 86 Mr. Seun, Mrs. Wankham PhalanNeau 3 x x x 87 Mr. Viengta, Mrs. Thongmala PhalanNeau 4 x x x 88 Mr. Kanha, Mrs. Toun Sonevilay Phanomxay 3 x x x 89 Mrs. Khay Phiangkhao Phanomxay 8 x x x 90 Mrs. Somsanouk Phanomxay 8 x x x 91 Mr. Noy Thamma vixay, Mrs. Long Phanomxay 10 x x x 92 Mr. Pheuy, Mrs. Leuang Phanomxay 9 x x x 93 Mrs. Pheng Phanomxay 8 x x x 639 93 71 22 22 71

Appendix 5 Land Losses of Phanomxay Subproject AHs

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 1 Mr. Keo, Mrs. Aer 600 Pump station Fruit garden 10,000 6,000,000 32,200 4.9 16,338,000 48 Pump station Rice paddy 10,000 480,000 0 156 Pump station Rice paddy 10,000 1,560,000 0 369 Pump station Rice paddy 10,000 3,690,000 0 363 (MC) main Rice paddy 10,000 3,630,000 0 canal 46.8 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 468,000 0 17.0 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 510,000 0 2 Mrs. Sonevilay Meksouvanh 637.35 MC Rice paddy 10,000 6,373,500 30,000 3.6 10,637,500 426.4 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 4,264,000 3 Mr. Ting, Ms. Toh 975.8 MC Rice paddy 10,000 9,758,000 25,000 13,760,000 400.2 MC-RSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 4,002,000 4 Mrs. Deng 956 MC Rice paddy 10,000 9,560,000 18,000 5.3 9,560,000 5 Mrs. Phouthong 61.8 MC Rice paddy 10,000 618,000 19,990 1.3 2,688,000 207 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 2,070,000 6 Lae (Jan Ma) 135 MC Rice paddy 10,000 1,350,000 25,300 0.5 1,860,000 17.0 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 510,000 7 Mrs. Chan 478.3 MC Rice paddy 10,000 4,783,000 16,000 3.0 4,783,000 8 Mr. Phousavath (Khoun) 885.6 MC Rice paddy 10,000 8,856,000 47,764 3.2 15,383,000 652.7 MC-LSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 6,527,000 9 Mr. Thongphoun, Mrs. Tounkeo 1,230 MC Rice paddy 10,000 12,300,000 25,512 4.8 12,645,000 11.5 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 345,000 10 Mrs. VanhKham 574 MC Rice paddy 10,000 5,740,000 14,500 4.0 5,740,000 11 Mr. Boualay 992 MC Rice paddy 10,000 9,920,000 45,300 2..2 9,920,000 12 Mr. Inpong 598.6 MC Rice paddy 10,000 5,986,000 25,100 2.9 8,011,000 139.5 MC-LSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 1,395,000 21 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 630,000 13 Mr. Phanmaha 910.2 MC Rice paddy 10,000 9,102,000 38,700 4.6 17,804,000 561.2 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 5,612,000 309.0 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 3,090,000 14 Mr. Pan 377.2 MC Rice paddy 10,000 3,772,000 28,400 2.3 6,678,000 280.6 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 2,806,000 15 Mrs. Ny 57.4 MC Rice paddy 10,000 574,000 80,000 0.3 2,779,000 220.5 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 2,205,000 16 Mrs. Phengta 729.8 MC Rice paddy 10,000 7,298,000 18,000 4.5 8,093,000 79.5 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 795,000

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 17 Mr. Seng Douangvixay (Noy,Ms.Lae) 1,000.4 MC Rice paddy 10,000 10,004,000 28,000 4.4 12,764,000 225 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 2,250,000 17 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 510,000 18 Mr. Soulinthong (Lek) 885.6 MC Rice paddy 10,000 8,856,000 68,476 1.7 11,436,000 258 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 2,580,000 19 Mr. Phone Louangmixay (Kikoane) 287 MC Rice paddy 10,000 2,870,000 28,600 2.7 7,790,000 492 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 4,920,000 20 Mrs. Chanthanorm 457.6 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 4,576,000 17,500 6.4 11,245,000 666.9 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 6,669,000 21 Mr. Phetlamphone (Tou) 182 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 1,820,000 19,300 3.2 6,169,200 129.92 MC-RSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 1,299,200 305 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 3,050,000 22 Mr. Sengsouli, Mrs.Monesack 218.4 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,184,000 14,000 5.1 7,172,000 498.8 MC-RSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 4,988,000 23 Mr. Sayfonh Phimpha-chanvongsoth Soy 260 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,600,000 21,000 1.3 2,716,000 11.6 MC-RSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 116,000 24 Mr. Pea, Mrs. Mork 223.6 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,236,000 16,000 1.4 25 Mr. Jao Phimpha-chanvongsoth 343.2 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 3,432,000 17,700 1.9 26 Mr. Kinoy, Mrs.Monesack +Ms.Thaen 228.8 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,288,000 16,800 4.1 9,488,000 468 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 4,680,000 84 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 2,520,000 27 Mr. Vilakone(Aer), Mrs. Xay 400.4 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 4,004,000 16,500 3.3 5,515,000 111.1 MC-RSC1/RT1 Rice paddy 10,000 1,111,000 40 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 400,000 28 Mr. Long, Mrs. Loy 249.6 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,496,000 25,000 4.9 9,876,000 738 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 7,380,000 29 Mr. Domh, Mrs. Soun 327.6 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 3,276,000 64,884 1.0 11,274,700 289.87 MC-RSC1/RT1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,898,700 510 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 5,100,00 30 Mrs. Douangta 135.2 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 1,352,000 32,900 4.6 14,735,700 78 MC-RSC1 Fishpond 5,000 390,000 441.37 MC-RSC1/RT1 Rice paddy 10,000 4,413,700 858 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 8,580,000 31 Mr. Keo Oudone 920.4 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 9,204,000 24,150 4.5 158 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 1,580,000 32 Mr. Boua 608.4 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 6,084,000 38,800 3.9 15,288,000 189 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 1,890,000 239.4 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 2,394,000

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 492 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 4,920,000 33 Mr. Noy Phanomyong 374.4 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 3,744,000 37,955 3.5 13,284,000 414 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 4,140,000 540 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 5,400,000 34 Mrs. Somneuk 150.8 MC-RSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 1,508,000 28,940 3.1 8,873,000 220.5 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 2,205,000 516 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 5,160,000 35 Mr. Noui, Mrs. Phavady 180 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 1,800,000 32,060 0.6 1,800,000 36 Mr. Phoxay Phanth-avong, Mae Pheng 211.5 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 2,115,000 15,000 1.4 2,115,000 37 Mr. Vixiane (La), Mrs. Sopha 414 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 4,140,000 17,100 2.4 4,140,000 38 Mr. Lo, Mrs. Oune 504 MC-RSC3 Rice paddy 10,000 5,040,000 35,000 1.4 5,040,000 39 Mr. Bounkham Fongsamouth 494.1 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 4,941,000 25,000 2.0 4,941,000 40 Mr. Kikeo Phothilath 1,372.5 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 13,725 38,000 3.6 13,725 41 Mr. Sengsoulid, Mrs. Vaen 183 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 1,830,000 8,320 2.2 1,830,000 42 Mr. Tone, Mrs. Khamkong 976 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 9,760,000 29,650 3.3 9,760,000 43 Mr. Bounchaleun, Mrs. Vaen 244 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 2,440,000 15,000 1.6 2,440,000 44 Mr. Sivone, Mrs.Saysamone 610 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 6,100,000 13,000 4.7 6,100,000 45 Mrs. Thongsao (Wing) 585.6 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 5,856,000 15,000 3.9 5,856,000 46 Mr. Oukham, Mrs. Phousouy 605.7 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 6,057,000 48,096 1.3 6,057,000 47 Mr. Bouline,Mrs.Sivone 60 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 600,000 64,884 0.1 600,000 48 Mrs. Oun 52.5 MC-RSC4 Fishpond 5,000 262,500 30,000 1.4 2,075,000 362.50 Drain Fishpond 5,000 1,812,500 49 Mr. Khampaseuth (Sith), Mrs.Teng 218.3 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 2,183,000 35,000 0.6 2,183,000 50 Mr. Boun, Mrs.Nouka 75 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 750,000 37,955 0.2 750,000 51 Mr. Sisavanh, Mrs.Noy 32.5 MC-RSC4 Rice paddy 10,000 325,000 18,000 0.2 325,000 52 Mr. Kanh, Mrs.Ammala 280.6 MC-LSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,806,000 20,700 1.4 2,806,000 53 Mr. Khap 774.7 MC-LSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 7,747,000 21,900 3.9 8,322,000 115 Drain Fishpond 5,000 575,000 54 Mr. Ka Meuangchanh, Mrs. Nang 779.8 MC-LSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 7,798,000 28,284 7,798,000 55 Mr. Somphone,Mrs. Noukan 632.9 MC-LSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 6,329,000 30,000 3.5 10,607,000 427.8 MC-LSC1/RT1 Rice paddy 10,000 4,278,000 56 Mrs. Thongmone (Sichanh) Louangvixay 585.6 MC-LSC1 Rice paddy 10,000 5,856,000 40,000 3.5 14,040,000 607.6 MC-LSC1/LT1 Rice paddy 10,000 6,076,000 210.8 MC-LSC1/RT1 Rice paddy 10,000 2,108,000 57 Mr. Phonexay Ounphasith(Lauo) 1,097.4 MC-LSC1/LT1 Rice paddy 10,000 10,974,000 25,000 4.4 10,974,000 58 Mrs. Noukham Souvannasen 1,159.4 MC-LSC1/RT1 Rice paddy 10,000 11,594,000 40,000 2.9 11,654,000 12 MC-LSC1/RT1 Fishpond 5,000 60,000 59 Mr. Lay Thammavixay, Mrs.Bouala 441 MC-LSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 4,410,000 25,000 1.8 5,370,000

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 32 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 960,000 60 Mr. Bountaeng,Mrs. Bounnor 531 MC-LSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 5,310,000 27,000 3.9 8,697,500 367.5 Drain Fishpond 5,000 1,837,500 155 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 1,550,000 61 Mrs. Lamthong Mekphathong 796.5 MC-LSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 7,965,000 90,000 0.9 7,965,000 62 Mrs. Nouy 567 MC-LSC2 Rice paddy 10,000 5,670,000 16,600 3.4 5,670,000 63 Mrs. Keo Vongdala 906.3 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 9,063,000 40,000 3.2 12,723,000 366 Farm road 1 Rice paddy 10,000 3,660,000 64 Mr. Visinh, Mrs. Souk 339.15 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 3,391,500 34,200 1.0 3,391,500 65 Mr. Malaythong, Mrs Khampheuy 74.1 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 741,000 15,000 0.5 741,000 66 Mr. Khamsene 91.2 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 912,000 35,000 0.3 912,000 67 Mr. Dai, Mrs.sai 1,721.4 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 17,214,000 40,199 4.3 17,214,000 68 Mr. Done, Mrs.Nor 1,704.3 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 17,043,000 36,000 4.7 17,043,000 69 Boun Niao 672.6 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 6,726,000 41,600 1.6 6,726,000 70 Mr. Khamseo Mounlaphasith 239.4 RMC Rice paddy 10,000 2,394,000 90,000 0.3 2,394,000 71 Mr. Bang, Mrs.Heuy 595.5 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 5,955,000 41,450 1.4 5,955,000 72 Mr. Kongthaly (Keuy) 142.5 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 1,425,000 20,000 0.7 1,425,000 73 Mr. Chay, Mrs. Phet 114 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 1,140,000 10,000 1.1 1,140,000 74 Ms. Ting(Ban. Phontane) 87 Drain Rice paddy 10,000 870,000 10,000 0.9 870,000 75 Mrs. Bouapha 16.5 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 495,000 - - 495,000 76 Mr. Nou, Mrs. Noui - Farm road 1 Trees - 0 0 77 Mr. Jan Leuth - Farm road 1 Structure/tree - 0 0 78 Mr. Tiew 49.50 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 1,485,000 - - 2,115,000 21 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 630,000 79 Mr. Kaenkeo, Mrs.Jao 14 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 420,000 - - 420,000 80 Mr. Bounkham, Mrs.Malayphone 20 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 600,000 - - 600,000 81 Mr. Kian, Mrs.Jone 11 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 330,000 - - 330,000 82 Mr. Phaytakhard - Farm road 1 Trees - 0 0 19 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 570,000 570,000 83 Mr. Haer 8.5 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 255,000 255,000 84 Mr. Leo 7.5 Farm road 1 Residential land 30,000 225,000 225,000 85 Mr. Thongdam, Mrs. Lianthong - Farm road 1 Structure - 0 0 86 Mr. Seun, Mrs. Wankham - Farm road 1 Structure - 0 0 87 Mr. Viengta, Mrs. Thongmala - Farm road 1 Structure - 0 0 88 Mr. Kanha, Mrs. Toun Sonevilay 41 Farm road 3 Residential land 30,000 1,230,000 - 1,230,000 89 Mrs. Khay Phiangkhao - Farm road 3 Trees - 0 90 Mrs. Somsanouk Farm road 3 Structure - 0 91 Mr. Noy Thamma Vixay, Mrs. Long Farm road 3 Structure - 0

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 92 Mr. Pheuy, Mrs. Leuang 23 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 690,000 - - 690,000 93 Mrs. Pheng 37 Farm road 4 Residential land 30,000 1,110,000 - - 1,110,000

Appendix 6 Master List of Vapy Neau Subproject AHs

Survey AH Middle Widow/ Female Male AH Head Village Married No. Member Income Divorced Head Head 1 Mr Boualid, Mrs Bouala Vapy 12 x x x 2 Mr. Khamta, Mrs Bouaphan Vapy 5 x x x 3 Mr. Khong, Mrs. Pao Vapy 6 x x x 4 Mr. Thidki, Mrs Lay Vapy 4 x x x 5 Mr. Yommala B, Mrs. Davanh Vapy 7 x x x 6 Mr. Phetsaman (Toui), Mrs. Chanthone Vapy 6 x x x 7 Mr.Y ommala A, Mrs. Vongthong Vapy 8 x x x 8 Mr. Khammy, Mrs. Phoxay Vapy 4 x x x 9 Mr. Theva, Mrs. Ketmany Vapy 6 x x x 10 Mr. Khamphui, Mrs. Khampiene Vapy 6 x x x 11 Mr.Tou, Mrs. Chantha Vapy 7 x x x 12 Mr. My, Mrs. Liane Vapy 7 x x x 13 Mr. Bounsay Vapy 8 x x x 14 Mr. Te, Mrs. Khanh Vapy 4 x x x 15 Mr. Ngiang, Mrs. La Vapy 6 x x x 16 Mr. Jan Soun, Mrs. Doklam Vapy 8 x x x 17 Mr. Saly, Mrs. Khek Khonesay 5 x x x 18 Mr. Tanh, Mrs. Beuy Khonesay 6 x x x 19 Mr. Van, Mrs. Mong Khonesay 7 x x x 20 Mr. Ketmany (Deuk), Mrs. Phanh Khonesay 5 x x x 21 Mr. Phouthon, Mrs. Van Khonesay 7 x x x 22 Mr. Sith, Mrs. Aer Noi Khonesay 6 x x x 23 Mr. Mai, Mrs. Komkong Khonesay 6 x x x 24 Ms. Souyvilay (Phor Thao Bong/Laem) Khonesay 3 x x x 25 Mr. Xiang Aer, Mrs. Chantho Vapy 4 x x x 26 Mr. Phay, Mrs. Baen Vapy 6 x x x 27 Mr. Aersakhone, Mrs. Phouangmalay Vapy 5 x x x 28 Ms. Mae Nou Vapy 8 x x x 29 Mr. Kongmany, Mrs. Latsamy Vapy 7 x x x 30 Mr. Phouvieng, Mrs. Let Vapy 6 x x x 31 Mr. Lid, Mrs. Phouvieng Vapy 7 x x x 32 Mr. Leu, Mrs.Thoumma Vapy 7 x x x 33 Ms. Mae Thao Leuang Douangphaxay Vapy 3 x x x 34 Mr. Soulaphone, Mrs. Phetdavanh Vapy 4 x x x 35 Mr. Khambone, Mrs. Khaophone Vapy 3 x x x 36 Mr. Xiangkham Vapy 4 x x x 37 Mr. Teu, Ms. Douang Vapy 5 x x x 38 Mr.Toui, Mrs. Simone Vapy 7 x x x 39 Mr. Aerphouvong, Mrs. Noy Vapy 7 x x x 40 Ms. Chanh Phetmanysay (Mr. Touy) Vapy 5 x x x 41 Ms. Khaykham (Mr. Jan Bounkham) Vapy 7 x x x 42 Ms. Bounmy (Mr. Noy) Vapy 5 x x x 43 Mr. Khamla, Mrs. Morm Vapy 8 x x x 44 Mr. Eila, Ms. Noy Vapy 7 x x x 45 Mr. Xiangla, Mrs. Liam Vapy 5 x x x 46 Mr. Somphone (Souk A), Mrs. Thiane Vapy 6 x x x 47 Mr. Khen, Mrs. La Vapy 4 x x x 48 Mr. Kanha, Mrs. Si Onkeo Houykhon 6 x x x 49 Mr. Jouang, Mrs. Nouane Khonesay 5 x x x 50 Mr. Porm, Mrs. Phouvanh Khonesay 9 x x x 51 Mr. Pheuy, Mrs. Lai Khonesay 4 x x x 52 Mr. Jan Toune, Mrs. Phouvanh Khonesay 8 x x x 53 Mr. Phou, Mrs. Simone (Khamh) Khonesay 7 x x x 54 Mr. Done, Mrs. Pheua Donement 5 x x x 55 Mr. Phanh, Ms. Savy (Ms.Theung) Vapy 7 x x x 56 Mr. Sakhone, Mrs. Liap Vapy 5 x x x

Survey AH Middle Widow/ Female Male AH Head Village Married No. Member Income Divorced Head Head 57 Mr. Nane Viphakone, Mrs. Deng Vapy 5 x x x 58 Mr. Pany, Mrs. Siamphone Vapy 10 x x x 59 Mr. Vixay, Mrs. Bounchanh Vapy 10 x x x 60 Mr. Bounchan, Mrs. Keuthmy Vapy 6 x x x 61 Mr. Vanpheng, Mrs. Phayvanh Vapy 5 x x x 62 Mr. Somchay, Mrs. Bounseum Vapy 8 x x x 63 Mr. Ki, Mrs. Orady Vapy 9 x x x 64 Mr. Joy, Mrs. Patthoumma Khonesay 6 x x x 65 Mr.K ate, Mrs .Khor Khonesay 7 x x x 66 Mr. Khomsinh, Mrs. Chanthachone Khonesay 4 x x x 67 Mr. Chanh/Mr. Chone, Mrs. Khone Khonesay 4 x x x 68 Mr. Kitanh, Mrs. Lone Khonesay 6 x x x 69 Mr. Khamdeng, Mrs. Khong Khonesay 6 x x x 70 Mr Khankham, Mrs. Keomichay Khonesay 8 x x x 71 Mr. Bounchanh, Mrs. Sonesamouth Khonesay 8 x x x 72 Mrs. Aer (Mae Thao Thong Houad) Khonesay 8 x x x 73 Mr. Bounthong, Mrs. Bouakhay Khonesay 4 x x x 74 Mr. Khiang, Mrs. Somsay Khonesay 3 x x x 75 Mr. Souane, Mrs. Thongmany Nasad 4 x x x 76 Mr. Aer Hou, Mrs. Pheng Vapy 4 x x x 77 Mr. Tor, Mrs. Lae Vapy 4 x x x 78 Mr. Sengphet (Kane) (Widow) Vapy 5 x x x 79 Mr. Kor, Mrs. Lae Vapy 5 x x x 80 Mr. Khambai, Ms. Douangchanh Vapy 7 x x x 81 Mr. Seun, Mrs. Lay Khonesay 8 x x x 82 Mr. Soubanh, Mrs. Montha Vapy 6 x x x 83 Mr. Khamphay, Mrs. Nouay Donekha 6 x x x 84 Mr. Mimak, Mrs. Monh Khonesay 5 x x x 85 Mr. Kiang Yavong, Mrs. Vilayvanh Vapy 7 x x x 86 Mr.V ilay, Mrs. Chanh Vapy 7 x x x 87 Mr. Khamsay, Mrs. Syphong Vapy 6 x x x 88 Mrs. Boualom Vapy 4 x x x 89 Mr. Orng A, Mrs. Khoun Vapy 9 x x x 90 Mr. Khamlay, Mrs. Vong Vapy 6 x x x 91 Mr. Vixay, Mrs. Kankong Vapy 6 x x x 92 Mr. Khamphoun, Mrs. Boualien Vapy 8 x x x 93 Mr. Xaypadith (Jek), Mrs. Khankham Vapy 5 x x x 94 Ms. Samlane (widow) Vapy 5 x x x 95 Mr. Oudone(Jan Done), Mrs. Latthida Vapy 5 x x x 96 Mrs. Chanthavilay (widow) Vapy 6 x x x 97 Mr. Khamphien, Mrs. Phouvanh Vapy 5 x x x 98 Mr. Gnouy, Mrs. Soy Vapy 5 x x x 99 Mrs. Chay (widow) Vapy 7 x x x 100 Mr.Phoxay, Mrs.Boualien Vapy 8 x x 101 Ms.Somphan (widow) Donekha 6 x x x 102 Mrs. Kone Pengsavath (widow) Donekha 6 x x x 103 Mr. Khamlay, Mrs. Kiao Donekha 4 x x x 104 Mr. Oud, Mrs. Vipakone Donekha 8 x x x 105 Mr.Thong Houat, Mrs. Thoumma Khonesay 4 x x x 633 105 92 13 13 92

Appendix 7 Land Losses of Vapy Neau AHs Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total Cases AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 1 1 Mr Boualid, Mrs Bouala 13.5 Pump station Residential land 20,000 174,000 - - 270,000 1 2 Mr. Khamta, Mrs Bouaphan 15.0 Pump station Residential land 20,000 300,000 - - 300,000 1 3 Mr. Khong, Mrs. Pao 13.5 Pump station Garden 2,000 27,000 750 1.8 27,000 2 4 Mr. Thidki, Mrs Lay 642 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 9,630,000 29,285 3.2 13,970,000 276 Canal LSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,140,000 20 Canal LSC1 Fishpond 10,000 200,000 2 5 Mr. Yommala B, Mrs. Davanh 272 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,080,000 34,500 1.6 8,490,000 294 Canal LSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,410,000 1 6 Mr. Phetsaman (Toui), Mrs. Chanthone 290 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,350,000 8,967 3.2 4,350,000 1 7 Mr. Yommala A, Mrs. Vongthong 256 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 3,840,000 8,546 3.0 3,840,000 3 8 Mr. Khammy, Mrs. Phoxay 390 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 5,850,000 29,690 3.3 13,494,000 228 Canal RSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 3,420,000 352 Canal TC1 Raid-fed paddy 12,000 4,224,000 1 9 Mr. Theva, Mrs. Ketmany 120 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 1,800,000 24,400 0.5 1,800,000 1 10 Mr. Khamphui, Mrs. Khampiene 550 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 8,250,000 11,654 4.7 8,250,000 3 11 Mr. Tou, Mrs. Chantha 154 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,310,000 14,544 8.8 19,200,000 616 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 9,240,000 510 Canal RSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 7,650,000 1 12 Mr. My, Mrs. Liane 222 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 3,330,000 11,654 1.9 3,330,000 1 13 Mr. Bounsay 290 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,350,000 14,730 2.6 5,350,000 100 MC Fishpond 10,000 1,000,000 1 14 Mr. Te, Mrs. Khanh 152 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,280,000 10,500 1.4 2,280,000 1 15 Mr. Ngiang, Mrs. La 112 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 1,680,000 2,800 4.0 1,680,000 2 16 Mr. Jan Soun, Mrs. Doklam 856 MC Irrig. paddy 15,000 12,840,000 43,877 2.3 15,360,000 168 Canal RSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,520,000 1 17 Mr. Saly, Mrs. Khek 624 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,488,000 21,946 2.8 7,488,000 2 18 Mr. Tanh, Mrs. Beuy 1,144 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 17,160,000 39,500 3.3 19,008,000 36 MC Fishpond 10,000 360,000 124 Canal TC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,488,000 2 19 Mr. Van, Mrs. Mong 592 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,104,000 34,540 4.9 20,496,000 1,116b Canal TC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 13,392,000c 3 20 Mr. Ketmany (Deuk), Mrs. Phanh 960 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 11,520,000 29,978 7.3 25,712,000 816 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 9,792,000 320 MC Fishpond 10,000 3,200,000 100 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,200,000 1 21 Mr. Phouthon, Mrs. Van 1,128 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 13,536,000x 23,500 4.8 13,536,000

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total Cases AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 3 22 Mr. Sith, Mrs. Aer Noi 2,272 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 27,264,000 69,880 5.0 41,700,000 414 Canal RSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 4,968,000 789 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 9,468,000 1 23 Mr. Mai, Mrs. Komkong 648 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,776,000 20,800 3.1 2 24 Ms. Souyvilay (Phor Thao Bong/Laem) 608 MC Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,296,000 34,000 2.7 10,896,000 300 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,600,000 1 25 Mr. Xiang Aer, Mrs. Chantho 790 Canal RSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 11,850,000 18,986 4.2 11,850,000 1 26 Mr. Phay, Mrs. Baen 110 Canal RSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 1,650,000 2,300 4.8 1,650,000 1 27 Mr. Aersakhone, Mrs. Phouangmalay 290 Canal RSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,350,000 70,173 0.4 4,350,000 1 28 Ms. Mae Nou Trees Canal LSC1 ------1 29 Mr. Kongmany, Mrs. Latsamy 60 Canal LSC1 Fishpond 10,000 600,000 6,282 1.0 600,000 1 30 Mr. Phouvieng, Mrs. Let Structure Canal LSC1 ------1 31 Mr. Lid, Mrs. Phouvieng 76 Canal LSC1 Fishpond 10,000 760,000 10,150 0.7 760,000 2 32 Mr. Leu, Mrs.Thoumma 168 Canal LSC1 Fishpond 10,000 1,680,000 30,000 1.6 5,328,000 304 Canal TC1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,648,000 1 33 Ms. Mae Thao Leuang Douangphaxay 136 Canal LSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,040,000 5,000 2.7 2,040,000 1 34 Mr. Soulaphone, Mrs. Phetdavanh 520 Canal LSC1 Irrig. paddy 15,000 7,800,000 45,897 1.1 7,800,000 4 35 Mr. Khambone, Mrs. Khaophone 1,158 Canal RSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 17,370,000 28,300 7.1 29,598,000 636 Canal LSC3 Irrig. paddy 15,000 9,540,000 56 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 672,000 168 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,016,000 2 36 Mr. Xiangkham 350 Canal LSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 5,250,000 25,374 1.9 7,350,000 140 Canal LSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,100,000 1 37 Mr. Teu, Ms. Douang 194 Canal LSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,910,000 5,594 3.5 2,910,000 1 38 Mr.Toui, Mrs. Simone 332 Canal LSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,980,000 74,344 0.4 4,980,000 1 39 Mr. Aerphouvong, Mrs. Noy 172 Canal LSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,580,000 40,000 0.4 2,580,000 1 40 Ms. Chanh Phetmanysay (Mr. Touy) 638 Canal LSC2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 9,570,000 14,608 4.4 9,570,000 2 41 Ms. Khaykham (Mr. Jan Bounkham) 324 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,888,000 16,900 2.9 5,808,000 160 Canal TC1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,920,000 1 42 Ms. Bounmy (Mr. Noy) 510 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 6,120,000 21,334 2.4 6,120,000 1 43 Mr. Khamla, Mrs. Morm 492 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 5,904,000 10,797 4.6 5,904,000 1 44 Mr. Eila, Ms. Noy 546 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 6,552,000 11,322 4.8 6,552,000 2 45 Mr. Xiangla, Mrs. Liam 288 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,456,000 42,466 2.2 11,160,000 642 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,704,000 1 46 Mr. Somphone (Souk A), Mrs. Thiane 162 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,944,000 17,105 0.9 1,944,000 1 47 Mr. Khen, Mrs. La 930 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 11,160,000 19,000 4.9 11,160,000 2 48 Mr. Kanha, Mrs. Si Onkeo 270 Canal LSC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,240,000 97,593 1.0 11,988,000 729 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 8,748,000

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total Cases AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 1 49 Mr. Jouang, Mrs. Nouane 570 Canal RSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 6,840,000n 18,160 3.1 6,840,000 3 50 Mr. Porm, Mrs. Phouvanh 396 Canal RSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 4,752,000 14,456 2.7 10,272,000 252 Canal LSC4 Residential land 20,000 5,040,000 24 Canal TC2 Residential land 20,000 480,000 2 51 Mr. Pheuy, Mrs. Lai 318 Canal RSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,816,000 30,800 1.4 5,256,000 120 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,440,000 2 52 Mr. Jan Toune, Mrs. Phouvanh 1,500 Canal RSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 18,000,000 57,700 5.0 34,632,000 1,386 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 16,632,000 1 53 Mr. Phou, Mrs. Simone (Khamh) 195 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,340,000 20,000 1.0 2,340,000 1 54 Mr. Done, Mrs. Pheua 603 Canal LSC3 Irrig. paddy 15,000 9,045,000 18,720 3.2 9,045,000 1 55 Mr. Phanh, Ms. Savy (Ms.Theung) 846 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 10,152,000 18,385 4.6 10,152,000 1 56 Mr. Sakhone, Mrs. Liap 1,992 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 23,904,000 61,015 3.3 23,904,000 1 57 Mr. Nane Viphakone, Mrs. Deng 396 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 4,752,000 11,216 3.5 4,752,000 1 58 Mr. Pany, Mrs. Siamphone 1,452 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 17,424,000 41,340 3.5 17,424,000 1 59 Mr. Vixay, Mrs. Bounchanh 1452 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 17,424,000 29,939 4.8 17,424,000 2 60 Mr. Bounchan, Mrs. Keuthmy 672 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 8,064,000 30,000 2.8 9,936,000 156 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,872,000 1 61 Mr. Vanpheng, Mrs. Phayvanh 558 Canal LSC3 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 6,696,000 17,850 3.1 6,696,000 1 62 Mr. Somchay, Mrs. Bounseum 600 Canal LSC3 Irrig. paddy 15,000 9,000,000 15,704 3.8 9,000,000 1 63 Mr. Ki, Mrs. Orady 936 Canal LSC3 Irrig. paddy 15,000 14,040,000 20,638 4.5 14,040,000 1 64 Mr. Joy, Mrs. Patthoumma 838 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 10,008,000 18,535 4.5 10,008,000 1 65 Mr. Kate, Mrs .Khor 648 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,776,000 25,380 2.6 7,776,000 1 66 Mr. Khomsinh, Mrs. Chanthachone 759 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 9,108,000 16,660 4.6 9,108,000 1 67 Mr. Chanh/Mr. Chone, Mrs. Khone 153 Canal RSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,836,000 27,000 0.6 1,836,000 2 68 Mr. Kitanh, Mrs. Lone 774 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 9,288,000 30,890 3.4 12,600,000 276 Canal TC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,312,000 1 69 Mr. Khamdeng, Mrs. Khong 1,080 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 12,960,000 30,300 3.6 12,960,000 1 70 Mr Khankham, Mrs. Keomichay 120 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,440,000 10,200 1.2 1,440,000 1 71 Mr. Bounchanh, Mrs. Sonesamouth 192 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,304,000 4,124 4.7 2,304,000 2 72 Mrs. Aer (Mae Thao Thong Houad) 978 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 11,736,000 34,500 2.9 12,060,000 27 Road 1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 324,000 1 73 Mr. Bounthong, Mrs. Bouakhay 1,170 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 14,040,000 24,560 4.8 14,040,000 1 74 Mr. Khiang, Mrs. Somsay 312 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,744,000 7,500 4.2 3,744,000 1 75 Mr. Souane, Mrs. Thongmany 486 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 5,832,000 14,320 3.4 5,832,000 1 76 Mr. Aer Hou, Mrs. Pheng 420 Canal LSC4 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 5,040,000 10,600 4.0 5,040,000 1 77 Mr. Tor, Mrs. Lae 464 Canal TC1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 5,568,000 26,098 1.8 5,5,68,000 1 78 Mr. Sengphet (Kane) (Widow) 960 Canal TC1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 11,520,000 35,000 2.7 11,520,000 1 79 Mr. Kor, Mrs. Lae 360 Canal TC1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 4,320,000 15,840 2.7 4,960,000

Total Land Area Productive Productive Survey Location of Unit Rate Replacement Total Cases AH Head of Affected Land Use land land % of No. Affected Asset (LAK)/m2 Cost (LAK) Compensation (m2) Owned Loss (m2) 64 Canal TC1 Fishpond 10,000 640,000 1 80 Mr. Khambai, Ms. Douangchanh 80 Canal TC1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 960,000 12,926 0.6 9960,000 1 81 Mr. Seun, Mrs. Lay 296 Canal TC2 Residential land 20,000 5,920,000 - - 5,920,000 1 82 Mr. Soubanh, Mrs. Montha 1,172 Canal TC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 14,064,000 36,858 3.2 14,064,000 1 83 Mr. Khamphay, Mrs. Nouay 408 Canal TC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 4,896,000 40,800 1.0 4,896,000 1 84 Mr. Mimak, Mrs. Monh 72 Canal TC2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 864,000 20,300 0.4 864,000 1 85 Mr. Kiang Yavong, Mrs. Vilayvanh 192 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,304,000 30,500 0.6 2,304,000 1 86 Mr. V ilay, Mrs. Chanh 198 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,376,000 73,000 0.3 2,376,000 1 87 Mr. Khamsay, Mrs. Syphong 124 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,488,000 40,000 0.3 1,488,000 2 88 Mrs. Boualom 261 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,132,000 51,123 1.1 7,362,000 282 Canal DR2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 4,230,000 1 89 Mr. Orng A, Mrs. Khoun 212 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,544,000 40,000 0.5 2,544,000 1 90 Mr. Khamlay, Mrs. Vong 205 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,460,000 19,000 1.1 2,460,000 1 91 Mr. Vixay, Mrs. Kankong 117 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,404,000 40,399 0.3 1,404,000 1 92 Mr. Khamphoun, Mrs. Boualien 62 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 744,000 4,800 1.3 744,000 1 93 Mr. Xaypadith (Jek), Mrs. Khankham 158 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,896,000 30,500 0.5 1,896,000 1 94 Ms. Samlane (widow) 232 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 2,784,000 5,575 4.2 2,784,000 2 95 Mr. Oudone (Jan Done), Mrs. Latthida 605 Canal DR1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,260,000 12,947 6.7 10,380,000 260 Canal DR2 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,120,000 1 96 Mrs. Chanthavilay (widow) 374 Canal DR2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 5,610,000 50,399 0.7 5,610,000 1 97 Mr. Khamphien, Mrs. Phouvanh 56 Canal DR2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 840,000 28,300 0.2 840,000 1 98 Mr. Gnouy, Mrs. Soy 224 Canal DR2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 3,360,000 11,514 2.8 4,360,000 100 Canal DR2 Fishpond 10,000 1,000,000 1 99 Mrs. Chay (widow) 200 Canal DR2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 3,000,000 4,751 4.2 3,000,000 1 100 Mr.Phoxay, Mrs.Boualien 135 Canal DR2 Irrig. paddy 15,000 2,025,000 40,000 0.3 2,025,000 1 101 Ms.Somphan (widow) 116 Road 1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 1,392,000 52,800 0.2 1,392,000 1 102 Mrs. Kone Pengsavath (widow) 429 Road 1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 5,148,000 39,200 1.1 5,148,000 1 103 Mr. Khamlay, Mrs. Kiao 302 Road 1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 3,624,000 25,000 1.2 3,624,000 1 104 Mr. Oud, Mrs. Vipakone 597 Road 1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 7,164,000 27,660 2.2 7,164,000 1 105 Mr.Thong Houat, Mrs. Thoumma 484 Road 1 Rain-fed paddy 12,000 5,808,000 28,400 1.7 5,808,000

Appendix 8 DDR Mission Meeting in Bungxe Village, 23 September 2019

Meeting in the village pagoda 3 pumps

3 electric motors powering the pumps Pumped water is discharged into the main canal

Appendix 9 DDR Mission Meeting in Phanomxay Village, 23 September 2019

Meeting in the village pagoda Pump on a raft

Damaged pipe culvert built by the subproject Sides of secondary canal where braces are located have cracks

Village official showing the defective work Plastering the defective work did not stop water from leaking

Lateral (secondary) canal service road has eroded Even the lateral canal is defective

Appendix 10 DDR Mission Meeting in Vapy Neau Village, 25 September 2019

Meeting with village and WUG officials Main canal from the pump station

Power transformer was submerged during the recent flood Xedon River overflowed its banks and caused erosion at the pump station