DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Houston Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Houston Framework URBAN HOUSTON FRAMEWORK Houston, Texas A CASE STUDY FOR THE H-GAC REGIONAL PLAN FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT May 2013 Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Members: Linda Porras-Pirtle - Planning Commissioner (SAC Chair) Keiji Asakura - Planning Commissioner Antoine Bryant - Planning Commissioner Veronica Chapa-Jones - COH - Housing and Community Development Marlene Gafrick - COH - Planning and Development Mark Loethen - COH - Public Works and Engineering Diane Schenke - Greater East End Management District Ashby Johnson - H-GAC - Transportation & Air Quality Jeff Taebel - H-GAC – Community & Environmental Filo Castore - American Institute of Architects (AIA) Ed Taravela - Greater Houston Builders Association (GHBA) Casey Morgan - Greater Houston Builders Association (GHBA) David Crossley - Houston Tomorrow Bob Collins - Houston Real Estate Council (HREC) Bill Huntsinger - Houston Real Estate Council (HREC) Joshua Sanders - Houstonians for Responsible Growth (HRG) Amanda Timm - Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC) Clint Harbert - Metropolitan Transit Authority (METRO) Kim Slaughter - Metropolitan Transit Authority (METRO) Shon Link - Urban Land Institute (ULI) Irma Sanchez - Westchase District URBAN HOUSTON FRAMEWORK A Case Study for the H-GAC Regional Plan for Sustainable Development May 2013 Client contact: Kelly Porter, AICP Regional Planner Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) 3555 Timmons, Suite 120, Houston, TX 77027 [email protected] 713.993.4529 Amar Mohite Administration Manager City of Houston Planning & Development Department 611 Walker Street, 6th Floor, Houston, TX 77002 [email protected] 713.837.7701 Consultant contact: Rebecca Leonard, AICP, LEED-AP Principal Design Workshop, Inc. 800 Brazos Street, Suite 490, Austin, TX 78701 [email protected] 512.499.0222 Images are from a variety of sources, all of which Design Workshop has obtained rights to use. Executive Summary Project Background Throughout the nation, Texas and As the fourth largest city in the US, and Houston-Galveston area, policy mak- with an array of new residents moving to U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ers, planning organizations, community Houston every day, the development of U.S. Department of Transportation residents, real estate developers, transit a Framework which promotes a more U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proponents and housing interests are sustainable and targeted approach to striving to prioritize and implement Houston’s current development practices projects, policies, and programs that will is vital to the greater success of the lead to more vibrant, healthy and acces- region as a whole. As such, the purpose sible communities. of this Study is to develop a comprehen- sive Toolbox of policy and regulatory Houston-Galveston State and Local The Houston-Galveston Area Council incentives that Houston can use to stra- Area Council (H-GAC) Funding Partners (H-GAC) – in conjunction with the City tegically encourage dense, sustainable of Houston, Harris County and 22 other Urban Centers in appropriate locations, regional partners – applied for and while maintaining the character of exist- received a 3.75 million dollar regional ing neighborhoods. planning grant administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban De- The intent of the Urban Houston Frame- velopment’s Sustainable Communities work is to help integrate land use and City of Houston Initiative, and funded in partnership with transportation planning by coordinating the U.S. Department of Transportation land development standards with new (DOT) and Environmental Protection transit investments, and by providing af- Agency (EPA). To learn more about the fordable housing in dense areas around greater Houston-Galveston Regional new transit lines. Plan for Sustainable Development as it relates to the 13-County Texas Gulf The importance of creating a Frame- Coast Planning Region, please visit: work now is that, despite strong growth, http://www.ourregion.org/. there are no comprehensive policies to encourage sustainable forms of develop- A portion of these funds are being used ment in Houston. Today, Houston is a stakeholders to test six case studies throughout the polycentric city facing many challenges region, one of which is highlighted by in promoting walkable, bikeable areas this Urban Houston Framework. with a balance of housing and jobs. Figure 1: Urban Houston Framework Partners Urban Houston Framework | 4 Executive Summary In response to the unique diversity within Table 1: Key Findings Houston’s existing context, the Study VISION CATEGORIES GOAL CHARACTERISTIC MEASURABLE CHARACTERISTICS works to evaluate what constitutes an OF CENTERS Urban Center – or an area of live/work/ play – where all individuals congregate Residential Density (Dwelling Units) providing for maximum use of existing Housing Type Address local Housing Character, Housing Affordability city and regional resources including, and regional Diversity Housing Choice and Mobility (Fair Housing Factor) but not limited to, enhanced pedestrian housing needs Housing Starts (New Construction) and transportation related infrastructure/ Mixed-Land Use (Housing and Localized Services) services, coordinated utilities, drainage Contribute to Vacant Land (%) as well as other benefits detailed in this Infill/ Redevelopment high- quality Improvement to Land Value Ratio Study. Potential infrastructure Significant Potential for Development/Redevelopment Funding Mechanism, Management District However, recognizing that “one size Management Entity Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) does not fit all” this Study works to iden- Encourage Land Use Diversity Index tify the proper characteristics that com- economic Average Residential/Commercial/Office FAR viability and prise such Centers, as well as evaluate Urban Centers diversity Land Use Diversity Impervious/Pervious Cover Ratio the tools required to help ensure such are vibrant Area of Center in Acres development practices. Table 1: Key places in which Large Centers people from Medium Centers Parks and Open Space Findings summarizes conclusions all walks of life Small Centers High Employment, Job Density identified by stakeholders throughout the can live, work Enhance Population Density Population Density Urban Houston Framework. and play community stability, Access to Amenities, Amenity Density accessibility Attractions, Amenity Diversity The findings of the Urban Houston and equity Destinations National/Regional (vs. Local) Attractions/Destinations Framework are intended not only to in- Promote Bikeway Density crease housing, economic and transpor- Bike/Pedestrian sustainable, Trail Density tation opportunities at the local level, but Accessibility healthy design Sidewalk Accessibility also demonstrate various ways in which Intersection Density sustainability Tools can be applied to Access to Streets, Street Density (Freeways, Thoroughfares, Streets) Support address planning issues within a variety Freeways multimodal Access to Freeways of geographic contexts. Additionally, the transportation Access to Thoroughfares initiative aims for the implementation of and increased Type of Transit strategic projects, policies and programs connectivity. High Quality Transit Type of Transit Facilities that move above and beyond the ongo- Transit Frequency and Connectivity ing, higher-level efforts of the Houston- Galveston Regional Plan for Sustainable Development. Urban Houston Framework | 5 Executive Summary Framework Synopsis This Study captures the outcomes of the This Urban Houston Framework Study is Urban Houston Framework Focus Group the first of many phases in developing a and interested public dialogues led by comprehensive set of regulatory incen- Design Workshop from October 2012 tives that the City of Houston, as well as to April 2013 in which various issues its regional partners, can use to selec- and solutions involving urban sprawl, tively encourage dense, sustainable low density, lack of pedestrian safety, neighborhoods in appropriate locations, and inequitable access to housing, while protecting the character of existing, economic and transit opportunities were stable residential communities. discussed. The Framework is intended to assist stakeholders interested in creating vibrant live/work/play environments. Stakeholder expertise consisted of real- tors, developers, policymakers, engi- Photo Credit: Design Workshop | Denver, Colorado neers, architects, landscape architects, The Framework is intended to assist stakeholders interested in creating vibrant live/ urban planners, housing interests and work/play environments. special districts. These groups were identified early in the process as the key stakeholders and were engaged in each step of the pro- cess. Phone calls, e-mail invitations and advertisements on various social media websites (such as Twitter and Facebook) were posted prior to events to encour- age participation from these audiences. City departments and policy making agencies participated, creating a strong platform for on-going dialogue regarding Urban Centers. Photo Credit: City of Houston | Buffalo Bayou This Urban Houston Framework Study is the first of many phases in developing a comprehensive set of regulatory incentives Urban Houston Framework | 6 Executive Summary Envisioning Urban Centers Stakeholders developed a single, over Large Centers have the highest hous- arching Vision for all Urban Centers: ing and job densities accompanied To create vibrant Urban Centers in with intense cultural
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of a Counseling Intervention In
    CURRICULUM VITAE Susan Parnell University of Texas Health Services 7000 Fannin, Suite 1620 Houston, TX 77030 Tel: (Office) (713) 500-3267 Education 2002- 2012 Doctoral Program Doctorate of Nursing Philosophy Texas Woman’s University 1995 – 2000 Graduate Studies Master of Science in Nursing/Master of Public Health University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center Women’s Health Nursing/ School of Nursing Occupational Health Nursing/ School of Public Health 1989 - 1991 Bachelor of Science in Nursing University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center Nursing Professional Experience 1991-1995 Harris County Health Department Staff Nurse 1991-1992 Assistant Clinic Manager 1992-1995 Nurse Educator 1995 1995-2011 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston UT Health Services Coordinator, Communicable Disease and Travel Health Programs 1995-2006 UT School of Nursing Instructor, Clinical Nursing 2000-2011 UT School of Public Health Associate Director, Occupational Health for Nurses Program 2002-2011 Director, Employee Health Services 2007-2011 Susan Parnell, RN, MSN, MPH, CIC Curriculum Vitae Professional Experience 2011-2012 Texas Children’s Hospital Assistant Director, Employee Health and Wellness 2012-present University of Texas Health School of Nursing Assistant Professor of Nursing University of Texas Health Services Director, UT Employee Health and Occupational Health Contracts Professional Committees 1993-1995 Harris County Health Department Continuous Quality Improvement Pilot Project Team Leader 1995-1998 University of Texas
    [Show full text]
  • Harrisburg Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone May 2016 Inside Cover Table of Contents
    Existing Conditions Harrisburg Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone May 2016 Inside Cover Table of Contents Introduction Housing LOCATION .......................................................... 5 HOUSING STOCK ................................................ 29 EXISTING PL ANS AND STUDIES ............................... 12 HOUSING TYpeS ................................................. 30 Land Use & Mobility AGE ................................................................ 30 EleMENTS OF THE DISTRICT ................................... 13 Crime LAND USE/PROpeRTY CL ASSIFICATION ..................... 13 Economic Indicators ROADWAYS ........................................................ 16 BUSINESS SUMMARY ............................................ 35 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................... 16 RETAIL TRADE .................................................... 38 RAILROAD ......................................................... 17 DAY TIME POPUL ATION .......................................... 40 BIKEWAYS ......................................................... 17 Planned Infrastructure Improvements RAILS TO TRAILS ................................................. 17 CAPITAL IMPROveMENTS ....................................... 45 PARKS & TRAILS ................................................. 21 RebUILD HOUSTON +5 ........................................ 45 REIMAGINE METRO ............................................. 21 Observations People OBSERVATIONS ................................................... 49
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSIT SYSTEM MAP Local Routes E
    Non-Metro Service 99 Woodlands Express operates three Park & 99 METRO System Sistema de METRO Ride lots with service to the Texas Medical W Center, Greenway Plaza and Downtown. To Kingwood P&R: (see Park & Ride information on reverse) H 255, 259 CALI DR A To Townsen P&R: HOLLOW TREE LN R Houston D 256, 257, 259 Northwest Y (see map on reverse) 86 SPRING R E Routes are color-coded based on service frequency during the midday and weekend periods: Medical F M D 91 60 Las rutas están coloradas por la frecuencia de servicio durante el mediodía y los fines de semana. Center 86 99 P&R E I H 45 M A P §¨¦ R E R D 15 minutes or better 20 or 30 minutes 60 minutes Weekday peak periods only T IA Y C L J FM 1960 V R 15 minutes o mejor 20 o 30 minutos 60 minutos Solo horas pico de días laborales E A D S L 99 T L E E R Y B ELLA BLVD D SPUR 184 FM 1960 LV R D 1ST ST S Lone Star Routes with two colors have variations in frequency (e.g. 15 / 30 minutes) on different segments as shown on the System Map. T A U College L E D Peak service is approximately 2.5 hours in the morning and 3 hours in the afternoon. Exact times will vary by route. B I N N 249 E 86 99 D E R R K ") LOUETTA RD EY RD E RICHEY W A RICH E RI E N K W S R L U S Rutas con dos colores (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter-Spring 1994
    28 C i t e 3 I 1 9 9 4 The mall before the roof was added in 1966. Gulf gain, view from loop 610 oaQtfga^ The BRUCE C. W E B B C i t e 3 1 : 1 9 9 4 29 Gulf gale in ihe lot e 1950s. HI-; PROJK.T of relocating vintage center - Houston's first regional America's urban life into shopping center, located at Houston's entirely new, free-floating sub- first freeway interchange - was designed urban forms, begun after and built before the ubiquitous mall for TWorld War II, was accomplished in such mula had been fully developed and codi- short order and is now so pervasive that it fied. Gulfgate defies expectation by being is difficult to see it as a process at all. lopsidedly organized: its two anchor stores, Sakowitz (emptied out when the Particularly in a city such as Houston, 1 whose character was established along the Sakowitz chain folded in the early eight- lines of a suburban model, growth has ies) and Joske's (now Dillard's) were become synonymous with sprawl, and the located side by side at one end of the Gulfgate: view from the southeast showing entrance to underground servke tunnel an right. automobile orientation is so deeply woven center, whereas the usual plan forms the into the spatial fabric that even coherent mall into a dumbbell, with the two high- remnants of the city past, when they are volume "magnet" stores at either end of preserved at all, are splintered and frag- an inside street.
    [Show full text]
  • Rider Guide / Guía De Pasajeros
    Updated 02/10/2019 Rider Guide / Guía de Pasajeros Stations / Estaciones Stations / Estaciones Northline Transit Center/HCC Theater District Melbourne/North Lindale Central Station Capitol Lindale Park Central Station Rusk Cavalcade Convention District Moody Park EaDo/Stadium Fulton/North Central Coffee Plant/Second Ward Quitman/Near Northside Lockwood/Eastwood Burnett Transit Center/Casa De Amigos Altic/Howard Hughes UH Downtown Cesar Chavez/67th St Preston Magnolia Park Transit Center Central Station Main l Transfer to Green or Purple Rail Lines (see map) Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales Westbound – Central Station Capitol Eastbound – Central Station Rusk Eastbound Theater District to Magnolia Park Hacia el este Magnolia Park Main Street Square Bell Westbound Magnolia Park to Theater District Downtown Transit Center Hacia el oeste Theater District McGowen Ensemble/HCC Wheeler Transit Center Museum District Hermann Park/Rice U Stations / Estaciones Memorial Hermann Hospital/Houston Zoo Theater District Dryden/TMC Central Station Capitol TMC Transit Center Central Station Rusk Smith Lands Convention District Stadium Park/Astrodome EaDo/Stadium Fannin South Leeland/Third Ward Elgin/Third Ward Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales TSU/UH Athletics District Northbound Fannin South to Northline/HCC UH South/University Oaks Hacia el norte Northline/HCC MacGregor Park/Martin Luther King, Jr. Southbound Northline/HCC to Fannin South Palm Center Transit Center Hacia el sur Fannin South Destination Signs / Letreros Direccionales Eastbound Theater District to Palm Center TC Hacia el este Palm Center Transit Center Westbound Palm Center TC to Theater District Hacia el oeste Theater District The Fare/Pasaje / Local Make Your Ride on METRORail Viaje en METRORail Rápido y Fare Type Full Fare* Discounted** Transfer*** Fast and Easy Fácil Tipo de Pasaje Pasaje Completo* Descontado** Transbordo*** 1.
    [Show full text]
  • SWUTC/15/600451-00048-1 Proposing Transportation Designs
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No 3. Recipient's Catalog No SWUTC/15/600451-00048-1 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Proposing Transportation Designs and Concepts to Make Houston December 2015 METRO’s Southeast Line at the Palm Center Area more Walkable, 6. Performing Organization Code Bikeable, and Livable 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Khosro Godazi, Latissha Clark, and Vincent Hassell 600451-00048-1 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Training and Research Texas Southern University 11. Contract or Grant No. 3100 Cleburne DTRT12-G-UTC06 Houston, Texas 77004 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Southwest Region University Transportation Center Texas A&M Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 14. Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, Texas 77843-3135 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program. 16. Abstract Over the years, the Palm Center (PC) in Houston, Texas, has been the beneficiary of several economic development endeavors designed to ignite economic and community growth and revitalization. While these endeavors brought forth initial success, they have failed to transform the PC into a lasting model of economic growth and prosperity and to inspire community pride and engagement. The development of METRO’s Southeast Line light rail station at the Palm Center Transit Center presents the prime opportunity for meeting the needs of the community by implementing design concepts and principles that provide social, environmental, and economic benefits to those living within close proximity of the transit station.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National RegisterSBR of Historic Places Registration Draft Form 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Houses at 1217 and 1219 Tulane Street Other name/site number: NA Name of related multiple property listing: Historic Resources of Houston Heights MRA 2. Location Street & number: 1217 Tulane Street City or town: Houston State: Texas County: Harris Not for publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ( nomination request for determination of eligibility) meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ( meets does not meet) the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D State Historic Preservation Officer ___________________________ Signature of certifying official / Title Date Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. _______________________________________________________________________ __________________________ Signature of commenting or other official Date ____________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Zone
    TIRZ 8 Existing Conditions and Needs Analysis Overview of the Zone L TIRZ 7: O.S.T./ALMEDA BROADWAY ST OLD SPANISH TR Gulfgate Center ALLEN GENOA RD W HARRIS AVE The Reinvestment Zone Number Eight, City GRIGGS RD TIRZ 8: GULFGATE TIRZ 8: GULFGATE TIRZ 6: EASTSIDE TIRZ 8 Boundary Expansion GALVESTON RD of Houston, Texas, (“T.I.R.Z. #8,” “Gulfgate,” or YELLOWSTONE BLVD Other TIRZ LONG DR Herman A. Barnett Stadium City Limit Shopping Mall “Zone”) was created by the City Council of the Golf Course 610 PARK PLACE BLVD City of Houston, Texas on December 10, 1997, PARK PLACE BLVD ALLENDALE RD Glenbrook by Ordinance No. 97-1524 and enlarged by SCOTT ST RICHEY ST DIXIE DR HOWARD DR BROADWAY ST QUEENS RD Ordinance No. 1999-0706. It was expanded a HOLMES RD CRESTMONT ST S RICHEY ST W IN third time by Ordinance 2014-1192 on December K LER DR TELEPHONE RD 17, 2014. CULLEN BLVD HOUSTON BLVD SPENCER HWY BELLFORT ST S DRWAYSIDE JUTLAND RD The primary goals of the Zone are to: MYKAWA RD REED RD COLLEGE AVE G CITY OF HOUSTON A • eliminate blight & substandard conditions L V E S T O AIRPORT BLVD N R D • provide a way to remediate unsafe and MONROE RD OK DR EBRO Hobby Airport G ED unsanitary conditions 45 • SOUTH ACRES DR encourage the sound growth of the MARTINDALE RD residential, retail, and commercial sectors T SCOTT ST S R E AV D SH through: CLEARWOOD DR ALMEDA GENOA R S OREM RD E RDVILLE RD ALMEDA GENOA RD Almeda Mall the purchase, demolition and SCOTT ST OREM DR OREM DR WILLA reconstruction of property, ALMEDA GENOA RD Aerial Imagery, USDA NAIP 2014 ALLISON RD City Park Boundary, 2013 0 0.5 Miles Hawes Hill Calderon | www.hhcllp.com Aerial View, 2006 8/31/2015 INGSPOINT RD design and construction of improved K mobility systems, streetscape enhancements, The zone is located in southeast Houston The TIRZ is located in Council Districts D & I and pedestrian amenities, adjacent to Hobby Airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital CHNA 2019
    HEALTH INSURANCE MEMORIAL HERMANN SOUTHEAST HOSPITAL 2019 Community Health Needs Assessment Board Approved June 27, 2019 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 4 Introduction & Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Findings ................................................................................................................................... 4 Prioritized Areas .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ................................................................................................. 6 Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital ...................................................................................................... 6 Vision ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Mission Statement ................................................................................................................................... 6 Memorial Hermann Health System ......................................................................................................... 6 Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital Service Area .............................................................................. 7 Consultants
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data
    Texas Hospital Inpatient Discharge Data Public Use Data File Reporting Status of Texas Hospitals, 2015 Reports With With With With 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 With Comment Comment Comment Comment Abilene 091001 Abilene Regional Medical Center x x x x 500000 Hendrick Medical Center x x x xOC 846000 Abilene Behavioral Health x x x x 920000 Healthsouth Rehab Hospital Abilene x x x x 973240 Oceans Behavioral Hospital Abilene xOC x x xOC 973590 ContinueCare Hospital at Hendrick Medical x xlv xlv xlv Center Addison 750000 Methodist Hospital for Surgery x x x x Alice 689401 CHRISTUS Spohn Hospital Alice x x x x Allen 724200 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Allen x x x x x x x x 973130 Warm Springs Rehab Hospital Allen x x x x Alpine 711900 Big Bend Regional Medical Center x x xOC xOC Amarillo 001000 Baptist St Anthonys Hospital x x x x x x x 318000 Northwest Texas Hospital x x x x 318001 The Pavilion 318000 714000 Northwest Texas Surgery Center xlv xlv xlv xlv 796000 Plum Creek Specialty Hospital x xlv xlv xlv x 852900 Physicians Surgical Hospital-Quail Creek x x x x 852901 Physicians Surgical Hospital-Panhandle x x x x Campus 973340 Vibra Hospital of Amarillo x x x x 973350 Vibra Rehabilitation Hospital Amarillo x x x x Anahuac 442000 Bayside Community Hospital xlv xlv xlv xlv Andrews 187000 Permian Regional Medical Center x x x x x Angleton 126000 Angleton Danbury Medical Center x x x x Anson 016000 Anson General Hospital x x x x x Aransas Pass 239001 Care Regional Medical Center x x x x Arlington 100084 Sundance Hospital x x x x 422000 Texas Health
    [Show full text]
  • New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects
    CENTRAL HOUSTON | New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects ID PROPERTY UNITS 1 Camden Downtown I 271 2 Broadstone Summer Street 375 3 Lincoln Heights 292 4 St Andrie 232 31 5 Broadstone Heights Waterworks 309 6 Parker, The 264 7 Broadstone Sawyer Yards 327 32 33 8 15th Street Flats 337 53 54 9 Alexan Lower Heights 375 3 29 5 10 Standard In The Heights, The 301 27 11 Reverie At River Hollow 304 12 Hanover River Oaks 370 8 13 Crimson 295 14 South Main Building 186 15 Orleans At Fannin Station 338 16 Alta Med Main 338 17 Drewery Place 357 52 18 Travis, The 328 10 55 26 19 Residences At La Colombe d'Or 265 24 57 20 2111 Austin 215 2 21 Regalia At The Ballpark 229 9 7 30 22 Preston, The (High Rise) 373 28 4 56 34 23 Navigation Blvd Site 293 35 24 Alta Washington Avenue 204 25 25 Alexan Memorial 356 6 22 21 26 Crest at Taylor 381 46 23 27 Ellison Heights (High Rise) 152 11 43 73 49 28 Westcott, The (High Rise) 315 41 51 39 72 1 29 Foundry On 19th 289 42 48 30 Vic At Interpose (Micro Units) 168 60 70 50 68 66 20 31 1001 West 34th Site 392 47 75 32 Slate Heights 281 13 36 17 69 71 33 Domain Heights 408 58 19 12 18 34 Elan Sawyer Yards 334 37 38 59 65 35 Modera Washington 341 61 36 Novel River Oaks 330 37 Alexan River Oaks 383 62 44 38 Alta West Alabama 304 39 Briar Hollow (High Rise) 200 67 45 40 Fountains, The 326 41 Montrose At Buffalo Bayou 224 63 42 Driscoll At River Oaks, The 318 43 Alta River Oaks 364 44 Chelsea Museum District(Hi-Rise) 325 45 Boone Manor (High Rise) 370 46 Regent Square 600 47 Avondale Highline 100 48 1810 Main
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Attainability Analysis of Buffalo/White Oak Bayou
    PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A RECREATIONAL USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE BUFFALO BAYOU/WHITE OAK BAYOU STREAM SYSTEM IN HOUSTON, TEXAS BY Dr. Kirk Winemiller Dr. David Scott Dr. Scott Shafer John Baker Bibiana Correa Po-Hsin Lai TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Historic Information 7 Description of the Study Area 13 Methods 14 Results 19 Summary 40 Recommendations 43 References 44 Appendix 1: On-Site Observations of Recreation Uses along Buffalo Bayou 46 Appendix 2: Environmental Assessment Methodology Definitions 53 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Description of surveyed streams in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Measurements were conducted during the summer of 2008. Stream type represents the dominant condition in the stream. Table 2. Stream Flow measurements in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Measurements were conducted during the summer of 2008 on eleven cross sections. Table 3. Maximum depth and mean of physicochemical water characteristics of Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Values are presented from upstream to down stream and were calculated from measurements conducted during the summer of 2008, excluding obvious outliers. Abbreviations: VMD = Secchi disk was still visible at maximum depth. Table 4. Location, general surroundings, and point sources present at 85 sampled stations in the Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Table 5. Stream channel and corridor assessment per sampled station in the Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Table 6. Human activity registered in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System during the summer of 2008.
    [Show full text]