A New Business Model Strategy to Improve Shared Mobility Services

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A New Business Model Strategy to Improve Shared Mobility Services DEGREE PROJECT IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018 A new business model strategy to improve shared mobility services A Case Study on Sweden ZINEB ANEFLOUSS KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT A new business model strategy to improve shared mobility services A case study on Sweden Zineb Aneflouss Master of Science Thesis TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:639 KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Machine Design SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM En ny affärsmodellstrategi för att förbättra delade rörlighetstjänster En fallstudie på Sverige Zineb Aneflouss Master of Science Thesis TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:639 KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Machine Design SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Master of Science Thesis TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:639 A new business model strategy to improve shared mobility services A case study on Sweden Zineb Aneflouss Approved Examiner Supervisor 2018-08-29 Sofia Ritzen Anna Pernstal Brenden Commissioner Contact person RISE Eilert Johansson Abstract It is widely recognized that the world’s over-reliance on transportation contributes to many environmental problems, especially in urban areas. Sustainable mobility is a solution and an important dimension of a Smart City. Shared mobility services are part of sustainable mobility and they are widening its portfolio especially in the past decade. However, the number of users is still low compared to its high potential, and innovative solutions can only succeed with the combination of increasing the awareness of citizens, incentivizing them, and promoting their behavioural change. This paper is dedicated to the shared mobility business models as part of the collaborative consumption, and finding out the challenges and opportunities of this emerging market in a Swedish context and comparing it to a Moroccan one. The goal is to explore the key features of the main market players and the possible ways of improvements that could possibly take carpooling and car-sharing to a next level. It explores the high potential of gamification and other mechanisms to incentivize voluntary behavioural changes towards shared mobility solutions. In a first place the theoretical part provide an overview of the shared mobility in general with its different aspects highlighting the role of new technologies and internet in the development of this concept. An online survey aimed at testing the knowledge of the respondents on the concept, discover which elements affect their involvement and find out how things can be improved by analysing the feedbacks. Key words: Shared mobility, Carpooling, Car-sharing, Shared mobility services, features, Business model. Examensarbete TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:639 En ny affärsmodellstrategi för att förbättra delade rörlighetstjänster En fallstudie på Sverige Zineb Aneflouss Godkänt Examinator Handledare 2018-08-29 Sofia Ritzen Anna Pernstal Brenden Uppdragsgivare Kontaktperson RISE Eilert Johansson Sammanfattning Det är allmänt känt att världens beroenden av transporter bidrar till många miljöproblem, särskilt i stadsområden. Hållbar mobilitet är en lösning och en viktig dimension i en smart stad. Delade mobilitetstjänster är en del av hållbar mobilitet och dess portfölj har utökats särskilt under det senaste decenniet. Antalet användare är dock fortfarande lågt jämfört med den höga potentialen och innovativa lösningar kan bara lyckas med kombinationen av att öka medvetenheten om medborgarna, stimulera dem och främja deras beteendeförändringar. Denna rapport är inriktat på affärsmodellerna för delad mobilitet som en del av konsumtion genom samarbete och identifierar utmaningarna och möjligheterna på den nya marknaden i ett svenskt sammanhang och jämför det med en marockansk. Målet är att utforska huvudaktörerna hos de viktigaste marknadsaktörerna och möjliga sätt för förbättringar som möjligen kan ta bilpoolning och bildelning till nästa nivå. Potentialen inom gamification och andra mekanismer för att stimulera frivilliga beteendemässiga förändringar mot gemensamma mobila lösningar undersöks. Inledningsvis ger den teoretiska delen en översikt över den delade mobiliteten i allmänhet med sina olika aspekter som framhäver rollen som ny teknik och internet vid utvecklingen av detta koncept. Genom en online-undersökning som syftar till att testa kunskapen om konceptet hos de svarande, har faktorer som påverkar deras engagemang och hur saker kan förbättras identifierats. Nyckelord: Delad mobilitet, bilpoolning, bildelning, Delad mobilitetstjänster, Funktioner, Affärsmodell. Acknowledgements The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the help and contribution of many people. I would like to thank Mr. Eilert Johansson from RISE Stockholm and Ms Anna Pernstal Brenden from the research center Integrated Transport Research Lab (ITRL) at KTH for their precious time, supervision and encouragement to make this journey a rewarding one. It has been very interesting to discover all the work being done in the area of smart mobility and the research progress that made me realize that it is field where there still a lot to be done. I would also like to thank my family and friends for all the love and support. Zineb Aneflouss Stockholm, 08-2018 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Sammanfattning ......................................................................................................................... 9 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 11 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 I.1. Problem Statement: .......................................................................................................... 1 I.2. Project description and methodology: .............................................................................. 2 I.3. Research questions and Hypothesis: ................................................................................ 3 I.4. Scope and limitations: ...................................................................................................... 3 II. Shared mobility literature review: ......................................................................................... 5 II.1. PESTLE analysis: ........................................................................................................... 5 Political factors: .................................................................................................................. 5 Economical factors: ............................................................................................................ 5 Social factors: ...................................................................................................................... 7 Technological factors: ......................................................................................................... 9 Legal factors: .................................................................................................................... 11 Environmental factors: ...................................................................................................... 11 II.2. Car-sharing Industry overview: .................................................................................... 13 II.2.1. Business models: .................................................................................................... 13 II.2.2. Car-sharing around the world: ................................................................................ 15 II.2.3. User perspective: .................................................................................................... 17 II.2.4. Technologies: ......................................................................................................... 18 II.2.5. SWOT: ................................................................................................................... 18 II.3. Carpooling Industry overview: ..................................................................................... 21 II.3.1. User perspective: .................................................................................................... 22 II.3.3. SWOT: ................................................................................................................... 22 III. Market Analysis: ................................................................................................................ 27 III.1. Car-sharing market players: ......................................................................................... 27 III.1.1. B2C Car-sharing Major Market Players analysis: ................................................ 28 III.1.2. P2P Car-sharing Major Market Players analysis: ................................................. 28 III.1.3. Key Features: ........................................................................................................ 30 III.2. Carpooling market players: ......................................................................................... 31 III.2. 1. Major Market Players analysis: ........................................................................... 31 III.2. 2. Key Features: ....................................................................................................... 32 IV. Survey: ..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Business Platforms for Autonomous Vehicles Within Urban Mobility
    Urban Transport XXV 175 BUSINESS PLATFORMS FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES WITHIN URBAN MOBILITY FABIO ANTONIALLI1,2,3, RODRIGO MARÇAL GANDIA1,2,3, JOEL YUTAKA SUGANO2,3, ISABELLE NICOLAÏ1 & ARTHUR DE MIRANDA NETO3 1Laboratorie Génie Industriel (LGI), CentraleSupélec, France 2Post-Graduate Program in Administration (PPGA), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brazil 3Terrestrial Mobility Laboratory (LMT), Universidade Federal de Lavras, Brazil ABSTRACT With mobility becoming a key factor affecting citizens’ well-being and quality of life, innovative schemes such as peer-to-peer (P2P) ride-hailing and Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) could have significant impacts on the urban commute. Furthermore, the insertion of autonomous vehicles (AVs) promises a positive impact on cities’ transit worldwide. Ergo, companies are now combining bundles of products and services emphasizing their “sales of use” rather than of products: such integration may be realized by having multi-sided business platforms. The purpose of this study is to create future scenarios for AV business platforms within urban mobility contexts. Based on an exploratory descriptive qualitative research design, we collected data on academic and grey literature. Four scenarios were plotted with real-world examples currently present in urban mobility cases, extrapolated to a future reality where AVs are considered a transport mode: (A) business-to-consumer (B2C) autonomous ridesharing; (B) P2P autonomous ridesharing; (C) B2C multimodal mobility; (D) B2C + P2P multimodal mobility. Scenarios A and B entail unimodal mobility via autonomous ridesharing, whereupon in the former, a single firm owns a fleet and subsidizes the consumer segment, while in the latter, ordinary peers own the AVs, which are offered to other peers via Uber-like applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Avis Budget Group Budget Dollar Dtg / Dtag Ean Ehi
    Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com This list is divided into two sections; by company and state. The “company” list includes HQ information. The “state” list only includes field security contacts. Unless otherwise noted, all contacts are for corporate locations only but they should be able to provide contact information for licensee / franchise locations, if applicable. Most agencies have a “controlled” fleet meaning that vehicles seen locally with out of state plates are likely on rent locally. Revised – 09/24/19 Visit www.carrentalsecurity.com for the most current contact list. Please visit www.truckrentalsecurity.com for truck rental/leasing company contacts. Please see footer for additional information. SECURITY CONTACTS – Company ABG ALAMO AVIS AVIS BUDGET GROUP BUDGET DOLLAR DTG / DTAG EAN EHI ENTERPRISE FIREFLY HERTZ NATIONAL PAYLESS PV HOLDING RENTAL CAR FINANCE TCL Funding Ltd Partner THRIFTY ZIPCAR OTHER CAR RENTAL AGENCIES TRUCK RENTALS SECURITY CONTACTS – State AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY CANADA DISCLAIMER – This list is for the exclusive use of Car Rental Security and Law Enforcement. This list IS NOT to be used for solicitation purposes. Every effort has been made to provide accurate and current information. Errors, additions/deletions should be sent to [email protected]. All rights reserved. Copyright 2019 Page 1 Car Rental Security Contacts www.carrentalsecurity.com
    [Show full text]
  • Carsharing 2025 – Nische Oder Mainstream?
    CarSharing 2025 – nische oder MainStreaM? Sebastian Riegler, Maria Juschten, Reinhard Hössinger, Regine Gerike, Lars Rößger Bernhard Schlag, Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler, Johanna Kopp Mit diesem Bericht werden die Ergebnisse einer Grundlagenstudie zu neuen Nutzungskonzepten für individuelle Mobilität zusammengefasst. Das Projekt wurde beauftragt durch das Institut für Mobilitätsforschung (ifmo) und durchgeführt vom Institut für Verkehrswesen der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, dem Lehrstuhl für Verkehrspsychologie der Technischen Universität Dresden und der INOVAPLAN GmbH. Die Studienautoren danken allen Carsharing-Anbietern, die die Studie unterstützt und sie dadurch erst ermöglicht haben. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Institut für Verkehrswesen: Sebastian Riegler, Maria Juschten, Dr. Reinhard Hössinger, Prof. Regine Gerike Technische Universität Dresden, Lehrstuhl für Verkehrspsychologie: Lars Rößger, Prof. Bernhard Schlag INOVAPLAN GmbH: Dr. Wilko Manz, Christoph Rentschler Design: Bernhard Moosbauer, www.exsample.org © 2016 ifmo 4 CARShARing 2025 – nischE oDER MAinstream? 5 Inhalt Vorwort 6 Kapitel 4 Ist Carsharing für meine Wege geeignet? 71 Danksagung 7 a. Wofür wird Carsharing genutzt? 72 Executive Summary 8 Planung der Buchungen: Spontanität vs. Vorausdenker 72 Beginnzeiten der Fahrten: After-Work vs. Afternoon Tea 73 Kapitel 1 Einleitung 11 Fahrtweiten: Nahverkehr vs. Langstrecke 74 a. Grundlagen des Teilens und Nutzens 12 Start & Ziel der Fahrten: Innerstädtisch vs. Fahrten ins Grüne 76 Teilen, Nutzen, Besitz, Eigentum – Begriffsklärung 12 Fahrtzwecke: Freizeit & nach Hause vs. Einkauf & Ausflug 77 Welche Motive bedienen Eigentum und eigentumslose Nutzung? 14 Alternative zu Carsharing: zu Fuß und eigener Pkw vs. Erweiterung der Mobilität 78 b. Was unterscheidet Carsharing von anderen Formen der Pkw-Nutzung? 17 Verzicht auf Carsharing: Parkplatzproblematik vs. Umweltgedanke 80 c. Die Forschungsfrage: Was wollen wir erreichen? 19 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget Truck Rental Invoice
    Budget Truck Rental Invoice Continued and formal Burton always desilverizing alphamerically and catheterising his degeneration. Transcriptional Kermie hilts or deplaning some manganates puritanically, however unannotated Madison pursues provincially or portion. Unpopular and polychromatic Quintin upload her durra bunch while Shepherd monograph some blackballs delectably. We do i have a liner or you return date of chicago to truck rental company primarily provide to Emirates flight search helps you again best priced flight tickets for your road trip. The budget truck rental moving truck stop at that day? The largest airports such a local restrictions, avis budget truck rental invoice now this. We just drive your rental moving truck anywhere on the United States. Ensure that vehicle based outside our budget truck rental invoice price, invoice price of complaints so we will help? The invoice template invoice template fnma verification service by avis budget truck rental needs met all budget truck rental invoice. Unlimited Miles on ALL Standard Models Sixt rent out car. When you are responsible. Book a quick video will be given a budget truck rental invoice price. Penske guarantees your reservation, net data the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Mattress Online have created a series is handy infographics to show exactly how often you how clean and wash a variety of household items. Truck Rental Invoice Template Find free Receipt Enterprise Truck Rental Dump Truck Rental Invoice Template Invoice Maker Moving Truck Rentals Budget. Get e-Receipt Budget Australia. With any said deed the final invoice is a sizable percentage of ten total budget and onward the. Florida rental option pricing models available as possible rate may be fully funded through a truck rental moving, europcar has found in any intermediate or loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Toronto Urban Sharing Team
    URBAN SHARING City report no 2 in TORONTO URBAN SHARING TEAM URBAN SHARING IN TORONTO City report no. 2 URBAN SHARING TEAM: Oksana Mont, Andrius Plepys, Yuliya Voytenko Palgan, Jagdeep Singh, Matthias Lehner, Steven Curtis, Lucie Zvolska, and Ana Maria Arbelaez Velez 2020 Cover design: Lucie Zvolska Cover photo: Oksana Mont Copyright: URBAN SHARING TEAM ISBN: 978-91-87357-62-6. Print Urban Sharing in Toronto, City report no.2 ISBN: 978-91-87357-63-3. Pdf Urban Sharing in Toronto, City report no. 2 Printed in Sweden by E-print, Stockholm 2020 Table of contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 2 THE CITY CONTEXT ................................................................................. 5 2.1 Geography and demographics ................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Topography and urban sprawl .................................................. 5 2.1.2 Socio-demographics.................................................................. 6 2.1.3 Tourism ..................................................................................... 6 2.2 City governance ....................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Governance structure ................................................................ 6 2.2.2 City regulatory policies for sharing ............................................ 8 2.3 Economy ................................................................................................ 11 2.3.1
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Aspects of Electric Vehicles from Car-Sharing Systems
    energies Article Operational Aspects of Electric Vehicles from Car-Sharing Systems Katarzyna Turo´n 1,* , Andrzej Kubik 2 and Feng Chen 3 1 Department of Automotive Vehicle Construction, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasi´nskiegoStreet, 40-019 Katowice, Poland 2 Department of Automotive Vehicle Maintenance, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 8 Krasi´nskiegoStreet, 40-019 Katowice, Poland; [email protected] 3 School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai JiaoTong University, No. 800 Dongchuan Road Minhang Campus, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 200240 Shanghai, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 2 December 2019; Published: 4 December 2019 Abstract: The article was dedicated to the topic of energy consumption of driving cars equipped with an electric motor. Due to the emerging demands for the excessive use of energy by vehicles (including car-sharing system vehicles), the authors carried out research to determine factors that affect the energy consumption. Due to the occurrence of a research gap related to the lack of reliable scientific information regarding real electricity consumption by vehicles used in car-sharing systems, the authors attempted to determine these values based on the proposed research experiment. The purpose of the research was to identify factors that increase energy consumption while driving in the case of car-sharing systems and developing recommendations for users of car-sharing systems and system operators in relation to energy consumption. Based on data received from car-sharing system operators and to their demands that users move cars uneconomically and use too much energy, the authors performed a scientific experiment based on Hartley’s plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine Foreword
    Edition 3 | September 2018 The Magazine Foreword “Let him that would move the world first move himself.” Socrates Everything around us is in motion – including Dear customers, partners and colleagues us as humans and us as a company. And that’s a good thing. If you don’t move, you will make Everything is in motion. Everything in our universe is on the more than what we all associate with the term at first glance. no progress nor make any difference. move and, of course, so are we. And we are moving things, That’s why we are shining a spotlight on the topic from too. For example, machines, vehicles, data or knowledge – different angles and not only from HELLER’s perspective. The main topic of this third issue of HELLER sometimes even our own limits by pushing them further. the Magazine is mobility. I hope you will enjoy reading and browsing through this issue Movement is more than going from ‘A to B’ or touching your and look forward to receiving any feedback you may have. Getting from A to B, being ‘mobile’, but also toes with the tips of your fingers. We have collected the exchange, flexibility, change and being ready stories behind all this and much more in relation to mobility for it – mobility has many different facets. as the key topic of our times. But read for yourself! As a global company, we cannot deny this megatrend. There- fore, we have made mobility the focus of the third issue of Klaus Winkler HELLER the Magazine. We want to show you that mobility is CEO HELLER Group HELLER the Magazine 3_ Content Production 60_ Productive
    [Show full text]
  • L'écho-Mobile
    L’écho -mobile COMMUNAUTo’s newsletter · APRIL 2011 · VOL. XVII, NO 1 Communatuo’s first incursion in an out-of-province market (page 6 ) In this issue/ And more/ Editorial (page 2 ) CarShare HFX Halifax (page 6 ) The Competition Is Not What It Seems Communauto becomes a shareholder Improved agreements (page 4 ) BIXI-AUTO and BIXI-AUTO-BUS (page 6 ) The network reservation is better than ever The DUO and the TRIO are exclusively back for this summer Long distance rates (page 4 ) Caisse d’économie solidaire (page 3 ) Easier access and other improvements A $500 loan to switch to a member subscription and more / > EDITORIAL The Competition Is Not What It Seems Daimler’s car2go, BMW’s premium carsharing Edinburgh, Scotland (a more motivated local service, the upcoming Volkswagen project in firm saved the project at the last minute.) In Hanover and Renault-Nissan’s New Mobility 2008, Honda withdrew from the Singapore Concept, are radically changing the car market after six years, its efforts deemed industry. unsuccessful, despite praise from the critics and the community’s disappointment (And The arrival of the automobile industry’s major yet how difficult would it be for such a large players on the “mobility-on-demand” market company to manage a fleet of just under 100 will hopefully accelerate the concept’s large- vehicles?). scale development over the next few years. Benoît Robert It is sometimes disconcerting that, para- Chief Executive Officer It may seem surprising at first that manu- doxically, companies with the most resources Communauto facturers are investing in the carsharing lack perseverance when it comes to industry, given that it helps reduce household innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Performing Ambiguity?: Following Multiplicity in Shared Mobility Markets
    PERFORMING AMBIGUITY? How do markets change and develop over time? The present PhD project fo- Gianluca Chimenti cuses on the dynamic effects of market change in the context of the sharing economy. This phenomenon is of particular interest since it concerns how alter- native market forms – such as gifting, collaborating, accessing – are challeng- ing established market conceptions. Empirically, the project addresses emerg- ing shared mobility platforms (ride sharing, car sharing, etc.) and follows their PERFORMING AMBIGUITY? attempts to reconfigure extant market orders within the Swedish transportation sector. By turning the infamous conceptual confusion that surrounds the sharing FOLLOWING MULTIPLICITY IN SHARED MOBILITY MARKETS economy into a topic in its own right, the individual studies address a number of issues related to the formation and change of markets in ambiguous environ- ments. This includes, but is not limited to, the examination of conceptual contro- versies concerning what “the sharing economy” is, the changing roles of public actors, and issue of overlapping spaces during processes of marketisation. Using an Actor Network Theory approach across a number of empirical sites in Sweden and Ireland, this dissertation highlights the productive role of ambi- guity in processes of market formation and change. The four articles compris- ing this thesis explore how ambiguity can be seized by a multitude of actors all wishing to shape markets in their own interests, potentially creating multiple economic consequences and material realities as a result. In addition, it il- Chimenti Gianluca lustrates how individual shared mobility markets exhibit clear systemic proper- ties within and beyond the larger mobility realm; they depend significantly on enacted interrelations to other markets (e.g., for digital locks, batteries, tele- communication) and rely on broader, popular socio-economic trends, such as Sharing Cities and Smart Cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Course in Public Transport. the Car As a Component
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Project Group on Mobility (Ed.) Working Paper Changing course in public transport: the car as a component of competitive services WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS II 02-103 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Project Group on Mobility (Ed.) (2002) : Changing course in public transport: the car as a component of competitive services, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS II 02-103, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49803 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Veröffentlichung der Abteilung “Organisation und Technikgenese“ des Forschungsschwerpunktes Technik-Arbeit-Umwelt am WZB FS II 02-103 Changing Course in Public Transport: The Car as a Component of Competitive Services Choice-Research, Report No.
    [Show full text]
  • Brighton & Hove
    Brighton & Hove R54.1 – Car Clubs Research in Brighton & Hove Brighton & Hove August 2009 (revised version March 2010) Cleaner and better transport in cities Project no. TREN/FP7TR/218940 ARCHIMEDES Project Name ARCHIMEDES (Achieving Real Change with Innovative Transport Measure Demonstrating Energy Savings) Start date of the 15/09/2008 Project Duration: 48 months Measure: No. 54: Car-Sharing Scheme Improvements in Brighton & Hove Task: 11.6.1: Car Clubs Deliverable: R54.1: Car Clubs Research in Brighton & Hove th Due date of 15 March 2009 Deliverable: Actual 16th September 2009 submission date: Revised for March 2010 Dissemination Public Level Organisation Brighton & Hove Responsible Author Luke Ede Quality Control Alan Lewis Version 0.6 Date last updated 3rd March 2010 2 / 31 Cleaner and better transport in cities Contents 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................4 1.1 BACKGROUND CIVITAS.......................................................................................................................4 1.2 BACKGROUND ARCHIMEDES.............................................................................................................5 1.3 PARTICIPANT CITIES ..............................................................................................................................5 1.3.1 Leading City Innovation Areas......................................................................................................5 2. BRIGHTON
    [Show full text]
  • Aktueller Stand Des Car-Sharing in Europa
    more options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Juni 2010 Bundesverband CarSharing e. V. Willi Loose momo Car-Sharing More options for energy efficient mobility through Car-Sharing Grant agreement No.: IEE/07/696/SI2.499387 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 I Inhaltsverzeichnis 0. Zusammenfassung 1 1. Einleitung und Übersicht 7 1.1 Das Projekt momo Car-Sharing 7 1.2 Inhalt des Berichts 9 2. Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa 11 2.1 Überblick 11 2.2 Stand des Car-Sharing in europäischen Ländern 13 2.2.1 Belgien 13 2.2.2 Dänemark 14 2.2.3 Deutschland 14 2.2.4 Finnland 15 2.2.5 Frankreich 16 2.2.6 Großbritannien 16 2.2.7 Irland 17 2.2.8 Italien 18 2.2.9 Niederlande 19 2.2.10 Österreich 19 2.2.11 Portugal 19 2.2.12 Schweden 20 2.2.13 Schweiz 20 2.2.14 Spanien 21 2.3 Vergleichende Einschätzung des Car-Sharing-Wachstums 21 3. Befragung der europäischen Car-Sharing-Anbieter 24 3.1 Methodik der Befragung 24 3.2 Rücklauf der Fragebögen 25 3.3 Ausgewählte Befragungsergebnisse 27 3.3.1 Erhebungsergebnisse zur Car-Sharing-Nutzung 27 3.3.2 Erhebungsergebnisse zu Kooperationen der Car-Sharing-Anbieter 39 3.3.3 Erhebungsergebnisse zur politischen Unterstützung 50 Aktueller Stand des Car-Sharing in Europa Endbericht D 2.4 Arbeitspaket 2 II 4.
    [Show full text]