September 20, 2018

Jeff Sedloff June Engineering Consultants 32 West Plant Street Winter Garden, FL 34787

Proj: Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida Parcel ID #U-21-28-20-ZZZ-000002-13230.0 (BTC File #100-76) Re: Environmental Assessment Report

Dear Mr. Sedloff:

During September of 2018, Bio-Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an environmental assessment and wildlife survey of the approximately 19.05-acre Folsom Subdivision Site. This site is located at the physical address of 9737 Commodore Drive, within Section 21, Township 28 South, Range 20 East; Hillsborough County, Florida (Figures 1,2 & 3). The environmental assessment included the following elements.

• Review soil types within the project boundaries • Evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities • Review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna • Review of development constraints and permitting

SOILS

According to the Soil Survey of Hillsborough County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), two (2) soil types occur within the subject property boundaries (Figure 4). These soils include the following:

Jeff Sedloff – June Engineering Consultants Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida (BTC File #100-76) Environmental Assessment Report Page 2 of 7

• Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#7) • Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#53)

Candler Fine Sand; 0 to 5 percent slopes (#7) is a nearly level to gently sloping, excessively drained upland soil mapping unit, which may include up to 18% of dissimilar soil types. Typically Candler fine sands have a surface layer of dark gray fine sand about 6 inches think. A seasonal high water table is at a depth of more than 80 inches. Permeability is rapid and available water capacity is very low. The soil is suitable for citrus crops and moderately suitable for pasture or sand pine. Associated with its permeability, the soil is known for droughtiness and leaching of soil nutrients. Consequently, soil erosion, the instability of cut banks and groundwater contamination associated with seepage are recognized management concerns.

Tavares-Millhopper complex; 0 to 5 percent slopes (#53) are nearly-level-to-gently-sloping, moderately-well drained soils found in low-lying areas of uplands and on low ridges of flatwoods. Generally, this soil unit is composed of about 63 percent Tavares soil and 26 percent Millhopper soils, although dissimilar soils may comprise up to 13 percent of these areas. Tavares soil surface is dark grayish brown fine sand to a depth of 6 inches supported by pale brown sand to a depth of about 32 inches. The surface layer of Millhopper soil is about 4 inches of dark gray fine sand over subsurface layers of brown fine sand to a depth of 9 inches and light yellowish brown fine sand to about 25 inches. Tavares soil has a seasonal high water table at a depth of 40 to 80 inches for more than 6 months, which recedes to a depth below 80 inches during extended dry periods. Millhopper soil has a seasonal high water table at a depth of 40 to 60 inches for 1 to 4 months per year, which recedes to 60 to 72 inches for 2 to 4 months. Tavares soils have rapid permeability while Millhopper soil permeability is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil. Available water capacity is very low and low for Tavares and Millhopper soils, respectively. The common land uses on these soils include pasture, home sites and urban development, although some areas have developed cultivated crops and citrus on these soils. The main management concerns associated with this mapping unit include droughtiness, leaching of soil nutrients, instability of cut banks and the potential for groundwater contamination.

The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) does not consider main components or inclusions from soil types associated with the subject site to be hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Fourth Edition (March 2007).

Jeff Sedloff – June Engineering Consultants Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida (BTC File #100-76) Environmental Assessment Report Page 3 of 7

LAND USE TYPES/VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES

The Folsom Subdivision Site currently supports two (2) land use types/vegetative communities within the subject property boundaries (Figure 5). These land use types/vegetative communities were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 2004). The upland land use types/vegetative communities within the subject property consists of Low Density Residential (110) and Improved Pasture (211). There are no wetlands/surface waters within the subject property boundaries. The following provides a brief description of the land use types/vegetative communities identified within the Folsom Subdivision Site.

Uplands:

110 Residential, Low Density (approx. 0.65 acres)

In the southern-central portion of the site, is a mobile home residence that is best classified as Residential, Low Density (110), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species identified within this area consists of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), live oak (Quercus virginiana), and muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia).

211 Improved Pastures (approx. 18.40 acres)

The majority of the property is active and maintained pasturelands and this area is best classified as Improved Pastures (211), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species identified within this area consists of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), live oak (Quercus virginiana), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), water oak (Quercus nigra), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), camphortree (Cinnamomum camphora), guineagrass (Megathyrsus maximus), lantana (Lantana spp.), rattlebox (Crotalaria spp.), American pokeweed (Phytolacca decandra), yellow thistle (Cirsium horridulum), caesarweed (Urena lobata), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbriar (Smilax spp.), passionflower (Passiflora coccinea), beggar ticks (Bidens alba), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), climbing hempvine (Mikania scandens), balsam apple (Momordica balsamina), tropical soda apple (Solanum viarum), and dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium).

Wetlands/Surface Waters:

There were no wetland or surface water land use types/vegetative communities identified within the Folsom Subdivision Site property boundaries.

Jeff Sedloff – June Engineering Consultants Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida (BTC File #100-76) Environmental Assessment Report Page 4 of 7

WILDLIFE AND PROTECTED SPECIES

Using methodologies outlined in the Florida’s Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission’s (FFWCC’s) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (April 2008 - revised May 2017); an assessment for “listed” floral and faunal species was conducted at the site. This assessment included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are “listed” by the FFWCC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (May 2017) that have the potential to occur in Some County (see Table 1). The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the site:

Reptiles and Amphibians green anole (Anolis carolinensis) Cuban brown anole (Anolis sagrei)

Birds Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) Northern Mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Red-shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus)

Mammals eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus)

None of the above identified species are listed in the FFWCC’s Official Lists - Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (May 2017). The following provides a brief description of particular wildlife species as they relate to the development of the site.

Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940)

In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FFWCC’s imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FFWCC’s Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A-16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus).

Jeff Sedloff – June Engineering Consultants Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida (BTC File #100-76) Environmental Assessment Report Page 5 of 7

In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. Under FFWCC’s new management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. A FFWCC Eagle permit is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the 660-foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest during the nesting season, October 1 through May 15 or when eagles are present at the nest.

In addition to the preliminary on-site review for “listed” species, BTC conducted a review for any FFWCC recorded Bald Eagle nests on or in the vicinity of the subject property (see attached). This review revealed no recorded Bald Eagle nests site within one (1.0) mile of the subject property.

Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) State & Ferderally listed as “Threatened”

It should also be noted that the site is shown to be located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area. The Wood Stork (Mycteria Americana) is listed as “Endangered” by both the FFWCC and the USFWS. Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. Their plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely unfeathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Wood Storks are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. They feed in freshwater marshes, narrow tidal creeks, or flooded tidal pools as well as roadside ditches. Particularly attractive feeding sites are depressions in marshes or swamps where fish become concentrated during periods of falling water levels.

Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the site or within close proximity. The USFWS and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers require that any impacts to on-site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a portion of the Wood Stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through the purchase of mitigation credits or recreated elsewhere on-site so that there would be no net loss of Wood Stork foraging habitat. However, since there are no wetland/surface water areas within the site, it is not anticipated that any further action will be required pertaining to Wood Storks.

Jeff Sedloff – June Engineering Consultants Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida (BTC File #100-76) Environmental Assessment Report Page 6 of 7

USFWS CONSULTATION AREAS

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have established “consultation areas” for certain listed species. Generally, these consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually associated with permitting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The reader should be aware that species presence and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the final determination.

Consultation areas are typically regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the species in question is known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed species to occur and that additional review might be necessary to confirm or rule-out the presence of the species. The additional review typically includes the application of species- specific criteria to rule-out or confirm the presence of the species in question. Such criteria might consist of a simple review for critical habitat types. In other cases, the review might include the need for species-specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS.

The Folsom Subdivision Site is located within one (1) USFWS Consultation Area which is the Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens). The following provides a brief description of the respective species, its habitat and the potential for additional review:

Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) Federally Listed as “Threatened” by USFWS

The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Florida Scrub-Jay. Currently the Florida Scrub-Jay is listed as “Threatened” by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are largely restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak, scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a, Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands. Optimal Scrub- Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks from 1 to 3 m (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50 to 90 % the area; bare ground or sparse vegetation less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10 to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than 20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991).

No Scrub-Jays were observed on the subject site during the survey conducted by BTC. No suitable habitat for the Florida Scrub Jay is present within the project boundaries or the adjacent parcels. A formal survey is not anticipated to be required; however, the USFWS makes the final determination.

Jeff Sedloff – June Engineering Consultants Folsom Subdivision Site – Hillsborough County, Florida (BTC File #100-76) Environmental Assessment Report Page 7 of 7

DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS AND PERMITTING

Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission (HCEPC)

No wetlands/surface waters are located within the Folsom Subdivision Site. Hillsborough County Natural Resources will likely correspond with Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission (EPC) to confirm this assessment. This should not affect any permitting or create additional developement constraints.

Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD)

An Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) through the SWFWMD will be required for construction approval on the subject site. This will include a review and approval of the project’s proposed stormwater management system. No wetlands/surface waters are located within the Folsom Subdivision Site. SWFWMD staff will likely visit the site to confirm there are no wetlands within the project boundaries.

The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894-5969. Thank you.

Regards,

Ryan Countess Field Biologist

Dillon Reeves Project Manager

Attachments: Legend

Folsom Subdivision Site

Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community

1 Folsom Subdivision Site Miles Hillsborough County, Florida Project #: 100-76 Figure 1 ² Produced By: JDH Location Map Date: 9/14/2018 Legend

Folsom Subdivision Site (± 19.05 Ac.)

250 Folsom Subdivision Site Feet Hillsborough County, Florida Project #: 100-76 Figure 2 ² Produced By: JDH 2018 Google Earth Aerial Map Date: 9/13/2018 Legend

Folsom Subdivision Site

1,000 Folsom Subdivision Site Feet Hillsborough County, Florida Project #: 100-76 Figure 3 ² Produced By: JDH USGS Topographic Map Date: 9/13/2018 Legend Folsom Subdivision Site Hillsborough County Soils 7: Candler fine sand, 0 to 5 percent slopes

53: Tavares-Millhopper complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes

53

7

300 Folsom Subdivision Site Feet Hillsborough County, Florida Project #: 100-76 Figure 4 ² Produced By: JDH SSURGO Soils Map Date: 9/14/2018 Legend Folsom Subdivision Site FLUCFCS Symbol - FLUCFCS Name 110 - Residential Low Density

211 - Improved Pasture

211

110

200 Folsom Subdivision Site Feet Hillsborough County, Florida Project #: 100-76 Figure 5 ² Produced By: RCC FLUCFCS Map Date: 9/19/2018 Table 1: Potentially Occurring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Hillsborough County (as of March 2018)

Scientific Name Common Name Federal State Status Status REPTILES Alligator mississippiensis American Alligator T(S/A) FT(S/A) Caretta caretta Loggerhead T FT Chelonia mydas Green Sea Turtle T FT Dermochelys coriacea Leatherback E FE Drymarchon couperi Eastern Indigo Snake T FT Gopherus polyphemus Gopher Tortoise C ST Lepidochelys kempii Kemp's Ridley E FE Pituophis melanoleucus Florida Pine Snake N ST mugitus Stilosoma extenuatum Short-tailed Snake N ST BIRDS Platalea ajaja Roseate Spoonbill N ST Antigone canadensis Florida Sandhill Crane N ST pratensis Aphelocoma coerulescens Florida Scrub-jay T FT Athene cunicularia Burrowing Owl N ST Charadrius melodus Piping Plover T FT Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron N ST Egretta rufescens Reddish Egret N ST Egretta tricolor Tricolored Heron N ST Falco sparverius paulus Southeastern American N ST Kestrel Haematopus palliatus American Oystercatcher N ST Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle MC N Mycteria americana Wood Stork T FT Pandion haliaetus Osprey N SSC* Rynchops niger Black Skimmer N ST Sternula antillarum Least Tern N LT MAMMALS Sciurus niger shermani Sherman's Fox Squirrel N SSC Trichechus manatus Manatee T FT VASCULAR PLANTS Andropogon artatus Pinewoods bluestem N LT Asplenium erosum Auricled Spleenwort N LE Bonamia grandiflora Florida Bonamia T LE Blechnum occidentale Sinkhole Fern N LE Carex chapmanii Chapman's Sedge N LT Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N LE Chrysopsis floridana Florida Goldenaster E LE Glandularia tampensis Tampa Vervain N LE Lechea cernua Nodding Pineweed N LT Nolina brittoniana Britton's Beargrass E LE Nemastylis floridana Celestial Lily N LE Ophioglossum palmatum Hand Fern N LE Pecluma plumula Plume Polypody N LE Pteroglossaspis ecristata Giant Orchid N LT Rhynchospora Large-plumed beaksedge N LE Thelyperis serrata Toothed Maiden Fern N LE Triphora amazonica Broad-leaved Nodding-caps N LE

FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS

E-Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. T-Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. E(S/A)-Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have T(S/A)-Threatened due to similarity of appearance (see above). PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered species. PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened species. C-Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support XN-Non-essential experimental population. MC-Not currently listed, but of management concern to USFWS. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened.

STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS

FE -State listing status reflects the Federal designation of this species, subspecies, or population as "Endangered" FT-State Listing status reflects the Federal designation of this species, subspecies or population as "Threatened" ST-Threatened: species, subspecies, or isolated population facing a very high risk of extinction in the future. SSC-Species of Special Concern is a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is facing a moderate risk of extinction in the future, but for which inadequate information exists to support full listing. PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened. PS-Proposed for listing as Species of Special Concern. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing.

STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS

LE-Endangered: species of plants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which LT-Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number of plants within the state, but which have not so PE-Proposed for listing as Endangered. PT-Proposed for listing as Threatened. N-Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. COUNTY OCCURRENCE STATUS

Vertebrates and Invertebrates: C = Confirmed P = Potential N = Nesting

Plants, Natural Communities, and Other: C = Confirmed R = Reported

** See Rank and Status Explanations and Definitions, Special Animal Listings - Federal and State Status  ÿ

Y`abcdeÿYcghÿeidÿpc`d`cqrÿ 678ÿ@AB 6CDEFBDGFHIFPQR7 BHSQGTHUVQFÿWGXDSXQT saigrbteucaiÿsavvcggcai

ÿ

ÿ ÿ ÿ nc’rigrgÿoÿ pc`d`cqrÿ pc`d`cqrÿoÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ Ycghci xaeuci “€iuci ™rbvcug pcrfci “eqcueug drgreb’h ”d€’eucai saigrbteucai

@ABÿrDsQÿtÿAuSTSuvQÿwÿrHCuFHF7ÿtÿxHGHyQTÿz{QIuQ7ÿtÿ|HSTÿ}HySQÿxHGHyQsQGFÿtÿ}HySQÿPQ7Fÿ~DIHFDU

”e`rÿrguÿna’euab

AQSIDsQÿFDÿF€Qÿ@SDUuTHÿ@u7€ÿHGTÿAuSTSuvQÿBDG7QUXHFuDGÿBDssu77uDGÿ|HSTÿ}HySQÿPQ7Fÿ~DIHFDUÿ‚€Qÿ7QHUI€ÿvQHFEUQ7ÿCQSDRÿsHƒÿCQ E7QTÿFDÿSDIHFQÿ@ABÿTDIEsQGFQTÿCHSTÿQHySQÿGQ7FuGyÿFQUUuFDUuQ7ÿHGTÿFDÿXuQRÿF€QuUÿSDIHFuDG7ÿuGÿsH{ÿHGTÿ7{UQHT7€QQFÿvDUsÿ ÿ PQRÿzEUXQƒÿ„UDFDIDStÿWGÿ ††‡ÿF€Qÿ7FHFQRuTQÿCHSTÿQHySQÿGQ7FuGyÿFQUUuFDUƒÿ7EUXQƒÿ{UDFDIDSÿI€HGyQTÿrQUQÿu7ÿF€QÿsH{ÿ7€DRuGyÿR€HF IDEGFuQ7ÿHUQÿCQuGyÿ7EUXQƒQTÿ ÿTEUuGyÿF€Qÿ †ˆ‰Š †ˆ‹ÿCUQQTuGyÿ7QH7DGÿ‚€Qÿ{UDFDIDSÿI€HGyQÿUQTEIQ7ÿHGGEHSÿ7FHFQRuTQÿ7EUXQƒ QvvDUFÿHGTÿuGIUQH7Q7ÿF€QÿHsDEGFÿDvÿuGvDUsHFuDGÿyHuGQTÿvUDsÿF€QÿGQ7F7ÿF€HFÿHUQÿXu7uFQTÿTEUuGyÿF€Qÿ7EUXQƒÿ7QH7DGÿPQ7Fÿ{UDTEIFuXuFƒ u7ÿGDRÿTQFQUsuGQTÿvDUÿHÿ7ECŠ7Hs{SQÿDvÿF€QÿGQ7F7ÿF€HFÿHUQÿ7EUXQƒQTÿHGGEHSSƒÿPQ7FÿHIFuXuFƒÿHGTÿ{UDTEIFuXuFƒÿuGvDUsHFuDGÿHUQÿIUuFuIHS FDÿTQFQUsuGuGyÿuvÿF€QÿyDHS7ÿHGTÿDCŒQIFuXQ7ÿDvÿF€Qÿ|HSTÿ}HySQÿxHGHyQsQGFÿ„SHGÿHUQÿCQuGyÿsQFÿÿ ÿ 6FFQGFuDGtÿ‚€QÿuGvDUsHFuDGÿIDGFHuGQTÿRuF€uGÿF€u7ÿTHFHCH7Qÿu7ÿIEUUQGFÿF€UDEy€ÿF€Qÿ †ˆ‹Š †ˆÿGQ7FuGyÿ7QH7DGŽÿGQ7F7ÿRQUQÿ7EUXQƒQT Cƒÿ@ABÿvUDsÿPDXQsCQUÿ †ˆ‹ÿFDÿ6{UuSÿ †ˆÿ6IIEUHIƒÿDvÿF€QÿGQ7FÿSDIHFuDG7ÿu7ÿQ7FusHFQTÿFDÿCQÿRuF€uGÿ†ˆÿsuSQ7ÿDvÿF€QÿFUEQÿSDIHFuDG PDFÿHSSÿQHySQÿGQ7F7ÿuGÿ@SDUuTHÿ€HXQÿCQQGÿTDIEsQGFQTÿCƒÿ@ABÿPDGŠTDIEsQGFQTÿGQ7F7ÿUQIQuXQÿF€Qÿ7HsQÿSQXQSÿDvÿ{UDFQIFuDG7ÿH7ÿ@AB TDIEsQGFQTÿGQ7F7ÿ ÿ na’eurÿrgugÿxy

ÿ‘3! ÿ ’' %$ÿ‘3! ÿ&ÿ‘3!

rguÿle‚ —`rbu“ÿiaÿirgugÿfrbrÿqa€idÿvrruciÿuhrÿgreb’hÿ’bcurbce” –3 2ÿ

˜™šÿœ™¨™§šÿžŸ¤©ÿ ™ÿ¡ª™¢ÿ£šÿ¤§©¤©¤¥©¦§ ÿ

xe`dÿ”e`rÿrguÿ˜eueÿreb’hÿdrg€`ug •Q7ESF7ÿ{QUÿ{HyQtÿ

–3 2ÿ 4'3ÿ ÿ ÿ„HyQÿˆÿDvÿ† ÿ ™`regrÿdcbr’uÿeiyÿg€rgucaig“ÿ’avvriug“ÿabÿg€rgucaigÿeqa€uÿuhcgÿ‚erÿuaÿxe`d”e`r—lyYps”’av”ÿ‘aÿ`rebiÿvabrÿeqa€uÿre`rgÿciÿY`abcde ‚`regrÿtcgcuÿuhrÿYpsÿqe`dÿre`rÿfrqgcur”ÿ

ÿ

”v‚`ayrrÿdrga€b’rgÿe™eggfabdÿbrg€cbrdhiÿ Y`abcdeÿYcghÿeidÿpc`d`cqrÿsaigrbteucai sa‚ybchuÿƒÿ„ †‡ˆ„‰ÿueurÿaqÿY`abcdeÿ savvcggcaiÿwÿYebbcgÿxbyeiuÿx€c`dciÿ wÿ‘r’hic’e`ÿ“r`‚ÿwÿ””•–——–—˜—ÿwÿ™bcte’y hebr™aciuÿjÿ•€u`aakÿ”†lec`ÿjÿdrucbrrÿmiqa ˜cgegurbÿmiqabveucaiÿqabÿYpsÿ”v‚`ayrrg

 !"#$%&!"!'#()01 2 '!'3"453!