Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Department of Medicine University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine presents
Vulnerable Workers and Communities at Environmental Risk and Updates in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
March 13-16, 2019 San Francisco Marriott Fisherman’s Wharf San Francisco, CA
Course Chairs Paul D. Blanc, MD, MSPH Robert Kosnik, MD, DIH Samuel M. Goldman, MD, MPH University of California, San Francisco
University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine
1 2
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements pg. 4
Overview pg. 6
General Information pg. 8
Federal and State Law Regarding Cultural Linguistics pg. 9
Faculty List pg. 11
Disclosures pg. 13
Program pg. 14
Vulnerable Workers and Communities at Environmental Risk
The Vulnerable Worker – Notes from the Field pg. 17
How Medical Humanities Can Inform Our Thinking about Vulnerable Populations pg. 45
Lung Disease, Miners and Mining Communities – a Global Population at Risk pg. 53
Vulnerable Workers in New York City – Workplace Hazards and Interacting Risk Factors pg. 89
Indigenous (Native) Latin American Immigrants: Among the Most Vulnerable Workers pg. 107
An Aging Population at Work and at Play – Vocations, Avocations, and Hobbies pg. 123
Military Service as a Vulnerable Occupation: Lung Disease as a Paradigm pg. 143
Pediatric and Environmentally Exposed: Doubly Vulnerable pg. 157
Updates in Occupational and Environmental Medicine Day 1
Sports Medicine: What An Occupational Medicine Practitioner Should Consider? pg. 169
Volcanology for the Health Care Provider: Hazards of Volcanic and Geothermal Areas pg. 199
Occupational Health in the Biotechnology Industry pg. 211
Dabs, Vapes and Third‐hand Smoke: An Update on Environmental Exposure to Tobacco and Marijuana pg. 219
Climate Change and Health in 2019 pg. 225
Hazardous Metals: Emerging and Long‐Standing Toxicants pg. 235
Key Publications in Occupational & Environmental Health: the Year in Review pg. 247
Updates in Occupational and Environmental Medicine Day 2
Occupational Dermatology in 2019 – More than Just Contact Dermatitis pg. 261
The Italian Mesothelioma Registry: Lessons Learned pg. 273
Innovation in Air Quality and Climate Change Mitigation Policies: The California Paradigm pg. 289
Acknowledgement of Commercial Support
This CME activity was supported in part by educational grants from the following:
Council for Education and Research on Toxics Glenn Law Firm Gordon Rees Hobson & Bradley McGuinn Hillsman & Palefsky Moss Bollinger, LLP Patton Law, P.C. SL Environmental Law Firm S. Reed Morgan, P.C.
4 Exhibitors
Medlock Consulting Dynavax
5 University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine Presents
Vulnerable Workers and Communities at Environmental Risk and Updates in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Educational Objectives
Upon completion of this program, attendees will be able to:
Evaluate the occupational and environmental risk to selected vulnerable work groups and communities; Adopt new medical knowledge into preventive activities addressing emerging risk factors and new disease entities; Evaluate scientific data in the field of occupational and environmental medicine; Expand the differential diagnosis to incorporate a wider range of environmental and occupational factors in respiratory and other disease processes; Diagnose and treat selected occupational and environmental conditions; Improve management in terms of required regulatory management of specific work-related scenarios; Inform the prioritization of clinical care, research, and public health policy with state of the art updates.
ACCREDITATION
The University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine (UCSF) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
Physicians UCSF designates this live activity for a maximum of 17.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
This CME activity meets the requirements under California Assembly Bill 1195, Continuing Education and Cultural and Linguistic Competency.
Pain Management and End-of-Life Care: The approved credits shown above include a maximum of 2.5 credits toward meeting the requirement under California Assembly Bill 487, Pain Management and End-of-Life Care.
Geriatric Medicine: The approved credits shown above include 2.5 credits toward meeting the requirement under California Assembly Bill 1820, Geriatric Medicine.
6 California Division of Workers Compensation- Medical Unit (QME Credit) This course has been reviewed and approved for 17.25 hours of credit. The course number is 1200.
American Board of Preventive Medicine The American Board of Preventive Medicine for Maintenance of Certification (MOC) has approved this course for a maximum of 17.25 MOC credits. The course ID for this module is 1047.
American Academy of Family Physicians This Live activity, Emerging and Re-Emerging Occupational and Environmental Exposure and Disease and Updates in Occupational and Environmental Medicine, with a beginning date of 03/08/2018, has been reviewed and is acceptable for up to 17.25 prescribed credit(s) by the American Academy of Family Physicians. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
NURSES: For the purpose of recertification, the American Nurses Credentialing Center accepts AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ issued by organizations accredited by the ACCME.
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS: AAPA accepts category 1 credit from AOACCME, Prescribed credit from AAFP, and AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ from organizations accredited by the ACCME.
PHARMACY: The California Board of Pharmacy accepts as continuing professional education those courses that meet the standard of relevance to pharmacy practice and have been approved for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™.
7 General Information
Attendance Verification/Sign-In Sheet / CME Certificates Please remember to sign-in on the sign-in sheet when you check in at the UCSF Registration Desk on your first day. You only need to sign-in once for the course, when you first check in.
After the meeting, you will receive an email from [email protected] with a link to complete your online Course Evaluation/ Electronic CME Certificate. Please make sure that you add this email to your safe senders list. The Qualtrics system will send you reminders to complete your CME Certificate Claiming until you complete it.
Upon completing the Electronic CME Certificate, your CME certificate will be automatically generated to print and/or email yourself a copy. For smartphone users, you may want to take a photo of your certificate as some settings prevent you from emailing the certificate.
The link will be available for 30 days after the last day of the course. However, after that date the link will expire and you will no longer be able to claim your credits online. You must then contact the Office of CME at [email protected] to receive your certificate and a $15 administrative fee may be applied.
Speaker Survey Your opinion is important to us – we do listen! The speaker survey is the bright yellow hand-out you received when you checked in. Please complete this during the meeting and turn it in to the registration staff at the end of the course.
Security We urge caution with regard to your personal belongings and syllabus books. We are unable to replace these in the event of loss. Please do not leave any personal belongings unattended in the meeting room during lunch or breaks or overnight.
Exhibits Industry exhibits will be available outside the ballroom during breakfasts and breaks, and lunches.
Final Presentations A link to PDF versions of the final presentations will be sent via e-mail approximately 3 – 4 weeks post course. Only presentations that have been authorized for inclusion by the presenter will be included
8 Federal and State Law Regarding Linguistic Access and Services for Limited English Proficient Persons
I. Purpose. This document is intended to satisfy the requirements set forth in California Business and Professions code 2190.1. California law requires physicians to obtain training in cultural and linguistic competency as part of their continuing medical education programs. This document and the attachments are intended to provide physicians with an overview of federal and state laws regarding linguistic access and services for limited English proficient (“LEP”) persons. Other federal and state laws not reviewed below also may govern the manner in which physicians and healthcare providers render services for disabled, hearing impaired or other protected categories
II. Federal Law – Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, Executive Order 13166, August 11, 2000, and Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Regulations and LEP Guidance. The Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, and HHS regulations require recipients of federal financial assistance (“Recipients”) to take reasonable steps to ensure that LEP persons have meaningful access to federally funded programs and services. Failure to provide LEP individuals with access to federally funded programs and services may constitute national origin discrimination, which may be remedied by federal agency enforcement action. Recipients may include physicians, hospitals, universities and academic medical centers who receive grants, training, equipment, surplus property and other assistance from the federal government.
HHS recently issued revised guidance documents for Recipients to ensure that they understand their obligations to provide language assistance services to LEP persons. A copy of HHS’s summary document entitled “Guidance for Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Title VI and the Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons – Summary” is available at HHS’s website at: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/lep/ .
As noted above, Recipients generally must provide meaningful access to their programs and services for LEP persons. The rule, however, is a flexible one and HHS recognizes that “reasonable steps” may differ depending on the Recipient’s size and scope of services. HHS advised that Recipients, in designing an LEP program, should conduct an individualized assessment balancing four factors, including: (i) the number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered by the Recipient; (ii) the frequency with which LEP individuals come into contact with the Recipient’s program; (iii) the nature and importance of the program, activity or service provided by the Recipient to its beneficiaries; and (iv) the resources available to the Recipient and the costs of interpreting and translation services.
Based on the Recipient’s analysis, the Recipient should then design an LEP plan based on five recommended steps, including: (i) identifying LEP individuals who may need assistance; (ii) identifying language assistance measures; (iii) training staff; (iv) providing notice to LEP persons; and (v) monitoring and updating the LEP plan.
A Recipient’s LEP plan likely will include translating vital documents and providing either on-site interpreters or telephone interpreter services, or using shared interpreting services with other Recipients. Recipients may take other reasonable steps depending on the emergent or non- emergent needs of the LEP individual, such as hiring bilingual staff who are competent in the skills required for medical translation, hiring staff interpreters, or contracting with outside public or private agencies that provide interpreter services. HHS’s guidance provides detailed
9 examples of the mix of services that a Recipient should consider and implement. HHS’s guidance also establishes a “safe harbor” that Recipients may elect to follow when determining whether vital documents must be translated into other languages. Compliance with the safe harbor will be strong evidence that the Recipient has satisfied its written translation obligations.
In addition to reviewing HHS guidance documents, Recipients may contact HHS’s Office for Civil Rights for technical assistance in establishing a reasonable LEP plan.
III. California Law – Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual Services Act. The California legislature enacted the California’s Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual Services Act (Govt. Code 7290 et seq.) in order to ensure that California residents would appropriately receive services from public agencies regardless of the person’s English language skills. California Government Code section 7291 recites this legislative intent as follows:
“The Legislature hereby finds and declares that the effective maintenance and development of a free and democratic society depends on the right and ability of its citizens and residents to communicate with their government and the right and ability of the government to communicate with them.
The Legislature further finds and declares that substantial numbers of persons who live, work and pay taxes in this state are unable, either because they do not speak or write English at all, or because their primary language is other than English, effectively to communicate with their government. The Legislature further finds and declares that state and local agency employees frequently are unable to communicate with persons requiring their services because of this language barrier. As a consequence, substantial numbers of persons presently are being denied rights and benefits to which they would otherwise be entitled.
It is the intention of the Legislature in enacting this chapter to provide for effective communication between all levels of government in this state and the people of this state who are precluded from utilizing public services because of language barriers.”
The Act generally requires state and local public agencies to provide interpreter and written document translation services in a manner that will ensure that LEP individuals have access to important government services. Agencies may employ bilingual staff, and translate documents into additional languages representing the clientele served by the agency. Public agencies also must conduct a needs assessment survey every two years documenting the items listed in Government Code section 7299.4, and develop an implementation plan every year that documents compliance with the Act. You may access a copy of this law at the following url: http://www.spb.ca.gov/bilingual/dymallyact.htm
10 Faculty List Course Chairs
Paul D. Blanc, MD, MSPH Professor of Medicine, Endowed Chair and Division Chief, Occupational and Environmental Medicine University of California, San Francisco
Robert Kosnik, MD, DIH Professor of Medicine, Medical Director, Occupational Health Services, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Samuel M. Goldman, MD, MPH Associate Professor of Medicine and of Neurology; Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Course Faculty (University of California, San Francisco unless indicated) John Balmes, MD Professor of Medicine Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Michael N. Bates, PhD Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology Division of Environmental Health Sciences School of Public Health University of California Berkeley
Robert A. Cohen, MD, FCCP Professor of Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL
Brian Dolan, PhD Professor and Chair Department of Medical Anthropology, History, and Social Medicine
Paul English, PhD, MPH Senior Branch Science Advisor Environmental Health Investigations Branch CA Department of Public Health Richmond, CA
Mike Falvo, PhD Research Physiologist, VA NJ War Related Illness and Injury Study Center Assistant Professor Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
George Friedman-Jimenez, MD, DrPH Director, Bellevue / NYU Occupational & Environmental Medicine Clinic Assistant Professor of Population Health Medicine and Environmental Medicine Bellevue Hospital Center
Diana Gagliardi, MD Medical Researcher Head of Unit, Support to International Research Networks INAIL, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority Rome, Italy
11 Course Faculty (continued) (University of California, San Francisco unless indicated)
Robert Goodnough, MD Medical Toxicology Fellow University of California San Francisco and California Poison Control System San Francisco Division
Robert Harrison, MD, MPH Clinical Professor of Medicine Public Health Medical Officer California Department of Public Health
Stephanie Holm, MD, MPH Volunteer Clinical Professor, Division of Occupational Medicine Corresponding Medical Staff PhD Student in Epidemiology, UC Berkeley School of Public Health
Seth M. Holmes, MD, PhD Professor UC Berkeley School of Public Health
Ware Kuschner, MD Chief, Pulmonary Section, VA Palo Alto Health Care System Professor of Medicine Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University
Anthony Luke, MD, MPH Professor of Clinical Orthopedic Surgery
Howard Maibach, MD Professor of Dermatology
David Miedinger, MD, PhD Chief Occupational Health Officer F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Basel, Switzerland Acran
Salmen-Navarro, MD MSc Program Coordinator - Ergonomist Bellevue / NYU Occupational & Environmental Medicine Clinic Bellevue Hospital Center, NYU School of Medicine
Suzaynn Schick, PhD Associate Adjunct Professor, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Leoncio Vasquez Santos Director Center for Indigenous Oaxacan Development (Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo) Indigena Oaxaqueno Fresno, CA
12 Disclosures
The following individuals have disclosed they have no financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with any commercial interests who provide products or services relating to their presentation(s) in this continuing medical education activity:
John R Balmes, MD Samuel M Goldman, MD, MPH Michael N Bates, PhD Robert Thomas Goodnough, MD Paul D. Blanc, MD MSPH Robert J Harrison Robert Andrew Cohen, MD Stephanie Holm, MD, MPH Brian Dolan, PhD Seth Holmes Paul English, PhD, MPH Robert Kosnik, MD DIH Michael J Falvo, PhD Ware Kuschner, MD George Friedman-Jimenez, MD, DrPH Howard I. Maibach, MD Diana Gagliardi Suzaynn F Schick, PhD
The following individuals have disclosed having a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation during the past twelve months with a commercial interest who provides products or services relating to their presentation(s) in this continuing medical education activity. All conflicts of interest have been resolved in accordance with the ACCME Standards for Commercial Support:
Stock Shareholder (excluding mutual funds) Anthony D Luke, MD, MPH Sportzpeak Inc Holder of Intellectual Property Rights
Employee David Miedinger, MD PhD F. Hoffmann‐La Roche Ltd Stock Shareholder (excluding mutual funds)
This UCSF CME educational activity was planned and developed to: uphold academic standards to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor; adhere to requirements to protect health information under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA); and, include a mechanism to inform learners when unapproved or unlabeled uses of therapeutic products or agents are discussed or referenced.
This activity has been reviewed and approved by members of the UCSF CME Governing Board in accordance with UCSF CME accreditation policies. Office of CME staff, planners, reviewers, and all others in control of content have disclosed they have no relevant financial relationships.
13 Wednesday, March 13, 2019 6:30pm-8:30pm Evening Poster Session and Opening Reception (Napa Ballroom)
Thursday, March 14, 2019 7:00 am Registration (Golden Gate Foyer) and Continental Breakfast (St. Helena Room) Vulnerable Workers and Communities at Environmental Risk 7:45 Welcome & Overview (Golden Gate Ballroom) Course Leaders 8:00 The Vulnerable Worker: Notes from the Field Robert Harrison, MD, MPH 8:50 How Medical Humanities Can Inform Our Brian Dolan, PhD Thinking About Vulnerable Populations 9:40 Coffee Break (St. Helena Room) 10:10 Lung Disease, Miners and Mining Communities: Robert Cohen, MD a Global Population at Risk 11:00 G, P Vulnerable Workers in New York City – George Friedman-Jimenez, Workplace Hazards and Interacting Risk Factors MD, DrPH and Acran Salmen-Navarro, MD, MSc 11:50 Lunch on own 1:20 pm P Indigenous (Native) Latin American Immigrants: Seth M. Holmes, MD, PhD and Among the Most Vulnerable Workers Leoncio Vasquez Santos 2:10 G An Aging Population at Work and at Play – Ware Kuschner, MD Vocations, Avocations, and Hobbies 3:00 Coffee Break (St. Helena Room) 3:30 Military Service as a Vulnerable Occupation: Mike Falvo, PhD Lung Disease as a Paradigm 4:20 Pediatric and Environmentally Exposed: Doubly Stephanie Holm, MD, MPH Vulnerable 5:10 Closing Panel – What Experience May Teach Us Moderator: about Vulnerable Populations Robert Harrison, MD, MPH Panelists: Mike Falvo, PhD Stephanie Holm, MD, MPH Ware Kuschner, MD 6:30 pm Adjourn
Friday, March 15, 2019 7:15 am Continental Breakfast (St. Helena Room) 7:50 Welcome & Overview (Golden Gate Ballroom) Course Leaders 8:10 P Sports Medicine: What An Occupational Medicine Anthony Luke, MD, MPH Practitioner Should Consider? 9:00 Volcanology for the Health Care Provider Michael N. Bates, PhD 9:50 Coffee Break (St. Helena Room) 10:20 Occupational Health in the Biotechnology Industry David Miedinger, MD, PhD 11:30 Dabs, Vapes and Third-hand Smoke: An Update on Suzaynn Schick, PhD Environmental Exposure to Tobacco and Marijuana 12:20 pm Lunch on own 1:50 Climate Change and Health in 2019 Paul English, PhD, MPH 2:40 Hazardous Metals: Emerging and Long-Standing Robert Goodnough, MD Toxicants 3:20 Coffee Break (St. Helena Room) 3:50 OEM Published Research: The Year in Review Samuel Goldman, MD, MPH 4:45pm Adjourn 14 Saturday, March 15, 2019 7:45 am Continental Breakfast (St. Helena Room) 8:15 Welcome & Overview (Golden Gate Ballroom) Course Leaders 8:30 Occupational Dermatology in 2019 – More than Howard Maibach, MD Just Contact Dermatitis 9:30 G The Italian Mesothelioma Registry: Lessons Diana Gagliardi, MD Learned 10:20 Coffee Break (St. Helena Room) 10:40 Innovation in Air Quality and Climate Change John Balmes, MD Mitigation Policies: The California Paradigm 11:30 Closing Panel – What are the Persistent or Emerging Moderator: Problems in Occupational and Environmental Samuel Goldman, MD, Medicine? MPH Panelists: John Balmes, MD Diana Gagliardi, MD Howard Maibach, MD 12:10 Adjourn
P – Pain Credit G – Geriatric Credit
15 16 The Vulnerable Worker – Notes from the Field
Robert Harrison MD, MPH Public Health Medical Officer California Department of Public Health Clinical Professor of Medicine University of California, San Francisco
TEL: 415 885 7580 Email: [email protected]
Disclosure
I have nothing to disclose
Tony Mazzocchi 1926 - 2002
17 “Statistics are human beings with the tears wiped away”
Irving Selikoff, MD 1915-1992
Which of these most closely describes the “vulnerable (precarious” worker?” 1. Lack of access to medical treatment 2. Fear of reporting injury or illness 3. Language and/or cultural barriers 4. Contingent employment 5. Low wage 6. All of the above
3.1 million new residents in last 10 years 10 million immigrants By 2030, 1 in 5 residents will be age 65 or older
18 19 Inequality worsening
American Community Survey 2006-2010, American FactFinder. Accessed March 2014.
Wages of low-wage workers falling
“A Generation of Widening Inequality.” The California Budget Office. November 2011.
20 Historical trends in unionization and inequality
Eisenbrey, R and Gordon, C. “ As unions decline, inequality rises.” Economic Policy Institute. June 6, 2012
Union membership in last 20 years
Current Population Survey 1994-2010, Accessed March 2014.
Low-wage workforce in CA
• 89 occupations with hourly median wage less than $11.93 • Over 4 million workers • 28.4% of the CA employed workforce
21 Lowest paid occupations in CA, 2012
May 2012 State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates California. Occupational Employment Statistics. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Accessed March 2014.
What does the future hold for CA?
There will be an estimated 929,000 new low-wage jobs by 2020.
Of the new jobs created by 2020, 36.2% of them will be low-wage.
Occupation Title % Occupation Title # New Growth Jobs by by 2020 2020 Home health aides 52.4% Personal care aides 138,200 Personal care aides 42.6% Retail salespersons 103,600 Bicycle repairers 35.7% Combined food preparation 73,400 and serving Pharmacy aides 32.1% Cashiers 64,600 Nonfarm animal caretakers 31.1% Waiters and waitresses 59,600
Projections of Employment by Industry and Occupation. State of California Employment Development Department. Accessed February 2014.
Asuncion Valdivia July 28, 2004 • 53 y.o. man with dizziness, nausea, confusion after picking grapes for 10 hours in >100o heat in Kern County • Paramedics initially called but did not arrive on scene • Brought to Kern County Medical Center by son, died on arrival with body temperature > 108o
22 “Meeting in the Sun” July 28, 2005
• July 13 - Salud Rodriguez dies in bell pepper field • July 14 - Ramon Hernandez dies in melon field • July 20 - Agustine Gudino dies in tomato field • July 31 - Constantino Cruz dies in tomato field
August 3, 2005
This is a tragedy…and we will do everything it takes to prevent this from happening again”
August 8, 2005 Emergency regulations for heat illness
Public health action
Effective July 27, 2006 Effective July 27, 2006
23 May 14, 2008
• Maria Isabel Vasquez, age 17, two months pregnant • Immigrant from Oaxaca • Pruning grapes, employed by labor contractor x 3 days • 95 degree heat in Atwater • Collapsed and taken by driver to clinic with core temp = 108o • Died 2 days later
"Maria's death should have been prevented, and all Californians must do everything in their power to ensure no other worker suffers the same fate." - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, May 28, 2008
Other faces
Maria Isabel Jimenez Ramiro Rodriguez May 14, 2008 July 9, 2008 17 y.o. picking grapes 48 y.o. picking nectarines
Jose Hernandez Jorge Herrera June 20, 2008 July 31, 2008 64 y.o. picking squash 37 y.o. loading grapes
Abdon Garcia Maria Alvarez July 9, 2008 August 2, 2008 46 y.o. loading grapes 63 y.o. picking grapes
24 “Bob – the leaves are falling all over the sidewalk!”
25 “Here Bob, I got a flyer in the mail. Call this guy he says he can do it tomorrow. ”
117,000 looking for work each day
50/50 private households and construction contractors Moving and hauling, landscaping, painting, roofing, drywall
26 “You know Robin, I heard these guys may not be really trained all that well.”
“Okay fine Bob, but we really need those branches trimmed”
27 +
“I just called an arborist guy, he’s coming out here tomorrow to give us a bid”
Very awkward posture
Going solar! My roof in Noe Valley. Could he trip?
It’s a long way down
Will this hold if he falls?
28 Irma Ortiz
• 40 y.o. woman • Mixed dry powder with diacetyl x 5 years • Symptoms of shortness of breath and cough. Treated for asthma. • FEV1 = 0.55 L (18% predicted). HRCT with ground glass opacities.
California Department of Health Services http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ohb/flavorings.htm Baltimore Sun - April 23, 2006 Sacramento Bee - July 30, 2006
Bronchiolitis obliterans
• NIOSH study at “sentinel” microwave popcorn plant • 4 of 8 workers on lung transplant list • One recent death
29 Toxicology studies
Exposed • Multifocal necrotizing bronchitis in rats exposed to 285-371 ppm of diacetyl
Control
Hubbs et aL: Necrosis of nasal and airway epithelium in rats inhaling vapors of artificial butter flavoring. Tox Applied Pharm 185:128 (2002).
Epidemiology studies Abnormal Spirometry by Diacetyl Exposure
40 35 • Airways obstruction in 30 25 popcorn workers 20 15 related to cumulative 10 5 diacetyl exposure 0
% affected % Lowest Second Third Highest quartile quartile levels (dose-response relationship) Cumulative diacetyl exposure quartiles
Kreiss K et al. Clinical bronchiolitis obliterans in workers at a microwave popcorn plant. NEJM 347:330 (2002).
Public health action
• Risk notification of employers, HCPs • Study of CA companies with use of diacetyl • Proposed Cal/OSHA standard
30 April 27, 2007 MMWR Publication Materna B et al.
Industry-wide Medical Surveillance of Workers in California Flavor Manufacturing Companies: Cross-sectional Results
Kim TJ, Materna BL. Prudhomme JC, Fedan KB, Enright PL,Sahakian NM, Windham GC, Kriess K: Amer J Ind Med 53: 857-65, 2010.
Petition for emergency standard CalOSHA 2006 - 2010 • AFL/CIO petition 8/24/06 for emergency standard granted by Standards Board 1/18/07 - referred to advisory committee • Advisory meetings held 9/28/06, 2/13/07, 3/21/07, and 5/18/07 • Public hearing 11/19/09 • Final standard passed September 16, 2010
31 § 5197 Occupational Exposure to Food Flavorings Containing Diacetyl.
• Medical surveillance at least every 6 months if > 1% diacetyl is used, or case of fixed obstructive lung disease • “Knowledgeable” occupational or pulmonary medicine • Mandatory Flavor Worker Questionnaires • Spirometry by NIOSH-certified technician • Medical removal benefits
DCM fatalities in bathtub refinishers: US
• In early 2012, Michigan FACE, Fed/OSHA, and NIOSH collaborated on an MMWR article documenting a total of 13 fatalities among bathtub refinishers in US between 2000 and 2011. • All were linked to DCM inhalation.
32 33 .87 g/m3 ------ACGIH STEL
34 Baptist Church, Southern California (May 2010) • 24 year-old maintenance worker was assigned to strip the Baptismal Font of the church using DCM-containing stripper. • Worker applied ~ 1 gallon of “Klean-Strip Premium Sprayable Stripper” to floor.
56
35 June 23, 2017 - California
36 European Union banned sale to general public in 2009 “Paint strippers containing DCM are used by members of the general public at home to remove paints, varnishes and lacquers both indoors and outdoors. The safe use of DCM by them cannot be ensured by training or monitoring. Therefore, the only measure effective in eliminating the risks arising for the general public from paint strippers containing DCM is a ban, with respect to the general public, on the marketing, supply and use of such paint strippers.”
April 28, 2017 - Tennessee
37 Drew Wynne February 12, 1986 - October 14, 2017
Joshua Atkins November 9, 1986 – February 12, 2018
38 Artificial Stone Silicosis: Disease Resurgence Among Artificial Stone Workers
Kramer et al: Chest 2012
39 Outbreak of silicosis in Spanish quartz conglomerate workers
Perez-Alonso et al., Int J Occ Environ Health, 2014
MMWR Case Report February 13, 2015
40 41 Fatal silicosis in engineered stone fabrication worker – CA, 2019*
37 year old immigrant from El Salvador with 8 years exposure to silica dust (>20x PEL) while fabricating engineering stone. Biopsy + mixed dust pneumoconiosis 2013 (K. Jones), systemic sclerosis. Died from respiratory failure - September 2018. * Heinzerling, Flattery, Weinberg, Blanc, Balmes, Elicker, Potocko, Guiness, Harrison)
Bronchiolitis obliterans is best characterized by:
A. Reversible airways obstruction on PFTs
B. Mosaic attenuation and bronchial wall thickening on HRCT
C. Response to bronchodilators
D. Mononuclear cell infiltration and poorly formed granulomas on pathology
42 Silica dust exposure can cause all EXCEPT: A. Bilateral diffuse ground glass opacities
B. Increased risk of TB
C. Systemic sclerosis
D. Liver cancer
Acute methylene chloride fatalities may be due to: A. Carboxyhemoglobin formation
B. CNS depression
C. Cardiac sensitization
D. All of the above
43 44 How Medical Humanities Can Inform Our Thinking About Vulnerable Populations Brian Dolan, PhD Chair, Department of Anthropology, History & Social Medicine UCSF
I have nothing to disclose
What is / are the medical humanities? (a.k.a. health humanities)
Goes back 100 years referring to non‐science instruction for medical students in subjects such as history, accounting, foreign languages.
The rise of social sciences and literary studies in the 1960s onward now also groups in subjects such as bioethics, medical anthropology, sociology, and narrative medicine.
Broadly, anything that studies social relations of science, clinical practice, and patients.
45 What is a vulnerable population?
Vulnerable
Latin: vulnus (wound)
“capable of being attacked, harmed, or injured in some way.” ‐ R.E. Goodin, Protecting the Vulnerable (University of Chicago Press, 1985)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Adopted by United Nations General Assembly in 1948, the documents do not single out any particular group.
Considering the universal nature of human rights, does singling out a certain group defeat the purpose of seeing human rights (e.g., dignity and equality) as something for everyone?
Some philosophers suggest everyone has “embodied vulnerability” making vulnerability a universal, not a particular, trait.
Outline
History: The legislative evolution of the term “vulnerable population”
Bioethics: The rise of responsible conduct of research protocols
Global Health: The challenge of cross‐cultural research
Sociology: The irony of exclusion in clinical trials
Medical Anthropology: Refining the clinical encounter to detect structural vulnerabilities
Narrative Medicine: Giving voice to vulnerable populations
46 National Institutes of Health, WMA
1953: Clinical Research Center established Ethics board to review all proposed research at the hospital according to Nuremberg Code: informed consent, risk‐benefit analysis, patient’s right to withdraw participation
1964: NIH Director James Shannon established policy that all public research funded by NIH be reviewed by ethics board
1964: World Medical Association adopts Helsinki Declaration
47 Milestones in Ethical Codes
1947 Nuremberg Code 1949 World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics 1964 Helsinki Declaration 1966 U.S. Surgeon General policy statement
1974 National Research Act (Public Law 93‐348) * first federal law regulating human subject research
National Research Act (1974) Title I: Biomedical and Behavioral Research Training Title II: Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
Establishes National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research
Commission produces a number of recommendations to protect fetuses (1975), prisoners (1976), children (1977), mentally infirm (1978), IRBs (1978)
Culminates in “Belmont Report” (1979) that guides enforcement of federal regulations.
48 The challenges of global health interventions
2001: Office of Human Research Protection: “special classes of subjects”
* traumatized / comatose patients * elderly / aged patients * minorities * students * employees * normal volunteers
2002: WMA revised Helsinki Declaration: “economically and medically disadvantaged”
49 Six types of vulnerability 1. Cognitive 2. Juridic 3. Deferential 4. Medical 5. Allocational 6. Infrastructural
Academic Medicine 92:3 (2017)
Narrative Medicine and Voices of Vulnerability
50 Thank you
Quiz to follow
Q1: Which of the following represents the US Government’s FIRST federal law regulating biomedical research on human subjects?
A) The Nuremberg Code of 1947 B) The Helsinki Declaration of 1964 C) The National Research Act of 1974 D) The Belmont Report of 1979
Q2: “Infrastructural vulnerability,” referred to by Kenneth Kipnis when working for the National Bioethics Advisory Commission in 2001, does NOT refer to which the following:
A) The socio‐economic background of the research subject B) The availability of a skilled healthcare professional C) The existence of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to check the study design D) A reliable supply of electricity when an investigation requires frozen biological agents
51 Q3: According to some philosophers, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is at odds with the concept of identifying a specific vulnerable population because:
A) Modern medicine has elevated everyone above the threat of vulnerability B) The whole human rights system is founded on a concern for “embodied vulnerability” that affects everyone, universally C) Human rights apply only to citizens of Enlightened, democratic governments D) Vulnerability is a useless term that is impossible to define or measure
52 Lung Disease, Miners, and Mining Communities, a Global Population at Risk University of California, San Francisco – Division of OEM March 14, 2019
Robert Cohen, MD, FCCP Clinical Professor - EOHS, University of Illinois School of Public Health Chicago, Illinois
Professor of Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Aerial view of Brumadinho, Brazil 1/25/19
Disclosure of Financial Interest
Funded by the Alpha Foundation for the Improvement of Mine Safety and Health Funded by HHS/HRSA/ORHP/BLCP & BLCE Employee of NIOSH/RHD Funded by USDOL/OWCP & MSHA Funded by Queensland Government, Australia Provide IME’s for Occupational Lung Disease
Goals for Today’s Talk
Discuss examples of mining related lung disease in global populations Describe risks to communities from mining related activities Surface Mining Underground Mining Mine Materials Processing Give examples of mining related disasters that affect workers, their families, and their communities
53 Coal’s Deadly Dust – Frontline/PBS/NPR 1/22/19
Rapidly Progressive CWP by County
0%
4.5 - 20.0%
22.2 - 40.0%
41.7 - 60%
61.5 - 80%
* Results from NIOSH Coal Workers’ Health Surveillance Program, 1996-2002 Not shown are counties with fewer than 5 miners evaluated
PA
OH
WV
VA KY
54 Results
Risk factors Smaller mine > larger mine Longer tenure in jobs at face Younger > older Implicating recent mining conditions Other factors Mining technique Approaches to dust control Enforcement of PEL
NIOSH CWHSP – Surveillance of Active Miners
. Participating medical facilities . NIOSH mobile outreach . Screening chest radiographs received in FY-2017 7423 radiographs received 3110 underground miners 2383 from surface miners 1930 from contractors 2812/7423 from mobile outreach unit . Screening lung function with spirometry currently being implemented as part of testing offered by CWHSP
Radiographic Findings of Pneumoconiosis in CWHSP Participants (5‐year moving average)
40
35 Mining Tenure 25+ 20-24 30 15-19 10-14 0-9 25
20
Prevalence (%) Prevalence 15
10
5
0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year
55 Radiographic Findings of Pneumoconiosis in CWHSP Participants from KY, VA, and WV (5‐year moving average) 40
Mining Tenure 35 25+ 20-24 30 15-19 10-14 0-9 25
20
Prevalence (%) Prevalence 15
10
5
0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year
Radiographic Findings of Pneumoconiosis in CWHSP Participants Other Than From KY, VA, WV (5‐year moving average) 40
35 Mining Tenure 25+ 20-24 30 15-19 10-14 0-9 25
20
Prevalence (%) Prevalence 15
10
5
0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year
Blackley DJ, Halldin CN, Laney AS. Resurgence of a debilitating and entirely preventable respiratory disease among working coal miners. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(6):708-709. doi:10.1164/rccm.20 1407-1286LE.
Prevalence of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) among working underground coal miners with at least 25 years of underground mining tenure in KY, VA, and WV
56 1/1/15–8/17/16, a total of 60 patients with PMF 49 had their radiograph taken during 2016. High proportion of miners with very advanced disease: 52% category A 38% category B 10% category C Surveillance data have indicated a resurgence of PMF in recent years, but the cases described in this report represent a large cluster not discovered through routine surveillance.
Chest radiograph image taken in 2016 of a 56-year-old male eastern Kentucky resident with 29 years of total mining tenure (including 11 years as a roof bolter). Category C PMF , Profusion q/q 3/2
57 416 Case of PMF from 3 Clinics in VA
Blackley et. al. JAMA 319:5 p. 500-501
The prevalence of PMF among former miners is less well understood. Data taken from the U.S. Department of Labor Office of Workers Compensation Administrative Data Set Used DOL determination classification of PMF and total disability This study is the first to report trends in the proportion of Black Lung claimants with PMF using data from the Federal Black Lung Program. These data are independent of national surveillance data and help us further understand the burden of PMF among former U.S. coal miners.
58 Results
Evaluated 341,176 claims between 1970–2016 PMF % of claims increased from 1970–2016 PMF % of claims accelerated since 1996. 2,474 cases of PMF identified from 1996–2016 This is more than 10 times the number identified CWHSP (n=225). Increase in PMF occurred as workforce declined and claim rate remained stable. PMF cases greatest from Kentucky, Virginia, and West Virginia.
450 250,000
400
200,000 350
300 150,000 250
200 100,000 150
Number of Claimants Claimants withPMF of Number 100 50,000
50 Employees Mine Coal of Number Average
0 0 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Year Figure 1. Number of miners with PMF compared to average annual coal mine employment, 1970– 2016. The number of claimants with PMF from 1970–1972 are combined due to small numbers. Office workers are included in employment totals from 1973–1977. Data sources: U.S. DOL, OWCP, DCMWC; U.S. DOL, MSHA; and the EIA.
Geographic Distribution of PMF Cases
59 PMF cases found in retired miners who never participated in NIOSH CWHSP.
Why don’t miners participate? Holes in the social safety net: 1985 – 2005, employment in the Appalachia coal mining industry declined by 56% due to Cost of coal relative to oil and natural gas Increased mechanization Shift to contract labor Fear of job loss Fear of disease and associated disability Mistrust of government
Reynolds L, Halldin CN, Laney AS, Blackley DJ. Coal miner participation in a job transfer program designed to prevent progression of pneumoconiosis, United States, 1986–2016. Arch Environ Occup Health. November 2017
Part 90 Option
Miner notified Miner can Miner of radiographic exercise Part 90 findings participates option through consistent with in CWHSP MSHA CWP
60 Part 90 Option Program Data
NIOSH MSHA CWHSP Miners who Eligible Part 90 exercised their Part option miners 90 option
Exercising the Part 90 Option
14% of eligible miners exercised their Part 90 right in the last 30 years Median days to exercise Part 90 option was 63 days (range 0 – 10831 days) Miners who exercised their option more quickly were older and had longer mining tenures
Exercising the Part 90 Option
Miners working in central Appalachia were less likely to exercise Part 90 compared to those in other states Miners from Virginia and Kentucky were least likely to exercise their option, at 8.9 % and 9.8% Miners from Utah and Colorado were most likely to exercise their option, at 32.8% and 30.2%
61 Mining Disasters
Mining Related Disasters
Explosions Inundations Roof Falls – Mine Collapse Fires
62 Inundations – Quecreek, Somerset, PA July 24-28, 2002
9 Miners trapped for 77 hours Rescue hole was drilled Capsule lowered and all were saved
SAGO MINE EXPLOSION
DRIFT JANUARY 2, 2006 OPENI NG INTERNATIONAL COAL GROUP SAGO MINE
MSHA I.D. No. 46-08791
Sago Mine Explosion and Fire
12 Miners died and one severely injured in the explosion occurred at approximately 6:26 AM on January 2, 2006.
63 5/22/2006 Darby Mine, Kentucky 5 Miners died in methane mine explosion
Aracoma Alma Mine # 1 Conveyer Belt Fire – 2 Deaths Logan County, WVA
Crandall Canyon Mine Utah
August 6, 2007 and August 16, 2007 Roof Fall During Retreat Mining 3 Rescuers died in subsequent bump event
64 Upper Big Branch Mine - April 5, 2010
Upper Big Branch, April 5, 2010
Fire and Explosion Killed 29 Miners Analysis of the pattern of injuries from the Upper Big Branch Disaster showed 10 deaths from CO The remainder primarily due to blast and thermal injuries A systematic pathologic review suggests a continuing high proportion had pneumoconiosis 86% Settlement of law suit resulting from the disaster resulted in the formation of the Alpha Foundation which is funding part of our work
65 Copiapó mining accident – Chile 2010 33 Men trapped for 69 days – roof fall
The Case of the Cananea Copper Mine – Sonoro Mexico
66 Cananea Copper Mine
Mexico’s Largest Open Pit Mine Opened in 1899 Open pit mining techniques – drilling and blasting Ore greater than 0.34% copper is then ground to powder Agitated with water and reagents
Cananea Copper Mine
Sent to flotation cells Air pumped in causing it to froth and copper mineral floats Copper then concentrates with average of 26.6% copper and sent to smelter for processing Ore between 0.15% and 0.34% is sent to leaching facility where sulfuric acid is poured onto material in a leaching procedure solvent extraction with electrowinning
Cananea Copper Mine
Workers struck in 2007 over working conditions, health, and control of the union Site of 1906 Strike that fueled the Mexican revolution against then Presdient Porfirio Diaz. Mexican army took back the site in 2010.
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Strike Support Rally
Mexican Miners Union National Forum Cananea Union Hall
February 2, 2008
Strike was crushed by Federal Government forces in 2010
78 79 Mining Related Environmental Disasters
Dam Failures Fresh Water Contamination with heavy metals, chemicals Air Pollution – dust, diesel exhaust particulate Subsidence
Cananea Copper Mine – Environmental Disaster – 8/6/14
Massive spill of copper sulfate 40,000 m3 leaked into tributary of Sonora river and San Pedro River
80 Cananea copper mine spill August 6, 2014
Polluted Arroyo Las Tinajas (17.6 km) Bacanuchi River (64 km) The main stream of the Sonora River (190 km) Affected seven municipalities inhabited by 20,048 people. The pollution led the government to close 322 wells, leaving local communities without water for domestic and farming uses.
Miners and farmers unite to protest Grupo Mexico’s Handling of Spill 3/27/15
81 Charleston West Virginia – Elk River
Kanawah River Contamination 1/9/2014
Storage Tanks of 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol (MCHM) – coal floculent ruptured and spilled into Kanawah River 7,500 gallons leaked Also contaminated with glycol ethers (PPH)
Kanawah River Contamination Charleston, WV
The chemical smelled like licorice in the parts per billion concentration so it was detected by the population. Seperates fossil fuel from dirt and rock Used in coal prep plants Affected 300,000 West Virginians Had been classified as non-hazardous chemical and therefore not regulated
82 Retention Dam Failures Brumadinho, Brazil 1/25/19
Brumadinho – Iron Ore Mine – Minas Gerais, Brazil
Killed 186 with 122 still missing Owned by BHP/Vale Mining Corporation Prior Dam Failure in 2015 Prosecutors removed top 3 executives March 3, 2019
83 Dam/incident Location Fatalities Details A tailings dam at copper mine near the city of Vratsa failed. A total 450,000 cu m of mud and water inundated Vratsa and Mina Plakalnitsa Vratsa, Retention Dam107 Failuresthe nearby village of Zgorigrad, which suffered widespread 5/1/1966 Bulgaria damage. The official death toll is 107, but the unofficial estimate is around 500 killed. Certej Mine, Certej dam failure 89 A tailings dam built too tall collapsed, flooding Certeju de 10/30/1971 Romania Sus with toxic tailings. Unstable loose constructed dam created by local coal Buffalo Creek Flood West Virginia, 125 mining company, collapsed in heavy rain. 1,121 injured, 507 2/26/1972 United States houses destroyed, over 4,000 left homeless.
Martin County coal slurry Failure of a coal slurry impoundment. The water supply for over Martin County, spill 27,000 residents was contaminated. One of the worst United States 0 10/11/2000 environmental disasters ever in the southeastern United States.
Failure of concrete impound wall on alumina plant tailings Ajka alumina plant Ajka, dam. One million cubic meters of red ;mud contaminated a accident 10 Hungary large area, within days the mud had reached the Danumbe 10/4/2010 river. Tailings dam collapsed. One village destroyed, 600 people Mariana dam disaster Mariana, 19 evacuated. 60 million cubic meters of iron waste slurry 11/5/2015 Minas Gerais, Brazil polluted Doce River, and the near the river's mouth. Brumadinho, Brumadinho dam disaster 142 Tailings dam suffered a catastrophic failure releasing 12 million 1/25/2019 Minas Gerais, Brazil cubic meters of tailings slurry. 248 people missing.
Tailings Dam Collapses
84 85 86 Risks associated with mining to workers and their communities include all of the following except:
A. Inundations/Dam Failure B. Infections such as HIV AIDS and Tuberculosis C. X-ray exposure D. Excess non-malignant respiratory disease E. Air and water pollution
All of the following mining related contaminants have been associated with lung cancer
A. Radon B. Silica C.Lead D.Diesel Exhaust
87 Rural communities have suffered major adverse health effects related to mining including all of the following except:
A.Subsidence B. Air pollution C.Water Pollution D.Retention Dam Failures E. Heavy metal toxicity
88 Vulnerable workers in NYC Workplace hazards and interacting risk factors
Presented at UCSF conference on Vulnerable workers and communities at environmental risk University of California, San Francisco March 14, 2019
George Friedman‐Jimenez, MD, DrPH, Director Acran Salmen‐Navarro, MD, MSc, Ergonomist and Program Coordinator
Bellevue/NYU Occupational Environmental Medicine Clinic NYU School of Medicine and Bellevue | NYC Health and Hospitals
1
Disclosure slide
Dr. Friedman‐Jimenez declares no conflicts of interest. Dr. Salmen‐Navarro declares no conflicts of interest.
2
Learning Objectives After this session, participants will be better able to: Describe important work‐related exposures and illnesses that may disproportionately impact vulnerable workers. Explain how non‐work‐related risk factors can increase vulnerability of workers to work‐related illness or injury. Use understanding of interacting work‐related and non‐work‐related risk factors to facilitate prevention of work‐related illnesses and injuries in vulnerable workers. 3
89 Definitions Vulnerable: Exposed to the possibility of being attacked or harmed (Oxford) Can include aspects of risk (probability), severity of potential harm, difficulty of avoiding harm Worker: A person who does a specified type of work or who works in a specified way, especially one who does manual or non‐executive work (Oxford) More inclusive than “employee”, can also include “independent contractors”, self‐employed Risk factor: A risk factor is any attribute, characteristic or exposure of an individual that increases the likelihood of developing a disease or injury. (WHO) This definition suggests causation but in common usage, some RFs have non‐causal explanations like chance or bias 4
Definition of Work‐Related
“You must consider an injury or illness to be work‐related if an event or exposure in the work environment either caused or contributed to the resulting condition or significantly aggravated a pre‐existing injury or illness.”
Source: US Federal OSHA 1904.5(a) determination of work‐relatedness
Demographics of working populations in NYC
In NYC (2016) population was 29% “Hispanic or Latino”, 32% “White”, 22% “Black or African American”, 13% “Asian”, 3% multiple races. Rates of low‐income and poverty among “Hispanic or Latino” and “Other race” are almost two times higher than those among “White”. More than one of third of the NYC population are foreign born and about half of them speak language other than English at home. Foreign‐born adults are less educated and less likely to have access to health care than US‐born adults.
6
90 NYC family income by race/ethnicity
Black / Hispanic Some Two or Race* White African Latino, Asian Other More American any race Race Races Total # of 812,449 473,282 519,327 235,169 275,434 38,228 family Total # of 3,535,281 2,007,826 2,279,348 1,020,507 1,186,755 212,724 people Income below 515,342 515,342 634,319 187,132 355,204 45,885 poverty Percent Income below 15% 22% 28% 18% 30% 22% poverty
NYC Family Income in The Past 12 Months (In 2011 Inflation-Adjusted Dollars) Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-2011 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. * Except where noted, 'race' refers to people reporting only one race. ‘ Hispanic' refers to an ethnic category; Hispanics may be of any race. http://www.census.gov/easystats/ 7
Why do some people get a disease and others don’t?
Genetic factors Environmental factors including infections and socioeconomic factors Other (acquired) differences in susceptibility Aging “Chance”
Why do some people get a disease and others don’t?
If 80% of cases of a disease are believed to be caused by genetic factors, then all the other factors (environmental, socioeconomic, aging, etc) cause the other 20%, right?
91 Gene‐Environment Interaction Nearly all diseases result from a complex interaction between an individual’s genetic make‐up and the environmental agents that he or she is exposed to. (NIEHS website) When G‐E interaction, the “genetic” fraction and the “environmental” fraction typically add up to well over 100% Extreme example: Phenylketonuria Genetic fraction: close to 100% have phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) deficiency Environmental fraction: 100% have dietary phenylalanine exposure Sum near 200% because both genetic and environmental factors are needed to produce the disease in each individual G‐E interaction, "a different effect of an environmental exposure on disease risk in persons with different genotypes“ (Ottman, 1996) Environmental factors can interact with each other as well as with genetic factors
Some Occupations at High Risk for Work‐Related Illnesses (WRI) in NYC
Building maintenance and cleaning workers, residential, commercial Demolition / construction laborers Car wash workers Dry cleaning and laundry workers Food preparation, retail and delivery workers Musicians, other workers in entertainment venues with loud music Healthcare workers and health aides Mechanics, auto, public transport, aircraft Hairdressers, manicurists / pedicurists, and cosmetologists Sanitation and sewer workers Transportation workers: taxi, bus, subway Painters; furniture refinishers; Florists, landscapers, and groundskeepers; carpenters helpers & woodworkers; roofers; road repair & bridge workers; welders; animal handling workers; cashiers, convenience store and other retail workers; exterminators; artists and artisans; morticians and morgue workers; …
Common workplace exposures that can cause WRI
Cleaning and disinfection agents including chlorine bleach, quaternary ammonium compounds, detergent enzymes Poor ergonomic design of furniture, tools, machines, production processes Lead, mercury, arsenic, manganese, cadmium, other metals Asbestos, silica, coal, mixed mineral dusts Known and reasonably anticipated human carcinogens Methylene Chloride, trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, methyl ethyl ketone, n‐hexane, other solvents Several hundred airborne high and low molecular weight sensitizing agents that can cause occupational asthma Even more airborne irritants that can aggravate asthma or other existing lung diseases
92 WRIs commonly seen in the BNOEMC
WR lung disorders: Asthma Upper airway irritation Other airway obstruction and COPD Pulmonary fibrosis HP/EAA Contact dermatitis, mostly irritant, sometimes allergic or unclear which Upper extremity WMSDs, other manual material handling injuries, CTS Lead, mercury toxicity and exposure Dietary/supplement elevations in arsenic, lead, mercury Sound induced hearing loss Fragrance‐related medically unexplained symptoms 13
Risk factors/causes for these WRI: RF is WR, Modifiable
Current toxicant, allergen, particulate, infectious exposures Poor ergonomics or physically unsafe conditions Low wages => long work hours, multiple jobs Workplace power relationships that discourage or block preventive interventions Workplace stress Unorganized workers may have more difficulty negotiating preventive workplace interventions Vocational training and ability to switch to job with less hazardous exposures Inadequate OSH training Workplace with racist, sexist, classist policies, prejudiced individual managers & coworkers Poor access to medical care, housing long distance from work 14
Risk factors/causes for these WRI: RF is WR, Not Modifiable Past WR exposures with potential long term effects: asbestos, ETS, Pb, other persistent toxicants, ergonomic risk factors Past allergen sensitization Relevant WR comorbid medical conditions
15
93 Risk factors/causes for these WRI: RF is Not WR, but is Modifiable
Language limitations Vocational training Match of educational/job skill limitations/aging and changing societal demand for job skills Current lifestyle: diet, exercise, tobacco, alcohol and other drugs Relevant non‐WR comorbid medical conditions
16
Risk factors/causes for these WRI: RF is Not WR, Not Modifiable Time (Age, Induction and latency period) Genetic constitution Past lifestyle exposures with potential long term effects: diet, exercise, tobacco and other drugs Race, ethnicity, immigrant status, religion Culturally/politically entrenched racism, sexism, classism Societal political forces discouraging unions, worker organizations, appropriate and effective regulatory legislation and enforcement Community and family poverty Sex, sexual orientation‐, gender identity‐related factors
17
Risk factors/causes for WRI
4 categories of WR/modifiability RF is probably Work‐Related and potentially modifiable RF is probably Work‐Related but difficult or impossible to modify RF is probably not Work‐Related but is potentially modifiable RF is probably neither Work‐Related nor modifiable While OH focuses on modifiable WR causes, non‐WR causes synergistic with WR causes may amplify the risk of the WR causes leading to disparities in risk of WRIs Subgroups with excess WRI risk due to synergisms with non‐WR causes may thus be particularly important targets for control of the modifiable WR causes
Irving Selikoff, “Go where the (occupational) dise1a8 se is.”
94 Medical conditions identified as most important in NYCH+H outpatients 10 most significant Community Health Needs as ranked by NYCH+H facilities 1) Hypertension 6) Substance use 2) Diabetes 7) Asthma 3) Obesity 8) Cancer 4) Heart disease 9) Smoking 5) Mental illness 10) Violence Some may be WR in some patients, some may interact with WR exposures to increase vulnerability to WRIs eConsult being developed to improve primary care providers’ access to specialist expertise, including OM
19
Multiple causes of a disease, illness or disability are the rule, not the exception
Different causes (WR or non‐WR) can be mutually exclusive Different causal pathways or “mechanisms” No interactions OR Different causes can contribute to the same causal pathway or “mechanism”
Note that “Mechanism” can be used in a general multilevel sense Genetic/epigenetic/molecular Cellular/organ Whole person Socioeconomic/political/societal
Understanding how multiple causes interact (or not) can help with preventive interventions as well as with Workers’ Compensation 20
Accurate judgment of work‐relatedness in individual patients is important Workers with actual WRI that are erroneously judged not WR or for whom WR causes are lightly dismissed or not even considered: May experience preventable worsening or progression of illnesses or disabilities due to ongoing WR exposures that should have been stopped Will not get Workers’ Compensation benefits to which they are entitled Workers with non‐WRI erroneously attributed to WR causes: May be fired, demoted, marginalized or otherwise harmed trying to get unneeded workplace interventions implemented These interventions are not needed and would not have been effective, since they did not cause, contribute to or aggravate the illness Workers’ Compensation for qualified WRIs can be critically important Enable access to medical care for the WRI Enable prevention of further exposure and progression of injury, disease or disability by avoiding forced re‐exposure to hazards Reduce the likelihood of poverty for the patient and his or her family, prevent need for public assistance, prevent homelessness. Make death benefits to family possible 21
95 Definition of Cause
“A cause of a disease occurrence is an event, condition or characteristic that preceded the disease onset and that, had the event, condition or characteristic been different in a specified way, the disease either would not have occurred or would have occurred at a later time.”
Source: Rothman, Modern Epidemiology, 2008
22
Rothman (1976) “Pie Model” of Component and Sufficient Causes
SC1 SC2 SC3 SC4
Each exposure (Asbestos and/or Smoking) is a component cause (CC) in one or more Sufficient Causes (SC) Each U is a set of unmeasured CCs necessary to complete that particular SC mechanism, eg: Genetic factors eg, CYP1A1 and others for lung cancer Induction period for initiation, and latency period for development and clinical manifestation of the disease Comorbid conditions affecting disease risk 23
“Causal Pie Bingo” Source: Johnson & Howards ltr, Epidemiology 2013 The U and each observed exposure occur over time and can accumulate in each person. In a population, there is generally more than one SC for each outcome. Can think of each SC as a different complete mechanism for exposure‐disease causation. The outcome occurs as soon as the person has accumulated all the CCs for one SC mechanism. The first SC that is completed “wins”, ie is the only one that counts for attribution Which SC actually occurred often cannot be identified clinically or epidemiologically. 24
96 What is Interaction? RFs / causes can combine in additive, sub‐ additive or supra‐additive manner Additive causes often called no interaction Sub‐additive interactions called antagonism Supra‐additive interactions called synergism “Multiplicative” is a special case of supra‐ additive interaction
25
Asbestos, Asbestosis, Smoking, and Lung Cancer (Markowitz 2013)
26
Asbestos, Asbestosis, Smoking, and Lung Cancer (Markowitz 2013)
Groups Exposures Age Adj RR All workers No ASB, No SMK 1 ASB, No SMK 5.2 No ASB, SMK 10.3 ASB, SMK 28.4
No Asbestosis No ASB, No SMK 1 ASB, No SMK 3.6 No ASB, SMK 10.3 ASB, SMK 14.4
Asbestosis No ASB, No SMK 1 ASB, No SMK 7.4 No ASB, SMK 10.3 ASB, SMK 36.8 27
97 Combined excess risk of LC from asbestos and smoking
Is there interaction between asbestos a and smoking s? In simplistic additive model (no interaction), sum of individualexcess RRs equal the joint excess RR (RRa‐1) + (RRs‐1) = joint excess RRas = RRas‐1
No asbestosis: Risks of LC due to asbestos and smoking are closeto additive, few cases due to joint a+s exposure (3.6‐1) + (10.3‐1) = 11.9 and joint excess RRas = 14.4‐1=13.4
Asbestosis: Risks of LC due to asbestos and smoking are supra‐ additive (interaction, synergism) (7.4‐1) + (10.3‐1) = 15.7 and joint excess RRas = 36.8‐1 = 35.8
More cases due to joint a+s exp than to either one alone Irving Selikoff, “Go where the disease is.” 28
56 year old woman food preparation worker with lateral epicondylitis
WR factors: shucked oysters 3‐4 hours a day, forceful supination R hand, high pace of work Non‐WR factors: accountant in Mexico, not used to manual labor, low English proficiency, could not find non‐manual job, workers not organized by union or worker center Diagnoses: Lateral epicondylitis, R; trigger finger, R middle Etiologies: Repetitive forceful R hand supination, poor tool design, forced fast pace of work, difficulty changing jobs, worker organization not available Medical tx: Rehab, PT, NSAIDS Workplace preventive treatment included: “Light duty” change in job tasks: her orthopaedist wrote letter that she should not lift more than 5 pounds, led to her being fired 3 months medical leave supported by Workers’ Comp New job in bakery with no repeated forceful supination of hand Potential role for Preventive Ergonomic interventions and Collaborative Community/University occupational health approach, collective bargaining for H&S improvements, however workplace was not organized
Ergonomic Oyster Shucking Knife A or B?
AB Why? 30
98 Community/university collaborative approaches
Sanctuary Service • New York City’s public policies, which is focused on a no discrimination policy regardless of income or immigration status • Safe Haven Hospital System
Clinic’s outreach program • Community Based Organizations (CBO) • Unions • Organized workers • Proactive employers
Community/university collaborative approaches
Community Organizations / Unions • Community Based worker centers are often ethnically focused • CBO worker centers and unions can synergistically enhance the effectiveness of one or the other to address workplace H&S issues of immigrant workers.
Proactive Employers • Case 1 ‐ ROC New York Project – Restaurant Workers • Case 2 ‐ Proactive improvement – Restaurant owner case • Case 3‐ Carwash encounter with Owner’s representative
Vulnerable Worker and Community
NYC working population disparities, cultural and social determinants
99 Vulnerable Worker and Community
Occupational health and Immigration • Over 3 million migrant workers in NYC • Over 300 thousand Undocumented workers in NYC • Voluntary / Forced Migration • Occupational downgrading and undervalued
Aging working population • Combined vulnerability • Shifting from physical to experience demand
Community / university industry‐specific ergonomic intervention
Restaurants • Chef / Sous chef • Cook • Pastries • Dishwasher • Waiter Office
• Office Ergonomics
Community / university industry‐specific ergonomic intervention
Carwash • Soaping • Vacuuming • Drying • Driving Hospitality • Housekeeping • Bell boys • Front desk • Hotel laundries • Kitchen Nail Salons • Steward • Manicure • Pedicure • Chemical exposure • UV Light
100 Community / university industry‐specific ergonomic intervention
Construction • Demolition • Carpenters • Cement • Bridge • Electricians • Plumbers
• Supermarkets Checkout cashiers • Shelving • Fruit / Vegetable • Meat / Fish / Poultry
Community / university industry‐specific ergonomic intervention
Laundries
• Bag sizes • Bag content • Sorting • Chemical usage
Community / university industry‐specific ergonomic intervention
Participatory Ergonomic intervention / Preventive Culture Training: Train‐the‐Trainer: Direct and Indirect Impact • Work Leaders • OSHA‐10 / 30 trainings • Daylabor (Paradas) trainings “Mujeres y hombres de la esquina” • Evidence based scientific program reviews • Community Awareness Clinic Referral: Case management / Safe return to work
101 42 year old man, car wash worker with foot infection WR factors Shoes frequently soaked all day with run‐off solution of cleaning chemicals including KOH solution used to clean wheels 12 hour workdays, 6 days per week, waterproof footwear not provided Non‐WR factors No medical insurance, poor access to medical care, poorly controlled DM Ecuadorian immigrant, difficulty finding other jobs Unable to take days off due to financial situation Diagnoses: Fungal infection of both feet, onychomycosis, cracked skin between toes, bacterial superinfection one foot Etiologies: direct effects and interaction between WR exposures, poorly controlled DM, inability to change jobs
40
42 year old man, car wash worker with foot infection Medical treatment: Antifungal, antibiotics, improved foot hygiene, treatment of DM Workplace preventive interventions: Waterproof footwear, change socks if wet, improve floor drainage Worker center collaborated with union to organize Latino workers Clinic provided IH and ergonomic recommendations for preventive interventions Current status: Union voted in, contract signed with H&S language, some H&S changes made but more negotiation will be needed to get employer to cooperate fully to implement H&S changes
41
Car wash worker in wet shoes
42
102 New programs at NYCH+H|Bellevue to improve OH of vulnerable workers
Telehealth and eConsult to improve referrals between occ med and primary care Identify, diagnose, preventively treat primary care patients with work‐related asthma Identify, diagnose, ergonomically evaluate and preventively treat primary care patients with work‐ related musculoskeletal disorders Facilitate filing of Workers’ Compensation for patients with WRIs seen in other Bellevue clinics OH needs assessment NYC Asian‐American workers
Collaborative approach to Occupational Health Unions Collective bargaining, negotiation of H&S language in contracts Facilitate access of clinic and industrial hygienist to the workplace H&S training and infrastructure Can facilitate medical care insurance. Community‐based worker organizations Facilitate access to and communication among workers, union, employer and clinic Help build trust among workers who otherwise may not feel comfortable with union or clinic Expertise in housing, immigration, cultural, other social issuesnot typically addressed by unions Occupational Medicine Clinic Medical care, clinical evaluations, identification of work related illnesses Facilitate safe return to work, protection of co‐workers Referrals to specialists and primary care Assistance obtaining Workers’ Compensation in appropriate c4a4ses.
Conclusions Find locally feasible ways to help vulnerable workers and address WR, non‐WR, and interacting causes of illness and injury Help keep people working by preventing disease, disability with emphasis on safe RTW, ie, avoid enabling premature RTW while sick or injured or before workplace hazards are adequately controlled Try to implement preventive interventions as much as possible When primary prevention fails, appropriate use of Workers’ Compensation to help support patients during medical leaves necessary for effective treatment and recovery Collaborative programs with unions and worker centers Participatory Preventive Intervention programs with workers, unions, worker centers and proactive employers to improve workplace H&S Collaborate with primary care, emergency and subspecialty clinicians to jointly care for their patients with WRIs Find ways to include occupational health studies in collaborative clinical and public health research projects 45
103 References
OSHA definition of work‐relatedness https://www.osha.gov/laws‐ regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.5 Ottman, R. Prev Med. 1996; Gene–Environment Interaction: Definitions and Study Designs 25(6): 764–770. Rothman K, Greenland S, Lash T. Modern Epidemiology (2008) Markowitz S, Levin S, et al. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2013. Asbestos, asbestosis, smoking and lung cancer.
46
Q1 In addition to an Occupational Health Clinic / University, all of the following are generally part of an effective participatory workplace preventive intervention program except:
1) An employer 2) A Community Organization and / or Union 3) Federal or state OSHA 4) Individual workers
Q2 A 66 year old man is referred to you by a local pulmonologist who has diagnosed him with late stage metastatic lung cancer. He has a 35 PY cigarette smoking history and quit 10 years ago when he was diagnosed with pulmonary fibrosis with calcified pleural plaques. He has never been screened for lung cancer. He tells you he had worked from 1987 to 1996 for a small home improvement company that frequently did unlicensed weekend asbestos abatement jobs. He was provided with paper dust masks and gloves and there often was no ventilation system at the jobs. The company was fined several times and work stopped by OSHA for violating the asbestos standard. They finally went out of business in 1996 and he has worked loading trucks for a lumber distributor since then. Which is the best way to think about the probable (ie, “more probable than not”) cause(s) of his lung cancer? 1) Asbestos was the probable cause of his lung cancer. 2) Depending on doses, either smoking or asbestos exposure but not both could be the probable cause of his lung cancer. 3) Smoking and asbestos exposure could both simultaneously be probable causes of his lung cancer. 4) Failure to screen him with low dose CT was the probable cause of his lung cancer.
104 Q3 A woman food preparation worker developed nocturnal pain and paresthesias in her left index and middle fingers during the one year period after she began a new job requiring forceful repetitive grasp and wrist flexion of her left hand for several hours each day preparing food at work. She also complained of a great deal of psychological stress and gained 30 pounds during that period. Her BMI increased from 28.2 to 33.1 and electrodiagnostic testing confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome in her left hand but not her right hand. Assume that the multiple reviews of forceful repetitive wrist flexion and obesity in CTS can be interpreted as supporting a causal relationship between each of these two risk factors and CTS. Which intervention would be most likely to reduce the chances of the worker developing CTS during that year? 1) Modification of her work ergonomics to prevent forceful repetitive wrist flexion or avoidance of the 30 pound weight gain or both together but we do not know which in this particular patient. 2) Avoidance of the 30 pound weight gain but not modification of her work ergonomics. 3) Modification of her work ergonomics but not avoidance of the 30 pound weight gain. 4) Either intervention alone.
105 106 INDIGENOUS (NATIVE) LATIN AMERICAN IMMIGRANTS: among the most vulnerable workers
Leoncio Vasquez Santos Seth M. Holmes, PhD, MD
Faculty Disclosure
We have nothing to disclose
Indigenous Population in the Americas
Mexico 15.7 millions 15% Peru 13.8 millions 45% Bolivia 6.0 millions 55% Guatemala 5.8 millions 40% United States 5.2 millions 1.7% Ecuador 3.4 millions 25% Chile 1.9 millions 11% Canada 1.4 millions 4.3%
107 Indigenous Languages in Oaxaca Spanish Chontal Zapoteco Mazateco Mixteco Chinanteco Triqui Cuicateco Chatino Amusgos Serrano Huave Mixe Techuantepecano Netzichu Zoque
Indigenous History
• The 16 ethnic communities of Oaxaca are part of the Mesoamerican Pre- Hispanic Cultures. • Social & Political Organization:
o City States governed by royal lineages o Hierarchical social structure o Advance forms of art, literature, math, cosmology o Close relationship with nature o Practice of traditional medicine
• Indigenous People face stigma & discrimination even in Mexico.
108 Montealban
Indigenous Culture
• Written Language
o Mixtec Codex kept 1,000 years of history o Only nine Codex remained
• Oral tradition is predominant in the indigenous communities
Millenary Cultural Traditions • El Tequio • Offering ceremonies to the rain God to ask for good harvest. • Guelaguetza • Fiestas Patronales • Día de los Muertos • Traditional Medicine
109 Indigenous Medicine Common Beliefs and Practices ● Traditional Medicine Approaches: ● Herbolaria: Use of medicinal plants/herbs. ● Midwives: Treatment during pregnancy. ● Hueseros: Treatment for bone problems ● Sobadores: Treatment for muscle pain / sprains ● Spiritual Guides: Spiritual realm of supra-natural conditions
Migration to the U.S.
Mexican Migration Pattern
Mexico: (Always) • Veracruz • Distrito Federal • Sinaloa • Baja California Norte/Sur
United States: (’80s) • California • Washington State • Oregon • Florida • New York • North Carolina
110 Migration to U.S.
• 1960s & 1970s: First indigenous families arrived with the Bracero Program
• 1980s: Begins Massive Migration o Early ’80’s: Only Men o After IRCA (1986): Increased in the number of whole families • 1990: U.S. Census registers one Mixtec family
• 1991: The California Institute for Rural Studies conducted a research and found that 50,000 indigenous migrants worked in the fields of California.
• 2008-2009: The “Indigenous Farmworker Study” estimates that number of indigenous persons working in the agriculture sector in California is 120,000 and it reaches 165,000 when children are included. (Mines et al., 2010)
Estimate: 120,000 in CA Farmworker Families + 45,000 Children
Challenges Facing Indigenous Migrants
Racial Hierarchy • Racism & Prejudice (stereotypes) • “No seas indio!” Class Exploitation • Worse paid jobs for newcomers • “They like to work bent over.” Cultural and Language Barriers • Language not dialect • The glorious past vs. the harsh present • The politics of cultural difference
111 Conditions of Indigenous Migrants in the U.S.
• They perform the most physical demanded and less rewarded jobs (farm work and construction)
o They are exposed to pesticides, long working hours, no toilets with water to wash hands and drinking water. • They earn the minimum wage and too often below the minimum wage
• Zabin and others (1993) found that Mixtec workers were more likely to accept jobs paying less than the minimum wage and were more likely to be victims of non-payment and other law violations.
Living Conditions
Living Conditions
• It is common to find two bedroom apartments with two or three families (15 people).
• Many live in caves, around the rivers, mountains and under the orchard trees.
112 Living Conditions
Living and Working Conditions
Immigration, Identity and Social Networks
• Informal Village Networks
• Formalization of Social Networks.
• Institutionalization of collective practices (political, social, economic and religious).
• Emergence of a subjective collective belief of membership and belonging.
113 Structural Competency
“A shift in medical education … toward attention to forces that influence health outcomes at levels above individual interactions.” –Metzl and Hansen 2014
The capacity for health professionals to recognize and respond to health and illness as the downstream effects of broad social, political, and economic structures.
Structural Competency
Develop trainees’ capacity in:
1. Recognizing the influences of structures on patient health 2. Recognizing the influences of structures on the clinical encounter 3. Responding to the influences of structures in the clinic 4. Responding to the influences of structures beyond the clinic 5. Structural humility
Social Structures
● The policies, economic systems, and other institutions (judicial system, schools, etc.) that have produced and maintain contemporary social inequities and health disparities, often along the lines of social categories such as race, class, gender, and sexuality.
114 Structural Violence
● “Structural violence is one way of describing social arrangements that put individuals and populations in harm’s way... The arrangements are structural because they are embedded in the political and economic organization of our social world; they are violent because they cause injury to people.”
– Farmer et al. 2006
Structural Vulnerability
● The risk that an individual experiences as a result of structural violence – including their location in multiple socioeconomic hierarchies. Structural vulnerability is not caused by, nor can it be repaired solely by, individual agency or behaviors.
115 Metzl and Roberts,
“We argue that, if stigmas are not primarily produced in individual encounters but are enacted there due to structural causes, it then follows that clinical training must shift its gaze from an exclusive focus on the individual encounter to include the organization of institutions and policies, as well as of neighborhoods and cities, if clinicians are to impact stigma-related health inequalities.”
116 Research shows:
• SC is effective in shifting student perceptions of disease etiology o Before SC Training: genetics, behavior, culture o Post-SC Training: poverty, racism, harmful policies, unequal resources • Trainees indicate increased empathy and solidarity with patients
Case One
“Mr. Martinez is a 28 year-old male found down and intoxicated, possible aspiration pneumonia. He's a frequent flyer with many similar presentations but no history of alcohol withdrawal seizures. Nothing to do. If he's agitated assess for withdrawal and start the withdrawal protocol.”
In Emergency Begins Drinking Department After Gets Assaulted More Heavily Found on the Street
Standard Medical History & Default Provider Interpretation Begins Working Injury, Can’t Pay Rent, as Day Laborer Can’t Work Moves to Street
Moves to San Influx of Cheap US 4th Generation Francisco Corn; Can’t Make Corn Farmer in a Living Oaxaca
117 In Emergency Begins Drinking Department After Gets Assaulted More Heavily Found on the Street City policies Punitive US immigration contributing to high Policy/Discrimination rents & displacement
Begins Working Injury, Can’t Pay Rent, Systematic as Day Laborer Can’t Work Moves to Street marginalization of and violence against indigenous North American Free communities in Racialized low-wage Trade Agreement S. Mexico labor markets No Health Insurance (NAFTA) (excluded from ACA) Moves to San Influx of Cheap US 4th Generation Francisco Corn; Can’t Make a Corn Farmer in Living Oaxaca
In Emergency Begins Drinking Department After Gets Assaulted More Heavily Found on the Street
Standard Medical History & Default Provider Interpretation Begins Working Injury, Can’t Pay Rent, as Day Laborer Can’t Work Moves to Street
Moves to San Influx of Cheap US 4th Generation Francisco Corn; Can’t Make a Corn Farmer in Living Oaxaca
Naturalizing Inequality
• The sometimes subtle, sometimes explicit, ways in which structural violence is erased and elided by claims of cultural difference, genetic variance, behavioral shortcomings, or racial categories. • “Noncompliant” “Lost to follow-up” “Frequent flyer” • The “Culture of Poverty” (usually poor communities of color) • “Risk factors” as decontextualized, objective, apolitical realities
118 In Emergency Begins Drinking Department After Gets Assaulted Found on the Street More Heavily City policies US immigration contributing to high Policy/Discrimination rents & displacement
Begins Working Injury, Can’t Pay Rent, as Day Laborer Can’t Work Moves to Street
North American Free Trade Agreement No Health Insurance (NAFTA)
Moves to San Influx of Cheap US 4th Generation Francisco Corn; Can’t Make Corn Farmer in a Living Oaxaca
Possibilities for Change
● How can we intervene on the structures affecting health and health care?
Levels of Intervention
1. Intrapersonal 2. Interpersonal 3. Clinic 4. Community 5. Research 6. Policy
119 Educate yourself and work against implicit and explicit racism and other Intrapersonal bias In Emergency Department After Found on Street Approach the patient without blame Interpersonal or judgment Begins Drinking More Heavily Use an interpreter Clinic Gets Assaulted
Can’t Pay Rent, Moves to Advocate for safe spaces for Community Street community members Injury, Can’t Work Research the structural forces that Begins Working as Day affect the lives and health of migrants Research Laborer who work as day laborers, including policy and racism in your research Moves to San Francisco questions and discussion Influx of Cheap U.S. Corn Advocate for more just housing Fourth Generation Corn policy Farmer in Oaxaca Policy Organize against trade agreements that contribute to the exploitation of foreign labor
Q1: Structural competency is defined as?
A. The capacity for health professionals to recognize and respond to health and illness as the downstream effects of broad social, political and economic structures B. The ability to interact effectively and respectfully with people of different cultures C. Coordinated care to individuals with multiple chronic health conditions, including mental health and substance use disorders D. The ability to navigate the institutions of health care effectively and efficiently
Q2: Compared to the general Latin American immigrant population, what are additional risk factors that indigenous Latin American Immigrants face?
A. Immigration status B. Racism C. Preferred language is assumed to be Spanish D. This is an understudied population
120 Q3: What can health professionals do to better serve indigenous Latin American immigrants?
A. Assume all Latin American immigrants the same and face the same experiences, thus being prepared to respond B. Research and seek to understand the unique circumstances that impact this population C. Interact with them the same way you would any other patient D. Learn Spanish
References
● Mines, R., Nichols, S., & Runsten, D. (2010). California’s Indigenous Farmworkers: Final Report of the Indigenous Farmworker Study (IFS) to the California Endowment. Retrieved at http://www.indigenousfarmworkers.org ● Metzl, J. M. (2010). The protest psychosis: How schizophrenia became a black disease. Beacon Press. ● Metzl, J. M., & Hansen, H. (2014). Structural competency: Theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 126-133. ● Haldol advertisement. (1974). Archives of General Psychiatry. ● Farmer, P. E., Nizeye, B., Stulac, S., & Keshavjee, S. (2006). Structural violence and clinical medicine. PLoS medicine, 3(10), e449.
121 122 An Aging Population at Work and at Play Vocations, Avocations, and Hobbies
Ware Kuschner, M.D. VA Palo Alto Health Care System Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto, California
Faculty disclosure
I have nothing to disclose.
An aging population at work and at play 1) The aging population
2) Normal aging
3) Abnormal (but not atypical) aging: common health conditions that afflict older adults
4) The aging workforce: challenges and opportunities
5) The older adult at play: staying healthy and having fun
123 WHO ‐ World report on ageing and health 2015 International Day of Older Persons ‐ ‐ October 1, 2015
• “ ...the number of people over the age of 60 is expected to double by 2050 and [this] will require radical societal change.”
• “Today, most people, even in the poorest countries, are living longer lives,”
Longer lives, but not necessarily healthier lives • “[There is] very little evidence that the added years of life are being experienced in better health than was the case for previous generations at the same age.”
• “Unfortunately, 70 does not yet appear to be the new 60. But it could be. And it should be”.
U.S. demographic shift
By 2030, all baby boomers will be older than age 65 1 in 5 residents will be retirement age
By 2035, older people will outnumber children: 78 million > 65 years old vs. 77 million < 18 years old
U.S. Census Bureau’s 2017 National Population Projections
U.S. Population: 1960 vs. 2060 United States Census Bureau National Population Projections, 2017 www.census.gov/programs‐ surveys/popproj.html
124 Percentage of U.S. Population in Selected Age Groups, 1960 to 2060
Population Reference Bureau analysis of data from the U.S. Census Bureau
Aging in the United States Positive Developments Education levels are increasing among people ages 65 and older • 1965: 5% had a bachelor’s degree or more 2015: 27%
Life expectancy has increased ‐ mostly due to the reduction in mortality at older ages • 1950: 68 years 2018: 79 years
Poverty rate dropped sharply for Americans ages 65 and older • 1966: 30% 2017: 9%
Aging in the United States Population Reference Bureau https://assets.prb.org/pdf16/aging‐us‐population‐bulletin.pdf and U.S. Census Bureau and Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
2017 Profile of older Americans
Challenges • Wide economic disparities across different population subgroups among adults ages 65 and older: Living below the poverty line in 2016: 17% of Latinos and 19% of African Americans vs. 7% of non‐Hispanic whites • Increased numbers of Americans living with Alzheimer’s disease and other chronic diseases • Rising obesity (BMI > 30) rates among older adults: 40% of men and 43% of women who are 65‐to‐74‐year‐old 2017 Profile of Older Americans, The Administration for Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
125 2017 Profile of older Americans
Challenges
• 35% of persons over age 65 report a disability • Increased demand for nursing home care and elder care • 22% of adults over age 85 require help with personal care • Increased Social Security and Medicare expenditures as percentage of GDP
Normal aging
Brain and cognitive function Processing speed – declines beginning in the 3rd decade the speed with which cognitive activities are performed the speed of motor responses
Attention ‐ ‐ the ability to concentrate and focus on specific stimuli declines with age Selective attention – ability to focus on specific information in the environment while ignoring irrelevant information; e.g. conversation while driving a car Divided attention – focus on multiple tasks simultaneously; talking to someone while typing
Normal aging
Memory ‐ stable with age • Recognition memory – able to retrieve information when given a cue; e.g., correctly giving details of a story when given yes/no questions
• Temporal order memory – recalling the sequence of past events; e.g. a week ago, had lunch then went to grocery store
• Procedural memory – e.g., how to ride a bike
126 Normal aging
Memory ‐ declines with age • Delayed free recall – retrieving information without a cue; e.g. recalling a grocery list
• Source memory – recalling the source of learned information; e.g., T.V. vs. newspaper vs. friend
• Prospective memory – remembering to perform actions in the future e.g., take medicine before going to bed
Normal aging
Executive Functioning ‐ defined • Ability to engage in independent, appropriate, purposive, and self‐serving behavior • Includes a wide range of cognitive abilities • Self monitor • Plan • Organize • Reason • Be mentally flexible • Solve problems
Normal aging
Executive function: dimensions that are stable throughout life • Ability to appreciate similarities
• Describe the meaning of proverbs
• Reason about familiar material
127 Normal aging
Executive function: dimensions that decline with aging • Concept formation, abstraction, and mental flexibility decline with age, especially after age 70
• Inductive reasoning as measured by verbal and mathematic reasoning tasks decline, beginning around age 45
Normal aging
Cardiovascular system • Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
• Increased left ventricular wall thickness and stiffness decreased relaxation of heart
• Blood vessels stiffen afterload increases
• Decreased maximum predicted heart rate: 220 minus age in years
Normal aging
Lungs • Lung function begins to decline ~ age 25 • Alveolar ducts enlarge, ~ 1/3 of the surface area lost over the life span • Diffusion capacity decreases about 5% per decade • Worsened ventilation‐perfusion mismatching resulting in declining PaO2 with age
• Decreased FEV1 by 200 – 300 ml per decade with steeper declines in 7th and 8th decades
128 Normal aging
Exercise capacity • 3 to 6 percent decrease in peak aerobic capacity per decade in the 30s and • more than 20 percent decrease in peak aerobic capacity per decade in the 70s and beyond • Endurance training may mitigate the rate of decline before age 60
NIH National Institute on Aging Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
Normal aging
Body composition and musculoskeletal changes • Decreased lean body mass
• Bone mineral loss
• Decreased joint elasticity
Normal aging
The 5 senses • Eyes: Presbyopia, diminished pupillary reflexes glare, decreased acuity, loss of color perception, worsened night vision
• Ears: loss of high frequency hearing diminished speech recognition
• Touch: diminished sensory perception to both touch and low frequency vibration, especially in the lower extremities
• Smell & Taste: diminished smell diminished taste
129 Normal aging
Skin • Atrophy • Decreased elasticity • Dermis thins • Increase fragility to shear stress • Delayed wound healing
Diseases of aging (percentage of Americans over 65 yrs with selected conditions)
• Dementia (including Alzheimer’s disease – 11%) • Cardiovascular (37% of men; 26% of women) • Arthritis (50%) • Diabetes (25% ‐ diagnosed and undiagnosed) • Poor oral health (25% have no natural teeth) • Cataracts and age‐related macular degeneration • Parkinson’s disease
Source: CDC
Diseases and disorders of aging
• Cancer: lung, breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic, skin 413,885 deaths in 2014 among people over age 65 – 2nd leading cause • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (10% of men; 13% of women) • Falls 2.5 million people over 65 treated annually in the ED • Depression (15 ‐20% have experience depression) • Impaired immunity, shingles, pneumonia • Hearing loss • Urinary incontinence
130 Frailty
Frailty is . . . a syndrome of physiological decline in late life, characterized by marked vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. Frail older adults are less able to adapt to stressors such as acute illness or trauma than younger or non‐frail older adults. This increased vulnerability contributes to increased risk for multiple adverse outcomes, including procedural complications, falls, institutionalization, disability, and death. Increasingly, frailty in older patients is considered the hallmark geriatric syndrome and a forerunner to many other geriatric syndromes, including falls, fractures, delirium, and incontinence. UpToDate
Frailty screening tool
F R A I L F atigue ("Are you fatigued?") R esistance ("Can you climb one flight of stairs?") A mbulation ("Can you walk one block?") I llnesses (greater than five) L oss of weight (greater than 5 percent in last year)
Scale: 0 = robust, 1‐ 2 = pre‐frailty, > = frailty
Woo J. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015
The public health burden of frailty
• In a European study (the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe [SHARE]) frailty prevalence ranged from 6 to 44 percent when applied to a database of individuals aged 50 to 104 years Theou O. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013. • In the United States, frailty ranges from 4 to 16 percent in men and women aged 65 and older. Pre‐frailty has a prevalence ranging from 28 to 44 percent in several studies. Cawthon PM. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007. Woods NF. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005.
131 The aging workforce
Americans are working longer Americans 65 yrs and older who worked: 2000: 12.5% 2017: 19%
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
The aging workforce
The number of older workers is growing Projection in growth of labor force, annually, 2016 – 2016 Overall: 0.6% 65 – 74: 4.2% 75 and older: 6.7%
America’s Aging Workforce: Opportunities and Challenges Special Committee on Aging, United States Senate December 2017
Labor Force Participation Rate by Age Bureau of Labor Statistics
132 America’s Aging Workforce
Many older workers are struggling to prepare financially for retirement. Roughly one‐third of workers do not have access to a retirement plan at work, and many aging workers have not saved enough for retirement and may continue to work beyond when they intended to retire out of financial need.
Work is linked with improved health and well‐being. For many aging Americans, work provides a sense of purpose. Research consistently links work with improved physical, emotional, and cognitive health, financial stability and security, and quality of life.
America’s Aging Workforce: Opportunities and Challenges. A report of the Special Committee on Aging, United States Senate, Dec. 6, 2017
The aging workforce
Current challenges make it more difficult for older workers to thrive in the workplace • Age discrimination • Inadequate training opportunities • Working while managing health conditions and disabilities • Balancing caregiving responsibilities with work
Health of the aging American – self‐described
Health is fair or poor • 18 – 44 yrs: 6% • 55 – 64 yrs : 19% • 65 and older: 22% Two or more chronic health conditions • 18 – 44 yrs: 7% • 55 – 64 yrs: 40% • 65 and older: 62% U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Health, United States, 2016,” 2017, at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus16.pdf#045
133 Health of the aging American
Have a disability • 18 – 34 yrs: 6% • 35 to 64 yrs: 13% • 65 to 74 yrs: 25% • 75 and above: 50%
U.S. Census Bureau. “American Community Survey 2015” 2015, at https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_15_1YR_S1810 &prodType=table.
Health of the aging American
Among individuals ages 65 and above with disabilities • difficulty walking or climbing stairs – 67% • difficulties with hearing – 40% • cognition – 29 % • vision – 19%
Wan He and Luke Larsen, “Older Americans With a Disability: 2008‐2012,” National Institute on Aging and US Census Bureau, 2014, at https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/acs/acs‐ 29.pdf.
Income loss with a disability
Percentage of full‐time workers below the ages of 50 – 64 earning less than 200% of the federal poverty line ‐ With a disability: 17% Without a disability: 10%
Harriet Komisar, Donald Redfoot, and Carlos Figueiredo, “Disability and Employment,” AARP Public Policy Institute, 2014, at http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2014‐10/disability‐and‐employment‐fact‐ sheet‐aarp.pdf.
134 Center for Strategic and International Studies Global Aging Initiative
How can aging societies maintain a decent standard of living for the old without imposing a crushing burden on the young? How will economic performance be affected as rates of savings and investment decline and workforces contract and gray? How will the changing structure of the family (which will often have more grandparents than grandchildren) affect the way we raise the young and care for the old? How will the rising average age of the population affect risk‐taking, entrepreneurship, and voter and leadership behavior? How is the differential impact of global aging, by country and by region, likely to transform the geopolitical landscape and the global balance of power?
Age discrimination / mandatory retirement
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967, outlawed forced retirement based on age . . . but . . . Congress has approved fixed retirement ages for some professions involved with public safety: • commercial airline pilot (65 years) • Federal Bureau of Investigation agent (57 years) • National Park Ranger (57 years) • air traffic controller (56 years) • lighthouse operator (55 years) but not for physicians. Mandatory retirement for surgeons does exist in some countries, such as Russia and China (in both countries, age 60 years for men and 55 years for women).
Assessing the performance of aging surgeons
In 2017, 44.1% of 103,032 active surgeons in the United States were 55 years or older. In a study of nearly 900,000 Medicare beneficiaries, patients who had operations performed by older surgeons (older than 50‐59 years and ≥60 years) had lower mortality than patients who had operations performed by younger surgeons. Another study examined the files of 461,000 Medicare patients . . . when compared with surgeons ages 41‐50 years, surgeons older than 60 years had higher operative mortality rates for pancreatectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, and carotid endarterectomy. However, the difference in outcomes was small and limited to surgeons having low procedure volumes.
JAMA Viewpoint January 14, 2019 Assessing the performance of aging surgeons Katlic, MR. JAMA. 2019;321(5):449‐450
135 Assessing the performance of aging surgeons
American College of Surgeons recommends: • Voluntary physical examination, eye examination, and online screening tests of cognition for surgeons starting at age 65 – 70. • Regular interval reevaluation thereafter is prudent for those without identifiable issues on the index examination.
National Center for Productive Aging and Work
• Established at NIOSH in October, 2015 • Traditional occupational safety and health protection programs have primarily concentrated on ensuring that work is safe and that workers are protected from the harms that arise from work itself. • Total Worker Health (TWH) builds on this approach through the recognition that work is a social determinant of health; job‐related factors such as wages, hours of work, workload and stress levels, interactions with coworkers and supervisors, access to paid leave, and health‐promoting workplaces all can have an important impact on the well‐being of workers, their families, and their communities.
NIOSH – Productive aging and work
Safety and Health Outcomes Associated with Aging and Work • Workers who are older tend to experience fewer workplace injuries than their younger colleagues. • However, older workers often require more time to heal, underscoring the need for a well‐planned return to work program.
136 Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Nonfatal Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Among Older Workers ‐‐‐ United States, 2009 April 29, 2011 / 60(16);503‐508 Editorial Note Accommodating older workers positively impacts the entire workforce. For example, employer efforts to reduce fall risks for older workers, such as ensuring walkways are well‐lit, removing slipping and tripping hazards, and use of more slip‐resistant floors, will improve the safety of all workers.
Health Benefits Associated With Regular Physical Activity US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 2018 https://health.gov/paguidelines/second‐edition/pdf/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf All adults ‐ ‐ and older adults • Lower risk of all‐cause mortality • Lower risk of cardiovascular disease mortality • Lower risk of cardiovascular morbiditiy (including heart disease and stroke) • Lower risk of hypertension • Lower risk of type 2 diabetes • Lower risk of adverse blood lipid profile • Lower risk of cancers of the bladder, breast, colon, endometrium, esophagus, kidney, lung, and stomach Note: The Advisory Committee rated the evidence of health benefits of physical activity as strong, moderate, limited, or grade not assignable. Only outcomes with strong or moderate evidence of effect are included in this list.
Health Benefits Associated With Regular Physical Activity
• Improved bone health • Improved physical function • Lower risk of falls (older adults) • Lower risk of fall‐related injuries (older adults) • Reduced anxiety • Reduced risk of depression • Improved sleep
137 Health Benefits Associated With Regular Physical Activity
• Slowed or reduced weight gain, prevention of weight gain following initial weight loss, +/‐ weight loss, • Improved cognition (executive function, attention, memory, processing speed) * • Reduced risk of dementia (including Alzheimer’s disease) * • Improved quality of life
* some literature suggests no benefit
Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
Some physical activity is better than none. For substantial health benefits, adults should do at least: 2 hours and 30 minutes a week of moderate‐intensity, or 75 minutes vigorous intensity exercise per week
Adults should also do muscle‐strengthening activities of moderate or greater intensity and that involve all major muscle groups on 2 or more days a week
Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans
And for adults 65 yrs and older As part of their weekly physical activity, older adults should also do physical activity that includes balance training.
138 Recreational injuries among older Americans, 2001 Gerson LW. Injury Prevention 2004.
• In 2001, an estimated 62,164 persons ≥65 years old were treated in emergency departments for injuries sustained while participating in sport or recreational activities. • The overall injury rate was 177.3/100 000 population with higher rates for men (242.5/100 000) than for women (151.3/100 000). • “Exercising” caused 30% of injuries among women and bicycling caused 17% of injuries among men. • 27% of all treated injuries were fractures and women (34%) were more likely than men (21%) to suffer fractures.
Hobbies – and the respiratory system
• The home environment – where people spend as much as 50% of their life during their working life and likely much more during retirement – can affect the health and well being of the older adult • A diverse array of home‐based and leisure activities may generate hazardous respirable exposures. • Routine domestic activities such as cooking and cleaning, and a variety of hobbies have been associated with a spectrum of respiratory tract disorders, including acute irritation or lung injury, rhinitis, and asthma.
Respiratory Hobby Exposure Comments Health Effects
Sensitization – eye, skin, Wood dust Varies across species Wood working respiratory tract Metal fume fever, Welding Galvanized metal Metal work acute lung injury Ceramics Irritant gas exposure Irritation Kiln fumes Automotive spray Diisocyanates Bronchospasm Painting painting
Adapted from Ho. Clin Chest Med. 2012.
139 Don’t Ruin My Life — Aging and Driving in the 21st Century Aronson L. N Engl J Med. 2019
Approach to the Older Driver Key Facts • Driving is a sociomedical issue akin to sex and substance use. • Most older drivers are safe drivers, with few risky driving behaviors. • In accidents, older adults are at higher risk for injury and death. • Driving retirement will be necessary for most of us as we age. • As with younger drivers, some older drivers will be able to resume driving after treatment for relevant medical conditions.
Don’t Ruin My Life — Aging and Driving in the 21st Century Louise Aronson, M.D. February 21, 2019 N Engl J Med 2019; 380:705‐707 • History – ask about • Driving as part of routine health maintenance beginning at 60 yrof age • Driving specifics such as difficulty with turns, turn signals, parking, staying in lane, reversing, following traffic signs, maintaining usual speeds • Transportation and other mobility needs and alternatives • Neither self‐report nor report from family is always reliable
Q1. Normal aging is characterized by:
1) Stable temporal order memory 2) Stable visual acuity and stable hearing 3) A progressive decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction from >55% to 45% beginning at around age 65 and continuing until about age 85 4) A decline in inductive reasoning as measured by verbal and mathematic reasoning tasks beginning around age 70
140 Q2. Which of the following statements is true?
1) The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 has outlawed the forced retirement of workers based on age across all occupations in the United States without exception. 2) 60% of Americans over the age of 65 self characterize their health as either fair or poor. 3) Hearing loss is the most common self‐reported disability among Americans over the age of 65. 4) Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses are less common among older workers (age > 55) compared with younger workers.
Q3. Which statement is true?
• Adults with chronic conditions or disabilities, who are able, should aim to do 75 to 150 minutes a week of moderate‐intensity aerobic physical activity. • All of the key guidelines for “adults” regarding aerobic and muscle‐ strengthening activities apply to “older adults”; and older adults should also incorporate balance training into their training regimen. • Bicycling, golfing, and fishing account for just over half of all recreational injuries among men over the age of 65 • Asthma attributable to diisocyanates typically results form a one time high intensity unintended exposure after a mishap involving paint.
141 An Aging Population at Work and at Play – Vocations, Avocations, and Hobbies
Ware Kuschner, M.D.
Bibliography
Aronson L. Don't ruin my life - aging and driving in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 2019;380:705-707.
Bohle P. Time to call it quits? The safety and health of older workers. Int J Health Serv 2010;40:23-41.
Clegg A. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013; 381:752-762.
Gerson LW. Recreational injuries among older Americans, 2001. Inj Prev 2004;10:134-8.
Harada CN. Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29:737-752.
Ho LA. Kuschner WG. Respiratory health in home and leisure pursuits. Clin Chest Med 2012;33:715-29.
Katlic MR. Assessing the performance of aging surgeons. JAMA 2019;321:449-450.
Mather M. Aging in the United States. Population Reference Bureau December, 2015; Vol. 70, No. 2. Available at: https://assets.prb.org/pdf16/aging-us-population-bulletin.pdf Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses among older workers --- United States, 2009 April 29, 2011 / 60(16);503-508. NIOSH. Total Worker Health. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/twh/totalhealth.html Sattelmair JR. Effects of physical activity on cardiovascular and noncardiovascular outcomes in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 2009;25:677-702. Special Committee on Aging - United States Senate. America’s Aging Workforce: Opportunities and Challenges; December 2017. Available at: https://www.aging.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Aging%20Workforce%20Report%20FINAL.pdf US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd edition, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 2018 https://health.gov/paguidelines/second- edition/pdf/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf Wan H. Older Americans with a disability: 2008-2012,” National Institute on Aging and US Census Bureau, 2014, available at: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/acs/acs-29.pdf. White MS. The impact of an aging population in the workplace. Workplace Health Saf 2018;66:493-498.
142 Military Service is a Vulnerable Occupation: Lung Disease as a Paradigm
Michael J. Falvo, PhD Research Physiologist, VA War Related Illness & Injury Study Center – Airborne Hazards and Burn Pits Center of Excellence Assistant Professor, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
1
Disclosure
• I have nothing to disclose
• Contents of this presentation do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government
Deployment‐Related Exposures
Agent Nerve Anti‐ Solvents Orange Agent Malarial
Dust & Fuels Pesticides Radiation Sand
Depleted Oil Well Vaccines Burn Pits Uranium Fires
143 Mean PM2.5 Concentration (06‐07) 15μg/m3 35μg/m3
Redrawn from: Engelbrecht et al. 2008
Non‐Inhalational Exposure
Figure from Cernak and Noble‐Haeusslein 2010, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
144 Uniquely Vulnerable, Susceptible?
Falvo et al., 2015, Epidemiologic Rev
Epidemiologic Findings
• 15 epidemiologic studies (2005 – present) • Relationship to deployment? – Respiratory Symptoms: 9 studies, favorable – Asthma: 10 studies, mixed results – COPD: 7 studies, largely null – Other Outcomes: 6 studies, inconclusive • Limitations
↑ Chronic Lung Disease
3.50% 25000
3.00% 20000 2.50%
15000 2.00%
1.50% 10000 Prevalence (%) 1.00% No. of Veterans 5000 0.50%
0.00% 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Asthma COPD Redrawn from: Pugh et al. 2016 Mil Med ILD
145 Clinical Findings
• 18 clinical studies (2004 – present) – 4 Case reports/series – 5 Retrospective chart reviews – 2 Pre‐deployment evaluations – 6 Post‐deployment evaluations – 1 Pre‐ and post‐deployment evaluation • Main findings – Dyspnea….still complicated
% Preserved Spirometry 100% Morris et al. 95% (n=50), 84% Krefft et al. 90% (n=28), 82%
85% Falvo et al. (n=143), 75% 80%
75%
70%
65% Butzko et al. Holley et al. (n=178), 72% (n=267), 64% 60%
55%
50%
National VA Post‐Deployment Health Resource (Public Law 105‐368)
146 WRIISC AHBPCE
• Increased reports of airborne hazards exposure 2007 and concerns (Helmer et al. 2007) • Working Group at National Jewish publishes 2010 recommendations (Rose et al. 2010)
• Full PFTs on all referrals 2011 • Expanded cardiopulmonary evaluations for 2013 Veterans with primary respiratory complaints • Airborne Hazards and Burn Pits Center of 2018 Excellence
NJ WRIISC Referral Cohort
110.00 Post‐9/11 100.00 Pre‐9/11
90.00
80.00 /FVC 1 70.00 FEV
60.00
50.00 n = 485 40.00
6.8 0.8
16.5 Normal Obstructed Restricted N = 485 Mixed
74.9
147 Preserved Spirometry
Age Sex 46.0 (37.0, 50.0) yrs 86.3% male
n = 364 Post‐Deploy Tobacco Pack Length Years 12.8 (7.3, 23.4) yrs 0.0 (0.0, 10.0)
Deployment‐Related Exposures 120
100
80
60
40
20
0 Burn Pits Air Pollution Sand/Dust Petrochem Blast Exposed Concerned
Lower Respiratory Symptoms (≥ 2d∙wk⁻¹)
Cough
Wheeze
Short of Breath
2+ Symp
0 102030405060
148 BD Reversibility
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00 +12%
5.00
BD %change 0.00 1 ‐5.00 FEV ‐10.00
‐15.00 n = 357
Isolated ↓ DLCO 150
130
110
90 (%predicted)
CO 70 DL
50 n = 349 30 HgB corrected; Miller et al. 1983 predicted
• * N = 123 – Preserved spirometry – Current smokers excluded
• Low DLCO
– DLCO ≤ LLN – Miller ’83 – HgB corrected
Falvo et al. 2018 Clin Resp J
149 Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT)
20 Hz 5 Hz
Figure from: Brashier & Salvi 2015
Resistance (Rrs) Reactance (Xrs)
R5 R20