Remarks and an Exchange with Reporters on North Korea June 22, 1994
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Administration of William J. Clinton, 1994 / June 22 best way to prove ourselves worthy of the legacy NOTE: The President spoke at 1:25 p.m. at the handed down by those who sacrificed in the Department of Veterans Affairs. In his remarks, Second World War, those who have worn our he referred to Garnett G. Shropshire, World War uniform since, and those who have been given II veteran, who introduced the President, and their just chance at the brass ring through the Hugo Mendoza, Persian Gulf war veteran. The bill of rights for the GI's. proclamation of June 21 on the 50th anniversary Thank you very much. of the GI bill of rights is listed in Appendix D at the end of this volume. Remarks and an Exchange With Reporters on North Korea June 22, 1994 The President. Good afternoon. Today I want will lead to the resolution of all the issues that to announce an important step forward in the divide Korea from the international community. situation in North Korea. This afternoon we In close consultation with our allies, we will have received formal confirmation from North continue as we have over the past year and Korea that it will freeze the major elements more to pursue our interests and our goals with of its nuclear program while a new round of steadiness, realism, and resolve. This approach talks between our nations proceeds. is paying off, and we will continue it. This is In response, we are informing the North Ko- good news. Our task now is to transform this reans that we are ready to go forward with a news into a lasting agreement. new round of talks in Geneva early next month. Q. Mr. President, are you going to try to North Korea has assured us that while we go insist on finding out whether or not they have forward with these talks it will not reload its already built a bomb and getting the facts on 5-megawatt reactor with new fuel or reprocess any past violations as part of these talks? spent fuel. We have also been assured that the The President. Well, let me say that, first of IAEA will be allowed to keep its inspectors and all, we have been in touch with the North Kore- monitoring equipment in place at the Yongbyon ans in New York almost at this moment. We nuclear facility, thus allowing verification of will set up these talks, and we will have ample North Korea's agreement. We welcome this very opportunity to discuss the range of issues that positive development which restores the basis will be discussed in the talks. And we expect for talks between North Korea and the United to discuss, obviously, all the issues that have States. divided us. In addition to addressing the nuclear issue, Yes, Helen [Helen Thomas, United Press we are prepared to discuss the full range of International]. security, political, and economic issues that af- Q. Mr. President, what concessions did we fects North Korea's relationship with the inter- make to bring this about? And why is it that national community. During these discussions you did not meet with President Carter face we will suspend our efforts to pursue a sanctions to face? Here's a man who actually met Kim resolution in the United Nations Security Coun- Il-song, one of the few; our profiles may not cil. We also welcome the agreement between jive and so forth. You would have had a great South Korea and North Korea to pursue a meet- chance to debrief him, and instead you talked ing between their Presidents. to him on the telephone. I would like to thank President Carter for The President. We talked to him for a long the important role he played in helping to time on the telephone. The only reason we achieve this step. These developments mark not didn't is because I didn't want to ask him to a solution to the problem, but they do mark come all the way up to Camp David, and we a new opportunity to find a solution. It is the had planned to go up there for the weekend. beginning of a new stage in our efforts to pursue And he decided and I decided there wasÐwe a nonnuclear Korean Peninsula. We hope this know each other very well; we've known each 1117 June 22 / Administration of William J. Clinton, 1994 other for 20 yearsÐwe decided we didn't need And so I think that we know what the facts to do it; we could just have a long talk on are. We know we pursued a firm course. We the phone, and that's what we did. know that President Carter went and made a Q. Did we make any concessionsÐÐ very persuasive case, and we know what the The President. No. North Koreans did. I don't think it's useful to Q. ÐÐto the North Koreans to bring this characterize this in terms of winners and losers. about? I think the world will be the winner if we can The President. No. The only thing that we resolve this. But we've not done it yet. said was that we would suspend our efforts to Brit [Brit Hume, ABC News]. pursue sanctions if there was a verifiable freeze Q. Mr. President, it would appear that Presi- on the nuclear program while the talks contin- dent Carter may have either seen something ued, which included no refueling of the reactor that perhaps you and others may not have seen and no reprocessing. as clearly as he did, or that perhaps this was When President Carter came back he saidÐ a more closely coordinated effort between you this was the cautionary note, you know, I raised and Mr. Carter than it may have appeared at in Chicago last Friday when I was asked to the time. Is either of those things correct? comment on this statementÐhe said that he The President. Well, I don't know that I believed that Kim Il-song had made that state- would characterize it in that way. He called ment to him. We said that we would wait for me; we talked about it. I wanted to make sure official confirmation. We received it today. That he had adequate briefings. I have alwaysÐI confirmation gives us the basis for resuming the have, as you probably know, I haveÐand I've talks. said this I believe publiclyÐI have sought other Yes, Rita [Rita Braver, CBS News]. means of personally communicating to Kim Il- Q. President Clinton, some of your aides are song that the desires of the United States and saying, ``We got everything we want here.'' Is the interests of the United States and the policy this one of those cases where the other guy of the United States was to pursue a nonnuclear blinked? Korean Peninsula and to give North Korea a The President. I don't think it's useful for way of moving with dignity into the international me to characterize it in that way. We know community and away from an isolated path, what the facts are. If you look at what we've which we found quite disturbing for all the rea- done over the last year and a half, we have sons that I've already said. followed basically a two-pronged policy. We It seemed to me that when President Carter have worked as hard as we could to be firm, expressed a willingness to go and they had given to be resolute, to bring our allies closer and him an invitation of some longstanding to come, closer together. And when I say our allies on that that gave us the opportunity to give North this issue, I consider not just South Korea and Korea a direct message to their leader from Japan but Russia and China to be our allies. a distinguished American citizen, without in any All of us have the same interests and the same way undermining the necessary and correct gov- desires. ernment-to-government contacts that we had We also always kept the door open. I always going on at other levels. said I did not seek a confrontation, I sought President Carter, I think, was very faithful to give North Korea a way to become a part in articulating the policy of our Government. of the international community. And I think that that provided a forum in which When President Carter was invited and ex- the North Korean leader, Kim Il-song, could pressed a willingness to go to North Korea, I respond as he did. And I'm very pleased about thought it gave us one opportunity that we it. would not otherwise have, with a private citizen, When we were called last Thursday and this but a distinguished American private citizen, to whole issue was discussed and we said what communicate the position of our administration we said about we hope that their message meant and to do itÐthe very fact that he went, I that they were willing to freeze their nuclear think, was a gesture of the importance that we program, then they said they were. Then we placed on resolving this matter and not just for got formal confirmation today of the definition ourselves but for the world. of ``freeze.'' Their definition was the same as 1118 Administration of William J. Clinton, 1994 / June 22 ours. We had the basis to go forward. I'm very The United States wants the NPT to be a happy about it.