J. Exp. Zool. India Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 183-187, 2019 www.connectjournals.com/jez ISSN 0972-0030 A STUDY ON THE OCCURRENCE OF LARVIVOROUS (PISCES) IN DOON VALLEY (UTTARAKHAND)

Shivani Farswan, R. K. Jauhari and N. Pemola Devi1 Department of Zoology, D.A.V.(P.G.) College, Dehradun - 248 001, India. 1Department of Zoology, D. B. S. (P.G.) College, Dehradun - 248 001, India. *e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] (Accepted 27 December 2018)

ABSTRACT : Use of Larvivorous fishes is the best medium in controlling immature mosquitoes and thereby in reducing spread of mosquito borne diseases. Several of fresh water fishes feed on immature stages of mosquito larvae and are of considerable value in controlling mosquito population. A study was conducted in Doon valley with an aim to document the larvivorous fauna. Study revealed the occurrence of 20 species of larvivorous fishes under 4 orders, 7 families and 15 genera. Categorization of fish was done as voracious feeder ( fasciata, Esomus danrica, Rasbora daniconius, Danio rerio, Gambusia affinis, Poecilia reticulata, Aphanius dispar and panchax), opportunistic feeder (Channa punctata, Channa gachua, Channa striata, Channa marulius, Mystus vittatus, Mystus tengara, Mystus seengtee and Amblypharyngodon mola) and moderate feeder (Barilius bendelisis, sophore, Pethia ticto and Devario devario) based on their feeding potential. Key words : Larvicorous fishes, Doon valley, mosquitoes.

INTRODUCTION Chatterjee (1963), Singh (1964), Grover (1969, 1970), Biological control refers to the introduction or Husain (1987), Kumar et al (1990), Grover et al (1994), manipulation of organisms to suppress vector population. Rauthan et al (2001, 2005), Husain (2003), Uniyal and A wide range of organisms help to regulate mosquito Kumar (2006), Uniyal and Mehta (2007) and Gupta and populations naturally through predation, parasitism and Rana (2009) added a lot on fishes of Doon Valley. Jauhari competition. As biological mosquito control agents, et al (1996) undertook studies on Larvivorous fish larvivorous fish (i.e., those that feed on immature stages occurring in water bodies of Doon Valley. Hence, on the of mosquitoes) are being used extensively all over the basis of available literature it can be very well said that world since the pre DDT era (Raghavendra and Subbarao, till date no systematic study on larvivorous fish from Doon 2002). Valley has been carried out. Henceforth, to fill up the void in existing knowledge on larvivorous fish diversity In India, mosquito fish (Gambusia affinis) and guppy in water bodies of Doon Valley, the present study is taken (Poecilia reticulata) have been successfully utilized as up. the mosquito biocontrol agent for a long time (Sharma, 1994; Rajnikant et al, 1996; Chatterjee and Chandra, Study area 1997) and Aplocheilus sp. has also been used for this The present study was carried out in the vicinity of purpose (Kumar et al, 1998; Manna et al, 2011) in several Doon Valley. Fish sampling was performed at river Song, cases. Earlier works (Rupp, 1996; Gratz et al, 1996; Suswa and Asan with the help of local fishermen using Morgan and Buttemer, 1996) have revealed the negative respective fishing nets. Exact fishing spots have been impacts of mosquito fish on non-target organisms and on depictive in Fig. 1. Fishes were also collected from local natural ecosystem too. Though a considerable work on fish market. larvivorous fish diversity has been carried out at different MATERIALS AND METHODS places in India (Rama Rao, 2014; Rao et al, 2015; Krishna Firstly, fishes were identified on the basis of et al, 2016; Rao et al, 2017; Gupta et al, 2018). morphometric and meristematic characters and by using In the past, from Doon valley the earlier work on keys and catalogues. The orders have been arranged larvivorous fish was carried out by Hora and Mukerjee phylogenetically and species under a followed (1936). Later on after 3 decades, Das (1960), Lal and 184 Shivani Farswan et al

Fig. 1 : Study area (Doon valley) showing fish sampling spots. alphabetic sequence. The correct scientific name, common mola (Hamilton, 1822), Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton, name and vernacular name based on IUCN and CAMP 1822), Devario devario (Hamilton, 1822), Danio rerio status are shown against each species. Guppies or Poecilia (Hamilton, 1822), Barilius bendelisis (Hamilton, 1807), sp. were procured from National Institute of Malaria Puntius sophore (Hamilton, 1822), Pethia ticto Research’s based field station at Haridwar (Uttarakhand). (Hamilton, 1822), Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, The fishes were acclimatized to laboratory conditions and 1853), Poecilia reticulata (Peters, 1859), Aphanius were supplied with commercial feed. The fish used in the dispar (Ruppell, 1829) and Aplocheilus panchax experiments were sorted by total length to different size (Hamilton, 1822) under 04 order and 07 families were groups. collected during the study period (Table 1, Fig. 2). The Larvivorosity of each fish was measured on the basis following fishes- Trichogaster fasciata (Bloch & of their feeding capacity. For this, the mosquito larvae Schneider, 1801), Esomus danrica (Hamilton, 1822), were released in small glass troughs having fishes. Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton, 1822), Danio rerio Observations were recorded based on larval consumption (Hamilton, 1822), Gambusia affinis (Baird & Girard, by each fish. Thereafter the categorization of fish was 1853), Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859, Aphanius dispar done as voracious feeder, opportunistic feeder and (Ruppell, 1829) and Aplocheilus panchax (Hamilton, moderate feeder. 1822) were the voracious feeder followed by Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793), Channa gachua (Hamilton, RESULTS 1822), Channa striata (Bloch, 1793), Channa marulius As many as 20 species of larvivorous fishes viz. (Hamilton, 1822), Mystus vittatus (Bloch, 1794), Mystus Trichogaster fasciata Bloch & Schneider,1801, Channa tengara (Hamilton, 1822), Mystus seengtee (Sykes, 1839) punctata (Bloch, 1793), Channa gachua (Hamilton, and Amblypharyngodon mola Hamilton, 1822 as 1822), Channa striata (Bloch, 1793), Channa marulius opportunistic and Barilius bendelisis (Hamilton, 1807), (Hamilton, 1822), Mystus vittatus (Bloch, 1794), Mystus Puntius sophore (Hamilton, 1822), Pethia ticto tengara (Hamilton, 1822), Mystus seengtee (Sykes, 1839) (Hamilton, 1822) and Devario devario (Hamilton, 1822) Esomus danrica (Hamilton, 1822), Amblypharyngodon as moderate feeder (Fig. 3). The largest order was Occurrence of larvivirous fishes in Doon valley 185 Table 1 : List of collected Larvivorous fishes from Doon valley. S. Order Suborder Family Subfamily Species of Fish Feeding Potential No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Osphronemidae Luciocephalinae Trichogaster fasciata Voracious Feeder (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) 2 Anabantiformes Channoidei Channidae _ Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793) Opportunistic Feeder 3 Anabantiformes Channoidei Channidae _ Channa gachua Opportunistic Feeder (Hamilton, 1822) 4 Anabantiformes Channoidei Channidae _ Channa striata (Bloch, 1793) Opportunistic Feeder 5 Anabantiformes Channoidei Channidae _ Channa marulius Opportunistic Feeder (Hamilton, 1822) 6 Siluriformes _ Bagridae Bagrinae Mystus vittatus (Bloch, 1794) Opportunistic Feeder 7 Siluriformes _ Bagridae Bagrinae Mystus tengara Opportunistic Feeder (Hamilton, 1822) 8 Siluriformes _ Bagridae Bagrinae Mystus seengtee (Sykes, 1839) Opportunistic Feeder 9 _ Rasborinae Esomus danrica (Hamilton, 1822) Voracious Feeder 10 Cypriniformes _ Cyprinidae Rasborinae Amblypharyngodon mola Opportunistic Feeder (Hamilton, 1822) 11 Cypriniformes _ Cyprinidae Rasborinae Rasbora daniconius Voracious Feeder ((Hamilton, 1822)) 12 Cypriniformes Cyprinoidei Cyprinidae Rasborinae Devario devario Moderate Feeder (Hamilton, 1822) 13 Cypriniformes Cyprinoidei Cyprinidae Rasborinae Danio rerio (Hamilton, 1822) Voracious Feeder 14 Cypriniformes – Cyprinidae Rasborinae Barilius bendelisis Moderate Feeder (Hamilton, 1807) 15 Cypriniformes – Cyprinidae Puntius sophore (Hamilton, 1822) Moderate Feeder 16 Cypriniformes – Cyprinidae Barbinae Pethia ticto (Hamilton, 1822) Moderate Feeder 17 – Poeciliidae – Gambusia affinis Voracious Feeder (Baird & Girard, 1853) 18 Cyprinodontiformes – Poeciliidae – Poecilia reticulata Peters, 1859 Voracious Feeder 19 Cyprinodontiformes – Cyprinodontidae – Aphanius dispar (Rüppell, 1829) Voracious Feeder 20 Cyprinodontiformes – Aplocheilinae Aplocheilus panchax Voracious Feeder (Hamilton, 1822) Note: Classification of fish followed Nelson et al (2016).

Cypriniformes in which 8 fishes Esomus danrica noteworthy- Rama Rao (2014) reported 58 larvivorous (Hamilton, 1822), Amblypharyngodon mola (Hamilton, fish species from lower Manair dam at Karimnagar 1822), Rasbora daniconius (Hamilton, 1822), Devario (Andhra Pradesh) while Rao et al (2015) reported 22 devario (Hamilton, 1822), Danio rerio (Hamilton, 1822), larvivorous fish from 8 orders from Lake Kolleru and Barilius bendelisis (Hamilton, 1807), Puntius sophore assessed the mosquito larval preference of (Hamilton, 1822), Pethia ticto (Hamilton, 1822), were Amblypharyngodon mola, Colisa lalia, Mystus bleekeri recorded. In order Siluriformes, there were only three fish and Rasbora daniconius. Krishna et al (2016) reported i.e. Mystus vittatus (Bloch, 1794), Mystus tengara 29 species of larvivorous fish from 6 orders, 14 families (Hamilton, 1822) and Mystus seengtee (Sykes, 1839). and 20 genera from Lake Kolleru. DISCUSSION Rao et al (2017) documented larvivorous fish fauna There are a number of papers related to larvivorous of Krishna river Prakasam barrage, Vijayawada (Krishna fish diversity occurring in water bodies of different places. district), Andhra Pradesh and collected 19 species under In this regard the contributions of the following are 5 orders and 10 families. Order cypriniformes was the 186 Shivani Farswan et al

Fig. 3 :Classification of collected larvivorous fishes based on their feeding efficiency. Fig. 2 :Family- wise percentage of larvivorous fishes in the study area. most dominant group among the orders followed by Ontogenetic Diet Shift and Prey Selection. J. Fish Biol. 55, bagiridae and channidae. In the present findings, as many 135-147. as 20 species of fish have been recorded and the order Gerberich J B and Laird M (1985) Larvivorous fish in the biocontrol Cypriniformes was having maximum number of fish. In of mosquitoes, with a selected bibliography of recent literature. In: Laird M and Miles J W (eds). Integrated mosquito control this aspect our findings are close to Rao et al (2017), methodologies. Vol. 2. Biocontrol and other innovative though there is difference if the species composition is components and future directions. London: Academic Press. considered. pp. 47-76. According to Job (1940), larvivorous fish must be Govinda Rao K, Rao C S and Simhachalam J G (2017) Larvivorous fish diversity in Krishna River at Prakasam barrage, Vijayawada small, hardy and capable of getting about easily in shallow (Krishna district), Andhra Pradesh, India. Bioscience Discovery waters among thick weeds where mosquitoes find suitable 8(2), 184-191. breeding grounds. They must be drought resistant and Gratz N S, Legner E F, Meffe G K, Bay E C, Service M W, Swanson capable of flourishing in both deep and shallow waters C, Cech J J Jr and Laird M (1996) Comments on ‘‘Adverse as well as living in drinking water tanks and pools without assessments of Gambusia affinis. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. contaminating the water. They must have the ability to 12, 160-166. withstand rough handling and transportation for long Grover S P (1969) Fishing notes from the Doon. Cheetal 11(2), 23- distances. Larvivorous fish must be prolific breeders 24. having shorter span of life cycle. They must breed freely Grover S P (1970) On the collection of fishes of the Song river in Doon Valley, Uttar Pradesh. Gurukul Kangri Vishawavidyalaya. and successfully in confined waters. Larvivorous fish Journal of Scientific Research 2, 115 – 118. should be surface feeders and carnivorous in habit and Grover S P, Aggarwal B S and Rauthan J V S (1994) Ichthyofauna of should have a predilection for mosquito larvae even in Doon Valley. Himalayan J. Environ. Zool. 8, 128 - 133. the presence of other food materials. Another important Gupta S K and Rana D (2009) On Colisa sp. From Eastern Doon - criterion of all larvivorous species should be its Taxonomic notes and Distributional New Record. Annals of appearance. They should not be brightly coloured or Forestry 17(1), 125 – 134. attractive. They should be compatible with the existing Gupta S, Tripathi M and Mishra R P (2018) Analysis of Food fish life in that environment. Above all, they should have Preference of Molly Fish (Poecilia sphenops) with Special no food value, so that the fish-eating people discard them. Reference Towards Mosquito Larvae. Asian J. Exp. Sci. 32(1), 23-28. The authors agree with the views of Job (1940) regarding the characteristics of an ideal larvivorous fish. Hora S L and Mukerjee D D (1936) Fish of the Eastern Doons, United Provinces. Record Indian Museum 38(2), 133 - 146. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Husain A (1987) Studies on the fish fauna of some streams of We are thankful to Dr. Ajay Saksena, Principal, Dehradun with notes on systematics, ecology and D.A.V.(P.G.) College, Dehradun for his co-operation and zoogeography. Vols. I & II, 1212 pp., 76 plates. (D. Phil Thesis, Garhwal University, Srinagar). for providing adequate laboratory facilities. Husain A (2003) Pisces. In: Fauna of Asan wetland. Wetland REFERENCES Ecosystem Series. 5 Zoological Survey of India: 23 - 26. Chatterjee S N and Chandra G (1997) Laboratory trials on the feeding IUCN (2013) Red List of threatened species, version 2013.2. pattern of Anopheles subpictus, Culex quinquefasciatus and www.iucnredlist.org down loaded on December 2013. Armigeres subalbatus larvae by Gambusia affinis. Sci. Cult. Jauhari R K, Saxena R M, Srivastava J K and Mahesh R K (1996) 63, 51-52. Larvivorous potential of some indigenous fishes of Doon Valley Das S M (1960) The Fisheries of the Doon valley. Uttarbharti 11 - with special reference to their efficacy in control of Anophelines. 17. J. Parasitol. Appl. Anim. Biol. 5(1), 49-55. García-Berthou E (1999) Food of Introduced Mosqui•tofish: Job T J (1940) An investigation of the nutrition of the perches of the Occurrence of larvivirous fishes in Doon valley 187 Madras coast. Rec Mind Mus. 42, 289-364. Rao R K (2014) A study on larvivorous fish species efficacy of lower Krishna C H, Rao J C S and Veeraiah K (2016) Diversity of Manair dam at Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh, India. Pelagia larvivorous fish fauna in Lake Kolleru (AP), India. Int. J. Fauna Research Library. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 5(2), 133-143. Bio. Stud. 3(3), 24-28. Rauthan J V S, Rauthan R, Rawat S, Grover S P and Chauhan D Kumar A, Sharma V P, Sumodan P K and Thavaselvam D (1998) (2005) Taxonomic account and the field observations on the Field trials of biolarvicide Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis biology of hill trout Barilius bola (Hamilton) in Doon Valley. strain 164 and the larvivorous fish Aplocheilus blockii against Aquaculture 6(1), 125-127. Anopheles stephensi for malaria control in Goa, India. J. Am. Rauthan J V S, Rauthan R, Rawat S, Joshi V and Grover S P (2001) Mosq. Control Assoc. 14, 457-462. Taxonomic account and the field observations on the biology Kumar Om, Bisht S and Singh N (1990) Studies on water quality of hill trout B. vagra vagra (Hamilton) in Doon Valley. Cheetal and fish of Song river in Eastern Doon valley forests. Indian 39, 62-66. Forester 35- 42. Rupp H R (1996) Adverse assessments of Gambusia affinis: An Lal M B and Chatterjee P (1963) Survey of Eastern Doon fishes alternative view for mosquito control practitioners. J. Am. Mosq. with certain notes on their biology. J. Zool. Soc. India 14(2), Control Assoc. 12, 155–166. 230 – 243. Sharma V P (1994) Role of fishes in vector control in India. In: Sharma Manna B, Aditya G and Banerjee S (2011) Habitat heterogeneity V P and Ghosh A (eds.). Larvivorous fishes of inland and prey selection of Aplocheilus panchax: an indigenous fish. ecosystems: Proceedings of the MRC-CICFRI workshop, New J. Vector Born Dis. 48, 144-149. Delhi, 27-28 September 1989. Delhi: Malaria Research Centre (ICMR). pp: 1-19. Morgan L A and Buttemer W A (1996) Predation by the non-native fish Gambusia holbrooki on small Litoria aurea and L. dentata Singaravelu G, Mahalingam S and Jaya Bharati K (1997) Predatory tadpoles. Aust. Zool. 30(2), 143-149. efficiency of larvivorous fish Gambusia affinis on the mosquito larvae of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles stephensi. Curr. Sci. NBFGR (1998) CAMP: Organized by Zoo Outreach Organisation, 72, 512-514. NBFGR, Lucknow. 1998. Singh P P (1964) Fishes of the Doon valley. Ichthyologica 3(1 - 2), Raghavendra K and Subbarao S K (2002) Chemical insecticides in 86- 92. malaria vector control in India. ICMR Bull. 32, 1-7. Uniyal D P and Kumar A (2006) Fish diversity in the selected streams Rajnikant, Pandey S D and Sharma S K (1996) Role of biological of Chakrata and Shiwalik hills (District Dehradun , agents for the control of mosquito breeding in rice fields. Indian Uttarakhand), India. Record Zoological Survey of India, Occ. J. Malariol. 33, 209-215. Paper No. 253, 1-120 . Rao J C S, Rao K G, Raju C S and Chalam G S (2015) Larvicidal Uniyal D P and Mehta H S (2007) Faunal diversity of Western Doon efficacy of four indigenous ornamental fish species of lake Shiwaliks Fishes: (Pisces). Zoological Survey of India (Special Kolleru, India. J. Biodiver. Environm. Sci. 7(1), 164-172. Publication), 41 - 59.