OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use of artcles in any medium, reproducton, and distributon by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publicaton.

Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)

Communication diversity and the conservation status of a wetland of Cooch Behar District, West Bengal,

Ram Krishna Das

26 March 2018 | Vol. 10 | No. 3 | Pages: 11423-11431 10.11609/jot.3404.10.3.11423-11431

For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies and Guidelines visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct visit htp://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints contact

Threatened Taxa

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431

Fish diversity and the conservation status of a wetland of

Cooch Behar District, West Bengal, India Communication

Ram Krishna Das ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Department of Industrial Fish and Fisheries, Asutosh College, 92, Shyamaprasad Mukherjee Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700 026, India OPEN ACCESS [email protected]

Abstract: A study was carried out from March 2016 to February 2017 to investgate the diversity of fshes and the conservaton status of Bochamari Beel, a natural wetland of Cooch Behar District, West Bengal, India. The study revealed the occurrence of 40 of fshes belonging to 31 genera under six orders and 15 families. Cyprinidae was the dominant family with 14 species followed by Channidae with four species, and Bagridae with three species each, Nandidae, , Belontidae, Siluridae and Clariidae with two species each whereas Cobitdae, Belonidae, Gobiidae, Anabantdae, Tetraodontdae and Notopteridae were represented by a single species each. The status of species of this beel included one Endangered species, one Vulnerable species and four Near Threatened species. The maximum fsh diversity was recorded in the monsoon season (H’=2.876) as compared with pre monsoon (H’=2.124) and post monsoon (H’ =1.735). The evenness index varied from 0.640 (post monsoon) to 0.822 (monsoon), which indicates uneven distributon of fshes in this beel. Indiscriminate fshing throughout the year, along with extensive weed infestaton could be responsible for depleton of fsh diversity in this beel.

Keywords: Bochamari Beel, fsh diversity, threatened fsh, wetland.

DOI: htp://doi.org/10.11609/jot.3404.10.3.11423-11431 | ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:07D56A96-8DC1-4476-813D-FFB8ED2C7D22

Editor: Neelesh Dahanukar, IISER, Pune, India. Date of publicaton: 26 March 2018 (online & print)

Manuscript details: Ms # 3404 | Received 09 March 2017 | Final received 31 January 2018 | Finally accepted 25 March 2018

Citaton: Das, R.K. (2018). Fish diversity and the conservaton status of a wetland of Cooch Behar District, West Bengal, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 10(3): 11423–11431; htp://doi.org/10.11609/jot.3404.10.3.11423-11431

Copyright: © Das 2018. Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this artcle in any medium, reproducton and dis- tributon by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publicaton.

Funding: None.

Competng interests: The author declares no competng interests.

Author Details: Shri Ram Krishna Das is an Assistant Professor in Industrial Fish and Fisheries, Asutosh College. He obtained his master degree in Zoology (Specializaton- Fish Biology) in 2005 from Visva-Bharat and qualifed NET (CSIR) in Life Sciences in 2010. His interested feld of research are fsh diversity, and fsh toxicology.

Acknowledgements: The author wish to express deep grattude to Dr. Dipak Kumar Kar, Principal, Asutosh College for permission and facilites. Author is grateful to Shri Tanmoy Sarkar (Assistant teacher, Putmari High School, Cooch Behar) for assistng during the sampling of fshes and to all fshermen of Bochamari Beel for giving the opportunity for data collecton. The author is also grateful to Shri Rahul Mondal (Assistant Professor, Dept. of Industrial Fish and Fisheries, Asutosh College) and Dr. Satyam Kumar Kundu (Faculty member, Dept. of Industrial Fish and Fisheries, Asutosh College) for giving valuable suggestons during the manuscript writng.

11423 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das

INTRODUCTION bodies of varying sizes, namely, Rasik Beel, Raichangmari Beel, Bochamari Beel, Sakobhanga Beel and Noldoba According to the Ramsar Conventon, wetlands are Beel. The nature of the beels is of the ox-bow lake and areas of marsh, fen, peatland or water, whether natural formed by the meandering of the Raidak, Sakobhanga or artfcial, permanent or temporary, with water that is and Ghoramara rivers (Roy et al. 2012). Most of the statc or fowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas beels of the RBWC become well connected only during of marine water, the depth of which at low tde does not the monsoon months of a year. Bochamari Beel is a exceed six meters (Ramsar Conventon Secretariat 2013). perennial beel which retains water throughout the year. Wetlands are classifed into fve categories such as (a) On the basis of riverine connecton, the Bochamari Beel oxbow lake, (b) fresh water lakes, (c) fresh water ponds, may be termed as a closed beel as it is completely cut-of (d) marshes, swamps and bogs, and (e) reservoirs (Kar from the nearest rivers and receives water mostly from et al. 2007). India has extensive food plains in the form their catchment areas following the monsoon rains. of oxbow lakes such as beels, jheels, mauns, and chaurs Bochamari Beel has remained as a major resource for especially in the states of West Bengal and adjoining capture fsheries and serves as a means of livelihood places, like Assam and Bihar. Beels are shallow, nutrient for about fve hundred fshermen families. The fshing rich water bodies formed due to a change in course of actvites are totally prohibited in the remaining beels of a river. Some of these retain connecton with the main the Rasik Beel wetland complex. river, at least during monsoons, while others have lost it Fish consttutes almost half of the total number of permanently. These are perennial wetlands that contain vertebrates in the world. Indian freshwater fsh diversity water throughout the year (Kar et al. 2007). Beels of is very rich with as many as 1,027 species, comprising Assam generally possess high potental for in situ fsh primary, secondary and alien freshwater fshes. Among producton. A number of them also provide a collecton them primary freshwater fshes include 858 species sink for fsh produced in the surrounding fooded belonging to 167 genera under 40 families and 12 orders. catchments. The average yield of Assam on the basis Further, 137 species of secondary freshwater fshes that of enquiries made in 23 beels in the state was 173kg/ha frequently enter and thrive in freshwater reaches of (Bhatacharjya & Sugunan 2000). rivers are also known from India. Thirty-two species of Northern Bengal comprises those districts of West alien fshes belonging to 21 genera of nine families and Bengal that lie north of the river Ganga. The term seven orders are found in the fresh water systems of does not denote any natural division and is purely an India. Out of this, 16 species are well known, potental administratve connotaton. Seven districts consttute invasive alien fshes in India (Gopi et al. 2017). On the northern Bengal. These are: Malda, South Dinajpur, other hand West Bengal contains about 207 freshwater North Dinajpur, Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri, Alipurduar and fshes (Sanyal et al. 2012). The most comprehensive Cooch Behar. Faunistcally, however, these areas are account of the fsh fauna of northern Bengal was numerous in variety and taxonomically interestng. This published by Shaw & Shebbeare (1938). They listed may be because of the rich Himalayan foothills with about 131 species in their treatse whereas, Jayaram the numerous streams and major rivers rushing to the & Singh (1977) recorded about 96 species of fshes in plains through these districts (Jayaram & Singh 1977). A northern Bengal. Due to the presence of a number of large number of wetlands in the form of beels are found threatened, endemic and unique/interestng species in in northern Bengal, especially in the district of Cooch northern Bengal, this region might be considered as a Behar. Bochamari Beel is one of the very important “Hot Spot” of fsh resources of West Bengal (Barman natural wetlands located in the subdivision Tufanganj 2007). of the district of Cooch Behar. It is a part of Rasik Beel Das et al. (2013) studied the faunal diversity of RBWC, wetland complex (Das et al. 2013). The Rasik Beel Cooch Behar. They reported the occurrence of 53 species wetland complex (RBWC) is the largest wetland complex of fshes belonging to nine orders, 22 families and 11 sub in Cooch Behar District of West Bengal covering around families in diferent beels of Rasik Beel wetland complex. 18.40km2 of area of which the wetland occupies almost They also reported the occurrence of 173 species of 1.78km2 area. The Ministry of Environment, Forest & birds, four , 49 arthropods, six molluscans, fve Climate Change (MoEFCC), Government of India, has amphibians, six reptllian and nine mammalian species. identfed 94 wetlands of natonal importance, many of A detailed study of fsh diversity and the conservaton which are protected areas including Rasik Beel (NWCP status in Bochamari Beel, however, is lacking. Therefore, 2009). The vast wetland complex consttutes water the present investgaton was carried out to document

11424 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das the fsh diversity and conservaton status of Bochamari other characters of the fshes were noted immediately Beel of Cooch Behar District. afer harvestng and photographs were taken by a digital camera (Images 3–37). Harvested fshes were then killed and preserved in 10% formalin soluton for MATERIALS AND METHODS further study. All the specimens are deposited in the aquatc biodiversity museum of the department The study was carried out in Bochamari Beel of Industrial Fish and Fisheries, Asutosh College, Kolkata, (26.250N & 89.440E, 38m elevaton), a natural wetland West Bengal, India (Registraton number: AC-IFF/ of Cooch Behar District, West Bengal, India from March AABM/Pisces/ specimen no. B/1–40). The fshes were 2016 to February 2017 (Fig. 1). The shortest distance identfed in the laboratory using the taxonomic keys of from Cooch Behar Town to the Bochamari Beel is about Jayaram (2009, 2010) and Shaw & Shebbeare (1938). 55–58 km whereas it is about 25–30 km from Alipurduar The diversity and evenness indices were calculated Town. Fish were harvested every fortnight from the beel according to Shannon (1948) and Pielou (1966). using gill nets (mesh size 0.6–7.0 cm), cast nets (mesh 1. Shannon index of general diversity (Shannon size 0.6–6.0 cm), drag nets (mesh size 0.10–0.15 cm), 1948): H’=-∑Pi ln Pi where, Pi is the importance probability push nets (mesh size 0.10–0.15 cm), box traps, ‘Koncha’ for each species= ni/N, ni is the importance value for (spear fshing) or ‘Teta’ , ‘Barsha’ (hook and line), each species (number of individual, biomass, producton and hook and line (Images 1 & 2). To investgate the and so forth), N is the total of importance values. In seasonal variaton of fsh communites, this study period this study, ni is the total number of individuals of each was categorized into three phases, viz., pre-monsoon species and the N is the total number of individuals. (Feb-May) with litle or no rainfall but with very high This number of individuals from total catch using all the temperature, the monsoon (June–September) with catching methods for a given sampling event. heavy rainfall and relatvely lower temperature, and 2. Evenness index (Pielou 1966): e =H’/lnS where, post-monsoon (October–January) season with a drastc H’ is the Shannon index of general diversity and S is the reducton of temperature and occasional rainfall. To fnd number of species. out the seasonal diversity index and evenness index, The threat status of fshes were determined by pooled data of these months together were taken. following IUCN Red List of Threatened Species categories Colour, colour paterns, spots/blotches, stripes and and criteria (2017). The frequency of occurrence of each

Bochamari Beel

Figure 1. Locaton of Bochamari Beel (Courtesy: Google maps)

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 11425 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das

©Tanmoy Sarkar

Image 2. Harvestng of fsh with gill nets in Bochamari Beel

© Ram Krishna Das Laubuca laubuca, Pethia gelius, Puntus terio, Ompok Image 1. Juvenile fshes harvested pabo, Paracanthocobits bota, Bota dario, Aplocheilus panchax, Monopterus cuchia, aculeatus, Macrognathus puncalus, Colisa labiosus, Colisa sota, species was calculated based on the number of occasions Ctenopts nobilis, Rasbora rasboa and Rasbora daniconius the species was collected during the samplings. The were not documented in the present study, although status was determined with the help of a standard catch they were recorded by Das et al. (2013). frequency chart presented by Tamang et al. (2007; Catch In the present study about six threatened species frequency: 91–100 % = Common, 81–90 % = Abundant, including one Endangered, one Vulnerable and four Near 61–80 % = Frequent, 31–59 % = Occasional, 15–30 % Threatened were found. Clarias magur of the family = Sporadic, 05–14 % = Rare, Less than 5% = extremely Clariidae was identfed as the endangered species. The rare). vulnerable species of the beel was Cyprinus carpio of the family Cyprinidae. The Near Threatened species of the beel were Hypopophthalmichthys molitrix, Ompok RESULTS AND DISCUSSION pabda, Wallago atu and lala. On the basis of catch frequency, 16 species (39.02%) were found to Details of fshes of Bochamari Beel are presented in be rare/extremely rare. The abundant species of fshes Table 1 and in Images 3–37. A total of 40 species of fshes in the beel were Puntus sophore and Esomus danrica belonging to 31 genera under six orders and 15 families of the family Cyprinidae and Mystus vitatus and Mystus were identfed from Bochamari Beel. Cyprinidae tengara of the family of Bagridae. was the dominant family with 14 species followed by The species diversity index of diferent seasons Channidae with four species, Ambassidae and Bagridae ranged from 1.735 to 2.876. In this study a maximum with three species each, Nandidae, Mastacembelidae, fsh diversity was recorded during the monsoon season Belontidae, Siluridae and Clariidae with two species each (H’=2.876) as compared to the pre monsoon (H’=2.124) whereas Cobitdae, Belonidae, Gobiidae, Anabantdae, and post monsoon (H’=1.735) as this beel remained well Tetraodontdae and Notopteridae were each represented connected to the other beels of the wetland complex by a single species. Previous study of this beel reported during the monsoon months but well separated from the occurrence of 44 species of fsh (Das et al. 2013). each other during the rest of the season. Variety of Fifeen species of fshes were documented for the frst diferent fshes enters into the Bochamari Beel from tme from this beel in comparison with the previous other beels during monsoon, which has resulted in a work. They are Cirrhinus mrigala, Hypophthalmichthys higher value of fsh diversity index. The same result was molitrix, Ctenopharyngodon idella, Cyprinus carpio, also reported by Kar et al. (2006) in Sone beel of Assam, Puntus sophore, Barbonymus gonionotus, Badis India. The evenness index at three seasons (monsoon badis, Parambassis lala, lalius, Mystus = 0.822, post monsoon = 0.640, pre monsoon = 0.668) bleekeri, Mystus tengara, Wallago atu, Macrognathus indicates uneven abundances of diferent fshes in this aral, cancila and Notopterus notopterus. beel. The details about the number of species, number Some of the species like Cirrhinus cirrhosus, Rama of individuals, Shannon index and Evenness index are chandramara, Labeo calbasu, Osteobrama coto coto, presented in Table 2.

11426 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das

Table 1. Checklist of fshes of Bochamari Beel, Cooch Behar, West Bengal, India

Order Family Scientfc name Common / local Status (as Threat status name per catch (as per IUCN frequency) 2017) Cyrininiformes Mola Frequent LC Cyprinidae 1. Amblypharyngodon mola (Hamilton, 1822)

2. Gibelion catla (Hamilton, 1822) Catla Rare LC

3. Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822) Mrigal Rare LC

4. Esomus danrica (Hamilton, 1822) Darikina Abundant LC

5. Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844) Grass carp Rare NE 6. Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (Valenciennes, Silver carp Rare NT 1844) 7. Cyprinus carpio Linnaeus, 1758 Common carp Rare VU

8. Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) Rohu/rui Sporadic LC

9. Labeo bata (Hamilton, 1822) Bata Sporadic LC

10. Puntus sophore (Hamilton, 1822) Desi Punt Abundant LC

11. Pethia tcto (Hamilton, 1822) Titla Punt Frequent LC

12. Pethia conchonius (Hamilton, 1822) Lal Punt Frequent LC 13. Barbonymus gonionotus (Bleeker, 1849) Java punt Occasional LC

14. Systomus sarana (Hamilton, 1822) Sar Punt Sporadic LC

Cobitdae 15. Lepidocephalichthys guntea (Hamilton, 1822) Gutum Frequent LC

Perciformes Channidae 16. Channa gachua (Hamilton, 1822) Cheng Occasional LC

17. Channa punctata (Bloch, 1793) Sat Abundant LC

18. Channa striata (Bloch, 1793) Shol Occasional LC

19. Channa marulius (Hamilton, 1822) Shal Extremely Rare LC

Nandidae 20. Badis badis (Hamilton, 1822) Khorikata Extremely Rare LC

21. Nandus nandus (Hamilton, 1822) Veda Occasional LC

Gobiidae 22. Glossogobius giuris (Hamilton, 1822) Bele Sporadic LC

Ambassidae 23. Parambassis lala (Hamilton, 1822) Lal Chanda Rare NT

24. Parambassis ranga (Hamilton, 1822) Chanda Rare LC

25. Chanda nama Hamilton, 1822 Chanda Sporadic LC

Belontidae 26. Trichogaster fasciata Bloch & Schneider, 1801 Kholisa Rare LC

27. Trichogaster lalius (Hamilton, 1822) Kholisa Rare LC

Mastacembelidae 28. Mastacembelus armatus (Lacepede, 1800) Bam Sporadic LC

29. Macrognathus aral (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) Gochi Sporadic LC

Anabantdae 30. Anabas testudineus (Bloch, 1792) Koi Sporadic DD

Beloniformes Belonidae 31. Xenentodon cancila (Hamilton, 1822) Bok machh Sporadic LC

Siluriformes Siluridae 32. Wallago atu (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) Boyal Rare NT

33. Ompok pabda (Hamilton, 1822) Pabda Rare NT

Clariidae 34. Clarias magur (Linnaeus, 1758) Magur Sporadic EN

35. Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch 1794) Singi Frequent LC

Bagridae 36. Mystus vitatus (Bloch, 1794) Tengra Abundant LC

37. Mystus bleekeri (Day, 1877) Tengra Rare LC

38. Mystus tengara (Hamilton, 1822) Tengra Abundant LC

Osteoglossiformes Notopteridae 39. Notopterus notopterus (Pallas, 1769) Pholui Sporadic LC

Tetraodontformes Tetraodontdae 40. Leiodon cutcuta (Hamilton, 1822) Tapa Rare NE

IUCN Categories: LC - Least Concern, NT - Near Threatened, VU - Vulnerable, EN - Endangered, DD - Data Defcient, NE - Not Evaluated.

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 11427 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das

Table 2. Details of fsh diversity index and evenness index in three seasons.

Shannon index of general Seasons Total number of species Total number of individuals Evenness index diversity Pre-Monsoon 24 1045 2.124 0.668

Monsoon 33 1700 2.876 0.822

Post-Monsoon 15 518 1.735 0.640

Table 3. List of fshing gear operated in the beel

No. of Mesh Size Length Height Fishing Name Local name Shape Fishermen (cm) (M) (M) period required Throughout 1 Gill net Phansi jal Rectangular Net fshing gear 0.6–7.5 20–60 0.65–3.5 1–2 the year Throughout 2 Cast net Chhabi jal Bell shaped Net fshing gear 0.6–6 - 4.30–5.20 1 the year Throughout the year 3 Drag net Masari jal Rectangular Net fshing gear 0.10–0.15 50 6 3–4 except monsoon Throughout 4 Push net Thela jal Triangular Net fshing gear 0.10–0.15 - - 1 the year Hook and Throughout 5 Barshi Rod shaped Tackle - 2-3 - 1 line the year 6 Barsha Barsha - Tackle - - - 1 Monsoon Koncha/ Throughout 7 Koncha/Teta Rod shaped Miscellaneous - 2-3 - 1 Teta the year 8 Box trap Tapai Rectangular Miscellaneous - 0.5–1.5 0.1–0.2 1 Monsoon

The fshing gears used in this beel were fshing net CONCLUSION (gill net, drag net, push net, cast net), tackle (hook and line, ‘Barsha’) and miscellaneous gears (‘Koncha’ or The present investgaton reveals that the Bochamari ‘Teta’, box trap) as also reported in the lentc and lotc Beel exhibits a rich fsh diversity. To conserve water bodies of Cooch Behar District (Das & Barat 2014). the fsh diversity in Bochamari Beel the following The details about the fshing gears operated in this beel recommendatons are suggested to be implemented are presented in Table 3. Most of the fshing nets have a immediately. very small mesh size (1cm and below), as a result a large 1. Preventon of indiscriminate fshing: number of juvenile fshes are being captured. It was also Overexploitaton is tremendously detrimental to observed that a signifcant number of brood fshes were the overall fsh diversity of the Bochamari Beel. invariably killed in this beel during the monsoon month. Indiscriminate fshing should be prevented at any cost Moreover, indiscriminate fshing throughout the year is to save the fsh diversity in the beel. Strict measures likely to result in the depleton of fsh diversity. should be taken for those who will catch juvenile fshes. The Bochamari Beel is extensively infested by 2. Mesh size restricton: To maintain a sustainable a number of aquatc weeds such as Eichornia sp., stock, the fshing net with lower mesh size should be Eutricularis sp., Trapa sp., Erienthus sp. and Phragmites prevented. Fishing net with mesh size of more than sp. (Das et al. 2013). These species have high growth one centmeter may be used. Regular inspecton by the rate and clog waterways, making fshing, boatng, and authorites of fsheries department should be undertaken almost all other water related actvites impossible. The to prevent such malpractces. In this respect, net makers mats of these plants block the penetraton of sunlight. should also be given the proper instructons. It was also revealed that the beel has been afected by 3. Declaraton of closed season: To carryout the siltaton, water polluton due to leakage of pestcide undisturbed spawning, closed season should be used in nearby agricultural lands and over fooding implemented during the monsoon months (June to during heavy rainfall in monsoon months. August) to maintain the optmum fsh stock. All types of fshing actvites should strictly be prohibited at that

11428 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das tme. Das, R.K. & S. Barat (2014). Fishing gears operated in lentc and lotc water bodies of Cooch Behar District, West Bengal, India. Indian 4. Control of aquatc weeds: As the beel is thickly Journal of Traditonal knowledge 13(3): 619–625. infested by a number of aquatc weeds, the eradicaton Gopi K.C., S.S. Mishra & L. Kosygin (2017). Pisces. In: Chandra K., K.C. of these aquatc weeds should be undertaken at regular Gopi, D.V. Rao, K. Valarmathi & J.R.B. Alfred (eds.). Current Status of Freshwater Faunal Diversity in India. Zoological Survey of India, intervals. To eradicate these aquatc weeds, diferent Kolkata, 624pp. weed eatng fshes might be introduced in additon to IUCN (2017). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2017- mechanical methods. 02 . Downloaded on 2 December 2017. 5. Culture and capture fsheries: Simultaneous Jayaram, K.C. (2009). Catishes of India. Narendra Publishing House, operaton of both culture and capture fsheries are New Delhi, xxii+383pp. benefcial for common fshermen. In this regard Jayaram, K.C. (2010). The Fresh Water of the Indian Region. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi, xxxii+616pp. some areas of the beel mostly on the periphery may Jayaram, K.C. & K.P. Singh (1977). On a collecton of fsh from Northern be converted for culture fsheries, for a period of fve Bengal. Record of Zoological Survey of India, 72: 243–275. months from January to May of every year. The central Kar, D., A.V. Nagarathna, T.V. Ramachandra & S.C. Dey (2006). Fish diversity and conservaton aspects of an aquatc ecosystem in part of the beel, which contains water throughout the northeastern India. Zoos’ Print Journal 21(7): 2308–2315; htp://doi. year, may be utlized for capture fsheries. org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.1437a.2308-15 6. Development of existng Fishermen cooperatve Kar, D., H. Barbhuiya & B. Saha (2007). Wetland Diversity in Assam: Their present status. Proceeding of Taal: The 12th World Lake societes: The development of infrastructure of existng Conference, 1844–1857. fshermen co-operatve society is strongly felt for NWCP (2009) (Natonal Wetland Conservaton Programme). Guidelines for conservaton and management of wetlands in India. the beterment of the socio-economic status of poor Conservaton and survey division, Ministry of Environment and fshermen families. Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, 45pp. 7. Awareness programme: Awareness programme Pielou, E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in diferent types of biological collecton. Journal of Theoretcal Biology 13: 131–144. regarding the conservaton of threatened and endemic Ramsar Conventon Secretariat (2013). The Ramsar Conventoin fshes should be undertaken. In this aspect, the state and Manual, A Guide to the Conventon on Wetlands (Ramsar, district fsheries department, educatonal insttutons, Iran, 1971), 6th Editon. Ramsar Conventon Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland, 103pp. other government and non government organizatons Roy, U.S., P. Banerjee & S.K. Mukhopadhyay (2012). Study on can play a vital role. avifaunal diversity from three diferent regions of northern Bengal, India. Asian Journal of Conservaton Biology 1(2): 120–129. Sanyal, A.K., J.R.B. Alfred, K. Venkataraman, S.K. Tiwari & S. Mitra (2012). Status of Biodiversity of West Bengal. Zoological Survey of REFERENCES India, Kolkata, 969pp. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematcal theory of communicaton. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–427 and 623–656. Barman, R.P. (2007). A review of the fresh water fsh fauna of West Shaw, G.E. & E.O. Shebbeare (1938). The fshes of northern Bengal. Bengal, India with suggestons for conservaton of threatened Journal of the Royal Asiatc Society of Bengal, Science Vol III: 137pp. and endemic species. Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Tamang, L., S. Chaudhury & D. Chaudhury (2007). Ichthyofaunal Occasional Paper 263: 1–48. contributon to the state and comparison of habitat contguity on Bhatacharjya, B.K. & V.V. Sugunan (2000). Ecology and Fisheries of taxonomic diversity in Senkhi stream, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Beel in Assam. Central Inland Capture Fisheries Research Insttute, Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 104(2): 170–177. Barrackpore, Bull No: 104: 1–84. Das, D., A. Sen & P. Mitra (2013). Major fauna of Rasik Beel wetland complex (WB). Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper 343: 1–76.

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 11429 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

Image 4. Channa punctata Image 3. Channa gachua Image 5. Mystus vitatus

© Ram Krishna Das

Image 7. Mystus bleekeri © Ram Krishna Das Image 8. Wallago atu © Ram Krishna Das Image 6. Mystus tengara

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das Image 10. Ompok pabda

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das Image 11. Heteropneustes fossilis

Image 9. Clarias magur

© Ram Krishna Das

Image 13. Parambassis ranga

© Ram Krishna Das Image 14. Chanda nama

Image 12. Parambassis lala

© Ram Krishna Das Image 16. Trichogaster fasciata

© Ram Krishna Das Image 18. Nandus nandus

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

Image 15. Trichogaster lalius © Ram Krishna Das Image 17. Anabas testudineus

Image 19. Badis badis

11430 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 Fish diversity and status of a Cooch Behar wetland Das

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

Image 20. Glossogobius giuris Image 21. Leiodon cutcuta Image 22. Pethia tcto

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

Image 23. Puntus sophore Image 24. Pethia conchonius Image 25. Barbonymus gonionotus © Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

© Ram Krishna Das

Image 26. Systomus sarana Image 27. Amblypharyngodon mola Image 28. Labeo rohita

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

Image 29. Ctenopharyngodon idella Image 30. Cirrhinus mrigala Image 31. Esomus danrica

© Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das © Ram Krishna Das

Image 34. Xenentodon cancila Image 33. Macrognathus aral

© Ram Krishna Das Image 32. Lepidocephalichthys guntea

© Ram Krishna Das Image 37. Channa marulius Image 36. Channa striata

© Ram Krishna Das Threatened Taxa Image 35. Notopterus notopterus

Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 March 2018 | 10(3): 11423–11431 11431 OPEN ACCESS The Journal of Threatened Taxa is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use of artcles in any medium, reproducton, and distributon by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publicaton.

ISSN 0974-7907 (Online); ISSN 0974-7893 (Print)

March 2018 | Vol. 10 | No. 3 | Pages: 11361–11494 Date of Publicaton: 26 March 2018 (Online & Print) www.threatenedtaxa.org DOI: 10.11609/jot.2018.10.3.11361-11494

Communicatons Short Communicatons

The status of Nepal’s mammals A Babbler’s tale: assessing the distributon of Turdoides striata -- Rajan Amin, Hem Sagar Baral, Babu Ram Lamichhane, Laxman Prasad (Dumont, 1823) (Aves: Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae) in India Poudyal, Samantha Lee, Shant Raj Jnawali, Krishna Prasad Acharya, Gopal -- Nishikant Gupta & Gautam Talukdar, Pp. 11450–11453 Prasad Upadhyaya, Megh Bahadur Pandey, Rinjan Shrestha, Dipesh Joshi, Janine Grifths, Ambika Prasad Khatwada & Naresh Subedi, Extension in its distributon range and a new record for the cicada Pp. 11361–11378 Salvazana Distant, 1913 (Hemiptera: Cicadidae: Cryptotympanii) from India The bat fauna (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the United Arab Emirates: a -- Sudhanya Ray Hajong & Rodeson Thangkiew, Pp. 11454–11458 review of published records and museum specimens with conservaton notes Umbrella Starwort Stellaria umbellata Turcz. (Caryophyllaceae): a new -- J. Judas, Gabor Csorba & Petr Benda, Pp. 11379–11390 record to the fora of the western Himalaya, India -- Satsh Chandra & D.S. Rawat, Pp. 11459–11463 Investgatng Sri Lanka’s human-monkey confict and developing a strategy to mitgate the problem First record of fungus Cryptomarasmius T.S. Jenkinson & Desjardin -- Surendranie Judith Cabral, Tharaka Prasad, Thulmini Pubudika (Physalacriaceae: Agaricales: Basidiomycota) from India Deeyagoda, Sanjaya Nuwan Weerakkody, Ashwika Nadarajah & -- Arun Kumar Duta & Krishnendu Acharya, Pp. 11464–11469 Rasanayagam Rudran, Pp. 11391–11398 Foliicolous fungi on medicinal plants in Thiruvananthapuram District, A checklist of bird communites In Tamhini Wildlife Sanctuary, the Kerala, India northern Western Ghats, Maharashtra, India -- A. Sabeena, V.B. Hosagoudar & V. Divaharan, Pp. 11470–11479 -- Dhananjay Chavan Vinayak & Subhash Vithal Mali, Pp. 11399–11409

Spatal and temporal paterns of stork sightngs (Aves: Ciconiidae) in Notes Natonal Chambal Sanctuary of Gangetc River system -- R.K. Sharma & L.A.K. Singh, Pp. 11410–11415 Pternopetalum latpinnulatum (Apiaceae), a new record for the fora of India The Red-headed Falcon Falco chicquera Daudin, 1800 (Aves: -- Licha Jeri, Nazir Ahmad Bhat & Yogendra Kumar, Pp. 11480–11483 Falconiformes: Falconidae) breeding on Palmyra Palm at Bahour Lake, Puducherry (Pondicherry), India Five new additons to the grass fora of Tripura State, India -- Raveendran Lekshmi & Surendhar Boobalan, Pp. 11416–11422 -- Sampa Ghosh & Debjyot Bhatacharyya, Pp. 11484–11492

Fish diversity and the conservaton status of a wetland of Cooch Behar District, West Bengal, India Response -- Ram Krishna Das, Pp. 11423–11431 A preliminary but incomplete checklist of Gujarat spiders Seasonal distributon and abundance of earthworms (Annelida: -- R.V. Vyas & B.M. Parasharya, Pp. 11493–11494 Oligochaeta) in relaton to the edaphic factors around Udupi Power Corporaton Limited (UPCL), Udupi District, southwestern coast of India -- T.S. Harish Kumar, M. Siddaraju, C.H. Krishna Bhat & K.S. Sreepada, Pp. Miscellaneous 11432–11442 Natonal Biodiversity Authority Breeding behaviour of the Coromandel Marsh Dart Damselfy (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae: Ceriagrion coromandelianum (Fabricius)) in central India Nilesh R. Thaokar, Payal R. Verma & Raymond J. Andrew, Pp. 11443– 11449

Threatened Taxa