Men in the Public Eye

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Men in the Public Eye MEN IN THE PUBLIC EYE Men's domination of the public domain is obvious, yet it is often ignored in social and political analyses. How do public men, in public patriarchies, come to exert such enormous power? How and why do men dominate in the public worlds of work, politics, sexuality, and culture? Jeff Hearn explores these questions and investigates how public worlds construct public men and public masculinities in different and changing ways. These important issues are examined by focusing on the period 1870-1920, when there was massive growth and transformation in the power of the public domains. Jeff Hearn explores the relationships between men's activity in and domination of the public domains, the domination of private domains by public domains, and the intensification of public patriarchies. An under­ lying theme is that the present exists in the past, and the past in the present, and Hearn demonstrates that these historical debates and dilemmas are still relevant today as men search for new, postmodern forms of masculinities. Men in the Public Eye reveals why men's domination in and of the public domains is a vital feature of gender relations in patri­ archies, both past and present. It will be essential reading for anyone interested in the social, political, and cultural dimensions of men and masculinities. Jeff Hearn is Senior Lecturer in Applied Social Studies at the University ofBradford. Critical studies on men and masculinities Jeff Hearn and David H.J. Morgan (editors) Men, Masculinities and Social Theory David Jackson Unmasking Masculinity A critical autobiography David H.J. Morgan Discovering Men Arthur Brittan The Competitive Self (forthcoming) Tim Edwards Erotic Politics (forthcoming) Editorial advisory board Harry Brod (Kenyon College, Ohio) Cynthia Cockburn (City University, London) Bob Connell (University of California, Santa Cruz) Paul Gilroy ( University of Essex) Jalna Hanmer (University of Bradford) Jeff Hearn (University of Bradford) Michael Kimmel (State University of New York) Marianne Krilll (University of Bonn) David Morgan (University of Manchester) Mary O'Brien (Ontario Institute of Studies in Education) Pratibha Parmar ( Writer and Film-maker) Ken Plummer (University of Essex) Rosemary Pringle (Macquarie University, Sydney) Lynne Segal (Middlesex Polytechnic) Victor Seidler (Goldsmiths' College, London) Elizabeth Stanko (Brunel University, London) Jeffrey Weeks (Bristol Polytechnic) Sue Wise (University of Lancaster) Men in the public eye The construction and deconstruction of public men and public patriarchies Jeff Hearn First published 1992 by Routledge Published 2017 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OXl4 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY I 0017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an infonna business Copyright© 1992 Jeff Hearn The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hearn, Jeff. Men in the public eye: the construction and deconstruction of public men and public patriarchies/Jeff Hearn. p. cm. - (Critical studies on men and masculinities) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. 1. Men. 2. Patriarchy. 3. Masculinity (Psychology) I. Title. II. Series HQ1090.H44 1992 305.31 dc20 91-44397 CIP ISBN 978-0-415-07619-7 (hbk) ISBN 978-0-415-07620-3 (pbk) Typeset in 10 on 12 Bembo by LaserScript, Mitcham, Surrey Contents List of tables and figures VI Series editor's preface Jeff Heam Vll Preface IX Acknowledgements Xl Foreword Pluralizing perspectives: the present and ilie~n 1 1 Introduction: the problem of public men 11 PART 1 FROM THE MALESTREAM TO PUBLIC PATRIARCHIES 2 Public men in the malestream 25 3 Patriarchy, public patriarchy, and related critiques 43 4 Public patriarchy: some initial implications for men and masculinities 69 5 Public patriarchies, public men, public domains, and public masculinities 74 PART 2 PUBLIC MEN IN PUBLIC PATRIARCHIES 6 Public men as social relations 95 7 Organizations of men (1): size, structures, and hierarchies 140 8 Organizations of men (2): processes, sexualities, and images 170 9 Public men as persons: selves, psyches, and senses 208 Afterword Beyond public men? 227 Notes 232 Bibliography 254 Name index 276 Subject index 282 [v] Tables and figures Tables 1.1 Examples of the ideological gendering of the private and the public 2 3.1 Private patriarchy, public patriarchy, and related concepts 54 3.2 Comparison ofWalby's (1986, 1989) and Hearn's (1987a) approaches to patriarchy 237 Figures 3.1 Types of masculine gender-system 51 3.2 Historical timescales in conceptualizing public patriarchy 55 7.1 Types of organization by gender divisions 244 [vi] Series editor's preface Gender is one of the most pervasive and taken-for-granted features of our lives. It figures strongly in the make-up of all societies. Yet it is easy to see that gender may also create problems - in terms of power, oppression, inequality, identity and self­ doubt. The growth of modern feminism and the associated development of women's studies have brought a deep questioning of women's social position. At the same time feminism and women's studies have provided continuing critical analyses of men and masculinities. In a rather different way the rise of gay liberation and gay scholarship has shown that previously accepted notions of sexuality and gender are no longer just 'natural'. This has led to a recognition that the dominant forms of men and masculinities are themselves not merely 'natural' and unchange­ able. In addition, inspired particularly by important research in women's studies and the need for a positive response to feminism, some men have in recent years turned their attention to the critical study of men. These various focuses on men are clearly very different from the traditional concern with men that has characterized the social sciences, where in the worst cases men have been equated with people in general. Thus men and mascu­ linities are seen not as unproblematic, but as social constructions which need to be explored, analysed, and indeed in certain res­ pects, such as the use of violence, changed. This series aims to promote critical studies, by women and men, on men and masculinities. It brings together scholarship that deals in detail with the social and political construction of parti­ cular aspects of men and masculinities. This will include studies of the changing forms of men and masculinities, as well as the broader historical and comparative studies. Furthermore, because men have been dominant in the writing of social science and production of malestream theory, one area of special interest for critical assessment is the relationship of men and masculinities to [vii) MEN IN THE PUBLIC EYE social science itself. This applies to both the content and 'results' of previous social research, and to the understanding of social theory in all its various guises - epistemology, ideology, method­ ology, and so forth. Each volume in the series will approach its specific topic in the light of feminist theory and practice, and, where relevant, gay liberation and gay scholarship. The task of the series is thus the critique of men and masculinities, and not the critique of femin­ ism by men. As such the series is pro-feminist and gay affirmative. However, this critical stance does not mean that men are simply to be seen or understood negatively. On the contrary, an impor­ tant part of an accurate study of men and masculinity is an appreciation of the positive features of men's lives, and especially the variety of men's lived experiences. The series includes a range of disciplines - sociology, history, politics, psychoanalysts, cul­ tural studies - as well as encouraging interdisciplinarity where appropriate. Overall, the attempt will be made to produce a series of studies of men and masculinities that are anti-sexist and anti­ patriarchal in orientation. Finally, while this series is primarily an academic development it will also at times necessarily draw on practical initiatives outside academia. Likewise, it will attempt to speak to changing patterns of men's practice both within and beyond academic study. Just as one of the most exciting aspects of feminism is the strong inter­ relation of theory and practice, so too must the critical study of men and masculinities and change in men's practice against patri­ archy develop in a close association. Jeff Hearn [viii] Preface Writing exists in spaces. It is in-between: between what can be said and what can be imagined. This writing exists within a number of spaces. It spans time and place - from Bradford (1986-88) to Manchester (1988-89) and back to Bradford (1989-91). It also is in-between: between analysis and experi­ ence; structure and process; modernism and postmodernism; con­ struction and deconstruction; men and masculinities; One and Others; and so on. [ix] Acknowledgements This book is the product of a lot of talking, reading, researching, writing, rewriting, and a lot of inspiration from women, men, and young people. There are very many people, groups, and organi­ zations I'd like to thank for assistance in this process. They include colleagues and students at the University of Bradford, particularly those who have been taking courses on 'men and masculinities'; Paul Wilding and all at the Department of Social Policy and Social Work at the University of Manchester for making me so welcome during 1988-89; the Hallsworth Research Fellowship Committee for their generous award of funds to do much of this work; the Manchester Campus Workshop on the Critical Study of Men and Masculinities for providing continuity and support; the Men, Masculinities and Socialism Group and other men's groups; and librarians at Bradford University, Manchester University, and Bradford Council for their help.
Recommended publications
  • Varieties of Familialism: Comparing Four Southern European and East Asian Welfare Regimes
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Saraceno, Chiara Article — Published Version Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes Journal of european social policy Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Saraceno, Chiara (2016) : Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes, Journal of european social policy, ISSN 1461-7269, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, Vol. 26, Iss. 4, pp. 314–326, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0958928716657275 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/171966 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ESP0010.1177/0958928716657275Journal of European Social PolicySaraceno 657275research-article2016 Journal Of European Article Social Policy Journal of European Social Policy 2016, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Abjection, 14–15, 166 Académie Française, 175, 176 Adam, Antoine
    Manning the Margins: Masculinity and Writing in Seventeenth-Century France Lewis C. Seifert http://www.press.umich.edu/titleDetailDesc.do?id=354488 The University of Michigan Press, 2009. Index abjection, 14–15, 166 118–19, 120, 122, 123–24, 132, 135, Académie Française, 175, 176 138–39, 141–42, 145, 277n6, 278n8, Adam, Antoine, 185, 204, 289n109, 278n14, 279n33, 279n37, 280n55. See 291–92n136, 292n144, 293n153 also Scudéry (Madeleine de) affectation, 110 art de plaire, 11, 25–26, 41, 45, 87 affectivity: gender and, 119; male body Art poétique (Boileau), 55 and, 146; men and, 123–24. See also ataraxia, 26 melancholy; tendresse Aubignac, Abbé François Hédelin d’, 81, aggression: civilizing process and, 8–9, 92 256n19; galanterie and, 89; honnêteté Auchy, Charlotte des Ursins, d’, 79 and, 9 Augustus (Gaius Julius Caesar Octa- agrément, 44, 112, 260n27, 261n32 vianus), 30 air galant (Scudéry, Madeleine de): authorship, 17, 186, 192, 289–90nn110–12, de‹nition of, 118; men and, 118–19; 232–33, 273–74n10, 300n73 men vs. women in, 120–22; power in, 121–25; tendresse and, 127; women and, Badinter, Elizabeth, 278n21 120 Balzac, Jean-Louis Guez de: career of, Alcibiades, 30, 38, 50 290n118; Voiture and, 108, 110–11, 115, Alexander the Great, 30, 38 271n117, 275n23; writer in Rambouil- Aligre, Marie d’, 90 let’s salon, 81 Amadis de Gaule, 104 bardache, 164, 171 anagnorisis, 239–41 Barthes, Roland, 271n116 Angennes, Julie d’, 105 Baudelaire, Charles, 184 “Apologie de Théophile” (Viau), 189, Baverel-Croissant, Marie-Françoise, 193–96, 292n37, 292n150
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Shifts...Etc. [Macrohistory]
    Feminist Critiques and Visions of the Future by Ivana Milojevic and Sohail Inayatullah “Feminist visions and Critiques of the future,” Futures Research Quarterly (Vol. 14, No. 1, Spring, 1998), 35-46 (with Ivana Milojevic). Rewritten and translated into Finnish in Futura (March, 2010), 19-31. Current trends One does not need to be an expert to realize that wherever we look, either into our past or into our present, either within our local community or around the world, one fact remains almost universal: society always treats its women worse than it treats its men. If current trends continue, women will continue to suffer from violence, poverty, malnutrition, legal and economical disadvantages well into the 21st century. Women will continue to face more difficulties than men in many areas of life, mostly because our societies are still controlled by men and male values. The crucial spheres for "controlling" the future, politics, as well as most institutional and personal decision making processes, will remain out of women's reach. According to the United Nations' future projections, women's position will improve a bit, but even in the year 2200, women will be far from reaching gender equality.1 According to these projections, the percentage of world income received by women will increase from current 10% to 20% in the year 2025, and then further to 40% in the year 2200. The 1 percentage of world property owned by women will increase from the "huge" 1% as it is today, to 3% in year 2025, and 20% in year 2200. In the year 2025, women will still outnumber men as poor (60%), illiterate (55%), refugees (70%), and sick (57%).2 Women can hope to still outlive men, as female life expectancy continue to be higher than male's, although this is not because of our social and "human" efforts to help the disadvantaged, but inspite of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaia, the Planetary Religion : the Sacred Marriage of Art and Science
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1994 Gaia, the planetary religion : the sacred marriage of art and science. Doctress Neutopia University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Neutopia, Doctress, "Gaia, the planetary religion : the sacred marriage of art and science." (1994). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 5144. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/5144 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GAIA, THE PLANETARY RELIGION: THE SACRED MARRIAGE OF ART AND SCIENCE A Dissertation Presented by DOCTRESS NEUTOPIA Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION February 1994 School of Education GAIA, THE PLANETARY RELIGION: THE SACRED MARRIAGE OF ART AND SCIENCE A Dissertation Presented by DOCTRESS NEUTOPIA Approved as to style and content by: o W. J.Jackson, Dejan 1 of Education Copyright by Doctress Neutopia 1994 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION GAIA The World Soul: Past, Present, and Future ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My profound thanks to dame Phyllis Rodin for engaging me in long deep conversations about the life-force. I would also like to thank my committee members: Dr. Robert Baker for encouraging me to do a traditional work of scholarship; Dr. Jack Wideman for supporting my efforts after searching for one long year for an outside member; and especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Global Governance: Contesting Images of the Future from People on the Edge of the Periphery
    1 Transforming Global Governance: Contesting Images of the Future from People on the Edge of the Periphery. Anita Kelleher, MLM, MFS Supervisors: Principal: Professor Joanne Scott Associate: Adjunct Professor Sohail Inayatullah Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Business University of the Sunshine Coast 2012 2 Keywords. Bioregionalism, critical futures studies, decision-making, feminism, future, global governance, globalisation, globalism, Global Digital Democracies, image, international relations, metaphor, multilateralism, myth, partnerships, planetary civilisation, United Nations, United Nations reform, Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation, transformation, vision, world order, worldviews. ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Transforming Global Governance: Contesting Images of the Future from People on the Edge of the Periphery 3 Abstract. This thesis aims to bring unconventional perspectives to the global governance debates by developing multiple images of futures from contesting worldviews. Informed by futures research and the perspectives and stories of nations and peoples currently unrepresented in global decision-making forums such as the United Nations General Assembly, the thesis maps global governance philosophies, systems and structures, agencies, and their underlying worldviews and myths to produce possible futures for each of six actor groups contesting the current global governance system. The criteria used to construct these possible futures are then used to construct a model and story for the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organisation (U.N.P.O.) using their materials, collected at their 2010 General Assembly, as content. The model and story represent the preferred global governance future for U.N.P.O. evoking an image of ‘One World’. The thesis in its entirety provides U.N.P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Camora 1.Pdf
    The Function of the Rhetoric of Maternity in the Representation of Female Sexuality, Religion, Nationality, and Race in Early Modern English Literature and Culture by Cecilia Morales A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in the University of Michigan 2020 Doctoral Committee: Professor Michael Schoenfeldt, Chair Dr. Neeraja Aravamudan, Edward Ginsberg Center, University of Michigan Professor Peggy McCracken Professor Catherine Sanok Professor Valerie Traub Cecilia Morales [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7428-3777 © Cecilia Morales 2020 Acknowledgements Throughout my doctoral studies, I have been fortunate to have the love and support of countless individuals, to whom I owe a great deal of gratitude. I’d like to begin by thanking my committee members. Cathy and Peggy taught me valuable lessons not only about my work but about being a thoughtful and compassionate scholar and teacher. Valerie’s reminders to always be as generous as possible when discussing the work of other scholars has kept me sane and stable in this competitive world of academia. Mike helped me, a displaced Texan, to feel at home in Michigan from our first meeting, during which we chatted about both Shakespearean scholarship and Tex Mex. Finally, the most recent addition to my committee is Neeraja Aravamudan, who I consider my most active mentor and supporter. One of the best decisions I made during graduate school was accepting an internship at the Edward Ginsberg Center, where Neeraja became my supervisor. Neeraja and the other Ginsberg staff remind me it’s possible to take my work very seriously without taking myself too seriously.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFORMATIONS Comparative Study of Social Transformations
    TRANSFORMATIONS comparative study of social transformations CSST WORKING PAPERS The University of Michigan Ann Arbor "Consumer Cultures, Political Discourse and the Problem of Cultural Politics" Fraflk Mort CSST Working CRSO Working Paper #86 Paper $482 Consumer Cultures, political Discourse and the Problem of Cultural Politics Frank Mort, Portsmouth Polytechnic, United Kingdom Paper Presented to Session IV of the 'Power' Conference, University of Michigan, USA, January 1992 Every quarter the Henley Centre for Forecasting publishes its survey of leisure in the United Kingdom. A prestige marketing organization, specializing in long-term planning for the consumer industries, Henley has developed a strong - track-record for in-depth social research. One of its survey findings makes particularly depressing, if familiar, reading. Throughout 1986 a sample profile was monitored for their main leisure patterns. What came out top were a list of late twentieth century pleasures which are principally made- available through market based structures: personal shopping, eating take-away meals, DIY, video watching. Right at the bottom of the list came politics. Going to a political meeting ranked on a par with a visit to the circus as one of our last likely things to do! Politics as something pleasurable, as something to do with one's disposable leisure time, it seems, is a decided non-starter. 1 This paper is focused via two inter-related themes touched on by the Henley Centre's survey: the articulation between a series of post-war political discourses and the leisure cultures of contemporary consumer capitalism. The arguments centre primarily on British politics and culture, though many of the debates reviewed present their analysis more globally, speaking of general characteristics of the 'advancedt industrial economies, the 'mature' democracies, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • By Jennifer M. Fogel a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    A MODERN FAMILY: THE PERFORMANCE OF “FAMILY” AND FAMILIALISM IN CONTEMPORARY TELEVISION SERIES by Jennifer M. Fogel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Communication) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Amanda D. Lotz, Chair Professor Susan J. Douglas Professor Regina Morantz-Sanchez Associate Professor Bambi L. Haggins, Arizona State University © Jennifer M. Fogel 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe my deepest gratitude to the members of my dissertation committee – Dr. Susan J. Douglas, Dr. Bambi L. Haggins, and Dr. Regina Morantz-Sanchez, who each contributed their time, expertise, encouragement, and comments throughout this entire process. These women who have mentored and guided me for a number of years have my utmost respect for the work they continue to contribute to our field. I owe my deepest gratitude to my advisor Dr. Amanda D. Lotz, who patiently refused to accept anything but my best work, motivated me to be a better teacher and academic, praised my successes, and will forever remain a friend and mentor. Without her constructive criticism, brainstorming sessions, and matching appreciation for good television, I would have been lost to the wolves of academia. One does not make a journey like this alone, and it would be remiss of me not to express my humble thanks to my parents and sister, without whom seven long and lonely years would not have passed by so quickly. They were both my inspiration and staunchest supporters. Without their tireless encouragement, laughter, and nurturing this dissertation would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUROSES and PSYCHONEUROSES. 1927, Lxii, 1
    J Neurol Psychopathol: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.s1-8.30.168 on 1 October 1927. Downloaded from 168168TABS'IA( ;TS elements of love. This is an antisocial factor. Monogamy engenders jealousy in both sexes and this interferes with sociality. Women have more to gain by marriage than men; this fact also causes jealousy. A most important factor is that woman's work is often of a relatively domestic and unsocial nature as compared with man's. The seclusion of women in the home also interferes with social behaviour. The author does not fail to observe, however, that under present day conditions the influence of some of these factors is tending to diminish. The increased social life of women is following a hetero- social rather than a homosocial course. This automatically increases male heterosociality. The institution of the family is in some ways antagonistic, but in other ways favourable to social sentiments. Tracing the influence of the family through successive ages, certain changes have occurred which are compared with those taking place in the environment as a whole. Although the family is probably the most primitive and natural social unit, in the' totemic age' it lost much of its importance as compared with the clan. In some ways, however, a satisfactory compromise occurred between jealousy and sociality. Later it became more important, but in the present times it is yielding its importance to social influences. Sociality implies less jealousy andguest. Protected by copyright. exclusive possession. Romantic sexual love favours the formation oI social sentiments because it implies ' aim-inhibition,' less egoism and narcissism.
    [Show full text]
  • LIS Working Paper Series
    LIS Working Paper Series No. 766 Income, Familialism and Women’s Economic Independence Kaitlin Alper June 2019 Luxembourg Income Study (LIS), asbl Income, Familialism and Women’s Economic Independence Income, Familialism and Women’s Economic Independence Kaitlin Alper Abstract This paper explores the dynamics of women’s economic independence at the individual household level and its relationship to country-level income distributions. I posit a nega- tive relationship between income and women’s economic independence. Using detailed household-level data from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) across thirteen advanced capitalist democracies, I show that women at upper ends of the income distribution con- sistently have less within-household economic independence than do their counterparts at the bottom of the distribution. I then show that this negative relationship is sensitive to political characteristics at the country level. In countries whose policies support a male breadwinner model, women’s economic independence is lower across the board than in other types of countries; in gender egalitarian countries, it is higher. Family policies do not, however, have a significant impact on the income stratification of women’s eco- nomic independence. These results suggest that social policy characteristics and labor market dynamics have important implications for gender equity both within and between households. 1 1 Introduction Over the past three decades, income inequality has been increasing throughout the advanced capitalist world (Piketty, 2014). For women, gendered income inequality in partic- ular has significant sociological implications, including unequal division of household labor and increased likelihood of abuse within relationships (Kalmuss and Straus, 1982; Brines, 1994; Macmillan and Gartner, 1999; Morris, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • En El Norte La Mujer Manda
    AMERICANHirsch / EN EL BEHAVIORAL NORTE LA MUJER SCIENTIST MANDA En el Norte la Mujer Manda Gender, Generation, and Geography in a Mexican Transnational Community JENNIFER S. HIRSCH Emory University This study explores generational and migration-related changes in gender and marriage in two locations of a transnational community of Mexicans: the sending community in western Mexico and the receiving community in Atlanta. The principal method was life histories, focusing on 13 women in Atlanta and their sisters or sisters-in-law in Mexico; life history informants’mothers and husbands were also interviewed. A generational paradigm shift in marital ideals has occurred, from an ideal of respeto (respect) to one of confianza (trust), characterized by cooperative decision making, heterosociality, a less gendered division of labor in social reproduction, and a new role for marital sexuality. Although women on both sides of the frontera (border) share this companionate ideal, economic opportunities, more privacy, and some legal protection from domestic violence gave women in Atlanta more lev- erage to push for these companionate marriages. Women and men in rural western Mexico and their relatives in Atlanta dis- cuss differences between life in the United States and Mexico in terms of gender: They say that “en el norte la mujer manda”—that in the North, women give the orders. Young Mexican women on both sides of the frontera (border), however, call our attention to the role of history rather than migration in the transforma- tion of gender: They say they are not as easily pushed around as their mothers. Although older women in this community were hardly powerless, in the space of Author’s Note: This study was conducted while the author was a doctoral student at Johns Hopkins University in the departments of Population Dynamics and Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority, Marriage, and Politics in Late-Medieval France
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts PERSUADING THE POLITY: AUTHORITY, MARRIAGE, AND POLITICS IN LATE-MEDIEVAL FRANCE A Dissertation in French and Women’s Studies by Elizabeth L. Kinne © 2013 Elizabeth L. Kinne Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 The dissertation of Elizabeth L. Kinne was reviewed and approved* by the following: Norris J. Lacy Edwin Erle Sparks Professor (Emeritus) of French and Medieval Studies Dissertation Advisor Co-Chair of Committee Bénédicte Monicat Professor of French and Women’s Studies Head of the Department of French and Francophone Studies Co-Chair of Committee Christine Clark-Evans Associate Professor of French, Women’s Studies, and African and African-American Studies Jean-Claude Vuillemin Professor of French Robert R. Edwards Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of English and Comparative Literature * Signatures are on file in the Graduate School Kinne ii Abstract Persuading the polity: Authority, marriage, and politics in late-medieval France In the later Middle Ages, texts on marriage proliferated, either works of conduct meant to make women good wives or more general reflections addressed to a wide spectrum of medieval society. These multiple and contradictory discourses regarding matrimony performed a variety of functions beyond attempting to regulate a household or persuade the audience of the worthiness, or lack thereof, of the institution. They are displays of power that seek to impose an idealized vision of society and one’s authority over others. An exploration of this subtext brings to light the difficulties of exerting individual agency in the face of myriad constraints, whether social, economic, or political.
    [Show full text]