Annual Report of the Public Printer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report of the Public Printer ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC PRINTER 1926 GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON D. C. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE Public Printer.—GEORGE H. CARTER, Iowa Deputy Public Printer.—John Greene, Massachusetts. Production Manager.—Ellwood S. Moorhead, Pennsylvania. Assistant to Public Printer.—Miss Mary A. Tate, Tennessee. Chief Clerk.—Henry H. Wright, New York. Assistant Chief Clerk.—J. Thomas Ford, New York. Superintendent of Accounts and Budget Officer.—James K. Wallace, Ohio. Assistant Superintendent of Accounts.—Frank E. Buckland, Indiana. Purchasing Agent.—Ernest E. Emerson, Maryland. Assistant Purchasing Agent.—William J. Cassiday, District of Columbia. Superintendent of Documents.—Alton P. Tisdel, Ohio. Assistant Superintendent of Documents.—Miss Josephine G. Adams, District of Columbix. Superintendent of Planning.—William A. Mitchell, North Carolina. Assistant Superintendent of Planning.—Robert W. Summers, New York. Storekeeper and Traffic Manager.—William H. Kervin, New York. Assistant Storekeeper.—GEORGE Lamb, Pennsylvania. Medical and Sanitary Officer.—Dr. Daniel P. Bush, Nebraska. Assistant Medical and Sanitary Officer.—Dr. John F. Atkinson,. Indiana. Chief of Tests.—Edward O. Reed, District of Columbia. Disbursing Clerk.—Edward J. Wilver, Pennsylvania. Instructor of Apprentices.—BuRR G. Williams, Iowa. Congressional Record Clerk.—William A. Smith, District of Columbia. Superintendent of Printing.—Henry W. Weber, Indiana. Assistant Superintendent of Printing.—Maurice H. Phillips, Ohio. Foreman Linotype Section,—William D. Skeen, Pennsylvania. Foreman Monotype Section.—William H. Chase, Maryland. Foreman Proof Section.—Marion E. Bullock, Maryland. Foreman Hand Section.—Hugh Reid, Wisconsin. Foreman Job Section.—Allan C. Clough, New Hampshire. Foreman Patents Section.—Charles Garrels, Illinois. Foreman Library Printing Branch.—James H. Heslet, Kansas. Chief Type Machinist.—Daniel L. Liddle, Michigan. Superintendent of Presswork.—Bert E. Bair, Michigan. Assistant Superintendent of Presswork.—Daniel Beckwith, New Hampshire. Foreman Main Pressroom.—Daniel I. Leane, New York. Foreman Job Pressroom.—James E. Veatch, New York. Foreman Postal Card Section.—Joseph A. Fenton, Michigan. Foreman Money Order Section.—John A. Massey, Jr., Georgia. Superintendent of Binding.—Martin R. Speelman, Missouri. Assistant Superintendent of Binding.—John A. Patterson, New York. Foreman Pamphlet Binding Section.—Charles J. Orem, Maryland. Foreman Ruling and Sewing Section.—Walter H. Oliver, Maine. Foreman Library Binding Branch.—Charles F. Weston, Massachusetts. Superintendent of Platemaking.—Edward G. Whall, Massachusetts. Assistant Superintendent of Platemaking.—Edward A. Kerr, Massachusetts. Foreman Molding Section.—James H. Babcock, Jr., Rhode Island. Foreman Photo-engraving Section.—William H. Meyer, Maryland. Night Assistant Production Manager.—Edward A. HusE, Massachusetts. Assistant Superintendent Presswork, night.—John D. Meyers, Ohio. Foreman Monotype Section, night.—William A. Morris, Missouri. Foreman Linotype Section, night.—Harry L. Murray, Pennsylvania. Foreman Proof Section, night.—Hermann B. Barnhart, Indiana. Foreman Hand Section, night.—George O. Atkinson, Massachiisetts. Superintendent of Construction and Maintenance.—Alfred E. Hanson, Massachusetts. Chief Draftsman.—Henry A. Ludwig, Maryland. Chief Carpenter.—Abraam B. Batton, Maryland. Chief Machinist.—Michael J. McInerney, New York. Chief Electrician.—Edward H. Brian, District of Columbia. Chief Engineer.—Walter A. Browne, New Hampshire. Chief Pipefitter.—Ovilup H. George, New York. Construction Foreman.—Daniel W. Bruce, District of Columbia. Foreman Sanitary Section.—Joseph L. May, Virginia. Chief of Delivery.—Walter G. Copp, District of Columbia. Captain of Guards.—Charles H. Warner, District of Columbia. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PUBLIC PRINTER Go\TIRXMENT PkINTING OfFICE, Office of the Public Printer. Washington, D. G Decemler 31, 1926: To the Congress of the United States: In compliance with law I have the honor to submit the following report of the work of the Government Printing Office for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1926, and also for the last half of the calendar year 1926. On March 4, 1926, the Government Printing Office completed 65 years of continuous service as an independent establishment of the Government. Therefore it seems fitting to begin this report with a brief comparison of the present establishment with the plant pur- chased by Congress on March 4, 1861. The Government Printing Office was operated during the Civii War under the direction of John D. Defrees, whom President Lin- coln appointed as its first superintendent. The building acquired at that time had 59,292 square feet of floor space, as compared with 750,175 square feet in the present buildings. The original building^ equipment, and materials cost the Government $135,000. The pres- ent buildings, equipment, and materials are valued at fully $8,000,000. COMPARISOX WITH CIVIL WAR-TIME OFFICE During the Civil War the Government Printing Office had 350 employees. The number has now increased to 4,100, and during the World War there were 5,307 employees on the rolls. Wages and salaries paid to employees in 1861 amounted to approximately $170,000, while the pay roll for 1926 was about $7,660,000. The average wage for Government printers in 1861 was $14 a week, while to-day their weekly earnings are four times as much, with consider- ably shorter hours of work and vastly better conditions of emplo;^- ment. In 1861 the office had 26 printing presses, including only 3 cylinder presses. To-day, 180 presses are in operation, and of this number 30 are web and 104 cylinder presses. Two new presses recently installed to print the Congressional Eecord cost almost as much as was paid for the entire Government Printing Office in 1861. All of the type was set by hand compositors during the Civil War. while to-day 377 composing machines, including keyboards and casters, produce nearly 7,000,000 ems of type daily to supply the Government with printing. The bindery in 1861 was equipped with 1 : 2 Annual Report of the Public Printer four minor machines, while to-day 326 machines are used in the work of the bindery alone. Some of these machines cost more each than the entire amount paid for all the machinery in the Government Printing Office 65 years ago. Only one 60-horsepower boiler was required to operate and heat the Government Printing Office in 1861, as compared with 1,500 horsepower now necessary to furnish steam heat and electric power and light. A two-horse wagon delivered all the product of the office in those days, and now 30 big motor trucks are kept busy transporting the daily output. The total expenditures of the Government Printing Office in 1861 amounted to less than half a million dollars as compared with an expenditure of nearly $12,000,000 in 1926. Such has been the tremendous growth of the Government Print- ing Office in 65 years, until to-day it has become the greatest printing establishment in the world. Even now its capacity and equipment are not sufficient to meet the rapidly increasing. requirements of the United States Government. With the approval of Congress, plans are being prepared for an addition which will increase the floor space of the main building by about 160,000 square feet and cost" approximately $1,250,000. It is hoped to complete this much-needed structure within the next two years. CELEBRATION OF SIXTY-FIFTH ANXi\-EIlSARY The sixty-fifth anniversary of the Government Printing Office was fittingly celebrated in Harding Hall on March 4, 1926, at which time congratulatory addresses were delivered by Senator George H. Moses, chairman of the Joint Committee on Printing; Senator George Wharton Pepper, chairman of the Senate Committee on Printing; and Representative Edward M. Beers, chairman of the House Committee on Printing, of Congress. There were also pres- ent at the exercises, as guests of honor, Mrs. James A. Sample and Maj. Thomas Defrees, of Washington, the daughter and the son of Hon. John D. Defrees, who was the first superintendent of the Gov- ernment Printing Office. Sharing with them the honors of the occasion were the following employees, each of whom has had more than fifty years of service in the Government Printing Office : John S. Burnside, William A. Smith, Miss Amelia Moreno, and Miss Mary E. Speisser. President Coolidge, in a letter congratulating the Government Printing Office on its sixty-fifth anniversary, wrote the Public Printer as follows The White House, Washington. Fe'bruary 2S, 1926. * * * My Dear Mr. Carter : Starting in a small way in the adminis- tration of President Lincoln, your office has come to be one of the important factors in the quick dispatch of Government business. It is said to be not only one of the largest plants of its kind in the world but also one of the most efficient. Its personnel may well be proud to maintain that record. Please extend to them my greetings and best wishes. Most sincerely yours, Calvin Coolidge. Annual Report of the Public Printer EFFICIEXCT IXCREASED IX LAST SIX TEARS In view of the tremendous growth of the Government Printing- Office during the 65 years, it is gratifying to report that in the last six years the efficiency of employees has increased and the improve- ment of equipment has been greater than during any similar period of its historv. The value of the product for the six-vear period^ 1921-1926. was computed at S66.181.938.80, as compared with $58,161,481.47 for the six years 1915-1920, the greatest production record up to that time, including, as it did, the vast amount of extra work required during the World War. This increase of more than $8,000,000 iu/ the product was made with an average of 340 fewer employees than were on the rolls during the six years 1915-1920. Further evidence of the greater efficiency of the employees during the last six years is furnished by the notable record of the typesetting machine operators, whose hourly production averages increased from 3,782 ems for linotype operators and 4,835 ems for monotype key- board operators in 1921 to 4,559 and 6,265 ems, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1926.
Recommended publications
  • Middleware in Action 2007
    Technology Assessment from Ken North Computing, LLC Middleware in Action Industrial Strength Data Access May 2007 Middleware in Action: Industrial Strength Data Access Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 2 Mature Technology .........................................................................................................3 Scalability, Interoperability, High Availability ...................................................................5 Components, XML and Services-Oriented Architecture..................................................6 Best-of-Breed Middleware...............................................................................................7 Pay Now or Pay Later .....................................................................................................7 2.0 Architectures for Distributed Computing.................................................................. 8 2.1 Leveraging Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 8 2.2 Multi-Tier, N-Tier Architecture ................................................................................. 9 2.3 Persistence, Client-Server Databases, Distributed Data ....................................... 10 Client-Server SQL Processing ......................................................................................10 Client Libraries ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Attack on Broadcast RC4
    A Practical Attack on Broadcast RC4 Itsik Mantin and Adi Shamir Computer Science Department, The Weizmann Institute, Rehovot 76100, Israel. {itsik,shamir}@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il Abstract. RC4is the most widely deployed stream cipher in software applications. In this paper we describe a major statistical weakness in RC4, which makes it trivial to distinguish between short outputs of RC4 and random strings by analyzing their second bytes. This weakness can be used to mount a practical ciphertext-only attack on RC4in some broadcast applications, in which the same plaintext is sent to multiple recipients under different keys. 1 Introduction A large number of stream ciphers were proposed and implemented over the last twenty years. Most of these ciphers were based on various combinations of linear feedback shift registers, which were easy to implement in hardware, but relatively slow in software. In 1987Ron Rivest designed the RC4 stream cipher, which was based on a different and more software friendly paradigm. It was integrated into Microsoft Windows, Lotus Notes, Apple AOCE, Oracle Secure SQL, and many other applications, and has thus become the most widely used software- based stream cipher. In addition, it was chosen to be part of the Cellular Digital Packet Data specification. Its design was kept a trade secret until 1994, when someone anonymously posted its source code to the Cypherpunks mailing list. The correctness of this unofficial description was confirmed by comparing its outputs to those produced by licensed implementations. RC4 has a secret internal state which is a permutation of all the N =2n possible n bits words.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 21-10527-JTD Doc 285 Filed 04/14/21 Page 1 of 68 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) CARBONLITE HOLDINGS LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 21-10527 (JTD) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE I, Victoria X. Tran, depose and say that I am employed by Stretto, the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned case. On April 10, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit A, and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit B: Notice of Proposed Sale or Sales of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets, Free and Clear of All Encumbrances, Other Than Assumed Liabilities, and Scheduling Final Sale Hearing Related Thereto (Docket No. 268) Notice of Proposed Assumption and Assignment of Designated Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases (Docket No. 269) Furthermore, on April 10, 2021, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of Stretto caused the following documents to be served via first-class mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit C, and via electronic mail on the service list attached hereto as Exhibit D: Notice of Proposed Sale or Sales of Substantially All of the Debtors’ Assets, Free and Clear of All Encumbrances, Other Than Assumed Liabilities, and Scheduling Final Sale Hearing Related Thereto (Docket No. 268, Pages 1-4) Notice of Proposed Assumption and Assignment of Designated Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptanalysis of Stream Ciphers Based on Arrays and Modular Addition
    KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN FACULTEIT INGENIEURSWETENSCHAPPEN DEPARTEMENT ELEKTROTECHNIEK{ESAT Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven-Heverlee Cryptanalysis of Stream Ciphers Based on Arrays and Modular Addition Promotor: Proefschrift voorgedragen tot Prof. Dr. ir. Bart Preneel het behalen van het doctoraat in de ingenieurswetenschappen door Souradyuti Paul November 2006 KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN FACULTEIT INGENIEURSWETENSCHAPPEN DEPARTEMENT ELEKTROTECHNIEK{ESAT Kasteelpark Arenberg 10, 3001 Leuven-Heverlee Cryptanalysis of Stream Ciphers Based on Arrays and Modular Addition Jury: Proefschrift voorgedragen tot Prof. Dr. ir. Etienne Aernoudt, voorzitter het behalen van het doctoraat Prof. Dr. ir. Bart Preneel, promotor in de ingenieurswetenschappen Prof. Dr. ir. Andr´eBarb´e door Prof. Dr. ir. Marc Van Barel Prof. Dr. ir. Joos Vandewalle Souradyuti Paul Prof. Dr. Lars Knudsen (Technical University, Denmark) U.D.C. 681.3*D46 November 2006 ⃝c Katholieke Universiteit Leuven { Faculteit Ingenieurswetenschappen Arenbergkasteel, B-3001 Heverlee (Belgium) Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag vermenigvuldigd en/of openbaar gemaakt worden door middel van druk, fotocopie, microfilm, elektron- isch of op welke andere wijze ook zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever. All rights reserved. No part of the publication may be reproduced in any form by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without written permission from the publisher. D/2006/7515/88 ISBN 978-90-5682-754-0 To my parents for their unyielding ambition to see me educated and Prof. Bimal Roy for making cryptology possible in my life ... My Gratitude It feels awkward to claim the thesis to be singularly mine as a great number of people, directly or indirectly, participated in the process to make it see the light of day.
    [Show full text]
  • *UPDATED Canadian Values 07-04 201 7/26/2016 4:42:21 PM *UPDATED Canadian Values 07-04 202 COIN VALUES: CANADA 02 .0 .0 12
    CANADIAN VALUES By Michael Findlay Large Cents VG-8 F-12 VF-20 EF-40 MS-60 MS-63R 1917 1.00 1.25 1.50 2.50 13. 45. CANADA COIN VALUES: 1918 1.00 1.25 1.50 2.50 13. 45. 1919 1.00 1.25 1.50 2.50 13. 45. 1920 1.00 1.25 1.50 3.00 18. 70. CANADIAN COIN VALUES Small Cents PRICE GUIDE VG-8 F-12 VF-20 EF-40 MS-60 MS-63R GEORGE V All prices are in U.S. dollars LargeL Cents C t 1920 0.20 0.35 0.75 1.50 12. 45. Canadian Coin Values is a comprehensive retail value VG-8 F-12 VF-20 EF-40 MS-60 MS-63R 1921 0.50 0.75 1.50 4.00 30. 250. guide of Canadian coins published online regularly at Coin VICTORIA 1922 20. 23. 28. 40. 200. 1200. World’s website. Canadian Coin Values is provided as a 1858 70. 90. 120. 200. 475. 1800. 1923 30. 33. 42. 55. 250. 2000. reader service to collectors desiring independent informa- 1858 Coin Turn NI NI 2500. 5000. BNE BNE 1924 6.00 8.00 11. 16. 120. 800. tion about a coin’s potential retail value. 1859 4.00 5.00 6.00 10. 50. 200. 1925 25. 28. 35. 45. 200. 900. Sources for pricing include actual transactions, public auc- 1859 Brass 16000. 22000. 30000. BNE BNE BNE 1926 3.50 4.50 7.00 12. 90. 650. tions, fi xed-price lists and any additional information acquired 1859 Dbl P 9 #1 225.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archeology of Cryptography: Rewriting Plaintext, Encryption, and Ciphertext
    An Archeology of Cryptography: Rewriting Plaintext, Encryption, and Ciphertext By Isaac Quinn DuPont A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto © Copyright by Isaac Quinn DuPont 2017 ii An Archeology of Cryptography: Rewriting Plaintext, Encryption, and Ciphertext Isaac Quinn DuPont Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Information University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Tis dissertation is an archeological study of cryptography. It questions the validity of thinking about cryptography in familiar, instrumentalist terms, and instead reveals the ways that cryptography can been understood as writing, media, and computation. In this dissertation, I ofer a critique of the prevailing views of cryptography by tracing a number of long overlooked themes in its history, including the development of artifcial languages, machine translation, media, code, notation, silence, and order. Using an archeological method, I detail historical conditions of possibility and the technical a priori of cryptography. Te conditions of possibility are explored in three parts, where I rhetorically rewrite the conventional terms of art, namely, plaintext, encryption, and ciphertext. I argue that plaintext has historically been understood as kind of inscription or form of writing, and has been associated with the development of artifcial languages, and used to analyze and investigate the natural world. I argue that the technical a priori of plaintext, encryption, and ciphertext is constitutive of the syntactic iii and semantic properties detailed in Nelson Goodman’s theory of notation, as described in his Languages of Art. I argue that encryption (and its reverse, decryption) are deterministic modes of transcription, which have historically been thought of as the medium between plaintext and ciphertext.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Extraction Tool
    ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS FOR HOME AREA NETWORKS FOR SMART GRID Mayur Anand B.E, Visveswaraiah Technological University, Karnataka, India, 2007 PROJECT Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in COMPUTER SCIENCE at CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO SPRING 2011 ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS FOR HOME AREA NETWORKS FOR SMART GRID A Project by Mayur Anand Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Isaac Ghansah, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Chung-E-Wang, Ph.D. ____________________________ Date ii Student: Mayur Anand I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the Project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ________________ Nikrouz Faroughi, Ph.D. Date Department of Computer Science iii Abstract of ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS FOR HOME AREA NETWORKS FOR SMART GRID by Mayur Anand This project discusses home area networks in Smart Grid. A Home Area Network plays a very important role in communication among various devices in a home. There are multiple technologies that are in contention to be used to implement home area networks. This project analyses various communication protocols in Home Area Networks and their corressponding underlying standards in detail. The protocols and standards covered in this project are ZigBee, Z-Wave, IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11. Only wireless protocols have been discussed and evaluated. Various security threats present in the protocols mentioned above along with the counter measures to most of the threats have been discussed as well.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Syntax Isaac Quinn Dupont Facult
    Proceedings of the 2011 Great Lakes Connections Conference—Full Papers Email: A History of Syntax Isaac Quinn DuPont Faculty of Information University of Toronto [email protected] Abstract the arrangement of word tokens in an appropriate Email is important. Email has been and remains a (orderly) manner for processing by computers. Per- “killer app” for personal and corporate correspond- haps “computers” refers to syntactical processing, ence. To date, no academic or exhaustive history of making my definition circular. So be it, I will hide email exists, and likewise, very few authors have behind the engineer’s keystone of pragmatism. Email attempted to understand critical issues of email. This systems work (usually), because syntax is arranged paper explores the history of email syntax: from its such that messages can be passed. origins in time-sharing computers through Request This paper demonstrates the centrality of for Comments (RFCs) standardization. In this histori- syntax to the history of email, and investigates inter- cal capacity, this paper addresses several prevalent esting socio–technical issues that arise from the par- historical mistakes, but does not attempt an exhaus- ticular development of email syntax. Syntax is an tive historiography. Further, as part of the rejection important constraint for contemporary computers, of “mainstream” historiographical methodologies this perhaps even a definitional quality. Additionally, as paper explores a critical theory of email syntax. It is machines, computers are physically constructed. argued that the ontology of email syntax is material, Thus, email syntax is material. This is a radical view but contingent and obligatory—and in a techno– for the academy, but (I believe), unproblematic for social assemblage.
    [Show full text]
  • "Knowledge Will Be Manifold": Daniel 12.4 and the Idea of Intellectual Progress in the Middle Ages J
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University History Faculty Publications History Department 2014 "Knowledge Will Be Manifold": Daniel 12.4 and the Idea of Intellectual Progress in the Middle Ages J. R. Webb Bridgewater State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/history_fac Part of the History Commons, and the Medieval Studies Commons Virtual Commons Citation Webb, J. R. (2014). "Knowledge Will Be Manifold": Daniel 12.4 and the Idea of Intellectual Progress in the Middle Ages. In History Faculty Publications. Paper 38. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/history_fac/38 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. “Knowledge Will Be Manifold”: Daniel 12.4 and the Idea of Intellectual Progress in the Middle Ages By J. R. Webb Je l’offre [ce livre] surtout a` mes critiques, a` ceux qui voudront bien le corriger, l’ameliorer,´ le refaire, le mettre au niveau des progres` ulterieurs´ de la science. “Plurimi pertransibunt, et multiplex erit scientia.” (Jules Michelet, Histoire de France, 1, 1833) Thus wrote Michelet to open his monumental history of France. By deploying this prophetic line from the book of Daniel in support of a positivistic approach to historical science, he was participating in a discourse on this perplexing passage that spanned nearly two millennia. He perhaps surmised this, though he probably did not know how deeply the passage penetrated into the intellectual tradition of the West or that he was favoring one interpretation of it over another.1 It is the trajectory of the interpretations of Daniel 12.4 in the Latin West from their first formulation in late antiquity that concerns the present exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers to Exercises
    Answers to Exercises A bird does not sing because he has an answer, he sings because he has a song. —Chinese Proverb Intro.1: abstemious, abstentious, adventitious, annelidous, arsenious, arterious, face- tious, sacrilegious. Intro.2: When a software house has a popular product they tend to come up with new versions. A user can update an old version to a new one, and the update usually comes as a compressed file on a floppy disk. Over time the updates get bigger and, at a certain point, an update may not fit on a single floppy. This is why good compression is important in the case of software updates. The time it takes to compress and decompress the update is unimportant since these operations are typically done just once. Recently, software makers have taken to providing updates over the Internet, but even in such cases it is important to have small files because of the download times involved. 1.1: (1) ask a question, (2) absolutely necessary, (3) advance warning, (4) boiling hot, (5) climb up, (6) close scrutiny, (7) exactly the same, (8) free gift, (9) hot water heater, (10) my personal opinion, (11) newborn baby, (12) postponed until later, (13) unexpected surprise, (14) unsolved mysteries. 1.2: A reasonable way to use them is to code the five most-common strings in the text. Because irreversible text compression is a special-purpose method, the user may know what strings are common in any particular text to be compressed. The user may specify five such strings to the encoder, and they should also be written at the start of the output stream, for the decoder’s use.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Book Topics July-August 2017
    Talking Book Topics July–August 2017 Volume 83, Number 4 About Talking Book Topics Talking Book Topics is published bimonthly in audio, large-print, and online formats and distributed at no cost to participants in the Library of Congress reading program for people who are blind or have a physical disability. An abridged version is distributed in braille. This periodical lists digital talking books and magazines available through a network of cooperating libraries and carries news of developments and activities in services to people who are blind, visually impaired, or cannot read standard print material because of an organic physical disability. The annotated list in this issue is limited to titles recently added to the national collection, which contains thousands of fiction and nonfiction titles, including bestsellers, classics, biographies, romance novels, mysteries, and how-to guides. Some books in Spanish are also available. To explore the wide range of books in the national collection, visit the NLS Union Catalog online at www.loc.gov/nls or contact your local cooperating library. Talking Book Topics is also available in large print from your local cooperating library and in downloadable audio files on the NLS Braille and Audio Reading Download (BARD) site at https://nlsbard.loc.gov. An abridged version is available to subscribers of Braille Book Review. Library of Congress, Washington 2017 Catalog Card Number 60-46157 ISSN 0039-9183 About BARD Most books and magazines listed in Talking Book Topics are available to eligible readers for download. To use BARD, contact your cooperating library or visit https://nlsbard.loc.gov for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Sources of Randomness Within Discrete Gaussian Sampling
    An Investigation of Sources of Randomness Within Discrete Gaussian Sampling S´eamus Brannigan1, Neil Smyth1, Tobias Oder2, Felipe Valencia3, Elizabeth O'Sullivan1, Tim G¨uneysu4 and Francesco Regazzoni3 1 Centre for Secure Information Technologies (CSIT), Queen's University Belfast, UK 2 Horst G¨ortzInstitute for IT-Security, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany 3 Advanced Learning and Research Institute, Universit`adella Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland 4 Universit¨atBremen, Germany Abstract. This paper presents a performance and statistical analysis of random number gener- ators and discrete Gaussian samplers implemented in software. Most Lattice-based cryptographic schemes utilise discrete Gaussian sampling and will require a quality random source. We examine a range of candidates for this purpose, including NIST DRBGs, stream ciphers and well-known PRNGs. The performance of these random sources is analysed within 64-bit implementations of Bernoulli, CDT and Ziggurat sampling. In addition we perform initial statistical testing of these samplers and include an investigation into improper seeding issues and their effect on the Gaussian samplers. Of the NIST approved Deterministic Random Bit Generators (DRBG), the AES based CTR-DRBG produced the best balanced performance in our tests. 1 Introduction Lattice-Based Cryptography is currently one of the leading contenders for Post-Quantum Cryptogra- phy. Cryptographic constructions for encryption, digital signatures and key exchange based on hard problems in Lattices are likely to be submitted to the current NIST call for Post-Quantum algo- rithms [1]. Major efforts are in place to produce practical implementations in both hardware and soft- ware of the available and future algorithms. It is essential that these implementations are examined by the cryptographic and security engineering communities to build a level of confidence in the algorithms over the course of the submission and evaluation periods.
    [Show full text]