DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Ainslie, George 1992: Picoeconomics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). — 2001: Breakdown of Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Alloy, Lauren and Lyn Abramson, 1979: ‘Judgment of Contingency in Depressed and Nondepressed Students: Sadder but Wiser?’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, pp. 441-85. Amis, Kingsley, 1956: Lucky Jim (London: Gollancz). Anscombe, G.E.M. 1963: Intention, Second Edition (Oxford: Basil Blackwell). Anthony, Louise 1993: ‘Quine as Feminist: the Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology’, in Louise Anthony and Charlotte Witt (edd.) A Mind of One’s Own (Bolder: Westview Press) pp. 185–225. –– 2000: ‘Naturalized Epistemology, Morality and the Real World’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. Vol. 26, pp. 103–37. Arpaly, Nomy 2000: ‘On Acting Rationally Against One’s Best Judgement’ Ethics 110, pp. 488–513. Austin, J.L. 1956: ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society reprinted in his Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), pp. 123-52. Bach, Kent 1995: ‘Review of George Ainslie’s Picoeconomics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 pp. 981–3. Bandura, Albert, 1992: ‘Exercise of Personal Agency Through the Self-Efficacy Mechanism’ in R. Schwarzer (ed.), Self-Efficacy (Bristol PA: Taylor and Francis,) pp. 3–38. Bargh, John: 2002: ‘Losing Consciousness’, Journal of Consumer Research 29 pp. 280–5. — and Tanya Chartrand 1999: ‘The Unbearable Automaticity of Being’ American Psychologist 54 pp. 462–79. Baumeister, Roy 1996: Evil (New York: W. H. Freeman). Baumeister, Roy, Ellen Bratslavsky, Mark Muraven and Diane Tice, 1998: ‘Ego-depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 pp. 1252–65. —1— Baumeister, Roy, Todd Heatherton and Diane Tice, 1994: Losing Control (San Diego: Academic Press). Baumeister, Roy, E. Masicampo and C. Nathan DeWall, Forthcoming: ‘Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free: Manipulating Disbelief in Free Will Increases Aggression and Reduces Helpfulness’. Bayne, Tim 2006: ‘Phenomenology and the Feeling of Doing’ in Susan Pockett, William Banks and Shaun Gallagher (edd.) Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? (Cambridge: MIT Press) pp. 169– 85. Bechara, Antoine, Antonio Damasio, Hanna Damasio, and Steven Anderson 1994: ‘Insensitivity to Future Consequences Following Damage to Human Prefrontal Cortex’ Cognition 50, pp. 7– 15. Bechara, Antoine, Hanna Damasio, Daniel Tranel, and Antonio Damasio, 1997: ‘Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy’ Science 275, pp. 1293–1295. Bechara, Antoine, Daniel Tranel, Hanna Damasio and Antonio Damasio 1996: ‘Failure to Respond Autonomically to Anticipated Future Outcomes Following Damage to Prefrontal Cortex’ Cerebral Cortex 6, pp. 215–225. Bem, Daryl 1972: ‘Self-Perception Theory’ Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6 pp. 1–62. Berridge, Kent 2004: ‘Pleasure, Unfelt Affect and Irrational Desire’ in A. Manstead, N. Frijda and A. Fischer (edd.) Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 243–262. — 2007a: ‘The Debate over Dopamine’s Role in Reward: the Case for Incentive Salience’ Psychopharmacology 191, pp. 391–431. — 2007b: ‘Brain Reward Systems for Food Incentives and Hedonics in Normal Appetite and Eating Disorders’ in T.C Kirkham and S. Cooper (edd.) Progress in Brain Research: Appetite and Body Weight (New York: Academic Press). Bigelow, John, Susan Dodds, and Robert Pargetter, 1990: ‘Temptation and the Will’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 pp. 39-49. Bobzien, Susanne, 1998: Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Boswell, James, 1790: The Life of Samuel Johnson (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson (Everyman’s Library), 1992). Bratman, Michael 1985: “Davidson’s Theory of Intention,” in B. Vermazen and M. Hintikka (edd.) Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 13-26. —2— — 1987: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. — 1992: ‘Practical Reason and Acceptance in a Context’, Mind 101 pp. 1–15; reprinted in (Bratman, 1999) pp. 15–34. — 1996: ‘Planning and Temptation’ in Larry May, Marilyn Friedman and Andy Clark (edd.), Minds and Morals (Cambridge MA: MIT Press) pp. 293–310; reprinted in (Bratman, 1999) pp. 35–57. –– 1998: ‘Toxin, Temptation and the Stability of Intention’, in Jules Coleman and Christopher Morris (edd.), Rational Commitment and Social Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 59–83; reprinted in (Bratman, 1999) pp. 58–90. –– 1999: Faces of Intention. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). — 2006: ‘Temptation Revisited’ in Structures of Agency (New York: Oxford University Press) pp. 257– 82. —Forthcoming: ‘Intention, Belief, Practical, Theoretical’, forthcoming in Jens Timmerman, John Skorupski, and Simon Robertson, (edd.) Spheres of Reason. Brehm, Jack 1956: ‘Postdecisional changes in the desirability of alternatives’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology 52 pp. 384–9. Broome, John 2001: ‘Are intentions reasons? And how should we cope with incommensurable values?’ in C. Morris and A. Ripstein (edd.) Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 98–120. Budescu, David and Thomas Wallsten 1995: ‘Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical Evidence’, in J. Busmeyer, D. Meldin and R. Hastie (edd.) Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective (San Diego: Academic Press), pp. 275–318. Byatt, A.S. 1989: Possession: a Romance (London: Chatto and Windus). Campbell, C.A., 1939: ‘The Psychology of Effort of Will’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40 pp. 49–74. Carver, Charles and Michael Scheier, 1998: On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Chang, Ruth (ed.) 1997: Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press). Charniak, Eugene 1991: ‘Bayesian Networks without Tears’, AI Magazine 12, pp. 50–63. —3— Chater, Nick, Joshua Tenenbaum and Alan Yuille 2006: ‘Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Conceptual Foundations’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, pp. 287–91. Chichester, Francis, 1964: The Lonely Sea and the Sky (London: Hodder and Stoughton). Christensen, David 1996: ‘Dutch Books Depragmatized: Epistemic Consistency for Partial Believers’, Journal of Philosophy 93, pp. 450–79. Collins, Anthony 1717: A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty Second Edition, ed. J. O’Higgins, (The Hague: Martinus Nijoff, 1976). Cook Wilson, John 1879: Aristotelian Studies I (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Cooper, Joel 2007: Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory (London: Sage). Cordner, Christopher 1985: ‘Jackson on Weakness of Will.’ Mind 94, pp. 273-80. Damasio, Antonio 1994: Descartes’ Error (New York: Putnam). Davidson, Donald 1963: ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’ The Journal of Philosophy, 60, pp. 685-700. Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 3–20 — 1969: ‘How is Weakness of the Will Possible?’ in J. Feinberg (ed.) Moral Concepts (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 93–113. Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 21–42 —1978: ‘Intending’ in Y. Yovel (ed.) Philosophy of History and Action (Dordrecht: Reidel). Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 83–102 —1980: Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press) DeHelian, Laura and Edward McClennen 1993: ‘Planning and the Stability of Intention: A Comment’, Minds and Machines 3, pp. 319–33. Dijksterhuis, Ap, Maarten Bos, Loran Nordgren, and Rick van Baaren 2006: ‘On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect’ Science, 311, pp. 1005–7. Donagan, Alan 1987: Choice: The Essential Element in Human Action (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul). Elster, Jon 1979: Ulysses and the Sirens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Fairbrother, W.A. 1897: ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Incontinence—A Contribution to Practical Ethics’ Mind 6, pp. 359–70. Fischer, John Martin 1994: The Metaphysics of Free Will (Oxford, Blackwell). —4— Flaubert, Gustave 1857: Madame Bovary, trans. Geoffrey Wall (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1992). Fodor, Jerry, 1983: Modularity of Mind (Cambridge MA: MIT Press). Frankish, Keith, Forthcoming: ‘Partial Belief and Flat-out Belief’, in F. Huber and C. Schmidt- Petri (edd.), Degrees of Belief, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) Gauthier, David 1994: ‘Assure and Threaten’ Ethics 104: 690–721. –– 1996: ‘Commitment and Choice: An Essay on the Rationality of Plans.’ In F. Frain, F. Hahn and S. Vannucci (edd.) Ethics, Rationality and Economic Behaviour, (Oxford: Clarendon Press) pp. 217–243. –– 1997: ‘Resolute Choice and Rational Deliberation: A Critique and a Defense’, Noûs 31, pp. 1– 25. Godden, Rumer 1975: The Peacock Spring (London: Macmillan). Gollwitzer, Peter 1993: ‘Goal achievement: The role of intentions’, in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (edd.), European review of social psychology 4, pp. 141-185. — 1996: ‘The Volitional Benefits of Planning’ in Peter Gollwitzer and John Bargh (edd.), The Psychology of Action (New York: Guilford Press) pp. 287–312 — 1999: ‘Implementation Intentions: The Strong Effect of Simple Goals’ American Psychologist 54 (1999) pp. 493–503 — 2003: ‘Why we thought the action mindsets affect illusions of control’, Psychological Inquiry, 14, pp. 259-267. Gollwitzer, Peter and Ute Bayer, 1999: ‘Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action’ in S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (edd.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (New York: Guilford) pp. 403-422. Gollwitzer, Peter, Ute
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Experience of Doing’
    Phenomenology and the Feeling of Doing: 1 Wegner on the Conscious Will Tim Bayne, Macquarie University [email protected] February 24, 2005 To appear in S. Pockett, W. P. Banks & S. Gallagher (eds) Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? An Investigation of the Nature of Volition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Abstract In this paper I examine Daniel Wegner’s claim that the conscious will is an illusion. I begin by asking what Wegner might mean by “the conscious will”, and what he might mean by calling it an illusion. I then explore Wegner’s arguments for the claim that the conscious will is an illusion. I conclude that these arguments fail, and that although there is much we do not yet know about the structure of the phenomenology of agency, it is unlikely that the phenomenology of agency is illusory. 1. Introduction Given its ubiquitous presence in everyday experience, it is surprising that the phenomenology of doing—the experience of being an agent—has received such scant attention in the consciousness literature. But things are starting to change, and a small but growing literature on the content and causes of the phenomenology of first-person agency is beginning to emerge.2 One of the most influential and stimulating figures in this literature is Daniel Wegner. In a series of papers and his book The Illusion of Conscious Will (ICW) Wegner has developed an account of what he calls “the experience of conscious will”. In this paper I assess Wegner’s model of the conscious will and the claims that he makes on the basis of it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sense of Conscious Will
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2004) 27, 649–692 Printed in the United States of America Précis of The illusion of conscious will Daniel M. Wegner Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. [email protected] http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~wegner/ Abstract: The experience of conscious will is the feeling that we are doing things. This feeling occurs for many things we do, conveying to us again and again the sense that we consciously cause our actions. But the feeling may not be a true reading of what is happening in our minds, brains, and bodies as our actions are produced. The feeling of conscious will can be fooled. This happens in clinical disorders such as alien hand syndrome, dissociative identity disorder, and schizophrenic auditory hallucinations. And in people without disorders, phenomena such as hypnosis, automatic writing, Ouija board spelling, water dowsing, facilitated communication, speaking in tongues, spirit possession, and trance channeling also illustrate anomalies of will – cases when actions occur without will or will occurs without action. This book brings these cases together with research evidence from laboratories in psychology to explore a theory of apparent mental causation. According to this theory, when a thought appears in consciousness just prior to an action, is consistent with the action, and appears exclusive of salient alternative causes of the action, we experience conscious will and ascribe authorship to ourselves for the action. Experiences of conscious will thus arise from processes whereby the mind interprets itself – not from processes whereby mind creates action. Conscious will, in this view, is an indication that we think we have caused an action, not a revelation of the causal sequence by which the action was produced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology of Gullibility
    What is is FABBS? FABBS? The Foundation for the Advancement of Behavioral and Brain Sci- ences (FABBS) is an educational non-profit organization established to promote and enhance understanding of the behavioral, psychologi- cal, and brain sciences. cal, and brain sciences. The mission of the foundation is education directed to two important Theaudiences: mission the of publicthe foundation and researchers. is education Our directedfirst goal, to totwo enhance important the S C I E N C E C A F É audiences:public’s understanding the public and of scientific researchers. research, Our first is accomplished goal, to enhance through the educational programming and publications designed for non- public’s understanding of scientific research, is accomplished through scientists. Our second goal, to facilitate the engagement of scientists ineducational productive programming dialogue that willand improvepublications and expeditedesigned activities for non- re- Will People latedscientists. to research, Our second is met goal, through to facilitate the organization the engagement of conferences of scientists and seminarsin productive geared dialogue towards that communication will improve and and expedite interaction activities between re- Believe Anything? thoselated toinvolved research, in theis met research through process. the organization of conferences and The Psychology of Gullibility Theseminars end products geared towardsof the successful communication fulfillment and of interactionour efforts includebetween a societythose involved that is inbetter the researchequipped process. to understand the complex, scientific issues that are becoming a daily part of modern life, and a well- informedThe end products research of community the successful that fulfillmentis prepared of to our advance efforts their include field a October 10, 2008 societybeyond thatcurrent is better expectations equipped and to capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Wegner, the Illusion of Conscious Will (Cambridge MA: the MIT Press, 2002), Pp
    Daniel Wegner, The Illusion of Conscious Will (Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2002), pp. xi + 405. Anyone who retains the Cartesian faith that we know what we are doing should read this book. Wegner assembles a huge amount of evidence to show our widespread ignorance of when and how we are acting. Our failures are of two kinds. First there are cases in which we are acting but do not realize that we are. Examples include ouija board manipulation and other varieties of Victorian spiritualism; facilitated communication; water divination; and hypnotism, to which Wegner devotes a long chapter that would serve as an excellent introduction to the topic. Second come cases in which we are not acting, but think that we are. Wegner describes an experiment of his own (the ‘I-Spy’ study) in which subjects are induced to believe that they have selected a figure on a computer screen (when they haven’t) by the expedient of getting them to think about that figure a few seconds before. Perhaps such cases are unusual; more common are cases in which we are indeed acting, but in which we think that our actions are achieving far more than they in fact are. We habitually overestimate the effect that we have on objects and people around us. Indeed there is good evidence from many studies that it is a sign of mental health to overestimate one’s control over the world. If this weren’t bad enough, it also appears that, even if we do accurately understand our actions at the time, we are very likely to likely to forget or confabulate later.
    [Show full text]
  • Final TMR For
    Transactive Memory Reconstructed: Rethinking Wegner’s Research Program BRYCE HUEBNER Bryce Huebner is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Georgetown University. His research primarily focuses on issues in in the philosophy of the cognitive, biological, and social sciences. He is the author of Macrocognition: A theory of distributed minds and collective intentionality (Oxford University Press, 2014), as well as several articles addressing issues the structure of human agency, the kinds of minds we find in our world, and the implications of cognitive scientific research for ethical theorizing. Abstract: In this paper, I argue that recent research on episodic memory supports a limited defense of the phenomena that Daniel Wegner has termed transactive memory. Building on psychological and neurological research, targeting both individual and shared memory, I argue that individuals can collaboratively work to construct shared episodic memories. In some cases, this yields memories that are distributed across multiple individuals, instead of being housed in individual brains. When we first met Otto, he was experiencing early symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (Clark & Chalmers 1998). Although he had lived in the same apartment since the 1970s, he was having a hard time getting around his beloved city. But he could still remember where to look for information, even when he couldn't remember where things were. This allowed him to use a notebook to get around. When he decided to see an exhibit at the MOMA, he could check his notebook to see where the museum was, and set out with his notebook in hand. David Chalmers (2008) has recently claimed that many people rely on iPhones in a similar way.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Conscious Will an Illusion?*
    Disputatio 16, May 2004 Is conscious will an illusion?* Jing Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences Abstract In this essay I critically examine Daniel Wegner’s account of conscious will as an illusion developed in his book The Illusion of Conscious Will (MIT Press, 2002). I show that there are unwarranted leaps in his argument, which con- siderably decrease the empirical plausibility and theoretical adequacy of his account. Moreover, some features essential to our experience of willing, which are related to our general understanding of free will, moral responsi- bility and human agency, are largely left out in Wegner’s account of conscious will. This substantially diminishes its implications and significance for some profound philosophical issues. 1. Introduction Normally, we have the experience that we consciously will what we do: we are the authors or originators who make our actions happen. Actions are generally understood as what we voluntarily do, perform or bring about, instead of what we undergo or merely happen to us. We do things, and when we do them, we experience the actions as coming * I would like to thank Andrei Buckareff for many helpful comments on the first draft of this essay. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at The 95th Annual Meeting of the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, on April 17, 2003, in Atlanta, Georgia, 2003’ APA Central Division Meeting, on April 25, 2003, in Cleveland, Ohio, and The 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, on June 19, 2003, in Pasadena, California. I am grateful to the audiences for valuable feedback, and especially, to Eddy Nahmias and Thomas Polger, who were my commentators respectively at the latter two meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Open LATEST LAST.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Information Sciences and Technology DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSACTIVE MEMORY SYSTEM PROTOTYPE FOR GEO-COLLABORATIVE CRISIS MANAGEMENT A Thesis in Information Sciences and Technology by Varun Adibhatla 2008 Varun Adibhatla Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science August 2008 ii The thesis of Varun Adibhatla was reviewed and approved* by the following: Michael McNeese Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Thesis Advisor David Hall Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Gerald Santoro Assistant Professor of Information Sciences and Technology John Yen Professor of Information Sciences and Technology Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Programs of Information Sciences and Technology *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Crisis management in today's technologically mediated world is a challenging task that requires the encoding, storing and retrieval of large amounts of knowledge and information far beyond the capabilities of the individual mind. Systems developed to serve the information needs of crisis management should therefore accommodate the distributed nature of work in this context. Crisis management personnel often work in teams and their activities are shaped based on their interactions with each other as well as their environment. Moreover, crisis management teams tend to develop idiosyncrasies in organizing their own knowledge thereby hindering future possibilities of communication or coordination with external agencies. Keeping this in mind, the research described in this thesis considers the cognitive activities of the team in designing relevant technology for crisis management. Transactive memory is a theory put forward by Daniel Wegner in an effort to understand the group mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Conscious Will an Illusion?
    Is Conscious Will an Illusion? Jing Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences Disputatio No. 8 May 2004 DOI: 10.2478/disp-2004-0004 ISSN: 0873-626X © 2004 Zhu. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License Disputatio 16, May 2004 Is conscious will an illusion?* Jing Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences Abstract In this essay I critically examine Daniel Wegner’s account of conscious will as an illusion developed in his book The Illusion of Conscious Will (MIT Press, 2002). I show that there are unwarranted leaps in his argument, which con- siderably decrease the empirical plausibility and theoretical adequacy of his account. Moreover, some features essential to our experience of willing, which are related to our general understanding of free will, moral responsi- bility and human agency, are largely left out in Wegner’s account of conscious will. This substantially diminishes its implications and significance for some profound philosophical issues. 1. Introduction Normally, we have the experience that we consciously will what we do: we are the authors or originators who make our actions happen. Actions are generally understood as what we voluntarily do, perform or bring about, instead of what we undergo or merely happen to us. We do things, and when we do them, we experience the actions as coming * I would like to thank Andrei Buckareff for many helpful comments on the first draft of this essay. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at The 95th Annual Meeting of the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, on April 17, 2003, in Atlanta, Georgia, 2003’ APA Central Division Meeting, on April 25, 2003, in Cleveland, Ohio, and The 29th Annual Meeting of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, on June 19, 2003, in Pasadena, California.
    [Show full text]
  • VITA Robin R. Vallacher
    VITA Robin R. Vallacher Department of Psychology Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Phone: (561) 297-3371 E-Mail: [email protected] FAX: (561) 297-2160 WEB: www.psy.fau.edu/~vallacher http://web.me.com/vallacher Education B.A. San Diego State University, 1969 (B.A. with Highest Honors; Phi Kappa Phi) M.A. Michigan State University, 1972 Ph.D. Michigan State University, 1975 (NSF Trainee, 1970-1974) Professional Experience • Navy Medical Neuropsychiatric Research Unit, San Diego, California, summers, 1970, 1971 • Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, 1975-1985 • Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, 1985 to date • Research Affiliate, Center for Complex Systems, University of Warsaw, Poland, 1997 to date • Research Affiliate, Advanced Consortium on Cooperation, Conflict, and Complexity, Columbia University, 2008 to date • Visiting Scholar: o Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, 1982 o Psychological Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland, 1990 o Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich, Germany, 1992 o Department of Psychology, University of Montpellier 1, France, 2007 Membership in Professional Organizations • American Association for the Advancement of Science • Association for Psychological Science (Fellow) • American Psychological Association • International Association of Conflict Management • North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity • Society of Experimental Social Psychology • Society for Personality and
    [Show full text]
  • Communication in Theory and Research on Transactive Memory Systems: a Literature Review
    Topics in Cognitive Science (2018) 1–24 © 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN:1756-8765 online DOI: 10.1111/tops.12359 This article is part of the topic “Remembering Through Conversations,” Lucas Bietti and Charles Stone (Topic Editors). For a full listing of topic papers, see http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1756-8765/earlyview Communication in Theory and Research on Transactive Memory Systems: A Literature Review Vesa Peltokorpi,a Anthony C. Hoodb aSchool of Management, Operations and Marketing, University of Wollongong bDepartment of Management, Information Systems and Quantitative Methods, Collat School of Business, University of Alabama at Birmingham Received 29 June 2017; received in revised form 3 May 2018; accepted 21 May 2018 Abstract Transactive memory systems (TMS) theory has attracted considerable attention in the scholarly fields of cognitive, organizational, and social psychology; communication; information science; and management. A central theme underlying and connecting these scholarly fields has been the role of interpersonal communication in explaining how members of dyads, groups, and teams learn “who knows what,” specialize in different information domains, and retrieve information from domain experts. However, because theoretical and empirical evidence is scattered across related, yet distinct scholarly fields, it is difficult to determine how and why communication influences TMS and related outcomes. Thus, this paper reviews literature on the relationships between communication, TMS, and outcomes in dyads, groups, and teams, and proposes avenues for future research. Keywords: Communication; Transactive memory systems 1. Introduction Transactive memory systems (TMS) theory (Wegner, 1986, 1995; Wegner, Giuliano, & Hertel, 1985) has attracted increased attention in various scholarly fields (for literature Correspondence should be sent to Vesa Peltokorpi, Faculty of Business, School of Management, Opera- tions and Marketing, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illusion of Conscious Will
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2004) 27, 649–692 Printed in the United States of America Précis of The illusion of conscious will Daniel M. Wegner Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. [email protected] http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~wegner/ Abstract: The experience of conscious will is the feeling that we are doing things. This feeling occurs for many things we do, conveying to us again and again the sense that we consciously cause our actions. But the feeling may not be a true reading of what is happening in our minds, brains, and bodies as our actions are produced. The feeling of conscious will can be fooled. This happens in clinical disorders such as alien hand syndrome, dissociative identity disorder, and schizophrenic auditory hallucinations. And in people without disorders, phenomena such as hypnosis, automatic writing, Ouija board spelling, water dowsing, facilitated communication, speaking in tongues, spirit possession, and trance channeling also illustrate anomalies of will – cases when actions occur without will or will occurs without action. This book brings these cases together with research evidence from laboratories in psychology to explore a theory of apparent mental causation. According to this theory, when a thought appears in consciousness just prior to an action, is consistent with the action, and appears exclusive of salient alternative causes of the action, we experience conscious will and ascribe authorship to ourselves for the action. Experiences of conscious will thus arise from processes whereby the mind interprets itself – not from processes whereby mind creates action. Conscious will, in this view, is an indication that we think we have caused an action, not a revelation of the causal sequence by which the action was produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Pushing the Boundaries of the Google Effect: the Effects of Reliability and Familiarity on Offloading
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ Pushing the Boundaries of the Google Effect: The Effects of Reliability and Familiarity on Offloading A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in PSYCHOLOGY by Joel Nathaniel Schooler September 2020 The Dissertation of Joel Nathaniel Schooler is approved: Associate Professor, Benjamin Storm, Chair Professor Stephen Whittaker Professor Alan Kawamoto Quentin Williams Interim Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies. Table of Contents Table of Contents iii List of Figures iv Abstract v Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 Biological memory 2 External Memory 4 Transactive Memory 5 Studies on offloading and transactive memory 6 The Google Effect 8 Experiment 1 12 Participants 14 Materials 15 Procedure 16 Practice Phase 16 Experimental Phase 17 Results 18 Discussion 20 Experiment 2 22 Participants 23 Materials 24 Procedure 25 Survey Phase 25 Practice Phase 25 Experimental Phase 26 Results 27 Rank Order Effects 29 Likert Rating Effects 30 iii Is familiarity correlated with saved status? 31 Is the topic of the fact affected by saved status? 32 Discussion 33 General Discussion 35 Conclusion 40 Appendix 42 Facts used 44 References 50 List of Figures Figure 1: Participants showed the Google Effect in the reliable condition but did not show this effect in the unreliable condition. ............................................................... 20 Figure 2: Shows the comparison of Median Familiarity Ranking by Status on the average percent recall. .............................................................................................. 31 Figure 3 This graph shows the interaction between saved status and topic on the average recall percentage ......................................................................................... 33 Figure 4: an example of what the system said when a fact was deleted .................
    [Show full text]