Bibliography

Bibliography

Bibliography Ainslie, George 1992: Picoeconomics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). — 2001: Breakdown of Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Alloy, Lauren and Lyn Abramson, 1979: ‘Judgment of Contingency in Depressed and Nondepressed Students: Sadder but Wiser?’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 108, pp. 441-85. Amis, Kingsley, 1956: Lucky Jim (London: Gollancz). Anscombe, G.E.M. 1963: Intention, Second Edition (Oxford: Basil Blackwell). Anthony, Louise 1993: ‘Quine as Feminist: the Radical Import of Naturalized Epistemology’, in Louise Anthony and Charlotte Witt (edd.) A Mind of One’s Own (Bolder: Westview Press) pp. 185–225. –– 2000: ‘Naturalized Epistemology, Morality and the Real World’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. Vol. 26, pp. 103–37. Arpaly, Nomy 2000: ‘On Acting Rationally Against One’s Best Judgement’ Ethics 110, pp. 488–513. Austin, J.L. 1956: ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society reprinted in his Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961), pp. 123-52. Bach, Kent 1995: ‘Review of George Ainslie’s Picoeconomics’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 pp. 981–3. Bandura, Albert, 1992: ‘Exercise of Personal Agency Through the Self-Efficacy Mechanism’ in R. Schwarzer (ed.), Self-Efficacy (Bristol PA: Taylor and Francis,) pp. 3–38. Bargh, John: 2002: ‘Losing Consciousness’, Journal of Consumer Research 29 pp. 280–5. — and Tanya Chartrand 1999: ‘The Unbearable Automaticity of Being’ American Psychologist 54 pp. 462–79. Baumeister, Roy 1996: Evil (New York: W. H. Freeman). Baumeister, Roy, Ellen Bratslavsky, Mark Muraven and Diane Tice, 1998: ‘Ego-depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74 pp. 1252–65. —1— Baumeister, Roy, Todd Heatherton and Diane Tice, 1994: Losing Control (San Diego: Academic Press). Baumeister, Roy, E. Masicampo and C. Nathan DeWall, Forthcoming: ‘Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free: Manipulating Disbelief in Free Will Increases Aggression and Reduces Helpfulness’. Bayne, Tim 2006: ‘Phenomenology and the Feeling of Doing’ in Susan Pockett, William Banks and Shaun Gallagher (edd.) Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? (Cambridge: MIT Press) pp. 169– 85. Bechara, Antoine, Antonio Damasio, Hanna Damasio, and Steven Anderson 1994: ‘Insensitivity to Future Consequences Following Damage to Human Prefrontal Cortex’ Cognition 50, pp. 7– 15. Bechara, Antoine, Hanna Damasio, Daniel Tranel, and Antonio Damasio, 1997: ‘Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy’ Science 275, pp. 1293–1295. Bechara, Antoine, Daniel Tranel, Hanna Damasio and Antonio Damasio 1996: ‘Failure to Respond Autonomically to Anticipated Future Outcomes Following Damage to Prefrontal Cortex’ Cerebral Cortex 6, pp. 215–225. Bem, Daryl 1972: ‘Self-Perception Theory’ Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6 pp. 1–62. Berridge, Kent 2004: ‘Pleasure, Unfelt Affect and Irrational Desire’ in A. Manstead, N. Frijda and A. Fischer (edd.) Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 243–262. — 2007a: ‘The Debate over Dopamine’s Role in Reward: the Case for Incentive Salience’ Psychopharmacology 191, pp. 391–431. — 2007b: ‘Brain Reward Systems for Food Incentives and Hedonics in Normal Appetite and Eating Disorders’ in T.C Kirkham and S. Cooper (edd.) Progress in Brain Research: Appetite and Body Weight (New York: Academic Press). Bigelow, John, Susan Dodds, and Robert Pargetter, 1990: ‘Temptation and the Will’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 27 pp. 39-49. Bobzien, Susanne, 1998: Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Boswell, James, 1790: The Life of Samuel Johnson (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson (Everyman’s Library), 1992). Bratman, Michael 1985: “Davidson’s Theory of Intention,” in B. Vermazen and M. Hintikka (edd.) Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 13-26. —2— — 1987: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. — 1992: ‘Practical Reason and Acceptance in a Context’, Mind 101 pp. 1–15; reprinted in (Bratman, 1999) pp. 15–34. — 1996: ‘Planning and Temptation’ in Larry May, Marilyn Friedman and Andy Clark (edd.), Minds and Morals (Cambridge MA: MIT Press) pp. 293–310; reprinted in (Bratman, 1999) pp. 35–57. –– 1998: ‘Toxin, Temptation and the Stability of Intention’, in Jules Coleman and Christopher Morris (edd.), Rational Commitment and Social Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 59–83; reprinted in (Bratman, 1999) pp. 58–90. –– 1999: Faces of Intention. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). — 2006: ‘Temptation Revisited’ in Structures of Agency (New York: Oxford University Press) pp. 257– 82. —Forthcoming: ‘Intention, Belief, Practical, Theoretical’, forthcoming in Jens Timmerman, John Skorupski, and Simon Robertson, (edd.) Spheres of Reason. Brehm, Jack 1956: ‘Postdecisional changes in the desirability of alternatives’ Journal of Abnormal Psychology 52 pp. 384–9. Broome, John 2001: ‘Are intentions reasons? And how should we cope with incommensurable values?’ in C. Morris and A. Ripstein (edd.) Practical Rationality and Preference: Essays for David Gauthier, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 98–120. Budescu, David and Thomas Wallsten 1995: ‘Processing Linguistic Probabilities: General Principles and Empirical Evidence’, in J. Busmeyer, D. Meldin and R. Hastie (edd.) Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective (San Diego: Academic Press), pp. 275–318. Byatt, A.S. 1989: Possession: a Romance (London: Chatto and Windus). Campbell, C.A., 1939: ‘The Psychology of Effort of Will’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40 pp. 49–74. Carver, Charles and Michael Scheier, 1998: On the Self-Regulation of Behavior (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Chang, Ruth (ed.) 1997: Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press). Charniak, Eugene 1991: ‘Bayesian Networks without Tears’, AI Magazine 12, pp. 50–63. —3— Chater, Nick, Joshua Tenenbaum and Alan Yuille 2006: ‘Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Conceptual Foundations’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, pp. 287–91. Chichester, Francis, 1964: The Lonely Sea and the Sky (London: Hodder and Stoughton). Christensen, David 1996: ‘Dutch Books Depragmatized: Epistemic Consistency for Partial Believers’, Journal of Philosophy 93, pp. 450–79. Collins, Anthony 1717: A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty Second Edition, ed. J. O’Higgins, (The Hague: Martinus Nijoff, 1976). Cook Wilson, John 1879: Aristotelian Studies I (Oxford: Clarendon Press). Cooper, Joel 2007: Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory (London: Sage). Cordner, Christopher 1985: ‘Jackson on Weakness of Will.’ Mind 94, pp. 273-80. Damasio, Antonio 1994: Descartes’ Error (New York: Putnam). Davidson, Donald 1963: ‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’ The Journal of Philosophy, 60, pp. 685-700. Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 3–20 — 1969: ‘How is Weakness of the Will Possible?’ in J. Feinberg (ed.) Moral Concepts (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 93–113. Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 21–42 —1978: ‘Intending’ in Y. Yovel (ed.) Philosophy of History and Action (Dordrecht: Reidel). Reprinted in Davidson 1980, pp. 83–102 —1980: Essays on Actions and Events (Oxford: Clarendon Press) DeHelian, Laura and Edward McClennen 1993: ‘Planning and the Stability of Intention: A Comment’, Minds and Machines 3, pp. 319–33. Dijksterhuis, Ap, Maarten Bos, Loran Nordgren, and Rick van Baaren 2006: ‘On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect’ Science, 311, pp. 1005–7. Donagan, Alan 1987: Choice: The Essential Element in Human Action (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul). Elster, Jon 1979: Ulysses and the Sirens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Fairbrother, W.A. 1897: ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Incontinence—A Contribution to Practical Ethics’ Mind 6, pp. 359–70. Fischer, John Martin 1994: The Metaphysics of Free Will (Oxford, Blackwell). —4— Flaubert, Gustave 1857: Madame Bovary, trans. Geoffrey Wall (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1992). Fodor, Jerry, 1983: Modularity of Mind (Cambridge MA: MIT Press). Frankish, Keith, Forthcoming: ‘Partial Belief and Flat-out Belief’, in F. Huber and C. Schmidt- Petri (edd.), Degrees of Belief, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) Gauthier, David 1994: ‘Assure and Threaten’ Ethics 104: 690–721. –– 1996: ‘Commitment and Choice: An Essay on the Rationality of Plans.’ In F. Frain, F. Hahn and S. Vannucci (edd.) Ethics, Rationality and Economic Behaviour, (Oxford: Clarendon Press) pp. 217–243. –– 1997: ‘Resolute Choice and Rational Deliberation: A Critique and a Defense’, Noûs 31, pp. 1– 25. Godden, Rumer 1975: The Peacock Spring (London: Macmillan). Gollwitzer, Peter 1993: ‘Goal achievement: The role of intentions’, in W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (edd.), European review of social psychology 4, pp. 141-185. — 1996: ‘The Volitional Benefits of Planning’ in Peter Gollwitzer and John Bargh (edd.), The Psychology of Action (New York: Guilford Press) pp. 287–312 — 1999: ‘Implementation Intentions: The Strong Effect of Simple Goals’ American Psychologist 54 (1999) pp. 493–503 — 2003: ‘Why we thought the action mindsets affect illusions of control’, Psychological Inquiry, 14, pp. 259-267. Gollwitzer, Peter and Ute Bayer, 1999: ‘Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action’ in S. Chaiken and Y. Trope (edd.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (New York: Guilford) pp. 403-422. Gollwitzer, Peter, Ute

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us