DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Seattle Area Soil Dioxin and PAH Concentrations Initial Summary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Seattle Area Soil Dioxin and PAH Concentrations Initial Summary Report Urban Seattle Area Soil Dioxin and PAH Concentrations Initial Summary Report September 2011 Publication no. 11-09-049 Template Publication and Contact Information This report is available on the Department of Ecology’s website at www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/1109049.html For more information contact: Toxics Cleanup Program P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Phone: Program Receptionist at 360-407-7170 Washington State Department of Ecology - www.ecy.wa.gov o Headquarters, Olympia 360-407-6000 o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 o Southwest Regional Office, Olympia 360-407-6300 o Central Regional Office, Yakima 509-575-2490 o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 If you need this document in a format for the visually impaired, call the Toxics Cleanup Program at 360-407-7170. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341. Urban Seattle Area Soil Dioxin and PAH Concentrations Initial Summary Report Prepared for Ecology by Hart Crowser Charles San Juan, LHG Toxics Cleanup Program – Ecology Project Manager Toxics Cleanup Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia, Washington Table of Contents Page List of Figures and Tables................................................................................................... ii Figures........................................................................................................................... ii Tables............................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................ iii Abstract/Executive Summary ............................................................................................ iv 1.0 Introduction....................................................................................................................1 2.0 Surface Soil Sampling Locations...................................................................................3 South Park .............................................................................................................3 Georgetown ...........................................................................................................3 West Seattle...........................................................................................................3 Capitol Hill ............................................................................................................3 Ballard ...................................................................................................................4 Ravenna .................................................................................................................4 3.0 Field Sampling Methods................................................................................................7 3.1 Subsample locations and collection methods ..........................................................7 3.2 Sample exclusion criteria.........................................................................................8 3.3 Deviations from the 2011 SAP ................................................................................9 4.0 Soil Chemical Analysis Results...................................................................................11 4.1 Data quality review summary ................................................................................11 4.2 Physical/chemical parameters................................................................................12 Total organic carbon............................................................................................12 Total solids ..........................................................................................................12 Grain size.............................................................................................................12 4.3 Dioxins/furans........................................................................................................12 4.4 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)............................................................13 5.0 References....................................................................................................................15 Appendices...........................................................................................................................1 Appendix A. Field Documentation...............................................................................1 Appendix B. Representative Photographs ....................................................................1 Appendix C. Chemical Data Quality Review and Laboratory Reports........................1 Chemical data quality review for soil samples......................................................1 Sample receiving exceedances ..............................................................................2 Physical/chemical parameters ...............................................................................3 PAHs by EPA 8270-SIM.......................................................................................4 Dioxins/furans by EPA 1613B ..............................................................................7 i List of Figures and Tables Page Figures Figure 1 Seattle Study Areas Figure 2 South Park Study Areas Figure 3 Georgetown Study Areas Figure 4 Ballard Study Areas Figure 5 West Seattle Study Areas Figure 6 Capitol Hill Study Areas Figure 7 Ravenna Study Areas Tables Table 1 Median and Average Carcinogenic PAH and Dioxin Toxicity Equivalent Concentrations Table 2 Sample Names and Neighborhood Locations Table 3 Analytical Results for Surface Soil Samples from South Park Study Areas Table 4 Analytical Results for Surface Soil Samples from Georgetown Study Areas Table 5 Analytical Results for Surface Soil Samples from Ballard Study Areas Table 6 Analytical Results for Surface Soil Samples from West Seattle Study Areas Table 7 Analytical Results for Surface Soil Samples from Capitol Hill Study Areas Table 8 Analytical Results for Surface Soil Samples from Ravenna Study Areas Table 9 Summary of Carcinogenic PAH Toxicity Equivalent Concentrations Table 10 Summary of Dioxin Total Toxicity Equivalent Concentrations ii Acknowledgements The authors of this report would like to thank the following people for their contribution to this study: • Hart Crowser (Roger McGinnis, Colleen Rust, and Anne Conrad) • City of Seattle (Lynn Best and Beth Schmoyer) • Integral Consulting (Betsy Day and Dreas Nielsen) • Greg Glass Consulting • Ecology - Dave Bradley (Toxicologist), Ian Mooser (GIS Technical Support), Meg Bommarito and Seth Preston (Public Involvement); Bob Warren iii Abstract/Executive Summary This report documents the results of Ecology’s investigation of surface soils collected from six Seattle neighborhoods, South Park, Georgetown, West Seattle, Ballard, Capitol Hill, and Ravenna (Figure 1). This investigation is in support of the Washington State Department of Ecology’s (Ecology) Toxics Cleanup Program (TCP). The purpose of this investigation was to collect sufficient data from various Seattle neighborhoods to determine the range and magnitude of concentrations and toxic equivalents (TEQs) of dioxins and furans in urban areas. Soil samples were also analyzed for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) TEQ data for surface soil. Twenty shallow soil samples (0 to 3 inches deep) were collected from each neighborhood for a total of 120 samples. To ensure samples were distributed throughout each neighborhood, each neighborhood was divided into quadrants (ten subsections in South Park only) containing an approximately equal number of properties per quadrant. The number of properties per quadrant differed in each neighborhood because the neighborhoods differ in size. An equal number of samples were collected from randomly selected locations within each quadrant. Each sample was a composite of five individual samples collected from City of Seattle right-of-way (ROW) land in front of a single property. The cPAH TEQ concentrations ranged from 1.9 to 8,900 ug/kg with an average concentration of 260 ug/kg. The median and nonparametric 90th percentile concentrations were 84 and 390 ug/kg, respectively. Dioxin TEQ concentrations ranged from 1.7 to 110 ng/kg with an average concentration of 19 ng/kg. The median and nonparametric 90th percentile concentrations were 12 and 46 ng/kg, respectively. In general, the lowest cPAH and dioxin TEQ concentrations were in samples collected from West Seattle and the highest median concentrations for dioxin were in samples from the Georgetown area, while the highest median concentrations for cPAH TEQ were in samples from Ballard (See Table 1). The project schedule did not allow for detailed statistical evaluations. However, preliminary evaluations indicate that soil concentrations in Ravenna, South Park, Ballard and Capitol Hill were not significantly different. iv URBAN SEATTLE AREA SOIL DIOXIN AND PAH CONCENTRATIONS INITIAL SUMMARY REPORT 1.0 Introduction This report documents the results of our investigation of surface soils collected from six Seattle neighborhoods, South Park, Georgetown, West Seattle, Ballard, Capitol Hill, and Ravenna (Figure 1). This investigation is in support of the Washington State Department of Ecology’s (Ecology) Toxics Cleanup Program (TCP). The purpose of this investigation was to collect sufficient data
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREAS: at Work in Seattle | 2012
    BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AtARE Work in SeattleAS A guide to the legislation and strategies for its use SEATTLE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT’S ONLY IN SEATTLE INITIATIVE This publication is an outgrowth of the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Assistance Program. Part of the Seattle Office of Economic Development’s Only in Seattle Initiative, the BIA Assistance Program provides training and technical assistance to business districts throughout the city in forming, managing, and updating Business Improvement Areas. For more information about Only in Seattle or the BIA Assistance Program, contact the Office of Economic Development at [email protected] or 206.684.8090 or www.seattle.gov/economicdevelopment. Spring 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY What are BIAs? BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREAS (BIAs) are funding mechanisms for business district revitalization and management. Specifically, the mechanism is an assessment collected from businesses and/or properties within defined boundaries. The funds collected are used to provide services for the mutual benefit of the businesses and properties being assessed. The concept of business district management funded through mandatory assessments has been around for many years, and gained wide popularity during the 1990s. Under one name or another, well over 1,000 such districts exist throughout the United States, with many more in Canada and throughout the world. BIAs include programs and services such as marketing, public area maintenance, security, parking, streetscape improvements, and professional management. Each BIA has a ratepayers advisory board made up of ratepayers within the BIA boundary. Creating a BIA In Seattle, BIAs are enacted by the City Council, using the authority of state law (RCW 35.87A) and the city charter.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sale: $1535000
    FOR SALE: $1,535,000 ALKI AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 2309 53RD AVE SW, SEATTLE, WA 98116 // ALKI BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD DOWNTOWN SEATTLE BALLARD MAGNOLIA QUEEN ANNE SUBJECT PROPERTY Scott Clements David Butler 1218 Third Avenue www.orioncp.com P// 206.445.7664 P// 206.445.7665 Suite 2200 P// 206.734.4100 [email protected] [email protected] Seattle, WA 98101 Established in 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS // INVESTMENT SUMMARY PAGE// 3 // SITE OVERVIEW PAGE// 4 // PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW PAGE// 13 // MARKET OVERVIEW PAGE// 16 // DEMOGRAPHICS PAGE// 17 2 // 2309 53RD AVE SW THE OFFERING Orion Commercial Partners is excited to offer for sale the Bungalow’s located at 2309 53rd Ave SW, Seattle WA. This rare redevelopment opportunity is located right on Alki Ave SW and has a preliminary site plan for 5 new townhomes ranging from 1,550 Square feet to 1,700 square feet. This site has unobstructed views of Puget Sound, the Olympic Mountains, Elliott Bay, Seattle and most importantly is right across the street from Alki Beach. Zoned LR2 (M), this 6,817 Square Foot lot can also be purchased as part of a 6 property portfolio of neighboring properties (details in Portfolio section). Priced at just over $225/square foot this opportunity will not last long! INVESTMENT 2309 53RD AVE SW, Address SEATTLE, WA 98116 SUMMARY Offering Price $1,535,000 Proposed # of 5 Townhome Units Price/Unit $307,000 SF Range of New 1,500 SF - 1,700 SF Townhome Units Price/SF Building $381.00 Total Land Area 6,817 SF Price Per Square $225.17 Foot Land Zoning LR2 (M) Year Built 1951 Portfolio Price 21,081,000 3 // 2309 53RD AVE SW SITE 53RD AVE SW OVERVIEW 2309 53RD AVE SW ALKI AVE SW // 10,170 VPD LR2 (M) ZONING Areas characterized by multifamily housing types in existing small-scale multifamily housing types, which are similar in character to single family zones.
    [Show full text]
  • West Seattle and Ballard
    West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions Link Extensions 2035 NW Market St Ballard Good things are Salmon Bay Crossing coming your way (MOVABLE BRIDGE) The West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions will provide Equity and inclusion W Dravus St Get involved fast, reliable light rail connections to dense residential Interbay and job centers throughout the region. In addition, a new 15th Ave W Alternatives development is an important time to engage. It’s during Sound Transit is committed to inclusively downtown Seattle light rail tunnel will provide capacity this phase that route, station locations, the preferred alternative and engaging communities along the project Ballard to for the entire regional system to operate efficiently. other alternatives to study during the environmental review process corridors, including those in historically downtown Seattle underrepresented communities. We recognize Both extensions are part of the regional light rail system will be identified. Lake this project will bring both benefits and expansion approved by voters in November 2016. Union Elliott Ave W In response to the public’s request to build these projects quickly, impacts to many who live and work in the area. The map on the right is our starting point, called the Smith Cove we’ve established an aggressive planning and environmental analysis During environmental review, we will work to representative project — let us know what YOU think! Seattle Center South timeline that relies on early and lasting community consensus on a identify and analyze such benefits and impacts West Seattle to downtown: Lake Union preferred alternative. with the goal of reaching out, translating Denny Way Denny and delivering projects that best serve the Adds 4.7 miles of light rail service from Link light rail There are many ways to get involved with this project — we hope to hear needs of all.
    [Show full text]
  • Context Statement
    CONTEXT STATEMENT THE CENTRAL WATERFRONT PREPARED FOR: THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS, CITY OF SEATTLE November 2006 THOMAS STREET HISTORY SERVICES 705 EAST THOMAS STREET, #204 SEATTLE, WA 98102 2 Central Waterfront and Environs - Historic Survey & Inventory - Context Statement - November 2006 –Update 1/2/07 THE CENTRAL WATERFRONT CONTEXT STATEMENT for THE 2006 SURVEY AND INVENTORY Central Waterfront Neighborhood Boundaries and Definitions For this study, the Central Waterfront neighborhood covers the waterfront from Battery Street to Columbia Street, and in the east-west direction, from the waterfront to the west side of First Avenue. In addition, it covers a northern area from Battery Street to Broad Street, and in the east- west direction, from Elliott Bay to the west side of Elliott Avenue. In contrast, in many studies, the Central Waterfront refers only to the actual waterfront, usually from around Clay Street to roughly Pier 48 and only extends to the east side of Alaskan Way. This study therefore includes the western edge of Belltown and the corresponding western edge of Downtown. Since it is already an historic district, the Pike Place Market Historic District was not specifically surveyed. Although Alaskan Way and the present shoreline were only built up beginning in the 1890s, the waterfront’s earliest inhabitants, the Native Americans, have long been familiar with this area, the original shoreline and its vicinity. Native Peoples There had been Duwamish encampments along or near Elliott Bay, long before the arrival of the Pioneers in the early 1850s. In fact, the name “Duwamish” is derived from that people’s original name for themselves, “duwAHBSH,” which means “inside people,” and referred to the protected location of their settlements inside the waters of Elliott Bay.1 The cultural traditions of the Duwamish and other coastal Salish tribes were based on reverence for the natural elements and on the change of seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Villages 1.9
    Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan | Toward a Sustainable Seattle 1.1 Urban Village Element urban village element Table of Contents Introduction 1.3 A Urban Village Strategy 1.3 A-1 Categories of Urban Villages 1.9 A-2 Areas Outside of Centers & Villages 1.21 B Distribution of Growth 1.22 C Open Space Network 1.25 D Annexation 1.27 January | 2005 Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan | Toward a Sustainable Seattle 1.3 Urban Village Element Introduction discussion Together, these tools form the urban village strategy. As Seattle’s population and job base grow, urban Seattle is prepared to embrace its share of the Puget villages are the areas where conditions can best sup- Sound region’s growth. To ensure that it remains a port increased density needed to house and employ urban village element vibrant and healthy place to live, Seattle has planned the city’s newest residents. By concentrating growth for the future of the city as a whole and for each ur- in these urban villages, Seattle can build on suc- ban center and urban village that is expected to grow cessful aspects of the city’s existing urban character, and change. The City will use these plans to shape continuing the development of concentrated, pedes- changes in ways that encompass the collective vision trian-friendly mixed-use neighborhoods of varied in- for the city as identified in this Plan. tensities at appropriate locations throughout the city. This Plan envisions a city where growth: helps to build stronger communities, heightens our steward- A Urban Village Strategy ship of the environment, leads to enhanced economic opportunity and security for all residents, and is accompanied by greater social equity across Seattle’s discussion communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Housing Choice Voucher Program
    Housing Choice Voucher Program Seattle Neighborhood Guide 190 Queen Anne Ave N Seattle, WA 98109 206.239.1728 1.800.833.6388 (TDD) www.seattlehousing.org Table of Contents Introduction Introduction ..……………………………………………………. 1 Seattle is made up of many neighborhoods that offer a variety Icon Key & Walk, Bike and Transit Score Key .……. 1 of features and characteristics. The Housing Choice Voucher Crime Rating ……………………………………………………… 1 Program’s goal is to offer you and your family the choice to Seattle Map ………………………………………………………. 2 move into a neighborhood that will provide opportunities for Broadview/Bitter Lake/Northgate/Lake City …….. 3 stability and self-sufficiency. This voucher can open the door Ballard/Greenwood ………………………………………….. 5 for you to move into a neighborhood that you may not have Fremont/Wallingford/Green Lake …………………….. 6 been able to afford before. Ravenna/University District ………………………………. 7 Magnolia/Interbay/Queen Anne ………………………. 9 The Seattle Neighborhood Guide provides information and South Lake Union/Eastlake/Montlake …………….… 10 guidance to families that are interested in moving to a Capitol Hill/First Hill ………………………………………….. 11 neighborhood that may offer a broader selection of schools Central District/Yesler Terrace/Int’l District ………. 12 and more opportunities for employment. Within the Madison Valley/Madrona/Leschi ……………………... 13 Neighborhood Guide, you will find information about schools, Belltown/Downtown/Pioneer Square ………………. 14 parks, libraries, transportation and community services. Mount Baker/Columbia City/Seward Park ………… 15 While the guide provides great information, it is not Industrial District/Georgetown/Beacon Hill ……… 16 exhaustive. Learn more about your potential neighborhood Rainier Beach/Rainier Valley …………………………….. 17 by visiting the area and researching online. Delridge/South Park/West Seattle .…………………… 19 Community Resources ……………….…………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Aquarium Ocean Pavilion Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for City of Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation and Seattle Aquarium Society
    November 2018 Seattle Aquarium Ocean Pavilion Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for City of Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation and Seattle Aquarium Society Final Environmental Impact Statement 1 November 2018 November 2018 Seattle Aquarium Ocean Pavilion Final Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for Prepared by City of Seattle Anchor QEA, LLC Department of Parks and Recreation 720 Olive Way, Suite 1900 100 Dexter Avenue North Seattle, Washington 98101 Seattle, Washington 98109 Heffron Transportation, Inc. Seattle Aquarium Society 6544 NE 61st St 1483 Alaskan Way Seattle, Washington 98115 Seattle, Washington 98101 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This document has been tagged to meet universal accessibility standards, consistent with Section 508 Standards of the Rehabilitation Act for Information Communication and Technology and Washington State accessibility policies. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make requests for alternative formats through the Washington Relay Service at 7-1-1. Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VI Statement to the Public The City of Seattle hereby gives public notice that it is the policy of the department to assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. Title VI requires that no person in the United States of America shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, nation origin, disability, or age, be excluded from the participation in, be denied benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the department receives federal financial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow-Landslide Hazard Map of Seattle, Washington
    Shallow-Landslide Hazard Map of Seattle, Washington By Edwin L. Harp1, John A. Michael1, and William T. Laprade2 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Golden, Colorado 80401 2 Shannon and Wilson, Inc., Seattle, Washington 98103 U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1139 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Harp, Edwin L., Michael, John A., and Laprade, William T., 2006, Shallow-Landslide Hazard Map of Seattle, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open- File Report 2006–1139, 18 p., 2 plates, map scale 1:25,000. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Cover photograph: Slopes along Puget Sound north of Carkeek Park where numerous debris flows have traveled downslope and across the tracks of the Burlington-Northern-Santa Fe Railroad. ii Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • AE 0036-17 System Expansion Committee 20210114
    Capital Cost Estimate Update for Projects in Development System Expansion Committee 01/14/2021 Why we’re here Provide more detail on the following capital cost estimates for ST3 projects currently in the project development phase: • West Seattle & Ballard Link Extensions • Tacoma Dome Link Extension Discuss next steps Discussion only, informing future Board actions. 2 Current construction not affected • This latest review applies only to cost estimates for projects not yet baselined. • 7 of 8 projects currently under construction are below budget and on schedule. • By 2024 we remain on track to nearly triple the region's light rail system from 22 to 62 miles. • Similar cost pressures increased baseline budgets for the Lynnwood and Federal Way extensions prior to beginning construction. 3 ST3 Plan cost estimates Previous methodology reviews State-appointed Expert Review Panel, September 26, 2016: "The level of allowances, contingencies and reserves at this very early stage of planning and design is appropriate. Further, the capital cost estimating methodology is sound and consistent with good industry practice.” “It is important to recognize that at this stage of project planning (and when the projects go to the ballot) the necessary environmental work has not begun for most of the projects... This makes cost estimating with any precision difficult.” 4 Process of refining estimates ST3 Plan estimates were conceptual in nature and based on very limited design. The plan identified risks for cost to grow beyond initial estimates. "Cost risk: The projects in Sound Transit 3 are based on conceptual engineering estimates. The risks for costs to grow beyond initial estimates include: faster than anticipated growth in construction costs; faster than anticipated growth in real estate values; the addition of new required elements or projects not currently included in the plan and more expensive project elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Stopover: President Xi Jinping’S First Trip to the United States As the President of the People’S Republic of China Began with a Stop in Seattle
    Seattle Stopover: President Xi Jinping’s first trip to the United States as the president of the People’s Republic of China began with a stop in Seattle. During President Xi Jinping’s two-day stay in the Emerald City in September 2015, he and other Chinese government officials met with Washington state leaders, including Governor Jay Inslee and senators Marie Cantwell and Patty Murray, as well as business leaders, like Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos and Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. “I am no stranger to the state of Washington and the city of Seattle. Known as the Evergreen State, and the Emerald City, here you have got the majestic Mount Rainier and the charming Lake Washington. The film Sleepless in Seattle has made the city almost a household name in China. Besides, Washington is the leading state in U.S. exports to China and China is the No. 1 trading partner of the Port of Seattle. Washington and Seattle have become an important symbol of the friendship between Chinese and American people and the win-win cooperation between the two countries.” President Xi Jinping, People’s Republic of China September 21, 2015 Welcome Banquet The Westin Seattle Seattle, Washington The Year of the Millennial: For young professionals, the Seattle area is the place to be. By Nelson Yong The Seattle area is a fantastic place for millennial professionals to live, work and play. In my experience having lived in West Los Angeles, Orange County and Hong Kong, the city offers a unique blend of a burgeoning metropolis with new construction seemingly on every corner, a slower-paced town with boutique shops and early curfews, and a diverse set of enclaves that bring with them an equally diverse mix of cuisines and cultures.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Waterfront Art Plan
    A WORKING PLAN FOR ART ON THE CENTRAL SEATTLE WATERFRONT 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4-7 I. Introduction 8-9 II. Vision 10 1. Ecology, Economy, Community 10 2. A Working Waterfront 11 3 The Waterfront as Cultural Think Tank 12 4. Site as Source 16-17 III. The Geography of the Waterfront 18 1. 360–Degree City 20 2. A Constellation of Sites 22 3. Navigation and Wayfinding 24 4. Mapping 38 IV. A Waterfront Program for Today and Tomorrow 39 1. A Framework for Administering the Cultural Vision for the Waterfront 40 2. Core Commissions 56 3. Ongoing Cultural Programming 57 - Temporary projects 58 - Talks 59 - Residency 60 - Archive and publication 62-63 V. Going Forward 64 1. City Agencies 65 2. A Future Waterfront Arts Organization and Nonprofit Cultural Partners 66 3. Other Partners 70-73 VI. Next Steps: Timeline This document is book 4 of 5 books of the Phase 1B Concept Design and Framework plan for Seattle’s Central Waterfront August 2012. Prepared for: Central Waterfront Committee, The Seattle Department of Transportation, Department of Planning and Development, and Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared by: Creative Time, Mark Dion, Eric Fredericksen, Tomato James Corner Field Operations CH2MHill, Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. SHoP Architects, Mithun, Berger Partnership, Nelson/ Nygaard, Parsons Brinkerhoff, Parametrix, EnviroIssues 3 INTRODUCTION I 4 INTRODUCTION This master plan lays out a multi-pronged approach for art on the Central Seattle Waterfront. The plan considers the history of the site as a working waterfront, the physical conditions of its location along the shores of Elliott Bay, and its role as part of Seattle’s evolving urban and cultural landscape.
    [Show full text]