DOCSLIB.ORG

Seattle Waterfront Art Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seattle Waterfront Art Plan A WORKING PLAN FOR ART ON THE CENTRAL SEATTLE WATERFRONT 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4-7 I. Introduction 8-9 II. Vision 10 1. Ecology, Economy, Community 10 2. A Working Waterfront 11 3 The Waterfront as Cultural Think Tank 12 4. Site as Source 16-17 III. The Geography of the Waterfront 18 1. 360–Degree City 20 2. A Constellation of Sites 22 3. Navigation and Wayfinding 24 4. Mapping 38 IV. A Waterfront Program for Today and Tomorrow 39 1. A Framework for Administering the Cultural Vision for the Waterfront 40 2. Core Commissions 56 3. Ongoing Cultural Programming 57 - Temporary projects 58 - Talks 59 - Residency 60 - Archive and publication 62-63 V. Going Forward 64 1. City Agencies 65 2. A Future Waterfront Arts Organization and Nonprofit Cultural Partners 66 3. Other Partners 70-73 VI. Next Steps: Timeline This document is book 4 of 5 books of the Phase 1B Concept Design and Framework plan for Seattle’s Central Waterfront August 2012. Prepared for: Central Waterfront Committee, The Seattle Department of Transportation, Department of Planning and Development, and Department of Parks and Recreation Prepared by: Creative Time, Mark Dion, Eric Fredericksen, Tomato James Corner Field Operations CH2MHill, Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. SHoP Architects, Mithun, Berger Partnership, Nelson/ Nygaard, Parsons Brinkerhoff, Parametrix, EnviroIssues 3 INTRODUCTION I 4 INTRODUCTION This master plan lays out a multi-pronged approach for art on the Central Seattle Waterfront. The plan considers the history of the site as a working waterfront, the physical conditions of its location along the shores of Elliott Bay, and its role as part of Seattle’s evolving urban and cultural landscape. First and foremost, this plan anchors the waterfront art program in the overall Framework Plan for Waterfront Seattle. Based on a detailed site analysis of the Central Waterfront, the Framework Plan outlines a vision that allows design and art to work together to reveal and develop the unique character and identity of this site. While the Design drafts strategies for reconnecting downtown Seattle to Elliott Bay physically, the Art Plan develops a program that will engage artists and the public in reconnecting Seattle to Elliott Bay culturally. The design and construction of the Central Waterfront will span decades, beginning with the Elliott Bay Seawall Replacement project in late 2013. The seawall will be built in phases and on a seasonal schedule over a period of three years. The viaduct demolition and Battery Street Tunnel decommissioning will follow the seawall construction, and those projects will in turn be followed by the construction of Alaskan Way and Elliott Avenue. Finally, the waterfront promenade and the various projects outlined in the Framework Plan and Concept Design reports will be built. Construction of the waterfront promenade is scheduled for completion around 2019. The construction schedule for the other projects remains undetermined. Due to the extended timeframe, it is important for the Art Plan to prepare for the coming years of phased construction on the Central Seattle Waterfront, similar to a play staged in several acts, with different sets, backdrops, and conditions. Anticipating the inevitable changes that will occur locally and globally over the next ten years, this Art Plan aims to be flexible and responsive, articulating an overall vision and program for presenting art on the waterfront over time. Although the site will change and develop year-to-year, this plan makes it possible for art to be physically and conceptually integrated into the design of each phase. The art program must evolve hand in hand with the design. The Concept Design for the waterfront outlines continuous elements that extend the length of the waterfront, ranging from the continuous waterfront promenade to the running thematic element of tidelines. The Design also identifies places along the waterfront that link it directly to adjacent and distinct neighborhoods via east-west connections. Art should address the large scale of the waterfront’s continuous elements and contribute to the understanding of narrative along the waterfront. It should draw connections between the waterfront and its adjacent neighborhoods through landmark works, projects, and events that connect a constellation of sites, and through active engagement with the public. From the physical infrastructure of the site to the ephemeral realities of the Bay itself, the Art Plan both responds to and helps define the future of the waterfront through early commissions that are part of the design process, and long-term programmatic opportunities to be executed long after design work is complete. 5 INTRODUCTION/ CONTINUED In addition to anchoring art in the geography and design of the waterfront, this plan acts as an advocate for artists of all backgrounds to be directly involved in the evolution of the waterfront. There is no site in Seattle more connected to a history of making, exchanging, and exploring than this. This plan seeks to identify existing opportunities for artist engagement, and to propose new and future possibilities for both artists and audiences. These opportunities are diverse and geographically wide-reaching, inviting artists to research and reflect on the site and ultimately facilitating the continuous involvement of artists on the waterfront over time. An articulated curatorial vision and process is key to ensuring the involvement of artists from the outset and throughout the extended period of design. This vision should run through each commission, project, and event on the site in order to establish a clear identity for the cultural program. This framework will create a legacy of artistic exchange and artist advocacy, placing art and ideas at the very core of the waterfront’s identity. The curatorial model for the waterfront will be flexible and always of its time, starting modestly and evolving in concert with the site and its resources to provide the maximum number of opportunities for the presentation and production of groundbreaking art. Lastly, this plan outlines specific projects and programs that can begin shortly after it is adopted and well before any construction has begun. These range from large-scale Core Commissions, tied directly to the infrastructure of the waterfront design, to ongoing cultural programming that addresses the conditions of the waterfront and further develops the dialog around art and artistic production as part of the waterfront’s future. These projects will be administered by city agencies, institutional partnerships, and eventually through an independent programming body on the waterfront. The key to the success of these projects is the support of not just one body, but many—the city, cultural organizations and institutions, neighborhood groups, artists, and the public at large. No successful program of this magnitude is built on one pillar. For this program and its individual parts to succeed, the Working Plan for Art on the Central Seattle Waterfront must be embraced by the people of Seattle and the artists and audiences that will work collaboratively to articulate its many experiences. Therefore, the final timeline outlines a plan of action for integrating the population of the city into the implementation of the Art Plan from the outset. In this way, we aim to make this an art program that is not simply a reflection of the waterfront, but the key element that defines its character. 6 + + to Seattle Center + + + Broad St + + + + Post Alley University St University S Main St 7 VISION II 8 VISION The Central Seattle Waterfront has long been a site of industry, exploration, and exchange. It is the place where Seattle began, and now the waterfront is poised to again be at the center of city life. As part of the larger Elliott Bay waterfront, it is a connector that links old and new, natural and manmade, and the physical with the poetic. A site of great economic, geological, ecological, and cultural complexity, the waterfront can serve as a rich resource and site for art and cultural expression. The incorporation of art will in turn encourage activity, production, and engagement, contributing to the development of new narratives about and encounters with the waterfront. As the design of the new waterfront is realized, art and culture will add layers of complexity, stimulation, and argumentation. The art team has worked closely with the design team from the outset, and through this relationship an “art intelligence” is integrated into each aspect of the design. Together, the teams’ shared goal is to ensure that art is physically integrated into the waterfront as it is redeveloped and that artists are provided with the space and infrastructure they need to produce their work. Public projects will negotiate connections between new and old on the site. Some will become landmarks, contributing to the identity, texture, and image of regions within the plan and suggesting links between these regions. Other projects will be dedicated to engaging the public in the development of a new cultural identity on the waterfront through artistic expression. The art team is committed to the idea that art does not merely respond to place, but is essential in producing a sense of place. The central goal of the design team is to reconnect the city with its waterfront. To this end, the Bay Ring has been proposed as a new center of the city and region. The Art Plan will extend these links beyond the shoreline limit and beyond the physical, creating new cultural connections between the city and the rest of the world. Waterfront Seattle is proposed not as a singular place, but instead as a series of neighborhoods that draw from and connect to the existing upland communities—those areas that are currently separated from the shoreline by the Alaskan Way Viaduct. The Art Plan considers Waterfront Seattle not strictly a design project or redevelopment, but as a process by which the city will be transformed over time, bringing together the site’s history, its present condition, and its future identity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALASKAN WAY VIADUCT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement
    ALASKAN WAY VIADUCT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX R Energy Discipline Report Submitted by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF J U L Y 2 0 1 1 Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project Final EIS Energy Discipline Report The Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project is a joint effort between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and the City of Seattle. To conduct this project, WSDOT contracted with: Parsons Brinckerhoff 999 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98104 In association with: Coughlin Porter Lundeen, Inc. EnviroIssues, Inc. GHD, Inc. HDR Engineering, Inc. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Magnusson Klemencic Associates, Inc. Mimi Sheridan, AICP Parametrix, Inc. Power Engineers, Inc. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. William P. Ott Construction Consultants SR 99: Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project July 2011 Energy Discipline Report Final EIS This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary .................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Summary of Analysis .................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 Methodology
    [Show full text]
  • BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREAS: at Work in Seattle | 2012
    BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AtARE Work in SeattleAS A guide to the legislation and strategies for its use SEATTLE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT’S ONLY IN SEATTLE INITIATIVE This publication is an outgrowth of the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Assistance Program. Part of the Seattle Office of Economic Development’s Only in Seattle Initiative, the BIA Assistance Program provides training and technical assistance to business districts throughout the city in forming, managing, and updating Business Improvement Areas. For more information about Only in Seattle or the BIA Assistance Program, contact the Office of Economic Development at [email protected] or 206.684.8090 or www.seattle.gov/economicdevelopment. Spring 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY What are BIAs? BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREAS (BIAs) are funding mechanisms for business district revitalization and management. Specifically, the mechanism is an assessment collected from businesses and/or properties within defined boundaries. The funds collected are used to provide services for the mutual benefit of the businesses and properties being assessed. The concept of business district management funded through mandatory assessments has been around for many years, and gained wide popularity during the 1990s. Under one name or another, well over 1,000 such districts exist throughout the United States, with many more in Canada and throughout the world. BIAs include programs and services such as marketing, public area maintenance, security, parking, streetscape improvements, and professional management. Each BIA has a ratepayers advisory board made up of ratepayers within the BIA boundary. Creating a BIA In Seattle, BIAs are enacted by the City Council, using the authority of state law (RCW 35.87A) and the city charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to Be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents
    DOWNTOWN ACCESS STRATEGY PHASE 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 II. Review of Existing Plans, Projects, and Programs ......................................... 2 III. Potential Construction Concerns and Opportunities .................................. 3 A. Existing Construction Planning Tools 3 B. SDOT’s Construction Hub Coordination Program 4 C. Construction Mitigation Strategies Used by Other Cities 7 D. Potential Construction Conflicts and Opportunities 10 IV. Future Transportation Network Opportunities ......................................... 12 A. North Downtown 12 B. Denny Triangle / Westlake Hub 14 C. Pioneer Square / Chinatown-ID 15 D. Downtown Core and Waterfront 16 V. Future Phases of Downtown Access Strategy ............................................. 18 A. Framework for Phase 2 (2014 through 2016) 18 B. Framework for Phase 3 (Beyond 2016) 19 - i - September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years I. INTRODUCTION Many important and long planned transportation and development projects are scheduled for con- struction in Downtown Seattle in the coming years. While these investments are essential to support economic development and job growth and to enhance Downtown’s stature as the region’s premier location to live, work, shop and play, in the short-term they present complicated challenges for con- venient and reliable access to and through Downtown. The Downtown Seattle Association (DSA) and its partners, Historic South Downtown (HSD) and the Seat- tle Department of Transportation (SDOT), seek to ensure that Downtown Seattle survives and prospers during the extraordinarily high level of construction activity that will occur in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions for Seattle Mayoral Candidates – Magnolia Chamber of Commerce
    Questions for Seattle Mayoral Candidates – Magnolia Chamber of Commerce The Magnolia Chamber of Commerce believes that an educated, engaged electorate is one of the key aspects of a thriving community. To assist our members, the local business community, and Magnolia residents better understand our Seattle mayoral candidates, we are asking each candidate to please fill out the questionnaire covering topics important to the Magnolia neighborhood AND/OR be interviewed one-on-one by our executive director, relying on the techniques we have developed for our Chamber Chat series (see Chamber Chat interview with Councilmember Andrew Lewis) Each mayoral candidate will be asked the exact same questions. We will post your video and/or your written answers on our website and make available to our members via a special election newsletter that will go out before the primary election date. About the Magnolia Chamber of Commerce. The Magnolia Chamber represents just over 370 Magnolia businesses and family members. Our mission is to add to the vibrancy of our community by fostering connections between Magnolia’s businesses, residents, and community groups. Our purpose is to promote civic and commercial progress in our business districts and neighborhood. Learn more about the Magnolia Chamber by visiting https://discovermagnolia.org/ For questions and/or to set up a video interview, please contact Jason Thibeaux, Executive Director, Magnolia Chamber of Commerce. Seattle Mayoral Candidate Questions (these questions can be answered either by video with our Executive Director, Jason Thibeaux at 206-618-1589 or [email protected] and/or filled out and sent to the Magnolia Chamber, 3213 West Wheeler Street, #42, Seattle, WA 98199 Good Governance, Effective Leadership 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Digging Deep Into the Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project
    “Digging Deeper into the Alaskan Way Viaduct OrganizationReplacement Program” DateTim Moore PE, SE WSDOT Mega Projects Bridge Manager June 12, 2017 Today’s FOCUS • Concrete Innovation • Holgate to King • South cut‐and‐cover • Bored tunnel • South Dearborn street off‐ramp • The path forward This is a SAFETY project The viaduct and neighboring seawall are vulnerable to earthquakes The viaduct in 1953 Geography vS. drivers Building a new SR 99 Corridor Today’s FOCUS • Why it matters • Holgate to King • South cut‐and‐cover • Bored tunnel • South Dearborn street off‐ramp • The path forward 12 PSG Spans 1900’ Length (200,000 sq ft) Stage 2: Holgate to King Building SOUTH ACCESS 4’-1” 6 ¼” ” WF74G to WF100G 8’-4 WF100G $250/sq ft Super GIRDERS Building SOUTH ACCESS $320/sq ft 65,000 sq ft Building SOUTH ACCESS R = 38’ R = 70’ Building SOUTH ACCESS Gateway to the SEATTLE TUNNEL Today’s FOCUS • Why it matters • Holgate to King • South cut‐and‐cover • Bored tunnel • South Dearborn street off‐ramp • The path forward Future SOUTH PORTAL South operations building Launch pit Cut and cover tunnel Building the SOUTH PORTAL South End Settlement Mitigation SESMP – 670 shafts South Cut & Cover – 1050 shafts King Main Jackson Washington Tunnel Alignment N Today’s FOCUS • Why it matters • Holgate to King • South cut‐and‐cover • Bored tunnel • South Dearborn street off‐ramp • The path forward 270’ max depth 150’ below WT Poor, unconsolidated soils Till deposits Cohesionless sand and gravel – regional aquifer Cohesionless silt and fine sand Cohesive clay and silt Till‐like deposits GEOLOGIC Profile This is available as an interactive map online at www.AlaskanWayViaduct.org and at Milepost 31.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sale: $1535000
    FOR SALE: $1,535,000 ALKI AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY 2309 53RD AVE SW, SEATTLE, WA 98116 // ALKI BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD DOWNTOWN SEATTLE BALLARD MAGNOLIA QUEEN ANNE SUBJECT PROPERTY Scott Clements David Butler 1218 Third Avenue www.orioncp.com P// 206.445.7664 P// 206.445.7665 Suite 2200 P// 206.734.4100 [email protected] [email protected] Seattle, WA 98101 Established in 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS // INVESTMENT SUMMARY PAGE// 3 // SITE OVERVIEW PAGE// 4 // PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW PAGE// 13 // MARKET OVERVIEW PAGE// 16 // DEMOGRAPHICS PAGE// 17 2 // 2309 53RD AVE SW THE OFFERING Orion Commercial Partners is excited to offer for sale the Bungalow’s located at 2309 53rd Ave SW, Seattle WA. This rare redevelopment opportunity is located right on Alki Ave SW and has a preliminary site plan for 5 new townhomes ranging from 1,550 Square feet to 1,700 square feet. This site has unobstructed views of Puget Sound, the Olympic Mountains, Elliott Bay, Seattle and most importantly is right across the street from Alki Beach. Zoned LR2 (M), this 6,817 Square Foot lot can also be purchased as part of a 6 property portfolio of neighboring properties (details in Portfolio section). Priced at just over $225/square foot this opportunity will not last long! INVESTMENT 2309 53RD AVE SW, Address SEATTLE, WA 98116 SUMMARY Offering Price $1,535,000 Proposed # of 5 Townhome Units Price/Unit $307,000 SF Range of New 1,500 SF - 1,700 SF Townhome Units Price/SF Building $381.00 Total Land Area 6,817 SF Price Per Square $225.17 Foot Land Zoning LR2 (M) Year Built 1951 Portfolio Price 21,081,000 3 // 2309 53RD AVE SW SITE 53RD AVE SW OVERVIEW 2309 53RD AVE SW ALKI AVE SW // 10,170 VPD LR2 (M) ZONING Areas characterized by multifamily housing types in existing small-scale multifamily housing types, which are similar in character to single family zones.
    [Show full text]
  • West Seattle and Ballard
    West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions Link Extensions 2035 NW Market St Ballard Good things are Salmon Bay Crossing coming your way (MOVABLE BRIDGE) The West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions will provide Equity and inclusion W Dravus St Get involved fast, reliable light rail connections to dense residential Interbay and job centers throughout the region. In addition, a new 15th Ave W Alternatives development is an important time to engage. It’s during Sound Transit is committed to inclusively downtown Seattle light rail tunnel will provide capacity this phase that route, station locations, the preferred alternative and engaging communities along the project Ballard to for the entire regional system to operate efficiently. other alternatives to study during the environmental review process corridors, including those in historically downtown Seattle underrepresented communities. We recognize Both extensions are part of the regional light rail system will be identified. Lake this project will bring both benefits and expansion approved by voters in November 2016. Union Elliott Ave W In response to the public’s request to build these projects quickly, impacts to many who live and work in the area. The map on the right is our starting point, called the Smith Cove we’ve established an aggressive planning and environmental analysis During environmental review, we will work to representative project — let us know what YOU think! Seattle Center South timeline that relies on early and lasting community consensus on a identify and analyze such benefits and impacts West Seattle to downtown: Lake Union preferred alternative. with the goal of reaching out, translating Denny Way Denny and delivering projects that best serve the Adds 4.7 miles of light rail service from Link light rail There are many ways to get involved with this project — we hope to hear needs of all.
    [Show full text]
  • Context Statement
    CONTEXT STATEMENT THE CENTRAL WATERFRONT PREPARED FOR: THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOODS, CITY OF SEATTLE November 2006 THOMAS STREET HISTORY SERVICES 705 EAST THOMAS STREET, #204 SEATTLE, WA 98102 2 Central Waterfront and Environs - Historic Survey & Inventory - Context Statement - November 2006 –Update 1/2/07 THE CENTRAL WATERFRONT CONTEXT STATEMENT for THE 2006 SURVEY AND INVENTORY Central Waterfront Neighborhood Boundaries and Definitions For this study, the Central Waterfront neighborhood covers the waterfront from Battery Street to Columbia Street, and in the east-west direction, from the waterfront to the west side of First Avenue. In addition, it covers a northern area from Battery Street to Broad Street, and in the east- west direction, from Elliott Bay to the west side of Elliott Avenue. In contrast, in many studies, the Central Waterfront refers only to the actual waterfront, usually from around Clay Street to roughly Pier 48 and only extends to the east side of Alaskan Way. This study therefore includes the western edge of Belltown and the corresponding western edge of Downtown. Since it is already an historic district, the Pike Place Market Historic District was not specifically surveyed. Although Alaskan Way and the present shoreline were only built up beginning in the 1890s, the waterfront’s earliest inhabitants, the Native Americans, have long been familiar with this area, the original shoreline and its vicinity. Native Peoples There had been Duwamish encampments along or near Elliott Bay, long before the arrival of the Pioneers in the early 1850s. In fact, the name “Duwamish” is derived from that people’s original name for themselves, “duwAHBSH,” which means “inside people,” and referred to the protected location of their settlements inside the waters of Elliott Bay.1 The cultural traditions of the Duwamish and other coastal Salish tribes were based on reverence for the natural elements and on the change of seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • As a Di‘Erent Route Through Downtown Buses Continuing INTERBAY Swedish S
    N 152 St to Shoreline CC Snohomish County– to Aurora toAuroraVill toMtlk to Richmond NE 150 St toWoodinvilleviaBothell 373 5 SHORELINE 355 Village Beach Downtown Seattle toNSt Terr to Shoreline CC toUWBothell 308 512 402 405 410 412 347 348 77 330 309 toHorizonView 312 413 415 416 417 421 NE 145 St 373 308 NE 145 St ­toKenmoreP&R N 145 St 304 316 Transit in Seattle 422 425 435 510 511 65 308 toUWBothell 513 Roosevelt Wy N Frequencies shown are for daytime period. See Service Guide N 143 St 28 Snohomish County– 346 512 301 303 73 522 for a complete summary of frequencies and days of operation. 5 64 University District 5 E 304 308 For service between 1:30–4:30 am see Night Owl map. 512 810 821 855 860 E N 871 880 y 3 Av NW 3 Av Jackson Park CEDAR W Frequent Service N 135 St Golf Course OLYMPIC y Linden Av N Linden Av PARK t Bitter i Every 15 minutes or better, until 7 pm, Monday to Friday. C HILLS weekdays Lake e 372 Most lines oer frequent service later into the night and on NW 132 St Ingraham k a Ashworth Av N Av Ashworth N Meridian Av NE 1 Av NE 15 Av NE 30 Av L weekends. Service is less frequent during other times. (express) 373 77 N 130 St Roosevelt Wy NE 372 weekends 28 345 41 Link Light Rail rapid transit North- every 10 minutes BITTER LAKE acres 8 Av NW 8 Av Park 5 NW 125 St N 125 St Haller NE 125 St E RapidRide limited stop bus for a faster ride 345 Lake NE 125 St every 10–12 minutes 346 PINEHURST 8 Frequent Bus every 10–12 minutes BROADVIEW 99 347 348 continues as LAKE CITY 75 Frequent Bus every 15 minutes 41 345 NE 120 St Northwest
    [Show full text]
  • Trusted Innovative Underground Solutions
    TRUSTED INNOVATIVE UNDERGROUND SOLUTIONS The HNTB Companies Infrastructure Solutions INNOVATIVE TUNNEL SOLUTIONS HNTB experts have the insight and knowledge to provide innovative solutions on a wide range of tunnels, including cut-and-cover, tunnel boring machine (TBM) tunnels, conventional tunneling, NATM, immersed tube tunnels, shaft construction and micro-tunneling. Our long history in planning, program management, design, construction management and technical services for tunnel structures includes award-winning projects on some of the country’s most complex tunneling projects. Recipient of numerous national and international awards including the International Tunneling Award, Advisor/ Program Manager of the year and the Tom Lantos Tunnels at Devil’s Slide UCA of SME Project of the Year Award. San Mateo County, California Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Istanbul Strait Road Tunnel Project Los Angeles Istanbul, Turkey HNTB is the principal engineer and The project was challenged by architect for Walsh/Shea Corridor the area’s varied geology and Constructors on an 8.5-mile, eight- propensity for earthquakes, high station, light rail design-build project water pressure below sea level that will connect the Los Angeles and the tunnel’s large-diameter/ County Metropolitan Transportation double-deck lane configuration. It Authority’s existing Green Line with the was recognized as the ITA Project Expo Line and integrate Los Angeles of the Year. International Airport into the regional rail network. Sound Transit University Link COMPREHENSIVE TUNNELING EXPERIENCE INCLUDES: (U-LINK) Extension Seattle • Soft ground tunnels • Ground/structure interaction • Rock tunnels • Seismic design and seismic retrofit of tunnels HNTB’s role included design of • Caverns • Geotechnical and structural instrumentation more than 3 miles of twin-bore • Shafts • Ground improvement tunnel and two underground stations.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 99 Deep Bored Tunnel Vs. the Waterfront Tunnel
    Alaskan Way Viaduct & Seawall Replacement Program Central Waterfront 02.09 All tunnels are not the same: SR 99 deep bored tunnel vs. the waterfront tunnel WSDOT, King County and the City of Seattle plan to replace the central waterfront portion of the Alaskan Way Viaduct and Seawall with an approximately 2 mile-long deep bored tunnel beneath downtown, a new waterfront surface street, transit investments, and downtown and waterfront city street improvements. While this bored tunnel and the cut-and-cover tunnel considered by Seattle voters in March 2007 are both tunnels, they are vastly different in their construction methods, length and degree of public disruption, and environmental effects. The bored tunnel will be two lanes in each direction with shoulders on each side. Location and depth Construction method The bored tunnel will be located several and timeline blocks inshore under First Avenue, The bored tunnel will be drilled by a large bypassing the Battery Street Tunnel. tunnel boring machine, and most of the The cut-and-cover tunnel would have construction operations will occur from roughly followed the path of the existing one location near the stadiums. The tunnel viaduct. boring machine will be a new machine built specifically for this tunnel. Constructing Other central waterfront The bored tunnel will be at depths of 100- the cut-and-cover tunnel would have fact sheets include: 200 feet, while the cut-and-cover tunnel meant digging up the entire street along would have required excavation of 30-50 Alaskan Way, temporarily rebuilding • Comparison of the Big Dig and feet of soil.
    [Show full text]
  • July–September 2019 December 2019
    Megaprograms Diversity and Inclusive Contracting Quarterly Report: July–September 2019 December 2019 Diversity brings rewards Megaprograms Diversity and Inclusive Contracting Diversity brings a wealth of talent and experience to our Megaprograms. In fact, two of our Diversity Managers were recently recognized for their efforts in this area by two local Quarterly Report: July–September 2019 organizations that support small business. Regina Glenn: A True Champion for Diversity and Inclusion Tabor 100 acknowledged Bobby Forch at its 20th Annual Gala For decades, Regina Glenn has been a part of the diversity and inclusion event for his work with WSDOT since 2014 managing some of community. She kicked her passion into high gear about 25 years ago when our largest diversity and inclusion projects. Tabor 100 is known for Regina, an out-of-towner from New York, was tasked by the City of Tacoma its commitment to economic power, educational excellence, and to undertake a formidable task: help boost diversity at the Tacoma Fire social equity for African-Americans and the community at large. Department. The job wasn’t easy, but Regina did what she does best—she “I am happy we were able to provide opportunities to help grow forged relationships, reached agreements and got results. And, after a few communities that much of the time do not see the benefit of these Regina Glenn and Bobby Forch both received years of exceeding all expectations with the Tacoma City Manager about large construction projects,” Forch said. awards for their diversity and inclusion advocacy. her work with the fire department, she began to build the foundation of her Diversity and Inclusion Manager for WSDOT’s Megaprograms, professional philosophy: connecting people though diversity and inclusion.
    [Show full text]