Wanjiku's Journey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wanjiku's Journey WANJIKU’S JOURNEY Tracing Kenya’s Quest for a New Constitution and Reporting on the 2010 National Referendum November 2010 2 Wanjiku’s Journey Table of Contents List of Abbrevia ons and Acronyms 5 Acknowledgment 7 Foreword by the Chair 8 Execu ve Summary 9 PART I: BACKGROUND TO CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM 11 1.1 Brief History of Struggle 11 1.2 Failure of the State 12 1.3 Imminent Collapse in 2008 14 PART II: ROAD TO THE 2010 REFERENDUM 16 2.1 Stages of Review and the Organs 16 2.2 KHRC’s Role in the Final Phase of Cons tu onal Review 17 2.3 KHRC’s REMAC 18 2.3.1 Goal of Monitoring 18 2.3.2 Objec ves of Monitoring 19 2.3.3 Thema c Scope and Focus 19 2.3.4 Targeted Human Rights Viola ons 20 PART III: MAJOR FINDINGS 21 3.1 Civic Educa on by the CoE 21 3.2 The Referendum Campaigns 22 3.2.1 Abuse of Offi ce and Bribery 23 3.2.2 Distor on of the Contents of the PCK 24 3.2.3 Use of Hate Speech and Unsavoury Language 27 3.3 In mida on, Threats and Violence 28 Wanjiku’s Journey 3 3.4 Poli cal Subversion 30 3.5 Conduct of the Referendum 30 PART IV: JOURNEY TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION 34 4.1 Eff ec ve Date 34 4.2 Organs for Implementa on 34 4.2.1 The CIOC 34 4.2.2 The CIC 35 4.2.3 Role of Parliament 36 4.2.4 The People of Kenya 36 PART V: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 37 4.1 On the Cons tu on of Kenya 37 4.2 On Leadership 37 4.3 On the People of Kenya 38 4.4 On Implementa on 38 4.5 On the 2012 General Elec ons 39 4.6 On Civic Educa on 40 ANNEXES AND REFERENCES 41 Annex 1: Cons tuencies that were monitored 41 Annex 2: The IIEC’s Offi cial Referendum Results 42 Annex 3: Envisaged Government Structure 48 BIBLIOGRAPHY 49 4 Wanjiku’s Journey List of Abbreviations and Acronyms 4Cs Ci zens’ Coali on for Cons tu onal Change AG A orney General CEC County Execu ve Commi ee CGD Centre for Governance and Development CIC Commission for the Implementa on of the Cons tu on CIOC Cons tu on Implementa on Oversight Commi ee CKRC Cons tu on of Kenya Review Commission CNC Coali on for Na onal Conven on CoE Commi ee of Experts COVAW Coali on on Violence against Women CRECO Cons tu on and Reform Educa on Consor um CSOs Civil Society Organisa ons DPK Democra c Party of Kenya ECK Electoral Commission of Kenya ELOG Elec on Observa on Group FIDA Federa on of Women Lawyers-Kenya FORD Forum for the Restora on of Democracy IDPs Internally Displaced Persons IEBC Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission IIBRC Interim Independent Boundaries Review Commission IIEC Interim Independent Electoral Commission IPPG Inter Par es Parliamentary Group KADU Kenya African Democra c Union KANU Kenya African Na onal Union KEC Kenya Episcopal Conference KHRC Kenya Human Rights Commission KNDR Kenya Na onal Dialogue and Reconcilia on KNCHR Kenya Na onal Commission on Human Rights KNHREC Kenya Na onal Human Rights and Equality Commission KPU Kenya Peoples’ Union LDP Liberal Democra c Party NA Na onal Assembly NAK Na onal Alliance of Kenya NARC Na onal Rainbow Coali on Wanjiku’s Journey 5 NARC-K Na onal Rainbow Coali on-Kenya NCA Na onal Conven on Assembly NCC Na onal Cons tu onal Conference NCCK Na onal Council of Churches of Kenya NCEC Na onal Conven on Execu ve Council NCEP Na onal Civic Educa on Programme NCIC Na onal Cohesion and Integra on Commission NDP Na onal Democra c Party NGOs Non-Governmental Organisa ons NLP Na onal Land Policy ODM Orange Democra c Movement ODM-K Orange Democra c Movement-Kenya PCK Proposed Cons tu on of Kenya PeCK People’s Commission of Kenya PEV Post-Elec ons Violence PNU Party of Na onal Unity PSC Parliamentary Select Commi ee REMAC Referendum Monitoring and Advocacy Centre RPP Release Poli cal Prisoners SDP Social Democra c Party TJRC Truth, Jus ce and Reconcilia on Commission 6 Wanjiku’s Journey Acknowledgment The KHRC wishes to acknowledge several Kenyans who made this publica on possible. First and fore- most, we wish to appreciate the reless eff orts of 59 monitors for sending various reports before, during and a er the referendum campaigns. Their energies in data collec on and sending mely reports were exemplary. While we cannot men on all monitors, we would like to single out four whom we rated as having the best reports throughout the monitoring exercise: Richard O eno Olang, Faith Karuri, Karu Nchebere and Susan Waturi Ndanyi. Further, we also wish to acknowledge the work of Viola Jobita and Pauline Wanja who were collec ng, colla ng and analysing data emerging from the above monitors and also other sources. The KHRC is for- ever indebted to the dexterity of their analyses. Further s ll, we wish to thank Davies Malombe for hav- ing coordinated and supervised the work of the Referendum Monitoring and Advocacy Centre (REMAC). Finally, this report was co-authored by James Mawira and Tom Kagwe, whom we hear ly acknowledge as well. We acknowledge Beryl Aidi for input in copy edi ng. Last but not least, we wish to appreciate the me culous editorial work done to this report by Muthoni Wanyeki, the Execu ve Director at KHRC. While we appreciate the 70 percent eligible Kenyan electorate who turned up on August 04, 2010 to exercise their democra c right to vote, it is our hope that this report will serve as a wake-up call to all Kenyans, those living and those yet to come in the next genera on, that the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. Wanjiku’s Journey in searching for a new Cons tu on is over; at least the fi rst part. The Prom- ulga on of the new Cons tu on, on August 27, 2010, marks the beginning of a new Journey: that of implemen ng, safeguarding and upholding the values and principles that the new Cons tu on of Kenya (2010) sets forth. God bless Kenya Wanjiku’s Journey 7 Foreword by the Chair Since its founding, the Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) has established itself as the premier human rights non-governmental organisa on (NGO) in Kenya, and perhaps in the region. The KHRC has been at the forefront of bringing new and novel methods of advocacy to the fi eld. As a norma ve ma er, the KHRC has pushed the fron er of norm-making in both tradi onal and non-tradi onal areas of advocacy. Vision 2012, the cornerstone of the KHRC’s current mandate is a clear tes mony to these contribu ons. That’s why this report, on the 2010 referendum on the Cons tu on, is a fi ng instalment in the work of the organisa on. First, some context. While it could be argued that the struggle for a democra c Cons tu on dates back to the an -colonial struggle and the eff orts to challenge the entrenchment of an imperial Presidency un- der the fi rst post-independent regime, the KHRC was among the earliest advocates for a new democra c Cons tu on for Kenya. Way back in 1994—even before the clamour for a new Cons tu on became a key fi xture in Kenya’s poli cal lexicon—the KHRC, together with the Interna onal Commission of Jurists (ICJ)-Kenya and the Law Society of Kenya (LSK), had produced a model Cons tu on for Kenya. Although the model Cons tu on was a project of these three organisa ons, the KHRC ini ated and led the pro- cess towards it. I am proud of the KHRC’s pioneering role in this respect. That document laid the groundwork for the debate that was to follow and culminate in a new Cons tu- on more than 15 years later. Its basic norma ve framework can be seen in the new Cons tu on. But, between 1994 and 2010, the KHRC ratcheted up its struggle for a new Cons tu on. The organisa on’s Board and staff members have been key players in the na onal debate every step of the way. It’s not, therefore, an exaggera on to claim the new Cons tu on as the KHRC’s baby. That’s why we, as an organisa on, took a special interest in the referendum and the way it was conducted. We assiduously monitored the ac vi es of all players throughout the long and contested process. We were concerned with the fairness and integrity of the process to make sure that the corrosive eff ects of bias, bigotry, and poli cs would not deprive Kenyans of their right to a free vote. This report is par cularly useful for the lessons it off ers because it is those lessons that will indicate how well the Cons tu on is implemented. But the report is also a human rights record of the most historic event in Kenya since independence in 1964. We off er the report to all as a fund of knowledge for what we saw—especially those aspects of the process that pointed to a democra c defi cit. We hope that it will serve as guide to democra c development.
Recommended publications
  • Senate Order Paper 8Th October 2015
    REPUBLIC OF KENYA ELEVENTH PARLIAMENT – (THIRD SESSION) THE SENATE ORDER PAPER THURSDAY, OCTOBER 08, 2015 AT 2.30 P.M PRAYERS 1. Administration of Oath 2. Communication from the Chair 3. Messages 4. Petitions 5. Papers (As Listed in the Appendix) 6. Notices of Motion (As Listed in the Appendix) 7. Statements (As Listed in the Appendix) 8. THE COUNTY STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS BILL (SENATE BILL NO. 10 OF 2015) (Chairperson, Standing Committee on Delegated Legislation) (First Reading) 9. THE MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES (AMENDMENT) BILL (SENATE BILL NO. 12 OF 2015 ) (Sen. Wamatangi Kimani Paul) (First Reading) 10. THE PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (AMENDMENT) BILL (SENATE BILL NO. 13 OF 2015) (Sen. Godliver Omondi) (First Reading) 11. MOTION - (The Chairperson of the Select Committee) THAT, this House adopts the Report of the Select Committee of the Senate on Constitutional and Legal Review laid on the Table of the House on Wednesday, 23rd September, 2015. 12. MOTION – (Sen. Fatuma Dullo) (Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government) WHEREAS Article 51 of the Constitution of Kenya protects the rights of detained persons, persons held in custody and other imprisoned persons under the law, and requires Parliament to enact legislation to provide for the humane treatment of such persons with due regard to the relevant international human rights instruments; OBSERVING that international instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the International
    [Show full text]
  • Education in 11Th and 12Th Parliaments: Assessing Kenya’S Parliamentary 10-Year Legacy on the Actualization of the Right to Education
    EDUCATION IN 11TH AND 12TH PARLIAMENTS: ASSESSING KENYA’S PARLIAMENTARY 10-YEAR LEGACY ON THE ACTUALIZATION OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION RESEARCH DONE BY MZALENDO TRUST FOR THE RELI EAST AFRICA PARTNERS WITH THE SUPPORT FROM THE REGIONAL LEARNING INITIATIVE (RELI AFRICA) Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 4 CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................. 6 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... 6 SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................. 6 PURPOSE OF STUDY ........................................................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................................ 7 SENATE LEGACY ON EDUCATION .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Newspaper Visibility of Members of Parliament in Kenya*
    Journalism and Mass Communication, ISSN 2160-6579 D July 2012, Vol. 2, No. 7, 717-734 DAVID PUBLISHING Newspaper Visibility of Members of Parliament in Kenya* Kioko Ireri Indiana University, Bloomington, USA This research investigates variables that predicted news coverage of 212 members of parliament (MPs) in Kenya by four national newspapers in 2009. The 10 variables examined are: ordinary MP, cabinet minister, powerful ministry, parliamentary committee chairmanship, seniority, big tribe identity, major party affiliation, presidential ambition, commenting on contentious issues, and criticizing government. Findings indicate that commenting on contentious issues, criticizing government, cabinet minister, ordinary MP, powerful ministry, and seniority significantly predicted visibility of the parliamentarians in newspaper news. However, a multiple regression analysis shows that the strongest predictors are commenting on contentious issues, cabinet minister, criticizing government, and big tribe identity. While commenting on controversial issues was the strongest predictor, major party identification and committee leadership were found not to predict MPs’ visibility. Keywords: Kenya, members of parliament (MPs), newspapers, newspaper visibility, politicians, visibility, visibility predictor Introduction Today, the mass media have become important platforms for the interaction of elected representatives and constituents. Through the mass media, citizens learn what their leaders are doing for them and the nation. Similarly, politicians use the media to make their agendas known to people. It is, thus, rare to come across elected leaders ignorant about the importance of registering their views, thoughts, or activities in the news media. In Kenya, members of parliament have not hesitated to exploit the power of the mass media to its fullest in their re-election bids and in other agendas beneficial to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Introduction
    Chapter One Introduction Imagine trying to cover Northern Ireland‟s troubles without using the words „Protestant‟ or „Catholic‟. Or reporting Iraq without referring to „Shias‟ and „Sunnis‟. The attempt would be absurd, the result unfathomable. And yet, in Kenya‟s post-electoral crisis, that is exactly what much of the local media doggedly tried to do. When we read an account in a British newspaper of shack-dwellers being evicted from a Nairobi slum, or see on the BBC gangs attacking inhabitants in the Rift Valley, we are usually told whether these are Kikuyus fleeing Luos, or Kalenjins attacking Kikuyus. But, in Kenya, this particular spade is almost never called a spade. No, it‟s "a certain metal implement". The "problem of tribalism" may be obsessively debated, the gibe of "tribalist" thrown with reckless abandon at politicians and community leaders, but it is just not done to identify a person‟s tribe in the media. The results, given a crisis in which the expression of long-running grievances has taken the most explicit ethnic form, can be opaque. When Mr Maina Kiai, chairman of the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, addressed displaced people in Eldoret earlier this year, he was booed and heckled. Kenyan media reported the incident without explaining why. The answer was that the displaced he met were mostly Kikuyus, and Kiai, a vocal Kikuyu critic of a Kikuyu-led Government, is regarded by many as a traitor to his tribe. Sometimes, the outcome is simply bizarre. When one newspaper ran a vox pop in January, one entry was meant to capture vividly the predicament of a 15-year-old girl of mixed parentage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate Motions Tracker As at 01.12.2016 1
    PARLIAMENT OF KENYA THE SENATE MOTIONS TRACKER – FOURTH SESSION, 2016 AFFECTS/ DATES NOTICE SECONDER DOES NOT DEBATED No SUBJECT OF PROPOSER DIVISION REMARKS AFFECT AND MOTION COUNTIES CONCLUDED THAT, pursuant to Standing Order 176(1), the Senate approves the following Senators to be Members of the Rules and Business Committee:- 1. Sen. David Ekwee Ethuro - Speaker of the Senate - Chairperson 2. Sen.(Prof.) Kithure Kindiki - Senate Majority Leader 3. Sen. Moses MasikaWetang’ula - Senate Minority Adopted without Leader Senate Senate Does not Tuesday, Tuesday, amendment 1. 4. Sen. Beatrice Elachi – Senate Majority Whip Majority Minority affect - 09.02.16 09.02.16 s on 5. Sen. Johnson NduyaMuthama – Senate Minority Leader Leader counties Whip Tuesday, 6. Sen. Onesmus Kipchumba Murkomen 09.02.16 7. Sen. Beth Mugo 8. Sen. KiraituMurungi 9. Sen. (Prof.) John Lonyangapuo 10. Sen. James Orengo 11. Sen. Janet Ong’era 12. Sen. (Dr.) Agnes Zani THAT, pursuant to Standing Order 16, the Senate Adopted approves the nomination of Senator Stephen Sang to Deputy without replace Senator Kipchumba Murkomen as a member of Senate Does not Wednesday, Senate Thursday, amendment 2. the Chairpersons Panel and to further preside over the Majority affect - 10.02.16 Minority 11.02.16 s on Senate in the absence of the Speaker and the Deputy Leader counties Leader Thursday, Speaker pursuant to Article 107(1)(c) of the Constitution 11.02.16 and Standing Order 18 of the Senate. Deputy THAT, pursuant to Standing Order Nos. 177(3) Senate Does not Adopted Wednesday, Senate Thursday, 3. &179(1), the Senate approves the nomination of Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Kenya the Senate
    March 13, 2014 SENATE DEBATES 1 PARLIAMENT OF KENYA THE SENATE THE HANSARD Thursday, 13th March, 2014 The Senate met at the County Hall, Parliament Buildings, at 2.30 p.m. [The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro) in the Chair] PRAYERS The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro): Hon. Senators, let us proceed with today’s business. I think there is a document to be laid. Chairperson, Committee on Health, Labour and Social Welfare, proceed. NOTICES OF MOTIONS APPROVAL OF MEMBERS FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE PARLIAMENTARY SERVICE COMMISSION Sen. (Dr.) Kuti: Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. I beg to give notice of the following Motion:- THAT, this House adopts the report of the Standing Committee on Health, Labour and Social Welfare on the approval of nomination of Hon. (Dr.) Abdullahi Ibrahim Ali and Mrs. Lonah Mumelo to be members of the--- The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro): Order, Chairman! What are you giving? Sen. (Dr.) Kuti: Mr. Speaker, Sir, a notice of Motion. The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro): Have you laid the Paper on the Table? We will allow you to get organised because of the special circumstances of the Motion. (Sen. (Dr.) Kuti consulted the Clerks-at-the-Table) Sen. (Dr.) Kuti, we will come back to that particular event. Are you now ready? Sen. (Dr.) Kuti: Mr. Speaker, Sir, let us get back. The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro): Are there any other notices of Motions? Yes, Majority Leader. Disclaimer: The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate March 13, 2014 SENATE DEBATES 2 APPROVAL OF SENATORS TO MEMBERSHIP OF SENATE COMMITTEES The Senate Majority Leader (Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Kenya the Senate
    August 31, 2017 SENATE DEBATES 1 PARLIAMENT OF KENYA THE SENATE THE HANSARD Thursday, 31st August, 2017 Twelfth Parliament – First Sitting (Convened by notification vide Legal Notice No.220 of 2017) (The Senate met at 9.00 a.m. at the Senate Chamber Main Parliament Buildings, Nairobi, on Thursday, 31st August, 2017, it being the first sitting of the Senate) (The proceedings were opened with a prayer read by the Clerk of the Senate (Mr. Nyegenye)) COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLERK OF THE SENATE WELCOME TO HON. SENATORS AND NOTIFICATION OF PLACE AND TIME OF FIRST SITTING OF THE SENATE The Clerk of the Senate (Mr. Nyegenye): Hon. Senators, it is my pleasure and privilege to welcome you to this first sitting of the Senate. I take this opportunity to congratulate you all on your election to the Senate. Hon. Senators, Senate Standing Order No.3 (1) (a) provides as follows:- “On the first sitting of a new Senate pursuant to the President’s notification under Article 126(2) of the Constitution, the Clerk shall- (a) read the notification of the President as published in the Gazette. Hon. Senators, pursuant to this provision of the Standing Orders, I now proceed to read the notification of the President. It is as follows:- “LEGAL NOTICE No.220 THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA FIRST SITTING OF THE SENATE I paraphrase:- “In EXERCISE of the powers conferred by Article 126(2) of the Constitution of Kenya, His Excellency the President and Commander-in- Disclaimer: The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • TJRC Report Volume 2B (Pre-Interference)
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation I. Core TJRC Related Documents Commission of Kenya 5-3-2013 Final Report - TJRC Report Volume 2B (Pre-Interference) Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core Recommended Citation Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Commission, "Final Report - TJRC Report Volume 2B (Pre-Interference)" (2013). I. Core TJRC Related Documents. 153. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/tjrc-core/153 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the The Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission of Kenya at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in I. Core TJRC Related Documents by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION KENYA Volume IIB REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION Volume IIB Volume IIB © Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission, 2013 This publication is available as a pdf on the website of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (and upon its dissolution, on the website of its successor in law). It may be copied and distributed, in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission and used for noncommercial educational or public policy purposes. Photographs may not be used separately from the publication. Published by Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC), Kenya ISBN: 978-9966-1730-3-4 Design & Layout by Noel Creative Media Limited, Nairobi, Kenya D REPORT OF THE TRUTH, JUSTICE AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION His Excellency President of the Republic of Kenya Nairobi 3 May 2013 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL By Gazette Notice No.
    [Show full text]
  • National Constitutional Conference Documents
    NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL CONFERENCE DOCUMENTS THE FINAL REPORT OF TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP “G” ON DEVOLUTION OF POWERS APPROVED FOR ISSUE AT THE 110 TH PLENARY MEETING OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA REVIEW COMMISSION HELD ON 30 NOVEMBER, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page: 1. Introduction……………………………………………………… 4 1.1 Committee Mandate……………………………………… 4 1.2 Method of Work…………………………………………. 5 1.3 Role of Experts…………………………………………… 6 1.4 Study Visit………………………………………………… 6 2. Committee Debate………………………………………………. 6 2.1 Principles of Devolution………………………………….. 7 2.2 Levels of Government……………………………………. 8 2.3 Units of Devolution………………………………………. 9 2.4 Variation of Boundaries………………………………….. 10 2.5 Distribution of Functions…………………………………. 11 2.6 Finance and Fiscal Management…………………………. 12 2.7 Taxation Powers…………………………………………. 13 2.8 Borrowing by Governments……………………………… 14 2.9 Public service at devolved levels of government………… 14 2.10 The Senate……………………………………………….. 14 2.11 Balance of gender and diversity…………………………. 15 2.12 Government during transition …………………………… 15 2.13 Removal of Elected Leaders…………………………….. 15 2.14 Publication of laws………………………………………. 15 2.15 Conflict of laws………………………………………….. 15 2.16 Recommendations on Transition………………………… 16 3. Conclusion………………………………………………………. 16 4. Analysis Of Issues On The Report And Draft Bill …………… 17 4.1 General Debate…………………………………………… 17 4.1.1 The Devolution Structure………………………… 17 4.1.2 Principles of Devolution…………………………. 17 4.1.3 Role and Place of Local Government ……………. 17 4.1.4 Structure and Management of Nairobi……………. 19 4.2 Analysis of the Draft Bill…………………………………. 19 4.2.1 Part I Structure and Principles of Devolved Government……………………………………….. 19 4.2.2 Part II Regions…………………………………….. 24 4.2.3 Part III—Districts…………………………………. 29 4.2.4 Part IV – Locations……………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Kenya the Senate
    April 24, 2013 SENATE DEBATES 1 PARLIAMENT OF KENYA THE SENATE THE HANSARD Wednesday, 24th April, 2013 The Senate met at the Kenyatta International Conference Centre at 2.30 p.m. [The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro) in the Chair] PRAYERS QUORUM CALL AT COMMENCEMENT OF SITTING The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro): Order, hon. Senators! We have the requisite quorum. Let us proceed. NOTICES OF MOTIONS APPROVAL OF MEMBERS OF THE CHAIRPERSONS PANEL The Senate Majority Leader (Sen. (Prof.) Kindiki: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I beg to give notice of the following two Motions:- THAT, pursuant to Standing Order No.16, the Senate approves the following Senators to be Members of the Chairpersons Panel and further, pursuant to Article 107(1)(c) of the Constitution, to be elected to preside at any sitting of the Senate in the absence of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker:- 1. Sen. Kipchumba Murkomen 2. Sen. Masha Elizabeth Ongoro Disclaimer: The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate. April 24, 2013 SENATE DEBATES 2 APPROVAL OF SENATORS TO MEMBERSHIP OF SENATE COMMITTEES THAT, pursuant to Standing Order No.177, the Senate approves the following Senators nominated by the Rules and Business Committee to be Members of the respective Committees as indicated below:- 1. STANDING COMMITTEES A. COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES 1. Sen. Kivuti Lenny 2. Sen. Khaniri George 3. Sen. Melly Isaac 4. Sen. Chelule Liza 5. Sen. Lesuuda Naisula 6. Sen. Ong’era Janet 7.
    [Show full text]
  • EAC Students Free to Transfer Credits
    The SPECIAL REPORT GOVERNMENT FINALLY LEGALIZES LOCAL BREWS — Pages 14 & 19 SUPPLEMENT LEnhancingink governance for all PARTNERSHIP FOR — Pages 15 - 18 OCTOBER 2010 Issue No. 072 Kshs 40/= EU PEACE PROJECT CDF looters put on notice By FAITH MUIRURI Kituo Cha Sheria to start private legal ENYANS can now move to court to recover bil- lions of shillings lost through massive corruption and looting of devolved funds. proceedings against suspects A number of provisions in the new constitution Kprovide a solid foundation for litigation. Article 35 allows a person acting on public interest to move to court and seek redress in case of denial, violation, threat or infringement of rights Already Kituo Cha Sheria is compiling a list of cases that point to blatant embezzlement of public funds with a view to instituting private legal prosecutions on behalf of the aggrieved constituencies. “Some of these cases will inform the basis of our private prosecution,” says the Executive Director of Kituo Cha Sheria Priscilla Nyokabi. She says that the organization is currently focusing on the Constituency Development Fund (CDF) and will soon file criminal proceedings against corrupt officials in the affected constituencies. She says that in the past, CDF has been considered as a political question where the MPs besides being legislators un- dertook the role of implementers and watchdogs of the CDF activities and therefore imposed a major constraint on effec- tiveness and transparency of the fund “The current institutional arrangement of the CDF and the political context are particularly prone to abuse,” avers Nyoka- bi during an interview with The Link.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Kenya the Senate
    July 5, 2016 SENATE DEBATES 1 PARLIAMENT OF KENYA THE SENATE THE HANSARD Tuesday, 5th July, 2016 The House met at the Senate Chamber, Parliament Buildings, at 2.30 p.m. [The Speaker (Hon. Ethuro) in the Chair] PRAYERS PETITIONS PETITION BY THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS OF THE KIRINYAGA MIHIRIGA KENDA REGARDING THEIR CLAIM TO THE MWEA TRUST LAND Sen. Karaba: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. I presented a Petition on behalf of the Kirinyaga Miherega Kenda; that is the nine clans, concerning the border dispute between Kirinyaga and Embu counties in respect of the 54,000 acres known as Mwea Trust Land. The Petition was thereafter committed to the Standing Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights which pursuant to Standing Order No.227 was required to respond by way of a report addressed to the petitioners and laid on the Table of the Senate in not more than 60 calendar days. My point of order relates to the time it has taken to have the Petition heard and determined by the said Committee. Under Standing Order No.227(2), the report of the Committee should have been tabled before the Senate on or before 13th July, 2015. It is now one year from the date the report was due. I have no indication when the Committee will consider the Petition and present its report as required by the Standing Orders. This matter is very important to the people of Kirinyaga. When I presented the Petition on 13th May, 2015, I informed the House that tension in the affected area was rising by day as a result of rival claims to the land by the Miherega Kenda people of Kirinyaga County on one hand and the Mbeere and the Kamba people of Embu County, on the other hand.
    [Show full text]