DOCSLIB.ORG

Perpetual Peace

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perpetual Peace PERPETUAL PEACE *For I dipt into thefuture, far as hamnn eye could TCC, Saw the Vision of the world, and all thcwonder thr: waxld Le; Snw theheavens fill with commerce, argosies of magicsails, Pi!o!s of thopurple twilight, dropping d>wnwith eosrj? bales: Heardthe heavens fill withnlmlting, and there rsin'd a ghastly dew From the nations' airynavies grappling in thecentm! b!uo; Far dong the world.widc whisper of the south-wind rushing warm, With the standards of the peoplesplunging thro' tkc thunder.storm: Till thewar-drum throbb'd no longer, and the bntt.e.flags were fuurl'd In tho Parliament of man, the Federation of the world. Thew the common sense of mmt shall hold a f3etf::l realm in awe, And the kindly earth ahall dumbor, lapt in universal hw." -' ' TSNNYSON:LcrRslry HER PERPETUAL PEACE A PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY Tr7.rlSSLATED WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES BY 31. CAMPBELLSMITH, M.A. :67?'il .4 PREFACE BY I'I<CFl:'.SSOR LATTA LONDON: GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD. RUSKIN HOUSE 40 MUSEUMSTREET, W.C. NEW YORK : THE IvIAChlILLAN COMPANY PREFACE THIStranslation of Kant’sessay on PerptuaP Peace was undertaken by Miss Mary Campbell Smith at the suggestion of thelate Professor Ritchie of St. Andrews, who had promised to write for it a preface,indicating the value of Kant’s work in relation to recent discussions regarding the possibility of ‘I making wars to cease.” In view of the general interest which these discussions have arousedand of thevague thinking and aspiration which have too often characterised them, it seemed to Professor Ritchie that atranslation of this wise and sagaciousessay would be both opportuneand valuable. * His untimely deathhas prevented the fulfilment of his promise, and I have been asked, in his stead,to introduce thetranslator’s work. This is, I think, the only completetranslation into English of Kant’s essay, including all the notes as well as thetext, and the translatorhas added a full historicalIntroduction, along with numerous notes of her own, so as (in Professor Ritchie’s words) ‘I to meet the needs (I) of the student of Political vi Preface Sciencewho wishes to understandthe relation of Kant’s theories to those of Grotius, Hobbes, Locke, Kousseau etc.,and (2) of thegeneral reader who wishes tounderstand the significance of Kant’s proposals in connection with the ideals of Peace Congresses, and with the developmentof International Law from the end of the Middle Ages to the Hague Conference.” Although it is morethan 100 years since Kant‘s essay was written, its substantial va!ue is practically unimpaired.Anyone who is acquainted with the generalcharacter of the mind of Kant will expect to find in him soundcommon-sense, clearrecogni- tion of the essential facts of the case and a remark- able power of analytically exhibiting the conditions on which the factsnecessarily depend.These characteristics are manifest iu the essay on Perpetual A,ore. Kant is not pessimist enough to believe that a perpetual peace is an unrealisable dream or a consummationdevoutly to be feared, nor is he optimistenough to fancy thatit is an ideal which could easily be realised if men would butturn their hearts toone another. For Kant perpetual peace is an ideal, notmerely as a speculative Utopian idea, with which in fancy we mayplay, but as amoral principle, which oughtto be, and therefore can be, realised. Yet he makes it perfectly clear that we cannot hope to approach therealisation Preface vii of itunless we honestly face political facts and get a firmgrasp of theindispensable conditions of a lasting peace. To strive after the ideal in contempt or in ignorance of these conditions is a labour that must inevitablybe either fruitless ordestructive of itsown ends, Thus Kantdemonstrates the hope- lessness of anyattempt to secure perpetual peace betweenindependent nations. Such nations may maketreaties; but these are binding only for so longas it is notto the interest of eitherparty to denouncethem. To enforcethem is impossible while thenations remain independent. “There is,” as Professor Ritchie put it (Sttrdies in Political and Social Ethics, p. 169), lionly one way inwhich war betweenindependent “’nations can be prevented ; andthat is bythe nations ceasing to be indepen- dent.”But this does not necessarily mean the establishment of despotism,a whether autocratic ordemocratic. On the other hand, Kant maintains that just aspeace between individuals within a statecan only be permanently secured by the institution of a“republican ” (that is to say, a representative) government, so the onlyreal guarantee of permanenta peace between nations is the establishment of a federation of free “republican” states.Such a federation heregards as practically possible. 11 “For if Fortune ordains that a powerful andenlightened people should form a republic- viii Preface which by its verynature is inclined toperpetual peace-thiswould serve a centre of federal unionfor other states wishing to join, andthus secure.’conditionsof freedom among the states in accordancewith the idea of thelaw of nations. Gradually,through different unions of thiskind, thefederation would extend further and further.” Readers who areacquainted with the general philosophy of Kant will find manytraces of its influence inthe essay on Perpetual Peace. Those who haveno knowledge of hisphilosophy may find some of his forms of statement rather difficult to understand,and it may therefore not be out of place for meto indicate very briefly themeaning of some terms which he frequently uses, especially inthe Supplements and Appendices. Thus at the beginning of theFirst Supplement, Kant draws a distinctionbetween the mechanical and the teleo- logical view of things, between “nature” and “ Provi- dence ”, which depends upon his main philosophical position.According to Kant, pure reason has two aspects,theoretical and practical. Asconcerning knowledge, strictly so called, the a priori principles ofreason (e.g, substanceand attribute, cause and effect etc.)are valid only within therealm of possible sense-experience. Such ideas, forinstance, cannotbe extended to God, since He is not a possible object of sense-experience, They are limited Frefare ix t to the world of phenomena. This world of pheno- mena (‘1 nature ” or the world of sense-experience) is purelya mechanical system. But in order to understand fully thephenomenal world, thepure theoretical reasonmust postulate certain ideas (the ideas of the soul, the world and God), theobjects of which transcendsense-experience. Theseideas are nottheoreticallp valid, buttheir validity is practically established by the pure practical reason, which doesnot yieldspeculative truth,but pre- scribes its principlesdogmatically ” in the form of. imperatives to the will. ‘\ The will is itself practical’ reason, andthus it imposesits imperativesupon. itself. The fundamental imperative of the practical’ reason is stated by Kant in Appendix I. (p. 175) :- (I Act so that thou canst will that thy maxim should be a universal law, be the end of thy actionwhat it will.” If theend of perpetualpeace is a duty, it must be necessarily deduced from this general law. AndKant does regard it as duty.a We mustdesire perpetual peacenot only as a material good, but also as a state of things resulting from our recognition of the precepts of duty ” (loc. lit.). This is further expressed in the maxim (p. 177):- “Seek ye first the kingdom of pure practical reason and its righteousness, andthe object of your endeavour, the blessing of perpetual peace, will be addedunto you.” The distinction between the X Preyme moral politician and the political moralist, which is developed in Appendix I., is an application of the gcneral distinction between dutyand expediency, which is a prominent feature of the Kantian ethics. Methods of.expediency, omitting all reference to the purepractical reason, can only bringabout re-arrangements of circumstances in the mechanical course of nature. Theycan never guaranteethe attainment of theirend: they can never make it more than a speculative ideal, which may or may notbe practicable. But if theend can be shown to be a duty, we have, from Kant’s point of view, the onlyreasonable ground for a conviction that it is realisable. We cannot,indeed, theoretically know that it is realisable. “Reason is not suffi- cieutly enlightened to survey the series of predeter- mining causes which would make it possible for us to predict with certainty the good or bad results of human action, asthey follow from the mechanical laws of nature; although we mayhope that things will turnout as we should desire” (p. 163). On the other hand, since the idea of perpetual peace is a moral ideal,an idea of duty ”, we are entitled to believe that it is practicable. ,. I( Nature guarantees the coming of perpetual peace, through the natural course of human propensities ; not indeed with sufficient certainty toenable us to prophesy She future of this ideal theoretically, but yet clearly i I Prrface xi .: enough for practicalpurposes ” (p. I 57). Onemight extend this discussion indefinitely ; but what has been saidmay suffice for generalguidance. The fi wise and sagacious ” thought of Kant is not expressed in a simple style, and the translatioll has consequently been a very difficult piece of jvork. But thetranslator has shown great skill in manipulating the involutions, parentheses and prodigious sentences of the original. In this she has had the valuable help of Mr. David Morrison, hl.A., who revised the whole translation with the greatest care and to whom she owes the solution of a number of difficulties. Her work will have it5 fitting reward if it succeeds in familiarising the English-speaking student of politics with a political essay of enduring value,written by one of the masterthinkers of modern times. R. LATTA. CONTENTS ?AG. PREFACE BY PROFESSORLATTA ......V TRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION * * PERPETUALPEACE s . - * - * * FIRSTSECTION CONTAINING THE PRELIMINARY ARTICLES OF PERPETUALPEACE BETWEEN STATES...*.*...*..* SECOND SECTION CONTAMING TILE DEFINITIVE ARTICLES OF PERPETUALPEACE BETWEEN STATES. ............ FIRST SUPPLEMENT CONCERh'IKGTHE GUARAKTEE OF PERPETUALPEACE .......
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kant's Foedus Pacificum
    University of Texas Rio Grande Valley ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations College of Liberal Arts 12-2020 Kant’s foedus pacificum: athP to peace or prolegomena to neoliberalism and authoritarian corporatist globalization in contemporary liberal democratic states? Terence Garrett University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/pol_fac Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Garrett, Terence. 2020. “Kant’s Foedus Pacificum: Path to Peace or Prolegomena to Neoliberalism and Authoritarian Corporatist Globalization in Contemporary Liberal Democratic States?” Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 23 (2): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.23.2.01. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts at ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. It has been accepted for inclusion in Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life 2020 Vol. 23, No. 2, 7–20 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1899-2226.23.2.01 Terence M. Garrett University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Public Affairs and Security Studies Department Department of Political Science e-mail: [email protected] Kant’s foedus pacificum: Path to peace or prolegomena to neoliberalism and authoritarian corporatist globalization in contemporary liberal democratic states? Abstract Immanuel Kant’s language and concept of foedus pacificum (league of peace) combined with his call for a spirit of trade promised a prescription for world peace—“seeking to end all wars forever” (Kant, 1795/1983, p.
    [Show full text]
  • HABERMAS [Kabinettskriege], Philosophy Assumed This Role a Second Time
    8 Does the Constitutionalization of International Law Still Have a Chance?1 The Introduction Divided As the European system of states was taking shape, phi losophy, in the persons of Francisco Suarez, Hugo Grotius, West and Samuel Pufendorf, still played the role of pacemaker in the creation of modern international law. Moreover, when legally constrained international relations later stabilized at the level of violence of so-called cabinet wars BY JORGEN HABERMAS [Kabinettskriege], philosophy assumed this role a second time. With his conception of a-"cosmopolitan condition" or "wekburgerlichen Zustand," Kant took a decisive step Edited and Translated by beyond international law centered exclusively on states. Since then, international law has not only developed into CIABAN CRONIN a specialized brand of legal theory. Following two world wars, the constitutionalization of international law has evolved along the lines prefigured by Kant toward cosmo politan law and has assumed institutional form in inter national constitutions, organizations, and procedures.2 Since the end of the bipolar world order and the emergence of the US as the pre-eminent world power, an alternative to the evolution of a cosmopolitan constitution has emerged. A world dominated by nation-states is indeed 2-00 in transition toward the postnational constellation of a polity global society. States are losing their autonomy in part as they become increasingly enmeshed in the horizontal 115 THE KANTIAN PROJECT THE CXJNSTITUTIONALIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW networks of a global society.3 But in this situation the accord priority to its own, ethically rather than legally, Kantian project of a cosmopolitan order not only has to justified national interests, even over the objections of its confront the traditional objection of "realists" who affirm allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Perpetual Peace, a Philosophical Essay, by Immanuel Kant, 1795
    Perpetual peace, a philosophical essay, by Immanuel Kant, 1795; tr. with introduction and notes by M. Campbell Smith ... with a preface by Professor Latta. Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804. London, G. Allen & Unwin ltd.; [1915] http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015063009818 Public Domain in the United States, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-us-google We have determined this work to be in the public domain in the United States of America. It may not be in the public domain in other countries. Copies are provided as a preservation service. Particularly outside of the United States, persons receiving copies should make appropriate efforts to determine the copyright status of the work in their country and use the work accordingly. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. Generated for member (Columbia University) on 2015-09-09 17:18 GMT / http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015063009818 Public Domain in the United States, Google-digitized / http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-us-google PERPETUAL PEACE A PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAY BY IMMANUEL KANT 1 795 Translated with Introduction and Notes BY M.
    [Show full text]
  • Perpetual Peace? Critical Remarks on Mortimer J
    Perpetual Peace? Critical Remarks on Mortimer J. Adler's Book By Waldemar Gurian jj\4ORTIMER J. Adler's much quoted address in which he castigated American professors has been widely misunderstood. When he declared that their errors were more dangerous than -the threat from Hitler, he did not intend to discount them. On the contrary, he was paying a most impressive compliment, to the importance and effect of their writings and other activities. Adler is professor of the philosophy of law in the University of Chicago, and his yardstick must be applied to himself. It would be inappropriate to pass over his How to Think About War and Peace' in silence or to regard it as an unimportant and uninfluential work. This new book, praised as a product of hard thinking, will be read only by few, even though it will be bought by many in response to the intense propaganda of the publisher. Adler claims that he describes the necessary approach to a most urgent problem. It is true that he modestly abstains from presenting any blueprints for the postwar world. He humbly abandons to Prime Minister Churchill and President Roosevelt a concern with such mat- ters of immediate practical importance as relations with the Soviet Union or the fate of Germany. But on the other hand, he is more ambitious than those who are preoccupied with planning for our gen- eration. He is trying not only to find principles of thought about peace and war but also to circumscribe the realm and the, direction of pract- ical, meaningful work in behalf of a truly lasting, and therefore uni- versal and perpetual, peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism, Peace, and the Historical Movement of Ideas
    International Interactions, 36:169–184, 2010 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0305-0629 print/1547-7444 online DOI: 10.1080/03050621003785066 GINI0305-06291547-7444International Interactions,Interactions Vol. 36, No. 2, Apr 2010:Capitalism, pp. 0–0 Peace, and the Historical Movement of Ideas Capitalism,J. Mueller Peace, and Historical Movement of Ideas JOHN MUELLER Ohio State University A logical and causal exploration of the growing acceptance of capitalism and peace, or war aversion, is part of what Robert Dahl has called “the historical movement of ideas.” Although war aversion and the acceptance of free-market capitalism have undergone parallel and substantially overlapping historical trajectories, support for capitalism does not on its own logically or necessarily imply war aversion or support for peace. Not only must capital- ism be embraced as an economic system, but at least three other ideas must be accepted as well: prosperity and economic growth must be taken as a dominant goal; peace must be seen as a better motor than war for development, progress, and innovation; and trade, rather than conquest, must be held to be the best way to achieve the dominant goal. Moreover, the causal direction may well be misspecified: it is not that free-market capitalism and the economic development it spawns cause peace, but rather that peace causes—or facilitates—capitalism and its attendant economic development. This also may explain why peace is more closely associ- ated with capitalism than with democracy. KEYWORDS capitalism, democracy, ideas, peace, war Downloaded By: [Ohio State University Libraries] At: 17:49 20 December 2010 Robert Dahl has observed that “because of their concern with rigor and their dissatisfaction with the ‘softness’ of historical description, generalization, and explanation,” most social scientists have turned away from what he calls, “the historical movement of ideas”.
    [Show full text]
  • Herder's Debate with Kant
    [Intellectual History Archive 2, 2018] Piirimäe, Imperialism and Peace HUMAN RIGHTS, IMPERIALISM AND PEACE AMONG NATIONS: HERDER’S DEBATE WITH KANT Eva Piirimäe,12 University of Tartu I Human rights is a central normative idea in contemporary political thinking. Yet it is also increasingly common to argue that this idea is not a ‘fixed thing’. As Lynn Hunt has suggested, it is rather a ‘field of conflict’ or ‘a programme, an outlook, embedded in our political and cultural imagination and sensibility’.3 Perhaps it is therefore not entirely surprising that strongly diverging interpretations have been put forward about the origins of this idea during the recent decade. Lynn Hunt herself has charted its complex and often ruptured evolution, tracing its origins back to the emerging values of bodily integrity and empathetic selfhood in the eighteenth century.4 Samuel Moyn, by contrast, has argued that there is not much in common between the Enlightenment’s ‘eternal’ or natural rights of man and human rights, the latter constituting ‘a different conception altogether’.5 The Enlightenment’s natural rights were to be achieved through the construction of spaces of citizenship in which rights were accorded and protected, while human rights are ‘entitlements that might contradict the sovereign nation-state from above and outside’.6 Even more recently, in an Oxford Amnesty lecture of 2012, James Tully has restated the idea of the Enlightenment origins of human rights, focusing on the ways in which rights are derived and seen to be implemented both within states as well as outside them.7 In his lecture, Tully provides what he characterises as a ‘simple historical overview’ of two distinctive traditions of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Emancipation and Kantian Critique 'Towards Perpetual Peace'*
    PSA 66th Annual International Conference, 21-23 March 2016, Brighton Emancipation and Kantian Critique ‘Towards Perpetual Peace’* Mustafa A. Sezal Yildirim Beyazit University [email protected] In 1784, Immanuel Kant wrote an essay response to the question “what is enlightenment?” that was posed previous year by Reverend Johann Friedrich Zellner in the monthly magazine Berlinische Monatsschrift. According to him, enlightenment was human being’s ‘emancipation from its self-incurred immaturity’1. Kant’s description of enlightenment provides us a starting point for a deeper analysis of his other political writings, moral principles, and their relationship to Critical Theory. Therefore, this paper seeks to locate Kantian ‘good will’ in his political philosophy that would lead to ‘perpetual peace’. Then, building upon Andrew Linklater’s works on ‘cosmopolitan harm conventions’2, ‘civilising processes’3, and ‘emancipation’4 will argue that emancipatory International Relations (IR) and Security Studies are essentially Kantian. Emancipatory project of Critical Security Studies (CSS) can thus be linked to Kant’s cosmopolitanism and articles of perpetual peace that, in a sense, depicts the elaborate intricacies of Kantian philosophy in IR that goes beyond the simplistic view of ‘democratic/liberal peace thesis/theory’. Kant’s political philosophy is essentially a continuation or a macro-projection of his moral philosophy. In this vein, understanding political notions such as ‘perpetual peace’ need a brief introduction through his moral philosophy and particularly the ‘categorical imperative’. In the Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals, Kant describes the ‘categorical imperative’5 through a two-dimensional formulation: “Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” and “[a]ct as though the maxim of your action were to become by your will a universal law of nature”6.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberystwyth University the Idea of a Liberal Democratic Peace
    Aberystwyth University The idea of a liberal democratic peace Williams, Howard Published in: The Edinburgh Companion to contemporary Liberalism Publication date: 2001 Citation for published version (APA): Williams, H. (2001). The idea of a liberal democratic peace. In The Edinburgh Companion to contemporary Liberalism (pp. 241-53). Edinburgh University Press. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 18. Apr. 2020 The idea of a liberal democratic peace An impressive literature has developed in recent years dealing with the topic of a liberal democratic peace. A debate has been conducted in North American and British political science journals such as International Security, American Political ScienceReview, Comparative Political Studies and Review of International Studies about the validity of the hypothesis that the growth in the number of states with liberal-democratic polities will lead to a more stable and harmonious international order.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Our Way out of War: Perpetual Peace Without Politics*
    Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais 116 | 2018 Número semitemático Trading Our Way out of War: Perpetual Peace without Politics Comércio em vez de guerra: paz perpétua sem política Le commerce plutôt que la guerre: paix perpétuelle sans politique Patrícia Vieira Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rccs/7088 DOI: 10.4000/rccs.7088 ISSN: 2182-7435 Publisher Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra Printed version Date of publication: 1 September 2018 Number of pages: 5-22 ISSN: 0254-1106 Electronic reference Patrícia Vieira, « Trading Our Way out of War: Perpetual Peace without Politics », Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais [Online], 116 | 2018, Online since 31 July 2018, connection on 11 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rccs/7088 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rccs.7088 Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 116, setembro 2018: 5-22 PATRÍCIA VIEIRA Trading Our Way out of War: Perpetual Peace without Politics Proponents of perpetual peace have often identified politics as a problem standing in the way of peaceful relations between humans. They believed that, while politics exac- erbates the differences separating nations, commerce brings human beings together. In this article, I trace the development of arguments against politics and for commerce from the late fifteenth to the early nineteenth century. I argue that thinkers espoused an idealized view of commerce as an activity that fostered the development of a peace- ful international community, while gradually eliminating economic inequalities. I also highlight how these arguments still resonate with today’s debates on globalization. Keywords: conflicts resolution; economic relations; free trade; globalization; peacebuild- ing; perpetual peace; political relations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Concept of Perpetual Peace in the History of Political-Legal Thought
    277 The evolution of the concept of perpetual peace in the history of political-legal thought Bogumil Terminski* Abstract The subject of this work is the question of the philosophical evolution and legal concept of perpetual peace throughout history. Its aim is also to show the importance of the issue to our broad understanding of the causative agents of development concepts for the rights of individuals, communities and human rights position in the surrounding world. The views enunciated by philosophers, thinkers and authors of the law of nations constitute the base on which not only Euro-American culture is resisting but also our contemporary understanding of society, individual liberty and fundamental human rights. That is why so important to undertaken within the discourse on human rights is to show the historical, philosophical and legal genesis of such issues as the evolution of the theory of peaceful coexistence, collective security or religious tolerance and minority rights. Presented in this work an analysis is not exhaustive. I assume that it is the task of presenting mainly the most important currents of thought and encourage the reader to further study, while leaving sufficient space for own thoughts. Introduction The phenomena of peace and war constitute the eternal and immanent elements of the history of mankind. It is assumed that they originate in the deeply rooted in the human nature lust for power, prestige and respect. That drive is characteristic of individuals, as well as entire nations, and often becomes apparent on the level of foreign policies of states. Waging wars or striving for peace are two basic instruments for countries thanks to which they pursue their vital interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The War Over Perpetual Peace: an Exploration Into the History of a Foundational International Relations Text
    THE WAR OVER PERPETUAL PEACE: AN EXPLORATION INTO THE HISTORY OF A FOUNDATIONAL INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS TEXT Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of. Philosophy in International Relations at the London School of Economics and Political Science Eric Sheridan Easley 2002 UMI Number: U166538 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U166538 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Z°iZZoo ABSTRACT Immanuel Kant's Perpetual Peace is widely recognized as a foundational International Relations text. My research has uncovered a variety of competing interpretations of the work since its initial publication in the late eighteenth century. This thesis examines English-language commentary on the treatise from the mid­ nineteenth to the end of the twentieth century. It demonstrates the existence of two distinct patterns of interpretation. According to my analysis, interpretations from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth century assert that the text endorses peace proposals above the state level. This collection of interpretations constitutes Pattern One. Interpretations from the mid-twentieth century to its end, however, maintain that the text is in favor of peace proposals at the state level.
    [Show full text]
  • Kantian Liberalism, Regime Type, and Military Resource Allocation: Do Democracies Spend Less?
    International Studies Quarterly (2005) 49, 141–157 Kantian Liberalism, Regime Type, and Military Resource Allocation: Do Democracies Spend Less? BENJAMIN O. FORDHAM Binghamton University (SUNY) THOMAS C.WALKER University at Albany (SUNY) In this paper, we evaluate the liberal claim that democratic states devote fewer resources to their militaries. Low military spending is thought to avert conflict spirals and release more resources to fund domestic programs. While prominent in many liberal international relations theories, most notably in Immanuel Kant’s, this proposition has received little empirical scrutiny. Using several indicators of military resource allocation and data on a wide range of states since 1816, we find em- pirical support for the liberal argument, although regime type is not necessarily the strongest influence on military resource allocation. Liberal paths to peace have recently received a great deal of attention in interna- tional relations. Much of this recent research has been associated with the philos- ophy of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). Kant’s political thought has come to provide a coherent theoretical foundation for liberalism in international relations. Conjec- tures on the democratic peace, the effects of international organizations, trade, and globalization are frequently traced back to ideas put forth by Kant. The works of Bruce Russett and John Oneal (2001; Oneal and Russett, 1997, 1999; Russett, 1998) stand as examples of how an initial reliance on Kantian conjectures has led to refined hypotheses and significant findings supporting liberal expectations. Russett and Oneal (2001:271) construct a ‘‘Kantian triangle of peace’’ consisting of three elements: ‘‘republican constitutions, ‘cosmopolitan-law’ embodied in free trade and economic interdependence, and international law and organizations.’’ While re- Authors’ note: Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2001 annual meeting of the Peace Science Society (International), and the 2002 annual meeting of the International Studies Association.
    [Show full text]