Disability in Scotland a Baseline Study

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disability in Scotland a Baseline Study Disability Rights Commission Disability in Scotland A Baseline Study Sheila Riddell and Pauline Banks A report prepared for the Disability Rights Commission Scotland Office by the Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research, University of Glasgow, June 2001 The Disability Rights Commission The Disability Rights Commission (DRC) is an independent body, established by Act of Parliament to eliminate the discrimination faced by disabled people and promote equality of opportunity. When disabled people participate - as citizens, customers and employees - everyone benefits. So we have set ourselves the goal of “a society where all disabled people can participate fully as equal citizens”. We work with disabled people and their organisations, the business community, Government and public sector agencies to achieve practical solutions that are effective for employers, service providers and disabled people alike. There are roughly 8.5 million disabled people in Britain - one in seven of the population. This covers people with epilepsy, cancer, schizophrenia, Down’s syndrome and many other types of impairment. Under the Disability Discrimination Act (1995), many legal rights and obligations affecting disabled people’s access to services and employment are already in force. Others become law in 2004. Many people are still not aware that they have many new rights. And employers and service providers are often unsure how to implement “best practice” to make it easier for disabled people to use their services or gain employment. The DRC has offices in England, Scotland and Wales. We are here to assist and advise through our Helpline, Disability Conciliation Service, the Casework, Legal, and Practice Development Teams, publications, research and policy work. Disability in Scotland A Baseline Study Sheila Riddell and Pauline Banks Copyright (c) 2001 Disability Rights Commission Printed and bound by The James Harrop Printing Company, Glasgow The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Disability Rights Commission. Produced for the Disability Rights Commission Scotland Office by Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research Department of Social Policy and Social Work University of Glasgow Adam Smith Building Glasgow G12 8RT Tel: 0141 330 4545 Fax: 0141 330 3919 http://www.gla.ac.uk/centres/disabilityresearch/ Acknowledgements Sheila Riddell and Pauline Banks would like to acknowledge the advice and help given by the following people in producing this baseline study: Andrew Reid, Sue Warner, Jim Elder-Woodward, Margaret Whoriskey, Anne Marshall, Charlotte Pearson, Deborah Hopkins, Sally Witcher, Geraint Hughes, Adam Gaines, Lynn Welsh, Nick Watson, Graham Atherton, Wladyslaw Mejka and Alastair Wilson. In particular, we would like to thank Jean McPartland for producing the manuscript and, as ever, remaining calm as deadlines approached. ii Disability in Scotland Contents Page Number Acknowledgements ii List of Tables iv List of Figures v Abbreviations vi Foreword viii 1: Introduction 1 2: Disabled People and Education 15 3: Disabled People and Employment 37 4: Disabled People and Health and Social Care 57 5: Disabled People and Housing 87 6: Disabled People and Transport 105 7: Disabled People and Access to Goods and Services 112 8: Conclusion 117 9. References 125 iii A Baseline Study List of Tables 1.1 Responsibilities of the UK and Scottish Parliaments 4 2.1 Number and percentage of pupils with Records of Needs and special educational needs in Scottish education authorities 22 2.2 Number and % of pupils at special schools in Scotland by funding authority and % of special school pupils with Records of Needs 25 2.3 Number of pupils at special schools in Scotland by funding authority and gender 27 2.4 HE students in higher education institutions in Scotland 1998-99 by disability and level of study 28 2.5 HE students in higher education institutions in Scotland 1998-99 by institution and disability 30 2.6 Students in higher education in HEIs 1998-99 by disability and gender 31 2.7 HE students in HEIs in Scotland 1998-99 by Disabled Students’ Allowance and level of study 31 2.8 HE students in HEIs in Scotland 1998-99 by Disabled Students’ Allowance and gender 32 3.1 Economic activity of working age people by gender according to different definitions of disability: Scotland 1999 47 3.2 Recipients of disability benefits in Scotland, 2000 49 4.1 Number of day centres for people with mental health problems, number of places, and people attending 1985-1998 77 4.2 Number of local authority, private, and voluntary residential care homes for people with mental health problems, number of beds, and number of residents 1985-1999 77 4.3 Bed availability and psychiatric speciality 1985-1999 79 4.4 Age breakdown of patients in mental illness hospitals and psychiatric units at 31st March 1985-1999 80 5.1 Housing for disabled people: provision by public agencies and housing associations as at 31st March 1999: by agency 93 5.2 Housing for elderly and disabled people by Scottish authority 1997 95&96 6.1 Transport provision for physically disabled people travelling by bus in Scotland, 1998 108 6.2 Transport provision for physically disabled people at railway stations in Scotland, 1999 108 7.1 Convenience of various services by disability status, Scotland 1999 113 iv Disability in Scotland List of Figures 1.1 Disabled people in particular age groups expressed as percentage 12 1.2 Working age population of disabled people by sex, Scotland 1999 13 2.1 Pupils with Records of Needs in mainstream and special schools (%) in Scottish education authorities by educating authority 24 2.2 Main impairment of pupils with a Record of Needs by gender (numbers) 26 3.1 Disabled people of working age in the labour market, Scotland 1999 44 3.2 Employment rate of men of working age population by disability status, Scotland 1999 45 3.3 Employment rate of women of working age population by disability status, Scotland 1999 46 3.4 Income for households with a disabled person living in them, Scotland 1999 50 3.5 Income for households without a disabled person living with them, Scotland 1999 50 4.1 Standardised mortality ratio for selected causes by administrative area, Scotland. (1999 Health in Scotland) 70 4.2 Number of patients admitted to hospital with a principal diagnosis of stroke by gender and year 71 4.3 Stroke: standardised mortality ratios (SMR) by deprivation category and age group (1994-98 based; ISD) 72 4.4 Incidence of stroke in the 45-64 age group (patients) by health board (1997-98; ISD) 73 4.5 Mental health: GP contacts (rate per 1,000 population) by deprivation category in Scotland, year ending March 2000 76 4.6 Number and age of long stay residents in homes for people with mental health problems 1985-1999 (frequency) 79 5.1 Housing tenure patterns in Scotland and England 88 5.2 Disabled people and tenure patterns in Britain 88 5.3 Home ownership in Great Britain and Scotland for total population and disabled people 88 5.4 Type of adaptations present and desired 97 6.1 Activities found difficult by age group 109 v A Baseline Study Abbreviations AHT Acute Hospital Trust CMR Continuous Morbidity Recording CoSLA Convention of Scottish Local Authorities DDA Disability Discrimination Act DEA Disability Employment Adviser DETR Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions DfE Department for Education DfEE Department for Education and Employment DoH Department of Health DPTAC Disabled Person’s Transport Advisory Committee DRC Disability Rights Commission DRTF Disability Rights Task Force DSA Disabled Student’s Allowance DSS Department of Social Security EA Education Authority ES Employment Service GB Great Britain GP General Practitioner HEI Higher Education Institution HESA Higher Education Statistics Agency HIA Health Impact Assessment HIP Health Improvement Programme IB Incapacity Benefit ILO International Labour Organisation ISD Information and Statistics Division LEA Local Education Authority LEC Local Enterprise Company NASiS National Health Service in Scotland NDDP New Deal for Disabled People NHS National Health Service PA Personal Adviser PAYE Pay as You Earn PCT Primary Care Trust RSAMD Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama RTP Residential Training Provider SEHD Scottish Executive Health Department vi Disability in Scotland SEN Special Educational Needs SHAS Scottish Health Advisory Service SMR Standardised Mortality Ration SOIED Scottish Office Education and Industry Department SWSI Social Work Services Inspectorate UK United Kingdom vii A Baseline Study Foreword This research report was commissioned by the Disability Rights Commission (DRC) Scotland Office as a major step towards highlighting the needs and rights of disabled people in Scotland. This work builds on much of the progress that has been made on raising awareness of disability issues, particularly since the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) was passed. With the establishment of the DRC we now have a new force to raise the debate on matters of concern for disabled people. The DRC exists to eliminate discrimination against disabled people and promote equality of opportunity. One of the functions of the DRC is to carry out research to inform discussion and policy-making and this report is aimed at contributing to knowledge in this area. Until now there has been no comprehensive overview of the picture of disability in Scotland and it was essential that this gap was filled. Our aim is that this research should be of value to all concerned with disability issues including disabled people; the Scottish Executive; academics and researchers; research funders; policymakers at local, regional, Scotland and UK level; MSPs and MPs. There are a number of people I would like to thank, in particular Sheila Riddell and Pauline Banks for their hard work in compiling this report with a very tight deadline. I’d also like to thank Sally Witcher for her work managing the project and members of the advisory group - Jim Elder-Woodward, Andrew Reid, Sue Warner and Margaret Whoriskey.
Recommended publications
  • Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of Child Deaths in the Four UK Countries
    Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Report produced by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health CHR-UK Programme of Work at the MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, University College London Institute of Child Health Report prepared by Pia Hardelid, Research Associate in Statistics Nirupa Dattani, Senior Data Coordinator Jonathan Davey, Data Manager Ivana Pribramska, Information Officer Ruth Gilbert, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology Acknowledgements RCPCH Programme Board: Neena Modi, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Alan McMahon, *#!(ƫ ++.!ČƫJohn Thain, Jyotsna Vohra. We also acknowledge Laura Gibbon of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health for managing the subcontract for the study. Child Death Overview Working Group: Rachel Knowles (UCL Institute of Child Health), Alison Macfarlane (City University), Berit Müller-Pebody (Public Health England), Roger Parslow (University of Leeds), Sonia Saxena (Imperial College), Anjali Shah (University of Oxford), Peter Sidebotham (University of Warwick) and Charles Stiller (University of Oxford). Additional input given by: Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Anna Pearce, and a clinician panel for chronic disease codes: Andrew McArdle, Quen Mok, Katja Doerholt, and Mike Sharland. Staff contributing on behalf of the data providers: ONS: Sue Dewane, Lois Cook, Joanne Copsey, Ruth Edwards, Liam Beardsmore, Vera Ruddock, Joanne Evans, Tony Hitching; HSCIC: Susan Milner, Gareth Dunning, Nicola Bootland, Richard Webster, Xanthe Hannah, Stephen Cowley; NISRA: Naomi O’Neill, Karen McConnell; ISD Scotland: Michael Fleming, Lynsey Waugh, Kirsten Monteath; NHS Wales IS: Russell Brown, Gareth Jones.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotlands Mountains: Key Issues for Their Future Management
    Scotland’s Mountains: Key Issues for their Future Management Martin F. Price, Benjamin J. Dixon, Charles R. Warren and Andrew R. Macpherson This report should be cited as follows: Price, Martin F., Dixon, Benjamin J., Warren, Charles R. & Macpherson Andrew R. (2002). Scotland’s Mountains: Key Issues for their Future Management. Scottish Natural Heritage, Battleby. ISSN 1350-3111 This report or any part of it should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage and M.F. Price which will not be unreasonably withheld. Scotland’s Mountains: Key Issues for their Future Management Foreword As a contribution to the International Year of Mountains (IYM), 2002, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) is pleased to publish this overview of the conservation and management needs of Scotland’s mountain areas. This is a detailed account of many activities undertaken under the auspices of the IYM. The report is distinctive in at least two regards. First, it is based to a large extent on interviews with specialists, advisors, policy makers, politicians and many others; this provides a freshness and sharpness to the content of the report. Second, it comes from external, academic sources; the authors are based at the Centre for Mountain Studies at Perth College (an academic partner of the UHI Millennium Institute), Imperial College, and at the Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews. For the first time in Scotland, we have a comprehensive analysis of information and experience across mountain land use, conservation and the local economy, notably from a sustainable stance. Indeed, the consideration of sustainable mountain development issues provides a clear analysis of integrated approaches to caring for mountain areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 4 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy August 2015 Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level Aslan Khuseinovich Abashidze1 Alexandr Mikhailovich Solntsev2 Alexandra Evgenyevna Koneva3 Denis Andreevich Gugunskiy4 Natalya Anatolyevna Grigorieva5 1 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 2 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 3 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 4 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 5 Department of History of Russia, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s4p289 Abstract In 2013 the Russian Federation has become a State party to Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children's Rights of October 19, 1996 (Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996). At this moment given the social importance of the Convention there is a pressing need for its effective application in the territory of the Russian Federation. For this purpose it is necessary to develop comprehensive guidelines on the procedures for applying the provisions of the Convention by the Russian authorities at all levels. Due to the fact that the experience of implementing the 1996 Hague Convention in the Russian Federation is not so extensive, it is especially important to study the practice of application of the Convention in another Member States, particularly Germany, Great Britain and Finland, in order to reveal the most effective ways of its implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Embeddedness of UK Devolution Finance Within the Public Expenditure System
    Regional Studies, Vol. 39.4, pp. 495–518, June 2005 Embeddedness of UK Devolution Finance within the Public Expenditure System DAVID HEALD* and ALASDAIR MCLEOD† *Management School, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 4DT, UK. Email: [email protected] † formerly Centre for Regional Public Finance, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3QY, UK. Email: [email protected] (Received March 2004: in revised form February 2005) H D. and ML A. (2005) Embeddedness of UK devolution finance within the public expenditure system, Regional Studies 39, 495–518. Before devolved government was established in 1999 in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, it was expected that the financing system would become more transparent. In fact, greater transparency about process (i.e. the rules) has not yet been matched by transparency about the numerical operation of a key element in the system, namely the Barnett formula, which regulates the budget envelopes of the devolved administrations. This paper tracks the numerical implementation of the Barnett formula since devolution in order to deepen understanding of how devolution finance is embedded within the UK’s public expenditure planning system. Accordingly, data are provided showing the generation of formula consequences for Scotland in each of the UK Spending Reviews 2000, 2002 and 2004. This cannot yet be done for Wales or Northern Ireland because the necessary data are not in the public domain. Then, for all three devolved administrations, the paper chain-links their ‘Departmental Expenditure Limits’ from one Spending Review to the next. These changes are systematically analysed into six analytical categories developed for the purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Choices for Scotland the Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper
    Travel Choices for Scotland The Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty July 1998 published by The Stationery Office Travel Choices for Scotland Contents FOREWORD SUMMARY 1. SCOTLAND'S PRIORITIES 1.1. An Agenda for Change 1.2. Scotland's Parliament 1.3. Integration and Sustainability 2. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT TODAY 2.1. Scotland 2.2. Current Patterns 3. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT FUTURE 3.1. Scotland's People 3.2. No Easy Answers 3.3. Thinking Ahead Now 3.4. Our Vision 3.5. The Role of Government 3.6. Improving Transport Co-ordination 4. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT ACTION PLAN 4.1. An Integrated Programme 4.2. Improving Local Transport 4.3. Improving the Use of Road Space 4.4. Improving our Environment 4.5. Improving Education and Awareness 4.6. Improving Walking and Cycling Provision 4.7. Improving Buses 4.8. Improving Railways 4.9. Improving Integrated Public Transport 4.10. Improving Community Transport 4.11. Improving Domestic Air and Ferry Services 4.12. Improving Enforcement and Safety 4.13. Improving the Trunk Road Network 4.14. Improving Land Use Planning 4.15. Improving Interaction with other Policies 4.16. Improving Freight Transport 5. CONCLUSION 5.1. Measuring and Monitoring 5.2. Keeping in Touch ANNEX A: TRANSPORT RESPONSIBILITIES AFTER DEVOLUTION ANNEX B: ACTION IN SCOTLAND'S DIVERSE PLACES ANNEX C: CURRENT SCOTTISH TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS Travel Choices for Scotland The Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty July 1998 published by The Stationery Office Travel Choices for Scotland Foreword Transport is critical to our everyday lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Declining Hysterectomy Prevalence and the Estimated Impact on Uterine Cancer Incidence in Scotland T
    Cancer Epidemiology 59 (2019) 227–231 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cancer Epidemiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/canep Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland T Garazi Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzagaa, David H. Brewsterb, Sarah H. Wilda, ⁎ Vanitha N. Sivalingamc, a Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom b Scottish Cancer Registry, NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, United Kingdom c Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Aim: The prevalence of hysterectomy is decreasing worldwide. It is not clear whether changes in the population Endometrial at risk (women with intact uteruses) have contributed to an increased uterine cancer incidence. This study aims Womb to assess the effect of changing trends in hysterectomy prevalence on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland. Uterine Methods: The population of women aged ≥25 years with intact uteri was estimated using the estimated hys- Cancer terectomy prevalence in 1995 and the number of procedures performed in Scotland (1996–2015). Age-stan- Hysterectomy dardized uterine cancer incidence was estimated using uncorrected (total) or corrected (adjusted for hyster- ectomy prevalence) populations as denominators and the number of incident cancers as numerators. Annual percentage change in uterine cancer was estimated. Results: Hysterectomy prevalence fell from 13% to 10% between 1996–2000 and 2011–2015, with the most marked decline (from 20% to 6%) in the 50–54-year age group. After correction for hysterectomy prevalence, age-standardized incidence of uterine cancer increased by 20–22%.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Review of Goose Management Policy in Scotland REVISED VERSION OCTOBER 2010
    2010 Review of Goose Management Policy in Scotland REVISED VERSION OCTOBER 2010 2010 Review of Goose Management Policy in Scotland Authors Bob Crabtree,1 Liz Humphreys, 2 Andrew Moxey3 & Chris Wernham2 1 CJC Consulting, 45 Southmoor Road, Oxford, OX2 6RF ([email protected]) 2 BTO Scotland, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA ([email protected]) 3 Pareto Consulting, 29 Redford Avenue, Edinburgh, EH13 0BX ([email protected]) A report to the Scottish Government October 2010 ©British Trust for Ornithology BTO Scotland School of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Room 3A120/125, Cottrell Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 1 REVISED VERSION OCTOBER 2010 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ 17 ACRONYMS USED IN TEXT ................................................................................... 19 SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR GOOSE SPECIES AND POPULATIONS IN SCOTLAND ................................................................................................................................. 21 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 22 1.1 Background to current Scottish Goose Management Policy and Structure ...................... 22 1.2 Policy drivers and the need for review .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Undue Deference to Experts Syndrome?
    UNDUE DEFERENCE TO EXPERTS SYNDROME? Elaine E. Sutherland' INTRODUCTION Expert witnesses are a recognized part of the legal landscape and, indeed, providing expert evidence to courts has become something of a growth industry.2 Expert witnesses often make valuable contributions. Engineers give evidence of the unique nature of particular designs in patent cases. Accountants explain how the books might be kept in a business context. Forensic scientists speak to the methodology and probability of matching physical evidence, such as blood or hair samples found at a crime scene, to the accused. Expert witnesses play no less of a role in family-related cases. Psychiatrists explain what might drive one adult partner to kill the other when the killer has been the victim of domestic abuse at the hands of the deceased. Psychologists offer expertise in terms of what is likely to have positive or negative effects on a particular child in the context of custody disputes. Actuaries help the court to understand the value of various assets, like pensions, and how these valuations may be arrived at, in property disputes. Expert witnesses feature particularly prominently when "syndromes ' 3 come before the 1. LL.B., LL.M., Professor of Child and Family Law, School of Law, University of Stirling, Scotland, and Professor of Law, Lewis and Clark Law School, Portland, Oregon. I am indebted to Professor Emeritus J. Kenyon Mason, himself an expert witness of considerable standing, who gave so generously of his time to comment on an earlier draft of this article. In addition, my thanks go to Professor Fraser Davidson (in Scotland) and Associate Professor Joseph S.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Hazell and Paul Jervis
    Nuffield Trust Series No. 3 Robert Hazell and Paul Jervis Introduction by John Wyn Owen Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street London W1M 7RD The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy Brook House 2-16 Torrington Place London WC1E 7HN ISBN 1 902089 11 1 © Nuffield Trust 1998 The Constitution Unit 1998 Publications Committee Sir Derek Mitchell KCB, CVO Professor John Ledingham DM, FRCP Mr John Wyn Owen CB CONTENTS Page Summary of Key Points 12 Chapter One Introduction: Purpose and scope of this report 18 Chapter Two The relationship between health and healthcare 24 Better health or better healthcare? Variations in health status; reasons and policy implications Health inequalities in Scotland, Wales and England Mortality and morbidity rates in England, Scotland and Wales 1995 Chapter Three The Government's devolution proposals 31 Scotland and Wales Regional Government in England Strategic Authority for London Northern Ireland Chapter Four Health and healthcare policies: The scope for variation in Scotland and Wales 38 Governance arrangements for the health services Service specification and the organisation of service delivery The scope for greater variation Policy objectives for the NHS The funding of health Chapter Five Health policy and management processes: the Labour Government's agenda 49 The health White Papers and the public health Green Papers Replacing the Internal Market - The Scottish proposals Replacing the Internal Market - The Welsh Proposals Replacing the Internal Market - The English Proposals CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLANNING POLITY the RTPI Library Series
    THE PLANNING POLITY The RTPI Library Series Editors: Cliff Hague, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland Robin Boyle, Wayne State University, Michigan, USA Robert Upton, RTPI, London, England Published in conjunction with The Royal Town Planning Institute, this series of leading-edge texts looks at all aspects of spatial planning theory and practice from a comparative and international perspective. Planning in Postmodern Times Philip Allmendinger The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective Andreas Faludi and Bas Waterhout Planning for Crime Prevention Richard Schneider and Ted Kitchen The Planning Polity Mark Tewdwr-Jones Shadows of Power Jean Hillier Forthcoming: Sustainability, Development and Spatial Planning in Europe Vincent Nadin, Caroline Brown and Stefanie Dühr Planning and Place Identity Cliff Hague and Paul Jenkins Public Values and Private Interests Heather Campbell and Robert Marshall Urban Planning and Cultural Identity William J.V. Neill THE PLANNING POLITY Planning, Government and the Policy Process MARK TEWDWR-JONES [l Routledge ~ ~ Taylor & Francis Group LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2002 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2002 Mark Tewdwr-Jones Typeset in Akzidenz Grotesk by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution and Higher Education: Impact and Future Trends 43723 Uniuk Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page Ii
    43723 UniUK Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page i Research report Devolution and higher education: impact and future trends 43723 UniUK Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page ii Research reports This series of Research reports published by Universities UK will present the results of research we have commissioned or undertaken in support of our policy development function. The series aims to disseminate project results in an accessible form and there will normally be a discussion of policy options arising from the work. This report has been prepared for Universities UK by Alan Trench, the Law School, University of Edinburgh. The statistical annexe was produced by Nigel Brown and Brian Ramsden. Universities UK also acknowledges, with thanks, the valuable contributions of Jim Gallacher, Jim Gallagher, John Fitz and Bob Osborne to this project. The copyright for this publication is held by Universities UK. The material may be copied or reproduced provided that the source is acknowledged and the material, wholly or in part, is not used for commercial gain. Use of the material for commercial gain requires the prior written permission of Universities UK. 43723 UniUK Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page 1 Devolution and higher education: impact and Contents future trends 5 Preface 7 Summary of key messages Section 1 9 Introduction: devolution and the United Kingdom 1.1 9 The legal and administrative structure of devolution 1.2 11 Devolution and the structure of government in Whitehall and Westminster 1.3 13 The management of intergovernmental relations 1.4 14 Devolution
    [Show full text]