Disability in Scotland a Baseline Study
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of Child Deaths in the Four UK Countries
Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Report produced by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health CHR-UK Programme of Work at the MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, University College London Institute of Child Health Report prepared by Pia Hardelid, Research Associate in Statistics Nirupa Dattani, Senior Data Coordinator Jonathan Davey, Data Manager Ivana Pribramska, Information Officer Ruth Gilbert, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology Acknowledgements RCPCH Programme Board: Neena Modi, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Alan McMahon, *#!(ƫ ++.!ČƫJohn Thain, Jyotsna Vohra. We also acknowledge Laura Gibbon of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health for managing the subcontract for the study. Child Death Overview Working Group: Rachel Knowles (UCL Institute of Child Health), Alison Macfarlane (City University), Berit Müller-Pebody (Public Health England), Roger Parslow (University of Leeds), Sonia Saxena (Imperial College), Anjali Shah (University of Oxford), Peter Sidebotham (University of Warwick) and Charles Stiller (University of Oxford). Additional input given by: Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Anna Pearce, and a clinician panel for chronic disease codes: Andrew McArdle, Quen Mok, Katja Doerholt, and Mike Sharland. Staff contributing on behalf of the data providers: ONS: Sue Dewane, Lois Cook, Joanne Copsey, Ruth Edwards, Liam Beardsmore, Vera Ruddock, Joanne Evans, Tony Hitching; HSCIC: Susan Milner, Gareth Dunning, Nicola Bootland, Richard Webster, Xanthe Hannah, Stephen Cowley; NISRA: Naomi O’Neill, Karen McConnell; ISD Scotland: Michael Fleming, Lynsey Waugh, Kirsten Monteath; NHS Wales IS: Russell Brown, Gareth Jones. -
Scotlands Mountains: Key Issues for Their Future Management
Scotland’s Mountains: Key Issues for their Future Management Martin F. Price, Benjamin J. Dixon, Charles R. Warren and Andrew R. Macpherson This report should be cited as follows: Price, Martin F., Dixon, Benjamin J., Warren, Charles R. & Macpherson Andrew R. (2002). Scotland’s Mountains: Key Issues for their Future Management. Scottish Natural Heritage, Battleby. ISSN 1350-3111 This report or any part of it should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage and M.F. Price which will not be unreasonably withheld. Scotland’s Mountains: Key Issues for their Future Management Foreword As a contribution to the International Year of Mountains (IYM), 2002, Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) is pleased to publish this overview of the conservation and management needs of Scotland’s mountain areas. This is a detailed account of many activities undertaken under the auspices of the IYM. The report is distinctive in at least two regards. First, it is based to a large extent on interviews with specialists, advisors, policy makers, politicians and many others; this provides a freshness and sharpness to the content of the report. Second, it comes from external, academic sources; the authors are based at the Centre for Mountain Studies at Perth College (an academic partner of the UHI Millennium Institute), Imperial College, and at the Department of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews. For the first time in Scotland, we have a comprehensive analysis of information and experience across mountain land use, conservation and the local economy, notably from a sustainable stance. Indeed, the consideration of sustainable mountain development issues provides a clear analysis of integrated approaches to caring for mountain areas. -
Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level
ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 4 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy August 2015 Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level Aslan Khuseinovich Abashidze1 Alexandr Mikhailovich Solntsev2 Alexandra Evgenyevna Koneva3 Denis Andreevich Gugunskiy4 Natalya Anatolyevna Grigorieva5 1 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 2 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 3 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 4 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 5 Department of History of Russia, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s4p289 Abstract In 2013 the Russian Federation has become a State party to Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children's Rights of October 19, 1996 (Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996). At this moment given the social importance of the Convention there is a pressing need for its effective application in the territory of the Russian Federation. For this purpose it is necessary to develop comprehensive guidelines on the procedures for applying the provisions of the Convention by the Russian authorities at all levels. Due to the fact that the experience of implementing the 1996 Hague Convention in the Russian Federation is not so extensive, it is especially important to study the practice of application of the Convention in another Member States, particularly Germany, Great Britain and Finland, in order to reveal the most effective ways of its implementation. -
Embeddedness of UK Devolution Finance Within the Public Expenditure System
Regional Studies, Vol. 39.4, pp. 495–518, June 2005 Embeddedness of UK Devolution Finance within the Public Expenditure System DAVID HEALD* and ALASDAIR MCLEOD† *Management School, University of Sheffield, 9 Mappin Street, Sheffield S1 4DT, UK. Email: [email protected] † formerly Centre for Regional Public Finance, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3QY, UK. Email: [email protected] (Received March 2004: in revised form February 2005) H D. and ML A. (2005) Embeddedness of UK devolution finance within the public expenditure system, Regional Studies 39, 495–518. Before devolved government was established in 1999 in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, it was expected that the financing system would become more transparent. In fact, greater transparency about process (i.e. the rules) has not yet been matched by transparency about the numerical operation of a key element in the system, namely the Barnett formula, which regulates the budget envelopes of the devolved administrations. This paper tracks the numerical implementation of the Barnett formula since devolution in order to deepen understanding of how devolution finance is embedded within the UK’s public expenditure planning system. Accordingly, data are provided showing the generation of formula consequences for Scotland in each of the UK Spending Reviews 2000, 2002 and 2004. This cannot yet be done for Wales or Northern Ireland because the necessary data are not in the public domain. Then, for all three devolved administrations, the paper chain-links their ‘Departmental Expenditure Limits’ from one Spending Review to the next. These changes are systematically analysed into six analytical categories developed for the purpose. -
Travel Choices for Scotland the Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper
Travel Choices for Scotland The Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty July 1998 published by The Stationery Office Travel Choices for Scotland Contents FOREWORD SUMMARY 1. SCOTLAND'S PRIORITIES 1.1. An Agenda for Change 1.2. Scotland's Parliament 1.3. Integration and Sustainability 2. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT TODAY 2.1. Scotland 2.2. Current Patterns 3. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT FUTURE 3.1. Scotland's People 3.2. No Easy Answers 3.3. Thinking Ahead Now 3.4. Our Vision 3.5. The Role of Government 3.6. Improving Transport Co-ordination 4. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT ACTION PLAN 4.1. An Integrated Programme 4.2. Improving Local Transport 4.3. Improving the Use of Road Space 4.4. Improving our Environment 4.5. Improving Education and Awareness 4.6. Improving Walking and Cycling Provision 4.7. Improving Buses 4.8. Improving Railways 4.9. Improving Integrated Public Transport 4.10. Improving Community Transport 4.11. Improving Domestic Air and Ferry Services 4.12. Improving Enforcement and Safety 4.13. Improving the Trunk Road Network 4.14. Improving Land Use Planning 4.15. Improving Interaction with other Policies 4.16. Improving Freight Transport 5. CONCLUSION 5.1. Measuring and Monitoring 5.2. Keeping in Touch ANNEX A: TRANSPORT RESPONSIBILITIES AFTER DEVOLUTION ANNEX B: ACTION IN SCOTLAND'S DIVERSE PLACES ANNEX C: CURRENT SCOTTISH TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS Travel Choices for Scotland The Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty July 1998 published by The Stationery Office Travel Choices for Scotland Foreword Transport is critical to our everyday lives. -
Declining Hysterectomy Prevalence and the Estimated Impact on Uterine Cancer Incidence in Scotland T
Cancer Epidemiology 59 (2019) 227–231 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cancer Epidemiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/canep Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland T Garazi Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzagaa, David H. Brewsterb, Sarah H. Wilda, ⁎ Vanitha N. Sivalingamc, a Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom b Scottish Cancer Registry, NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, United Kingdom c Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Aim: The prevalence of hysterectomy is decreasing worldwide. It is not clear whether changes in the population Endometrial at risk (women with intact uteruses) have contributed to an increased uterine cancer incidence. This study aims Womb to assess the effect of changing trends in hysterectomy prevalence on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland. Uterine Methods: The population of women aged ≥25 years with intact uteri was estimated using the estimated hys- Cancer terectomy prevalence in 1995 and the number of procedures performed in Scotland (1996–2015). Age-stan- Hysterectomy dardized uterine cancer incidence was estimated using uncorrected (total) or corrected (adjusted for hyster- ectomy prevalence) populations as denominators and the number of incident cancers as numerators. Annual percentage change in uterine cancer was estimated. Results: Hysterectomy prevalence fell from 13% to 10% between 1996–2000 and 2011–2015, with the most marked decline (from 20% to 6%) in the 50–54-year age group. After correction for hysterectomy prevalence, age-standardized incidence of uterine cancer increased by 20–22%. -
2010 Review of Goose Management Policy in Scotland REVISED VERSION OCTOBER 2010
2010 Review of Goose Management Policy in Scotland REVISED VERSION OCTOBER 2010 2010 Review of Goose Management Policy in Scotland Authors Bob Crabtree,1 Liz Humphreys, 2 Andrew Moxey3 & Chris Wernham2 1 CJC Consulting, 45 Southmoor Road, Oxford, OX2 6RF ([email protected]) 2 BTO Scotland, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA ([email protected]) 3 Pareto Consulting, 29 Redford Avenue, Edinburgh, EH13 0BX ([email protected]) A report to the Scottish Government October 2010 ©British Trust for Ornithology BTO Scotland School of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Room 3A120/125, Cottrell Building, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 1 REVISED VERSION OCTOBER 2010 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ 17 ACRONYMS USED IN TEXT ................................................................................... 19 SCIENTIFIC NAMES FOR GOOSE SPECIES AND POPULATIONS IN SCOTLAND ................................................................................................................................. 21 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 22 1.1 Background to current Scottish Goose Management Policy and Structure ...................... 22 1.2 Policy drivers and the need for review ....................................................................................... -
Undue Deference to Experts Syndrome?
UNDUE DEFERENCE TO EXPERTS SYNDROME? Elaine E. Sutherland' INTRODUCTION Expert witnesses are a recognized part of the legal landscape and, indeed, providing expert evidence to courts has become something of a growth industry.2 Expert witnesses often make valuable contributions. Engineers give evidence of the unique nature of particular designs in patent cases. Accountants explain how the books might be kept in a business context. Forensic scientists speak to the methodology and probability of matching physical evidence, such as blood or hair samples found at a crime scene, to the accused. Expert witnesses play no less of a role in family-related cases. Psychiatrists explain what might drive one adult partner to kill the other when the killer has been the victim of domestic abuse at the hands of the deceased. Psychologists offer expertise in terms of what is likely to have positive or negative effects on a particular child in the context of custody disputes. Actuaries help the court to understand the value of various assets, like pensions, and how these valuations may be arrived at, in property disputes. Expert witnesses feature particularly prominently when "syndromes ' 3 come before the 1. LL.B., LL.M., Professor of Child and Family Law, School of Law, University of Stirling, Scotland, and Professor of Law, Lewis and Clark Law School, Portland, Oregon. I am indebted to Professor Emeritus J. Kenyon Mason, himself an expert witness of considerable standing, who gave so generously of his time to comment on an earlier draft of this article. In addition, my thanks go to Professor Fraser Davidson (in Scotland) and Associate Professor Joseph S. -
Robert Hazell and Paul Jervis
Nuffield Trust Series No. 3 Robert Hazell and Paul Jervis Introduction by John Wyn Owen Published by The Nuffield Trust 59 New Cavendish Street London W1M 7RD The Constitution Unit School of Public Policy Brook House 2-16 Torrington Place London WC1E 7HN ISBN 1 902089 11 1 © Nuffield Trust 1998 The Constitution Unit 1998 Publications Committee Sir Derek Mitchell KCB, CVO Professor John Ledingham DM, FRCP Mr John Wyn Owen CB CONTENTS Page Summary of Key Points 12 Chapter One Introduction: Purpose and scope of this report 18 Chapter Two The relationship between health and healthcare 24 Better health or better healthcare? Variations in health status; reasons and policy implications Health inequalities in Scotland, Wales and England Mortality and morbidity rates in England, Scotland and Wales 1995 Chapter Three The Government's devolution proposals 31 Scotland and Wales Regional Government in England Strategic Authority for London Northern Ireland Chapter Four Health and healthcare policies: The scope for variation in Scotland and Wales 38 Governance arrangements for the health services Service specification and the organisation of service delivery The scope for greater variation Policy objectives for the NHS The funding of health Chapter Five Health policy and management processes: the Labour Government's agenda 49 The health White Papers and the public health Green Papers Replacing the Internal Market - The Scottish proposals Replacing the Internal Market - The Welsh Proposals Replacing the Internal Market - The English Proposals CONTENTS -
THE PLANNING POLITY the RTPI Library Series
THE PLANNING POLITY The RTPI Library Series Editors: Cliff Hague, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland Robin Boyle, Wayne State University, Michigan, USA Robert Upton, RTPI, London, England Published in conjunction with The Royal Town Planning Institute, this series of leading-edge texts looks at all aspects of spatial planning theory and practice from a comparative and international perspective. Planning in Postmodern Times Philip Allmendinger The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective Andreas Faludi and Bas Waterhout Planning for Crime Prevention Richard Schneider and Ted Kitchen The Planning Polity Mark Tewdwr-Jones Shadows of Power Jean Hillier Forthcoming: Sustainability, Development and Spatial Planning in Europe Vincent Nadin, Caroline Brown and Stefanie Dühr Planning and Place Identity Cliff Hague and Paul Jenkins Public Values and Private Interests Heather Campbell and Robert Marshall Urban Planning and Cultural Identity William J.V. Neill THE PLANNING POLITY Planning, Government and the Policy Process MARK TEWDWR-JONES [l Routledge ~ ~ Taylor & Francis Group LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2002 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2002 Mark Tewdwr-Jones Typeset in Akzidenz Grotesk by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non -
Devolution and Higher Education: Impact and Future Trends 43723 Uniuk Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page Ii
43723 UniUK Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page i Research report Devolution and higher education: impact and future trends 43723 UniUK Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page ii Research reports This series of Research reports published by Universities UK will present the results of research we have commissioned or undertaken in support of our policy development function. The series aims to disseminate project results in an accessible form and there will normally be a discussion of policy options arising from the work. This report has been prepared for Universities UK by Alan Trench, the Law School, University of Edinburgh. The statistical annexe was produced by Nigel Brown and Brian Ramsden. Universities UK also acknowledges, with thanks, the valuable contributions of Jim Gallacher, Jim Gallagher, John Fitz and Bob Osborne to this project. The copyright for this publication is held by Universities UK. The material may be copied or reproduced provided that the source is acknowledged and the material, wholly or in part, is not used for commercial gain. Use of the material for commercial gain requires the prior written permission of Universities UK. 43723 UniUK Devolution 12/11/08 13:04 Page 1 Devolution and higher education: impact and Contents future trends 5 Preface 7 Summary of key messages Section 1 9 Introduction: devolution and the United Kingdom 1.1 9 The legal and administrative structure of devolution 1.2 11 Devolution and the structure of government in Whitehall and Westminster 1.3 13 The management of intergovernmental relations 1.4 14 Devolution