Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of Child Deaths in the Four UK Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of Child Deaths in the Four UK Countries Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Report produced by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health CHR-UK Programme of Work at the MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, University College London Institute of Child Health Report prepared by Pia Hardelid, Research Associate in Statistics Nirupa Dattani, Senior Data Coordinator Jonathan Davey, Data Manager Ivana Pribramska, Information Officer Ruth Gilbert, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology Acknowledgements RCPCH Programme Board: Neena Modi, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Alan McMahon, *#!(ƫ ++.!ČƫJohn Thain, Jyotsna Vohra. We also acknowledge Laura Gibbon of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health for managing the subcontract for the study. Child Death Overview Working Group: Rachel Knowles (UCL Institute of Child Health), Alison Macfarlane (City University), Berit Müller-Pebody (Public Health England), Roger Parslow (University of Leeds), Sonia Saxena (Imperial College), Anjali Shah (University of Oxford), Peter Sidebotham (University of Warwick) and Charles Stiller (University of Oxford). Additional input given by: Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Anna Pearce, and a clinician panel for chronic disease codes: Andrew McArdle, Quen Mok, Katja Doerholt, and Mike Sharland. Staff contributing on behalf of the data providers: ONS: Sue Dewane, Lois Cook, Joanne Copsey, Ruth Edwards, Liam Beardsmore, Vera Ruddock, Joanne Evans, Tony Hitching; HSCIC: Susan Milner, Gareth Dunning, Nicola Bootland, Richard Webster, Xanthe Hannah, Stephen Cowley; NISRA: Naomi O’Neill, Karen McConnell; ISD Scotland: Michael Fleming, Lynsey Waugh, Kirsten Monteath; NHS Wales IS: Russell Brown, Gareth Jones. The study benefitted from infrastructure and academic support at the MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health and the Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research - London. CHR-UK was commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) on behalf of NHS England, NHS Wales, the Health and Social care division of the Scottish government, The Northern Ireland Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS) the States of Jersey, Guernsey, and the Isle of Man. iii Foreword I have been privileged to Chair the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health programme, Child Health Reviews - UK. The Programme has been innovative and bold, involving the work of an academic group in Module A, presented here, and contributions from paediatrician members of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health throughout the four countries of the UK in Module B, presented in an accompanying report. The aims of Module A were to examine the utility of existing datasets, the value of analyses based on linkages between death certificates and a child’s whole history of hospitalisations and birth registration, to describe variation between UK countries and over time in children’s mortality rates, and to build a picture of the underlying causes of death and accompanying co-morbidities. The Module A team at University College London found that all-cause child mortality has declined in all age groups and UK countries since 1980. Injury is the most frequent underlying cause of death, accounting for around a third to just under a half of deaths in children aged one to 18 years. England appears to have had consistently lower death rates from injury than the other UK countries and this disparity has widened since 1980 for children aged 10 to 18 years. They estimate that 52 fewer deaths among children in this age group would be likely each year if all UK countries had the same mortality rate due to injury as England. Despite a decline in child mortality due to unintentional injuries, there has been no decline in deaths due to self-harm, assault or other undetermined intentional injuries in 10 to 18 year olds in any UK country. These findings require careful consideration by policy makers. The University College London team identify the strengths and limitations of their approach, and suggest ways to improve access to data collections in the future. UK countries differ in data availability, the processes and time required, and the costs of accessing data. These differences limit cross-country UK comparisons that could inform policy and practice. The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health has pioneered the use of high quality extractions from patient management systems and electronic records in the National Neonatal Audit Programme, thus avoiding the burden of duplicate data collection by clinical and administrative teams, and reducing the costs and complexity of data associated with the use of data collections. Together with Child Health Reviews - UK, these programmes by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health have advanced the use of electronic data to inform and advance children’s healthcare, with the ultimate aim of improving their life-long health and wellbeing. Professor Neena Modi Vice-President, Science and Research, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health iv Contents List of figures and List of tables 4 List of abbreviations 7 Age group definitions 7 Executive summary 8 1 Purpose of the report 12 1.1 Background to the report 12 1.2 Informing policy 12 1.3 How useful are routine data about children who die? 12 1.4 Overview of the report 13 2 Data sources 15 2.1 Background and rationale 15 2.2 Methods 15 2.3 Results 16 2.3.1 Datasets 16 2.3.2 Obtaining the data 16 2.3.3 Data preparation 18 2.4 Discussion 19 2.4.1 Obtaining the data 19 2.4.2 Data preparation 20 2.4.3 Analyses 20 3 Variation in rates of child death due to injury based on the underlying cause recorded on death certificates (1980-2010) 21 3.1 Background and rationale 21 3.2 Methods 22 3.3 Results 23 3.3.1 Trends in all underlying causes of death 23 3.3.2 Trends in injury deaths 25 3.3.3 Type of injury accounting for the decline 27 3.4 Discussion 29 4 Multiple morbidity recorded on children’s death certificates (2006-2010) 30 4.1 Background and rationale 30 4.2 Methods 30 4.3 Results 31 4.4 Discussion 36 5 Variation in child mortality by birth weight and maternal age (1993-2010) 37 5.1 Background and rationale 37 5.2 Methods 38 5.2.1 Birth cohort linked to death records 38 5.2.2 Denominator data 38 5.2.3 Statistical analyses 39 5.3 Results 39 5.3.1 Birth weight 40 5.3.2 Maternal age 42 1 5.3.3 Disparities in child mortality associated with maternal age after accounting for low birth weight 44 5.4 Discussion 49 6 Children who died with a chronic condition (2001-2010) 51 6.1 Background 51 6.2 Methods 52 6.2.1 Study population 52 6.2.2 Identifying children with chronic conditions 53 6.2.3 Injury deaths 54 6.3 Results 54 6.3.1 Previous hospital admission in children who died 54 6.3.2 The value of adding more data from children’s linked hospital trajectory 56 6.3.3 Proportion of children affected by a chronic condition 62 6.3.4 Trends over time in the proportion of children who died with a chronic condition 65 6.3.5 Chronic conditions in children who died of injury 69 6.4 Discussion 71 6.4.1 Proportion of children who died with a chronic condition 71 6.4.2 Injuries as a cause of death in children who died with chronic conditions 71 6.4.3 Maximising the added value of linked data from children’s hospital trajectory 72 7 Place of death in children (2001-2010) 73 7.1 Background 73 7.2 Methods 74 7.2.1 Study population 74 7.2.2 Defining place of death 74 7.3 Results 75 7.3.1 Distribution of deaths in and out of hospital according to admission status 75 7.3.2 Deaths in hospital and admission status 77 7.3.3 Deaths in hospital but not during admission 78 7.3.4 Deaths out of hospital 80 7.3.5 Trends over time in the proportion of deaths occurring in and out of hospital 82 7.4 Discussion 86 8 Future directions 87 References 90 Appendix 3.1 Data cleaning and exclusions for death certificate data for deaths that occurred in 1980 and 2010 in children aged one to 18 years 97 Appendix 3.2A Injury mortality rates, rate ratios and rate differences (per 100,000 population) comparing Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland with England, by age group and time period: boys 98 Appendix 3.2B Injury mortality rates, rate ratios and rate differences (per 100,000 population) comparing Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland with England, by age group and time period: girls 99 Appendix 3.3 Information on death registration data used in analyses 100 2 Appendix 3.4 Information on codes used for ICD-9 and ICD-10 chapter groupings based on death certificate data 101 Appendix 3.5 Information on sources for population denominator estimates by country 102 Appendix 3.6A Transport accident mortality rates (per 100,000 population) with 95% CI by country, age group and time period 103 Appendix 3.6B Mortality rates for other unintentional injuries (not transport accidents; per 100,000 population) with 95% CI by country, age group and time period 104 Appendix 3.6C Mortality rates for intentional injuries (per 100,000 population) with 95% CI by country, age group and time period 105 Appendix 4.1 Medical certificate of cause of death 106 Appendix 4.2 ICD-10 code lists for acute respiratory conditions 107 Appendix 5.1 Information on birth registrations linked to death certificate and live birth denominator data for singleton live births, England and Wales, and Scotland 108 Appendix 5.2 Details of data cleaning and statistical methods
Recommended publications
  • Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 4 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy August 2015 Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level Aslan Khuseinovich Abashidze1 Alexandr Mikhailovich Solntsev2 Alexandra Evgenyevna Koneva3 Denis Andreevich Gugunskiy4 Natalya Anatolyevna Grigorieva5 1 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 2 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 3 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 4 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 5 Department of History of Russia, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s4p289 Abstract In 2013 the Russian Federation has become a State party to Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children's Rights of October 19, 1996 (Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996). At this moment given the social importance of the Convention there is a pressing need for its effective application in the territory of the Russian Federation. For this purpose it is necessary to develop comprehensive guidelines on the procedures for applying the provisions of the Convention by the Russian authorities at all levels. Due to the fact that the experience of implementing the 1996 Hague Convention in the Russian Federation is not so extensive, it is especially important to study the practice of application of the Convention in another Member States, particularly Germany, Great Britain and Finland, in order to reveal the most effective ways of its implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability in Scotland a Baseline Study
    Disability Rights Commission Disability in Scotland A Baseline Study Sheila Riddell and Pauline Banks A report prepared for the Disability Rights Commission Scotland Office by the Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research, University of Glasgow, June 2001 The Disability Rights Commission The Disability Rights Commission (DRC) is an independent body, established by Act of Parliament to eliminate the discrimination faced by disabled people and promote equality of opportunity. When disabled people participate - as citizens, customers and employees - everyone benefits. So we have set ourselves the goal of “a society where all disabled people can participate fully as equal citizens”. We work with disabled people and their organisations, the business community, Government and public sector agencies to achieve practical solutions that are effective for employers, service providers and disabled people alike. There are roughly 8.5 million disabled people in Britain - one in seven of the population. This covers people with epilepsy, cancer, schizophrenia, Down’s syndrome and many other types of impairment. Under the Disability Discrimination Act (1995), many legal rights and obligations affecting disabled people’s access to services and employment are already in force. Others become law in 2004. Many people are still not aware that they have many new rights. And employers and service providers are often unsure how to implement “best practice” to make it easier for disabled people to use their services or gain employment. The DRC has offices in England, Scotland and Wales. We are here to assist and advise through our Helpline, Disability Conciliation Service, the Casework, Legal, and Practice Development Teams, publications, research and policy work.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Choices for Scotland the Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper
    Travel Choices for Scotland The Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty July 1998 published by The Stationery Office Travel Choices for Scotland Contents FOREWORD SUMMARY 1. SCOTLAND'S PRIORITIES 1.1. An Agenda for Change 1.2. Scotland's Parliament 1.3. Integration and Sustainability 2. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT TODAY 2.1. Scotland 2.2. Current Patterns 3. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT FUTURE 3.1. Scotland's People 3.2. No Easy Answers 3.3. Thinking Ahead Now 3.4. Our Vision 3.5. The Role of Government 3.6. Improving Transport Co-ordination 4. SCOTLAND'S TRANSPORT ACTION PLAN 4.1. An Integrated Programme 4.2. Improving Local Transport 4.3. Improving the Use of Road Space 4.4. Improving our Environment 4.5. Improving Education and Awareness 4.6. Improving Walking and Cycling Provision 4.7. Improving Buses 4.8. Improving Railways 4.9. Improving Integrated Public Transport 4.10. Improving Community Transport 4.11. Improving Domestic Air and Ferry Services 4.12. Improving Enforcement and Safety 4.13. Improving the Trunk Road Network 4.14. Improving Land Use Planning 4.15. Improving Interaction with other Policies 4.16. Improving Freight Transport 5. CONCLUSION 5.1. Measuring and Monitoring 5.2. Keeping in Touch ANNEX A: TRANSPORT RESPONSIBILITIES AFTER DEVOLUTION ANNEX B: ACTION IN SCOTLAND'S DIVERSE PLACES ANNEX C: CURRENT SCOTTISH TRANSPORT MOVEMENTS Travel Choices for Scotland The Scottish Integrated Transport White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Scotland by Command of Her Majesty July 1998 published by The Stationery Office Travel Choices for Scotland Foreword Transport is critical to our everyday lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Declining Hysterectomy Prevalence and the Estimated Impact on Uterine Cancer Incidence in Scotland T
    Cancer Epidemiology 59 (2019) 227–231 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Cancer Epidemiology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/canep Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland T Garazi Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzagaa, David H. Brewsterb, Sarah H. Wilda, ⁎ Vanitha N. Sivalingamc, a Usher Institute for Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom b Scottish Cancer Registry, NHS National Services Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh EH12 9EB, United Kingdom c Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Aim: The prevalence of hysterectomy is decreasing worldwide. It is not clear whether changes in the population Endometrial at risk (women with intact uteruses) have contributed to an increased uterine cancer incidence. This study aims Womb to assess the effect of changing trends in hysterectomy prevalence on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland. Uterine Methods: The population of women aged ≥25 years with intact uteri was estimated using the estimated hys- Cancer terectomy prevalence in 1995 and the number of procedures performed in Scotland (1996–2015). Age-stan- Hysterectomy dardized uterine cancer incidence was estimated using uncorrected (total) or corrected (adjusted for hyster- ectomy prevalence) populations as denominators and the number of incident cancers as numerators. Annual percentage change in uterine cancer was estimated. Results: Hysterectomy prevalence fell from 13% to 10% between 1996–2000 and 2011–2015, with the most marked decline (from 20% to 6%) in the 50–54-year age group. After correction for hysterectomy prevalence, age-standardized incidence of uterine cancer increased by 20–22%.
    [Show full text]
  • Undue Deference to Experts Syndrome?
    UNDUE DEFERENCE TO EXPERTS SYNDROME? Elaine E. Sutherland' INTRODUCTION Expert witnesses are a recognized part of the legal landscape and, indeed, providing expert evidence to courts has become something of a growth industry.2 Expert witnesses often make valuable contributions. Engineers give evidence of the unique nature of particular designs in patent cases. Accountants explain how the books might be kept in a business context. Forensic scientists speak to the methodology and probability of matching physical evidence, such as blood or hair samples found at a crime scene, to the accused. Expert witnesses play no less of a role in family-related cases. Psychiatrists explain what might drive one adult partner to kill the other when the killer has been the victim of domestic abuse at the hands of the deceased. Psychologists offer expertise in terms of what is likely to have positive or negative effects on a particular child in the context of custody disputes. Actuaries help the court to understand the value of various assets, like pensions, and how these valuations may be arrived at, in property disputes. Expert witnesses feature particularly prominently when "syndromes ' 3 come before the 1. LL.B., LL.M., Professor of Child and Family Law, School of Law, University of Stirling, Scotland, and Professor of Law, Lewis and Clark Law School, Portland, Oregon. I am indebted to Professor Emeritus J. Kenyon Mason, himself an expert witness of considerable standing, who gave so generously of his time to comment on an earlier draft of this article. In addition, my thanks go to Professor Fraser Davidson (in Scotland) and Associate Professor Joseph S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PLANNING POLITY the RTPI Library Series
    THE PLANNING POLITY The RTPI Library Series Editors: Cliff Hague, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland Robin Boyle, Wayne State University, Michigan, USA Robert Upton, RTPI, London, England Published in conjunction with The Royal Town Planning Institute, this series of leading-edge texts looks at all aspects of spatial planning theory and practice from a comparative and international perspective. Planning in Postmodern Times Philip Allmendinger The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective Andreas Faludi and Bas Waterhout Planning for Crime Prevention Richard Schneider and Ted Kitchen The Planning Polity Mark Tewdwr-Jones Shadows of Power Jean Hillier Forthcoming: Sustainability, Development and Spatial Planning in Europe Vincent Nadin, Caroline Brown and Stefanie Dühr Planning and Place Identity Cliff Hague and Paul Jenkins Public Values and Private Interests Heather Campbell and Robert Marshall Urban Planning and Cultural Identity William J.V. Neill THE PLANNING POLITY Planning, Government and the Policy Process MARK TEWDWR-JONES [l Routledge ~ ~ Taylor & Francis Group LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2002 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2002 Mark Tewdwr-Jones Typeset in Akzidenz Grotesk by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non
    [Show full text]