THE PLANNING POLITY the RTPI Library Series

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE PLANNING POLITY the RTPI Library Series THE PLANNING POLITY The RTPI Library Series Editors: Cliff Hague, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland Robin Boyle, Wayne State University, Michigan, USA Robert Upton, RTPI, London, England Published in conjunction with The Royal Town Planning Institute, this series of leading-edge texts looks at all aspects of spatial planning theory and practice from a comparative and international perspective. Planning in Postmodern Times Philip Allmendinger The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective Andreas Faludi and Bas Waterhout Planning for Crime Prevention Richard Schneider and Ted Kitchen The Planning Polity Mark Tewdwr-Jones Shadows of Power Jean Hillier Forthcoming: Sustainability, Development and Spatial Planning in Europe Vincent Nadin, Caroline Brown and Stefanie Dühr Planning and Place Identity Cliff Hague and Paul Jenkins Public Values and Private Interests Heather Campbell and Robert Marshall Urban Planning and Cultural Identity William J.V. Neill THE PLANNING POLITY Planning, Government and the Policy Process MARK TEWDWR-JONES [l Routledge ~ ~ Taylor & Francis Group LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2002 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2002 Mark Tewdwr-Jones Typeset in Akzidenz Grotesk by Wearset Ltd, Boldon, Tyne and Wear The Open Access version of this book, available at www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN 13: 978-0-415-28654-1 (hbk) ISBN 13: 978-0-415-28655-8 (pbk) CONTENTS List of Tables vii Preface ix Acknowledgements xv List of Abbreviations xix 01 Introduction 1 PART 1: POLITICAL IDEOLOGY, POLICY RELATIONS AND THE PLANNING PROCESS 23 02 A Theoretical Context of Planning Policy 25 03 The Politics of Planning Policy: The Major Era 40 04 The Politics of Planning Policy: The Blair Era 53 05 National, Regional and Local Planning Policy Relationships 83 PART 2: PLANNING POLICY CONFLICTS IN GOVERNMENT RELATIONS 107 06 National Consistency in the Planning Policy Process 109 07 Regional Certainty and Compatibility in the Planning Policy Process 122 08 Local Discretion in the Planning Policy Process 151 09 National Agendas and Planning Policy Variation: Wales vs. England 185 PART 3: DEVOLUTION, DISTINCTIVENESS AND PLANNING POLICY DEVELOPMENT 231 10 National Planning Policy and Devolution in Wales After 1999 233 11 Devolution and Planning Policy Development in Scotland After 1999 247 12 Planning Policy Within New Forms of Governance 265 13 Conclusions 283 References 297 Index 323 TABLES 1.1 Academic critiques of British planning 2 1.2 The principal state agencies of British planning; the planning polity 4 2.1 The micro-political and macro-political theoretical contexts discussed within the book 26 5.1 National planning policy in England 92 5.2 Regional planning policy in England 93 5.3 National planning policy in Scotland 94 5.4 National planning policy in Wales 95 6.1 Satisfaction with national planning policy 111 6.2 Adequacy of national planning policy 112 6.3 Perceptions towards the priorities of national planning policy 113 6.4 The scope for further national planning policy 114 6.5 The significance of central government intervention in local planning 115 6.6 The extent of central government intervention in local planning 116 6.7 Perceptions of the plan-led system for local planning 117 6.8 Detailed perceptions of the plan-led system 118 6.9 Adequacy of central government’s explanation of the plan-led system 119 6.10 Perceptions of policy priority in the event of conflict between national and local planning policies 120 7.1 Local plan procedure checklist used by government regional offices 129 7.2 The adequacy of existing regional planning arrangements 139 7.3 The effectiveness of existing regional planning guidance 140 7.4 Optimism expressed towards new devolved institutions in strengthening regional policy formulation 142 7.5 Perceptions towards the scope for increased accountability of regional economic development institutions 144 7.6 The scope for further fragmentation of the national approach to strategic policy formulation 146 8.1 Timing of West Dorset’s local plan research 158 viii Tables 8.2 Categorisation of comments and objections from central government to West Dorset on local plan 159 8.3 Total number of objections made by central government to West Dorset’s plan 161 8.4 Central government’s objections to West Dorset’s plan by category 162 9.1 Design comparison, England and Wales 206 9.2 Transport and Infrastructure comparison, England and Wales 207 9.3 Housing comparison, England and Wales 209 9.4 Conservation of the Natural and Built Environment comparison, England and Wales 211 9.5 The Coast comparison, England and Wales 212 9.6 Green Belts comparison, England and Wales 213 9.7 Economic Development comparison, England and Wales 215 9.8 Control of Outdoor Advertisements comparison, England and Wales 217 9.9 Tourism, Sport and Recreation comparison, England and Wales 218 9.10 Energy comparison, England and Wales 220 9.11 Waste Treatment and Disposal comparison, England and Wales 220 9.12 Land Reclamation, Unstable Land, Contaminated Land and Flood Risk comparison, England and Wales 221 9.13 Pollution comparison, England and Wales 223 9.14 National policy statements identified within Wales but not England 226 10.1 Possible issues for the Wales Spatial Plan 242 PREFACE As a student of planning in the mid- to late 1980s, I was fascinated by the way in which the political process shaped, manipulated and implemented spatial planning decisions. Within education, I had been taught that town and country planning was predominantly a scientific process, utilising technical expertise, professional values and rational judgement. I had long felt uneasy about these parameters. I knew that public sector planning occurred through the democratic process, and that there was a partnership between professional planners and elected political representa- tives. I also acknowledged that the public had reasonable rights of consultation within both plan-making and development control. But I was nevertheless intrigued, possibly even bewildered, by the extent to which politics impinged on planners’ work, and how planning affected the attitudes, behaviour and actions of political actors. As far as I could identify from my own observations of the town and country planning process, assisted by deep reading of the theoretical contributions that existed at this time, planning was actually in the crucible of a contested arena that involved the creation of winners and losers. On the one hand, planning seeks to involve and attract developers and prop- erty companies to specific areas of land that are suitable for development or rede- velopment. On the other hand, planning is also answerable to local people and seeks to involve the public in the policy- and decision-making aspects that form part of the determination, scrutiny and analytical processes within government. It did not seem feasible to me that these were mutually compatible exercises. Profes- sional planners, advising political actors of the ‘most appropriate’ form of action, would inevitably have to make judgements about right or wrong, environmental pro- tection and development, public versus private interests, the interests of local and strategic concerns, and so on. Although Patsy Healey is right in remarking that it is not helpful at all to look at the world in terms of dualisms, my educational – and later professional practice – experience only consolidated this perspective. Plan- ning, for me, equated to political choice, and it was not only within local environ- ments that these decisions had to be framed and resolved. I learned quickly that while a planner may resolve a contested matter locally, there was the added com- plication of taking on board the political preferences and planning stances of other tiers of government. Planning was therefore not only attempting to reconcile so many varying interests horizontally between local actors arguing over specific sites or policy proposals, it was also attempting to reconcile local versus regional and x Preface national interests. Associated with these two axes, there was a third dilemma: how to deliver varying economic, social and environmental sectoral (and ultimately polit- ical) objectives. Could the town and country planning system, as it had evolved in the UK in the decades after the post-war period, really be expected to deliver everything it was being asked to do? Planners were increasingly being told from varying quar- ters to deliver or facilitate economic growth, environmental protection, social and community justice, sustainable development, private sector developments, public consultation and participation, local political objectives, to make strategic and regional contributions, and to reflect national (and even European) interests. And planners were being encouraged to act as both judge and jury, encouraging the public to get involved locally in the planning system but reminded that they had a duty to approve development schemes where they could; the final decision on the small matter of in which direction to plump for, ultimately, would
Recommended publications
  • Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of Child Deaths in the Four UK Countries
    Child Health Reviews - UK Clinical Outcome Review Programme Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Overview of child deaths in the four UK countries Report September 2013 Report produced by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health CHR-UK Programme of Work at the MRC Centre of Epidemiology for Child Health, University College London Institute of Child Health Report prepared by Pia Hardelid, Research Associate in Statistics Nirupa Dattani, Senior Data Coordinator Jonathan Davey, Data Manager Ivana Pribramska, Information Officer Ruth Gilbert, Professor of Clinical Epidemiology Acknowledgements RCPCH Programme Board: Neena Modi, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Alan McMahon, *#!(ƫ ++.!ČƫJohn Thain, Jyotsna Vohra. We also acknowledge Laura Gibbon of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health for managing the subcontract for the study. Child Death Overview Working Group: Rachel Knowles (UCL Institute of Child Health), Alison Macfarlane (City University), Berit Müller-Pebody (Public Health England), Roger Parslow (University of Leeds), Sonia Saxena (Imperial College), Anjali Shah (University of Oxford), Peter Sidebotham (University of Warwick) and Charles Stiller (University of Oxford). Additional input given by: Arturo Gonzalez-Izquierdo, Anna Pearce, and a clinician panel for chronic disease codes: Andrew McArdle, Quen Mok, Katja Doerholt, and Mike Sharland. Staff contributing on behalf of the data providers: ONS: Sue Dewane, Lois Cook, Joanne Copsey, Ruth Edwards, Liam Beardsmore, Vera Ruddock, Joanne Evans, Tony Hitching; HSCIC: Susan Milner, Gareth Dunning, Nicola Bootland, Richard Webster, Xanthe Hannah, Stephen Cowley; NISRA: Naomi O’Neill, Karen McConnell; ISD Scotland: Michael Fleming, Lynsey Waugh, Kirsten Monteath; NHS Wales IS: Russell Brown, Gareth Jones.
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Gus Macdonald
    GCU GCU London Cowcaddens Road, 40 Fashion Street, Glasgow G4 0BA, London E1 6PX, Scotland, United Kingdom United Kingdom T: +44 (0)141 331 3000 T: +44 (0)203 369 3000 Lord Gus Macdonald F: +44 (0)141 331 3005 of Tradeston www.gcu.ac.uk www.gculondon.ac.uk University Chancellor 2007 - 2012 Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number SC021474. Designed and printed by Print Design Services, Glasgow Caledonian University. © Glasgow Caledonian University 2012. Introduction from the Principal and Vice-Chancellor For over six hundred years Chancellors of 25,000 students he graduated during his time Scottish universities have nourished and as Chancellor and in recognising the support of nurtured our universities, protected their their families. autonomy and intellectual integrity and conferred degrees on students. Whilst primarily ceremonial Lord Macdonald is a keen and steadfast in present times, the Chancellor’s role is an supporter of our Caledonian Club which is extremely important one. designed to raise the aspirations of pupils aged three to 18 years. During his tenure, the Throughout his time as Chancellor, Lord Caledonian Club has worked with over 5,300 Macdonald of Tradeston has proven an children and 2,000 families in Glasgow and is outstanding ambassador for the University, with now also serving the local community of Tower his wife, Lady Macdonald. He has been truly Hamlets in London where our new postgraduate supportive of the University’s social mission and campus was officially launched by HRH The our commitment to providing opportunities in Princess Royal in November 2011. higher education for all, and most especially for those from challenging or difficult backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level
    ISSN 2039-2117 (online) Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol 6 No 4 S4 ISSN 2039-9340 (print) MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy August 2015 Current Issues of Application of Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996 on National Level Aslan Khuseinovich Abashidze1 Alexandr Mikhailovich Solntsev2 Alexandra Evgenyevna Koneva3 Denis Andreevich Gugunskiy4 Natalya Anatolyevna Grigorieva5 1 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 2 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 3 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 4 Department of International Law, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation 5 Department of History of Russia, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation Doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s4p289 Abstract In 2013 the Russian Federation has become a State party to Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Co-operation in respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children's Rights of October 19, 1996 (Hague Child Protection Convention of 1996). At this moment given the social importance of the Convention there is a pressing need for its effective application in the territory of the Russian Federation. For this purpose it is necessary to develop comprehensive guidelines on the procedures for applying the provisions of the Convention by the Russian authorities at all levels. Due to the fact that the experience of implementing the 1996 Hague Convention in the Russian Federation is not so extensive, it is especially important to study the practice of application of the Convention in another Member States, particularly Germany, Great Britain and Finland, in order to reveal the most effective ways of its implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • PSA Awards 2000
    Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom 50TH ANNIVERSARY Welcome In 1951, its first complete year, the PSA had 100 members. Today we have 800 full members and 300 graduate members and numbers continue to rise. The first annual conference was held at the LSE in 1950 and 50 members attended. The 50th Anniversary Conference was also held at the LSE but this time 720 members attended. By all conventional indicators, the Association has arrived at Patrick Dunleavy, Paul Kelly and Mick Moran. Finally, we introduced its 50th Birthday in good condition. Indeed, at the other side a major addition to the services for members; the new, expanded of an era in which the Social Science Research Council became interactive PSA web site. Members can find information about all the Economic and Social Research Council on ministerial Association’s events; update their personal information on the whim, we should be grateful we survived. Association’s member database; access electronic versions of PSA News and Political Studies. The PSA exists to represent and promote the study of politics throughout higher education. To celebrate our healthy survival It is my pleasant duty to thank the Awards jury, made up of in pursuing these aims, the PSA’s Executive Committee mounted past Presidents of the Association and past editors of Political ‘Project 2000’. It has four objectives. Studies, who decided on their list with a startling lack of discord – a tribute to the winners. Also, I thank members of the Project 2000 Committee – Jack Arthurs, John Benyon, Charlie Jeffery and ■ To raise the profile and standing of the PSA Jon Tonge – for their hard work.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus College Cambridge
    Rustat Conferences - Jesus College Cambridge Infrastructure & the Future of Society Energy, Cities and Water Proceedings of the third Rustat Conference Jesus College, Cambridge 10 June 2010 Dr Ruchi Choudhary Lecturer in Engineering University of Cambridge For more information please contact: Rustat Conferences Jesus College Cambridge CB5 8BL Tel 01223 328316 [email protected] www.rustat.org Infrastructure & the Future of Society - Rustat Conference - Jesus College, Cambridge 1 Infrastructure and the Future of Society Energy, Cities & Water Rustat Conference - Jesus College, Cambridge 10 June, 2010 Roundtable discussion at the Rustat Conference Rustat Conference registration in the Prioress’s Room, Jesus College, Cambridge Infrastructure & the Future of Society - Rustat Conference - Jesus College, Cambridge 2 Contents Infrastructure and the Future of Society - Conference Agenda 4 Rustat Conferences – Background and Overview 5 Acknowledgements 6 Infrastructure and the Future of Society – Conference Participants 7 Session I What are the Critical Infrastructure Challenges facing Society over the Next Half Century? 10 Session II Infrastructure for Energy Security – Nuclear, Low Carbon, and Renewables 12 Session III Infrastructure for Cities and the Built Environment of the Future 16 Session IV Financing the Infrastructure of the Future 20 Session V Infrastructure for the Secure Supply of Water 23 Appendix Participant Profiles 26 Infrastructure & the Future of Society - Rustat Conference - Jesus College, Cambridge 3 Infrastructure and the Future
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Committee on Business Appointments Twelfth Annual
    Advisory Committee on Business Appointments Twelfth Annual Report 2010-2011 0 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON BUSINESS APPOINTMENTS November 2011 TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT I enclose a copy of the twelfth Annual Report of the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments. The report covers the period of 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2011. This report covers the first full year of the new Committee. I have taken the opportunity to look closely at the working practices of the Committee and have introduced some key changes. The Committee meets regularly to ensure robust discussion on key issues and confirmation of consistency of approach. I have also looked at how the Committee might be more open and have agreed that in future the minutes of these meetings will be published. The Committee continues to consider ways to be increasingly open about its work, while at the same time recognising the need to protect the confidentiality of personal information it holds on applicants. The Committee welcomed the Government’s publication of the new Business Appointment Rules for Civil Servants in February 2011. We believe that the new Rules provide more clarity and will be more easily understood by applicants, departments and the public alike. While this report only covers the first two months of the operation of the new Rules, our secretariat has been visiting departments to advise on the application of the Rules; this is a precursor to our starting compliance assurance checks in the next financial year. The Committee considered a large number of applications from former ministers in this period, as is usual following a General Election.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact and Effectiveness of Ministerial Reshuffles
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The impact and effectiveness of ministerial reshuffles Second Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes and oral evidence Written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/pcrc Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 June 2013 HC 255 [Incorporating HC 707-i to vii, Session 2012-13] Published on 14 June 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee The Political and Constitutional Reform Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider political and constitutional reform. Current membership Mr Graham Allen MP (Labour, Nottingham North) (Chair) Mr Christopher Chope MP (Conservative, Christchurch) Paul Flynn (Labour, Newport West) Sheila Gilmore MP (Labour, Edinburgh East) Andrew Griffiths MP (Conservative, Burton) Fabian Hamilton MP, (Labour, Leeds North East) Simon Hart MP (Conservative, Camarthen West and South Pembrokeshire) Tristram Hunt MP (Labour, Stoke on Trent Central) Mrs Eleanor Laing MP (Conservative, Epping Forest) Mr Andrew Turner MP (Conservative, Isle of Wight) Stephen Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Bristol West) Powers The Committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in Temporary Standing Order (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee). These are available on the Internet via http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmstords.htm. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/pcrc.
    [Show full text]
  • “Tony Wants”: the First Blair Premiership in Historical Perspective Transcript
    “Tony Wants”: The First Blair Premiership in Historical Perspective Transcript Date: Wednesday, 7 November 2001 - 12:00AM Location: Staple Inn Hall Blair’s First Term Professor Peter Hennessy May I begin this evening with a few words about Professor Colin Matthew. I did not know Colin well ~ but I knew him well enough to appreciate how important he was to my profession. He had a capacity to inspire and to organise both on the page, within his university and through such learned bodies as the Royal Historical Society which was very special indeed. His judgement allied to his energy and generosity of spirit meant that Colin could ~ and did ~ make good things happen like few others. It is a great honour to be speaking in his memory this evening. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a lecture in two parts. Part one is written as if today was the10th September 2001. It will be the sort of presentation I would have given if Black Tuesday had not happened and the political press was still reflecting the running argument between sections of the Labour movement and the government about the precise mix of the still churning New Labour version of a mixed economy. No doubt the papers, too, would have been full of the latest twists and turns of the Tony/Gordon story ~ a political rivalry unmatched perhaps since the Gladstone/Disraeli era, (the period which Colin Matthew covered so wonderfully), the difference being that TB and GB are members of the same Cabinet. We would be intrigued, too, by the new configuration of the ever more tightly fused No.10 and Cabinet Office ~ the latest geographical expression of the Blair Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saltire Society Literary Awards, 1936-2015: a Cultural History
    The Saltire Society Literary Awards, 1936-2015: A Cultural History Stevie Marsden A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Publishing Studies University of Stirling 2016 2 Abstract This thesis presents a history of the Saltire Society Literary Awards and examines their status and role within Scotland’s literary and publishing culture. The Society was founded at a critical inter-war period during which Scottish writers, artists and cultural commentators were re-imagining Scotland’s political and cultural identity. The Society, therefore, was a product of this reformative era in Scotland’s modern history. The Society’s identity and position within this inter- and post-war reformation is reflected in the Literary Awards, which are a means by which the Society attempts to accomplish some of its constitutional aims. The purpose of this thesis is three-fold. Firstly, it has filled a conspicuous gap in modern Scottish cultural history by offering a historically accurate description of the founding of the Saltire Society in 1936 and the development of the Society’s Literary Awards up until 2015. Secondly, this thesis demonstrates how the Society’s Literary Awards function in relation to key critical discourses pertinent to contemporary book award culture, such as forms of capital, national identity and gender. Finally, this thesis proffers an in-depth analysis of book award judgment culture. Through an analysis of the linguistic and social interactions between Saltire Society Literary Award judges, this thesis is the first study of its kind which considers exactly how literary award judging panels facilitate the judgement process.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Parliament
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 6 March 2008 Session 3 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2008. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by RR Donnelley. CONTENTS Thursday 6 March 2008 Debates Col. STATE HOSPITAL (REDEVELOPMENT) .............................................................................................................. 6651 Statement—[Nicola Sturgeon]. The Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Health and Wellbeing (Nicola Sturgeon) ............... 6651 RAPE AND SEXUAL OFFENCES ........................................................................................................................ 6662 Motion moved—[Lord Advocate]. Amendment moved—[Pauline McNeill]. The Lord Advocate (Elish Angiolini) .......................................................................................................... 6662 Pauline McNeill (Glasgow Kelvin) (Lab) .................................................................................................... 6667 Bill Aitken (Glasgow) (Con) ....................................................................................................................... 6671 Margaret Smith (Edinburgh West) (LD) ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Return of Political Patronage
    CIVITAS CIVITAS Institute for the Study of Civil Society The Return of Political Patronage 55 Tufton Street, London, SW1P 3QL Tel: 020 7799 6677 Email: [email protected] Web: www.civitas.org.uk How special advisers are taking over from civil servants and why we need to worry about it ‘ o-one in power has announced it. No-one in power has even admitted it. But the actions of successive governments have been to downgrade N and marginalise objective civil service advice, and to replace it with counsel from politically committed special advisers.’ The special adviser – or ‘spad’ – has become firmly established in Westminster The Return of Political Patronage folklore over the past two decades, coming to symbolise much that is questionable about modern politics. The likes of Jo Moore, who urged colleagues to use 9/11 to bury bad news, and Damian McBride, who schemed on behalf of Gordon Brown against members of his own cabinet, have lent the Whitehall caricatures of the television comedy The Thick of It more than a veneer of credibility. But the implications for government of this growing cadre of politically-motivated apparatchiks are no joke, extending well beyond the chicanery of a few high- profile figures. In this excoriating account of contemporary government, Alasdair Palmer – who has worked up close with spads in the Home Office and spent years documenting Whitehall machinations as a journalist – portrays the return of political patronage to the highest levels of our public administration. It is a phenomenon that the Northcote-Trevelyan reforms of the mid-19th century were meant to banish, and one which now threatens Britain’s rare and precious heritage of relatively efficient, relatively uncorrupt government.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability in Scotland a Baseline Study
    Disability Rights Commission Disability in Scotland A Baseline Study Sheila Riddell and Pauline Banks A report prepared for the Disability Rights Commission Scotland Office by the Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research, University of Glasgow, June 2001 The Disability Rights Commission The Disability Rights Commission (DRC) is an independent body, established by Act of Parliament to eliminate the discrimination faced by disabled people and promote equality of opportunity. When disabled people participate - as citizens, customers and employees - everyone benefits. So we have set ourselves the goal of “a society where all disabled people can participate fully as equal citizens”. We work with disabled people and their organisations, the business community, Government and public sector agencies to achieve practical solutions that are effective for employers, service providers and disabled people alike. There are roughly 8.5 million disabled people in Britain - one in seven of the population. This covers people with epilepsy, cancer, schizophrenia, Down’s syndrome and many other types of impairment. Under the Disability Discrimination Act (1995), many legal rights and obligations affecting disabled people’s access to services and employment are already in force. Others become law in 2004. Many people are still not aware that they have many new rights. And employers and service providers are often unsure how to implement “best practice” to make it easier for disabled people to use their services or gain employment. The DRC has offices in England, Scotland and Wales. We are here to assist and advise through our Helpline, Disability Conciliation Service, the Casework, Legal, and Practice Development Teams, publications, research and policy work.
    [Show full text]