Comparative Politics Newsletter the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparative Politics Newsletter the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association Volume 27, Issue 2, Fall Comparative Politics Newsletter The Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association Editors: Matt Golder ([email protected]), Sona N. Golder ([email protected]) Editorial Assistant: Charles Crabtree, Jinhyuk Jang Editorial Board: Molly Ariotti, Xun Cao, Elizabeth C. Carlson, Yaoyao Dai, Kostanca Dhima, Amanda Fidalgo, Vineeta Yadav, Joseph Wright Contents Letter from the Editors byMattGolderandSonaN.Golder .....................................................................2 I. Symposium: Race and Ethnic Politics in Comparative Perspective Cognitive Biases in Ethnic Politics by Claire L. Adida and Gwyneth McClendon . 4 Diversity and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from Poland byVolhaCharnysh ..................................................11 Immigration and Ethnic Politics in Europe: Fertile Ground for Interdisciplinary Research and Theory Building by Rafaela Dancygier . 17 Misfit Politics: Identity Construction and Vote Choice byAdamHarris .........................................................22 Bringing Together Studies of Ethnic Prejudice and Ethnic Conflict in China byYueHou ..........................................28 Preserving White America: White Racial Identity and Support for Nationalist Policies by Ashley Jardina . 31 From Racial Democracy to Racial-ized Democracy in Latin America byMarcusA.Johnson,Jr. ...................................37 Electoral Institutions and Ethnic Clientelism byKristenKao ...................................................................44 Studying Minorities in the Middle East: The Kurdish Case byEkremKarakoç ...................................................50 China’s Local Ethnic Exclusion: Cross-region and Within-region Patterns in Tibet and Xinjiang byChuyuLiu ......................55 Ethnicity, Parties, and Electoral Violence in Developing Democracies byAditiMalik .............................................61 Europe’s Urban-Rural Divide on Immigration byRahsaanMaxwell .............................................................67 South Asian Americans in the post-9/11 United States: Panethnicity and Religion by Sangay Mishra . 71 Race, Ethnicity, and the Participation Gap: Comparing Australia with Canada and the United States by Juliet Pietsch . 76 Ethnic Visibility byAmandaL.Robinson ....................................................................................79 Revisiting the Relationship between Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision by Prerna Singh and Matthias vom Hau . 89 Identity and Political Attitudes: What Insights Can an Alternative Measurement Strategy Provide? by Amber D. Spry . 96 II. Dataset Democratic Electoral Systems around the World, 1946-2016 by Nils-Christian Bormann, Adina Pintilie, and Jack N. Smith . 100 III. Other Call for Bids: New Editorial Team for the Comparative Politics Newsletter .....................................................104 Contributors .............................................................................................................106 http://comparativenewsletter.com/ [email protected] 1 Letter from the Editors goods provision. by Matt Golder & Sona N. Golder The Pennsylvania State University Ethnic Visibility. Two contributions touch on issues re- lated to ethnic visibility. In one contribution, Amanda Welcome to the Fall 2017 issue of the Comparative Pol- Robinson (Ohio State University) notes that most theo- itics Newsletter. Our current issue includes a sympo- retical accounts linking ethnicity to political outcomes sium on Race and Ethnicity in Comparative Perspective assumes, at least implicitly, that ethnicity is ‘visible.’ As and a brief overview of the latest update to the Demo- she notes, though, ethnicity is often not as visible as cratic Electoral Systems (DES) dataset. It also includes many of these theories assume. If there is variation in a call for bids for those interested in taking over the ed- the extent to which ethnicity is visible, then this has im- itorship of the Newsletter. plications for when and how we should expect to see ethnicity affect things like interethnic trust, political I. Symposium on Race and Ethnicity in Comparative Per- participation, ethnic party support, and politically rel- spective evant identification. Amanda describes several of her research projects looking at the effect of variation in In this issue of the Comparative Politics Newslet- ethnic visibility with respect to different political out- ter, we wanted to highlight the interesting research be- comes in Africa and the United States. Adam Harris ing conducted by primarily, but not exclusively, junior (University of Gothenburg) addresses ethnic visibility scholars in the area of race and ethnicity. In total, we from a slightly different perspective. In his contribu- have seventeen contributions, all of which address im- tion, Adam argues that group members who look visibly portant topics in the race and ethnicity literature in re- different from the modal group member are less likely gions as diverse as Europe, Africa, South America, Asia, to take actions in line with their group. To evaluate his the Middle East, North America, and Australasia. empirical claims he examines how ‘racial distance’ in skin tone from the modal group member modifies the Diversity and Public Goods Provision. Two of our impact of group membership on ‘group voting’ in South contributions challenge the consensus belief in the lit- Africa, Brazil, and the United States. erature that ethnic diversity is bad for public goods pro- vision. In her contribution, Volha Charnysh (Prince- Ethnic Violence. We have three contributions that dis- ton University) argues that ethnic homogeneity can be cuss ethnic violence. Two of these contributions ex- beneficial for public goods provision when formal in- amine ethnic conflict in China. In one contribution, stitutions provided by the state are weak but that it can Yue Hou (University of Pennsylvania) argues that there be harmful when formal institutions are strong. This should be more interaction between the literature ad- is because the informal mechanisms that promote co- dressing ethnic prejudice and the literature addressing operation in homogenous societies are ‘second best’ ethnic conflict. In doing so, she highlights recent devel- and can limit competition and breed corruption when opments in these literatures as they relate to the Xinjiang the state is sufficiently strong to provide public goods province in China. In a second contribution, Chuyu Liu such as law and order. She presents evidence in sup- (Pennsylvania State University) examines local patterns port of her argument by looking at the historical record of ethnic exclusion in Tibet and Xinjiang. Among other of public goods provision in Poland’s ‘Recovered Ter- things, Chuyu shows that the Chinese government has ritories’ — the former German territories that became responded in very different ways to the threat of ethnic part of Poland at the end of World War II. In the sec- conflict in these two regions. Our third contribution on ond contribution, Prerna Singh (Brown University) and ethnic conflict comes from Aditi Malik (College of the Mattias vom Hau (Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Interna- Holy Cross), who examines how volatility in the party cionals) provide a more general critique of those studies system influences ethnic electoral violence. Drawing reporting a causal link between ethnic diversity and on empirical evidence in India and Kenya, Aditi argues poor public goods provision. In particular, they high- that (ethnic) electoral violence is more likely in unsta- light the ahistoricity of these studies and raise concerns ble party systems where party leaders have shorter time about the decision to treat ethnic diversity as exogenous horizons and where they worry less about voter sanc- rather than as an endogenous outcome of the historical tions for engaging in violence. nation-state building process and prior levels of public http://comparativenewsletter.com/ [email protected] 2 Group Identity and Group Consciousness. Four con- ticularly with respect to identity politics in developing tributions address various aspects of group identity and countries. Drawing on an experimental study in Benin, group consciousness. In one contribution, Ashley Jar- Claire and Gwyneth find evidence of ethnically moti- dina (Duke University) discusses white racial identity vated reasoning with respect to how individuals eval- in the United States and its connections with national- uate incumbent legislators. Specifically, they find that ist policies. She argues that white racial identity is not information about incumbent legislative performance strongly associated with out-group animus or prejudice, amplifies positive (negative) views of coethnic (non- but it is strongly linked to support for nationalist poli- coethnic) incumbents. Many scholars have argued that cies relating to immigration, outsourcing, and foreign ethnic voting is a product of low-information environ- intervention. In a second contribution, Amber Spry ments. Claire and Gwyneth’s study suggests, though, (Columbia University) discusses different measurement that ethnic ties might condition information process- strategies for analyzing the relationship between group ing, with the implication that access to more political identity and political attitudes in the context of the information may reinforce, rather than reduce, ethnic United States. In particular, she argues that scholars
Recommended publications
  • Managing Meritocracy in Clientelistic Democracies∗
    Managing Meritocracy in Clientelistic Democracies∗ Sarah Brierleyy Washington University in St Louis May 8, 2018 Abstract Competitive recruitment for certain public-sector positions can co-exist with partisan hiring for others. Menial positions are valuable for sustaining party machines. Manipulating profes- sional positions, on the other hand, can undermine the functioning of the state. Accordingly, politicians will interfere in hiring partisans to menial position but select professional bureau- crats on meritocratic criteria. I test my argument using novel bureaucrat-level data from Ghana (N=18,778) and leverage an exogenous change in the governing party to investigate hiring pat- terns. The results suggest that partisan bias is confined to menial jobs. The findings shed light on the mixed findings regarding the effect of electoral competition on patronage; competition may dissuade politicians from interfering in hiring to top-rank positions while encouraging them to recruit partisans to lower-ranked positions [123 words]. ∗I thank Brian Crisp, Stefano Fiorin, Barbara Geddes, Mai Hassan, George Ofosu, Dan Posner, Margit Tavits, Mike Thies and Daniel Triesman, as well as participants at the African Studies Association Annual Conference (2017) for their comments. I also thank Gangyi Sun for excellent research assistance. yAssistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis. Email: [email protected]. 1 Whether civil servants are hired by merit or on partisan criteria has broad implications for state capacity and the overall health of democracy (O’Dwyer, 2006; Grzymala-Busse, 2007; Geddes, 1994). When politicians exchange jobs with partisans, then these jobs may not be essential to the running of the state.
    [Show full text]
  • 7972-1 Comparative Political Institutions (Clark)
    COMPARATIVE POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS Political Science 7972 Prof Wm A Clark Thursdays 9:00-12:00 213 Stubbs Hall 210 Stubbs Hall [email protected] Fall 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTION This course is dedicated to the comparative analysis of political institutions, which in comparative politics are viewed as either formal rules or organizations. The primary orientation of the course material lies in state governmental institutions, although some social institutions will also be examined. The course focuses on what has come to be called the "new institutionalism," which adopts a more decidedly structural or state-centric approach to politics. It emphasizes the relative autonomy of political institutions, and thus seeks to present a counterweight to the predominant view of politics as merely a reflection of the aggregation of individual preferences and behaviors. If it can be argued that individuals and institutions impact each other, the new institutionalism focuses primary attention on how relatively autonomous political institutions (i.e., rules and organizations) affect individual political behavior. COURSE REQUIREMENTS Each student’s semester grade will be determined on the basis of four tasks, detailed below. [1] Research paper: weighted at 35% of the course grade. This paper is to be modeled on a typical conference paper. The paper should focus on the downstream consequence(s) of a national or sub-national institutional variable; that is, it should adopt an institutional factor (or factors) as the independent variable(s). It should focus on any country other than the USA, and may adopt any traditional form of institutional analysis. It must be fully cited and written to professional standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment Report
    CAREER MANAGEMENT CENTER Employment Report “One of the most important things we do is to connect companies with the right individuals, groups and resources at Kellogg — students, faculty, alumni and the administration. That’s when we 2009 all realize the full value of creating and sustaining strong relationships.” Table of Contents 4 Class of 2009 Profile 5 Demographic Information: Class of 2009 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Work Experience 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Undergraduate Degree 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Age 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Gender 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Geographic Distribution 6 Major Industries Chosen by Graduates, 2005-2009 6 Class of 2009 Graduate Base Salary Acceptances by Industry 7 Major Functions Chosen by Graduates, 2005-2009 7 Class of 2009 Graduate Base Salary Acceptances by Function 8 Major Employers 9 Graduate Sign-On Bonus by Industry Group 9 Graduate Sign-On Bonus by Functional Group 10 Corporate Recruiters 11 Job Acceptances: Class of 2009 by Company 15 Job Acceptances: Class of 2009 by Student 15 Two-Year MBA & JD-MBA students 27 One-Year MBA students 29 MMM students 30 Part-Time MBA students 33 Major Industries Chosen by Summer Interns, 2005-2009 33 Class of 2010 Summer Intern Salary Acceptances by Industry 34 Major Functions Chosen by Summer Interns, 2005-2009 34 Class of 2010 Summer Intern Salary Acceptances by Function 35 Major Summer Intern Employers 36 Summer Acceptances: Class of 2010 by Company 41 Summer Acceptances: Class of 2010 by Student 41 Two-Year MBA & JD-MBA students 54 MMM students 57 Kellogg Corporate Affiliates 58 Career Management Center Staff The power of collaboration Cover quote: Roxanne Hori, Assistant Dean and Director, Career Management Center Kellogg School of Management 1 he Kellogg School of Management at Companies that sustain relationships with the Kellogg Northwestern University is well known for its School also benefit from other mutually rewarding emphasis on collaboration and teamwork inside opportunities and programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Science 2 Introduction to Comparative Politics 3 Units; 3
    Political Science 2 Introduction to Comparative Politics 3 units; 3 hours lecture Recommended Preparation: Political Science 1 and eligibility for English 1A Credit, degree applicable Transfer CSU, UC In this course students will analyze political systems of different countries in a comparative context. Emphasis will be placed on studying the differences and similarities of governmental systems found in developed democratic nation-states. Developing countries, regional systems, and new democracies will also be analyzed to illustrate the complex nature of creating and maintaining a functioning nation-state system. Course Objectives: 1. Identify and assess the basic theory of comparative political analysis and the commonly applied methodology. 2. Identify and evaluate the structures and functions common to all political systems. 3. Analyze the geopolitical, cultural, and historical antecedents of nation-states for comparative analysis. 4. Evaluate cultural-political systems in developing non-democratic nation-states. 5. Assess procedures used in democratic political systems in the determination of policy and legislation. 6. Evaluate and examine the major institutions that contribute to the political process. 7. Describe and analyze the European Union as a model of regional integration. 8. Identify and evaluate current government systems. 9. Assess the ways in which political parties, interest groups, and public opinion effect the political process. Student Learning Outcomes: SLO#1 Political Systems- In a written essay, the students will discuss and critically analyze both differences and similarities found among different political systems as they pertain to the functions that their institutions perform. SLO#2 Institutional Choices- In a written essay, students will demonstrate knowledge and analyze the difference between presidential and parliamentary system and the impact they have one the policymaking process.
    [Show full text]
  • SIS 802 Comparative Politics
    Ph.D. Seminar in Comparative Politics SIS 802, Fall 2016 School of International Service American University COURSE INFORMATION Professor: Matthew M. Taylor Email: [email protected] Classes will be held on Tuesdays, 2:35-5:15pm Office hours: Wednesdays (11:30pm-3:30pm) and by appointment. In the case of appointments, please email me at least two days in advance to schedule. Office: SIS 350 COURSE DESCRIPTION Comparative political science is one of the four traditional subfields of political science. It differs from international relations in its focus on individual countries and regions, and its comparison across units – national, subnational, actors, and substantive themes. Yet it is vital to scholars of international relations, not least because of its ability to explain differences in the basic postures of national and subnational actors, as well as in its focus on key variables of interest to international relations, such as democratization, the organization of state decision-making, and state capacity. Both subfields have benefited historically from considerable methodological and theoretical cross-fertilization which has shaped the study of international affairs significantly. The first section of the course focuses on the epistemology of comparative political science, seeking to understand how we know what we know, the accumulation of knowledge, and the objectivity of the social sciences. The remainder of the course addresses substantive debates in the field, although students are encouraged to critically address the theoretical and methodological approaches that are used to explore these substantive issues. COURSE OBJECTIVES This course will introduce students to the field, analyzing many of the essential components of comparative political science: themes, debates, and concepts, as well as different theoretical and methodological approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Elector System Design and Ethnic Separatism: a Rationalist Approach to Ethnic Politics in Eastern Europe
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects Political Science Department Spring 2000 Elector System Design and Ethnic Separatism: A Rationalist Approach to Ethnic Politics in Eastern Europe Eric Wesselkamper '00 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/polisci_honproj Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Wesselkamper '00, Eric, "Elector System Design and Ethnic Separatism: A Rationalist Approach to Ethnic Politics in Eastern Europe" (2000). Honors Projects. 7. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/polisci_honproj/7 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. • Electoral System Design and Ethnic Separatism A Rationalist Approach to Ethnic Politics in Eastern Europe Eric Wesselkamper Spring 2000 The resurgence ofnationalism taking place throughout Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union raises important questions with respect to ethnic political mobilization, particularly with respect to the potentialfor ethnic separatism. Moreover, the region provides scholars an excellent setting in which to study the political effects ofconstitutional choices.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Best Practices: a Model Annual State of the Parliament Report*
    GLOBAL BEST PRACTICES: A MODEL ANNUAL STATE OF THE PARLIAMENT REPORT* A Strategic Monitoring and Reporting Tool for Promoting Democratic Parliaments Worldwide (2005) • Contact: Professor Keith Henderson, [email protected]; [email protected] or [email protected] A number of experts from other regions made significant contributions to developing this framework, including Sandra Elena from Argentina, Violaine Autheman from France and Rosie Zigormo from Zimbabwe, as well as the Canadian Parliamentary Centre. IFES Parliamentary Tool Kit Model State of Parliament Report: Framework TABLE OF CONTENTS IFES Parliamentary Toolkit: Multiple Uses of the Annual State of Parliament Report 3 IFES Parliamentary Toolkit: Parliamentary Transparency and Accountability Standards 4 Abstract 5 1. Overview: Country Context and Methodology 6 a. The Functions of Parliament in the Country Context 6 b. Scope of the State of Parliament Report: the IFES Parliamentary Transparency and Accountability Standards, PTAS 8 c. Multifaceted Methodology 9 2. Relevant International and Domestic Legal and Institutional Framework 11 a. International and Regional Obligations 11 b. Constitutional Standards 12 c. Country Legal Framework 12 d. Country Institutional Framework 12 3. Assessment of the Level of Compliance with the PTAS 13 PTAS.1: Independence of Parliament 13 PTAS.2: Free and Fair Parliamentary Elections 14 PTAS.3: Transparent, Adequate Political Financing and Compensation 14 PTAS.4: Representative Parliament 16 PTAS.5: Security of Tenure 16 PTAS.6:
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Men's Track & Field Record Book Through 2021 Season
    PAGE HEADER University of Michigan Men's Track & Field Record Book Through 2021 Season 1 PAGEHISTORY HEADER annual results Indoor Indoor Outdoor Outdoor 1989 . 4th (68) . t10th(16) . 6th (57) . 30th (10) . Harvey Year Big Ten NCAA Big Ten NCAA Coach 1990 . 8th (26) . * . 6th (55) . * . Harvey 1901 . - . 1st (38) . - . Fitzpatrick 1991 . 4th (55) . * . 4th (58) . t74th(1) . Harvey 1902 . - . 1st (36) . - . Fitzpatrick 1992 . 10th(16) . * . 8th (35) . t59th(1) . Harvey 1903 . - . 1st (49) . - . Fitzpatrick 1993 . 8th (26) . * . 7th (61) . * . Harvey 1904 . - . 1st (32) . - . Fitzpatrick 1994 . 1st (91) . t17th(12) . 4th (94 .5) . t42nd(6) . Harvey 1905 . - . 2nd(38) . - . Fitzpatrick 1995 . 3rd (93) . t4th (25) . 2nd(112 .5) . t19th(11) . Harvey 1906 . - . 1st (62.8) . - . Fitzpatrick 1996 . t6th(37) . t30th(8) . 7th (71) . 18th (16) . Harvey 1918 . 1st (42) . 1st (37.5) . - . Farrell 1997 . 5th (67 .3) . t13th (15) . 3rd (97) . t13th(17) . Harvey 1919 . 1st (36.5) . 1st (44.5) . - . Farrell 1998 . 6th (62) . 6th (20) . 4th (97) . 23rd (10) . Harvey 1920 . 2nd (27 .5) . 2nd(30) . - . Farrell 1999 . 9th (50 .5) . t47th (2) . 7th (70 .5) . * . Harvey 1921 . 2nd (25 .5) . 2nd(35 .5) . 11th(5) . Farrell 2000 . 6th (62) . t41st (4) . 8th (65) . * . Warhurst 1922 . 5th (7 .33) . 7th (20 .6) . t6th(10) . Farrell 2001 . 7th (58) . * . t8th(43) . * . Warhurst 1923 . 1st (43.5) . 1st (57.5) . 1st (29 1/2) Farrell 2002 . ^ . * . 9th (39) . t28th (2) . Warhurst 1924 . 2nd (19) . 3rd (31 .5) . + . Farrell 2003 . 6th (51 .5) . t13th (16) . 7th (56) . t52nd(4) . Warhurst 1925 . 1st (22.33) . 1st (45.5) . + . Farrell 2004 . 3rd (94 .5) .
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads of Previous Issue Since Publication (25Th of January 2011–10Th of August 2011): 946
    Volume 4, Number 2, July 2011 CompaJ O U R N A Lr Oa F tive Politics ISSN 1338-1385 GG NON-DETERMINANTSGOFGCORRUPTION:G AGSCEPTICALGVIEWGFROMGEASTERNGEUROPE Anris ZIMELIS GG COSMOPOLITISMGASGTHEGENDGOFGPATRIOTISMG AMONGGSLOVENIANGYOUTH Lea NAHTIGAL and Vladimir PREBILIČ GG THEGEUROPEANGFUTURESGANDGCOHESIVEGEUROPE:GG EU2020GSTRATEGYGANDGCOHESIONGPOLICYGWITHGFLEXIBLEG INTEGRATION Attila ÁGH GG BOSNIAGANDGHERZEGOVINAGBETWEENGDAYTONGANDG BRUSSELS Rudi KOCJANČIČ GG DELIBERATIONGANDGONLINEGPARTICIPATION:G THEGCASEGOFGTHEGSLOVENIANGPORTALG“IGPROPOSEGTOGTHEG GOVERNMENT” Tanja OBLAK-ČRNIČ, Jernej PRODNIK and Nika TRBIŽAN GG NETWORKEDGCITIES’GRESPONSESGTOGGLOBALG PROBLEMS:GG AGTYPOLOGY Nikita CHIU Journal of Comparative Politics 2 Editorial Team General Editor General Editor Miro Haček Peter Csányi Department of Political Science Pan European University Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of Political Science University of Ljubljana Tomášikova 20, 821 02 Kardeljeva ploščad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia Bratislava, Slovakia [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Irena Bačlija Department of Political Science Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ljubljana Kardeljeva ploščad 5, Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] JCP uses two-sided peer review process before publication. Those wishing to sub- mit papers should send their e-version to either of the General Editors at one of the addresses above in compliance with the Submission Guidelines. The views ex- pressed are neither those of either of co-publishers. Authors
    [Show full text]
  • Altered States: a Comparison of Separation of Powers in the United States and in the United Kingdom
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Law Faculty Articles and Essays Faculty Scholarship 1990 Altered States: A Comparison of Separation of Powers in the United States and in the United Kingdom James G. Wilson Cleveland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/fac_articles Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Comparative Politics Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Original Citation James G. Wilson, Altered States: A Comparison of Separation of Powers in the United States and in the United Kingdom, 18 Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 125 (1990) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Articles and Essays by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 18 Hastings Const. L.Q. 125 1990-1991 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Wed Sep 12 11:33:36 2012 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0094-5617 Altered States: A Comparison of Separation of Powers in the United States and in the United Kingdom By JAMES G.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Legislatures Thursdays: 2:00 – 4:50Pm Location: 210 Stubbs
    POLI 7971: Comparative Legislatures Thursdays: 2:00 – 4:50pm Location: 210 Stubbs Professor: Dr. Yann Kerevel Office Hours: Wednesdays 1-3pm or by appt. Office: 230 Stubbs Email: [email protected] Overview The study of legislative institutions has been dominated by research on the U.S. Congress. Despite this singular focus, the design of legislatures, their organization, their relations with other branches of government, the methods by which legislative representatives reach office, and the way in which representatives serve their constituents vary widely across countries. This course is designed to introduce students to research on legislatures across the globe. Required Readings Most readings are peer-reviewed journal articles easily found through the LSU library system or Google Scholar. Any book chapters will be provided in PDF format on Moodle. Evaluation Weekly writing assignments and discussion questions: 20% Each week in which there are assigned readings, I expect students to write a 2- 3 page critical review of the week’s readings. In your review, you should address at least some of the questions listed below. In addition to writing the 2-page review, I also expect students to submit at least 3 questions related to the readings for discussion. The writing assignment and the 3 questions are due by 12pm on the day of class and should be submitted electronically by email. To receive full credit for these assignments, they must all be turned in on time, they must meet the basic requirements, and it must be clear to me you have read all of the week’s material. I will not be providing weekly, individual feedback on these assignments but I will reach out to individual students early in the semester with comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Appropriations for 2010 Hearings Committee on Appropriations
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2010 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE JOHN P. MURTHA, Pennsylvania, Chairman NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia TODD TIAHRT, Kansas MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio JACK KINGSTON, Georgia ALLEN BOYD, Florida KAY GRANGER, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York CAROLYN C. KILPATRICK, Michigan NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Obey, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Lewis, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. PAUL JUOLA, GREG LANKLER, SARAH YOUNG, LINDA PAGELSEN, PAUL TERRY, KRIS MALLARD, ADAM HARRIS, ANN REESE, BROOKE BOYER, TIM PRINCE, MATT WASHINGTON, B G WRIGHT, CHRIS WHITE, CELES HUGHES, and ADRIENNE RAMSAY, Staff Assistants SHERRY L. YOUNG, Administrative Aide PART 1 Page Air Force Nuclear Enterprise ............................................... 1 Contract Services and Acquisition Management ............ 55 Army Contracting .................................................................... 283 Outsourcing ............................................................................... 353 Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Problems ................................................................................
    [Show full text]