Employment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Employment Report CAREER MANAGEMENT CENTER Employment Report “One of the most important things we do is to connect companies with the right individuals, groups and resources at Kellogg — students, faculty, alumni and the administration. That’s when we 2009 all realize the full value of creating and sustaining strong relationships.” Table of Contents 4 Class of 2009 Profile 5 Demographic Information: Class of 2009 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Work Experience 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Undergraduate Degree 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Age 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Gender 5 Base Salary Acceptances by Geographic Distribution 6 Major Industries Chosen by Graduates, 2005-2009 6 Class of 2009 Graduate Base Salary Acceptances by Industry 7 Major Functions Chosen by Graduates, 2005-2009 7 Class of 2009 Graduate Base Salary Acceptances by Function 8 Major Employers 9 Graduate Sign-On Bonus by Industry Group 9 Graduate Sign-On Bonus by Functional Group 10 Corporate Recruiters 11 Job Acceptances: Class of 2009 by Company 15 Job Acceptances: Class of 2009 by Student 15 Two-Year MBA & JD-MBA students 27 One-Year MBA students 29 MMM students 30 Part-Time MBA students 33 Major Industries Chosen by Summer Interns, 2005-2009 33 Class of 2010 Summer Intern Salary Acceptances by Industry 34 Major Functions Chosen by Summer Interns, 2005-2009 34 Class of 2010 Summer Intern Salary Acceptances by Function 35 Major Summer Intern Employers 36 Summer Acceptances: Class of 2010 by Company 41 Summer Acceptances: Class of 2010 by Student 41 Two-Year MBA & JD-MBA students 54 MMM students 57 Kellogg Corporate Affiliates 58 Career Management Center Staff The power of collaboration Cover quote: Roxanne Hori, Assistant Dean and Director, Career Management Center Kellogg School of Management 1 he Kellogg School of Management at Companies that sustain relationships with the Kellogg Northwestern University is well known for its School also benefit from other mutually rewarding emphasis on collaboration and teamwork inside opportunities and programs. Firms can participate in the Tand outside the classroom. This same spirit is Global Initiatives in Management program, experiential evident in the school’s partnership with companies and learning opportunities, classes, conferences, and more. organizations that look to Kellogg for their future leaders. And, of course, many companies have established Finding the right fit requires a team effort. valuable connections with our world-class faculty who, through their research, innovations and thought As the front line for that team, the Kellogg Career leadership, are helping to define the science and practice Management Center staff work hard to build and maintain of management in the 21st century. strong relationships with the companies and organizations that recruit our students. The more we understand their More than the numbers missions, goals and staffing needs, the better we can The Kellogg School of Management 2009 Employment represent their interests to our students and, similarly, the Report provides valuable information for companies better we can offer advice and guidance to our students. interested in recruiting at Kellogg; prospective students who factor employment results when selecting a business This has proven particularly true in the current economic school; current students who are evaluating job prospects environment, where the breadth of opportunities and and possibilities, and alumni who take a great interest and future prospects aren’t always evident in annual reports pride in what’s happening at Kellogg. and financial statements. We believe in helping our students gain a complete picture before making career- As informative as the numbers may be, the Career defining decisions. Management Center can offer additional insight into what they mean for you. Regardless of your current relationship Expanding the relationship with Kellogg or the nature of your interest in our career The Kellogg School offers a wide variety of opportunities services, we invite you to collaborate with us in facing your for employers to connect with our students, including challenges and fulfilling your needs. on-campus presentations and interviews, job postings, outbound treks by students, site visits to companies by For more information please visit kellogg.northwestern. our staff and our highly successful internship program. edu/career, call us at 847.491.3168, or email [email protected]. For staff contact information, please see page 58. 2 Breadth. Depth. Diversity. Talent. ur 2009 employment report underscores the qualities that make Kellogg a universally attractive source for management talent. The breadth of industries that successfully recruit at Kellogg is Otestament to the strength of our academic programs across all business and management disciplines. Our class size adds depth to that breadth; companies with even the most exacting requirements can nearly always identify a Kellogg graduate who can fulfill their specific needs. And the diversity of our students—in terms of culture, origin, professional experience, and educational background—enriches the pool of talent from which companies can draw. 3 Class of 2009 Profile Demographics Number of students graduating in the class of 2009 776 Two-Year MBA students 505 One-Year MBA students 75 Part-Time MBA students 115 MMM students* 58 JD-MBA students** 23 Age range at graduation 26-41 Full time work experience 100% Average length (years) 5.3 Female 34% Minority 22% International 34% Undergraduate majors Business 25% Economics 18% Engineering/Sciences 33% Social Sciences/Humanities 24% Undergraduate institutions represented 237 Employment summary Number of graduates reporting employment status to CMC 590 Number of graduate acceptances reported 551 Number of 1st year students reporting employment status to CMC 522 Number of internship acceptances reported 521 * Dual-degree MBA + MEM program in design and operations. ** Joint Law School/Kellogg students. 4 Demographic Information – Class of 2009 Base Salary Acceptances by Geographic Distribution Region Percent* Range ($) Average ($) Median ($) Base Salary Acceptances by Work Experience United States 78 53,000-320,000 111,003 110,000 Experience Percent* Range ($) Average ($) Median ($) Northeast1 14 57,000-320,000 109,043 105,000 1-2 Years 7 85,000-250,000 113,880 111,000 Boston 2 57,000-320,000 128,781 125,000 3-5 Years 45 34,000-320,000 110,340 110,000 New York City 9 60,000-165,000 106,917 105,000 6-9 Years 46 50,000-240,000 110,378 109,500 Other Northeast 2 85,000-120,000 97,150 95,000 10-15 Years 2 90,000-175,000 121,250 120,000 Mid-Atlantic2 3 75,000-126,000 101,850 95,750 Philadelphia 1 90,000-125,000 102,150 95,750 Base Salary Acceptances by Undergraduate Degree Washington D.C. 2 75,000-126,000 102,556 100,000 Degree Percent* Range ($) Average ($) Median ($) South3 3 85,000-132,000 109,769 120,000 Nontechnical 42 50,000-250,000 108,250 100,000 Midwest4 34 65,000-300,000 114,149 110,000 Technical 47 34,000-320,000 111,619 110,000 Chicago 28 65,000-300,000 118,091 120,000 Other 11 80,000-300,000 117,250 120,000 Minneapolis 4 85,500-125,000 95,780 95,000 Base Salary Acceptances by Age Other Midwest 2 82,000-125,000 100,500 97,500 Age Percent* Range ($) Average ($) Median ($) Southwest5 7 70,000-150,000 110,619 112,500 25-26 5 71,000-135,000 106,497 104,000 Dallas/Ft. Worth 2 85,000-130,000 116,154 125,000 27-29 49 34,000-320,000 110,040 110,000 Other Southwest 4 70,000-150,000 107,348 103,000 30 or > 46 40,000-250,000 112,013 110,000 West6 17 53,000-210,000 108,410 110,000 Los Angeles 3 53,000-130,000 102,941 97,000 Base Salary Acceptances by Gender San Francisco 10 80,000-210,000 114,872 115,000 Gender Percent* Range ($) Average ($) Median ($) Seattle 2 90,000-125,000 107,000 110,000 Female 35 63,600-230,000 105,767 100,000 Other West 2 67,500- 97,500 88,167 90,000 Male 65 34,000-320,000 113,514 110,000 International 22 34,000-250,000 109,890 109,500 *Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. Africa † Asia - East Asia 9 40,000-240,000 109,032 110,000 Asia - South/Southeast 1 34,000-150,000 98,500 105,000 Australia/South Pacific † Caribbean † Europe - Eastern † Europe - Western 3 80,000-250,000 118,600 112,000 Europe - London 2 88,000-160,000 111,389 105,000 Middle East † North America - Non U.S. 2 50,000-148,000 107,000 112,500 South America 3 63,600-140,000 106,114 100,000 1. Including CT, MA, NH, NJ, NY, RI *Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number. 2. Including DC, DE, MD, PA, VA †Less than 1 percent of accepted offers. 3. Including AR, GA, NC 4. Including IL, IN, KS, MN, OH, WI 5. Including CO, TX 6. Including CA, NV, WA Employment Report — Class of 2009 Job Acceptances 5 Major Industries Chosen by Graduates 2005-2009 Graduate Base Salary Acceptances by Industry Percent of Acceptances* Industry Percent* Range ($) Average ($) Median ($) Industry 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 Manufacturing 27% 34,000-185,000 99,449 96,000 Consulting 38 33 31 33 32 Biotechnology 1% 95,800-110,000 100,075 97,250 Consumer & packaged goods 10 10 10 11 11 Computer hardware 2% 93,000-125,000 106,625 103,000 High-tech manufacturing & services 9 9 9 11 8 Computer software 3% 80,000-140,000 110,143 113,500 Investment banking, brokerage & securities 5 12 11 8 11 Energy 2% 105,000-132,000 115,875 112,500 Media & entertainment 2 1 2 – – Food/beverage 8% 50,000-185,000 95,359 95,000 Other financial services, private equity 10 13 14 10 11 Healthcare products 3% 63,600-128,000 100,186 101,250 & venture capital Household/personal products 2% 80,000- 97,000 93,227 95,000 Other manufacturing 5 6 5 7 5 Medical devices 2% 34,000-117,000 89,438 99,250 Other services 13 10 13 13 13 Pharmaceuticals 1% 85,000-120,000 101,168 99,000 Pharmaceutical, biotechnology, healthcare 8 6 7 7 9 Widely diversified manufacturing 1% 85,500-95,750 91,687 92,750 *Percentages have been rounded to the nearest whole number.
Recommended publications
  • Symbols Alexian Brothers Health System Index to Nov P
    Volume 19, Index December 2014 Symbols Alexian Brothers Health System Index to Nov p. 2 Health Care M&A News 1-800-CONTACTS Feb p. 18 A&L Goodbody Apr p. 16, July p. 16 All Care Home Health, LLC Feb p. 17 Each company and orga- A Allergan Inc. Feb p. 10, May p. 1, nization discussed in Health May p. 19, Jun p. 15, July p. 3, Care M&A News, from Janu- Abbott Labs July p. 3, Aug p. 17, July p. 10, Sept p. 16, Oct p. 3, ary through December 2014, Dec p. 4 Nov p. 1, Dec p. 4, Dec p. 16, is listed alphabetically here. AbbVie Inc. July p. 3, July p. 16, Dec p. 19 References are typically to Aug p. 9, Oct p. 2, Oct p. 16, Allscripts Feb p. 2, Apr p. 10 the first occurrence of the Nov p. 19, Dec p. 2 AllSpire Health Partners Nov p. 2 company’s or organiza- ABL, Inc. Aug p. 18 All Staffing Services Jan p. 17 tion’s name in the pertinent Acadia Healthcare Company Feb p. 16, Almost Family, Inc. Apr p. 16 issue; further discussion July p. 17, Oct p. 17, Nov p. 17 ALN Medical Management, LLC may follow later in the text Accelera Innovations, Inc. Jan p. 17 Accelrys, Inc. Jan p. 15 Feb p. 8 but is not indicated here. AccessClosure, Inc. May p. 15 Alta Partners Jun p. 16 Achillion Pharmaceuticals July p. 17 Altos Solutions, Inc. Jun p. 15 References are sorted by Actavis (Foshan) Pharmaceuticals Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Governance Institute's E
    Volume 11, No. 5, September 2014 Welcome to The Governance Institute’s E-Briefings! This newsletter is designed to inform you about new research and expert opinions in the area of hospital and health system governance, as well as to update you on services and events at The Governance Institute. Please note that you are receiving this newsletter because you are a Governance Institute member or expressed interest at one of our conferences. The Rise of the Hospital Joint Venture By Barry Sagraves, Juniper Advisory, and Ken Marlow, Waller This article is the first in a series examining the advantages of joint ventures, the process of developing a joint venture, and expected trends related to these transactions. Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act in partners that complement and enhance its 2010, more and more hospitals and health systems operations, capitalization, compliance, and quality have entered into some sort of affiliation, whether functions. Exploring a range of joint venture through acquisition, membership substitution, joint alternatives has been found by many systems to be venture, or clinical affiliation. This trend is a result a “best of both worlds” approach—combining the of the mounting pressures hospitals and health installed market presence and reputation of a non- systems face in the current healthcare profit system with the scale, access to capital, and environment. Yet, fundamental change in the management expertise of an investor-owned makeup of the hospital market also paves way for company. innovation, which includes new ways that organizations may partner to confront these Most hospital and health system boards are aware challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan Men's Track & Field Record Book Through 2021 Season
    PAGE HEADER University of Michigan Men's Track & Field Record Book Through 2021 Season 1 PAGEHISTORY HEADER annual results Indoor Indoor Outdoor Outdoor 1989 . 4th (68) . t10th(16) . 6th (57) . 30th (10) . Harvey Year Big Ten NCAA Big Ten NCAA Coach 1990 . 8th (26) . * . 6th (55) . * . Harvey 1901 . - . 1st (38) . - . Fitzpatrick 1991 . 4th (55) . * . 4th (58) . t74th(1) . Harvey 1902 . - . 1st (36) . - . Fitzpatrick 1992 . 10th(16) . * . 8th (35) . t59th(1) . Harvey 1903 . - . 1st (49) . - . Fitzpatrick 1993 . 8th (26) . * . 7th (61) . * . Harvey 1904 . - . 1st (32) . - . Fitzpatrick 1994 . 1st (91) . t17th(12) . 4th (94 .5) . t42nd(6) . Harvey 1905 . - . 2nd(38) . - . Fitzpatrick 1995 . 3rd (93) . t4th (25) . 2nd(112 .5) . t19th(11) . Harvey 1906 . - . 1st (62.8) . - . Fitzpatrick 1996 . t6th(37) . t30th(8) . 7th (71) . 18th (16) . Harvey 1918 . 1st (42) . 1st (37.5) . - . Farrell 1997 . 5th (67 .3) . t13th (15) . 3rd (97) . t13th(17) . Harvey 1919 . 1st (36.5) . 1st (44.5) . - . Farrell 1998 . 6th (62) . 6th (20) . 4th (97) . 23rd (10) . Harvey 1920 . 2nd (27 .5) . 2nd(30) . - . Farrell 1999 . 9th (50 .5) . t47th (2) . 7th (70 .5) . * . Harvey 1921 . 2nd (25 .5) . 2nd(35 .5) . 11th(5) . Farrell 2000 . 6th (62) . t41st (4) . 8th (65) . * . Warhurst 1922 . 5th (7 .33) . 7th (20 .6) . t6th(10) . Farrell 2001 . 7th (58) . * . t8th(43) . * . Warhurst 1923 . 1st (43.5) . 1st (57.5) . 1st (29 1/2) Farrell 2002 . ^ . * . 9th (39) . t28th (2) . Warhurst 1924 . 2nd (19) . 3rd (31 .5) . + . Farrell 2003 . 6th (51 .5) . t13th (16) . 7th (56) . t52nd(4) . Warhurst 1925 . 1st (22.33) . 1st (45.5) . + . Farrell 2004 . 3rd (94 .5) .
    [Show full text]
  • Considering Quality in a Business Combination
    Maximizing Value in Healthcare Mergers and Acquisitions Considering Quality in a Business Combination by Alexandra Normington, Juniper Advisory Of the umpteen elements hospital leaders evaluate when considering the viability of a potential partner, quality is generally at the top of the list. A larger partner can bring the scale, resources and expertise many smaller hospitals and systems seek to improve care quality for their community. This can include enhanced clinical protocols and standards, facility and equipment investments, deployment or recruitment of highly-skilled medical staff, patient support programs and more. Integrated delivery systems are also better positioned to address population health and health inequities, offering new approaches to keeping communities well and synergies with readmissions reduction strategies. A partnership can provide a host of opportunities to improve care quality and patient outcomes, but in the early stages of exploration there is limited ability to dive deep into tactics. Instead, hospital leaders look for succinct ways to ascertain a potential partner’s quality of care. Countless measures can be equated to quality, from objective metrics like infection and readmission rates, to the more subjective, like noise levels at night. And there is no shortage of options for comparison: CMS Hospital Compare, Leapfrog, Consumer Reports, US News & World Report, the Commonwealth Fund. Many states also have their own scorecards. These comparison tools attempt to distill complex hospital data into a single, consumer-friendly quality rating or grade. While these efforts are admirable in theory, health care organizations and trade groups regularly question rating systems’ methodologies, weighting and the impact of incomplete or statistically insignificant data.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Consolidation Trends in Today's Healthcare Environment
    HOSPITAL CONSOLIDATION TRENDS IN TODAY'S HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT ---------------------- ~---------------------- A GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE WH I TE PAPER • SUMMER 20 I 0 The Governance Institute"' The essential resource for governance knowledge and solutions' 9685 Via Excelencia • Suite 100 • San Diego, CA 92126 Toll Free (877) 712-8778 • Fax (858) 909-0813 Governancelnstltute.com About the Authors uring his 30-year investment banking career, James previously a consultant at the Blue Cross BlueShield Association. Ms. Burgdorfer, principal and founder ofJuniper Advisory, Borislava holds an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. LLC, has concentrated on domestic and international Rex Burgdorfer joined Juniper Advisory in 2009 and focuses on D merger and acquisition assignments, and has further executing mergers and acquisitions transactions for the firm's clients. specialized in merger work for the hospital industry since 1990. Prior Rex was previously with Morgan Stanley and holds an M.B.A. from the to forming Juniper, he co-led the mergers and acquisitions groups Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. of Ponder & Co. and John Nuveen & Co. Jamie was a member of Kathleen Maloney is responsible fo r administration at Juniper. Prior Citigroup's mergers and acquisitions department for eight yearsi to joining the firm, she was a member of the mergers and acquisitions before that, he was a vice president in the corporate finance group at group at Ponder & Co., and before that she worked at Northwestern A.G. Becker. He holds an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. University Medical School. Ms. Maloney holds a B.S. from Northern David Gordon's 27 years of advisory experience has been concen­ lllinois University.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Appropriations for 2010 Hearings Committee on Appropriations
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR 2010 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE JOHN P. MURTHA, Pennsylvania, Chairman NORMAN D. DICKS, Washington C. W. BILL YOUNG, Florida PETER J. VISCLOSKY, Indiana RODNEY P. FRELINGHUYSEN, New Jersey JAMES P. MORAN, Virginia TODD TIAHRT, Kansas MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio JACK KINGSTON, Georgia ALLEN BOYD, Florida KAY GRANGER, Texas STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey HAROLD ROGERS, Kentucky SANFORD D. BISHOP, JR., Georgia MAURICE D. HINCHEY, New York CAROLYN C. KILPATRICK, Michigan NOTE: Under Committee Rules, Mr. Obey, as Chairman of the Full Committee, and Mr. Lewis, as Ranking Minority Member of the Full Committee, are authorized to sit as Members of all Subcommittees. PAUL JUOLA, GREG LANKLER, SARAH YOUNG, LINDA PAGELSEN, PAUL TERRY, KRIS MALLARD, ADAM HARRIS, ANN REESE, BROOKE BOYER, TIM PRINCE, MATT WASHINGTON, B G WRIGHT, CHRIS WHITE, CELES HUGHES, and ADRIENNE RAMSAY, Staff Assistants SHERRY L. YOUNG, Administrative Aide PART 1 Page Air Force Nuclear Enterprise ............................................... 1 Contract Services and Acquisition Management ............ 55 Army Contracting .................................................................... 283 Outsourcing ............................................................................... 353 Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury Problems ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2015 Annual Report
    2015 ANNUAL REPORT L i vi n g W e l l with an Unbreakable Spirit ® BOARD OF A Message From DIRECTORS PRESIDENT the President Mark D. Birdwhistell, Richmond, KY University of Kentucky Healthcare Dear Members: FIRST VICE PRESIDENT As you all know, the mission of the Osteogenesis Robin Wright, G.G., New York, NY Imperfecta Foundation is to improve lives of people living with OI. I am proud to report that Sotheby’s the work we have accomplished during the last SECOND VICE PRESIDENT fiscal year reflects the progress we have made in Alcides Ortiz, Esq., Potomac, MD fulfilling our commitment the OI community. Department of Defense It’s hard to believe that in June of 2016 I will end my tenure as President of the OIF Board of TREASURER Directors. It has been a pleasure and honor to Kenneth W. Gudek, Sr., Salem, NH serve as your volunteer leader these past three Technical Needs years. And, I’m delighted to share with you, SECRETARY through this report, some of the important milestones reached in the areas Michelle M. Duprey, Esq., of research, mutual support and education. New Haven, CT In 2014 the OI Foundation hosted the biennial conference in Indianapolis, Department of Services for Persons IN. The conference brought together more than 700 people from the with Disabilities OI community. Conference attendees attended workshops from OI specialists and had the opportunity to connect with old friends and make MEDICAL ADISORY new ones as well. At the meeting’s opening session Dr. Brendan Lee from COUNCIL CHAIR Baylor College of Medicine and a member of the OIF’s Medical Advisory Francis Glorieux, O.C., M.D., Council, announced that OI would be represented in the National Institute Ph.D., Montreal, Quebec of Health’s Rare Disease Clinical Research Network as the Brittle Bone Shriners Hospital-Montreal Disorders Consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking It to the Next Level
    INDUSTRIAL PLAN 2020-2022 Taking it to the next level Investors Presentation Piazza Affari, Milan October 2019 0 0 DISCLAIMER This presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding the timing and financial impact of Be SpA's ability to implement its business plan, expected revenues and future success. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties and are based on assumptions involving judgments with respect to future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond BE SpA's control. Some of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements are general economic conditions, failure to achieve expected revenue growth, changes in our operating expenses, or legal developments, competitive pressures, changes in customer and market requirements and standards, and risk factors detailed from time to time in BE SpA’s statutory filings, including without limitation, BE SpA's Annual Reports. The forward-looking statements in this press release are based upon management's reasonable belief as of the date hereof. BE SpA undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. 1 1 1 AGENDA Where We Stand: 10 years of Growth Be Faster and Smarter on our Core Business A Brave New World: Getting Inside the Digital Eco-System Industrial Plan 2020-2022 Targets 2 2 "BE” AT A GLANCE: OUR KEY STATEMENTS New areas of investment: experiences and passions Leading «Business Consulting & Advanced IT are increasingly driving the propensity for digital Service Platform» for Financial Institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Reporting Requirements December 2019
    TEMPLE UNIVERSITY COMMONWEALTH REPORTING REQUIREMENTS DECEMBER 2019 VOLUME 2 Temple University Financial Disclosure Report Purchase of Goods and Services Contracts Notes and Definitions The following report provides the required disclosures for reporting the purchase of goods and services contracts. The University’s Banner Finance System does not include data enabling the distinction between the purchases of goods and services. Therefore, a single report is provided that includes both. Expenditures are categorized in the attached report using the following categories: General Supplies & Services: o General supplies, expendable equipment and software. Health Service Programs: o Animal lab, professional billing and other outside professional services. Insurance: o Malpractice, property, general liability, and employees insurances. Interest & Taxes: o Bond interest, real estate tax and debt service costs. Library: o Books, electronic periodicals, subscriptions and film. Professional Fees & Contracts: o Auditing, legal and collection fees and subcontracts. Property, Plant & Equipment: o Capital equipment, buildings and building improvements. Rent: o Equipment, building and office rentals. Repairs & Maintenance: o Equipment repair, maintenance of buildings and grounds. Telecommunications: o Telephone equipment, data communications and cellular services. Travel: o Travel agency fees, foreign and domestic travel expenses. Utilities: o Electric, gas, water, sewer, steam, chilled water and other miscellaneous utilities expenses. Each entry provides the category into which the purchase falls, the vendor name and address and the amount of the purchase. There is no more than one entry per vendor for a single category within a responsibility center. Purchases of goods and services in the Disclosure Report include those which equal or exceed $1,000 for each vendor from all Budgeted Operating Funds including Temple University Physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Annual Report
    A TMOS ENERGY CORPORATION 2004 SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT g Yet one thing remains thesame. thingremains one Yet 2004 r o wth inthe history of ourcompany. witnessed themostsignificant at the beginning of 2004 1,672,798 45,267 2,905 1,012 49Bcf 5 at the beginning of 2005 3 ,161,13 6 *Byany measure, it’s been a year of incredible growth. But we believe the most important number, by far, is the one that did not change—our five core values of customer focus, employee focus, enterprise thinking, value creation, and honesty and integrity. 80,209 In fact, we believe our values made such growth possible. And that’s why, in this year’s summary annual report, we illustrate how each of these values shines in our employees and in our way of doing business. Since these core values are a constant, they help us—even in times of incredible growth and 4,208 change—to maintain our focus and stability. After all, a company must fully understand where it comes from in order to know where it is going. The acquisition of TXU Gas was measured carefully against each of these 1,565 core values. That’s because, while growth is important, it’s counterproductive if it’s haphazard or unmanaged. In our case, TXU Gas was not only a good fit, but also an evolution—one that increases our resources and better prepares us for continued growth and strength. 84 Bcf Atmos Energy embraces growth, knowing that it helps us better serve our customers and our investors in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • M&A Advisor Names Toneykorf Partners Turnaround Consulting
    Name: Barbara Grant Bereskin Telephone: 312-296-7267 Email: [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ToneyKorf Partners named Turnaround Consulting Firm of the Year and recognized for the Out-of-Court Restructuring of the Year by The M&A Advisor New York, December 10, 2019 - The M&A Advisor announced the winners of the 14th Annual Turnaround Awards on December 10, 2019. ToneyKorf Partners, LLC was named the Turnaround Consulting Firm of the Year and also recognized with an award for the Out-of-Court Restructuring of the Year ($10MM to $100MM) for the acquisition of Milford Hospital by Yale New Haven Health. The awards will be presented at a Black Tie Gala on March 18, 2020, at The Colony Hotel in Palm Beach, FL. “Since 2002, we have been honoring the leading turnaround transactions, companies, and dealmakers. The nominations, representing over 240 participating companies, were judged by an independent panel of industry experts. ToneyKorf Partners was chosen to receive the awards. It gives us great pleasure to recognize ToneyKorf Partners and bestow upon them our highest honor for distressed investing and reorganization firms and professionals,” said Roger Aguinaldo, Founder, The M&A Advisor. “ToneyKorf Partners is a representative of those that reached the pinnacle of the distressed investing, bankruptcy and reorganization industry for 2019 and earned these honors by standing out in a group of very impressive candidates.” “On our Seventh Anniversary, we are extremely honored to be selected as the Turnaround Firm of the Year. This recognition reinforces our commitment to our clients, and that ToneyKorf is Different,” said Steven R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2230 Filed 12/31/20 Entered 12/31/20 16:49:41 Pg 1 of 205
    1 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 3 IN RE: Lead Case No. 19-01189-11 4 Jointly Administered ASTRIA HEALTH, et al. 5 Debtors and Debtors in CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 Possession.1 7 8 I, Heather Montgomery, depose and say that I am employed by Kurtzman Carson 9 Consultants LLC (KCC), the claims and noticing agent for the Debtors in the above-captioned 10 case. 11 12 On December 28, 2020, at my direction and under my supervision, employees of KCC caused to be served the following document via Electronic Mail upon the service list attached 13 hereto as Exhibit B; and via First Class Mail upon the service lists attached hereto as Exhibit C 14 and Exhibit D: 15 Notice of Confirmation of Modified Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of 16 Reorganization of Astria Health and Its Debtor Affiliates [attached hereto as Exhibit 17 A]. 18 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 19 Dated: December 31, 2020 20 /s/ Heather Montgomery 21 Heather Montgomery KCC 22 222 N. Pacific Coast 23 Highway, 2nd Floor El Segundo, CA 90245 24 Tel 310.823.9000 25 1 The Debtors, along with their case numbers, are as follows: Astria Health (19-01189-11), Glacier 26 Canyon, LLC (19-01193-11), Kitchen and Bath Furnishings, LLC (19-01194-11), Oxbow Summit, LLC (19-01195-11), SHC Holdco, LLC (19-01196-11), SHC Medical Center-Toppenish (19-01190-11), SHC 27 Medical Center-Yakima (19-01192-11), Sunnyside Community Hospital Association (19-01191-11), Sunnyside Community Hospital Home Medical Supply, LLC (19-01197-11), Sunnyside Home Health (19- 28 01198-11), Sunnyside Professional Services, LLC (19-01199-11), Yakima Home Care Holdings, LLC (19- 01201-11), and Yakima HMA Home Health, LLC (19-01200-11).
    [Show full text]