• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Engineering the quantum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two-photon driving Shruti Puri and Samuel Boutin Institut quantique and D´epartment de Physique, Universit´ede Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qu´ebec, Canada J1K 2R1 Alexandre Blais Institut quantique and D´epartment de Physique, Universit´ede Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Qu´ebec, Canada J1K 2R1 and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Canada Photonic cat states stored in high-Q resonators show great promise for hardware efficient universal quantum computing. We propose an approach to efficiently prepare such cat states in a Kerr- nonlinear resonator by the use of a two-photon drive. Significantly, we show that this preparation is robust against single-photon loss. An outcome of this observation is that a two-photon drive can eliminate undesirable phase evolution induced by a Kerr nonlinearity. By exploiting the concept of transitionless quantum driving, we moreover demonstrate how non-adiabatic initialization of cat states is possible. Finally, we present a universal set of quantum logical gates that can be performed on the engineered eigenspace of such a two-photon driven resonator and discuss a possible realization using superconducting circuits. The robustness of the engineered subspace to higher-order circuit nonlinearities makes this implementation favourable for scalable quantum computation. Keywords: Cat-states, parametric amplifiers, cat-codes, quantum computing INTRODUCTION fer an arbitrary state of a superconducting qubit into a multi-legged cat state [13, 15, 17]. This method is, Characterized by photon-photon interaction, Kerr- however, susceptible to single-photon loss that decoheres nonlinear resonators (KNR) display very rich physics and the cat. This loss also reduces the amplitude of the cat, are consequently the focus of much theoretical and exper- something that must be compensated for by re-pumping imental work [1]. These nonlinear oscillators exhibit bi- in order to avoid significant overlap between the coher- furcation [2], can be used to generate squeezed radiation ent states [13, 15]. A second approach exploits engineered and for quantum limited amplification [3, 4], and have two-photon dissipation realized by coupling a supercon- been proposed as a resource for quantum logic [5]. More- ducting qubit to two microwave cavities [14, 20]. In the over, a KNR initialized in a coherent state evolves to a absence of single-photon loss, the steady-state of the field quantum superposition of out-of-phase coherent states, is a cat state whose parity depends on the initial num- also known as a cat state [6]. In practice, Kerr nonlin- ber state of the field. To preserve coherence of the cat, earities K in atomic systems are, however, often small an important experimental challenge is that the rate of in comparison to photon loss rate κ [7], making the ob- single-photon loss must be much smaller than the rate of servation of these non-classical states of light difficult. two-photon loss. As an alternative approach, strong photon-photon inter- In this paper we propose an experimentally simple action can readily be realized in superconducting quan- alternative approach to encode and stabilize cat states tum circuits, with K/κ 30 demonstrated experimen- based on two-photon driving of a KNR. This method ∼ takes advantage of the fact that the coherent states α tally [8]. This has led to the observation of cat states |± i in the transient dynamics of a KNR realized by coupling and, consequently the cat states α± = α±( α α ) 2 α 2 jC i N j i ± |− i a superconducting qubit to a microwave resonator [8]. with α± = 1= 2(1 e− j j ), are degenerate eigen- statesN of the KNR under± two-photon driving. Remark- These photonic cat states play an important role in un- p arXiv:1605.09408v3 [quant-ph] 21 Apr 2017 derstanding the role of decoherence in macroscopic sys- ably, this property holds true even in the presence of tems [9], in precision measurements [10] and are useful single-photon loss making this protocol particularly ro- for quantum computation [11, 12]. However, because of bust and obviating the need for energy re-pumping. their sensitivity to undesirable interactions and photon Moreover, in contrast to the above-mentioned scheme, loss, high-fidelity preparation and manipulation of these cat state preparation with this approach does not require states is challenging. dissipation but rather relies on adiabatically turning on To address this problem, new ideas building on en- the two-photon drive, the number state 0=1 evolving += j i gineered dissipation and taking advantage of the strong into − . We find that the fidelity of this preparation jCα(t) i nonlinearities that are possible with superconducting cir- approaches unity when the Kerr nonlinearity K is large cuits have recently been explored theoretically and ex- with respect to the photon loss rate κ, something that is perimentally [13{18]. One such approach, known as the easily realized in current circuit QED experiments. By qcMAP gate, relies on the strong dispersive qubit-field exploiting the concept of transitionless quantum driving, interaction that is possible in circuit QED [19] to trans- we show that rapid, non-adiabatic cat state preparation 2 is possible by controlling the amplitude and phase of the 0.0 0.3 two-photon drive [21]. 2 (a)(a) While large Kerr nonlinearities can be used to pro- duce cat states, it also leads to undesired deformations 0 of these states [6, 8]. This deformation is problematic for qubit-based schemes because of the spurious Kerr non- -2 2 (b) linearity inherited by the field from the qubit [22, 23]. (b) This affects, for example, the qcMAP protocol where 0 the qubit-induced Kerr nonlinearity leads to undesirable phase evolution and distortion of the cat state. Although -2 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 this deterministic phase evolution can be corrected with qubit-induced-gates, this exposes the field to the deco- herence channel of the qubit [24]. Moreover, in the pres- FIG. 1. Steady-state Wigner function of a two-photon driven ence of photons loss, this phase evolution leads to non- KNR with K /κ = 1=8 and (a) p = 16K, K > 0 and (b) j j E 2 deterministic phase errors [18]. We show how the addi- p = 4K, K < 0, corresponding to κ/8 Kα0 1=16 and tion of a two-photon drive of appropriate amplitude and E 1=4 respectively. The white circles indicatej j the ∼ expected ∼ phase during the qcMAP cancels this distortion and the position of the coherent states following Eq. (3). corresponding dephasing. Taking advantage of the engineered subspace of a two- photon driven KNR, we consider a universal set of gates In the presence of single-photon loss, the resonator _ for an encoding where the coherent states +α ; α state evolves according to the master equation ρ^ = ^ ^ ¯ ¯ fj i |− ig i(Heff ρ^ ρ^Hy ) + κa^ρ^a^y, with the non-Hermitian ef- are mapped to the logical states 0 ; 1 . This mapping − − eff fj i j ig fective Hamiltonian H^ = H^ iκa^ya=^ 2 [26]. While the is possible because of the quasi-orthogonality of coher- eff 0 − ent states for large α [14]. We show that high-fidelity steady-state of this master equation can be obtained an- operations can be realized with realistic parameters. Fi- alytically [27, 28], it is simple to show (see Methods) that 2 iθ0 nally, we discuss realizations based on superconducting for κ/8 Kα0 1 the coherent states α0 = r0e j j ^ |± i |± i Josephson parametric amplifiers which allow the imple- are degenerate eigenstates of Heff with mentation of a two-photon drive along with a Kerr non- 2 2 1=4 linearity. This simple setup is attractive for building a 4 p κ =4 κ r0 = E − 2 ; tan 2θ0 = : (3) large scale quantum computing architecture. 4K 16 2 κ2 Ep − q This reduces to the eigenstates of H^0 in the absence of RESULTS photon loss. The angle θ0 is determined by p, with θ < 0 (θ > 0) for > 0 ( < 0). The lastE term 0 0 Ep Ep Our starting point is the two-photon driven KNR of the master equation, κaρa^ y, induces nondeterministic Hamiltonian in a frame rotating at the resonator fre- quantum jumps between the even and the odd parity cat + quency states, and − , leading to decoherence, but not jCα0 i jCα0 i to leakage out of the degenerate subspace ± . In 2 2 α0 H^ = Ka^ya^ya^a^ + ( a^y + ∗a^ ): (1) fjC ig 0 − Ep Ep steady-state, the density matrix therefore takes the form ρ^ = ( α α + α α )=2 [27, 28] (see Methods). In the above expression, K is the amplitude of the Kerr s 0 0 0 0 Figurej ih 1 showsj |− theih− steady-statej Wigner function for nonlinearity and the amplitude of the two-photon p κ/8 Kα2 1=4 and 1=16 obtained by numerical inte- drive. The aboveE Hamiltonian, known as the Cassinian 0 grationj ofj ∼ the master∼ equation [29, 30]. Even for the oscillator Hamiltonian [25], can be re-written as relatively large value of κ/8 Kα 2 1=16 shown in j 0j ∼ 2 panel a), the steady-state approaches the ideal caseρ ^s 2 p∗ 2 p p H^ = K ay E a E + jE j : (2) 0 − − K − K K with a fidelity of 99:91%. As expected and evident from Fig. 1(b), the coherent states are deformed at the larger 2 This form of the Hamiltonian illustrates that the two value of κ/8 Kα0 1=4 and the fidelity with respect 1=2 j j ∼ coherent states α with α = ( p=K) , which are to the ideal steady state is reduced to 96:55%.

Load more

  16

Copy Link