Status of Greenspotted Rockfish, Sebastes Chlorostictus, in U.S. Waters Off California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Status of Greenspotted Rockfish, Sebastes Chlorostictus, in U.S. Waters Off California Status of Greenspotted Rockfish, Sebastes chlorostictus, in U.S. waters off California Photo: Rick Starr E.J. Dick*, Don Pearson, and Steve Ralston Fisheries Ecology Division Southwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service *corresponding author; [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................. i Stock ........................................................................................................................................................................................... i Catches ...................................................................................................................................................................................... i Data and assessment ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Stock biomass ...................................................................................................................................................................... iii Recruitment ......................................................................................................................................................................... vi Exploitation status ........................................................................................................................................................... vii Reference points ................................................................................................................................................................ ix Management performance ............................................................................................................................................. xi Unresolved problems and major uncertainties .................................................................................................... xi Decision tables ................................................................................................................................................................... xii Research and data needs .............................................................................................................................................. xvi 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Distribution and Stock Structure .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Life History and Ecosystem Interactions ........................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Historical and Current Fisheries ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Management History and Performance ............................................................................................................. 4 1.5 Fisheries in Mexico ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Data ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Data from Commercial Fisheries .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Recent Commercial Landings (1969-2010) ............................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Historical Commercial Catch Reconstruction ......................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Discards in Commercial Fisheries ................................................................................................................ 7 2.1.4 Foreign Catch ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1.5 Biological Sampling of Commercial Fisheries ......................................................................................... 8 2.2 Data from Recreational Fisheries ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2.1 Recent Recreational Landings (1980 to present) ................................................................................ 10 2.2.2 Historical Recreational Catch Reconstruction ...................................................................................... 10 2.2.3 Discards in Recreational Fisheries ............................................................................................................ 11 2.2.4 Biological Sampling of Recreational Fisheries ...................................................................................... 11 2.2.5 CDFG Onboard Observer Index for Northern California, 1987-1998 ......................................... 13 2.2.6 RecFIN CPUE Indices for Northern and Southern California .......................................................... 13 2.3 Fishery Independent Data ..................................................................................................................................... 14 2.3.1 Northwest Fisheries Science Center (NWFSC) combined trawl survey .................................... 14 2.3.2 Southern California Hook-and-Line Survey ........................................................................................... 14 2.3.3 Fishery-independent data considered but not used .......................................................................... 15 2.4 Biological Data ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Length at Age ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4.2 Validation of Age Estimates .......................................................................................................................... 16 2.4.3 Ageing Precision and Bias ............................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.4 Weight-Length Relationship ........................................................................................................................ 17 2.4.5 Natural Mortality .............................................................................................................................................. 17 2.4.6 Maturity and Fecundity .................................................................................................................................. 18 2.4.7 Sex Ratios ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 3. Model Description ............................................................................................................................................................ 18 3.1 History of Modeling Approaches ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Assessment Program ............................................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 Areas and Fleets ......................................................................................................................................................... 19 3.4 Model specification and parameters ................................................................................................................. 20 3.5 Stock and recruitment ............................................................................................................................................. 21 4. Model selection and evaluation .................................................................................................................................. 21 4.1 Alternative models, structural choices, and key assumptions ............................................................... 21 4.1.1 Alternative hypotheses for changes in length frequency data ....................................................... 21 4.1.2 Requests by the STAR Panel and responses by the Stock Assessment Team (STAT) .......... 22 4.2 Base case model results .......................................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.1 Northern California base model ................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.2 Southern California base model .................................................................................................................. 29 4.3 Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses ................................................................................................................ 30
Recommended publications
  • CHECKLIST and BIOGEOGRAPHY of FISHES from GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, Arturo Ayala-Bocos, Luis E
    ReyeS-BONIllA eT Al: CheCklIST AND BIOgeOgRAphy Of fISheS fROm gUADAlUpe ISlAND CalCOfI Rep., Vol. 51, 2010 CHECKLIST AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF FISHES FROM GUADALUPE ISLAND, WESTERN MEXICO Héctor REyES-BONILLA, Arturo AyALA-BOCOS, LUIS E. Calderon-AGUILERA SAúL GONzáLEz-Romero, ISRAEL SáNCHEz-ALCántara Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada AND MARIANA Walther MENDOzA Carretera Tijuana - Ensenada # 3918, zona Playitas, C.P. 22860 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Ensenada, B.C., México Departamento de Biología Marina Tel: +52 646 1750500, ext. 25257; Fax: +52 646 Apartado postal 19-B, CP 23080 [email protected] La Paz, B.C.S., México. Tel: (612) 123-8800, ext. 4160; Fax: (612) 123-8819 NADIA C. Olivares-BAñUELOS [email protected] Reserva de la Biosfera Isla Guadalupe Comisión Nacional de áreas Naturales Protegidas yULIANA R. BEDOLLA-GUzMáN AND Avenida del Puerto 375, local 30 Arturo RAMíREz-VALDEz Fraccionamiento Playas de Ensenada, C.P. 22880 Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Ensenada, B.C., México Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Carr. Tijuana-Ensenada km. 107, Apartado postal 453, C.P. 22890 Ensenada, B.C., México ABSTRACT recognized the biological and ecological significance of Guadalupe Island, off Baja California, México, is Guadalupe Island, and declared it a Biosphere Reserve an important fishing area which also harbors high (SEMARNAT 2005). marine biodiversity. Based on field data, literature Guadalupe Island is isolated, far away from the main- reviews, and scientific collection records, we pres- land and has limited logistic facilities to conduct scien- ent a comprehensive checklist of the local fish fauna, tific studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rockfish (Sebastes) That Are Evolutionarily Isolated Are Also
    Biological Conservation 142 (2009) 1787–1796 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Rockfish (Sebastes) that are evolutionarily isolated are also large, morphologically distinctive and vulnerable to overfishing Karen Magnuson-Ford a,b, Travis Ingram c, David W. Redding a,b, Arne Ø. Mooers a,b,* a Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 b IRMACS, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby BC, Canada V5A 1S6 c Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, #2370-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: In an age of triage, we must prioritize species for conservation effort. Species more isolated on the tree of Received 23 September 2008 life are candidates for increased attention. The rockfish genus Sebastes is speciose (>100 spp.), morpho- Received in revised form 10 March 2009 logically and ecologically diverse and many species are heavily fished. We used a complete Sebastes phy- Accepted 18 March 2009 logeny to calculate a measure of evolutionary isolation for each species and compared this to their Available online 22 April 2009 morphology and imperilment. We found that evolutionarily isolated species in the northeast Pacific are both larger-bodied and, independent of body size, morphologically more distinctive. We examined Keywords: extinction risk within rockfish using a compound measure of each species’ intrinsic vulnerability to Phylogenetic diversity overfishing and categorizing species as commercially fished or not. Evolutionarily isolated species in Extinction risk Conservation priorities the northeast Pacific are more likely to be fished, and, due to their larger sizes and to life history traits Body size such as long lifespan and slow maturation rate, they are also intrinsically more vulnerable to overfishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Localized Depletion of Three Alaska Rockfish Species Dana Hanselman NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auke Bay Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska
    Biology, Assessment, and Management of North Pacific Rockfishes 493 Alaska Sea Grant College Program • AK-SG-07-01, 2007 Localized Depletion of Three Alaska Rockfish Species Dana Hanselman NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auke Bay Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska Paul Spencer NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Resource Ecology and Fisheries Management (REFM) Division, Seattle, Washington Kalei Shotwell NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Auke Bay Laboratory, Juneau, Alaska Rebecca Reuter NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, REFM Division, Seattle, Washington Abstract The distributions of some rockfish species in Alaska are clustered. Their distribution and relatively sedentary movement patterns could make localized depletion of rockfish an ecological or conservation concern. Alaska rockfish have varying and little-known genetic stock structures. Rockfish fishing seasons are short and intense and usually confined to small areas. If allowable catches are set for large management areas, the genetic, age, and size structures of the population could change if the majority of catch is harvested from small concentrated areas. In this study, we analyzed data collected by the North Pacific Observer Program from 1991 to 2004 to assess localized depletion of Pacific ocean perch (Sebastes alutus), northern rockfish S.( polyspinis), and dusky rockfish (S. variabilis). The data were divided into blocks with areas of approxi- mately 10,000 km2 and 5,000 km2 of consistent, intense fishing. We used two different block sizes to consider the size for which localized deple- tion could be detected. For each year, the Leslie depletion estimator was used to determine whether catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) values in each 494 Hanselman et al.—Three Alaska Rockfish Species block declined as a function of cumulative catch.
    [Show full text]
  • (Scorpaeniformes, Scorpaenidae): GENOME CHARACT
    МОЛЕКУЛЯРНАЯ БИОЛОГИЯ, 2011, том 45, № 3, с. 434–445 ГЕНОМИКА. ТРАНСКРИПТОМИКА УДК 577.21 THE COMPLETE MITOCHONDRIAL GENOME OF THE MARBLED ROCKFISH Sebastiscus marmoratus (Scorpaeniformes, Scorpaenidae): GENOME CHARACTERIZATION AND PHYLOGENETIC CONSIDERATIONS © 2011 TianJun Xu, YuanZhi Cheng, XueZhu Liu, Ge Shi, RiXin Wang* Key Laboratory for Marine Living Resources and Molecular Engineering, College of Marine Science, Zhejiang Ocean University, China Received April 02, 2010 Accepted for publication May 12, 2010 The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the marbled rockfish Sebastiscus marmoratus (Scorpaeni formes, Scorpaenidae) was determined and phylogenetic analysis was conducted to elucidate the evolutionary relationship of the marbled rockfish with other Sebastinae species. This mitochondrial genome, consisting of 17301 bp, is highly similar to that of most other vertebrates, containing the same gene order and an identical number of genes or regions, including 13 proteincoding genes, two ribosomal RNAs, 22 transfer RNAs, and one putative control region. Most of the genes are encoded on the Hstrand, while the ND6 and seven tRNA genes (for Gln, Ala, Asn, Tyr, Ser (UCA), Glu, and Pro) are encoded on the Lstrand. The reading frame of two pairs of genes overlapped on the same strand (the ATPase 8 and 6 genes overlapped by ten nucleotides; ND4L and ND4 genes overlapped by seven nucleotides). The possibly nonfunctional lightstrand replication origin folded into a typical stemloop secondary structure and a conserved motif (5'GCCGG3') was found at the base of the stem within the tRNACys gene. An extent terminationassociated sequence (ETAS) and conserved sequence blocks (CSB) were identified in the control region, except for CSB1; unusual long tandem repeats were found at the 3' end of the control region.
    [Show full text]
  • Miscellaneous Demersal Fishes
    203 Miscellaneous demersal fishes Capture production by species, fishing areas and countries or areas B-34 Poissons démersaux divers Captures par espèces, zones de pêche et pays ou zones Peces demersales diversos Capturas por especies, áreas de pesca y países o áreas Species, Fishing area Espèce, Zone de pêche 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Especie, Área de pesca t t t t t t t t t t Greater argentine Grande argentine ...C Argentina silus 1,23(05)015,03 ARU 27 Germany 30 - - 538 417 1 223 1 066 306 584 1 068 Netherlands ... 2 903 1 562 1 785 1 430 4 267 2 119 2 501 3 438 2 913 Norway 864 664 217 32 258 190 60 146 10 1 27 Fishing area total 894 3 567 1 779 2 355 2 105 5 680 3 245 2 953 4 032 3 982 Species total 894 3 567 1 779 2 355 2 105 5 680 3 245 2 953 4 032 3 982 Argentine Petite argentine Pez plata Argentina sphyraena 1,23(05)015,04 ARY 27 Germany 85 - - 1 143 309 172 1 035 763 790 243 Netherlands 698 248 787 1 662 ... 2 - 1 872 0 Norway 784 671 361 327 996 2 520 3 180 5 830 5 370 7 787 27 Fishing area total 1 567 919 1 148 3 132 1 305 2 694 4 215 6 594 7 032 8 030 Species total 1 567 919 1 148 3 132 1 305 2 694 4 215 6 594 7 032 8 030 Argentines Argentines Argentinas Argentina spp 1,23(05)015,XX ARG 21 Canada 0 2 - - - - - - 2 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Co-Occurrence of Rockfishes (Family: Sebastidae) Over Trawlable Shelf and Slope Habitats of California and Southern Oregon
    Distribution and co-occurrence of rockfishes (family: Sebastidae) over trawlable shelf and slope habitats of California and southern Oregon Item Type article Authors Williams, Erik H.; Ralston, Stephen Download date 23/09/2021 19:56:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/31105 836 Abstract–The rockfishes of the se­ Distribution and co-occurrence of rockfishes bastid genus Sebastes are a very impor­ tant fishery resource off the coasts of (family: Sebastidae) over trawlable shelf and California and southern Oregon. How- ever, many of the 54 managed stocks slope habitats of California and southern Oregon of west coast rockfish have recently reached historically low population Erik H. Williams levels, leading fishery managers to re- examine current management prac­ Stephen Ralston tices. Management of rockfish stocks as Southwest Fisheries Science Center multispecies aggregates, as opposed to National Marine Fisheries Service independent stocks within the ground- 110 Shaffer Road fish fishery, can be more desirable when Santa Cruz, California 95060 nontargeted bycatch, discard, and man­ Present address (for E H. Williams): Southeast Fisheries Science Center agement complexity are considered. National Marine Fisheries Service Rockfish assemblage structure and 101 Pivers Island Road species co-occurrences were determined Beaufort, North Carolina 28516-9722 by using data from the Alaska Fisher­ E-mail address (for E. H. Williams): [email protected] ies Science Center triennial continental shelf bottom trawl survey. The weight of rockfish species in trawl catches was expressed as a catch-per-unit-of-effort (CPUE) statistic, from which species spatial distributions, overlaps, diver­ Rockfishes (family Sebastidae accord- tional Marine Fisheries Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Technical Subcommittee of the Canada-United States Groundfish Committee Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the TSC May 6-7, 2008 Seattle, Washington
    Report of the Technical Subcommittee of the Canada-United States Groundfish Committee Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the TSC May 6-7, 2008 Seattle, Washington Appointed by the Second Conference on Coordination of Fisheries Regulations between Canada and the United States Compiled by the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission History of TSC Meeting Locations, Hosts and Chairpersons YEAR DATES LOCATION HOST CHAIR 1984 June 20-22 British Columbia Westrheim Rigby 1985 June 25-27 Juneau, AK Morrison Westrheim 1986 June 19-19 Ashland, OR Demory Westrheim 1987 June 9-11 Seattle, WA Jagielo Demory 1988 June 7-9 Carmel, CA Henry Demory 1989 June 6-9 Ladysmith, BC Saunders Jagielo 1990 June 5-7 Sitka, AK Bracken Jagielo 1991 June 4-6 Newport, OR Barss Wilkins 1992 May 5-7 Seattle, WA Jagielo Wilkins 1993 May 5-7 Point Lobos, CA Thomas Saunders 1994 May 3-5 Nanaimo, BC Saunders Saunders 1995 May 2-3 Seattle, WA O’Connell Bracken 1996 May 7-9 Newport, OR Barss O’Connell 1997 May 6-8 Tiburon, CA Thomas Barss 1998 May 5-7 Olympia, WA Jagielo Barss 1999 May 4-6 Seattle, WA Methot Barnes 2000 May 9-10 Nanaimo, BC Saunders Barnes 2001 May 8-10 Newport, OR Schmitt Schmitt 2002 May 7-8 Point Lobos, CA Barnes Methot 2003 May 6-7 Sitka, AK O’Connell Jagielo 2004 May 4-5 Coupeville, WA Wilkins Jagielo 2005 May 3-4 Parksville, BC Stanley Stanley 2006 May 2-3 Otter Rock, OR Parker Stanley 2007 April 24-25 Santa Cruz, CA Field Brylinsky 2008 May 6-7 Seattle, WA Wilkins Brylinsky Table of Contents HISTORY OF TSC MEETING LOCATIONS……………………Inside Cover A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Productivity of Fish Associated with Offshore Oil and Gas Structures on the Pacific Ocs
    Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Region OCS Study BOEM 2014-030 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY OF FISH ASSOCIATED WITH OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS STRUCTURES ON THE PACIFIC OCS OCS Study BOEM 2014-030 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY OF FISH ASSOCIATED WITH OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS STRUCTURES ON THE PACIFIC OCS Authored by: Jeremy T. Claisse Daniel J. Pondella, II Milton Love Ann S. Bull Submitted by: Vantuna Research Group Occidental College Los Angeles, CA 90041 Prepared under: BOEM Cooperative Agreement M12AC00003 U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Camarillo Pacific OCS Region April 2014 Disclaimer This report had been reviewed by the Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Region, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, U.S. Department of the Interior and approved for publication. The opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. This report has not been edited for conformity with Bureau of Ocean Energy Management editorial standards. Availability Available for viewing and in PDF at: www.oxy.edu/vantuna-research-group Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Pacific OCS Region 770 Paseo Camarillo Camarillo, CA 93010 805-389-7621 Daniel J. Pondella, II Vantuna Research Group Occidental College Los Angeles, CA 9004 323-259-2955 Suggested citation Claisse J.T., Pondella D.J., Love M., Bull A.S. (2014) Biological productivity of fish associated with offshore oil and gas structures on the Pacific OCS. Vantuna Research Group, Occidental College, Los Angeles, California.
    [Show full text]
  • Composición Taxonómica Y Relaciones Zoogeográficas De Los Peces Demersales De La Costa Occidental De Baja California Sur, México
    Composición taxonómica y relaciones zoogeográficas de los peces demersales de la costa occidental de Baja California Sur, México Jesús Rodríguez-Romero1, Deivis S. Palacios-Salgado1, Juana López-Martínez1, Sergio Hernández-Vázquez1 & Germán Ponce-Díaz2 1. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR), Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, B.C.S., C.P. 23000, México. 2. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR- IPN). Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional S/N Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz, B.C.S., C.P. 23096, México; [email protected] Recibido 22-XI-2007. Corregido 30-VI-2008. Aceptado 31-VII-2008. Abstract: Taxonomic composition and zoogeographic relations of demersal in the western coast of Baja California Sur, Mexico. The composition of demersal fish along the western coast of the State of Baja California Sur, México, including the limit of the northern distribution of the ichthyofauna of the eastern tropi- cal Pacific, is presented. The survey was carried out on four oceanographic cruises between autumn 2004 and March 2006. Of 220 species in 132 genera and 73 families, 26.3% are species of wide distribution from San Diego County, USA to Panama and 21.7% are species restricted to the eastern tropical Pacific. Six species are new findings for the area or range expansions. The families with the most species are Paralichthyidae and Scorpaenidae, each with 16 species. The most frequent genus was Sebastes, with nine species. We present a table with common Spanish names, size range and status of each species inside the community. Rev. Biol. Trop. 56 (4): 1765-1783. Epub 2008 December 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcofi Report Vol 51, 2010
    VOLUME 51 DECEMBER 2010 California Cooperative oCeaniC fisheries investigations Reports VOLUME 51 JanUary 1 tO DEcEMbEr 31, 2010 Cooperating Agencies: California Department of fish anD game University of California, sCripps institUtion of oCeanography national oCeaniC anD atmospheriC aDministration, national marine fisheries serviCe CalCofi CoorDINATOR John n. heine eDitor John n. heine this report is not copyrighted, except where otherwise indicated, and may be reproduced in other publications provided credit is given to California Cooperative oceanic fisheries investigations and to the author(s). inquiries concerning this report should be addressed to CalCofi Coordinator, scripps institution of oceanography, la Jolla, Ca 92038-0218. eDitorial BoarD John n. heine laura rogers-Bennett Printed and distributed December 2010, La Jolla, California ISSN 0575-3317 calcOFI rep., Vol. 51, 2010 cOntEntS I. Reports, Reviews, and Publications Report of the CalCOFI Committee . 5 Review of Selected California Fisheries for 2009: Coastal Pelagic Finfish, Market Squid, Red Abalone, Dungeness Crab, Pacific Herring, Groundfish/Nearshore Live-Fish, Highly Migratory Species, Kelp, California Halibut, and Sandbasses. Dale Sweetnam, editor . 14 State of the California Current 2009–2010: Regional variation persists through transition from La Niña to El Niño (and back?). Eric Bjorkstedt, Ralf Goericke, Sam McClatchie, Ed Weber, William Watson, Nancy Lo, Bill Peterson, Bob Emmett, Jay Peterson, Reginaldo Durazo, Gilberto Gaxiola-Castro, Francisco Chavez, J.T. Pennington, C.A. Collins, John Field, Steve Ralston, Keith Sakuma, Steven Bograd, Franklin Schwing, Yan Xue, William Sydeman, Sarah Ann Thompson, Jarrod A. Santora, John Largier, Chris Halle, Steven Morgan, Sung Yong Kim, Karlina Merkens, John Hildebrand, Lisa Munger . 39 Publications . 71 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Fishes from Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary with Notes on Extralimital Species
    ISSN 1313-2970 (online) ISSN 1313-2989 (print) A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 887 2019 Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS), a federal marine protected area located off central California, is host to a diverse fish fauna occupying a variety of habitats. The rich history of ichthyological research and surveys off central California provide a wealth of information to ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF construct the first inventory of fishes occurring within MBNMS. FISHES FROM MONTEREY BAY Critical analyses of material from ichthyological collections at natural NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY history museums, the literature, and visual records were critical in creating WITH NOTES ON an annotated checklist of fishes occurring within MBNMS. The checklist EXTRALIMITAL SPECIES presented herein provides sources of basis, occurrence of fishes during cold- or warm-water events, records of historically occurring fishes, special BY places of occurrence (i.e., Davidson Seamount, Elkhorn Slough), introduced ERICA J. BURTON, RObeRT N. LEA species, and reference to original species descriptions from within MBNMS. Geographical errors in the literature based on misidentifications in the field are noted. This inventory provides evidence of occurrence for 507 fishes within MBNMS and an additional 18 species considered to be extralimital. This annotated checklist of fishes can be used by those interested in zoogeography, marine protected areas, ichthyology, regional natural history, and sanctuary management. ZooKeys 887 2019 http://zookeys.pensoft.net Special Issue ! http://zookeys.pensoft.net AUTHOR GUIDELINES Accepted Papers: Same as above, but are not limited to: Authors are kindly requested to sub- but ‘’In press’’ appears instead the • Zoobank (www.zoobank.org), mit their manuscript only through page numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • České Názvy Živočichů V. Ryby a Rybovití Obratlovci (Pisces)
    ČESKÉ NÁZVY ŽIVOČICHŮ V. RYBY A RYBOVITÍ OBRATLOVCI (PISCES) 7. PAPRSKOPLOUTVÍ (ACTINOPTERYGII) KOSTNATÍ (NEOPTERYGII) [ROPUšnicotvařÍ (ScorpaenifORmES) – OSTNOPLOUTVÍ (PERCIfORmES) – PERCOIdEI] LUBOmÍR HANEL, JIřÍ PLÍšTIL, JINdřICH NOVÁK Ryby_7.indd 1 9.11.2011 13:52:18 Studie byla vydána za finanční podpory ministerstva kultury ČR (výzkumný záměr mK ČR 00002327201) České názvy živočichů V. Ryby a rybovití obratlovci (Pisces). Paprskoploutví (Actinopterygii) Kostnatí (Neopterygii) [Ropušnicotvaří (Scorpaeniformes) – ostnoplout- ví (Perciformes) - Percoidei]. 7. Národní muzeum (zoologické oddělení), Praha. Autoři: Prof. RNdr. Lubomír Hanel, CSc. (fakulta životního prostředí, Katedra ekolo- gie, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6 – Suchdol, 165 21), Jiří Plíštil (Trávník 1236, Rychnov nad Kněžnou, 516 01), RNdr. Jindřich Novák, Ph.d. (Česká inspekce životního prostředí, Na Břehu 267, Praha 9, 190 00) Editor řady: RNdr. Miloš Anděra, CSc. Vědecký redaktor: RNdr. Miloš Anděra, CSc. Recenzenti: doc. Ing. Stanislav Lusk, CSc., RNdr. Jan Andreska, Ph.d. Počítačová úprava textu: Vladimír Vyskočil – KORšACH Tisk: PBtisk Příbram 1. vydání Náklad 350 výtisků © 2011 Národní muzeum ISBN 978-80-7036-317-1 Kresba na obálce: Jiří Plíštil (štítník z čeledi Triglidae) Ryby_7.indd 2 9.11.2011 13:52:18 OBSAH: ROPUŠNICOTVAŘÍ – SCORPAENIFORMES . 9 Letuchovití (DactylopteridAE) . 9 ROPUšnicovití (ScorpaenidAE) . 9 Oválkovití (CaracanthidAE) . 16 SAmetovcovití (AploactinidAE) . 17 Vlajkovkovití (PataecidAE) . 17 RUdíkovití (GnathanacanthidAE)
    [Show full text]